Battlefield V

 PlayStation 4
User Score
2.7

Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 3123 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 538 out of 3123
  2. Mixed: 363 out of 3123
  3. Negative: 2,222 out of 3123
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. Dottore
    Nov 16, 2018
    4
    This game is as bad as it gets. It's by far the buggiest, laggiest game I've ever played. If they ever want to get a bigger player database, they should focus on fixing the bugs, game breaking or not. Anyway, in this state, it is not worth full price.
  2. Kiwaso
    Nov 17, 2018
    4
    Is Battlefield 1.5
    I miss the great variety of weapons, vehicles and personalization that Battlefield 4 brought.
  3. RepkaKepka
    Aug 23, 2021
    4
    An interesting idea, not a bad implementation, but there is very little content, the developers no longer have enthusiasm. They forgot about the USSR at all ...
  4. SER06
    Nov 19, 2018
    4
    Вы прекрасно понимаете, почему я так оценил видеоигру.
  5. NWilson
    Nov 21, 2018
    4
    Despite the sensational polarization you see here between users giving this game a 0 and giving it a 10, it is neither. In its current state, assuming 5 is an average game, it is a 4.

    It's an unfinished game with a $60 price tag. The only difference is they don’t plan on charging us for the rest of the game this time like they did with Battlefield 1. I guess that’s why they couldn’t    Despite the sensational polarization you see here between users giving this game a 0 and giving it a 10, it is neither. In its current state, assuming 5 is an average game, it is a 4.

    It's an unfinished game with a $60 price tag. The only difference is they don’t plan on charging us for the rest of the game this time like they did with Battlefield 1. I guess that’s why they couldn’t bother finishing it.

    I bought the Deluxe edition and have been playing since the 15th. My PS4 dock has BFV, BF1, and BF4 on it. They’re all I play. With that in mind, I have to be honest in that even with the flashy new graphics, this game has nothing to offer that isn’t already more polished and enjoyable in BF1 or BF4, depending on your play style preferences. The only other interesting factor - the historical context - isn’t really even truly there. I’m not going to knock the game for taking creative liberties, but it very truly does not look like WWII much of the time.

    With that in mind, the gunplay is great. There are some important gameplay changes that I’m happy to see. Ammo is a factor to be concerned about again, both for infantry and vehicles. The building system makes for interesting situations that keep the battlefield dynamic and changing.

    But the game just isn’t there. The single player campaign is still an afterthought with little depth (and there is still an entire story of the campaign which they haven’t finished yet). The music isn’t even a shadow of what it was in BF1. There are fewer multiplayer maps on release than there were in BF1 or BF4. Grand Operations is fundamentally broken, and doesn’t provide the same excitement as BF1’s operations - whether you win or lose has no effect on the “outcome” of the battle in its historical context. There are no Russians, French, Americans, Japanese, or other factions besides the British and the Germans. For the so-called “staggered release” the developers planned, there are weapons from all years of the war present, even though it’s supposed to only take place in 1940 - see, e.g., the STG44 or the MG42.

    This game had a lot of bad press, and probably rightfully so. EA and Dice handled customer backlash in an extremely poor and unprofessional manner. The beta was a mess and worried a lot of people given its proximity to the original release date. There are a lot of triggered people because it has women in it or has customizable characters. I truly could not care less. It’s a video game. I understand that WWII is still a very emotional subject for a lot of people - we had 5 KIA in my own family. But it’s a video game. We had a KIA in the First World War as well, and BF1 wasn’t a pinnacle of historical accuracy either, by almost any measure. Maybe people just love history. There are still great, historically accurate WWII games out there. I’d suggest getting into PC gaming if that’s your thing. Here, though, I’m glad people are going to be able to feel comfortable looking like themselves in a game. But for all the fancy trendsetting...

    It just doesn’t work. It was poorly marketed, poorly planned, and poorly executed. It could be a very, very great game. It just isn’t in its current state, and there is a lot of work to be done.

