Call of Duty: WWII

 PlayStation 4
User Score
5.1

Mixed or average reviews- based on 2065 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 718 out of 2065
  2. Mixed: 482 out of 2065
  3. Negative: 865 out of 2065
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. merengueti
    Nov 8, 2017
    1
    la verdad que el juego es un copia pega con algunas texturas cambiadas y poco mas, aparte el sistema de loot que la gente no quiere, lo han implementado para intentar engachar a la gente a los micropagos con sus politicas abusivas. te has lucido activision
  2. lufuxe
    Nov 8, 2017
    7
    Graphics: from the last parts there is a step forward, but if you peer into the textures, everything is bad ..
    Physics: bad, so is the physics of weapons .. they simply do not have ..
    Plot: I liked it
    That's why 7 points
  3. McEmow
    Nov 8, 2017
    0
    A full priced game with Free-to-play lootbox elements? Rewarding players in watching others opening lootboxes??? Are you kidding me? What is this nonsense. 1/10.
    Same old COD with a WW2 skin. The headquarter only exists for lootbox purpose. Nothing more.
  4. evani
    Nov 8, 2017
    3
    if you care at all about multiplayer then do not buy this cod, 9 maps 4 of which are decent the rest are average at best! the game play is also terrible combined with minimal gun management and perk customization, possibly the worst CoD MP i have ever played.
  5. Tenacidad963
    Nov 7, 2017
    0
    Este Call Of Duty es una burla a la inteligencia, puede tener en algunas partes buenos gráficos y pocos momentos buenos que contentan a los que no piden mucho a un juego. Sin embargo, malogran un hecho histórico muy importante al ponerle cajas de micropagos. Eliminan un momento que debería ser épico por ponerle en la cara al jugador su mala praxis de vender ítems que te ayudan, pero seEste Call Of Duty es una burla a la inteligencia, puede tener en algunas partes buenos gráficos y pocos momentos buenos que contentan a los que no piden mucho a un juego. Sin embargo, malogran un hecho histórico muy importante al ponerle cajas de micropagos. Eliminan un momento que debería ser épico por ponerle en la cara al jugador su mala praxis de vender ítems que te ayudan, pero se pierde el aspecto de inmersión. A pesar de tener gráficos actuales se ve como si fuera para niños. Entonces te das cuenta de que te subestiman como jugador, independientemente de que si ya has jugado a otros Call Of Duty´s. La campaña dura poco de entre 5 o 6 horas, el multijugador parece que le han puesto mucho entusiasmo parece que creen que el jugador es conformista y fácil de manejar.

