Call of Duty: Black Ops III

 PlayStation 4
User Score
5.3

Mixed or average reviews- based on 2841 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 1,091 out of 2841
  2. Mixed: 597 out of 2841
  3. Negative: 1,153 out of 2841
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. Get_Gud_Bruh
    Feb 1, 2016
    8
    First off, let's talk about value:
    1) You have campaign. I'm not such a fan with campaign since blops2 and I can't say that I will consider story mode at all even in this particular CoD. This does give a feature like WaW that allows you to play Co-op campaign which is nostalgia and great addition that should've been with every CoD game since WaW but failed in its predecessors.
    2)    First off, let's talk about value:
    1) You have campaign. I'm not such a fan with campaign since blops2 and I can't say that I will consider story mode at all even in this particular CoD. This does give a feature like WaW that allows you to play Co-op campaign which is nostalgia and great addition that should've been with every CoD game since WaW but failed in its predecessors.

    2) Multiplayer - the icing on the cake that I play that seems to be balanced, almost too balanced. The maps are a bit basic making the game almost too simple which make the 3-way map design generic. Sniping from blops2 aim assist is gone making it a diluted game play w/o snipers. Every game lobby you enter will have smgs or ARs, which loses its luster after 2 months of playing this game continuously.

    3) Zombie and arcade zombie: these are additions to the game which makes this game pretty valuable across the board.

    4) innovation: You get the new mode called Free Run. Although there's not a lot going on it it is a step in the right direction as for innovation. It's stepping into boundaries of another game called Mirror's Edge which is something to be excited about. I wish they put more of an effort for this particular mode like Co-op and racing against others as well as shadow AI to see how players above you completed this course.

    I'm surprised at all that people are giving such low credit for this game as it is quite valuable for what they're giving you. Yes, it is quantity over quality, but allowing 4 games in one is still worth the price even when it's dropping substantially.

    Multiplayer:

    This is pretty much the only game mode I play, which says a lot about me, however I have tried all modes before giving this review. The multiplayer isn't as good as previous CoD games like blops2 or MW2. I feel as though this should've been released before AW as well to give people the chance to progress through y-axis movement. If anything this is an upgrade to blops2 with much slower gameplay even with boost movement is involved. The maps feel smaller than any of the basic previous Treyarch maps from blops1, blops2, and WaW. For maps being this small w/boost movements I must say they put things in a pickle.

    The game, again, is balanced. Almost too balanced. Shotguns aren't good anymore making them almost useless when it comes to basic TDM. Even the argus takes real skill for it to be par with the worst smg. Almost all ARs and smgs are relatively close to being the same weapon with minor tweaks like higher rpm, better recoil or more damage. It's like they had a basic semi and gave the gun points for auto, damage, recoil, magazine, and rpm while making different combinations using the same point system just for guns to make their guns.

    Sniping is low tier due to the fact that aim assist is gone. Anyone who still uses sniper rifles in this particular CoD is using pure skill at this point. LMGs feel extremely heavy compared to blops2, but w/perk manipulation that some of the pubstompers have figured out you can use it almost like an AR. But because this game is faster paced for smgs to rule the game using LMG is outclassed in most situations besides modes like Domination and safeguard.

    I'm giving the game higher than 7 because of its value. If it didn't include the extra mode freerun I would've given it just 7 because it would've been a lesser version of blops2. I can't say this game for multiplayer is better than blops2 because of how generic the gameplay feels and the bland feeling that my opponent is either wielding an smg or AR rather than go shotgunning, knifing, sniper rifle or LMG.    … Expand
  2. louishaishi
    Feb 2, 2016
    5
    I haven't played the other black ops game, so I don't know the trend or how a black ops game should be like.

    In terms of shooting, ok. Controls are fine, not that many guns to choose from. The enemies blend in with the graphics and allies, you don't know who you are suppose to shoot, until they come close enough or they are the pointing the gun at you. I end up using the weird goggle    I haven't played the other black ops game, so I don't know the trend or how a black ops game should be like.

