Battlefield V

 PlayStation 4
User Score
2.7

Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 3123 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 538 out of 3123
  2. Mixed: 363 out of 3123
  3. Negative: 2,222 out of 3123
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. Jesp1
    Dec 21, 2018
    4
    I'm not going to get into the "historical accuracy" aspect of this. Because aside from DICE's horrible defense of their product (Virtue signaling morons), I really do not have a problem with a videogame such as this having less than perfect accuracy. Because obviously gameplay is more important for a FPS. That being said... I've only played multiplayer-Single player campaigns do notI'm not going to get into the "historical accuracy" aspect of this. Because aside from DICE's horrible defense of their product (Virtue signaling morons), I really do not have a problem with a videogame such as this having less than perfect accuracy. Because obviously gameplay is more important for a FPS. That being said... I've only played multiplayer-Single player campaigns do not interest me, particularly in Battlefield games. So for multiplayer.

    Pro's
    -Looks good-I mean seriously some of the environments look great, and real dust and weather can obstruct and be used to advantage.
    -Fast paced and conquest game modes-A charge forward type mode for more combat. Conquest works like conquest does.
    -Weapons appear balanced. No obvious go to guns, though there are a handful of useless ones.
    -Armor does not necessarily dominate-more skill required for armor drivers. Fairly easy to balance the playing field against them.

    Con's
    -Cant freakin' see anyone! While weathering is a cool aspect and the terrain looks great it has the unfortunate side effect of everyone being essentially stealthed. Which can be insanely frustrating.
    -Conquest seems particularly boring?! First time I've felt truly bored by conquest mode. Feels either empty, or chaotic... Not in between.
    -Level up system is meh-I liked attachments better. Its not the worst, but definitely not the best.
    -Cosmetics are also meh-I mean with the lack of reality just go crazy! Lets get some steampunk demons going since we already have black trans Nazi's!
    -air warfare seems detached from the rest of the fight, aside from overpowered bombers! Good luck taking any planes down with flak...
    -#1 no freakin' girls are playing this!!!! Why go through the trouble to market to them when 1% of your audience might be female?! LOL DICE. But whatever...

    Ultimately a disappointment. But not as bad as the Battlefront fiasco. Definitely not going out to buy the next DICE game without real reviews and a markdown. Seriously couldn't care less about the adding female/racial skins to the game, but the response from DICE was more infuriating than the decision. Its a meh game at the moment, worth a markdown buy at least.

    ***Revised score*** Many improvements had recently been made that should have been in release such as TTK, etc. They are also working on some visualization issues (not seeing people as easily). So ultimately some of the flaws no longer exist and I have rated it as an 8 instead.

    ***Revised again*** Fixed game then broke game. DICE is clueless as to balance. Pathetic right now, avoid!!!! Sniper hell.    … Expand
  2. GamergodsFail
    Dec 31, 2018
    4
    There's a big problem with Battlefield V, and it's not because you can't have fun with the multiplayer. It's because of the sheer lack of content. I also need to bring up the lack of innovation. It just feels more like an expansion rather than it's own game, and a very watered down one at that. On a side note, it also offers the worst, shortest and buggiest singleplayer campaign to date.
  3. RB500
    Nov 24, 2018
    4
    Battlefield V feels unfinished. You can see the intended target, the landscape can be gorgeous - but so many areas the gameplay fails to hit the mark, it wants to be COD, but plays like a game off a PS2. The interface and layout is basically a poorer re-skin of Battlefield 1. The dumbing down of the number of weapons in multiplayer and the customizations themselves is frustrating andBattlefield V feels unfinished. You can see the intended target, the landscape can be gorgeous - but so many areas the gameplay fails to hit the mark, it wants to be COD, but plays like a game off a PS2. The interface and layout is basically a poorer re-skin of Battlefield 1. The dumbing down of the number of weapons in multiplayer and the customizations themselves is frustrating and betrays the franchise we know and love.

    I wanted this to be excellent, in a period of history I've wanted next gen graphics. Yes, we had the 'world war 2' is overkill for the past 10 years. We finally came back around for a better new generation version and it falls short here.