    If you want this game, don’t buy it yet. Give it 3-6 months.    … Expand
  6. Wolfgang1978zmc
    Nov 21, 2018
    4
    Again we have not finish game looks like beta version, maybe 50@% why we need pay for extra content should be for free
  7. cswbizzel
    Feb 16, 2019
    4
    I have 5 days of play time in this game and I am running out of reasons to carry on playing. I have tried to like it, I really have. I can look past the SJW stuff if the game is functional and fun, but it just isn't. The game is a chore to play. It seems that every update brings with it more problems, more game breaking bugs and more things the community did not want nor ever asked for.I have 5 days of play time in this game and I am running out of reasons to carry on playing. I have tried to like it, I really have. I can look past the SJW stuff if the game is functional and fun, but it just isn't. The game is a chore to play. It seems that every update brings with it more problems, more game breaking bugs and more things the community did not want nor ever asked for. Since launch, the game has suffered problems in virtually all departments, especially the sound, movement, and in-game visibility. Despite updates to address all these problems, they still persist.

    The game's lack of commercial success coupled with the loss of revenue due to the lack of a premium pass is worrisome for the future of this game and the Battlefield series as a whole. I fear because of these two reasons there will be less incentive on EA/Dice's part to see this game through to its conclusion. It already feels as though they've started to give up on it just months after release by pushing out generic updates that rarely add anything noteworthy, and in some cases even take the game back two steps.

    The maps are some of the most unremarkable I recall in the Battlefield series and they start to feel stale very quickly as a consequence. The only ones that I like are Devastation, Rotterdam and Arras. The others fall between mediocre and outright appalling.

    I reached rank 50 and unlocked pretty much everything I wanted after just 24 hours of playtime. That is not what I consider a good progression system if I ever saw one. Why not add more ranks, more skins, more costumes instead of wasting development time and budget on game modes that nobody plays or cares about, Dice? Better still, add more maps, factions and make this game feel like a WWII game, because it feels nothing of the sort at present. You hardly ever listen to what the fans want, Dice, and that's your biggest problem. The community says they want one thing and you give them the polar opposite. They want the core game fixed, not crappy game modes like squad CQ. Papering over the cracks by adding game modes like this does nothing to address the glaring problems your game has. Fix the important stuff and add the less important stuff later.

    The one positive I can give this game is that I find its gunplay more solid in comparison to a predecessor like BF1, but that isn't enough to save it. It is just too flawed with too many bugs, too many people lying prone with MMGs. Nobody moves around in this game. It is the campiest Battlefield game I have ever played, and Dice is partly to blame for designing their game in a way that encourages camping.

    I have hardly scratched the surface of everything I could list that I don't like about this game, but I will leave it there. in conclusion, I can't recommend this game as it currently stands. I wish I could but I can't.    … Expand
  8. sebastianali
    Oct 23, 2019
    4
    Mientras que a mi me da igual las estupidas criticas hacia el feminismo, los DLC y que el contexto histórico esta mal, algo que nadie critico es la jugabilidad en si. A diferencia de otros juegos de la saga como el Battlefield Bad Company 2, no hay muchas recompensas mientras vas jugando, las armas estan muy desbalanceadas y no hay matchmaking. Bueno, en el Bad Company 2 no habia tampoco,Mientras que a mi me da igual las estupidas criticas hacia el feminismo, los DLC y que el contexto histórico esta mal, algo que nadie critico es la jugabilidad en si. A diferencia de otros juegos de la saga como el Battlefield Bad Company 2, no hay muchas recompensas mientras vas jugando, las armas estan muy desbalanceadas y no hay matchmaking. Bueno, en el Bad Company 2 no habia tampoco, pero por lo menos estaba tal equilibrado que incluso los novatos tenian oportunidad de jugar. En el online te matan a cada rato. El online, ademas de ser frustrante, haces misiones y misiones y misiones y no ganas nada... solo ganas recolores para las armas y tampoco podes agarrar armas que no tengas desbloqueadas de los enemigos... que cagada monumental. Y por ultimo, al igual que los otros Battlefield, la campaña es aburrida y sin chiste. Por lo menos graficamente esta bastante bien... Pero noto algunos glitches graficos en la lejania. En resumen: Este juego no se merece ni de loco un 0 pero tampoco un 8..... un 4 esta mejor...… Expand
  9. T-Dog
    Feb 23, 2019
    4
    Not really sure what the big critics are seeing here, all i see is a game that asks £50 ($60) for content that is yet to exist, while the game play itself is fairly solid at the same time its nothing special. There simply is not enough here at launch (or even today months later) to justify the price tag. game modes are missing, the weapon choice is poor at best, which is surprising givenNot really sure what the big critics are seeing here, all i see is a game that asks £50 ($60) for content that is yet to exist, while the game play itself is fairly solid at the same time its nothing special. There simply is not enough here at launch (or even today months later) to justify the price tag. game modes are missing, the weapon choice is poor at best, which is surprising given the amount of unique experimental weapons that were in service at the time in which battlefield V is set. If you want a battlefield game to play you are best going back to a previous entry which will be more or less the same experience but complete and cheaper.

