Battlefield V

 PlayStation 4
User Score
2.7

Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 3123 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 538 out of 3123
  2. Mixed: 363 out of 3123
  3. Negative: 2,222 out of 3123
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. Jesp1
    Dec 21, 2018
    4
    I'm not going to get into the "historical accuracy" aspect of this. Because aside from DICE's horrible defense of their product (Virtue signaling morons), I really do not have a problem with a videogame such as this having less than perfect accuracy. Because obviously gameplay is more important for a FPS. That being said... I've only played multiplayer-Single player campaigns do notI'm not going to get into the "historical accuracy" aspect of this. Because aside from DICE's horrible defense of their product (Virtue signaling morons), I really do not have a problem with a videogame such as this having less than perfect accuracy. Because obviously gameplay is more important for a FPS. That being said... I've only played multiplayer-Single player campaigns do not interest me, particularly in Battlefield games. So for multiplayer.

    Pro's
    -Looks good-I mean seriously some of the environments look great, and real dust and weather can obstruct and be used to advantage.
    -Fast paced and conquest game modes-A charge forward type mode for more combat. Conquest works like conquest does.
    -Weapons appear balanced. No obvious go to guns, though there are a handful of useless ones.
    -Armor does not necessarily dominate-more skill required for armor drivers. Fairly easy to balance the playing field against them.

    Con's
    -Cant freakin' see anyone! While weathering is a cool aspect and the terrain looks great it has the unfortunate side effect of everyone being essentially stealthed. Which can be insanely frustrating.
    -Conquest seems particularly boring?! First time I've felt truly bored by conquest mode. Feels either empty, or chaotic... Not in between.
    -Level up system is meh-I liked attachments better. Its not the worst, but definitely not the best.
    -Cosmetics are also meh-I mean with the lack of reality just go crazy! Lets get some steampunk demons going since we already have black trans Nazi's!
    -air warfare seems detached from the rest of the fight, aside from overpowered bombers! Good luck taking any planes down with flak...
    -#1 no freakin' girls are playing this!!!! Why go through the trouble to market to them when 1% of your audience might be female?! LOL DICE. But whatever...

    Ultimately a disappointment. But not as bad as the Battlefront fiasco. Definitely not going out to buy the next DICE game without real reviews and a markdown. Seriously couldn't care less about the adding female/racial skins to the game, but the response from DICE was more infuriating than the decision. Its a meh game at the moment, worth a markdown buy at least.

    ***Revised score*** Many improvements had recently been made that should have been in release such as TTK, etc. They are also working on some visualization issues (not seeing people as easily). So ultimately some of the flaws no longer exist and I have rated it as an 8 instead.

    ***Revised again*** Fixed game then broke game. DICE is clueless as to balance. Pathetic right now, avoid!!!! Sniper hell.    … Expand
  2. GamergodsFail
    Dec 31, 2018
    4
    There's a big problem with Battlefield V, and it's not because you can't have fun with the multiplayer. It's because of the sheer lack of content. I also need to bring up the lack of innovation. It just feels more like an expansion rather than it's own game, and a very watered down one at that. On a side note, it also offers the worst, shortest and buggiest singleplayer campaign to date.
  3. RB500
    Nov 24, 2018
    4
    Battlefield V feels unfinished. You can see the intended target, the landscape can be gorgeous - but so many areas the gameplay fails to hit the mark, it wants to be COD, but plays like a game off a PS2. The interface and layout is basically a poorer re-skin of Battlefield 1. The dumbing down of the number of weapons in multiplayer and the customizations themselves is frustrating andBattlefield V feels unfinished. You can see the intended target, the landscape can be gorgeous - but so many areas the gameplay fails to hit the mark, it wants to be COD, but plays like a game off a PS2. The interface and layout is basically a poorer re-skin of Battlefield 1. The dumbing down of the number of weapons in multiplayer and the customizations themselves is frustrating and betrays the franchise we know and love.