    Gameplay and bugs aside, my greater disappointment is the attention to detail, in main the historical inaccuracies and the dumbing down of the uniforms. Look at any historic footage and see the British / Ally units (except for the US) and their webbing and its absence here - all Allies are basically US Army / Marine fatigue webbing belts and canteens.

    The game feels like a cynical FU to the base that complained at original reveal; with a rushed reworking to save itself. This could have been so much more - look at Rockstar and see how quality matters versus target dates.

    So disappointed, I regret the purchase at this point. Post Scriptum here I come...    … Expand
  4. Lewis-Angelo
    Mar 1, 2021
    4
    lo mejor es, sin duda, la banda sonora

    la jugabilidad ha empeorado, va fatal apuntar, usar armas apostadas, o cualquier cosa que tenga que ver con la interacción con el escenario ¿los rifles en la segunda guerra mundial no tenían caída de bala?, ¿los muros eran de adamantium? es triste ver los pasos atrás de una saga que aportaba muchísimo más en 2008 que ahora en la campaña ponen    lo mejor es, sin duda, la banda sonora

    la jugabilidad ha empeorado, va fatal apuntar, usar armas apostadas, o cualquier cosa que tenga que ver con la interacción con el escenario
    ¿los rifles en la segunda guerra mundial no tenían caída de bala?, ¿los muros eran de adamantium?
    es triste ver los pasos atrás de una saga que aportaba muchísimo más en 2008 que ahora

    en la campaña ponen mapas enormes que piden a gritos cooperativo, con una IA retrasada que no falla ni una bala

    está muy bien que quieran contar historias no tan trilladas, pero hacer un juego de WWII y que no aparezcan ni rusos ni americanos...
    un par de ingleses en Egipto, una chica en Noruega, y unos senegaleses en Francia (la mejor), pues no es forma de hacer un juego de la WWII

    El último Tiger está ahí escondida, muy corta, sin trofeos siquiera...

    ya les pasó en Battefield 1 que se pasaron de listos olvidándose de los frentes más importantes
    pero es que en BFV no hay ni nazis

    para próximas entregas tienen que trabajar muchísimo en el motor gráfico y en la jugabilidad
    un estudio en muy baja forma desde BF3    … Expand
  5. mikepatyaev
    Sep 2, 2019
    4
    Enter mankind's greatest conflict with Battlefield 5 as the series goes back to its roots with a never-before-seen portrayal of World War 2
  6. Lowzone
    Jan 16, 2019
    4
    Overrall I was really disapointed with Battlefield V...
    I think the list of pros and cons will speak for itself. (See the list under)
    I won't comment on the multiplayer side since I haven't play enough. I played on a ps4 pro Pros : -Visual is stunning(PS4 Pro) -Liked the acting and the fact that everything is native language -Shooting feels great -Audio 5.1 was immersive and well    Overrall I was really disapointed with Battlefield V...
    I think the list of pros and cons will speak for itself. (See the list under)
    I won't comment on the multiplayer side since I haven't play enough.
    I played on a ps4 pro

    Pros :
    -Visual is stunning(PS4 Pro)
    -Liked the acting and the fact that everything is native language
    -Shooting feels great
    -Audio 5.1 was immersive and well mixed
    -I liked the fact that it's a WWII game that doesn't focus on USSR and USA