    In terms of shooting, ok. Controls are fine, not that many guns to choose from.

    The enemies blend in with the graphics and allies, you don't know who you are suppose to shoot, until they come close enough or they are the pointing the gun at you. I end up using the weird goggle device, so all the bad guys are in red.

    A great couch co-op game. Had loads of fun. Not sure if it works great if you play alone.

    Dont know about the story, dont give a **** As long as I am progressing, have all the levels and maps, that's fine. The only down side is you cannot replay the levels, unless you restart all over again.

    Zombie is a great mode, but no story for that... It's like a survival mode, where you fight waves of enemies over and over. For some reason, I cannot skip the cutscenes right away. I have to watch 30 seconds of it before I can skip, so annoying and boring. I watched it already. I just want to play the damn game.

    Dont know much about the online multiplayer, local one is fine.    … Expand
  3. Slingy
    Feb 17, 2016
    7
    This game i believe to attempt to come back to call of duty's roots but its no Modern Warfare 1 or 2 but it does introduce a couple of improved mechanics from the old call of duty games and is leaps better than the previous two installments and i believe they are heading in the right direction, although what I just discussed is true it does have its flaws as this game does a bit better jobThis game i believe to attempt to come back to call of duty's roots but its no Modern Warfare 1 or 2 but it does introduce a couple of improved mechanics from the old call of duty games and is leaps better than the previous two installments and i believe they are heading in the right direction, although what I just discussed is true it does have its flaws as this game does a bit better job at bringing the community back together it still in some ways drives them further apart with the movement system which is something i enjoyed and much better than advanced warfare's bunny hoping simulator it leads me to give this game a 7/10, as its not bad and improves on the last two games of the series which made the franchise lose a lot of its customers… Expand
  4. municxx
    Mar 5, 2016
    1
    Was quite looking forward to this but am quite dissapointed with the campaign, its beautiful graphics but it feels flat and at times feels quite lost. The multiplayer is the same as any other COD.
  5. jtpduffe
    Mar 17, 2016
    10
    clearing out old review....................................................................................................................................
  6. SrPepe
    Jul 6, 2018
    5
    Un juego correcto y divertido que no supera la media. La campaña en pesadilla con amigos es muy divertida de jugar, además de larga y MUY sufrida; tiene unos gráficos muy buenos.
    El online es aceptable, pero partida por medio hay un error, tenes que cerrar el juego o volver para atrás, los problemas con los hosts de Black Ops 2 se trasladan a este, con mapas aburridos y muy por debajo del    Un juego correcto y divertido que no supera la media. La campaña en pesadilla con amigos es muy divertida de jugar, además de larga y MUY sufrida; tiene unos gráficos muy buenos.
    El online es aceptable, pero partida por medio hay un error, tenes que cerrar el juego o volver para atrás, los problemas con los hosts de Black Ops 2 se trasladan a este, con mapas aburridos y muy por debajo del nivel de la anterior entrega, horrible el multiplayer.    … Expand
  7. fuky
    May 5, 2016
    5
    Just finished the campaign and honestly was a let down. The story was a messed and didn't make sense...most call of duty games suffer from poor campaigns, but this one is the worst of any game.

    Don't try playing campaign co-op I have a really good 55" TV and it looked like ****

