Battlefield V

 PlayStation 4
User Score
2.7

Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 3123 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 538 out of 3123
  2. Mixed: 363 out of 3123
  3. Negative: 2,222 out of 3123
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. M1sfiT
    Sep 3, 2023
    7
    Gaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaameeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeees! bfv
  2. BARAO555
    Jun 17, 2023
    6
    it is a decent game but how could you even make a downgrade from battlefield 1...
  3. Giero
    Jan 3, 2023
    5
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  4. Nreherw
    Nov 15, 2022
    5
    Was a big fan of the series but yeah this is quite an upset to be honest really.
  5. Agt_Killionaire
    Oct 7, 2022
    5
    The story side of this game is it's brighter side. The multiplayer side is where it falls. Weapons unbalanced and scattered fairly through the different roles. The balance between classes is improperly weighted and in turn makes a specific role shine over the others.
  6. Vitalick
    Sep 6, 2022
    5
    Is like the Battlefield one but worst. Little disapointed with this new battlefield. Not a good decision
  7. Zski
    Sep 5, 2022
    7
    After coming off of a franchise high with Battlefield 1, they decided to go to the drawing boards to see what adjustments they can make to have less of a lasting impact and feel closer to every other shooter on the market. That’s not to say BFV is a bad game because it’s not, but it lacks the balance, character, and energy of BF1. The last entry really made most guns a viable option in theAfter coming off of a franchise high with Battlefield 1, they decided to go to the drawing boards to see what adjustments they can make to have less of a lasting impact and feel closer to every other shooter on the market. That’s not to say BFV is a bad game because it’s not, but it lacks the balance, character, and energy of BF1. The last entry really made most guns a viable option in the game, while this game really eliminates 75% of the available guns because some are just overwhelmingly better in every way. Somehow they have also made support, one of the four classes in the game, almost entirely useless and not worth the time. The balancing in this game is far off the marks, even years later in 2022.

    It has a lot of odd game design decisions that made it lose the Battlefield personality to the point where it feels like it’s trying to be other games way too much. The customization is a cool idea, but horribly executed. Every gun can be customized with some ridiculous scope including red dot sights, which completely take away any purpose from the iron sights. But when you have a female soldier with a prosthetic arm, blue face paint, and some really whacky clothing holding a gun that has zero recoil due to poor balancing along with a red dot sight decades before they were invented, it sort of loses its charm and begins to feel like Call of Duty. I know the game is not selling itself as a historically accurate game, but I don’t see the point of trying to make it seem like a WWII game.

    With that being said it’s not a bad game, it’s just an average Battlefield game. There is some fun to be had.

    It does shine in other areas. The level design is very good and really place you into some stunning environments. The destruction physics are fantastic and greatly improved from the last game. Some of the new modes are pretty entertaining. It does some things right. All in all, you can have some fun with the game, but it’s a very disappointing entry in the franchise. Too often it feels like Call of Duty mixed with Battlefield game modes, instead of just using what the franchise already does well and did exceptionally well just prior in Battlefield 1.    … Expand
  8. Herwp
    Sep 1, 2022
    5
    the game doesn't have much content and no support from the developers already made this not good
  9. BrianDavid94
    Aug 26, 2022
    7
    Quick background on me the reviewer, I tend to like single player games that is heavy on narrative the most. I also play a lot of racing games and use to play multiplayer games in my high school days but now that it's hard for me and my friends to find a good time to link up so now I hardly play any. Up to try any genre of games and sometimes I find something new that I didn't think I'dQuick background on me the reviewer, I tend to like single player games that is heavy on narrative the most. I also play a lot of racing games and use to play multiplayer games in my high school days but now that it's hard for me and my friends to find a good time to link up so now I hardly play any. Up to try any genre of games and sometimes I find something new that I didn't think I'd like. I play on every platform but prefer PlayStation.

    Series is turning in the wrong direction. Devs are including stuff from other games instead of focusing I what seperated them from other games. Get rid of Hero shooter nonsense, add more weapons. Even the marketing team says don't buy if you value authentic history more than the hero shooter stuff. This series forgot what made them a Call of Duty threat. Where has the destruction innovation gone from past games?    … Expand
  10. FrostySlsuhie
    Jul 13, 2022
    7
    It runs very well, but the problems lie in the lack of content as they cut the life-support of this game during its developement as a live service game and the cosmetics reduce the immersion the earlier titles in the franchise had.
  11. ThatPSXBGamer
    Jul 11, 2022
    5
    Wow, this game is absolutely brutal and clearly has piss poor design. I only played the campaign and can't speak for multiplayer, but holy **** does the campaign suck. The graphics, voice acting and overall story are fine, they meet the typical FPS campaign criteria, but God damn does the combat suck. The enemies now kill you at lightning fast speed, surviving is a monotonous chore ofWow, this game is absolutely brutal and clearly has piss poor design. I only played the campaign and can't speak for multiplayer, but holy **** does the campaign suck. The graphics, voice acting and overall story are fine, they meet the typical FPS campaign criteria, but God damn does the combat suck. The enemies now kill you at lightning fast speed, surviving is a monotonous chore of shooting and running, with the occasional duck and crawl from enemy fire. The campaign is 3 stories too many and all feature the same garbage gameplay, some better than others, but all are trash. I beat the campaign at the standard medium difficulty, but here's the kicker......most people didn't. The trophy sits at a measly 10.0% unlock rate. Shame on you EA, shame on your whole design team for this. Now we know why you didn't include a campaign in Battlefield 2042. Go back to the drawing board, fire everyone who designed this laughable, pathetic excuse for a campaign. This game is a 5/10 simply for the graphics, story, and the fact that at least it's beatable, you just gotta have the patience for it.… Expand
  12. angrygamer333
    Jul 7, 2019
    6
    The most dissapointing game of the battlefield franchise I ever played. The matchmaking is slow, the games are not leveled. Just a few guns in the game, most of then reutilised of battlefied 1. The maps are poorly designed and scarce.
    The deluxe edition is a fraud, just ugly skins.
  13. dankmeow
    Mar 16, 2022
    7
    Its battlefield again but it feels it doesnt quite have the "hook". If you can get it cheap give it a go if you like large scale fps.
  14. Vittle
    Feb 23, 2022
    6
    Meh game. Its just meh.
    The movement is greate and you can have alot of fun but Battlefield 1 and Battlefield 4 is way better.
    The last tiger is very good but the Norway one is the most disrespectful thing ever.
  15. Saft_Chri
    Feb 20, 2022
    7
    The game was good, but it had a lot of problems. There was a lot of potential that wasn't used. But it still was fun.
  16. Ferman
    Feb 14, 2022
    6
    However, an average game.The plot is boring, I couldn't even master it to the end.The gameplay itself is clear and tactful, I can't say more about it since everything is so clear
  17. davelolek
    Jan 18, 2022
    5
    I was really in expectations when DICE indicated that BF2042 should be back to the roots of modern/nowadays war, well known from Battlefield 3 where It just works, good atmosphere with good maps and good behaviour of vehicles and aircrafts. But In BF2042 I have a feeling that this good physics is gone, vehicles and aircraft just react too agressive it does not play and it does not lookI was really in expectations when DICE indicated that BF2042 should be back to the roots of modern/nowadays war, well known from Battlefield 3 where It just works, good atmosphere with good maps and good behaviour of vehicles and aircrafts. But In BF2042 I have a feeling that this good physics is gone, vehicles and aircraft just react too agressive it does not play and it does not look good at all. Also classic soldier class are gone! WHY ? This was one of the the best feature of the whole series, now the individual roles have become indistinct. Maybe this game will be better one day. But DEVS should be more interested by opinions of the players, now it's no wonder that Battlefield has lost so many fans.

    I hope the legend returns !!!    … Expand
  18. Catharsiuse
    Jan 6, 2022
    7
    This is not only great game but also, a great story! It is deep and exciting without "fedex' quests. That' is something that for example
  19. YuryKor
    Dec 20, 2021
    7
    Начал играть через год после релиза (взял на скидках). Понимаю тех кто ставил 0 баллов.
    Мой личный опыт, за ту цену которую я заплатил, более положительный.
  20. RobdogReviews
    Dec 18, 2021
    6
    What can I say. 9th of November 2018 this game had the **** launch ever in battlefield history. As I thought it would be dead they revived the game base with a fun Pacific DLC which really showed out the battlefield franchise. Eventually, it just got boring and firestorm was good as dead, Averaging at least 10-30 minutes to just find people searching for firestorm which you weren't evenWhat can I say. 9th of November 2018 this game had the **** launch ever in battlefield history. As I thought it would be dead they revived the game base with a fun Pacific DLC which really showed out the battlefield franchise. Eventually, it just got boring and firestorm was good as dead, Averaging at least 10-30 minutes to just find people searching for firestorm which you weren't even guaranteed to find a full lobby. Later on down the track, this game started becoming fun. I was a big plane fanatic using the overpowered Stuka B-2 with the twin cannons which were eventually nerfed and the still crazy up2 date Mosquito with the 4000kg Bomb. I can say that this game really does have its fun moments and the times were you just die and respawn over and over again but nothing less to say, The campaign.