    Cons:
    -Nav Mesh issues all around the single player campaign. Ennemies flying over fences and cover
    -When you're about to leave the combat area it's not clear (Level Art) There's a HUD taking the whole screen while you're getting shot at.
    -I've been spot through walls by the AI
    -The first three mission (didn't play the 4th one) have too much Stealth element (IMO) I want to shoot stuff!
    -Infinite loading screen after finishing the Tirailleur chapter
    -The title freezed for about 10 seconds during each cinematic
    -Shooting at invisible collisions with the sniper during the tirailleur chapter(LOTS of them)
    -The game crashed at the end of the last mission.    … Expand
  7. Caerleon
    Nov 18, 2018
    4
    Well, let's start. This isn't an evolution of series, this is a real degradation of Battlefield.
    Why is everything so badly done? Awful level design, meager weapon set, unbalanced weapon.
    Dynamics of the game, graphics, lighting, sounds, movement of characters doesn't look like a game for 60 $. All this is very similar to a free-2-play shooter. I'll start with the lighting on the maps.    Well, let's start. This isn't an evolution of series, this is a real degradation of Battlefield.
    Why is everything so badly done? Awful level design, meager weapon set, unbalanced weapon.
    Dynamics of the game, graphics, lighting, sounds, movement of characters doesn't look like a
    game for 60 $. All this is very similar to a free-2-play shooter.
    I'll start with the lighting on the maps. Dice, what is wrong with your monitors? Check the
    brightness settings. Horrible overexposure or too dark.
    What happened to destructible objects? One gets the feeling that I am throwing not a grenade,
    but some kind of firework. Tanks shoot shells or plush balls? Why they don't destroy a wall?
    Very boring starting maps, but new ones promise “later"
    Why do you make a team game? I don't want to depend on random players! Catastrophically not
    enough ammo. Team members don't want to give ammunition because of this I have to run to a
    warehouse, so as not to be an easy target. Medics are real egoists. No one will help you, no one
    will give you a first aid kit. It is because of these decisions that I feel like an inferior fighting unit
    on a battlefield. Is it possible to set up a tactical map display somewhere in the game settings? I
    don't want to lie down after a critical injury and wait for "potential help." I know that no one will
    help me.
    Is it a shooter or RPG? A lot of upgrades, perks, settings, customization, etc. that overloads an
    interface. I was an opponent of free premium, because nothing good will come of it. When
    premium was paid, we received at least some content, but now we are fed with promises that
    everything will be, but then. Don't think that customization will become easier, now you will
    grind "battle coins".
    Poor spotting system of an enemy. Now only the EXAMPLE area where an enemy was seen is
    shown. This paradise for snipers and campers who love to sit in dark rooms or behind shelters
    For me, and most of my friends, Battlefield 3 was the perfect part. Fair game without too much
    customization, without loot boxes. Will I play it? I don't think. Do I recommend buying it? Yes,
    but with 40-50% discount
    I think Battlefiled 5 will fail as Battlefront 2 Goodbye, BF 5 Goodnight, sweet prince    … Expand
  8. CoreGamer1408
    Dec 4, 2018
    4
    Really fake doctored spin on history that erases the sacrifice of the IRL heroes. With fake characters and stories that nobody gives a flying crap about. Worst yet they released half a game on launch. With the things that made the Battlefields series great not even present. What the hell is this like Call of Duty on training wheels? Half baked under cooked what they hell and they call thisReally fake doctored spin on history that erases the sacrifice of the IRL heroes. With fake characters and stories that nobody gives a flying crap about. Worst yet they released half a game on launch. With the things that made the Battlefields series great not even present. What the hell is this like Call of Duty on training wheels? Half baked under cooked what they hell and they call this Everyone's Battlefield. No wonder this trash dropped by 50% price in the first week with some of the big retailers. Can someone make Battlefield great again? Painfully average game, lacking in content with a weird rewriting of major history for social agenda reasons.… Expand
  9. danield80
    May 7, 2021
    4
    I don't know what the developers were trying to do.
    They focus on how bad and sad war is in the singleplayer, but they have women with artificial limbs in the multiplayer...? They spoon-feed you with incohesive, nonsensical SJW story-telling about how particular groups of people do not get recognition just to later say "We prefer fun over historical accuracy." ...??
    Call of Duty: WW2    I don't know what the developers were trying to do.
    They focus on how bad and sad war is in the singleplayer, but they have women with artificial limbs in the multiplayer...? They spoon-feed you with incohesive, nonsensical SJW story-telling about how particular groups of people do not get recognition just to later say "We prefer fun over historical accuracy." ...??
    Call of Duty: WW2 looks like a masterpiece compared to this.    … Expand
  10. mikect92
    Jan 14, 2019
    4
    This game has such potential. The ideas or strong, the game play good (mostly) and the graphics stunning. But the game is incomplete with whole sections locked with ' coming soon' plastered over them. The game is riddled with bugs which range from slight annoyances to game breaking. But for me, by far the worst aspect of this game is tone. I grew up with the greatest of WW2 shootersThis game has such potential. The ideas or strong, the game play good (mostly) and the graphics stunning. But the game is incomplete with whole sections locked with ' coming soon' plastered over them. The game is riddled with bugs which range from slight annoyances to game breaking. But for me, by far the worst aspect of this game is tone. I grew up with the greatest of WW2 shooters dominating my young gaming life. Medal of Honor Frontlines not only got me into serious gaming but also inspired me to take a university degree in history. Battlefield also defined online multiplayer for me and i am a huge fanboy of the series. But this game does not feel like a Battlefield game, and the claim that it is a realistic WW2 shooter is laughable. I know WW2 games and this does not feel or play like one. The whole experience has been disappointing. A short campaign and repetitive incomplete multiplayer do little to encourage me to replay this game. How did such a great franchise turn so bad? (that's a rhetorical question, the answer is EA)… Expand
  11. DULAccd
    Feb 5, 2021
    4
    I will review this game in 3 parts:Campaign,Multiplayer and Firestorm Battle Royale:

    Campaign: The campaign is very short,repetitive and a little bland.It lacks real details,like symbols on falgs and uniforms but also other things that make the world feel like and ww2 battlefield.As I was expecting,there is no historical accuracy,but that is not a must,as long as the campaign is    I will review this game in 3 parts:Campaign,Multiplayer and Firestorm Battle Royale:

    Campaign:
    The campaign is very short,repetitive and a little bland.It lacks real details,like symbols on falgs and uniforms but also other things that make the world feel like and ww2 battlefield.As I was expecting,there is no historical accuracy,but that is not a must,as long as the campaign is good,which it is not.

    Multiplayer:
    Classic paced battlefield multiplayer,very enjoyable,except for the meta weapons used by campers,which ruin my experience.

    Firestorm BR
    It is an unpolished BR game,with loys of potential,which was not shown much love by the devs.Maybe it was a mistake that it is paid and not free.It is a dead game now,or close to it,but could have been one of the greatest.    … Expand
  12. Dottore
    Nov 16, 2018
    4
    This game is as bad as it gets. It's by far the buggiest, laggiest game I've ever played. If they ever want to get a bigger player database, they should focus on fixing the bugs, game breaking or not. Anyway, in this state, it is not worth full price.
  13. Kiwaso
    Nov 17, 2018
    4
    Is Battlefield 1.5
    I miss the great variety of weapons, vehicles and personalization that Battlefield 4 brought.
  14. RepkaKepka
    Aug 23, 2021
    4
    An interesting idea, not a bad implementation, but there is very little content, the developers no longer have enthusiasm. They forgot about the USSR at all ...
  15. SER06
    Nov 19, 2018
    4
    Вы прекрасно понимаете, почему я так оценил видеоигру.
  16. NWilson
    Nov 21, 2018
    4
    Despite the sensational polarization you see here between users giving this game a 0 and giving it a 10, it is neither. In its current state, assuming 5 is an average game, it is a 4.

    It's an unfinished game with a $60 price tag. The only difference is they don’t plan on charging us for the rest of the game this time like they did with Battlefield 1. I guess that’s why they couldn’t    Despite the sensational polarization you see here between users giving this game a 0 and giving it a 10, it is neither. In its current state, assuming 5 is an average game, it is a 4.

    It's an unfinished game with a $60 price tag. The only difference is they don’t plan on charging us for the rest of the game this time like they did with Battlefield 1. I guess that’s why they couldn’t bother finishing it.

    I bought the Deluxe edition and have been playing since the 15th. My PS4 dock has BFV, BF1, and BF4 on it. They’re all I play. With that in mind, I have to be honest in that even with the flashy new graphics, this game has nothing to offer that isn’t already more polished and enjoyable in BF1 or BF4, depending on your play style preferences. The only other interesting factor - the historical context - isn’t really even truly there. I’m not going to knock the game for taking creative liberties, but it very truly does not look like WWII much of the time.

    With that in mind, the gunplay is great. There are some important gameplay changes that I’m happy to see. Ammo is a factor to be concerned about again, both for infantry and vehicles. The building system makes for interesting situations that keep the battlefield dynamic and changing.

    But the game just isn’t there. The single player campaign is still an afterthought with little depth (and there is still an entire story of the campaign which they haven’t finished yet). The music isn’t even a shadow of what it was in BF1. There are fewer multiplayer maps on release than there were in BF1 or BF4. Grand Operations is fundamentally broken, and doesn’t provide the same excitement as BF1’s operations - whether you win or lose has no effect on the “outcome” of the battle in its historical context. There are no Russians, French, Americans, Japanese, or other factions besides the British and the Germans. For the so-called “staggered release” the developers planned, there are weapons from all years of the war present, even though it’s supposed to only take place in 1940 - see, e.g., the STG44 or the MG42.

