Battlefield V

 PlayStation 4
User Score
2.7

Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 3123 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 538 out of 3123
  2. Mixed: 363 out of 3123
  3. Negative: 2,222 out of 3123
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. LuciusCarluswig
    Nov 19, 2018
    8
    Sans être parfais Battlefield V et un bon jeu et son model Economique est respectable par les temps qui cours.
    on peut ne pas aimer mais on ne peut pas dire que le jeu est mauvais.
    Ce n'est pas un jeu de niche, de simulation de guerre etc... c'est un jeux avant tout fun a jouer mais qui s'inscrite bien dans cette époque sombre de notre histoire
  2. Baddog163
    Nov 19, 2018
    9
    voy a pasar de comentar la campaña porque concuerdo con la mayoría que no le parece buena y que es muy decepcionante ya que me esperaba mas por lo buena pero corta también que fue la campaña de bf1. De lo que realmente quiero hablar es del multijugador que me parece uno de los mejores de la saga. Creo que te ofrece muchas horas de juego nada mas que con el contenido de lanzamiento y quevoy a pasar de comentar la campaña porque concuerdo con la mayoría que no le parece buena y que es muy decepcionante ya que me esperaba mas por lo buena pero corta también que fue la campaña de bf1. De lo que realmente quiero hablar es del multijugador que me parece uno de los mejores de la saga. Creo que te ofrece muchas horas de juego nada mas que con el contenido de lanzamiento y que dará mas con las expansiones(que son gratis). No entiendo porque la gente dice que es una reskin de bf1, que si puede ser en algunos interiores de casas pero me parece muy ridiculo y que tambien se quejan de que las armas de bf1 estan en el juego, que si es una buen punto pero por lo menos cambiaron las animaciones de recarga. Faltan las animaciones nuevas de ataques cuerpo a cuerpo y la de arrastrar a los heridos, que esta ultima no la veo tan necesaria. En cuanto a bugs si que hay pero ninguno que me haya arruinado la experiencia, pero si que seria bueno que los arreglasen. Algo que no entiendo son las rewiews de la gente, que dicen cosas que son ciertos, pero cuando le dan la nota le ponen 0 y los que le dan algo de nota lo justifican que lo unico bueno que tiene son los graficos y los sonidos porque ahi no pueden decir nada. Me parece que es gente que ni jugo al juego. Tambien es cierto que faltan facciones importate(USA, Japon, Rusia,etc), pero los añadiran en el futuro y si nadie quiere esperar, pero tampoco es para destruir al juego por eso y ademas a mi me parece divertido igual si ellos(eso no quieta el echo de que me muero por ganas de que salgan). Los trajes de los soldados se pueden personalizar para que el color se adapte al del mapa, para que no sea tan falso, ya que hay gente que se quejaba de esto tambien. Sinceramente me parece un muy buen battlefield y que cualquiera que haya disfrutado con los anteriores juegos va amar este. Y los que le pones 0 insisto que seguro no lo han jugado todavía. Con el tiempo este battlefield ira mejorando con mas contenido gratis que nadie quiere esperar pero bueno hay mucho contenido de momento y cada mes van añadiendo mas. Yo les recomendaría esperar hasta las rebajas de navidad, pero si lo compran ahora tampoco veo que sea un desperdicio de dinero.… Expand
  3. maxm45678
    Nov 16, 2018
    0
    Comfortable and realistic gameplay and good mechanics but the setting is too far from WW2.
  4. Writerjoe
    Nov 17, 2018
    10
    Game of the year. What a bunch of i..... low rating here!! xD Maybe hired from Treyarch, their Call of duty not very good this time.hahaha Or from Sony coz they hate that dice told people that its played the best on x box one x - which i have. Totally best game graphic and super detailed, i play on x box one x, which i have seen, best sound, best gun feeling ever, best multiplayermaps 8Game of the year. What a bunch of i..... low rating here!! xD Maybe hired from Treyarch, their Call of duty not very good this time.hahaha Or from Sony coz they hate that dice told people that its played the best on x box one x - which i have. Totally best game graphic and super detailed, i play on x box one x, which i have seen, best sound, best gun feeling ever, best multiplayermaps 8 pieces of them, all the usuual gamemodes, very good singleplayer campains, new ways of moving, f instance lying on the back withdrawing and shooting, u can choose if waiting for calling a medic short or bleed out immediately, all classes can heal and build fortifies. U should try lying in the grass sneking agains a bride with bullits whistling around ur ears and a spitfire flying low, right above you - and then you get that with a hand granate :) game filled of these moments. Game and battlefield history written in my opinion. game filled with content!! hese srumours about no content from people that got confused over such a complicated game i guess. I did not even mention upgrading of persons and guns and weapon skins. Sooooo amazingly good - also compared to earlier BF games, which means a lot:) There are about 7-8 weapons in every class, detailed to the best weapon copies from that period plus very detailed trucks, cars vehicles. And NO bugs at all I could carry on - and NO i am not paid from Dice or EA. Just a gamer who love an amazing game - not filled with hate or jealousy like others here hahaha… Expand
  5. GiZMaX
    Nov 22, 2018
    9
    It's a great Battlefield game and my squad love it. There is no other war game with that feeling of real battlefield. So guys, hope seeing you soon on field! And btw Soviets will be added in free DLC, so there is no reason for zeroes.
  6. naikon2007
    Nov 19, 2018
    10
    геймплейно и графически самая лучшая и продуманная из всех частей. Никаких багов за несколько первых часов в мультиплеере не обнаружено, за исключением того, что периодически слетают настройки бойца
  7. Terminal-Rex
    Mar 24, 2021
    0
    Ive been playing battlefield games since BF 1942 and i have to say this is by far the worst game in the franchise.