    The masterpiece of battlefield 5. You start off fighting on different fronts in each participating country of ww2 in the prologue. Starting from parachuting into an enemy gunfight to utilising a tank and plane which in my opinion was great. Though this is where it kinda let down. As much as each of the cutscenes were amazing and had lots of emotion to it, It really felt like you were just running around for hours killing Ai's and not really going through a story. For example the mission where you have to take out enemy stukas stored in a hanger you had to traverse across the entire map taking out radars and run around for atleast 2 hours. As im a trophy hunter i had to complete this game on veteran and it was just painful completing boring missions. Though the stealth missions were amazing and the last tiger story was one of my favourite storys of all time.

    Multiplayer is just what it is at the moment there is really nothing you can do. There are some things i would change to guns including the Type2A. As i have played this game since launch overpowered guns are just something that ruin the fanbase. Dont get me started on the Model 37 Shotgun i could ramble on for hours.

    Lastly, this game has its sparks with the campaign and the heartfelt storyline that it presents to us players but there is just so much bad stuff done in this game as listed above. At the end of the day, I would give this game a 4/10 but being generous as I still play this game to today I'm giving this a 6/10 as it's somewhat enjoyable. Ignoring the fact I've deleted it twice out of pure rage    … Expand
  21. EdenDestroyer
    Dec 18, 2021
    7
    This is the only battlefield (other than BF1) that I can play from india without severe ping issues. The gunplay feels great as an infantry player, it’s super easy to unlock new guns, the movement is smooth and the maps are alright. I enjoy this game for what it is. It’s nothing groundbreaking, but a solid shooter nonetheless and worth playing.
  22. EM8
    Nov 28, 2021
    7
    *****************************-7’8-********************************************
  23. OscarAdcock
    Nov 17, 2021
    7
    Surprised this has such ridiculously low user scores, as in my opinion it has the best gunplay in the series. Really enjoy all aspects of BF5's multiplayer I've sunk dozens of hours across all maps, and I really think the game is in a great state now with balanced guns and a detailed and interesting variety of locations. However do not even try playing the campaign, it sucks dick.
  24. Player848
    Nov 15, 2021
    7
    Из "-":

    Подобные войны это печально, потому и -1. Нет серверов на территории РФ: -1. Двойное Лицемерие - нет армии СССР, но добавили армии США и Японии, которых не было изначально, разработчики EA лжецы и лицемеры: -1. Из "+": Да же с большим пингом: нормальный полёт снаряда - трассера в голову. На максимальную длину прорисовки трассера снаряда можно попасть в голову, проверено.    Из "-":

    Подобные войны это печально, потому и -1.
    Нет серверов на территории РФ: -1.
    Двойное Лицемерие - нет армии СССР, но добавили армии США и Японии, которых не было изначально, разработчики EA лжецы и лицемеры: -1.

    Из "+":
    Да же с большим пингом: нормальный полёт снаряда - трассера в голову. На максимальную длину прорисовки трассера снаряда можно попасть в голову, проверено.
  25. 613th
    Nov 5, 2021
    6
    Do not understand such different marks for this part and for Battlefield 1, because BF1 was terrible and boring but this game I really liked.

    Beautiful and interesting stories in solo campaign. They are so cinematic and so impressive with all these characters and storylines. Maybe it is because of my low expectations. Yes, here is rather standart multiplayer mode with all it's    Do not understand such different marks for this part and for Battlefield 1, because BF1 was terrible and boring but this game I really liked.

    Beautiful and interesting stories in solo campaign. They are so cinematic and so impressive with all these characters and storylines. Maybe it is because of my low expectations.

    Yes, here is rather standart multiplayer mode with all it's problems and sameness, but in this game I even played online for some hours.

    So, classic shooter with the main online-part for the most players and the great solo part as for me.    … Expand
  26. carlosmponce25
    Sep 6, 2021
    5
    En honor a tu nombre, te mereces un 5. Solo puedo decir eso, BFV tuvo muchísimo potencial, gracias al esfuerzo de todos los desarrolladores en el excelente Battlefield 1. En serio pudiste ser grande, tenías todo para triunfar, la segunda guerra mundial es un conflicto a gran escala y llena de datos con anécdotas históricas, tu solo tiraste eso al bote, eliminado facciones de sumaEn honor a tu nombre, te mereces un 5. Solo puedo decir eso, BFV tuvo muchísimo potencial, gracias al esfuerzo de todos los desarrolladores en el excelente Battlefield 1. En serio pudiste ser grande, tenías todo para triunfar, la segunda guerra mundial es un conflicto a gran escala y llena de datos con anécdotas históricas, tu solo tiraste eso al bote, eliminado facciones de suma importancia para la guerra y reduciendo el conflicto a los cliché bélicos más famosos, pero bueno, eso es solo en lo histórico; en lo demás, pecas de diversión y contenido, punto. (Gracias PS Plus por regalar este juego, porque no merece la pena comprarlo).… Expand
  27. Semyon_McDale
    Aug 20, 2021
    7
    Игра неплохая с хорошими картами,но игра довольно быстро надоедает,сделать убийство в ней довольно тяжело.Но графика в игре на высоте,разрушаемость неплохая. Так же играть за чёрных как-то не очень.
  28. FRIST_008
    Aug 5, 2021
    6
    Впервые встретил столько багов на плойке. Ещё и русский язык есть в перечислениях озвучек на главной странице, а его нет. Полный обман!!!

    Конечно сюжета 5ой батлы хуже чем у первой, там такой стелс чуть ли не - обязательный есть, что аж тупит... Без него ракетные удары просто ваншотят. Примерные мысли гейм дизайнера: - Игра про войну, про нереальное единство единиц юнитов и техники    Впервые встретил столько багов на плойке. Ещё и русский язык есть в перечислениях озвучек на главной странице, а его нет. Полный обман!!!

    Конечно сюжета 5ой батлы хуже чем у первой, там такой стелс чуть ли не - обязательный есть, что аж тупит... Без него ракетные удары просто ваншотят.

    Примерные мысли гейм дизайнера:
    - Игра про войну, про нереальное единство единиц юнитов и техники одновременно на карте... а давайте сюжетку всю про партизанский стелс и чтобы со спины ножака давать... это же наша аудитория... Мы же стелс игру пилим... Что дайс творит.....    … Expand
  29. SenkaiSora
    Aug 1, 2021
    5
    I got this game with PS Plus and for a 'free' game it was quite good but not nearly the standard that a battlefield game should be in my opinion.

    The campaign, despite being so short with only 4 stories each having 3 missions lasting approximately 8hrs in total, was very repetitive and the stories themselves weren't the best. I found that too much of the campaign was encouraging    I got this game with PS Plus and for a 'free' game it was quite good but not nearly the standard that a battlefield game should be in my opinion.

    The campaign, despite being so short with only 4 stories each having 3 missions lasting approximately 8hrs in total, was very repetitive and the stories themselves weren't the best. I found that too much of the campaign was encouraging stealth, when the stealth gameplay wasn't the best. I would much rather if the majority of the campaign was focused around big battles and open warfare as that's when the gameplay did really shine. Instead, much of the campaign is spent alone where stealth was really the best option. It was only in the 3rd chapter 'Tirailleur' that you get the opportunity to fight alongside your fellow troops in a more familiar open warfare setting, and that along with the more captivating story made this chapter easily the best in my opinion.

    One annoyance I had though was that much of the dialogue in these missions was told during the missions in the native language of the chapter's protagonist. This was fine for the first chapter which had an English protagonist, but the subsequent chapters all featured non-Enlgish speaking characters. Reading the subtitles, while trying to play got very annoying and I definitely missed a few lines. I just feel like it would be better to have all the dialogue in English, or avoid having any dialogue during the gameplay to make it easier to understand.

    My final complaint about the campaign is that until the final chapter (which was added post-launch), there are no missions that even encourage using any kind of vehicles. I would've loved a flight based mission but instead all you get is 1 or 2 opportunities to hop in a plane which I didn't even find very useful for what the missions required. I just feel like the vehicles in the game could've been utilised more to spice up the campaign and a vehicle-based mission could've easily replaced a stealth section in one of the first 3 chapters to reduce the restiveness that these missions suffered with.