    This game had a lot of bad press, and probably rightfully so. EA and Dice handled customer backlash in an extremely poor and unprofessional manner. The beta was a mess and worried a lot of people given its proximity to the original release date. There are a lot of triggered people because it has women in it or has customizable characters. I truly could not care less. It’s a video game. I understand that WWII is still a very emotional subject for a lot of people - we had 5 KIA in my own family. But it’s a video game. We had a KIA in the First World War as well, and BF1 wasn’t a pinnacle of historical accuracy either, by almost any measure. Maybe people just love history. There are still great, historically accurate WWII games out there. I’d suggest getting into PC gaming if that’s your thing. Here, though, I’m glad people are going to be able to feel comfortable looking like themselves in a game. But for all the fancy trendsetting...

    It just doesn’t work. It was poorly marketed, poorly planned, and poorly executed. It could be a very, very great game. It just isn’t in its current state, and there is a lot of work to be done.

    If you want this game, don’t buy it yet. Give it 3-6 months.    … Expand
  17. Wolfgang1978zmc
    Nov 21, 2018
    4
    Again we have not finish game looks like beta version, maybe 50@% why we need pay for extra content should be for free
  18. cswbizzel
    Feb 16, 2019
    4
    I have 5 days of play time in this game and I am running out of reasons to carry on playing. I have tried to like it, I really have. I can look past the SJW stuff if the game is functional and fun, but it just isn't. The game is a chore to play. It seems that every update brings with it more problems, more game breaking bugs and more things the community did not want nor ever asked for.I have 5 days of play time in this game and I am running out of reasons to carry on playing. I have tried to like it, I really have. I can look past the SJW stuff if the game is functional and fun, but it just isn't. The game is a chore to play. It seems that every update brings with it more problems, more game breaking bugs and more things the community did not want nor ever asked for. Since launch, the game has suffered problems in virtually all departments, especially the sound, movement, and in-game visibility. Despite updates to address all these problems, they still persist.

    The game's lack of commercial success coupled with the loss of revenue due to the lack of a premium pass is worrisome for the future of this game and the Battlefield series as a whole. I fear because of these two reasons there will be less incentive on EA/Dice's part to see this game through to its conclusion. It already feels as though they've started to give up on it just months after release by pushing out generic updates that rarely add anything noteworthy, and in some cases even take the game back two steps.

    The maps are some of the most unremarkable I recall in the Battlefield series and they start to feel stale very quickly as a consequence. The only ones that I like are Devastation, Rotterdam and Arras. The others fall between mediocre and outright appalling.

    I reached rank 50 and unlocked pretty much everything I wanted after just 24 hours of playtime. That is not what I consider a good progression system if I ever saw one. Why not add more ranks, more skins, more costumes instead of wasting development time and budget on game modes that nobody plays or cares about, Dice? Better still, add more maps, factions and make this game feel like a WWII game, because it feels nothing of the sort at present. You hardly ever listen to what the fans want, Dice, and that's your biggest problem. The community says they want one thing and you give them the polar opposite. They want the core game fixed, not crappy game modes like squad CQ. Papering over the cracks by adding game modes like this does nothing to address the glaring problems your game has. Fix the important stuff and add the less important stuff later.

    The one positive I can give this game is that I find its gunplay more solid in comparison to a predecessor like BF1, but that isn't enough to save it. It is just too flawed with too many bugs, too many people lying prone with MMGs. Nobody moves around in this game. It is the campiest Battlefield game I have ever played, and Dice is partly to blame for designing their game in a way that encourages camping.