    In English
    This Call Of Duty is a mockery to the intelligence, it can have in some parts good graphics and few good moments that please those who do not ask much for a game. However, they spoil a very important historical fact by putting boxes of micropayments. Eliminate a moment that should be epic for putting in the face of the player his bad practice of selling items that help you, but you lose the immersive aspect. Despite having current graphics it looks as if it were for children. Then you realize that they underestimate you as a player, regardless of whether you have already played other Call Of Duty's. The campaign lasts little between 5 or 6 hours, the multiplayer seems to have put a lot of enthusiasm seems to believe that the player is conformist and easy to handle.    … Expand
  6. Termin8ter
    Nov 7, 2017
    7
    Another year, another Call of Duty game. First off, the engine still needs to be rebuilt completely or shot on the spot, ok? Still using the Quake engine from 99? Really? The art team did a good job though. The gameplay still feels the same as it did ten years ago in Call of Duty 4, despite the massive change in setting. The campaign is quite good, quite lengthy as well. Better thanAnother year, another Call of Duty game. First off, the engine still needs to be rebuilt completely or shot on the spot, ok? Still using the Quake engine from 99? Really? The art team did a good job though. The gameplay still feels the same as it did ten years ago in Call of Duty 4, despite the massive change in setting. The campaign is quite good, quite lengthy as well. Better than Infinite Borefare and BO3's overly complicated plot. It's just a slimmed down, grounded war experience, and that I like. The multiplayer is mostly a very samey Call of Duty multiplayer experience that we have gotten since Modern Warfare, aside from the great new War mode, which is a fantastic addition. But it unfortunately doesn't quite save the multiplayer mode. Zombies. Sledgehammer's last crack at Zombies in AW only proved that only Treyarch could nail it correctly, so I was hoping they could save face here. I like how the mode feels like it's own beast and not a clone of BO3 zombies. The tone is very serious and mature, and that ascends the overly humorous tone of IW's zombies, which is great too. The gunplay itself is quite good, and I liked how the team opted for a proper campaign with horde sections, rather than repeating Treyarch's zombies mode. To be honest, the zombies is probably the best part of World War II. This game is definitely better than Destiny 2, and takes some strong strides in the right direction, but It doesn't earn a purchase at full price. I wouldn't get it for more than 15$.… Expand
  7. WeatherfordJac
    Nov 7, 2017
    0
    Lootboxes? Oh boy! I can't wait to feel like I'm playing on a crap phone game! Plus, the gameplay is lackluster and the story, as usual, is short and boring.
  8. BorderlineBunk
    Nov 7, 2017
    4
    I gave this game a 4 for the passable campaign and the barely adequate zombies mode, but GOD is multiplayer trash. I feel like I'm constantly playing this game in a state of lag where it feels like the same 4 bullets to kill take half the time for my enemies than it takes me. Its likely a result of their garbage peer to peer connectivity COD insists on implementing every game when gamesI gave this game a 4 for the passable campaign and the barely adequate zombies mode, but GOD is multiplayer trash. I feel like I'm constantly playing this game in a state of lag where it feels like the same 4 bullets to kill take half the time for my enemies than it takes me. Its likely a result of their garbage peer to peer connectivity COD insists on implementing every game when games like BF1 are just burying them in quality. This isn't even a Battlefield fanboy over here. I've been with COD since COD 2, but its blatantly obvious that they don't care about making a fun UNIQUE experience anymore and its just about **** on this years version of another subpar game. God just give up COD this is the nail in the coffin of the series for me. So done with their ****… Expand
  9. xCxJ
    Nov 7, 2017
    8
    WW2 Isn't a perfect game by any means but it has it's moments, graphics are really good, at least on the Pro. The single player campaign isn't anything spectacular but it's actually really decent for a CoD game, it definitely has it's moments and it can be challenging at times. It's a campaign that I personally could go back to and play it again. When it comes to the multiplayer, well,WW2 Isn't a perfect game by any means but it has it's moments, graphics are really good, at least on the Pro. The single player campaign isn't anything spectacular but it's actually really decent for a CoD game, it definitely has it's moments and it can be challenging at times. It's a campaign that I personally could go back to and play it again. When it comes to the multiplayer, well, it's just another CoD game, if you like CoD multiplayer then you'll like the multiplayer in WW2. The HQ is an interesting choice, it's really cool other than the fact that you can watch people opening loot boxes that fall from the sky...Overall, WW2 is a welcomed change compared to the past couple of years and I would recommend it to anyone who's a CoD fan and anyone who hasn't played any CoD games before but would like to get into the world of CoD, it's a good starting point. In my honest opinion and as someone who prefers Battlefield I will gladly give WW2 an 8.5/10… Expand
