User Score
5.1

Mixed or average reviews- based on 2065 Ratings

User score distribution:
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
  1. Jul 29, 2020
    7
    Le he puesto un 7 porque la campaña me pareció espectacular, el nivel de gráficos está a nivel del the last of us 2 y las interpretaciones son muy buenas, la campaña te lleva a batallas muy importantes de la SGM como el desembarco de Normandía, la jugabilidad innova como curar mediante botiquines que te lo dan los compañeros o por el mapa, actos heroicos ya sean arrastrar a un soldadoLe he puesto un 7 porque la campaña me pareció espectacular, el nivel de gráficos está a nivel del the last of us 2 y las interpretaciones son muy buenas, la campaña te lleva a batallas muy importantes de la SGM como el desembarco de Normandía, la jugabilidad innova como curar mediante botiquines que te lo dan los compañeros o por el mapa, actos heroicos ya sean arrastrar a un soldado herido para llevarlo a cubierto o salvarlo de un aprieto. Los zombis no están nada mal y el multijugador está muy bien hecho con una lobby donde coger misiones, abrir paquetes de ayuda, duelos 1 vs 1...
    Conclusión, a mi me ha encantado y gracias a PSPlus que lo regalaron lo he podido jugar, el único defecto que tiene el juego es que en mi PS4 PRO los ventiladores se ponen al máximo que incluso a veces me salía el mensaje de sobrecalentamiento, por lo demás todo está muy bien.
    Expand
  2. Jul 28, 2020
    7
    Although it’s not a great game it’s still a solid if predictable tribute to all those who served.
  3. Jul 27, 2020
    7
    Call of Duty: WWII is exactly what you'd expect from a Call of Duty game. Big production values, bombastic set-pieces and all the shooty shooting you can stomach.

    The combat is as good as ever, the weapons feel meaty and satisfying and there is a decent amount of variety in weapons to keep things interesting. The graphics are good, as you'd expect from a CoD game. The story is decent
    Call of Duty: WWII is exactly what you'd expect from a Call of Duty game. Big production values, bombastic set-pieces and all the shooty shooting you can stomach.

    The combat is as good as ever, the weapons feel meaty and satisfying and there is a decent amount of variety in weapons to keep things interesting. The graphics are good, as you'd expect from a CoD game.

    The story is decent and brilliantly acted, if a little one dimensional and lacking in any really interesting twists and turns. So, yeah... it's a call of Duty game where you get to shoot Nazis. Nothing groundbreaking but a fun romp while it lasts.

    *I don't care about multiplayer so I can't tell you if that is any good or not.
    Expand
  4. Jul 26, 2020
    3
    Campain only:
    I've played it for about 1 hour. Turned it off and naver came back.
  5. Jul 22, 2020
    8
    This is only a review for the single player campaign, because that’s all I played. I thought it had a good story, one that you remember after it’s done, and the gameplay was satisfying. I enjoyed the feel of the rifles, and it felt like an accomplishment when each enemy fell because they don’t take many shots if you aim well, and that gives your shots weight. Although the story is short,This is only a review for the single player campaign, because that’s all I played. I thought it had a good story, one that you remember after it’s done, and the gameplay was satisfying. I enjoyed the feel of the rifles, and it felt like an accomplishment when each enemy fell because they don’t take many shots if you aim well, and that gives your shots weight. Although the story is short, it isn’t too short—I enjoyed it. Expand
  6. Jul 22, 2020
    9
    this game may not be perfect, and I will start with the flaws but by god it is enjoyable. first of all and the most prominent. the loot boxes. yes it is terrible and really showcases a pre-Starwars battlefront 2 era of games and they remain prominent in this game. my other issue has to be the map design, because it is just a bit boring, every map with only one exception being built on thethis game may not be perfect, and I will start with the flaws but by god it is enjoyable. first of all and the most prominent. the loot boxes. yes it is terrible and really showcases a pre-Starwars battlefront 2 era of games and they remain prominent in this game. my other issue has to be the map design, because it is just a bit boring, every map with only one exception being built on the three-lane design that is in next-to every cod game. however there are parts of this game that make up for it.