    I have hardly scratched the surface of everything I could list that I don't like about this game, but I will leave it there. in conclusion, I can't recommend this game as it currently stands. I wish I could but I can't.    … Expand
  19. sebastianali
    Oct 23, 2019
    4
    Mientras que a mi me da igual las estupidas criticas hacia el feminismo, los DLC y que el contexto histórico esta mal, algo que nadie critico es la jugabilidad en si. A diferencia de otros juegos de la saga como el Battlefield Bad Company 2, no hay muchas recompensas mientras vas jugando, las armas estan muy desbalanceadas y no hay matchmaking. Bueno, en el Bad Company 2 no habia tampoco,Mientras que a mi me da igual las estupidas criticas hacia el feminismo, los DLC y que el contexto histórico esta mal, algo que nadie critico es la jugabilidad en si. A diferencia de otros juegos de la saga como el Battlefield Bad Company 2, no hay muchas recompensas mientras vas jugando, las armas estan muy desbalanceadas y no hay matchmaking. Bueno, en el Bad Company 2 no habia tampoco, pero por lo menos estaba tal equilibrado que incluso los novatos tenian oportunidad de jugar. En el online te matan a cada rato. El online, ademas de ser frustrante, haces misiones y misiones y misiones y no ganas nada... solo ganas recolores para las armas y tampoco podes agarrar armas que no tengas desbloqueadas de los enemigos... que cagada monumental. Y por ultimo, al igual que los otros Battlefield, la campaña es aburrida y sin chiste. Por lo menos graficamente esta bastante bien... Pero noto algunos glitches graficos en la lejania. En resumen: Este juego no se merece ni de loco un 0 pero tampoco un 8..... un 4 esta mejor...… Expand
  20. T-Dog
    Feb 23, 2019
    4
    Not really sure what the big critics are seeing here, all i see is a game that asks £50 ($60) for content that is yet to exist, while the game play itself is fairly solid at the same time its nothing special. There simply is not enough here at launch (or even today months later) to justify the price tag. game modes are missing, the weapon choice is poor at best, which is surprising givenNot really sure what the big critics are seeing here, all i see is a game that asks £50 ($60) for content that is yet to exist, while the game play itself is fairly solid at the same time its nothing special. There simply is not enough here at launch (or even today months later) to justify the price tag. game modes are missing, the weapon choice is poor at best, which is surprising given the amount of unique experimental weapons that were in service at the time in which battlefield V is set. If you want a battlefield game to play you are best going back to a previous entry which will be more or less the same experience but complete and cheaper.

    The single player story sections are ok, if you have played battlefield 1's story then it is basically that but worse and much more forgettable. I wont go into more detail to avoid spoilers.

    4/10- if you are wanting a new battlefield to scratch that itch, buy an old one.    … Expand
  21. Thumbuel
    Feb 28, 2019
    4
    The game completely ignores the USSR, Japan, China, the US, Italy, and more. The campaign mission "Nordlys" is historically inaccurate and disrespects the actual commandos who carried out the real mission. The game has no mention of the holocaust whatsoever and doesn't even have the guts to include a single swastika or even call the Germans "Nazis." The maps get stale pretty fast andThe game completely ignores the USSR, Japan, China, the US, Italy, and more. The campaign mission "Nordlys" is historically inaccurate and disrespects the actual commandos who carried out the real mission. The game has no mention of the holocaust whatsoever and doesn't even have the guts to include a single swastika or even call the Germans "Nazis." The maps get stale pretty fast and there's a big problem with the map shuffle. The gameplay is fun and immersive, but that immersion is lost pretty quickly after you get killed by a black female Nazi. A pretty disappointing game overall and definitely not worth your money.… Expand
  22. CaptainMarioPop
    Mar 11, 2019
    4
    I tried to enjoy the game, and to a degree, I do. But it has way too many problems for me to continuously enjoy it. The campaign is extremely boring story wise and way to much stealth used. It feels way to rushed and empty. I never really felt like I was in the middle of a war.

    The multiplayer is ok, but extremely frustrating. Next to no weapon choice and a large amount of them are    I tried to enjoy the game, and to a degree, I do. But it has way too many problems for me to continuously enjoy it. The campaign is extremely boring story wise and way to much stealth used. It feels way to rushed and empty. I never really felt like I was in the middle of a war.

    The multiplayer is ok, but extremely frustrating. Next to no weapon choice and a large amount of them are overpowered like the STG-44 being the dominate weapon. Weapon upgrades have little to no repercussions, causing way too many op builds.Medic is weak with and the smg force medic to be in more risk to revive because of how weak they are.