    Overall, I thought the multiplayer was a lot better than the campaign, though that's to be expected with a Battlefield game. That said, I think it still had a few problems.

    I found that the squad system was quite a nice feature, but for solo players who would be less coordinated, I feel like they are put at a bit of a disadvantage. Ammo is quite limited as well as med kits (health regenerates quite slowly on its own) and without coordinating with your team you can be left in a bad situation if you lack medics or support classes for example. These classes have the ability to restock your med kits and ammo respectively, and with a coordinated squad I think this opens up for a bit of strategic planning but as a solo player it could just lead to frustration if your squad mates don't play with you or if you play the same classes.

    In terms of game modes, BFV offers a good selection of different activities. Unfortunately, at my time of playing, the multiplayer population had dropped off quite a bit. I could still find games for every mode, but for the less popular ones it could take a while. Therefore, I spent the majority of my time playing Grand Operations and Strategic/Tactical Conquest. I found all of these modes quite fun, with Tactical conquest being my favourite. This mode was a more infantry based mode, with less/no vehicles and the maps tended to be more closed. I quite liked this, since it was a bit easier for me as a solo player to play with my teammates. On the larger maps in Grand Operations or Strategic Conquest, I just felt like it was easy to feel very separated from your team. That might just be because I'm more used to smaller scale shooters though. I do appreciate the choice to separate the modes like this, as it made it easy for someone like me who doesn't love the vehicle combat to avoid it.

    Overall, the multiplayer was just fine for me. It didn't offer anything special in my opinion but it did a pretty good job at being an enjoyable shooter I could waste a couple of hours on. For anyone considering buying BFV at this point I honestly wouldn't really recommend it. If you enjoy shooters, chances are you've already played better games than this and if you rarely play shooters, I feel like there are much better games you can get for the same price or cheaper.

    If you have redeemed BFV on PS Plus and are on the fence about playing though, I would recommend giving it a go. Like I said, it's a good game to waste a few hours on and I would say it's worth playing through the last 2 chapters of the campaign at least.    … Expand
  30. KepasaAmigo
    Jul 10, 2021
    7
    Not the best one out there. we can only hope for some better one next time maybe. Campain is just above average. 7/10
  31. solelyric
    Jun 18, 2021
    6
    The graphics, sound design and atmosphere are excellent. However, the gunplay wasn't as tight as Battlefield 1. The loading times are too long and the game although excellent overall lacks that novelty factor.
  32. MastroCicuta
    May 30, 2021
    5
    Been a fan of the series since the glorious Bad Company 2, I can tell you this is one of the WORST Battlefield to date.
    Tried it with the Xbox Pass (may2021), and thanks God, because I would have regret buying it.
    Technically speaking is beautiful. Nothing to argue there. Maybe a little bit too many lighting effects can bother you when aiming down sight but other than this, it's visually    Been a fan of the series since the glorious Bad Company 2, I can tell you this is one of the WORST Battlefield to date.
    Tried it with the Xbox Pass (may2021), and thanks God, because I would have regret buying it.
    Technically speaking is beautiful. Nothing to argue there. Maybe a little bit too many lighting effects can bother you when aiming down sight but other than this, it's visually and functionally a masterpiece.
    The problem is about the gameplay. To date, basically all game modes are dead but deathmatch, conquest and breakthrough, very little else. It is sad because the game has many interesting modes but apparently it doesn't incentive players playing them.
    Balance issues with vehicles in particular aircrafts in general: it's very simple they are too powerful and ruin the game. I really hope they will eventually decide to completely remove them from future installments of the franchise, helicopters are more counterable but they must be kept in check to avoid the same stuff happening in BFBC2 or 3. They simply sink out the fun from the vast majority of the players in favour of very few skilled pilots, which with the tools at our disposal too often seem to be impossible to take down. I think that the game should be enjoyed by everybody not just a small portion of the player base.
    TTK is actually fine, it is in my opinion a good balance between reaction time and aiming even tho the weapon become less effective very quickly at longer distances. The problem with the weapons is that classes are very "rigid", set in stone, with very little customization, there are more flexible ones (assault) and more limited/straightforward (recon, medic). You have for the most part stick with the weapon of your class and there are no "free for all classes" weapons like it used to in the previous title. Weapon themselves are very little customizable, with a lot more effort being put in the cosmetic side of things rather than the practical one. The result is that progressing through the weapons unlock is not really rewarding,you unlock perks rather than actual weapon parts, so there is no actual way to say for example, set a custom stock, longer or shorter barrel, somewhat of a silencer (it's hard I know it's ww2 after all)... nothing like that. Dull, and boring.
    Ultimately because of the sheer amount of explosions, vehicles and number of players the game is really too chaotic at times, and even if it manages to draw a very nice portrait of what fighting during ww2 was like, game wise it becomes too easy to die from random stuff happening at the same time.
    64 players at the same time maybe a lot of fun at first but probably 32 or 48 is better if you want to have a minimum of a tactical approach. You can theoretically search for 32 game lobbies but there are basically none which is again, kind of a shame.
    I think that the franchise should focus more into making more "guerrilla warfare" games rather than world war scale, in order to reduce the amount of randomness happening into the game. A new Battlefield is very close to the announce, let's hope for the best.    … Expand
  33. SuperDuck23
    May 22, 2021
    5
    Exactly what you’d expect from this type of game and nothing more. Uninspired and yawn-inducing.
  34. MetaRogue
    May 21, 2021
    5
    Despite it's competence, I find Battlefield V to be a dull FPS game, mostly because most of the game's content is geared towards multiplayer. There are only three story missions that are all approximately 2 hours in length (giving you about 6 hours of campaign), but two of these rely heavily on stealth, which is something the Battlefield franchise is NOT about.

    Battlefield V may be a    Despite it's competence, I find Battlefield V to be a dull FPS game, mostly because most of the game's content is geared towards multiplayer. There are only three story missions that are all approximately 2 hours in length (giving you about 6 hours of campaign), but two of these rely heavily on stealth, which is something the Battlefield franchise is NOT about.

    Battlefield V may be a very good looking game, but the WW2 setting is a tired and overly well-worn veteran FPS premise.    … Expand
  35. Volblood67
    May 16, 2021
    5
    Hikaye konusunda bir şey söyleyemem oynamadım hiçbir zamanda bu oyunu hikayesi için almadım. Multiplayer kötü adamlar gerçekçilik katayım derken oyunda türle mantıksız hatalar yapmışlar.
  36. memokmo
    May 10, 2021
    6
    Story is not good as expected. It is not important either. Many people such as me buys this game for multiplayer. And I think something is wrong with multiplayer. I don't know what but I really enjoyed Battlefield 1's multiplayer and I was expecting the same etrentainment from BFV. But it wasn't. It wasn't boring but I think Bf 1 is still a lot better.
  37. Empyrea
    Apr 3, 2021
    7
    I have played the opening and the three missions and it's ok but nothing relevant. The story of the game would deserve a 7 or an 8. I can't speak about the online game. I haven't played the mission called The last tiger because I have limited internet and the update were like 65 gb. Without the update I found some issues but they were not a big deal. I played the mission of Norway inI have played the opening and the three missions and it's ok but nothing relevant. The story of the game would deserve a 7 or an 8. I can't speak about the online game. I haven't played the mission called The last tiger because I have limited internet and the update were like 65 gb. Without the update I found some issues but they were not a big deal. I played the mission of Norway in normal difficulty and the rest in easy because I was tired of dying a lot. And yes it's short, about 6 hours or so (depending on how good or bad you are). To sum up, good game but nothing special.… Expand
  38. Indi428
    Mar 6, 2021
    7
    The story idea is quite good although the various storylines are all too short to get you engaged with the characters. The multiplayer is fun although it all feels like a bit of a let down after how amazing Battlefield 1 was.
  39. Dragonfly44
    Feb 24, 2021
    7
    This feels pretty much exactly like Battlefield One with minimal improvements, but it's still quite fun. 76/100
  40. OldAndCynical
    Jan 18, 2021
    5
    Battlefield 1 had excellent single player campaigns, which were joy to play thru. This made the game worthy purchase even for us offline gamers.
    Sadly, Battlefield V is nowhere near as good in single player content. Campaigns are there, but sadly, the game mechanics are so bad compared to BF1 that they are torture to play thru. Flying especially. I mean there are missions where you can,    Battlefield 1 had excellent single player campaigns, which were joy to play thru. This made the game worthy purchase even for us offline gamers.
    Sadly, Battlefield V is nowhere near as good in single player content. Campaigns are there, but sadly, the game mechanics are so bad compared to BF1 that they are torture to play thru. Flying especially. I mean there are missions where you can, in theory, steal a plane and use it to destroy objectives, but as the flight mechanics are so bad, you usually just end up blowing yourself up.
    I really do not get how they could mess up the main mechanics so bad, given how fluid BF1 was to play. So, 5/10. And if you're looking for a single player war game, avoid this.    … Expand
  41. Arya977
    Jan 10, 2021
    6
    Gameplay..............Amazing
    Graphics................Amazing
    Story.......................Poor
    Score.....................Great
  42. Glc0009
    Dec 19, 2020
    6
    Oloco bixo brincadeira meu oito e sete pra galera bixo agora é hora das videocassetadas galera
  43. AcidCasual
    Dec 15, 2020
    6
    As Battlefield has progressed you can see how hard they 'try' to give you the best experience possible in a first person shooter. Unfortunately they have crammed so much in that it's become a beautiful tragedy. None of the levels feel epic or have any main focal point to fight over, this is probably done so that there's pockets of fighting all over the map. The problem then with consoleAs Battlefield has progressed you can see how hard they 'try' to give you the best experience possible in a first person shooter. Unfortunately they have crammed so much in that it's become a beautiful tragedy. None of the levels feel epic or have any main focal point to fight over, this is probably done so that there's pockets of fighting all over the map. The problem then with console gamers who don't use their headpieces, there's total lack of team work, making the experience scatty.

