Metascore
79

Generally favorable reviews - based on 15 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 10 out of 15
  2. Negative: 0 out of 15
  1. Mar 24, 2020
    70
    Having 150 players slows down the game too much for my liking, but additions like the Gulag and the new game mode Plunder are great ways to keep the experience fresh instead of copying old trends.
  2. Mar 24, 2020
    70
    Warzone is a fine example of how you can iterate on a formula and improve it, but remove the heart of something by playing it a little too safe. Blackout covered up the surgical cleanliness at its core with zombies and over-the-top items. Warzone has no such crutch, leaving it fighting the good fight, but for no real reason. Overall, it’s fun but it lacks the style of its contenders. Given a choice, I’d go for the wise-cracking idiot over the well-dressed business person every single time, and Warzone is definitely the latter. Classic Leonard.
  3. Mar 20, 2020
    70
    In spite of the serious concessions to depth made in the name of instant gratification, Call of Duty: Warzone’s beta remains thoroughly enjoyable. The battle royale formula is intact, albeit some of the aspects that usually make it so exciting and replayable are muted here. I’d love to see a reason to try something other than my Modern Warfare multiplayer loadout in the future given how easy it is to acquire, and think that the armor plate system and gulag are in need of revision. But my time spent in Verdask was still supremely fun even if the how and the why of it didn’t matter all that much.
  4. Mar 19, 2020
    70
    Warzone is a great sophomore attempt at a battle royale from Call of Duty, which finally manages to carve out its own identity with interesting spins on the existing formula. Its subversion of death and the nail-biting Gulag duels give you more ways to stay in a match, while also forcing you to be aware of your surroundings even after wiping a rival squad. Its looting is streamlined enough to make early moments feel fast, but Warzone also loses some of the messy magic from hobbled together loadouts by letting you drop in prebuilt ones far too easily and frequently. Still, if you're comfortable with Call of Duty's latest iteration of multiplayer antics and thrive in the stressful setting of battle royales, Warzone is a strong contender for your attention.
  5. Mar 17, 2020
    70
    Having played Fortnite, Apex Legends, PUBG, and other battle royales extensively, I can safely say Call of Duty: Warzone does a lot of things that really make me happy.
This publication does not provide a score for their reviews.
This publication has not posted a final review score yet.
These unscored reviews do not factor into the Metascore calculation.
  1. Mar 11, 2020
    Even after just a few hours of gameplay it’s obvious that this is an important contender in the battle royale genre. Whether interest will quickly fizzle out, as happened with Blackout, remains to be seen but the early signs suggest Warzone will rage on for some time to come. [First Impressions Review]
  2. May 16, 2020
    A competent, mechanically enjoyable shooter that suffers from aesthetic blandness and a quiet, drab atmosphere. Basically, it's a Call of Duty battle royale game.
  3. Apr 16, 2020
    Most importantly, it's platform agnostic, meaning you can play with your friends even if none of you own the same console or a PC. As long as you can play the game, you can easily join a group of friends no matter what platform they're on.
User Score
4.0

Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 1107 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Mar 10, 2020
    10
    Even with only having 3's at the moment this game is all you could want in a BR. Amazing game that I think could carry on for years with updates.
  2. Mar 14, 2020
    0
    a piece of **** ****
    I play on the PC, I can’t understand if the developers really are such **** that they couldn’t optimize the game.
    a piece of **** ****
    I play on the PC, I can’t understand if the developers really are such **** that they couldn’t optimize the game.
    According to system requirements, the game should go at 100 fps. And in the end I see 30-50 fps regardless of the level of graphics. Although in the beta version of the game I had all 100fps. I do not want to compare, but in rdr2 on ultra graphics settings I have 80 fps.
    Draw conclusions which of the developers have tried for the sake of their fans.
    P.S.
    no seriously, you are not even interested in the opinions of your fans. You didn’t even enter reviews. How do you know about a crap made game if you don’t want to know the opinion of the fans. You can’t even do 4: 3 resolution. Why the developers of rdr2 did everything, but you stuck a dildak in the ass and keep quiet. Only a **** gay communist is capable of this. I even had to register here to express my opinion.
    Full Review »
  3. Apr 29, 2020
    0
    I would love to say something good about this game but I never had a chance to actually play it. I was attempting to download it twice and II would love to say something good about this game but I never had a chance to actually play it. I was attempting to download it twice and I always stuck on an update part. First time an error they were fixing for weeks, and second time downloading speed restrictions because I living in a wrong part of the world?? What a racist approach.
    But funny enough this whole situation just reassured me that not buying their games is a right decision.
    Full Review »