    The "live service" is very slow and when they do happen, weapons are there for a limited time. Did anyone really complain about how weapons unlocked via challenges that you complete when you can? This system can be even more frustrating especially when the tracker doesn't measure correctly leaving me frustrated when I just got done doing a challenge and THE TRACKER NOT COUNTING IT! Also I know the rest of the factions are coming but it gets boring having to play as only British and the Germans for this long on the same maps. I would honestly like a night version of some of these maps to add variety.

    Honestly, I'm going to wait until the many problems are fixed before going back.    … Expand
  23. 12HD
    Aug 25, 2019
    4
    The game still has lots of glitches, very slow loading and when you sometimes scope in this game it takes forever! This game has been becoming unenjoyable...
  24. Snezzy
    Aug 19, 2019
    4
    Boring story, and a severe lack of content on the multiplayer side. The controls are super clunky and it's just a boring game after the first couple hours
  25. Rockygun1232
    Oct 3, 2019
    4
    Let me get something out of the way, i actually wanted this game to be good. I wasn't caught up in the controversies from the beginning. I have waited nearly a year to review the game to see how it would come out in late 2019. I can tell that this game is a disappointment, the campaign is lazy.

    The campaign isn't fun i thought it would be a improvement from battlefield 1 which had a    Let me get something out of the way, i actually wanted this game to be good. I wasn't caught up in the controversies from the beginning. I have waited nearly a year to review the game to see how it would come out in late 2019. I can tell that this game is a disappointment, the campaign is lazy.

    The campaign isn't fun i thought it would be a improvement from battlefield 1 which had a great campaign. All parts of the campaigns are of small fictionalized battles with no consequences. It doesn't feel like ww2. When you think of ww2 you think of D-day, battle of the bulge, battle of Britain, Dunkirk, stalingrad, iwo gima, etc. Instead you get random very obscure battles (or made up battles). These battles are usually inaccurate like a women replacing the commando who destroyed the German heavy water plant, British commandos are portrayed as criminals, the racism about the Tirailleur is exaggerated, and the last tiger doesn't even have naiz symbols.

    Multiplayer is actually pretty decent but it was short of content on launch and still now. The maps aren't as good and battlefield 1 since their too damn big with no big point everyone fights over. The gun play is pretty great, but this is hurt by squads being smaller, and class guns being very limited.

    Overall underwhelming    … Expand
  26. Mike_the_Bear
    Oct 20, 2019
    4
    Sadly, this one’s a huge disappointment for me on PS4. BF1 graphics were better. BFV has massive optimisation issues to say the least. Framerate drops during achievements, textures take a while to load. Each update introduces more bugs than fixes. You need to grind to unlock cosmetics / face paints that won’t load on time for other players to see anyway. Most cosmetics cannot be purchasedSadly, this one’s a huge disappointment for me on PS4. BF1 graphics were better. BFV has massive optimisation issues to say the least. Framerate drops during achievements, textures take a while to load. Each update introduces more bugs than fixes. You need to grind to unlock cosmetics / face paints that won’t load on time for other players to see anyway. Most cosmetics cannot be purchased with in-game currency but actual money. Very few maps, modes and content. Servers empty for the Battle Royale mode which was one of the few good surprises about this BFV. Cheaters and hackers (how do you get hackers on console?!). A pretty bad episode. Only plus is the atmosphere and audio which are quite immersive and gratifying.… Expand
  27. WinstonSmith72
    Jan 8, 2020
    4
    The flight controls are a **** shambles, honestly, laughably, stupiddd
    Isn't this long enough for a review?
  28. PlayerGoku
    Jun 22, 2020
    4
    Modo Campaña bastante mediocre considerando que dura alrededor de 4 horas y son 4 Historias las cuales son medio aburridas ha excepcion de la ultima que si tenia algo interesante, El modo Multijigador lo encontre aburrido en general y el modo Firestorm (Battle Royale) No voy a opinar, Porque NO, No pienso esperar 20 Minutos para jugar una partida, Tal vez si hacian el Battle RoyaleModo Campaña bastante mediocre considerando que dura alrededor de 4 horas y son 4 Historias las cuales son medio aburridas ha excepcion de la ultima que si tenia algo interesante, El modo Multijigador lo encontre aburrido en general y el modo Firestorm (Battle Royale) No voy a opinar, Porque NO, No pienso esperar 20 Minutos para jugar una partida, Tal vez si hacian el Battle Royale Free-To-Play lo habrian salvado, Pero no fue asi, En resumen Juego aburrido … Expand
  29. Runnerino35
    May 4, 2020
    4
    Я ебал какая хуевая игра. Я заплатил за неё 6000 руб, а она закрывается этим летом. Разрабы ебанулись, идите нахуй с этим своим феминизмом. Ладно феминизм, так ко всему этому игра блять не играется, она не работает. Куча багов, лагов +в fullHD работает и выглядет через жопу. Пошли нахуй с этой парашей. Вангую, Battlefield 6 будет про войну в палеозое за независимых женщин. ;)Я ебал какая хуевая игра. Я заплатил за неё 6000 руб, а она закрывается этим летом. Разрабы ебанулись, идите нахуй с этим своим феминизмом. Ладно феминизм, так ко всему этому игра блять не играется, она не работает. Куча багов, лагов +в fullHD работает и выглядет через жопу. Пошли нахуй с этой парашей. Вангую, Battlefield 6 будет про войну в палеозое за независимых женщин. ;)
  30. Spoonks
    Jun 28, 2021
    4
    Huge Downgrade compared to Battlefield 1. The game felt like a copy-paste from Battlefield 1, but EA edited out the parts that made Battlefield 1 so great.