    The campaign.
    I was just expecting your average run-of-the-mill cod campaign when I decided to download this game when I saw it on PS+ earlier this year but my goodness, it was amazing. it starts off with a dark but beautiful recreation of the Omaha beach landings on D-Day, they spared no expense in showcasing a huge map filled with dug out trenches, broken barricades and thousands of soldiers along with it. just playing that first 45-minute long mission grabs you right into the experience. the game puts a large emphasis onto teamwork and tactics. you can call on the NPCs around you to give you callouts, extra ammunition and grenades or med packs, removing the standard automatic healing system that is commonplace in most games.

    The multiplayer

    now I don't usually play multiplayer but one of my favourite parts of this game is the war mode, it is a 18-18 game mode where one team has to complete objectives and another has to stop the other team from completing the objectives, these can be anything from securing intel and moving tanks across a snowy forest to a recreation of the D-Day landings and building a bridge, these are hectic, extreme and fun. I cannot tell you how many hours I have put into this game mode. it is truly amazing

    in the end, I don't think this is amazing and there are many downfalls but taking that away leaves a good and fun game.
    Expand
  7. Jul 20, 2020
    7
    The story is decent and the gameplay as well, but it's just more of the same old, same old.
  8. Jul 17, 2020
    8
    La storia è semplicemente fantastica, molto commovente e ti fa sentire dentro il gioco, unica pecca: i personaggi non vengono "focussati".
    Il multiplayer mi sembra abbastanza normale, nella media
  9. Jul 11, 2020
    2
    Stop listening to the corrupt, fake, paid-off reviews. This game is not worth buying. The story is boring and forgettable. The multiplayer is repetitive, boring and has some of the worst cut scene animations which look like they belong in a PS1 era game.
  10. Jul 11, 2020
    2
    What a terrible game. What a sad return to WW2. I actually enjoy the campaigns of COD games - this is the first that i just find totally unplayable. Bad characters, the worst quick-time-events i've ever seen, arcade-style shooting and the most boring story.
  11. Jul 10, 2020
    7
    O multiplayer tradicional deste COD é o mais fraco, entretanto, o Modo Zombies é excelente e a campanha não deixa a peteca cair. No frigir dos ovos é um bom game, e graficamente muito lindo. As mecanicas de solicitação de pacotes de vida, de munição, de bombas e sinalizadores é muito boa também. Por fim, é um game legal com um ou outro momento de destaque na campanha, não é um Call of DutyO multiplayer tradicional deste COD é o mais fraco, entretanto, o Modo Zombies é excelente e a campanha não deixa a peteca cair. No frigir dos ovos é um bom game, e graficamente muito lindo. As mecanicas de solicitação de pacotes de vida, de munição, de bombas e sinalizadores é muito boa também. Por fim, é um game legal com um ou outro momento de destaque na campanha, não é um Call of Duty no nível de Modern Warfare (o original de PS3) nem de um Black Ops, mas traz muita coisa interessante, e serve como um throwback aos CODs de PS2/XBOX/GC que eram ambientados na Segunda Guerra. Expand
  12. Jul 9, 2020
    9
    Call of Duty: WWII is peak Call of Duty to me (because I have not played the Modern Warfare reboot or CoD:BlOpsIIII). I think back to playing Call of Duty: Ghosts a few years into the current generation and thinking about how awful it looks next to PS4 exclusives like Uncharted 4. Now we have a Call of Duty that finally looks, feels, and sounds like a current gen game. Activision stoppedCall of Duty: WWII is peak Call of Duty to me (because I have not played the Modern Warfare reboot or CoD:BlOpsIIII). I think back to playing Call of Duty: Ghosts a few years into the current generation and thinking about how awful it looks next to PS4 exclusives like Uncharted 4. Now we have a Call of Duty that finally looks, feels, and sounds like a current gen game. Activision stopped counting money and finally made a great game.