  10. SeptemberFly
    Nov 7, 2017
    7
    Call of Duty World War 2 is, well... It's a Call of Duty game. I haven't played a call of duty game since black ops 2, so it's been a good bit since I've played one of these games so this review is coming from someone with an outside perspective. Playing this game after a long break from the series, it still feels very much the same as when I stopped playing the series. The changes inCall of Duty World War 2 is, well... It's a Call of Duty game. I haven't played a call of duty game since black ops 2, so it's been a good bit since I've played one of these games so this review is coming from someone with an outside perspective. Playing this game after a long break from the series, it still feels very much the same as when I stopped playing the series. The changes in multiplayer feel very minor, as the experience felt about the same to me as it has always been. The only changes to multiplayer that I really noticed is that there's a hub area in multiplayer that you're in before going into a match and that transitioning to new matches feels a lot more seamless than it used to. However, the changes that were made are probably feel a lot more important to a hardcore call of duty fan than it was to me. The zombies mode in the game is very fun to play with friends. I didn't play too much of it, but the time I had with it was fun and I was surprised that they actually made a campaign out of it. The strongest part of Call of Duty WW2 to me was the main campaign. It feels like the Call of Duty campaigns fly under the radar, which I've always felt is unfortunate. Strange as it may sound, I think that the Call of Duty campaigns can be compared to the Marvel films. They feel like pretty standard cookie cutter stories that always play it pretty safe, but the experience is usually a good time and has characters you can feel attached to. Call of Duty WW2 uses this format as well, and it's probably one of the best campaigns in the entire series. It gives off a Saving Private Ryan kind of vibe, and includes many characters that you actually become attached to and care about what happens to them. The main protagonist Robert "Red" Daniels is one of the more interesting characters, who has a good backstory and his chemistry with the rest of the cast helps make the story remain engaging. Overall, Call of Duty WW2 feels like the same Call of Duty that we've always known it to be. The multiplayer feels the same as it did when I played it many years ago, as does almost every other area. If you are a Call of Duty fan who plays the game every year, you won't need my recommendation because Call of Duty fans will buy the game no matter what. As for other outsiders to the series like myself, I'd recommend either renting the game or waiting for the price to drop just to play the campaign or zombie mode, but I wouldn't pay full price for it.… Expand
  11. Vermelho_
    Nov 7, 2017
    10
    Played the whole single-player campaign, completed first easter egg in zombies, and level 40 in multiplayer. I Have enough to say that this game is quite perfect. The graphics for the previous CODs is nice, gameplay bringing the good old days back, and with changes so it doesn't get boring. I really don't know why people are hating this game but it sure made up to my expectations. For me,Played the whole single-player campaign, completed first easter egg in zombies, and level 40 in multiplayer. I Have enough to say that this game is quite perfect. The graphics for the previous CODs is nice, gameplay bringing the good old days back, and with changes so it doesn't get boring. I really don't know why people are hating this game but it sure made up to my expectations. For me, the best CODs ever were BO1, WaW, MWs. Is good to be back to a promising game.… Expand
  12. Xalon
    Nov 7, 2017
    1
    They screwed up the launch. That's unacceptable in the modern era, where this should be easily anticipated as these launches happen with regularity. Also, the game is horribly inaccurate. The guns are wrong and used by the wrong groups at the wrong times. There's heavy censorship. The characters are unlikable. The mechanics are annoying. WTF was I thinking giving another COD game aThey screwed up the launch. That's unacceptable in the modern era, where this should be easily anticipated as these launches happen with regularity. Also, the game is horribly inaccurate. The guns are wrong and used by the wrong groups at the wrong times. There's heavy censorship. The characters are unlikable. The mechanics are annoying. WTF was I thinking giving another COD game a chance? Pass on this at all costs.… Expand
  13. aaronaccidently
    Nov 7, 2017
    6
    How this game garners 8 and 9/10 scores is insane, and unless COD gets special handicap treatment for being such a heavyweight in game titles, it is not an accurate grade for the quality of this game.