    The multiplayer is not that good, mostly run, run, kill, kill, die, run, kill. No strategy and almost zero skills.
  8. loveling
    May 12, 2016
    3
    I do not want to talk about this, but Call of Duty is repeated too much and had declined in recent years, but the plot is good, only 4.6 points is intended for the plot, the rest is not worth mentioning because too boring for the future war .
  9. Henvak
    Apr 21, 2016
    6
    Puede que sea el mejor call of duty de nueva generación, (Solo he probado este en PS4) Unos gráficos decentes aunque mejorables, (La iluminación de los exteriores junto al cielo y el paisaje de fondo para mi es lo peor del multijugador, y hablo de los mapas que vienen por defecto en el juego, algunos mapas del primer dlc arreglan estos fallos, para mi punto de vista deberían arreglarloPuede que sea el mejor call of duty de nueva generación, (Solo he probado este en PS4) Unos gráficos decentes aunque mejorables, (La iluminación de los exteriores junto al cielo y el paisaje de fondo para mi es lo peor del multijugador, y hablo de los mapas que vienen por defecto en el juego, algunos mapas del primer dlc arreglan estos fallos, para mi punto de vista deberían arreglarlo porque la iluminación es bastante molesta) también me hubiera gustado una opción para alejar la cámara, para ser nueva generación tener la cámara tan cerca me parece un mareo continuo. La campaña me a parecido buena, junto con el primer Black Ops son las historias que mas me han gustado de todos los call of dutys que he probado que no son pocos (MW2/3, BO1/2/3), otro defecto del multijugador son las cajas de suministros, han sacado como 9 o 10 armas y si no te salen no las vas a probar nunca, me parece un error grave que no las den de regalo (ya les pagabamos bien para que luego no nos den esas cosas) me parece bien las cajas de suministros para trajes y camuflajes pero para las armas no. Yo personalmente estoy muy quemado de los shooters y dudo que me compre otro hasta dentro de mucho tiempo aun así me parece un buen juego, y la nota que le pongo me parece la mas justa… Expand
  10. mynxmeis
    Apr 22, 2016
    7
    Call Of Duty Black Ops 3 -

    I am not impressed with how C.o.D has made Black Ops 3, It has failed to bring what the community has asked for (World at War 2?) The realism in the game is not impressive and the game is too colorful and bright , not army-like at all. Apart from that the games runs smoothly, along with keeping the game fast-paced with a new zombies experience. I have a    Call Of Duty Black Ops 3 -

    I am not impressed with how C.o.D has made Black Ops 3, It has failed to bring what the community has asked for (World at War 2?) The realism in the game is not impressive and the game is too colorful and bright , not army-like at all.

    Apart from that the games runs smoothly, along with keeping the game fast-paced with a new zombies experience. I have a PlayStation 4 with BO3 with the season pass so I can maintain all the new DLC.

    I am happy with the game, but i prefer the classic C.o.D games instead.    … Expand
  11. Clorox_drinker
    May 12, 2016
    6
    Pro's: Campagin Co-Op, Dead Ops Arcade 2, Multiplayer specialists,
    Con's: Exo's, Generic Campaign Very Boring, Nightmares, Zombies doesn't feel fun anymore, --
    Supply drops make multiplayer unbalanced
  12. BoatyMcBoatFace
    May 17, 2016
    3
    Pros: Very good graphics and physics, mediocre addictiveness

    Cons: Terrible Campaign, Terrible creativity to guns, not creative with maps.

    I wouldn't get this game if I were you.
  13. MisterJonny
    May 23, 2016
    5
    El mejor call of duty que llevamos de generación, pero no esta a la altura, después de 3 años de desarrollo contamos solamente con un modo historia (eso si, de cuatro jugadores), multijugador con mapas reciclados y bastante sosos en su mayoría, con armas refritas, y la misma formula de siempre, en el apartado zombie... Solamente un mapa, muy decepcionante, en fin, aprueba por ser mejor queEl mejor call of duty que llevamos de generación, pero no esta a la altura, después de 3 años de desarrollo contamos solamente con un modo historia (eso si, de cuatro jugadores), multijugador con mapas reciclados y bastante sosos en su mayoría, con armas refritas, y la misma formula de siempre, en el apartado zombie... Solamente un mapa, muy decepcionante, en fin, aprueba por ser mejor que Ghost (que no es muy difícil) y acaba de mejorar el movimiento futurista de Advanced Warfare. Aparte del modo Dead Ops Arcade si no recuerdo mal y la campaña de zombies bastante mala para lo que podían haber echo.… Expand
  14. TheSPGames
    May 22, 2016
    10
    I just love it because the multiplayer is awesome,the zombies are fantastic the campaign is no the best history ever but is good.I know a lot of people want back to the second war but if it back to the second the people gonna say:We wanna a future call of duty
  15. Brochacho214
    May 25, 2016
    7
    As an avid Call Of Duty fan, I can say that this franchise is starting to sink exponentially. The last two installments were very big letdowns, and while this title is a definite improvement, it still falls short in certain categories.