    I wanted this to be excellent, in a period of history I've wanted next gen graphics. Yes, we had the 'world war 2' is overkill for the past 10 years. We finally came back around for a better new generation version and it falls short here.

    Gameplay and bugs aside, my greater disappointment is the attention to detail, in main the historical inaccuracies and the dumbing down of the uniforms. Look at any historic footage and see the British / Ally units (except for the US) and their webbing and its absence here - all Allies are basically US Army / Marine fatigue webbing belts and canteens.

    The game feels like a cynical FU to the base that complained at original reveal; with a rushed reworking to save itself. This could have been so much more - look at Rockstar and see how quality matters versus target dates.

    So disappointed, I regret the purchase at this point. Post Scriptum here I come...    … Expand
  4. Lewis-Angelo
    Mar 1, 2021
    4
    lo mejor es, sin duda, la banda sonora

    la jugabilidad ha empeorado, va fatal apuntar, usar armas apostadas, o cualquier cosa que tenga que ver con la interacción con el escenario ¿los rifles en la segunda guerra mundial no tenían caída de bala?, ¿los muros eran de adamantium? es triste ver los pasos atrás de una saga que aportaba muchísimo más en 2008 que ahora en la campaña ponen    lo mejor es, sin duda, la banda sonora

    la jugabilidad ha empeorado, va fatal apuntar, usar armas apostadas, o cualquier cosa que tenga que ver con la interacción con el escenario
    ¿los rifles en la segunda guerra mundial no tenían caída de bala?, ¿los muros eran de adamantium?
    es triste ver los pasos atrás de una saga que aportaba muchísimo más en 2008 que ahora

    en la campaña ponen mapas enormes que piden a gritos cooperativo, con una IA retrasada que no falla ni una bala

    está muy bien que quieran contar historias no tan trilladas, pero hacer un juego de WWII y que no aparezcan ni rusos ni americanos...
    un par de ingleses en Egipto, una chica en Noruega, y unos senegaleses en Francia (la mejor), pues no es forma de hacer un juego de la WWII

    El último Tiger está ahí escondida, muy corta, sin trofeos siquiera...

    ya les pasó en Battefield 1 que se pasaron de listos olvidándose de los frentes más importantes
    pero es que en BFV no hay ni nazis

    para próximas entregas tienen que trabajar muchísimo en el motor gráfico y en la jugabilidad
    un estudio en muy baja forma desde BF3    … Expand
  5. mikepatyaev
    Sep 2, 2019
    4
    Enter mankind's greatest conflict with Battlefield 5 as the series goes back to its roots with a never-before-seen portrayal of World War 2
  6. Lowzone
    Jan 16, 2019
    4
    Overrall I was really disapointed with Battlefield V...
    I think the list of pros and cons will speak for itself. (See the list under)
    I won't comment on the multiplayer side since I haven't play enough. I played on a ps4 pro Pros : -Visual is stunning(PS4 Pro) -Liked the acting and the fact that everything is native language -Shooting feels great -Audio 5.1 was immersive and well    Overrall I was really disapointed with Battlefield V...
    I think the list of pros and cons will speak for itself. (See the list under)
    I won't comment on the multiplayer side since I haven't play enough.
    I played on a ps4 pro

    Pros :
    -Visual is stunning(PS4 Pro)
    -Liked the acting and the fact that everything is native language
    -Shooting feels great
    -Audio 5.1 was immersive and well mixed
    -I liked the fact that it's a WWII game that doesn't focus on USSR and USA