    The ability to build fortresses is a great idea but has never really proved itself to be a valuable part of the gameplay and in many cases seems pointless as maps generally are too open.

    The UI outside of the game is sluggish and in-game feels overdone, you can reduce the HUD which is always a welcome touch.

    In BFV The guns feels so restricted, I don't know if it's because of the era i.e. WW2 or it's just that they don't feel weighted, or tactile. I remember playing previous games and wanting to shoot my rifle to hear the sounds, see the bullets drop and hit walls far away. Now there's none of that atmosphere which separated it from other games like COD.

    With these great explosions, sounds and detail, it seems to have turned the game into a cinematic you feel detached from.

    It all feels like you are being pulled in one direction with the Battlefield franchise and have no way of creating your own experience and in turn, is taking all the excitement away.    … Expand
  44. Benedickt
    Dec 14, 2020
    6
    A lot of bugs, lack of content at the start, unfulfilled promises, mockery of the Battlefield community, lack of new gameplay, mockery of war veterans make this game just disgusting. The Battlefield series of games has never seen such a disgrace. The only thing in this" game " is done well, so it's graphics and music, and this is bad. Thank you Electronic Arts for this WONDERFUL GAME
  45. Maxsio8
    Dec 5, 2020
    6
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. (DISCLAIMER: I am not trying to offend anyone and I am just giving an honest review). Battlefield V tries to be a accurate depiction of World War 2 and it fails. The war stories are really shallow and it is quite clear that it is trying to push a feminist agenda. And I am not angry because women are in the game, just take a look at Battlefield 1. It includes a woman in the story and everyone is fine with it because there is a REASON. The only reason I have not rated Battlefield V a 2 is because of the multiplayer. The mechanics have been refined and the progression system is good. There was also quite a variety of maps at launch. I would be damned if I did not mention all of the bugs. They were a big problem for the game at launch and even though it mostly has been fixed you can still spot a couple of bugs that have not been fixed. Overall I would recommend Battlefield V for people who just like to shoot at other people in Multiplayer but for the single player lover this is a huge NO. EA and DICE please do not screw up Battlefield 6 or whatever it will be called.… Expand
  46. Slashrus
    Dec 3, 2020
    7
    Cool, but Bf1 be better, EA stop selling boxes, do are good gameplay game!!!!
  47. nexus151196
    Sep 10, 2020
    6
    В мультиплеер не играл. Сюжет :Нет СССР, коротко , не интересно. Плюс за графику , стрельбу и звук.
  48. jerrypulpfictio
    Aug 29, 2020
    6
    Amazing graphics, sound FX and animations, eveything else quite the same and story runs too fast.
  49. GabFire
    Aug 10, 2020
    7
    Esse jogo conseguiu destruir o que eu conhecia como ''Battlefield'', aliás, foi a EA Games como sempre. Ainda me pergunto, por que colocaram Battle Royale num jogo de temática ''Primeira Guerra Mundial'', coisa de idiota que só quer dinheiro, quem será que agi assim todos os dias conosco?!
  50. PatMc1896
    Aug 1, 2020
    5
    Mostly enjoyable gameplay with obviously great graphics etc from before however the lack of well known ww2 settings became annoying along with the sparse updates and delays made me keep away from the game for long periods , Little progression and release of the game with delays again killed my hype for it , the best content was probably when the Japanese and Americans where introduced .Mostly enjoyable gameplay with obviously great graphics etc from before however the lack of well known ww2 settings became annoying along with the sparse updates and delays made me keep away from the game for long periods , Little progression and release of the game with delays again killed my hype for it , the best content was probably when the Japanese and Americans where introduced . Unless you buy cosmetics with real life money you’re character looks plain also.… Expand
  51. A510ka
    Jul 27, 2020
    6
    I put a lot of hours into this game and I am really questioning why I played it so much. There were a lot of interesting things they did with it but overall its got flaws and years later there are still a lot of bugs there shouldn't be. A lot of the stories were so boring I didn't even finish them, I played the multiple for the most part and while some of the game modes were fun it didn'tI put a lot of hours into this game and I am really questioning why I played it so much. There were a lot of interesting things they did with it but overall its got flaws and years later there are still a lot of bugs there shouldn't be. A lot of the stories were so boring I didn't even finish them, I played the multiple for the most part and while some of the game modes were fun it didn't feel like a WW2 game.… Expand
  52. besterk
    Jul 13, 2020
    6
    BF V couldn't give me anything different from the BF 1. Also BF 1 is better than BF V.
  53. Gdstas
    Jul 6, 2020
    5
    Игра скучная, мультиплейер говно, а сюжет бл* да это просто ужас. Но 5 за стрельбу она крутая!!
  54. Mr1
    Jul 1, 2020
    5
    Часто ловил баги, загдядывал сквозь текстуры. Во многом физика бесит и в сюжетке раздражают игровые условности которыхможно точно избежать
  55. Armin4
    Jun 27, 2020
    5
    Story mode is bad
    Graphics of bf1 was better
    Have a tone of bugs
    Multiplayer is terrible
  56. andrejS_de
    Jun 21, 2020
    6
    I really dont know what i can say, i was really hyped and after release i was dissapointed, because so many female soldiers on the Battlefield, Gas Mask fetish and no content. Graphics are great but no more. Really sad.
  57. MissFlora
    Jun 20, 2020
    6
    I love the mechanics and the aminations. I like the fast-pace movement. And the gun play can be intense. Overall, the game is unbalanced right now.
  58. SaltyLodestar
    May 17, 2020
    5
    Review will be centered around the multiplayer. It's battlefield, what do you expect.

    As of 2020 after they announced EA is dropping support of the game. All save one piece of content is out. Most battlefields tend save Hardline show you what you're in for by the first few days if not hours, of playing in the game. Which so far, seems to be the case for BFV. It is a very stressful    Review will be centered around the multiplayer. It's battlefield, what do you expect.

    As of 2020 after they announced EA is dropping support of the game.
    All save one piece of content is out.

    Most battlefields tend save Hardline show you what you're in for by the first few days if not hours, of playing in the game. Which so far, seems to be the case for BFV. It is a very stressful and overall extremely unsatisfying experience further marred by shotty progression and TONS of micro-transactions. However, it does have some positive gameplay additions and mechanics, but unfortunately all the good things this game has are in the single digits, while all the negatives are in the double digits.

    One thing of note but not worth its own mention is the game isn't as buggy in the current state as Hardline and BF1 were by the end of their lives. And granted those games were actually pretty bad, this is less than desirable and just still be admonished as it followed the same timeline of being a buggy mess at launch.

    Pros:

    Crouch sprinting:
    This was so minor and sometimes, and sometimes so fluid that I didn't realize I was crouch sprinting instead of normal sprinting. It has a very slight movement speed decrease, but this was an amazing addition that is very well appreciated and I do hope it returns in future games.

    Gameplay reticle customization:
    Amidst the tons of debris, extremely bright environments, dust, and lens flare the option to change the color of all your indicators is something that can not be understated and should also return future installments.

    Immersion:
    For once in a battlefield game, you can be immersed for the most part as soldiers react to their states and have call outs and such, and actually have personality in their voices which makes the game itself a much more enjoyable experience.