    The single player story sections are ok, if you have played battlefield 1's story then it is basically that but worse and much more forgettable. I wont go into more detail to avoid spoilers.

    4/10- if you are wanting a new battlefield to scratch that itch, buy an old one.    … Expand
  10. Thumbuel
    Feb 28, 2019
    4
    The game completely ignores the USSR, Japan, China, the US, Italy, and more. The campaign mission "Nordlys" is historically inaccurate and disrespects the actual commandos who carried out the real mission. The game has no mention of the holocaust whatsoever and doesn't even have the guts to include a single swastika or even call the Germans "Nazis." The maps get stale pretty fast andThe game completely ignores the USSR, Japan, China, the US, Italy, and more. The campaign mission "Nordlys" is historically inaccurate and disrespects the actual commandos who carried out the real mission. The game has no mention of the holocaust whatsoever and doesn't even have the guts to include a single swastika or even call the Germans "Nazis." The maps get stale pretty fast and there's a big problem with the map shuffle. The gameplay is fun and immersive, but that immersion is lost pretty quickly after you get killed by a black female Nazi. A pretty disappointing game overall and definitely not worth your money.… Expand
  11. CaptainMarioPop
    Mar 11, 2019
    4
    I tried to enjoy the game, and to a degree, I do. But it has way too many problems for me to continuously enjoy it. The campaign is extremely boring story wise and way to much stealth used. It feels way to rushed and empty. I never really felt like I was in the middle of a war.

    The multiplayer is ok, but extremely frustrating. Next to no weapon choice and a large amount of them are    I tried to enjoy the game, and to a degree, I do. But it has way too many problems for me to continuously enjoy it. The campaign is extremely boring story wise and way to much stealth used. It feels way to rushed and empty. I never really felt like I was in the middle of a war.

    The multiplayer is ok, but extremely frustrating. Next to no weapon choice and a large amount of them are overpowered like the STG-44 being the dominate weapon. Weapon upgrades have little to no repercussions, causing way too many op builds.Medic is weak with and the smg force medic to be in more risk to revive because of how weak they are.

    The "live service" is very slow and when they do happen, weapons are there for a limited time. Did anyone really complain about how weapons unlocked via challenges that you complete when you can? This system can be even more frustrating especially when the tracker doesn't measure correctly leaving me frustrated when I just got done doing a challenge and THE TRACKER NOT COUNTING IT! Also I know the rest of the factions are coming but it gets boring having to play as only British and the Germans for this long on the same maps. I would honestly like a night version of some of these maps to add variety.

    Honestly, I'm going to wait until the many problems are fixed before going back.    … Expand
  12. 12HD
    Aug 25, 2019
    4
    The game still has lots of glitches, very slow loading and when you sometimes scope in this game it takes forever! This game has been becoming unenjoyable...
  13. Snezzy
    Aug 19, 2019
    4
    Boring story, and a severe lack of content on the multiplayer side. The controls are super clunky and it's just a boring game after the first couple hours
  14. Rockygun1232
    Oct 3, 2019
    4
    Let me get something out of the way, i actually wanted this game to be good. I wasn't caught up in the controversies from the beginning. I have waited nearly a year to review the game to see how it would come out in late 2019. I can tell that this game is a disappointment, the campaign is lazy.

    The campaign isn't fun i thought it would be a improvement from battlefield 1 which had a    Let me get something out of the way, i actually wanted this game to be good. I wasn't caught up in the controversies from the beginning. I have waited nearly a year to review the game to see how it would come out in late 2019. I can tell that this game is a disappointment, the campaign is lazy.