    I was excited for COD WWII because I read it had team members from the original Deadspace, and the last COD WWII game, World at War was pretty good. I played through the first level,    How this game garners 8 and 9/10 scores is insane, and unless COD gets special handicap treatment for being such a heavyweight in game titles, it is not an accurate grade for the quality of this game.

    I was excited for COD WWII because I read it had team members from the original Deadspace, and the last COD WWII game, World at War was pretty good.

    I played through the first level, the D-day landing and it was okay, but no better than Allied Assault on PC a decade ago. As a historical shooter goes, Battlefield 1 is superior in every way. The Zombie mode is okay, but it's the same old same old deal. If you were expecting anything new or different...

    This is the best COD game I've played since the first Modern Warfare, but it still seems like a rushed/cheap wannabe triple a game. Considering it's nearly 2018, this game feels like it's a couple years old. I had no interest in multiplayer, so I didn't try it. Immediately swapped it in for Wolfenstien 2, which I hope is better.    … Expand
  14. AAT
    Nov 7, 2017
    0
    Multiplayer is not even close to history. COD still (for a 10+ years) doesn't have any dedicated servers. Still same old stupid multiplayer mechanic. Nothing new to me.
  15. fakkel
    Nov 7, 2017
    0
    Worse Cod game ever! Multiplayer= head glitching, Shoot first die first, Weapons with now weight behind them, poorly designed maps made for campers. GG well played
  16. PolleDK
    Nov 7, 2017
    3
    Once again the Cod franchise disappoints.....
    the game has amazing graphics and starts out really awesome, but after some short time the game just keeps coming up with RANDOM encounter of German soldiers that fight to the dead the 1 sec and surrender the next. the first mission has more action packed in the whole mission than the whole game of Modern warfare 2 and it makes it dull.. and    Once again the Cod franchise disappoints.....
    the game has amazing graphics and starts out really awesome, but after some short time the game just keeps coming up with RANDOM encounter of German soldiers that fight to the dead the 1 sec and surrender the next. the first mission has more action packed in the whole mission than the whole game of Modern warfare 2 and it makes it dull.. and to make it a lot worse the main story Glorifies the American Perverted vision on themselves in WW 2
    And whats up with all this STRONG independent Woman in games now a days!??! i can understand the women in the resistance but in the British special forces??? give me a break from all this feminist ****    … Expand
  17. EJSC_pt
    Nov 7, 2017
    9
    Best Call of Duty I ever played.

    The game is very gun-skill based, unlike the previous versions. It rewards the player with better aim on close quarters gunfights. If you don´t have reflexes or good aim you will not kill your enemy. And that is how a shooter should be, just like Quake. Most of the users hating on the game, are just doing it because they are either bad players or    Best Call of Duty I ever played.

    The game is very gun-skill based, unlike the previous versions.

    It rewards the player with better aim on close quarters gunfights. If you don´t have reflexes or good aim you will not kill your enemy. And that is how a shooter should be, just like Quake.

    Most of the users hating on the game, are just doing it because they are either bad players or they hate cod overall and like to contribute for a low score user rating.

    The numbers don´t lie, this is the best selling CoD ever on launch already, on console, and the most played CoD on PC ever. There is a reason for that. The game is good, skilled. If you´re not good at it, you will not like it. You can go back to casual and slow Battlefield or Pubg for a different experience.    … Expand
  18. c9sasza
    Nov 7, 2017
    0
    Lootboxes and trailer from dlc map before game come out? I must say no i sold this after beat campain in 5 hours.Zombie is good but you buy season pass other way you got only one map
  19. BlakDak666
    Nov 6, 2017
    4
    Call of Duty has been a series that has struggled to stay relevant in recent years due to a shift in the futuristic styles that people have come to dislike and loathe. As a player to the franchise since COD4 and playing pretty much every COD since, I have absolute confidence in saying that this game is hot garbage and if this is the direction and attitude it has chosen, then I am trulyCall of Duty has been a series that has struggled to stay relevant in recent years due to a shift in the futuristic styles that people have come to dislike and loathe. As a player to the franchise since COD4 and playing pretty much every COD since, I have absolute confidence in saying that this game is hot garbage and if this is the direction and attitude it has chosen, then I am truly done with this series for good. I will breakdown the campaign, multiplayer and zombies and give my thoughts on them:

    Campaign - This is easily one of the worst COD campaigns and maybe even worse campaigns as a whole to a game I have ever played. Maybe this is because I'm a history major and researching WW2 as a teen but this genuine trash. The narrative struggles to be either a Band of Brothers style or a over the top action film you'd see from Michael Bay, with explosions and scenes of "loud explosion following ears ringing and dude pulling you on your feet" scattered in too many times. The characters are mostly cardboard cutouts that have no real personality, depth or weight to the situation and their abilities you use in combat are more frustrating and gimmicky than satisfying. The mission variety is typical COD design: boring shooting galleries of killing scores of people with little to no reaction, QTEs and gimmicky additions like tank and plane escorts that don't bring out the full potential it should. The authenticity of WW2 is pretty much trashed; it takes place in 1944-1945, which is invalidating most of the war (in which the first three CODs and World at War did correctly), the Allied forces are largely set aside for the American v.s. Nazis clash and more as gimmicky tokenism of cultures that disrespect their service (despite the opening clearly stating over 50 countries fought and left 65 million dead), characters don't act realistic to the situation, hitmarkers, retreading the same exact structure as other CODs before it. The climax and ending was forced and tonally out of place. It's trash and deserves no love and only scorn. I don't care that people only buy it for the multiplayer; if you put something in your game you want those players to play that in their game. Case closed. 3/10