    At its core, Call Of Duty has always been a casual shooter, as in something you can put in and immediately and know how to play. It's has an    As an avid Call Of Duty fan, I can say that this franchise is starting to sink exponentially. The last two installments were very big letdowns, and while this title is a definite improvement, it still falls short in certain categories.

    At its core, Call Of Duty has always been a casual shooter, as in something you can put in and immediately and know how to play. It's has an exponentially low skill ceiling (depending on your playstyle) and was always just a game you and your friends can have a good time in.

    The single player is pretty unique. Treyarch took a sort of tactical approach to the single player, adding in special abilities and new features. The added different kinds of enemies into the mix, such as robots and tank-like enemies called warlords, of which contributes to the level of tactic and thought you must put in before tackling a level or location. The levels are very action packed, as expected with every CoD.

    The multi-player in this game is a big improvement from Advanced Warfare, but still has a few kinks. They took out the dreaded "exo-abilities" from the mix and instead replaced it with a thrust pack that can improve movement, but doesn't let players fly around the entirety of the map. Combat is usually found on the ground, and can be really intense and engaging especially with the wallrun ability. Weapon balance has improved greatly and lets players pick from a plethora of weapons that are viable in mutli-player. Another addition is the Specialist option, which allows players to pick a character that has a set ability in the game.
    These abilities are viable and can be really useful, but can sometimes be fairly unbalanced.

    Zombies in this game is very well done. The only new addition to zombies is the GobbleGum perks, which are set abilities you can bring in and buy using points in the game. These are completely optional, however, and you don't really need to rely on them to go into high rounds.

    All around, the game isn't bad. I give this a 7 because it's very easy to lose interest in. Around the time i got to 4th prestige, i pretty much stopped playing as much as I used too. The matches themselves can get really repetitive and boring, and zombies just seems to drag on after about round 25.

    All in all, if you like CoD, I'd say buy. If your not a fan of CoD, see for yourself if you like it or not.    … Expand
  16. arostislavna
    Jun 19, 2020
    5
    I genuinely like the futuristic campaign, however it is NOT "Black Ops".