    Let's gloss over the multiplayer. It is the classic boots on the ground game that fans have been supposedly clamoring for since Call of Duty added cyborgs and exoskeletons. As an old school gamer, I love it. Jumping into a match was as disorienting as ever for a new player yet I the shooting and killing is the same. I love that I can pick up great weapons off the corpses of higher level players. I think an equal start mode would be better, liked fixed classes in Team Fortress and Overnight. Overall, I love the old school World War 2 action and finding a match was incredibly easy. There is also a zombie mode for co-op lovers. No one says that Call of Duty is not the complete package, unless they are talking about CoD:BlOpsIIII because that game did not have a single player campaign.

    The single player campaign in in CoD:WWII is the best I've played in a Call of Duty game since CoD 4: Modern Warfare back in in the 00s. The campaign is so good, it rivals the campaigns in great single player only games. Although the game is focused on the grim reality of World War 2, the developers added a lot of fun elements like sniping levels, a little tank action, and some light air combat. The tank inspired level was all the more amazing with the destructible environment and the great audio. You can hear the crunch as you drive over piles of bricks. Why doesn't Activision make an entire game like this, and I don't mean the pay-to-win World of Tanks? The air combat section was a bit kindergarten (no pun intended) but still looked and sounded great. If the ACE Combat series looked this good, I would buy into it. The stealth missions will hold your hand, as usual, to a certain extent, and letting the game proceed after failing with stealth is new. In many ways, CoD:WWII felt like a mashup of World War 2 game classics minus Castle Wolfenstein. (Wouldn't a Call of Duty version of the Great Escape be bonkers? I suppose it was done in CoD:BlOps but then again, when has Activision every refrained from repeating itself?)

    The health system in WWII is a bit iffy. Rather than crouching under cover to regain health, the player character uses health packs. Sometimes a buddy will toss you a health pack and sometimes you find them laying around in the forest. I see this as a side-grade of the usual health system that Call of Duty borrowed from Halo: Combat Evolved. What the game really needs is a true a.i. system that does not have every gun trained with 100% accuracy on the player character.

    The NPCs will shout "Daniels" a few times a minute. If you are named Daniels, then you will love this game. Or you might hate it. The developers are pushing toward immersion and they succeed halfway because the barks from the NPCs are too constant and the game still has to throw up on-screen directions. The levels are also designed to be idiot proof. The player area is in most cases quite narrow and serve to funnel players back onto the set path. The game does not reward curiosity, even if there are 33 mementos to collect.

    The story is the real star of the campaign. The character detail and voice acting help to sell it. World War 2 aficionados will know the context of the battles, even if the details do not all seem authentic. The human story, however, is told well, and I do not envy the men who endured all those months of fighting from D-Day to crossing the Rhine.