    Multiplayer- Standard COD multiplayer with a WW2 skin. It wasn't like COD 2 or 3 had great multiplayers anyways, it was COD 4 that put COD on the map in the first place. The game modes are still the same, the division system is pointless as you can pick any gun you want anyways, war mode is weak on operations, the inclusion of PC friendly race and gender options instantly destroys any authenticity this game claims to have, a **** hub world copy and paste from Destiny, loot boxes that fall from the sky and promote gambling and skinner box mentality that is abhorrent and should be scorned deeply. I suppose if you play with friends there can be some fun to be had and it feels more grounded compared to the last entries, but it doesn't do anything new that is concerning and by my fifth match I was already bored and wanted to play something else. Also add connectivity issues at launch and you got a fine example of a rushed product. 4/10

    Zombies- Usually my favorite mode COD ever has and in some ways is the best to date. I like some of the changes made to the design of the game, but I unfortunately couldn't help to feel that it is too easy (as a vet of zombies since 2008). The characters aren't interesting and boring; their constant breathing and gasping becomes grating and annoying after awhile. The zombies themselves lose their dark charm quickly and their voicework makes them goofier than what should be (since I thought this was going to be a far more edgier zombies). Loot boxes in this mode is pointless and extremely ****. With it being easy and being able to get to high rounds with little challenge, I honestly felt bored and wall guns are just powerful as mystery box guns, completely making it pointless to use. The most disappointing part is each past zombies game (WAW and the Black Op series) had ideas that never got here despite being worth the inclusion. The human like models of WAW, the extra maps from BO1, the passive perks you get and the bank system in BO2 and gumballs in BO3 all could have been in this game, but isnt. The single map at launch is insulting and even with friends it can only last so long before you get bored. Decent overall. 6/10