    Cons:
    -Nav Mesh issues all around the single player campaign. Ennemies flying over fences and cover
    -When you're about to leave the combat area it's not clear (Level Art) There's a HUD taking the whole screen while you're getting shot at.
    -I've been spot through walls by the AI
    -The first three mission (didn't play the 4th one) have too much Stealth element (IMO) I want to shoot stuff!
    -Infinite loading screen after finishing the Tirailleur chapter
    -The title freezed for about 10 seconds during each cinematic
    -Shooting at invisible collisions with the sniper during the tirailleur chapter(LOTS of them)
    -The game crashed at the end of the last mission.    … Expand
  7. Caerleon
    Nov 18, 2018
    4
    Well, let's start. This isn't an evolution of series, this is a real degradation of Battlefield.
    Why is everything so badly done? Awful level design, meager weapon set, unbalanced weapon.
    Dynamics of the game, graphics, lighting, sounds, movement of characters doesn't look like a game for 60 $. All this is very similar to a free-2-play shooter. I'll start with the lighting on the maps.    Well, let's start. This isn't an evolution of series, this is a real degradation of Battlefield.
    Why is everything so badly done? Awful level design, meager weapon set, unbalanced weapon.
    Dynamics of the game, graphics, lighting, sounds, movement of characters doesn't look like a
    game for 60 $. All this is very similar to a free-2-play shooter.
    I'll start with the lighting on the maps. Dice, what is wrong with your monitors? Check the
    brightness settings. Horrible overexposure or too dark.
    What happened to destructible objects? One gets the feeling that I am throwing not a grenade,
    but some kind of firework. Tanks shoot shells or plush balls? Why they don't destroy a wall?
    Very boring starting maps, but new ones promise “later"
    Why do you make a team game? I don't want to depend on random players! Catastrophically not
    enough ammo. Team members don't want to give ammunition because of this I have to run to a
    warehouse, so as not to be an easy target. Medics are real egoists. No one will help you, no one
    will give you a first aid kit. It is because of these decisions that I feel like an inferior fighting unit
    on a battlefield. Is it possible to set up a tactical map display somewhere in the game settings? I
    don't want to lie down after a critical injury and wait for "potential help." I know that no one will
    help me.
    Is it a shooter or RPG? A lot of upgrades, perks, settings, customization, etc. that overloads an
    interface. I was an opponent of free premium, because nothing good will come of it. When
    premium was paid, we received at least some content, but now we are fed with promises that
    everything will be, but then. Don't think that customization will become easier, now you will
    grind "battle coins".
    Poor spotting system of an enemy. Now only the EXAMPLE area where an enemy was seen is
    shown. This paradise for snipers and campers who love to sit in dark rooms or behind shelters
    For me, and most of my friends, Battlefield 3 was the perfect part. Fair game without too much
    customization, without loot boxes. Will I play it? I don't think. Do I recommend buying it? Yes,
    but with 40-50% discount
    I think Battlefiled 5 will fail as Battlefront 2 Goodbye, BF 5 Goodnight, sweet prince    … Expand
  8. CoreGamer1408
    Dec 4, 2018
    4
    Really fake doctored spin on history that erases the sacrifice of the IRL heroes. With fake characters and stories that nobody gives a flying crap about. Worst yet they released half a game on launch. With the things that made the Battlefields series great not even present. What the hell is this like Call of Duty on training wheels? Half baked under cooked what they hell and they call thisReally fake doctored spin on history that erases the sacrifice of the IRL heroes. With fake characters and stories that nobody gives a flying crap about. Worst yet they released half a game on launch. With the things that made the Battlefields series great not even present. What the hell is this like Call of Duty on training wheels? Half baked under cooked what they hell and they call this Everyone's Battlefield. No wonder this trash dropped by 50% price in the first week with some of the big retailers. Can someone make Battlefield great again? Painfully average game, lacking in content with a weird rewriting of major history for social agenda reasons.… Expand
  9. danield80
    May 7, 2021
    4
    I don't know what the developers were trying to do.
    They focus on how bad and sad war is in the singleplayer, but they have women with artificial limbs in the multiplayer...? They spoon-feed you with incohesive, nonsensical SJW story-telling about how particular groups of people do not get recognition just to later say "We prefer fun over historical accuracy." ...??
    Call of Duty: WW2    I don't know what the developers were trying to do.
    They focus on how bad and sad war is in the singleplayer, but they have women with artificial limbs in the multiplayer...? They spoon-feed you with incohesive, nonsensical SJW story-telling about how particular groups of people do not get recognition just to later say "We prefer fun over historical accuracy." ...??
    Call of Duty: WW2 looks like a masterpiece compared to this.    … Expand
  10. mikect92
    Jan 14, 2019
    4
    This game has such potential. The ideas or strong, the game play good (mostly) and the graphics stunning. But the game is incomplete with whole sections locked with ' coming soon' plastered over them. The game is riddled with bugs which range from slight annoyances to game breaking. But for me, by far the worst aspect of this game is tone. I grew up with the greatest of WW2 shootersThis game has such potential. The ideas or strong, the game play good (mostly) and the graphics stunning. But the game is incomplete with whole sections locked with ' coming soon' plastered over them. The game is riddled with bugs which range from slight annoyances to game breaking. But for me, by far the worst aspect of this game is tone. I grew up with the greatest of WW2 shooters dominating my young gaming life. Medal of Honor Frontlines not only got me into serious gaming but also inspired me to take a university degree in history. Battlefield also defined online multiplayer for me and i am a huge fanboy of the series. But this game does not feel like a Battlefield game, and the claim that it is a realistic WW2 shooter is laughable. I know WW2 games and this does not feel or play like one. The whole experience has been disappointing. A short campaign and repetitive incomplete multiplayer do little to encourage me to replay this game. How did such a great franchise turn so bad? (that's a rhetorical question, the answer is EA)… Expand
  11. DULAccd
    Feb 5, 2021
    4
    I will review this game in 3 parts:Campaign,Multiplayer and Firestorm Battle Royale:

    Campaign: The campaign is very short,repetitive and a little bland.It lacks real details,like symbols on falgs and uniforms but also other things that make the world feel like and ww2 battlefield.As I was expecting,there is no historical accuracy,but that is not a must,as long as the campaign is    I will review this game in 3 parts:Campaign,Multiplayer and Firestorm Battle Royale:

    Campaign:
    The campaign is very short,repetitive and a little bland.It lacks real details,like symbols on falgs and uniforms but also other things that make the world feel like and ww2 battlefield.As I was expecting,there is no historical accuracy,but that is not a must,as long as the campaign is good,which it is not.

    Multiplayer:
    Classic paced battlefield multiplayer,very enjoyable,except for the meta weapons used by campers,which ruin my experience.

    Firestorm BR
    It is an unpolished BR game,with loys of potential,which was not shown much love by the devs.Maybe it was a mistake that it is paid and not free.It is a dead game now,or close to it,but could have been one of the greatest.    … Expand
  12. Dottore
    Nov 16, 2018
    4
    This game is as bad as it gets. It's by far the buggiest, laggiest game I've ever played. If they ever want to get a bigger player database, they should focus on fixing the bugs, game breaking or not. Anyway, in this state, it is not worth full price.
  13. Kiwaso
    Nov 17, 2018
    4
    Is Battlefield 1.5
    I miss the great variety of weapons, vehicles and personalization that Battlefield 4 brought.
  14. RepkaKepka
    Aug 23, 2021
    4
    An interesting idea, not a bad implementation, but there is very little content, the developers no longer have enthusiasm. They forgot about the USSR at all ...
  15. SER06
    Nov 19, 2018
    4
    Вы прекрасно понимаете, почему я так оценил видеоигру.
  16. NWilson
    Nov 21, 2018
    4
    Despite the sensational polarization you see here between users giving this game a 0 and giving it a 10, it is neither. In its current state, assuming 5 is an average game, it is a 4.

    It's an unfinished game with a $60 price tag. The only difference is they don’t plan on charging us for the rest of the game this time like they did with Battlefield 1. I guess that’s why they couldn’t    Despite the sensational polarization you see here between users giving this game a 0 and giving it a 10, it is neither. In its current state, assuming 5 is an average game, it is a 4.

    It's an unfinished game with a $60 price tag. The only difference is they don’t plan on charging us for the rest of the game this time like they did with Battlefield 1. I guess that’s why they couldn’t bother finishing it.