    I was never a huge fan of Battlefield, I've played 4/5 in the past. I thought both were fun, but I was never addicted them. Until Battlefield 1 came out and I found myself absolutely loving it, probably the best FPS i've ever played.    Huge Downgrade compared to Battlefield 1. The game felt like a copy-paste from Battlefield 1, but EA edited out the parts that made Battlefield 1 so great.

    I was never a huge fan of Battlefield, I've played 4/5 in the past. I thought both were fun, but I was never addicted them. Until Battlefield 1 came out and I found myself absolutely loving it, probably the best FPS i've ever played. i if BF1 was the furture of battlefield, then i am indeed a Battlefield fan.

    The War stories were really unconfusing and didn't feel war-like. I enjoyed all six war stories from Battlefield 1 but I only enjoyed one single war story in Battlefield V (I.E The Last Tiger). The multiplayer was terrible until updates came. The maps gave me "Camp or die" vibes, because camping was a very common strategy compared to most battlefield games. The enemy characters blended in perfectly with the map which made it difficult to kill enemy players.

    War in the Pacific was the greatest of all updates, the maps didn't have the camp or die vibes I was used to and felt different. Non like the rest of the BFV maps that were the same four maps in the same country.

    The Battleroyale gamemode was fun the first ten matches, but eventually got boring. Boins and the skins on the item shop was clearly trying to cash out on Fortnite. Most of the skins didn't look war-like, rather looked like realistic fortnite skins or Mad Max characters. The Skins wern't terrible, but didn't belong in a World War 2 setting.

    I wouldn't recommend Battlefield V for any hardcore Battlefield Fan or history buff.    … Expand
prev
Page:

Awards & Rankings

7
#7 Most Discussed PS4 Game of 2018
39
#39 Most Shared PS4 Game of 2018

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
73

Mixed or average reviews - based on 23 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 15 out of 23
  2. Mixed: 8 out of 23
  3. Negative: 0 out of 23
  1. GameCritics
    Dec 27, 2018
    60
    In many ways, Battlefield V feels like a big step backwards for the franchise. The campaign is boring and frustrating, multiplayer is unbalanced, and bugs keep popping up in every mode to ruin the experience. The fortification system is a good shakeup, but the good it brings is tempered by the cumbersome and murky Grand Operations. With some patches, balance changes and bug squashing, BFV could be a fantastic game, but at the moment, this soldier needs to go back to basic training.
    Read full review
  2. Impulsegamer
    Dec 20, 2018
    76
    EA and DICE seem to have lost sight of what made this series a true contender for the FPS crown, and both the gameplay and the content are suffering as a result.
    Read full review
  3. Playstation Official Magazine UK
    Dec 12, 2018
    80
    Ripe with potential but riddled with problems, the new Battlefield will be brilliant six months from now. Right now, however, it’s merely a good shooter. [Issue#157, p.83]
See all critic reviews »