    Never have they released a game which is so wholly unbalanced, it feels like they have basically tried to cater for people that prefer the COD style of fast action paint-n-spray game-play but completely forgotten about all the other game styles out there. Maps are    Ive been playing battlefield games since BF 1942 and i have to say this is by far the worst game in the franchise.

    Never have they released a game which is so wholly unbalanced, it feels like they have basically tried to cater for people that prefer the COD style of fast action paint-n-spray game-play but completely forgotten about all the other game styles out there.

    Maps are forgettable, weapons unbalanced and worst of all the current community on this game is rancid.

    I have been a loyal follower and fan of the Battlefield franchise and with this game RIP BATTLEFIELD - now just another badly designed COD rip off .    … Expand
  8. Beast979
    Dec 9, 2018
    6
    So first off, the multiplayer is decent as it should be...graphics are good, gunplay feels tight....but it kind of just feels like a re-skin of BF1. It's fun but nothing new to see here.

    The single player....well at least it is included I may be one of the few that plays SP, but I won't buy a game that does not have a campaign. the couple stories there are are decent, but nothing    So first off, the multiplayer is decent as it should be...graphics are good, gunplay feels tight....but it kind of just feels like a re-skin of BF1. It's fun but nothing new to see here.

    The single player....well at least it is included I may be one of the few that plays SP, but I won't buy a game that does not have a campaign. the couple stories there are are decent, but nothing special...it pretty much feels like they just threw it in there to have a campaign attached. I thought the BF1 campaign was decent but short, this is even shorter.