    And that's it. The rest the game does well, was just improving systems the last game did first. Therefore it isn't worth a mention here.

    Cons: Too damn many.

    Hit Marker ping:
    This game's pings are EXTREMELY misleading. It gives such a heavy sound for a hit that could do only 10 HP which gives a false impression that you're doing heavy damage and thus for players who rely on sound and counting the amount of pings so you can quickly switch to the next target, it'll get you killed because you did FAR less damage than you think you are.

    Guns:
    The guns themselves feel all sorts of stupid. The assault class able to snipe, the snipers able to play the role of assault with weapons that for all intents and purposes should not be used that way is ridiculous. Even worse since some snipers have an absurd rate of fire that one would be forgiven for thinking it is a semi auto AR. And the fact that semi autos can fight from mid to long range is absurd given they do not suffer from damage drop off.

    Gun firepower:
    Much like the guns themselves, despite having set damage values, it never truly feels accurate. Landing a dozen headshots on someone with an SMG on their head and they still live yet two shots to the body from a semi and you're dead first? A flaw that's been present in most BF games, but still an atrocious one that needs to be ironed out.

    Gun Customization: While I'm all for liberties in the sake of fun, allow sights of all ranges to be attached to any gun on top of the overall no logic damage and range with no drop off, makes the idea of getting shot from across the map with a semi one of the most frustrating things to ever experience in a shooter and makes it one of the worst games of the genre as some guns suffer from drop off and some don't. Everything in the game is inconsistent and that's frustrating beyond belief.

    Women:
    I support representation to any group so long as it doesn't conflict with the game itself.
    But this is something I simply cannot overlook because of the setting, and the fact of how jarring and immersion breaking it is.

    Hearing men's cries as they die left and right is immersive to what wars could be like, but when you know that women were NOT front-line fighters, and their voices are yelling and shouting alongside the men completely shatters any immersion the game could give you to the WW2 setting because it's inaccurate and serves no purpose other than pandering. And the bad kind too.

    Alongside that, their models are odd. As they are well, women, their models are more slender and frankly much more lowkey, where you can shoot a man around a pillar because he's buff, you cannot to a woman as she is 100% concealed even though they share the same stances, it messes with gameplay in a way that is very noticeable and is rather annoying. Ignoring the blatant disregard of historical accuracy, with their already gameplay liberties.

    Conclusion: Overall, BFV is a very weak game. Which disregards its setting, and then panders to a demographic that ends up pissing off its fans. One of the worst shooters made to date with nothing exceptional to its name.    … Expand
  59. Menni
    Apr 27, 2020
    7
    A mio parere grandi passi indietro rispetto a quanto visto nel capolavoro di Battlefield 1 in particolare riguardo la campagna in singolo, trovata meno interessante e longeva rispetto a quelle dei capitoli precedenti. Grave per quanto mi riguarda l'mpossibilità di segnalare i nemici
  60. iGamezRo
    Apr 17, 2020
    5
    I've played this game on PS4 Slim. The Graphics are good but I don't like the game because in the console version the aim assist is aiming only at 1cm distance, the enemy always knows were you are but dose not have the rights to shoot you if he dose not see you directly. An enemy can take up to 5-6 bullets until they die, you die at 1hp not at 0 and the enemy is overpowered in general, ifI've played this game on PS4 Slim. The Graphics are good but I don't like the game because in the console version the aim assist is aiming only at 1cm distance, the enemy always knows were you are but dose not have the rights to shoot you if he dose not see you directly. An enemy can take up to 5-6 bullets until they die, you die at 1hp not at 0 and the enemy is overpowered in general, if I play a games camping on easy (how I in 100% of the cases do) I expect for the enemy to be a poorly scripted naive AI that you can beat only by clapping. I play a game just for its story not complexity and real-life characteristics and realistic enemies. Maybe some players like it that way but make that for the realistic difficulty, on easy make the AI that poorly scripted naive thing because some players will not like your game that way. I could play only one mission before I rage quited and uninstalled the game because I was enemies laughing stock not they to they to me. If you are a casual player don't buy this game, but if you wanna try it get EA Access and try it that way because it's a lot cheaper and you also get a ton of another games like BF1 which is how I want, for casual gaimg experiences.… Expand
  61. Zalabar22
    Mar 24, 2020
    6
    I've been one of the few that stuck with the game since launch. DICE has had its ups and downs with the game but I still enjoy it overall. The recent content has really shown that they were dedicated to the game from the beginning, and while it's had some hiccups along the way I still think it's a solid FPS. Give it a go if it interests you.
  62. SFin
    Feb 9, 2020
    7
    I first met the Battlefield universe. The graphics are one of the best, but I did not see any more advantages. the plot is mediocre, very tolerant and terrible physics. But somehow this game still got me hooked.
  63. Shaposparta
    Jan 23, 2020
    6
    Le doy un 6 por generoso pero la campaña es una mierda ademas corta y es todo sigilo
  64. Twisted_Reality
    Dec 10, 2019
    5
    Although I have to admit that there is a huge setp back from previous years gone by though still enjoyable ifa tad short
  65. Dixoncc
    Dec 8, 2019
    5
    This is just bad, what were they thinking wander off from history like that?
    Its a PC mess where they just had to have a gender and race perspective in everything, so much that it totally hurts the experience.
    No, this won't do it, take a look at Infinity Ward and CoD MW Dice and see how it's done, because this was embarrasing
  66. Explosivo14
    Nov 24, 2019
    7
    Es un juego que a mi parecer promete mucho. Me gusta mucho la historia de la humanidad, sus errores, sus hechos históricos, todo en general. Al transcurrir en la segunda guerra mundial, la guerra más sanguinaria, más cruda y terrible. Uno no se siente del todo como si fuera un soldado más. Le hace falta más crueldad. Su online en ovaciones se siente vacío al tener falta de contenido seEs un juego que a mi parecer promete mucho. Me gusta mucho la historia de la humanidad, sus errores, sus hechos históricos, todo en general. Al transcurrir en la segunda guerra mundial, la guerra más sanguinaria, más cruda y terrible. Uno no se siente del todo como si fuera un soldado más. Le hace falta más crueldad. Su online en ovaciones se siente vacío al tener falta de contenido se siente muy repetitivo y vacío. Su modo de un jugador, historias de guerra., tiene muy buena narrativa y cuenta hechos que te podrían poner a reflexionar. Pero la IA es algo estúpida. Con el nuevo DLC guerra en el Pacífico muchas cosas han cambiado. Después de que exploté sus dos nuevos mapas llegué a la conclusión que el juego aún puede dar más hacia delante. Es un DLC que me hizo pensar lo que tuvieron que vivir los japoneses y estadounidenses en esa época. Pero retomando los otros mapas uno se da cuenta que son muuuy flojos on online flojo que no se compara con los de sus antecesores, un online repetitivo que podría ser compensado con un aumento de slots en los jugadores. Acerca de su banda Sonora es una maldita obra maestra sin dudarlo, le da un toque genial al juego así que un punto a favor para este juego que se que algún día dará lo que prometió. En conclusión battlefield debe cambiar su rutina en diferentes aspectos. Es un juego que le he dedicado horas y horas, no me desepcionen y por favor no dejen morir al juego.… Expand
  67. matteume
    Nov 17, 2018
    5
    Didn't like the new gunplay in BF1 and this feels the same. I enjoyed this game for some time but it was just like every other game published by EA... Not finished when it arrived.
  68. Memfis
    Nov 7, 2019
    6
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Будь готов к целой армии кемперов, у которых ты будешь сосать всю игру, и Самая худшая система респавна во всей серии Battlefield!
    И кроме дикого феминизма и отсутствия советских войск- это тот же хороший Battlefield в стилистике второй мировой    … Expand
  69. Widowmakernt
    Oct 25, 2019
    6
    This more of an update to the previous Review based on what they've shown of the Pacific DLC. Sadly...still the same goofy trailers and artwork. I'm really not sure what happened to to the DICE art department, when anything that's not a scanned object/texture from real life is incredibly poor by comparison to previous titles. There are obvious omissions of outlandish uniforms, but one canThis more of an update to the previous Review based on what they've shown of the Pacific DLC. Sadly...still the same goofy trailers and artwork. I'm really not sure what happened to to the DICE art department, when anything that's not a scanned object/texture from real life is incredibly poor by comparison to previous titles. There are obvious omissions of outlandish uniforms, but one can be assured they'll be there as normal and DICE paying Jack Frags read(badly) scripted lines about having a flamethrower battle pick up is something exciting we've not seen before ain't cutting the mustard. I mean after all this time...the DLC is only 3 Maps...not the 4 or 6 we got in the French/Russian DLC. Also...paying these youtubers to write a life story about how difficult it is to build and animate assets...don't mean squat to a customer. I pay for a product, not excuses or ''boo hoo me'' stories to make me feel bad about not liking a mediocre product I was sold and constant broken promises from Devs… Expand
  70. adpol95
    Oct 7, 2019
    5
    Just next BF... Very boring... gorgeous graphics but that’s it... Nothing NEW.... just next episode
  71. mega13d
    Sep 29, 2019
    7
    Good graphics and destructible objects. Firestorm addition was a game changer. But the bugs and the connections to servers spoil the party.
  72. whatever_mp
    Sep 10, 2019
    5
    If you don't care about politics stuff. Game is still bad because its randomness, bugs and visibility problems. All mechanics in the game awards not so fun gameplay.
  73. BubaMan
    Aug 29, 2019
    5
    BFV is a distinctly average game.
    It plays a lot more like CoD these days, favouring smaller game modes, where fastest finger wins and there's no room for strategic play. They even reduced the squad size to 4 so you can't play as well together either.
    The content at launch was very small and the content since then has been slow to come and unimpressive - mostly additional small game    BFV is a distinctly average game.
    It plays a lot more like CoD these days, favouring smaller game modes, where fastest finger wins and there's no room for strategic play. They even reduced the squad size to 4 so you can't play as well together either.
    The content at launch was very small and the content since then has been slow to come and unimpressive - mostly additional small game modes, Fortnight mode (Firestorm) and finally 1 extra (badly designed) map.