    The campaign isn't fun i thought it would be a improvement from battlefield 1 which had a great campaign. All parts of the campaigns are of small fictionalized battles with no consequences. It doesn't feel like ww2. When you think of ww2 you think of D-day, battle of the bulge, battle of Britain, Dunkirk, stalingrad, iwo gima, etc. Instead you get random very obscure battles (or made up battles). These battles are usually inaccurate like a women replacing the commando who destroyed the German heavy water plant, British commandos are portrayed as criminals, the racism about the Tirailleur is exaggerated, and the last tiger doesn't even have naiz symbols.

    Multiplayer is actually pretty decent but it was short of content on launch and still now. The maps aren't as good and battlefield 1 since their too damn big with no big point everyone fights over. The gun play is pretty great, but this is hurt by squads being smaller, and class guns being very limited.

    Overall underwhelming    … Expand
  15. Mike_the_Bear
    Oct 20, 2019
    4
    Sadly, this one’s a huge disappointment for me on PS4. BF1 graphics were better. BFV has massive optimisation issues to say the least. Framerate drops during achievements, textures take a while to load. Each update introduces more bugs than fixes. You need to grind to unlock cosmetics / face paints that won’t load on time for other players to see anyway. Most cosmetics cannot be purchasedSadly, this one’s a huge disappointment for me on PS4. BF1 graphics were better. BFV has massive optimisation issues to say the least. Framerate drops during achievements, textures take a while to load. Each update introduces more bugs than fixes. You need to grind to unlock cosmetics / face paints that won’t load on time for other players to see anyway. Most cosmetics cannot be purchased with in-game currency but actual money. Very few maps, modes and content. Servers empty for the Battle Royale mode which was one of the few good surprises about this BFV. Cheaters and hackers (how do you get hackers on console?!). A pretty bad episode. Only plus is the atmosphere and audio which are quite immersive and gratifying.… Expand
  16. WinstonSmith72
    Jan 8, 2020
    4
    The flight controls are a **** shambles, honestly, laughably, stupiddd
    Isn't this long enough for a review?
  17. PlayerGoku
    Jun 22, 2020
    4
    Modo Campaña bastante mediocre considerando que dura alrededor de 4 horas y son 4 Historias las cuales son medio aburridas ha excepcion de la ultima que si tenia algo interesante, El modo Multijigador lo encontre aburrido en general y el modo Firestorm (Battle Royale) No voy a opinar, Porque NO, No pienso esperar 20 Minutos para jugar una partida, Tal vez si hacian el Battle RoyaleModo Campaña bastante mediocre considerando que dura alrededor de 4 horas y son 4 Historias las cuales son medio aburridas ha excepcion de la ultima que si tenia algo interesante, El modo Multijigador lo encontre aburrido en general y el modo Firestorm (Battle Royale) No voy a opinar, Porque NO, No pienso esperar 20 Minutos para jugar una partida, Tal vez si hacian el Battle Royale Free-To-Play lo habrian salvado, Pero no fue asi, En resumen Juego aburrido … Expand
  18. Runnerino35
    May 4, 2020
    4
    Я ебал какая хуевая игра. Я заплатил за неё 6000 руб, а она закрывается этим летом. Разрабы ебанулись, идите нахуй с этим своим феминизмом. Ладно феминизм, так ко всему этому игра блять не играется, она не работает. Куча багов, лагов +в fullHD работает и выглядет через жопу. Пошли нахуй с этой парашей. Вангую, Battlefield 6 будет про войну в палеозое за независимых женщин. ;)Я ебал какая хуевая игра. Я заплатил за неё 6000 руб, а она закрывается этим летом. Разрабы ебанулись, идите нахуй с этим своим феминизмом. Ладно феминизм, так ко всему этому игра блять не играется, она не работает. Куча багов, лагов +в fullHD работает и выглядет через жопу. Пошли нахуй с этой парашей. Вангую, Battlefield 6 будет про войну в палеозое за независимых женщин. ;)
  19. Spoonks
    Jun 28, 2021
    4
    Huge Downgrade compared to Battlefield 1. The game felt like a copy-paste from Battlefield 1, but EA edited out the parts that made Battlefield 1 so great.