    All in all, not sure it was worth the full price of the game. decently fun for a while, but passable if you don't feel like spending the money on it.    … Expand
  9. Taggen86
    Nov 22, 2021
    9
    While the game is somewhat unbalanced, it is incredible fun. Have not enjoyed a multiplayer game this much in years
  10. MastroCicuta
    May 30, 2021
    5
    Been a fan of the series since the glorious Bad Company 2, I can tell you this is one of the WORST Battlefield to date.
    Tried it with the Xbox Pass (may2021), and thanks God, because I would have regret buying it.
    Technically speaking is beautiful. Nothing to argue there. Maybe a little bit too many lighting effects can bother you when aiming down sight but other than this, it's visually    Been a fan of the series since the glorious Bad Company 2, I can tell you this is one of the WORST Battlefield to date.
    Tried it with the Xbox Pass (may2021), and thanks God, because I would have regret buying it.
    Technically speaking is beautiful. Nothing to argue there. Maybe a little bit too many lighting effects can bother you when aiming down sight but other than this, it's visually and functionally a masterpiece.
    The problem is about the gameplay. To date, basically all game modes are dead but deathmatch, conquest and breakthrough, very little else. It is sad because the game has many interesting modes but apparently it doesn't incentive players playing them.
    Balance issues with vehicles in particular aircrafts in general: it's very simple they are too powerful and ruin the game. I really hope they will eventually decide to completely remove them from future installments of the franchise, helicopters are more counterable but they must be kept in check to avoid the same stuff happening in BFBC2 or 3. They simply sink out the fun from the vast majority of the players in favour of very few skilled pilots, which with the tools at our disposal too often seem to be impossible to take down. I think that the game should be enjoyed by everybody not just a small portion of the player base.
    TTK is actually fine, it is in my opinion a good balance between reaction time and aiming even tho the weapon become less effective very quickly at longer distances. The problem with the weapons is that classes are very "rigid", set in stone, with very little customization, there are more flexible ones (assault) and more limited/straightforward (recon, medic). You have for the most part stick with the weapon of your class and there are no "free for all classes" weapons like it used to in the previous title. Weapon themselves are very little customizable, with a lot more effort being put in the cosmetic side of things rather than the practical one. The result is that progressing through the weapons unlock is not really rewarding,you unlock perks rather than actual weapon parts, so there is no actual way to say for example, set a custom stock, longer or shorter barrel, somewhat of a silencer (it's hard I know it's ww2 after all)... nothing like that. Dull, and boring.
    Ultimately because of the sheer amount of explosions, vehicles and number of players the game is really too chaotic at times, and even if it manages to draw a very nice portrait of what fighting during ww2 was like, game wise it becomes too easy to die from random stuff happening at the same time.
    64 players at the same time maybe a lot of fun at first but probably 32 or 48 is better if you want to have a minimum of a tactical approach. You can theoretically search for 32 game lobbies but there are basically none which is again, kind of a shame.
    I think that the franchise should focus more into making more "guerrilla warfare" games rather than world war scale, in order to reduce the amount of randomness happening into the game. A new Battlefield is very close to the announce, let's hope for the best.    … Expand
  11. uazzz007
    Nov 10, 2020
    3
    This is the worst battlefield ever. Some classes like support are just nerfed to the ground, new **** mechanics, snipers are OP. The color palette is so **** bright that sometimes it is hard to see an enemy. Soldiers uniforms are confusing sometimes because of skins (and thats not only my problem. i saw many times my teammates tried to shoot me). TTK is hight. Snipers - op as **** lots ofThis is the worst battlefield ever. Some classes like support are just nerfed to the ground, new **** mechanics, snipers are OP. The color palette is so **** bright that sometimes it is hard to see an enemy. Soldiers uniforms are confusing sometimes because of skins (and thats not only my problem. i saw many times my teammates tried to shoot me). TTK is hight. Snipers - op as **** lots of maps where it is hard to hide. Is modern level design is just a flat surface and a bunch of rocks? A lot of open spaces where you are just like shooting dummy. Global operations don't have narrative logic coz no matter if you win or lose - you still gonna start "A new day" on the next location what is just baloney and doesn't make any sense. Submachine gun are no more a weapon - just garbage. Bipod mechanics doesn't work properly and cause you pain in the ass. New health system - **** that makes you play safer and force new players to camp. There is no such thing in this game that works just right. If the next game will be that bad - the series is dead.
    PS. Just a tip. Fire your game designer - He doesn't know his game and why do people play Battlefied...    … Expand
  12. Voxman
    Jan 23, 2019
    6
    The game is incredibly boring and controversial.
    The problem is both in the game itself and in the completely bestial attitude of developers and publishers to the players (which became known due to several leaks in reddit and official tweets).
    1) HUD blocks visibility. Due to player marks or points, the enemy may not be visible. 2) Contrast "eats away" eyes on some maps. In the    The game is incredibly boring and controversial.
    The problem is both in the game itself and in the completely bestial attitude of developers and publishers to the players (which became known due to several leaks in reddit and official tweets).
    1) HUD blocks visibility. Due to player marks or points, the enemy may not be visible.
    2) Contrast "eats away" eyes on some maps. In the buildings it is impossible to discern opponents. Light and dark swings are too strong.
    3) At the same time, the enemies are not marked in a normal way, and the scouts do not use signal flares!
    4) There are no enemies on the global map and you will easily be shot in the back by joining a squad after death.
    Bottom line: hardcore detection mechanics (which does not work due to the fact that teamwork does not work fully) complicates the visual component and the poor HUD.
    At the same time they kill you too quickly. Shooting here is good, but it's almost the only thing that works great in this game.
    Therefore, a significant part of the game has to wait - which kills the dynamics. Either you are sitting in the dark corner of the room, or get shot in the back and wait for the medic.
    Very cool and dynamic. Who, under such conditions, will desperately attack points? This mechanic does not create tension, it creates boredom.