    Full disclosure: I bought this game for $5 used from Gamestop. Then PlayStation released the game for free a month later. Activision did get some of my money out of this (and they deserve it), but I think Activision's ultimate goal was to have more players to buy additional content on-line This is silly in for any historical game as the appeal of the game is the historical accuracy. If Activision focuses on making good games, people will buy them.
    Expand
  13. Jul 9, 2020
    5
    Got it from PS Plus. Never ever finished it. Gameplay is boring as hell and feels like a remastered Call of Duty 2 from the early 2000. Which is not a bad thing, if the game was published at least 10 years ago. The stealth missions are a disgrace. Nothing like from CoD4. Plot is chaotic as well. And I am so tired that Americans won everything and not only in WW2. Pathetic.
  14. Jul 7, 2020
    10
    The most fun I've had with the franchise since Blacks Ops 2. Quit playing after Ghosts, got this free from PS Plus and was very pleasantly surprised with how fun it is. The graphics are clean, the gameplay is slick, the campaign is actually interesting and varied this time around. Plenty of stealth sections, that never feel out of place and actually feel organic. Great cut-scenes, with aThe most fun I've had with the franchise since Blacks Ops 2. Quit playing after Ghosts, got this free from PS Plus and was very pleasantly surprised with how fun it is. The graphics are clean, the gameplay is slick, the campaign is actually interesting and varied this time around. Plenty of stealth sections, that never feel out of place and actually feel organic. Great cut-scenes, with a decent story and great voice acting. The multiplayer is also pretty good, though it is lacking in game modes, and maps, but more than makes up for in customization. There are so many weapons in this game, it almost borders on absurd. Some of the guns are just worthless, and have no place, but with the huge selection too choose from you are left with countless possibilities for crafting your own play style. The only real let down on this game is the zombies. It feels slow, somewhat boring, the enemies present little too no challenge, and the only map you get too play, feels very convoluted and drawn out. It takes way too long to finish a match, and I've only found myself actually playing it a handful of times. If you like the older Call of Duty games, and have been pining for some kind of sequel too World at War, this is the closest you're gonna get. Don't let the outrage mob try too convince you this isn't a good game, it's just different from what most people are used too. Expand
  15. Jul 2, 2020
    10
    Muy infravalorado. Veeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeery undervalued
  16. Jul 1, 2020
    7
    Just finished this game after I got it through my PS+ subscription.
    I don`t know why COD WW2 took so much heat from the audience, but I had a great time while playing it.
    The graphics are decent, the plot is very simple yet manages to keep one entertained, the campaign length is enough for 5-6 eves of intensive gameplay. What else do ya`ll want from a shooter? You run and you shoot, as
    Just finished this game after I got it through my PS+ subscription.
    I don`t know why COD WW2 took so much heat from the audience, but I had a great time while playing it.
    The graphics are decent, the plot is very simple yet manages to keep one entertained, the campaign length is enough for 5-6 eves of intensive gameplay. What else do ya`ll want from a shooter? You run and you shoot, as simple as that. Yes, the dialogues in this game are dull and full of washed out cliches, but it`s not a first FPS to abuse that and definitely not the last. COD WW2 also has a number of gameplay shortcomings that get quite annoying after several hours of playing, like indistructible tables or other seemingly fragile objects that absorb RPG shots and leave enemies untouched, or crazy damage the nazis do on high level of difficulty resulting in frequent one-shots. Also, the friendly NPC`s are often annoying as they constantly run in front of you making it more difficult to aim at the enemies.
    But generally, I liked the dynamics of the game, I loved the missions where you operate a tank or a plane, the shooting itself feels pretty good, and the whole COD WW2 just feels like a solid game to spend a few eves with.
    Expand
  17. Jul 1, 2020
    4
    Mediocre game which is nothing like the old and good entries of the saga.

    - Campaign is short, cliched and disapointing, with few interesting missions. - Multiplayer is boring and destroyed by the good old microtransactions, loot boxes, and in game store. To make it all better, now you can open your lootbox at the Omaha beach, which is kinda depressing. - Zombies is the most decent
    Mediocre game which is nothing like the old and good entries of the saga.

    - Campaign is short, cliched and disapointing, with few interesting missions.
    - Multiplayer is boring and destroyed by the good old microtransactions, loot boxes, and in game store. To make it all better, now you can open your lootbox at the Omaha beach, which is kinda depressing.
    - Zombies is the most decent mode, but gets repetitive quickly, with new additions made via DLC.

    Overall, another disapointing entry in the saga that is not even worth half of its retail price.
    Expand
  18. Jul 1, 2020
    9
    The campaign:

    Wonderful storytelling and quality. The graphics are top of the line, the visuals in general are great, the sound is excellent, etc. The story is great action and hooks you at the end in a great way. In the final mission I genuinely got attached to the characters and even got a bit sentimental. (9/10) The multiplayer: I played it only a bit. Got to rank 10 and I can
    The campaign:

    Wonderful storytelling and quality. The graphics are top of the line, the visuals in general are great, the sound is excellent, etc. The story is great action and hooks you at the end in a great way. In the final mission I genuinely got attached to the characters and even got a bit sentimental. (9/10)

    The multiplayer:

    I played it only a bit. Got to rank 10 and I can say it's good but not much more. I prefer other COD's for the multiplayer. But for a WW2 shooter it does a great job. (7/10 but keep in mind I didn't play it a lot)

    The Zombies:

    I am gonna get some hate for saying this, but... I actually really liked the zombies. I prefer BO3 over this but still they're pretty competent. I had a great time trying to beat The Third Reich's storyline with some friends. It surely provided me with some great time during the 2 or 3 weeks it took. I would recommend trying to solve its story without looking up a guide, makes it more fun. (9/10)
    Expand
  19. Jun 30, 2020
    9
    De todos los COD que he probado este tiene la mejor campaña, todos sus personajes son carismáticos y están bien desarrollados.
  20. Jun 29, 2020
    4
    By the americans, for the americans. If I had to describe the game in one word, I would say "America". America lost around 350k soldiers during this war, but it's strange and I wonder why this game didn't tell me a single word about the URSS army that won this war, entered Berlin firstly and lost about 23.5 millions of people...
  21. Jun 27, 2020
    6
    Plutôt un bon jeu , il manque un peu de contenu , mais il fait très bien l'affaire pour une partie entre amis ,les loot box pour débloquer certaines armes sont un peu abusé il faut bien l'admettre ( déjà que le nombres d'armes n'est pas conséquent) donc je peut tout a fait comprendre la note final, bien que je soit satisfait du jeu
  22. Jun 26, 2020
    8
    Campaign only review:
    This is my first COD game and I loved it. The campaign is short and not too long. Making it perfect to end the game before it started becoming repetitive and boring. The graphics are amazing and the sound is great too. I honestly haven't played other COD games and I also see a lot negative reviews here.I cannot compare with other COD games but this one had pretty
    Campaign only review:
    This is my first COD game and I loved it. The campaign is short and not too long. Making it perfect to end the game before it started becoming repetitive and boring. The graphics are amazing and the sound is great too. I honestly haven't played other COD games and I also see a lot negative reviews here.I cannot compare with other COD games but this one had pretty good graphics and was a great game to play.
    Expand
  23. Jun 26, 2020
    0
    Rewriting history, boring and outdated gameplay & game mechanics. Bad campaign Horrible zombies Multiplayer was ok for about 3 days then it got boring. And of course microtransactions...
  24. Jun 24, 2020
    7
    It is certainly better than all the other CoDs in recent years, but it still doesn't hold up with the original CoDs that took place during WW2.
  25. Jun 23, 2020
    8
    Reseña de la Campaña.
    JUGABILIDAD:
    Bastante buena, aunque un poco repetitiva. Existen algunas misiones que pretenden darle un aire fresco al shooter, y son buenas y bastante entretenidas. Aunque tampoco es para alardear. Todo el tiempo hay acción desenfrenada, y algunas partes puntuales podemos pasarlas con sigilo. La narrativa es espectacular, pero muy inconsistente. Cada misión
    Reseña de la Campaña.
    JUGABILIDAD:
    Bastante buena, aunque un poco repetitiva.
    Existen algunas misiones que pretenden darle un aire fresco al shooter, y son buenas y bastante entretenidas. Aunque tampoco es para alardear.

    Todo el tiempo hay acción desenfrenada, y algunas partes puntuales podemos pasarlas con sigilo.

    La narrativa es espectacular, pero muy inconsistente. Cada misión se siente como un mini juego y no como parte de una obra, lo cual afecta la experiencia en general. Tal vez si fuera un poco más largo se solucionarían los huecos, pero eso haría del juego AÚN MÁS repetitivo.

    La verdad es que es entretenido.

    GRÁFICOS:
    La narrativa es excelsa, y cada cinemática se disfruta como un proyecto completo en sí misma. Claro que con el problema del que ya hablaba.
    Así mismo, he de decir que aquellas en primera persona me han parecido superiores a cuando podemos ver al protagonista. Y eso es otro de los ejemplos sobre la inconsistencia del juego.

    Dentro del juego, el apartado gráfico es decente, con una buena ambientación y nivel de detalle. No obstante, todo es meramente un adorno puesto que hay realmente pocas cosas con las que interactuar.

    La gama de colores es acertada y se disfruta bien. La dirección de cámaras es muy buena y, en resumen, es un juego muy cinemático.

    SONIDO:
    Tiene algunas piezas decentes, pero realmente son opacadas por los "ruidos de guerra". No es precisamente malo, pero pudo ser mejor. Supongo.
    Es su apartado más descuidado, pero dada la temática tampoco es que perdamos demasiado.