    I was never a huge fan of Battlefield, I've played 4/5 in the past. I thought both were fun, but I was never addicted them. Until Battlefield 1 came out and I found myself absolutely loving it, probably the best FPS i've ever played.    Huge Downgrade compared to Battlefield 1. The game felt like a copy-paste from Battlefield 1, but EA edited out the parts that made Battlefield 1 so great.

    I was never a huge fan of Battlefield, I've played 4/5 in the past. I thought both were fun, but I was never addicted them. Until Battlefield 1 came out and I found myself absolutely loving it, probably the best FPS i've ever played. i if BF1 was the furture of battlefield, then i am indeed a Battlefield fan.

    The War stories were really unconfusing and didn't feel war-like. I enjoyed all six war stories from Battlefield 1 but I only enjoyed one single war story in Battlefield V (I.E The Last Tiger). The multiplayer was terrible until updates came. The maps gave me "Camp or die" vibes, because camping was a very common strategy compared to most battlefield games. The enemy characters blended in perfectly with the map which made it difficult to kill enemy players.

    War in the Pacific was the greatest of all updates, the maps didn't have the camp or die vibes I was used to and felt different. Non like the rest of the BFV maps that were the same four maps in the same country.

    The Battleroyale gamemode was fun the first ten matches, but eventually got boring. Boins and the skins on the item shop was clearly trying to cash out on Fortnite. Most of the skins didn't look war-like, rather looked like realistic fortnite skins or Mad Max characters. The Skins wern't terrible, but didn't belong in a World War 2 setting.

    I wouldn't recommend Battlefield V for any hardcore Battlefield Fan or history buff.    … Expand
  20. MatheusBug007
    Jun 30, 2020
    4
    jogo nuito fraco, com mapas muito ruins e uma gameplay que não te prende. Além de ser mais um jogo do passado, espero que volte pra era moderna
  21. MuellerWI
    Jul 2, 2020
    4
    DICE has fallen so far since Battlefield 3. One would think it would be difficult for DICE to fall lower than the state Battlefield 4 released in but they've managed to outdo themselves with Battlefield 5. it's baffling how DICE managed to underdeliver on a World War II game.

    Not only did they lie to the community about not nerfing TTK but they also completely left the Russians out of    DICE has fallen so far since Battlefield 3. One would think it would be difficult for DICE to fall lower than the state Battlefield 4 released in but they've managed to outdo themselves with Battlefield 5. it's baffling how DICE managed to underdeliver on a World War II game.

    Not only did they lie to the community about not nerfing TTK but they also completely left the Russians out of the game and never delivered maps from pinnacle World War II moments (aside from a couple in the Pacific). DICE also managed to create on their worst menu experience to date and failed to deliver on essential roadmap items.    … Expand
  22. SourApple
    Jul 19, 2020
    4
    The story is super disappointing, not sure if you can even call it a story. Battlefield should take its previous games story’s as an example such as bf3 and bf4 which were incredibly action packed. The multiplayer feels awkward and boring. Not the WW2 game everyone was waiting for.
  23. M1sfiT__
    Aug 23, 2020
    4
    As peculiaridades da Dice continuam ali. Quando vc mata vários inimigos com HS de sniper e ele começa a fazer a contagem baixinho. Os detalhes, gráficos. Maravilhosos. A gunplay é muito boa também, mas a imersão simplesmente não existe. É um jogo de guerra com armas antigas. Não tem nada de segunda guerra. O feeling, nada.
  24. Glemial
    Jun 22, 2021
    4
    Playing this game after BF1 is so **** disappointing. Actually this game is worse than it's predecessor in every single aspect, and here is why:
    None of the multiplayer maps are interesting
    Too game is totally unpolished, having too many bugs The atmosphere is trash, as you don't feel like you are at the WWII any time Vehicles are too overpower, as you constantly see tanks from the    Playing this game after BF1 is so **** disappointing. Actually this game is worse than it's predecessor in every single aspect, and here is why:
    None of the multiplayer maps are interesting
    Too game is totally unpolished, having too many bugs
    The atmosphere is trash, as you don't feel like you are at the WWII any time
    Vehicles are too overpower, as you constantly see tanks from the other side of the map killing everyone and no one can fight back. The same happens with planes, because the AA tanks are totally useless against it, as you needs too much AA shots to kill the planes, but it can one hit destroy your tank with a bomb. The only useful counter planes in this game is the fliegerfaust or another plane.
    The recon class is useless on console, and you never see any being top 5 in scoreboard
    The weapons are too unbalanced, with some being so much superior than others
    The story mode is a complete waste of time. None of the stories are interesting
    How in the hell can a game be about the WWII and do not have USSR, France and Italy there? Seriously DICE?
    And now is time to the visibility problem, which is the worst of all. I have never played a game with a so bad visibility in my gaming experience! There is times that the enemy is in your front, but you don't see him. And don't come with the excuse of this being good camouflage, because even the people with microtransaction clothing that the color has nothing similar to the environment is hard to see in this game. If you are prone you can became invisible in that game. There was one time i was prone in the bridge of Twisted Steel and at least 15 enemies passed by me without noticing my presence. Then i backstabbed 4 guys with a knife before die LOL