    In CoD BO4, enemies can also quickly kill you (not in the royal battle, where the TTC is higher, but in the usual multiplayer game).
    But you sleep fast. Yes, and you can be treated freely. HERE, you are deprived of a full recovery of health points, you often will not have a first-aid kit and cartridges. How does this affect the dynamics? Streyfitsya here also fails to fully, because you constantly come across a stone or other obstacle.

    This is not all - there are still many bugs here. My customization character of the support character is already flying for the fifth time. And the front line mode is currently broken.

    But the worst thing that has been done is a spoiled Operation mode, which in BF1 was very good. There is no global map, which gave everything visibility, scale and integrity. The games themselves are tight and can’t shut up prematurely.

    In BF1 it was possible to win on the first day, there was progress and a connection between the days of the operation. Here this bond has weakened. And there are no Giants.
    Oh, this game has become a big disappointment for me. There are still many negative points that can be mentioned, but I got tired of writing it.

    From the positive, of course, the already mentioned shooting, visually the game looks good (although there are problems with contrast and HUD), the mechanics with crushing grass and the construction of barricades are good. The technique is implemented, as for me, normal. The limit on the number of projectiles for technology is fully justified. The mechanics of a squad leader also makes the game better.

    The game could turn out good if it was developed longer and if it was developed by people who understand games.    … Expand
  13. Einheit
    Sep 27, 2020
    0
    Developers should have learned history first and only then make the game. Don’t buy it. Don’t sponsor amateurs.
  14. geo3rdrow
    Nov 23, 2018
    8
    As a hardcore conservative, it really pisses me off about all the stuff SJW's ruined. but hey, i'm happy people are actually seeing this and saying something. However, as a game, I think it's exactly what you would expect from a Battlefield game. Very fun, large scale warfare. Definitely deserves better than what the haters are giving it.
  15. bazzbro
    May 17, 2021
    8
    Terrible Campaigns
    Ok Multiplayer
    Buggy
    Visual downgrade