    The game is graphically impressive, the soundtrack is good and the single player campaign is ok so it's not all bad... it's just not what a Battlefield game should be.    … Expand
  74. Carrick
    Jul 23, 2019
    5
    If you can get past the suckiness of some aspects of the game, the multiplayer game modes are pretty solid.
  75. MegaPlayboy
    Jul 16, 2019
    6
    Un gran paso para atras de la franquicia que se encuentra mal optimizado, con constantes cuelgues graficos, no cargan texturas, micro transacciones abusivas, un modo firestorm que brilla por su abandono y sus tiempos de espera sobre 4 minutos en solitario. Y lo peor es la nula sensación de inmersión que otorga el juego, se supone que estamos en la 2 guerra. Lo único positivo fue queUn gran paso para atras de la franquicia que se encuentra mal optimizado, con constantes cuelgues graficos, no cargan texturas, micro transacciones abusivas, un modo firestorm que brilla por su abandono y sus tiempos de espera sobre 4 minutos en solitario. Y lo peor es la nula sensación de inmersión que otorga el juego, se supone que estamos en la 2 guerra. Lo único positivo fue que gracias a este juego revivieron los servidores de BF IV y BF I...… Expand
  76. JPK
    Jul 8, 2019
    5
    I Don’t Hate It Because Of The Obvious Reason
    The main problem I have with this game is actually it’s historical inaccuracies.
  77. SuomiSoldat
    Jul 8, 2019
    7
    After playing the game some 20 or so hours, I actually like it. The game play is nice. But I'm amazed at the perf issues (huge fps drops here and there). Like how can it be? It is not like the hardware came as a surprise. I play with ps 4 pro on full HD, should be able to run without these issues.

    Also another thing is that the game is still missing huge amount of content. Current maps    After playing the game some 20 or so hours, I actually like it. The game play is nice. But I'm amazed at the perf issues (huge fps drops here and there). Like how can it be? It is not like the hardware came as a surprise. I play with ps 4 pro on full HD, should be able to run without these issues.

    Also another thing is that the game is still missing huge amount of content. Current maps are good in my opinion, but they are getting dull as it feels like there are 5 of them    … Expand
  78. Heytheresmjo06
    Jul 2, 2019
    7
    This game is OK. I spent a while on it and had a genuinely a good time. I got a few kills, died a few times, trolled a teeny bit. I enjoyed it. BUT. I am not 6 months into playing and I have already found some game breaking glitches. I will sometimes spawn in and my weapons will not load within a few minutes, meaning i have to sit in a corner hoping I don't get spotted until my weapons do,This game is OK. I spent a while on it and had a genuinely a good time. I got a few kills, died a few times, trolled a teeny bit. I enjoyed it. BUT. I am not 6 months into playing and I have already found some game breaking glitches. I will sometimes spawn in and my weapons will not load within a few minutes, meaning i have to sit in a corner hoping I don't get spotted until my weapons do, though I am often killed before they do. I play on console with a rough frame rate shat SHOULD be around 60 frames with small breaks every now and then; what I do not like is that sometimes my game will sometimes run at 15 frames and sometimes even crash.

    Fix it DICE. Don't ruin such a fun game with crappy bugs and unplayble frame rates.    … Expand
  79. Endaptiande_YT
    Jun 16, 2019
    6
    Игра и вправду через чур толерантна. Это не правильно с точки зрения Второй Мировой Войны. Геймдизайн очень схож с бф1 и могу сказать, что это больше рескин. Да, в игре прекрасное оружие. Отдача, звук на высшем уровне, но играть в это НЕ ИНТЕРЕСНО. Максимум несколько месяцев или даже недель можно поиграть, потом устаешь от однотипных карт и никакущей поддержки игры от DICE. Battlefield VИгра и вправду через чур толерантна. Это не правильно с точки зрения Второй Мировой Войны. Геймдизайн очень схож с бф1 и могу сказать, что это больше рескин. Да, в игре прекрасное оружие. Отдача, звук на высшем уровне, но играть в это НЕ ИНТЕРЕСНО. Максимум несколько месяцев или даже недель можно поиграть, потом устаешь от однотипных карт и никакущей поддержки игры от DICE. Battlefield V должна была быть в недалёком будущем, А не во второй Мирой.… Expand
  80. JordyB
    May 20, 2019
    7
    I didn't like this game at launch because of all the bugs and lack of content, but recently I gave it another try when Firestorm launched and if've been playing BFV since. I love the gunplay in this game it's just so satisfying. Despite the enjoyment I'm getting there are still a lot of issues that I hope will be resolved soon.
  81. XStarr_Lordx
    May 7, 2019
    7
    The game's campaign is lackluster and boring. The multiplayer experience is very fun but some of the map design for certain maps make those maps boring and not fun to play. There are a few maps that I like to play and always com pack to. I feel like the women representation doesn't belong in the game. There are a lot of glitches. Overall I only like the multiplayer experience.
  82. Noobik12316
    Apr 18, 2019
    5
    This is quite good game - excellent shooting and amazing music, BUT what the f*ck are women on the field of World War II?? I hate this tolerance where it is frankly not needed. Do not misunderstand me, I am not a racist, but this is disrespect for war veterans
  83. Berrlett
    Mar 29, 2019
    6
    EA might have screwed up this one but for someone like me who is primarily into off-line single player campaign well at they considered that mode for this game and am going through it right now and I can't say I don't like what I have played. BUT because this game's main judgement is over the online multiplayer I'll just trust what I have read so far and put the score at no higher than 6.EA might have screwed up this one but for someone like me who is primarily into off-line single player campaign well at they considered that mode for this game and am going through it right now and I can't say I don't like what I have played. BUT because this game's main judgement is over the online multiplayer I'll just trust what I have read so far and put the score at no higher than 6. Got it for 65% off and liking the story so far.… Expand
  84. Fairbottom
    Mar 18, 2019
    7
    The WSJ's have done it to us again. Where is the fidelity to historical truths? My grandfather fought in Rotterdam. He was killed his first spawn by a lucky German assault trooper (due to lag, total bs!). His second time he was killed by a nade (due to glitching, whatever!). But his third spawn? He made it to the objective and spawn camped all those Germans until they rage-quit. And that'sThe WSJ's have done it to us again. Where is the fidelity to historical truths? My grandfather fought in Rotterdam. He was killed his first spawn by a lucky German assault trooper (due to lag, total bs!). His second time he was killed by a nade (due to glitching, whatever!). But his third spawn? He made it to the objective and spawn camped all those Germans until they rage-quit. And that's how Rotterdam was captured and the war was won. And do you know what my grandfather—decorated thrice times for exceptional K/D ratios, and one of the few to have platinumed the war—didn't see while bravely enduring that hellish nightmare? Women in front-line positions.

    If you can overlook the terrible sacrilege the game is fun to play, though.    … Expand
  85. LiteralLlama
    Mar 13, 2019
    5
    Battlefield 5 - It's not bad, but there is definitely a lot holding the game back.