    Multiplayer is trash.
  17. GameReviewLB
    Jun 13, 2016
    8
    This game is a good change of the call of duty franchise, the team at trey-arch really spent a while into this game and it is very fun to play.
    Only real problem with this game is that the 'future' style is getting quite stale but this has really over powered the previous game advanced warfare, I would really suggest this game to anyone who likes first person shooters.
  18. RaulGM3
    Jun 26, 2016
    5
    Es un jugo repetitivo lo unico bueno es los zombis , la campaña con un amigo esta bien solo no y el multi es flipante entre la conexion , fallos y desbalanceos . Penoso
  19. warisvafa99
    Dec 2, 2016
    10
    Fantastic game. I never cared about cod campaign, but the multiplayer and zombies are excellent. Loved black ops 2 and love black ops 3 . This os not repetive and boring like advanced Warfare. Truly worth the money
  20. superxcereal
    Jun 29, 2016
    7
    Ive been a big COD fan for a while BO3 was like they tried a liiiiittttle too hard. it is fun especially with the specialist and customization's you can make. zombies is new and revamped looking great. campaign is okayish but fun. my only fault is that its so laggy and connection gets lost and hackers all while trying to squeeze money out of you to make your character look different... isIve been a big COD fan for a while BO3 was like they tried a liiiiittttle too hard. it is fun especially with the specialist and customization's you can make. zombies is new and revamped looking great. campaign is okayish but fun. my only fault is that its so laggy and connection gets lost and hackers all while trying to squeeze money out of you to make your character look different... is it really worth money to change clothes and skins of guns? stop being greedy if you cant even deliver lag free so i dont have to rage about no xp to get these stupid skins, maybe more people would pay if they had great online experiences.… Expand
  21. salmansohail_
    Jan 29, 2017
    8
    Call of Duty Black Ops 3 is the final installment in the black ops trilogy, but it has nothing to do with it. Infact this really does piss me off as it could have easily been called Advanced Warfare 2. IT had nothing to do with Black Ops. Only a a few words of raul Menendez was spoken and it overall the campaign was boring. However the multiplayer and zombies shine as one of the bestCall of Duty Black Ops 3 is the final installment in the black ops trilogy, but it has nothing to do with it. Infact this really does piss me off as it could have easily been called Advanced Warfare 2. IT had nothing to do with Black Ops. Only a a few words of raul Menendez was spoken and it overall the campaign was boring. However the multiplayer and zombies shine as one of the best experiences I have had throughout the years. The zombies is just a few bugs away from being the best zombies maps. Even If I did prefer the classic movement I think that the advanced movement was nailed down to the ground in this title. Its a great game but the campaign and black market really breaks it out.

    Campaign: 5/10
    -Interesting Story
    -Misleading Game Title
    -Nothing to do with Black Ops.
    -Dumb and Useless Characters
    -Short

    Multiplayer: 8/10
    -Advanced movement surprisingly good
    -Map layout is good
    -Black Market sucks
    -Specialists are unique and not game breaking

    Zombies: 9/10
    -Amazing completion to the zombies universe
    -Fun map flow and Easter eggs
    -A few bugs
    -Gobble gum system works great