    enjoyed for the most part.
  16. SuperkenGaming
    May 10, 2021
    8
    Battlefield 5
    a great attention to detail
    I was hooked on battlefield 1 5 years ago, so I of course had to check out battlefield 5 and watch them hopefully execute further on their war stories single player campaign.. this time around I didn’t care much for the multiplayer… I don’t know if recent advancements have just made me less patient in the multiplayer world, but here in    Battlefield 5
    a great attention to detail
    I was hooked on battlefield 1 5 years ago, so I of course had to check out battlefield 5 and watch them hopefully execute further on their war stories single player campaign..
    this time around I didn’t care much for the multiplayer… I don’t know if recent advancements have just made me less patient in the multiplayer world, but here in batt;efield 5 it feels like spawn die spawn die.. worse than recent call of dudtys.. but the time it takes to actually get back in the game makes battlefield 5 multiplayer from firestorm, to the modes youre used to just frustrating to play through for me… so I pushed that to the side and just focused on its 5 and a half hour long campaign..
    And thankfully the campaign here is beautiful.. so much attention to detail here… and a nice varity when it comes to the levels as you go across 5 different war stories… all with different languages.. so sadly if youre like me and hate subtitles.. you don’t relaly have a choice here if you want to know whats going on… I love that battlefield 5 at least tried to deliver a unique experience in each of the 5 stories.. but not nearly as much as battlefield 1… all 5 stories stuck out here.. but mostly for its setting aside for a snow level whee you get to travers with skiis, really having me wishing for a first person ssx game… but in terms of level design overall, all 5 chapters felt pretty identical, same objective, different location.. g oacross this open map, make stuff explode, rinse repeat with some cutscenes in between… I feel like dice needs to really take note from the call of duty team with their recent emphasis on variety throughout their campaigns… at times battlefield 5 does feel like its delivering mini first person shooter games inside one world… but most of the time, it all feels too familiar, having you wanting it to just be over alredy, rather thaan feeling like wow, what an amazing 5 stories like they did last time..
    Overall im kind of over battlefield multiplayer, but as far as its singplayer goes, I really hope dice hone in on this, and delivers us more fleshed out mini stories, that don’t feel so copy and paste when it comes to objectives and delivery. I feel like this could help with the constant immersion breaking return to combat area countdown . its fine every once in a while, but constantly being told to get back in a quote unquote open world setting, just shows a lack of care when it comes to designing your experience.. it feels like a bandaid forcing you to be in the spot the game wants you to be in, rather design doing its job of keeping you there.
    I havnt given up on this series yet, and at least for its war stories, Ill have a reason to keep coming back.
    I give Battlefield 5
    a 7.5/10    … Expand
  17. Pastafarian
    Nov 20, 2018
    6
    Its a good shooter and im having a lot of fun. The maps are really good and look amaizng. Just seeing the lines of men charging the next objective is awesom.
    However the woman are really annoying and don't fit the setting.
    Woman should not be in any army and definitly not in a WW2 game. The campaign is really disappointing. And im missing the russian. It seems like dice have no clue    Its a good shooter and im having a lot of fun. The maps are really good and look amaizng. Just seeing the lines of men charging the next objective is awesom.
    However the woman are really annoying and don't fit the setting.
    Woman should not be in any army and definitly not in a WW2 game. The campaign is really disappointing. And im missing the russian. It seems like dice have no clue about history and ww2.    … Expand
  18. Manjisan13
    Dec 17, 2018
    7
    Overall a decent first person multiplayer game. History wise and content on day 1...well, they made a mess.==> not many maps, modes are so-so, where are the russian and japanese island maps?
    NOT my Top 3 battlefield game.
    .....Still waiting for Bad company 3 :) Oh forgot to mention some campaign story lines are still locked. bummer I really wanted to play The last Tiger. Tirailleur    Overall a decent first person multiplayer game. History wise and content on day 1...well, they made a mess.==> not many maps, modes are so-so, where are the russian and japanese island maps?
    NOT my Top 3 battlefield game.

    .....Still waiting for Bad company 3 :)
    Oh forgot to mention some campaign story lines are still locked. bummer I really wanted to play The last Tiger. Tirailleur was pretty decent.

    edit 17/12/2018 :
    Even after the few updates and contents ... There isn't enough content to play it till the Battle royal comes out for BFV. It's better that you buy it at a discounted price or at least till the new maps and modes comes out.

    The reason why I don"t give it a low rating is because there are worse games out there. And i know why the fanboys are getting upset for the BF franchise.
    EA and DICE gambled and LOST but it does't mean it is a BAD game.    … Expand
  19. DragonArmy12
    Feb 8, 2019
    6
    Could it have been done better? Yes. There could have been more factions and content at the start, but I believe the fan base would've been salty either way. The graphic and engine improvements are spectactular and combat is stellar (with a few minor issues). The game scratches two itches: playing a world war 2 game and playing in a squad. It's worth $30 now, and battle royale comes out inCould it have been done better? Yes. There could have been more factions and content at the start, but I believe the fan base would've been salty either way. The graphic and engine improvements are spectactular and combat is stellar (with a few minor issues). The game scratches two itches: playing a world war 2 game and playing in a squad. It's worth $30 now, and battle royale comes out in 30 days. Definitely worth a pick up if you have 2-3 friends to squad with.… Expand
  20. Birdie
    Aug 1, 2022
    0
    Go woke - get broke. This is of course a Swedish company and you know swedes - they are regarded and woke. Look at what they’ve done to their country. And why? Wokeness. SJW. Identify politics. Leftist feminism. And now this clown company Dice want to force this nonsense down your throat. I hope you go bankrupt Dice, seriously just piss the F off!
  21. altruist921
    Nov 10, 2019
    1
    Too boring and wacky story such as wacky and boring gameplay. Also has annoying minor bugs.
  22. SuperDuck23
    May 22, 2021
    5
    Exactly what you’d expect from this type of game and nothing more. Uninspired and yawn-inducing.
  23. Empyrea
    Apr 3, 2021
    7
    I have played the opening and the three missions and it's ok but nothing relevant. The story of the game would deserve a 7 or an 8. I can't speak about the online game. I haven't played the mission called The last tiger because I have limited internet and the update were like 65 gb. Without the update I found some issues but they were not a big deal. I played the mission of Norway inI have played the opening and the three missions and it's ok but nothing relevant. The story of the game would deserve a 7 or an 8. I can't speak about the online game. I haven't played the mission called The last tiger because I have limited internet and the update were like 65 gb. Without the update I found some issues but they were not a big deal. I played the mission of Norway in normal difficulty and the rest in easy because I was tired of dying a lot. And yes it's short, about 6 hours or so (depending on how good or bad you are). To sum up, good game but nothing special.… Expand
  24. Lewis-Angelo
    Mar 1, 2021
    4
    lo mejor es, sin duda, la banda sonora