    The game will have microtransactions, has a season pass and generally feels like 'another Call of Duty', no matter if it returns to its roots or not. I am sick and tired of this series, the greed behind it and the stupid masses (myself included) who buy these games anymore and pass it off as dudebro topics. I gave COD a chance and after a decade, it's time to throw in the towel for any hope for the series. COD definitely has found its roots, but to grow a big nasty parasite of a plant instead of the hopeful tree of originality and charm. 4/10 overall. DO NOT BUY THIS GAME.    … Expand
  20. tetetoto
    Nov 6, 2017
    10
    all time best blockbuster came back ! It's perfect resurrection of old school. Must play for WW2 lovers. Wish to ask Cons is there other FPS game instead of this.
  21. sityoazzdown
    Nov 6, 2017
    8
    After the abomination that was infinite warfare, I had little hype for this game ( I also bought this game accidentally on psn). But I must say after beating the campaign and putting in 5 hours into the multiplayer I can say this game is good. The campaign is amazing and easily a 9/10 for me. The gunplay is great, the journey (story) and pacing/variety in the campaign is amazing. TheAfter the abomination that was infinite warfare, I had little hype for this game ( I also bought this game accidentally on psn). But I must say after beating the campaign and putting in 5 hours into the multiplayer I can say this game is good. The campaign is amazing and easily a 9/10 for me. The gunplay is great, the journey (story) and pacing/variety in the campaign is amazing. The characters are believable and likeable and for some reason the graphics in the campaign is amazing, whilst the multiplayer looks last gen. I like how we switched between characters (kinda like gta 5) depending on the circumstances; and the surprise and smile on my face when we got to fight in the skies was great. It also has amazing blockbuster driving sequences and explosive sequences that are really fresh and jaw-dropping. I can't like and recommend this campaign enough. Fun diverse gameplay, captivating journey, amazing cutscenes; campaign is definately a 9/10. Now the multiplayer is serviceable but it's only serviceable because they slapped a COD on it. Maps are a **** which promotes camping, 80% of it's map are too small and feel like mazes. The divisions are a disappointment and takes away player freedom. Guns feel/look/ sound too similar too each other. Typical COD playlist. Positives on multiplayer: will be dominated by veterans, more tactical and not as much run and gun, is satisfying when you're on a killstreak. Multiplayer was ok for me and is a generous 6/10. In a nutshell I want to say buy/rent (if you want) for the campaign and treat the serviceable mp as a treat. However if you're buying COD just for multiplayer I would advise skip it, (well it depends what type of gamer you are, definitely skip if you want 100 hours into mp type of game, as I feel this MP will grow stale quick.)… Expand
  22. Peptide
    Nov 6, 2017
    9
    Lets get one thing clear....more than 75% of all the negative reviews are from trolls. Most of the remainder are Mario gamers who do not like CoD anyway.
    This game is awesome. Its fun to play. There is a lot of variety in the MP part. Between the MP, Zombies, and the campaign, there is an enormous amount of polished content for the price. I'll take this over Destiny or Overwatch or    Lets get one thing clear....more than 75% of all the negative reviews are from trolls. Most of the remainder are Mario gamers who do not like CoD anyway.
    This game is awesome. Its fun to play. There is a lot of variety in the MP part. Between the MP, Zombies, and the campaign, there is an enormous amount of polished content for the price. I'll take this over Destiny or Overwatch or any BF game anyday. And the campaign is fantastic.    … Expand
  23. The_XIII
    Nov 6, 2017
    6
    The game is far from perfect, and honestly not that enjoyable in the long rung. But you know what's hilarious? Reading these severly autistic kids crying about black women in videogames.
  24. id_archer
    Nov 6, 2017
    4
    графоний растворился в мыльце...(( и чуство что я в это уже играл не как не покидает меня
  25. thaesino
    Nov 6, 2017
    7
    (Disclaimer: I will not comment on microstransactions, nor take that into account when reviewing this game, as it is our fault, the gamers, that these publishers have gotten away with such things. Placing a bad rating on the Developers' hard work due to the greed of the Publishers and the ignorance of the Players, would not do justice to any of the many AAA titles riddled with(Disclaimer: I will not comment on microstransactions, nor take that into account when reviewing this game, as it is our fault, the gamers, that these publishers have gotten away with such things. Placing a bad rating on the Developers' hard work due to the greed of the Publishers and the ignorance of the Players, would not do justice to any of the many AAA titles riddled with microtransactions or DLC. If you want them out, STOP PAYING FOR THEM. YOU ARE THE ONES PAYING FOR THEM TO BE THERE.)

    Let me make this short and break it down into three sections: Call of Duty: WW2, the game; Call of Duty: WW2, the Comparisons; and, Call of Duty: WW2, the Community.

    --- The Game: This is a game which can be easily scored anywhere between 5 and 8, depending on your mood, on your common sense, on your intelligence, or on your need to defend your purchase of this game, or to attack it in order to defend your purchase of another game (i.e. BF1, Destiny 2). The Campaign is good, albeit short. The MP is exactly like the Beta, plus the usual millions of microtransaction options which just keep getting cleverer and cleverer.

    --- The Comparisons: This game is not BF1. It has great visuals and good voice acting/writing. However, because it is not BF1, it also moves faster, which is great. BECAUSE it moves faster, it does not need to look as good. No one buys a game like this in order to stare at puddles in the mud, that's what games like Horizon: Zero Dawn are for. People compare for various reasons, not the least of which is, they simply don't know what they want anymore... and it is not our fault. Publishers and Critics and even YouTubers swing us left and right (bet they have fun doing it) for the sake of a sale, or for the sake of a sponsorship. In the end, so many people ended up buying Infinite Warfare BECAUSE of MW:RE... so it didn't matter. Activision won. Yay! And so did DICE/EA, because they also bought BF1. And so did Blizzard (Activision's merge), because they also bought Overwatch. And there go more than $180.

    The Community: I'll lay it flat. Go anywhere. Whether here on Meta, or YouTube, or the Activision community, or just on the mics on PS4 and you'll reach the same conclusion I have reached: Call of Duty has been hijacked by children, and this is here to stay. Children, because, well, that is what children do, are not the best at playing well, although if you don't take the game too seriously, you'll be fine, since they are pretty good at just having plain fun in ridiculous ways, without worrying about dying or having their teammates killed, etc etc, and heck... since when did we get so serious about games?