    Overall: 8/10    … Expand
  22. JyroJyro
    Sep 19, 2017
    6
    This is the first Call of Duty game that I've purchased since Modern Warfare 3 back in 2011, and it's exactly what I expected and no more. A predictably boring campaign and a repetitively addictive online mode that feels largely unchanged since the original Black Ops in 2010. The jet pack & wall climbing movements are an interesting addition though, and the well designed maps integrate theThis is the first Call of Duty game that I've purchased since Modern Warfare 3 back in 2011, and it's exactly what I expected and no more. A predictably boring campaign and a repetitively addictive online mode that feels largely unchanged since the original Black Ops in 2010. The jet pack & wall climbing movements are an interesting addition though, and the well designed maps integrate the new movements excellently.… Expand
  23. dislexicpotato
    Oct 21, 2018
    7
    Black Ops 3 has a ton of new ideas and is better than its predecessor AW with its pretty graphics, smooth fun gameplay and a range of maps that are for the most part good. However its campaign is weak, league play is disappointing and the game overall just feels like a downgrade of Black Ops 2 and feels like a downgraded Titanfall.
  24. Franquixote
    Aug 16, 2016
    8
    Just finished the campaign today- as a middle-aged person with a family and demanding career, gaming is not exactly a priority. Haven't played much multiplayer so this is almost strictly from the point of view of the campaign mode on "recruit". It took about half the game to understand all the mechanics, not interested in finding every collectible or leveling up and don't want frustratingJust finished the campaign today- as a middle-aged person with a family and demanding career, gaming is not exactly a priority. Haven't played much multiplayer so this is almost strictly from the point of view of the campaign mode on "recruit". It took about half the game to understand all the mechanics, not interested in finding every collectible or leveling up and don't want frustrating grinds to find the exact "right" route through a map... the ammo boxes were a bit too plentiful and the boss-type robots were a bit too repetitive and basically just a matter of firing and hiding for 20 minutes until you wear them down. But the graphics and sound were fun and the game has at least a hint of A.I. philosophy behind it and was about the right difficulty to just casually play when I had a few hours to relax. The ending was pretty fun, especially the last 3 minutes when "White Rabbit" is playing in the background.
    I don't generally care for the futuristic stuff and there's minimal strategy here but it was a fun escape for 20 hours or so. $2-3 an hour isn't a bad deal to be entertained and that's not even including the multiplayer or the few times me and a friend have played zombies together. I imagine playing campaign with a friend would've been even more fun.
    Not too shabby, like most everyone else I'm tired of all the futuristic stuff and hope they go back to WW2 or Vietnam or a current-day Middle Eastern theme but I don't regret buying or playing it.    … Expand
  25. arandoski200
    Aug 31, 2016
    3
    Black Ops 3 is a game with a terrible single player. Medicore zombie mode, i dont even know what to do, what are rituals again? A decent multiplayer however the experience is ruined by lag. Yh a 4 is what this game deserves.
  26. vcts1993
    Aug 31, 2016
    4
    At all it's an disappointing game, and it's really frustating that the game changes almost nothing comparing to its predecessors. The Multiplayer is kinda fun, but it's almost the same thing that we've seen before, Adding to this we have a pretty boring campaign with a lot of non-sense tecnologies that advanced WAY TOO MUCH in 40 years (based on fact that in BO2 we was on 2025) and a notAt all it's an disappointing game, and it's really frustating that the game changes almost nothing comparing to its predecessors. The Multiplayer is kinda fun, but it's almost the same thing that we've seen before, Adding to this we have a pretty boring campaign with a lot of non-sense tecnologies that advanced WAY TOO MUCH in 40 years (based on fact that in BO2 we was on 2025) and a not so good characters, that really do not captivate anybody and are just "whatever" people with... Good point of this game is, the variations of weapons, and the possible combinatios with the multiplayer's perks and kill streaks lists, adding a really good graphics and not-so-good sound effects... By the way the dialogues of the game are really depressing and boring… Expand
  27. therandomuser
    Sep 11, 2016
    3
    **** just **** call of duty black ops 3 isn't worth £40 no its worth £5. i hate all this wall running (from titanfall) or the special abilities (basically the supers from destiny) and the campaign makes no sense its was so stupid. the only reason this game is a 3/10 is because zombies, treyarch should just make a call of duty zombie game, but then i guess call of duty cant get people to**** just **** call of duty black ops 3 isn't worth £40 no its worth £5. i hate all this wall running (from titanfall) or the special abilities (basically the supers from destiny) and the campaign makes no sense its was so stupid. the only reason this game is a 3/10 is because zombies, treyarch should just make a call of duty zombie game, but then i guess call of duty cant get people to buy their dlc or season pass. in the end call of duty should follow assassins creed and take a break if you want to buy a good shooter halo 5, titanfall, destiny or battlefield 4 is where you should put your money… Expand
  28. KingAndCountry
    Sep 12, 2016
    5
    Most reviews here aren't judging this game on its merits or flaws, but rather because of the series it's in.

    Which is unfortunate, because Black Ops III deserves criticism, but not just because it's another Call of Duty game. I'll admit it's a factor, but that doesn't earn the game an immediate 0. Let's start with the negatives, that have been ignored in favor of the aforementioned or    Most reviews here aren't judging this game on its merits or flaws, but rather because of the series it's in.

    Which is unfortunate, because Black Ops III deserves criticism, but not just because it's another Call of Duty game. I'll admit it's a factor, but that doesn't earn the game an immediate 0. Let's start with the negatives, that have been ignored in favor of the aforementioned or otherwise blindly glossed over.

    This game has the worst multiplayer servers in the series, to the point that it's nearly unplayable. It's not unusual to be disconnected five times in a row. Host migrations almost always fail. Lobbies full of players but never start a match. Random and frequent lag spikes to 400 ping regardless of your connection speed. I once played ten minutes in game for what should have amounted to an hour. -2 for playability.