    la jugabilidad ha empeorado, va fatal apuntar, usar armas apostadas, o cualquier cosa que tenga que ver con la interacción con el escenario ¿los rifles en la segunda guerra mundial no tenían caída de bala?, ¿los muros eran de adamantium? es triste ver los pasos atrás de una saga que aportaba muchísimo más en 2008 que ahora en la campaña ponen    lo mejor es, sin duda, la banda sonora

    la jugabilidad ha empeorado, va fatal apuntar, usar armas apostadas, o cualquier cosa que tenga que ver con la interacción con el escenario
    ¿los rifles en la segunda guerra mundial no tenían caída de bala?, ¿los muros eran de adamantium?
    es triste ver los pasos atrás de una saga que aportaba muchísimo más en 2008 que ahora

    en la campaña ponen mapas enormes que piden a gritos cooperativo, con una IA retrasada que no falla ni una bala

    está muy bien que quieran contar historias no tan trilladas, pero hacer un juego de WWII y que no aparezcan ni rusos ni americanos...
    un par de ingleses en Egipto, una chica en Noruega, y unos senegaleses en Francia (la mejor), pues no es forma de hacer un juego de la WWII

    El último Tiger está ahí escondida, muy corta, sin trofeos siquiera...

    ya les pasó en Battefield 1 que se pasaron de listos olvidándose de los frentes más importantes
    pero es que en BFV no hay ni nazis

    para próximas entregas tienen que trabajar muchísimo en el motor gráfico y en la jugabilidad
    un estudio en muy baja forma desde BF3    … Expand
  25. Quickmiratius
    Nov 24, 2018
    7
    Плюсы: Наконец-то играбельный командный геймплей, наконец-то адекватная механика стрельбы, хорошие релизные карты, большие возможности в кастомизации с большим потенциалом их расширения, развитие контента без его докупок в будущем.
    Минусы: Баги, малое количество контента на старте при цене полной игры. Покупка игры за такие деньги для того, чтобы быть ней бета-тестером, не самый лучший    Плюсы: Наконец-то играбельный командный геймплей, наконец-то адекватная механика стрельбы, хорошие релизные карты, большие возможности в кастомизации с большим потенциалом их расширения, развитие контента без его докупок в будущем.
    Минусы: Баги, малое количество контента на старте при цене полной игры. Покупка игры за такие деньги для того, чтобы быть ней бета-тестером, не самый лучший подход со стороны ЕА.    … Expand
  26. Mistwalker_94
    Jan 8, 2019
    7
    I can tell be reading the negative reveiws that alot of them are writen by people who haven't played the game because they accuse the game of things that aren't true, example someone complained about black nazis, there aren't black nazis in the game. Some people straight up say that they haven't played the game but they are still here giving it negative reviews.
    The game isn't perfect far    I can tell be reading the negative reveiws that alot of them are writen by people who haven't played the game because they accuse the game of things that aren't true, example someone complained about black nazis, there aren't black nazis in the game. Some people straight up say that they haven't played the game but they are still here giving it negative reviews.
    The game isn't perfect far from it! In many ways it feels like it is still in beta but it is not the steaming piece of **** these people make it out to be.    … Expand
  27. Berrlett
    Mar 29, 2019
    6
    EA might have screwed up this one but for someone like me who is primarily into off-line single player campaign well at they considered that mode for this game and am going through it right now and I can't say I don't like what I have played. BUT because this game's main judgement is over the online multiplayer I'll just trust what I have read so far and put the score at no higher than 6.EA might have screwed up this one but for someone like me who is primarily into off-line single player campaign well at they considered that mode for this game and am going through it right now and I can't say I don't like what I have played. BUT because this game's main judgement is over the online multiplayer I'll just trust what I have read so far and put the score at no higher than 6. Got it for 65% off and liking the story so far.… Expand
  28. fernandoflores
    Feb 18, 2019
    10
    Não achei defeito nesse jogo, graficos no talo, mapas grandes e lindos, jogabildade perfeita, rodando a 60fps sem lags, jogo de adulto sem poderzinho ou slide ou frufru, só estranhei o fato de nao spotar, mas da pra acostumar. No aguardo do battle royale.
  29. Skibz
    Jan 21, 2019
    6
    Battlefield V is a solid game. It tries something new by introducing the attrition system whereby ammo is short supply and health doesn’t regenerate on it’s own. It takes a little bit of playing to get used to it and is an ok change. Squad play doesn’t really have any gameplay impact, just like other battlefield games being in a party helps with fallouts on enemy positions and revives inBattlefield V is a solid game. It tries something new by introducing the attrition system whereby ammo is short supply and health doesn’t regenerate on it’s own. It takes a little bit of playing to get used to it and is an ok change. Squad play doesn’t really have any gameplay impact, just like other battlefield games being in a party helps with fallouts on enemy positions and revives in my experience with the game.