    So, i give this game a 4 only because with friends you can have some time of fun, but i do not recommend anyone to buy it    … Expand
  25. chernandez31
    Feb 23, 2022
    4
    Sad. Why do these companies keep messing up WWII games? It’s insane. Just copy and paste the WWII aspect onto BF1 and you’re done, it’s that simple. Such a shame. And it has a garbage single player story.
  26. Artex33Gaming
    May 1, 2023
    4
    It is almost unplayable because of the hackers.
    Without hackers, it would be a 7/10. Play Battlefield 1 instead.
  27. uazzz007
    Nov 10, 2020
    3
    This is the worst battlefield ever. Some classes like support are just nerfed to the ground, new **** mechanics, snipers are OP. The color palette is so **** bright that sometimes it is hard to see an enemy. Soldiers uniforms are confusing sometimes because of skins (and thats not only my problem. i saw many times my teammates tried to shoot me). TTK is hight. Snipers - op as **** lots ofThis is the worst battlefield ever. Some classes like support are just nerfed to the ground, new **** mechanics, snipers are OP. The color palette is so **** bright that sometimes it is hard to see an enemy. Soldiers uniforms are confusing sometimes because of skins (and thats not only my problem. i saw many times my teammates tried to shoot me). TTK is hight. Snipers - op as **** lots of maps where it is hard to hide. Is modern level design is just a flat surface and a bunch of rocks? A lot of open spaces where you are just like shooting dummy. Global operations don't have narrative logic coz no matter if you win or lose - you still gonna start "A new day" on the next location what is just baloney and doesn't make any sense. Submachine gun are no more a weapon - just garbage. Bipod mechanics doesn't work properly and cause you pain in the ass. New health system - **** that makes you play safer and force new players to camp. There is no such thing in this game that works just right. If the next game will be that bad - the series is dead.
    PS. Just a tip. Fire your game designer - He doesn't know his game and why do people play Battlefied...    … Expand
  28. v3it
    Mar 3, 2019
    3
    Long time battlefield veteran (250h 1945, 350h bf2bc, 200h bfviet, 600h bf3, 400h bf4, 500h bf1, 180h bfv = almost 2500h bf - not to be continued) extremely disappointed!

    Some things can be forgiven or just overlooked. Others cant. This game is a complete disgrace for everything battlefield once might have been famous for; and im not talking about minor inaccuritys. - flawed    Long time battlefield veteran (250h 1945, 350h bf2bc, 200h bfviet, 600h bf3, 400h bf4, 500h bf1, 180h bfv = almost 2500h bf - not to be continued) extremely disappointed!

    Some things can be forgiven or just overlooked. Others cant.
    This game is a complete disgrace for everything battlefield once might have been famous for; and im not talking about minor inaccuritys.