    Before saying anything, I just want to make a note of the controversies. EA is awful, but BFV is not EA and should be judged as itself. If you learned history from playing Assassin's Creed and expect to learn WWII history here, that's not gonna happen. There are no black Nazis in the game. The game    Battlefield 5 - It's not bad, but there is definitely a lot holding the game back.

    Before saying anything, I just want to make a note of the controversies.
    EA is awful, but BFV is not EA and should be judged as itself.
    If you learned history from playing Assassin's Creed and expect to learn WWII history here, that's not gonna happen.
    There are no black Nazis in the game.

    The game play is fun and I think a solid step up from BF1 but not at it's greatest. Random deaths from indirect fighting is taken down a lot and spotting is changed to make paying attention more crucial. Weapon balance is still a problem among guns but the gap among guns are not so bad that you'll only see one gun throughout the game. An attrition mechanic was added and you'll find yourself dying to running out of ammo or not being able to heal if you're not careful. It's makes it very punishing if you are lacking specific classes in your group. Very specific play styles restrain the classes to play a very particular way. Little tactical advantages classes offer through their gadgets are now demanded. It's a weird direction BF decided to take. Some like it, others hate it. I think it damaged the game a little.

    The game is not stable. There are a lot of bugs that will make you have to restart the game. Bugs get fixed, but then another springs up from the corner. It will piss you off. You will have to put up with game breaking **** It hurt the game a lot.

    The BFV atmosphere and environment is pretty good. A lot of people worried that it was going to be a downgrade like the wackiness of Advanced Warfare in the COD series. This game still feels like BF. It's not as subtle, but it still holds the "war and just war" theme. No mic screaming shenanigans. You get a close kill, and worry about the other things going on. It looks very similar to BF1. There is probably just a small step up, but I think we're getting close to the pinnacle of what things will be looking like.

    The amount of content you get may not feel much. I purchased the game on sale for 20 dollars and I say it was worth 20 bucks, maybe 30 but not anymore. There is only the British and German army but a decent amount of maps. There are good weapon varieties, definitely more than BF1. There is no premium pass (yet) so thanks for that. There is a seasonal Tide of Wars that add more weapons and outfits, but no new map of yet. There are a lot of things you can customize about your gun and people. It adds to the progression of things which works well. I feel sure that they'll continue adding stuff, for how long I do not know. You'll get your money worth for 20 bucks, that's for sure.

    Don't play the single player.

    All in all, it's an okay game. There is a lot of bugs, content is lacking, and the balance is kind of irritating. But it's fun. I wouldn't recommend it completely, but if you're curious about it, you will have some fun.    … Expand
  86. Bitek
    Feb 26, 2019
    6
    The game does not deserve all the bad publicity and hate. intense it has intense multiplayer game play good variety of modes and maps and improved graphics over BF1. however the game feels like another improvement over previous BF game. it does not really bring anything new that we have not seen before. single player is interesting but not ground breaking. the game is all about multiplayerThe game does not deserve all the bad publicity and hate. intense it has intense multiplayer game play good variety of modes and maps and improved graphics over BF1. however the game feels like another improvement over previous BF game. it does not really bring anything new that we have not seen before. single player is interesting but not ground breaking. the game is all about multiplayer and single player feels like an add-on just to be there.… Expand
  87. HugeyBear
    Feb 15, 2019
    5
    I think that BF4 was the last time I really enjoyed the franchise. BF3 and Bad Company were wonderful games but this just doesn't feel like battlefield anymore. It seems like they forgot what made them so successful. The choice to set it in ww2 was a mistake in my opinion. If you play solo without a team all communicating then you are unable to compete. If you are on the losing team, itI think that BF4 was the last time I really enjoyed the franchise. BF3 and Bad Company were wonderful games but this just doesn't feel like battlefield anymore. It seems like they forgot what made them so successful. The choice to set it in ww2 was a mistake in my opinion. If you play solo without a team all communicating then you are unable to compete. If you are on the losing team, it gets frustrating quickly and becomes a war of attrition to get through. The maps are uninspiring, the weapons similarly. I played it for a few days and then stopped and haven't gone back nor wanted to.… Expand
  88. DragonArmy12
    Feb 8, 2019
    6
    Could it have been done better? Yes. There could have been more factions and content at the start, but I believe the fan base would've been salty either way. The graphic and engine improvements are spectactular and combat is stellar (with a few minor issues). The game scratches two itches: playing a world war 2 game and playing in a squad. It's worth $30 now, and battle royale comes out inCould it have been done better? Yes. There could have been more factions and content at the start, but I believe the fan base would've been salty either way. The graphic and engine improvements are spectactular and combat is stellar (with a few minor issues). The game scratches two itches: playing a world war 2 game and playing in a squad. It's worth $30 now, and battle royale comes out in 30 days. Definitely worth a pick up if you have 2-3 friends to squad with.… Expand
  89. Voxman
    Jan 23, 2019
    6
    The game is incredibly boring and controversial.
    The problem is both in the game itself and in the completely bestial attitude of developers and publishers to the players (which became known due to several leaks in reddit and official tweets).
    1) HUD blocks visibility. Due to player marks or points, the enemy may not be visible. 2) Contrast "eats away" eyes on some maps. In the    The game is incredibly boring and controversial.
    The problem is both in the game itself and in the completely bestial attitude of developers and publishers to the players (which became known due to several leaks in reddit and official tweets).
    1) HUD blocks visibility. Due to player marks or points, the enemy may not be visible.
    2) Contrast "eats away" eyes on some maps. In the buildings it is impossible to discern opponents. Light and dark swings are too strong.
    3) At the same time, the enemies are not marked in a normal way, and the scouts do not use signal flares!
    4) There are no enemies on the global map and you will easily be shot in the back by joining a squad after death.
    Bottom line: hardcore detection mechanics (which does not work due to the fact that teamwork does not work fully) complicates the visual component and the poor HUD.
    At the same time they kill you too quickly. Shooting here is good, but it's almost the only thing that works great in this game.
    Therefore, a significant part of the game has to wait - which kills the dynamics. Either you are sitting in the dark corner of the room, or get shot in the back and wait for the medic.
    Very cool and dynamic. Who, under such conditions, will desperately attack points? This mechanic does not create tension, it creates boredom.

    In CoD BO4, enemies can also quickly kill you (not in the royal battle, where the TTC is higher, but in the usual multiplayer game).
    But you sleep fast. Yes, and you can be treated freely. HERE, you are deprived of a full recovery of health points, you often will not have a first-aid kit and cartridges. How does this affect the dynamics? Streyfitsya here also fails to fully, because you constantly come across a stone or other obstacle.

    This is not all - there are still many bugs here. My customization character of the support character is already flying for the fifth time. And the front line mode is currently broken.

    But the worst thing that has been done is a spoiled Operation mode, which in BF1 was very good. There is no global map, which gave everything visibility, scale and integrity. The games themselves are tight and can’t shut up prematurely.

    In BF1 it was possible to win on the first day, there was progress and a connection between the days of the operation. Here this bond has weakened. And there are no Giants.
    Oh, this game has become a big disappointment for me. There are still many negative points that can be mentioned, but I got tired of writing it.

    From the positive, of course, the already mentioned shooting, visually the game looks good (although there are problems with contrast and HUD), the mechanics with crushing grass and the construction of barricades are good. The technique is implemented, as for me, normal. The limit on the number of projectiles for technology is fully justified. The mechanics of a squad leader also makes the game better.

    The game could turn out good if it was developed longer and if it was developed by people who understand games.    … Expand
  90. Skibz
    Jan 21, 2019
    6
    Battlefield V is a solid game. It tries something new by introducing the attrition system whereby ammo is short supply and health doesn’t regenerate on it’s own. It takes a little bit of playing to get used to it and is an ok change. Squad play doesn’t really have any gameplay impact, just like other battlefield games being in a party helps with fallouts on enemy positions and revives inBattlefield V is a solid game. It tries something new by introducing the attrition system whereby ammo is short supply and health doesn’t regenerate on it’s own. It takes a little bit of playing to get used to it and is an ok change. Squad play doesn’t really have any gameplay impact, just like other battlefield games being in a party helps with fallouts on enemy positions and revives in my experience with the game.