    The single-player campaign is also easily the worst in the series. It's obvious that they just included it because they had to. Nonsensical plot, meaningless enemies, nonexistant effort put into this at all. If you've ever tried to get into it, I pity you. -2 for including this half-ass throwaway of a campaign.

    Now for the positives. This is the best Zombies experience there is, on par with and built over the original experience in World at War. Diverse maps, great gameplay, complex mechanics that actually require some forethought, and an interesting wrap up to the background storyline to boot. +2 for impressing me on this part of the game, and -1 for deliberately putting the best parts of BO3 in $60 DLC.

    The multiplayer gameplay itself is surprisingly good too, but the unreliability of the servers effectively cancel this out. The specialists and movement system keep things varied enough, and the new game modes like Safeguard are more than welcome. Relatively balanced gunplay. All in all it's still fun with a friend, and that's also the only reason I play it, if only to pass the time waiting to find a real match.

    And yes, -2 for being another COD game. Starting at an 8/10 is more than fair. We all know the series has been milked, but compared to the immediate previous games in this series, BO3 is definitely a standout title. I'd even say that I'd rather play this than MW3 or BO2, and I'd rank BO3 above either of them.    … Expand
  29. saundaun
    Sep 19, 2016
    2
    This game has good graphics and has cool costumes. Playing multiplayer is horrible, i will legit shoot people 8 times on hardcore and get the hit markers and die in 1 shot. I also shoot people at least three times b4 i die. but yet I die. The aim assist is god awful, i miss everytime i use it so i turned it off.Ii hav'nt played a full game of zombies in 3 months because it lags outThis game has good graphics and has cool costumes. Playing multiplayer is horrible, i will legit shoot people 8 times on hardcore and get the hit markers and die in 1 shot. I also shoot people at least three times b4 i die. but yet I die. The aim assist is god awful, i miss everytime i use it so i turned it off.Ii hav'nt played a full game of zombies in 3 months because it lags out everytime. but if i play online by my self it works great. They insist on coming out with maps just for campers to, wich bothers the **** out of me.… Expand
  30. 35tozovo
    Jan 2, 2017
    4
    Купил консоль вместе с этой игрой. Могу сказать одно - это самая скучная игра, в которую я играл за всю мою сознательную жизнь! Начала игры - ТИР, середина игры - ТИР, и блять даже концовка ебаный ТИР!! Сука пожалуйста не надо нам калл оф дюти, пожалуйста! 3.578/10Купил консоль вместе с этой игрой. Могу сказать одно - это самая скучная игра, в которую я играл за всю мою сознательную жизнь! Начала игры - ТИР, середина игры - ТИР, и блять даже концовка ебаный ТИР!! Сука пожалуйста не надо нам калл оф дюти, пожалуйста! 3.578/10
Page:

Awards & Rankings

51
#51 Best PS4 Game of 2015
8
#8 Most Discussed PS4 Game of 2015
6
#6 Most Shared PS4 Game of 2015

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
81

Generally favorable reviews - based on 87 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 73 out of 87
  2. Mixed: 14 out of 87
  3. Negative: 0 out of 87
  1. GameGrin
    Feb 4, 2016
    75
    Underneath the glamour, it feels like just another Call of Duty game - to the delight of existing fans, but the chagrin of players seeking new turf.
    Read full review
  2. CD-Action
    Jan 12, 2016
    75
    Both the single player and online modes are fun but don’t expect to be blown away. Despite a great story and a couple of very enjoyable missions the campaign as a whole is a tad boring. [13/2015, p.50]
  3. Pelit (Finland)
    Jan 4, 2016
    91
    What we have here is the best Call of Duty single player experience to date. The multiplayer is solid too, though the much-talked re-design has resulted a multiplayer experience that really doesn’t differ all that much from the previous ones. [Nov 2015]
See all critic reviews »