    - flawed gameplay / gunplay, feeling of being hit, visibility of enemys, movement (alot of the times you cant even jump tiny ledges)
    - bug and glitches / just everywhere, wont start cuz cant finish...
    - no content / month after release of a full price game still no new maps (8 maps to play, at least half of them real trash and no fun to play at all, random map generator could do better), only 2 factions in a ww2 game (you must be kidding "lets see how far we can go, how much of a joke this game can get and people still preorder the luxury edition - hahahaha" **** off dice....)
    - poor design / implementation of grand operations (just put a "grand" into it; makes it a whole lot better right?) what happened to the great introduction themes of bf1 operations, the cool maps of bf3, the variation of tools and vehicles of bf4? this game is plain empty

    I give it a 3/10 just out of pure sentimental reason. loved you battlefield. I am done with you. Hope you stay dead. You should leave it alone. Rest in peace!!!

    To make it simple. This game is a joke and more a torture to play than fun whatsoever.    … Expand
  29. BBUENO
    Jan 13, 2019
    3
    Je sanctionne sévèrement car je trouve indécent de réécrire une guerre historique aussi importante que la deuxième guerre mondiale pour "mieux" convenir aux idéaux commerciales de 2019.
    Il y a des gosses qui apprennent l'histoire par les jeux.
    Encore Call Of Duty ou Medal of Honor traitent très bien le sujet mais là sur ce BF5 c'est ridicule. La vraie Histoire de l'humanité n'est t'elle    Je sanctionne sévèrement car je trouve indécent de réécrire une guerre historique aussi importante que la deuxième guerre mondiale pour "mieux" convenir aux idéaux commerciales de 2019.
    Il y a des gosses qui apprennent l'histoire par les jeux.
    Encore Call Of Duty ou Medal of Honor traitent très bien le sujet mais là sur ce BF5 c'est ridicule.
    La vraie Histoire de l'humanité n'est t'elle pas suffisamment vendeuse pour EA ?
    Désolé mais l'égalité homme femme en 1940 à l'armée ça n'existait pas.
    J'ai rien contre le fait de mettre en avant le rôle des femmes pendant la WW2 bien au contraire mais de les mettres à pieds d'égalité avec les hommes c'est FAUX.
    Encore plus ridicule, transformer les Nazis en simple "nation allemande" ou en "axe" c'est un non sens historique complet.

    Je n'ai rien contre le fait qu'on invente des conflits pour des scénarios de films ou de jeux mais quand on parle histoire il y a un minimum de respect à avoir.

    Sinon le multi est correct, difficile de voir l'évolution depuis BF1 c'est juste des règles de jeux différentes et des sensations de tir un peu ajusté.
    Le jeu bug beaucoup, menu mal optimisé.
    EA va falloir faire mieux que ça.
    M    … Expand
  30. piratuk
    Nov 22, 2018
    3
    Окей, пускай будут девушки, пускай не будет советов. Геймплей окончательно скатился к убогому тиру. Игра не мотивирует координировать действия, нет ощущения масштабности, нет ничего, кроме дрочильни фрагов и... всё. Всё супер плохо.Окей, пускай будут девушки, пускай не будет советов. Геймплей окончательно скатился к убогому тиру. Игра не мотивирует координировать действия, нет ощущения масштабности, нет ничего, кроме дрочильни фрагов и... всё. Всё супер плохо.
Page:

Awards & Rankings

7
#7 Most Discussed PS4 Game of 2018
39
#39 Most Shared PS4 Game of 2018

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
73

Mixed or average reviews - based on 23 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 15 out of 23
  2. Mixed: 8 out of 23
  3. Negative: 0 out of 23
  1. GameCritics
    Dec 27, 2018
    60
    In many ways, Battlefield V feels like a big step backwards for the franchise. The campaign is boring and frustrating, multiplayer is unbalanced, and bugs keep popping up in every mode to ruin the experience. The fortification system is a good shakeup, but the good it brings is tempered by the cumbersome and murky Grand Operations. With some patches, balance changes and bug squashing, BFV could be a fantastic game, but at the moment, this soldier needs to go back to basic training.
    Read full review
  2. Impulsegamer
    Dec 20, 2018
    76
    EA and DICE seem to have lost sight of what made this series a true contender for the FPS crown, and both the gameplay and the content are suffering as a result.
    Read full review
  3. Playstation Official Magazine UK
    Dec 12, 2018
    80
    Ripe with potential but riddled with problems, the new Battlefield will be brilliant six months from now. Right now, however, it’s merely a good shooter. [Issue#157, p.83]
See all critic reviews »