    Now the elephant in the room, social justice politics in it, speaking for the multiplayer aspect (haven’t played the single player and don’t plan to) once you are in playing a match you are not bombarded with social justice messaging, you are just playing the game. With all the issues this game has people who it seems haven’t even played the game are focusing too much on the skin colour and gender of soldiers you can pick from. I understand that people are a little fed up with social justice agendas that are forced upon us in the entertainment industry, speak with your wallet don’t buy it, that is how you will effect change, but don’t add to the unnecessary hate this game has gotten by trying to limit someone else’s fun with it just because you don’t agree with the politics of the developers.    … Expand
  30. MarcinW
    Dec 4, 2018
    7
    The core game play and graphics, are the best in the series, but unfortunately everything else feels unfinished and rushed, multiplayer and single player. Overall this will probably be the game we expected in a year or so. Nonetheless what we have here does provide a lot of fun. Grab it on a sale.

    Also on PS4 i have not encountered the bugs that seem to be more prominent in PC version    The core game play and graphics, are the best in the series, but unfortunately everything else feels unfinished and rushed, multiplayer and single player. Overall this will probably be the game we expected in a year or so. Nonetheless what we have here does provide a lot of fun. Grab it on a sale.

    Also on PS4 i have not encountered the bugs that seem to be more prominent in PC version of the game. Also the player base is high enough to resolve the problems with empty servers.    … Expand
Page:

Awards & Rankings

7
#7 Most Discussed PS4 Game of 2018
39
#39 Most Shared PS4 Game of 2018

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
73

Mixed or average reviews - based on 23 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 15 out of 23
  2. Mixed: 8 out of 23
  3. Negative: 0 out of 23
  1. GameCritics
    Dec 27, 2018
    60
    In many ways, Battlefield V feels like a big step backwards for the franchise. The campaign is boring and frustrating, multiplayer is unbalanced, and bugs keep popping up in every mode to ruin the experience. The fortification system is a good shakeup, but the good it brings is tempered by the cumbersome and murky Grand Operations. With some patches, balance changes and bug squashing, BFV could be a fantastic game, but at the moment, this soldier needs to go back to basic training.
    Read full review
  2. Impulsegamer
    Dec 20, 2018
    76
    EA and DICE seem to have lost sight of what made this series a true contender for the FPS crown, and both the gameplay and the content are suffering as a result.
    Read full review
  3. Playstation Official Magazine UK
    Dec 12, 2018
    80
    Ripe with potential but riddled with problems, the new Battlefield will be brilliant six months from now. Right now, however, it’s merely a good shooter. [Issue#157, p.83]
See all critic reviews »