    Now the elephant in the room, social justice politics in it, speaking for the multiplayer aspect (haven’t played the single player and don’t plan to) once you are in playing a match you are not bombarded with social justice messaging, you are just playing the game. With all the issues this game has people who it seems haven’t even played the game are focusing too much on the skin colour and gender of soldiers you can pick from. I understand that people are a little fed up with social justice agendas that are forced upon us in the entertainment industry, speak with your wallet don’t buy it, that is how you will effect change, but don’t add to the unnecessary hate this game has gotten by trying to limit someone else’s fun with it just because you don’t agree with the politics of the developers.    … Expand
  91. Beauner
    Jan 17, 2019
    5
    The game is pretty fun if you have a full squad of 4 people all working together.. Otherwise, it is probably the worst battlefield game outside of Hardline. Instant deaths from every direction.. You're hardly ever fighting the person who kills you. Camping is on a Call of Duty level. Enemy visibility might as well be zero.. Everybody blends into everything resulting you dying to somebodyThe game is pretty fun if you have a full squad of 4 people all working together.. Otherwise, it is probably the worst battlefield game outside of Hardline. Instant deaths from every direction.. You're hardly ever fighting the person who kills you. Camping is on a Call of Duty level. Enemy visibility might as well be zero.. Everybody blends into everything resulting you dying to somebody you didn't even know was there. It just lacks so much in the skill department.. There might be some new players who like it because they can succeed because they can camp or shoot people in the back constantly, but people looking for a skillful shooter will be disappointed. 5/10. I had fun for a little bit.. when I had a full squad we had several good nights of battlefield.. otherwise it's complete trash.… Expand
  92. BlackRilar
    Jan 13, 2019
    7
    Сама игра получилась не плохой. В плане графики и стрельбы все шикарно! Все как обычно на уровне! Но вот с толерантностью переборщили...
  93. DaniDarko
    Jan 11, 2019
    6
    I did rise my score for this game from 2 to 6 after I spent about 40 hours in it. Yes it looks like game is not complete but there are some nice features that I would like to see in future games. I'm about resurrection, hiding killer position, barrel replacement animation for MG's, building covers and ease plane control. I believe that EA will make right conclusion about this and BF 6I did rise my score for this game from 2 to 6 after I spent about 40 hours in it. Yes it looks like game is not complete but there are some nice features that I would like to see in future games. I'm about resurrection, hiding killer position, barrel replacement animation for MG's, building covers and ease plane control. I believe that EA will make right conclusion about this and BF 6 will be the best :)… Expand
  94. s1bryant019
    Jan 10, 2019
    5
    I am not quite sure where all this hate for the game is coming from players. There seems to be a hangup on historical inaccuracies which one finds incredibly hypocritical as the series has not been known for this in quite some time. The single player campaign is overall lackluster with a few memorable scenes and characters. Regarding the multiplayer though it is what you come to love andI am not quite sure where all this hate for the game is coming from players. There seems to be a hangup on historical inaccuracies which one finds incredibly hypocritical as the series has not been known for this in quite some time. The single player campaign is overall lackluster with a few memorable scenes and characters. Regarding the multiplayer though it is what you come to love and crave out of a Battlefield game.

    EDIT: Since playing this game for close to 40 hrs I have to confirm many of the other complaints and dropped my review from a 7 to a 5. The multiplayer maps are very limiting, and some are just plain bad. There are certain maps where the snow and dynamic lighting make it so you cannot even read the HUD on screen. Additionally, the class selection and weaponry is incredibly limited. I usually main a medic which I have reached level 20 in, and the fact that the only weapons I can select are SMGs with varying degrees of fire rate are incredibly disappointing. Sure I can slap on an ugly camo, but that is not enough regarding variety. Also, I am running into some significant bugs with actually reviving people, which is the same button as picking up their gear. Numerous time you pick up their weapon, they die, and cannot locate the original loadout to be gunned down in the process.    … Expand
  95. Mistwalker_94
    Jan 8, 2019
    7
    I can tell be reading the negative reveiws that alot of them are writen by people who haven't played the game because they accuse the game of things that aren't true, example someone complained about black nazis, there aren't black nazis in the game. Some people straight up say that they haven't played the game but they are still here giving it negative reviews.
    The game isn't perfect far    I can tell be reading the negative reveiws that alot of them are writen by people who haven't played the game because they accuse the game of things that aren't true, example someone complained about black nazis, there aren't black nazis in the game. Some people straight up say that they haven't played the game but they are still here giving it negative reviews.
    The game isn't perfect far from it! In many ways it feels like it is still in beta but it is not the steaming piece of **** these people make it out to be.    … Expand
  96. moregon
    Jan 3, 2019
    7
    Not sure where all of the hate comes from with this game. I've been playing the Battlefield games for years now and while the franchise does feel like it's gotten a bit stale, it still plays reasonably well. I don't think this game looks as good as BF1 did though it does seem to play a touch better. There is a lot of free DLC coming so anyone complaining there are no Russian forces yetNot sure where all of the hate comes from with this game. I've been playing the Battlefield games for years now and while the franchise does feel like it's gotten a bit stale, it still plays reasonably well. I don't think this game looks as good as BF1 did though it does seem to play a touch better. There is a lot of free DLC coming so anyone complaining there are no Russian forces yet may want to chill out until the games cycle is complete. Yes, there are micro-transactions but they are purely cosmetic. Maybe that's the problem some people have with it? They can't sink $100 of mom and dad's money into weapons that will get them over their lack-of-skill hump. It's not World of Tanks, you have to try to succeed. I bet you anything that the people that are giving this game 0/10 are also playing it almost daily.… Expand
  97. MilesTheHawk
    Dec 31, 2018
    6
    I'm a huge fan of Battlefield series, but this was a very underwhelming and disappointing game I've ever experienced. It has bugs and laggy while playing war stories. Some of them were pretty good in my opinion, but it needs more experienced and changeable. The multiplayer is a bit slow and boring, but I enjoyed it though. I gotta be honest... Battlefield 1 is way better than this game.
  98. Zargon202
    Dec 29, 2018
    5
    A rather disappointing entry - while maybe not as bad as people claim, it's a far cry from what I expected.
  99. Camman12
    Dec 29, 2018
    7
    I don't hate the game, but I don't like it either. DICE and EA have a lot to fix if they want to compete with Black Ops 4. The multiplayer is smooth and playable which I like, but there is so much to fix like the down state that makes you wait so long to respawn, moving glitches, weapon tuning and balance, and some hit detection issues. I don't play campaigns in Battlefield games and I'mI don't hate the game, but I don't like it either. DICE and EA have a lot to fix if they want to compete with Black Ops 4. The multiplayer is smooth and playable which I like, but there is so much to fix like the down state that makes you wait so long to respawn, moving glitches, weapon tuning and balance, and some hit detection issues. I don't play campaigns in Battlefield games and I'm not planning to do it with this game with short stories and making it feel lackluster. If this game can't get fixed later on or at all, then EA just pushed this game out to make a quick cash grab, which is no surprise. Fix the game or its the worst Battlefield game right next to Hardline.… Expand
  100. theworstguy
    Dec 28, 2018
    5
    this is just a scam. I've been playing since battlefield 4 and this **** is just worse. There so many unnecessary animations ie the landing animation when you jump from a higher place which an other player can just kill you at that time. Also you just cant jump through a bloody window, i know this is a battlefield thing but this is even worse than battlefield 1. This game is justthis is just a scam. I've been playing since battlefield 4 and this **** is just worse. There so many unnecessary animations ie the landing animation when you jump from a higher place which an other player can just kill you at that time. Also you just cant jump through a bloody window, i know this is a battlefield thing but this is even worse than battlefield 1. This game is just unfinished and full with bug and EA aren't going to fix the bug. There are so many hackers as well and the report system is just trash, i couldn't believe a player want banned when almost the whole server reported him… Expand
prev
Page:

Awards & Rankings

7
#7 Most Discussed PS4 Game of 2018
39
#39 Most Shared PS4 Game of 2018

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
73

Mixed or average reviews - based on 23 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 15 out of 23
  2. Mixed: 8 out of 23
  3. Negative: 0 out of 23
  1. GameCritics
    Dec 27, 2018
    60
    In many ways, Battlefield V feels like a big step backwards for the franchise. The campaign is boring and frustrating, multiplayer is unbalanced, and bugs keep popping up in every mode to ruin the experience. The fortification system is a good shakeup, but the good it brings is tempered by the cumbersome and murky Grand Operations. With some patches, balance changes and bug squashing, BFV could be a fantastic game, but at the moment, this soldier needs to go back to basic training.
    Read full review
  2. Impulsegamer
    Dec 20, 2018
    76
    EA and DICE seem to have lost sight of what made this series a true contender for the FPS crown, and both the gameplay and the content are suffering as a result.
    Read full review
  3. Playstation Official Magazine UK
    Dec 12, 2018
    80
    Ripe with potential but riddled with problems, the new Battlefield will be brilliant six months from now. Right now, however, it’s merely a good shooter. [Issue#157, p.83]
See all critic reviews »