    Enjoy this game if you bought/buy it. That's all I can say. I couldn't enjoy it, but notice my score. My personal experience doesn't change what I see to be a solid COD experience, like in the past with MW and MW2.    … Expand
  26. TomasLacerda
    Nov 6, 2017
    0
    For the sake of you wallet, DO NOT. BUY. THIS GAME.

    The story is dangerously inaccurate. The characters are as predictable as every bad movie you ever seen. Lifeless, idiotic bunch. The A.I. is surprising awful for a 2017 game, even for a 2014 game would be an issue. There's no ambience to the game, constantly being stopped by irrelevant cutscenes. This game isn't made for adults.    For the sake of you wallet, DO NOT. BUY. THIS GAME.

    The story is dangerously inaccurate. The characters are as predictable as every bad movie you ever seen. Lifeless, idiotic bunch. The A.I. is surprising awful for a 2017 game, even for a 2014 game would be an issue. There's no ambience to the game, constantly being stopped by irrelevant cutscenes. This game isn't made for adults.

    Don't play it.    … Expand
  27. eYeArr
    Nov 6, 2017
    0
    I got this game on day one, the best thing so far is amazon delivery service, lets point out some stuff:

    Negative The size of the installation is HUGE Connecting to play day 1, 2 3, was impossible After it managed to connect the view of the guns is awful, when you have 2,3 4 games with other optics it really sucks. The teams respawn on the same side almost all the game its all so    I got this game on day one, the best thing so far is amazon delivery service, lets point out some stuff:

    Negative
    The size of the installation is HUGE
    Connecting to play day 1, 2 3, was impossible
    After it managed to connect the view of the guns is awful, when you have 2,3 4 games with other optics it really sucks.
    The teams respawn on the same side almost all the game its all so lineal, what makes camping the most common thing.
    Killing its hard dying is easy
    The zombie mode is boring and you get 10000000 points of life, it gets so boring after round 15
    The maps are really with good texture but not enjoyable

    Goods
    Maps graphics
    Campaign

    I am selling or returning this game, it really sucks I am very very dissapointed.    … Expand
  28. Jumballi
    Nov 6, 2017
    0
    Rather than innovate, they simply went back and repackaged the previous game and just took out the super jumps. The only innovation is the fact they made loot boxes more toxic than any game before it.
  29. dexter3
    Nov 6, 2017
    6
    I've been playing this game since COD 3. Here's what I think:

    Campaign: I have found it to be decently fun. Not an amazing experience, not horrible either. There are some people complaining about realism. If you're looking for realism, you shouldn't be playing COD. It's the same type of COD campaign that we've seen in most of the games. Multiplayer: The new war mode is the most fun I    I've been playing this game since COD 3. Here's what I think:

    Campaign: I have found it to be decently fun. Not an amazing experience, not horrible either. There are some people complaining about realism. If you're looking for realism, you shouldn't be playing COD. It's the same type of COD campaign that we've seen in most of the games.

    Multiplayer: The new war mode is the most fun I have had in COD for a long time. It's freaking awesome!! Your KD doesn't matter so it really encourages the team to play the objective. It very much takes after Battlefield One (a lot of the game does), but that doesn't bother me because I enjoy this game mode very much. If taking the positive elements from other games bothers you, you might have a problem with this. The downside is there are only 3 war maps and 9 regular MP maps... way too few. I have not experienced any server problems, my matchmaking times have been basically instant (I'm not denying the problem, I'm saying the people who come here are generally the ones who want to complain so you're going to read about more problems than good things). The rest of the MP is not very different, so if you've played any other COD game you know what to expect. Except gun camos are like COD4 which is fantastic. Gun balance is good and sniping is really fun so good job on that.

    Zombies: Only one real map so far which is pretty disappointing. The map itself is pretty good though. I like the changes to zombies. Blitz machines replace perks, armor replaces Juggernog and gets more expensive each time you buy it, which is a welcome and challenging change. The zombie types are varied (there are 5 main types, plus a boss you can fight), and are done cleverly. The zombies are quite different than old BO and BO2 zombies. The music is phenomenal at the beginning and really adds to the horror of the game, but I found it getting annoying after a while and turned it off. They have added a real progression system which is great. You can unlock and equip perks (mods) and start with new starting guns, unlock attachments, etc.