    INNOVACIÓN:
    Es un shooter más. Uno entre miles.
    Expand
  26. Jun 22, 2020
    5
    In general this is a typical Call of Duty in all senses - from campaign to multiplayer.

    Single player - very simple story with obvious characters, storylane and levels. The graphics in a whole game is terrible ( maybe just on PS4), but cinematic videos in this part of game are impressive enough. If i saw only them, i would think of byiung this game earlier. Multiplayer - standart for
    In general this is a typical Call of Duty in all senses - from campaign to multiplayer.

    Single player - very simple story with obvious characters, storylane and levels. The graphics in a whole game is terrible ( maybe just on PS4), but cinematic videos in this part of game are impressive enough. If i saw only them, i would think of byiung this game earlier.

    Multiplayer - standart for CoD, just in WWII setting. It is interesting and exciting sometimes to play it, but not for a long time. Also there are too much cosmetic in it. Classic Activision and classic (boring) CoD.
    Expand
  27. Jun 21, 2020
    6
    An absolutely average game to the core. An instantly forgettable main campaign that takes us through D-Day...and a bunch of boring events after it, towards the end of WW2. The actual gameplay works well and the graphics are quite impressive at times, however the utter mediocrity that surrounds it makes the game boring, specially if u play it for more than an hour at a time. The multiplayerAn absolutely average game to the core. An instantly forgettable main campaign that takes us through D-Day...and a bunch of boring events after it, towards the end of WW2. The actual gameplay works well and the graphics are quite impressive at times, however the utter mediocrity that surrounds it makes the game boring, specially if u play it for more than an hour at a time. The multiplayer is ok for me, but I barely play multiplayer in general. Expand
  28. Jun 20, 2020
    7
    Hace años que no jugaba un Call of Duty. Me gustó la campaña pero nunca tanto para ponerle una nota verde. En el online no sé para qué pone en franco tiradores si los mapas son super chicos (pequeños).
  29. Jun 20, 2020
    7
    Un juego muy clásico de activition buen juego buena historia graficos y tema de la segunda guerra mundial misiones entretenidas y buen desarrollo mecanicas de siempre algo para jugar un dia aburrido o una campara juego muy caotico y clasico de los call of duty
  30. Jun 20, 2020
    6
    *Single Player Campaign Only* Sledgehammer's attempt at a gritty shooter set in World War 2 Europe had great promise. Unfortunately as things progressed through the campaign story, it devolved into your standard America is good narrative. The protagonists history with his brother and friends is never brought out as an arc but rather some throw away aspects in the script. Shooting mechanics*Single Player Campaign Only* Sledgehammer's attempt at a gritty shooter set in World War 2 Europe had great promise. Unfortunately as things progressed through the campaign story, it devolved into your standard America is good narrative. The protagonists history with his brother and friends is never brought out as an arc but rather some throw away aspects in the script. Shooting mechanics are just about fine. Overall it's a decent playthrough but no more. Expand
Metascore
79

Generally favorable reviews - based on 83 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 62 out of 83
  2. Negative: 0 out of 83
  1. CD-Action
    Jan 10, 2018
    70
    I really wanted CoD’s return to World War II to be something more than a solid game – but it’s not. I couldn’t shake the feeling that I’ve already seen all this, that the developers (or perhaps the publisher) chose to create something as safe as possible. There’s just one campaign mission that surprised me with its scale, the rest is just a disappointing “best of Call of Duty”. The multiplayer is as good as usual, but it was infused with unnecessary systems resembling mobile titles, e.g spending in-game currency on pointless tasks of the “kill 100 enemies” variety. Missions that make you watch other players open their loot boxes are the pinnacle of absurdity. [13/2017, p.64]
  2. Dec 22, 2017
    70
    A solid return to its roots, Call of Duty WWII reminds us what made us all fall in love Call of Duty in the first place. It ticks all the boxes which is both a blessing and a curse. Good fun and worth your time but offers nothing exceptional.
  3. Playstation Official Magazine UK
    Dec 15, 2017
    90
    Revitalised and exemplary FPS gaming. Multiplayer trims back to the essentials, campaign shows sensitivity and Zombies...well it's a new excuse to play CoD Zombies. [Christmas 2017, p.77]