    -----

    Other points:

    - The UI is horrible. It is the worst UI I have seen in a COD game. It is extremely counterintuitive and I find myself constantly searching too long for what I want. Maybe I'm too used to the old menus, but this one is just poorly laid out.
    - Microtransactions are a disease in gaming and every game with them deserves a lower score. Please DO NOT BUY THEM.
    - SPLITSCREENERS BEWARE: The splitscreen is completely broken. The things that pop on screen (objective lost, pick up gun, etc.) are HUGE and completely block your view. It's like no one even tested this. It's so so bad. It has great potential but they need to make everything way smaller. I have a 65' TV and it is very difficult to play splitscreen. I really hope they fix this.
    - Graphics are in the middle. Obviously there are better looking games but it does the job for me.
    - The content is high quality for COD standards, but there's not much of it. Not a whole bunch of guns and not very many maps. Campaign is short.
    - SJW stuff is a sad sad part of the world now, and breaks some of the immersion.    … Expand
  30. se7enX90X
    Nov 6, 2017
    5
    -Some of the worst multiplayer maps in the call of duty franchise. Majority of your deaths will come from being shot from behind due to awful map design.

    -When this game was first announced Sledgehammer lied to the world by saying they were making an authentic WWII game that was going to be true to the war and as accurate and realistic as possible....That was a big fat lie.    -Some of the worst multiplayer maps in the call of duty franchise. Majority of your deaths will come from being shot from behind due to awful map design.

    -When this game was first announced Sledgehammer lied to the world by saying they were making an authentic WWII game that was going to be true to the war and as accurate and realistic as possible....That was a big fat lie.

    -Censorship in a game that's supposed to be for adults is inappropriate. Sledgehammer has no right to tell others what's too sensitive to view and what's not. Hiding swastikas in a game about WWII is just immature and illogical on Sledgehammer and Activision's part.

    -The outdated connection service they use is really showing just how outdated it is. A mass amount of people that bought the game cannot connect to the servers. The fact that Activision makes literally billions of dollars a year from their gambling crates but still use the cheapest possible multiplayer service is disgusting...

    When its all said and done this game could've been amazing. Sledgehammer could've created a masterpiece and proved to everybody that they really don't just make these games on a yearly basis as a cash grab. They dropped the ball and WWII is the result. I've been playing cod for over 10 years and after the amount of disappointment I received from WWII, I'm officially done with the franchise. Won't be contributing to a company like Activision who is 100% anti consumer.    … Expand
Page:

Awards & Rankings

82
#82 Best PS4 Game of 2017
9
#9 Most Discussed PS4 Game of 2017
9
#9 Most Shared PS4 Game of 2017

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
79

Generally favorable reviews - based on 83 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 62 out of 83
  2. Mixed: 21 out of 83
  3. Negative: 0 out of 83
  1. CD-Action
    Jan 10, 2018
    70
    I really wanted CoD’s return to World War II to be something more than a solid game – but it’s not. I couldn’t shake the feeling that I’ve already seen all this, that the developers (or perhaps the publisher) chose to create something as safe as possible. There’s just one campaign mission that surprised me with its scale, the rest is just a disappointing “best of Call of Duty”. The multiplayer is as good as usual, but it was infused with unnecessary systems resembling mobile titles, e.g spending in-game currency on pointless tasks of the “kill 100 enemies” variety. Missions that make you watch other players open their loot boxes are the pinnacle of absurdity. [13/2017, p.64]
  2. The Digital Fix
    Dec 22, 2017
    70
    A solid return to its roots, Call of Duty WWII reminds us what made us all fall in love Call of Duty in the first place. It ticks all the boxes which is both a blessing and a curse. Good fun and worth your time but offers nothing exceptional.
    Read full review
  3. Playstation Official Magazine UK
    Dec 15, 2017
    90
    Revitalised and exemplary FPS gaming. Multiplayer trims back to the essentials, campaign shows sensitivity and Zombies...well it's a new excuse to play CoD Zombies. [Christmas 2017, p.77]
See all critic reviews »