    I bought the Deluxe edition and have been playing since the 15th. My PS4 dock has BFV, BF1, and BF4 on it. They’re all I play. With that in mind, I have to be honest in that even with the flashy new graphics, this game has nothing to offer that isn’t already more polished and enjoyable in BF1 or BF4, depending on your play style preferences. The only other interesting factor - the historical context - isn’t really even truly there. I’m not going to knock the game for taking creative liberties, but it very truly does not look like WWII much of the time.

    With that in mind, the gunplay is great. There are some important gameplay changes that I’m happy to see. Ammo is a factor to be concerned about again, both for infantry and vehicles. The building system makes for interesting situations that keep the battlefield dynamic and changing.

    But the game just isn’t there. The single player campaign is still an afterthought with little depth (and there is still an entire story of the campaign which they haven’t finished yet). The music isn’t even a shadow of what it was in BF1. There are fewer multiplayer maps on release than there were in BF1 or BF4. Grand Operations is fundamentally broken, and doesn’t provide the same excitement as BF1’s operations - whether you win or lose has no effect on the “outcome” of the battle in its historical context. There are no Russians, French, Americans, Japanese, or other factions besides the British and the Germans. For the so-called “staggered release” the developers planned, there are weapons from all years of the war present, even though it’s supposed to only take place in 1940 - see, e.g., the STG44 or the MG42.

    This game had a lot of bad press, and probably rightfully so. EA and Dice handled customer backlash in an extremely poor and unprofessional manner. The beta was a mess and worried a lot of people given its proximity to the original release date. There are a lot of triggered people because it has women in it or has customizable characters. I truly could not care less. It’s a video game. I understand that WWII is still a very emotional subject for a lot of people - we had 5 KIA in my own family. But it’s a video game. We had a KIA in the First World War as well, and BF1 wasn’t a pinnacle of historical accuracy either, by almost any measure. Maybe people just love history. There are still great, historically accurate WWII games out there. I’d suggest getting into PC gaming if that’s your thing. Here, though, I’m glad people are going to be able to feel comfortable looking like themselves in a game. But for all the fancy trendsetting...

    It just doesn’t work. It was poorly marketed, poorly planned, and poorly executed. It could be a very, very great game. It just isn’t in its current state, and there is a lot of work to be done.

    If you want this game, don’t buy it yet. Give it 3-6 months.    … Expand
  17. Wolfgang1978zmc
    Nov 21, 2018
    4
    Again we have not finish game looks like beta version, maybe 50@% why we need pay for extra content should be for free
  18. cswbizzel
    Feb 16, 2019
    4
    I have 5 days of play time in this game and I am running out of reasons to carry on playing. I have tried to like it, I really have. I can look past the SJW stuff if the game is functional and fun, but it just isn't. The game is a chore to play. It seems that every update brings with it more problems, more game breaking bugs and more things the community did not want nor ever asked for.I have 5 days of play time in this game and I am running out of reasons to carry on playing. I have tried to like it, I really have. I can look past the SJW stuff if the game is functional and fun, but it just isn't. The game is a chore to play. It seems that every update brings with it more problems, more game breaking bugs and more things the community did not want nor ever asked for. Since launch, the game has suffered problems in virtually all departments, especially the sound, movement, and in-game visibility. Despite updates to address all these problems, they still persist.

    The game's lack of commercial success coupled with the loss of revenue due to the lack of a premium pass is worrisome for the future of this game and the Battlefield series as a whole. I fear because of these two reasons there will be less incentive on EA/Dice's part to see this game through to its conclusion. It already feels as though they've started to give up on it just months after release by pushing out generic updates that rarely add anything noteworthy, and in some cases even take the game back two steps.

    The maps are some of the most unremarkable I recall in the Battlefield series and they start to feel stale very quickly as a consequence. The only ones that I like are Devastation, Rotterdam and Arras. The others fall between mediocre and outright appalling.

    I reached rank 50 and unlocked pretty much everything I wanted after just 24 hours of playtime. That is not what I consider a good progression system if I ever saw one. Why not add more ranks, more skins, more costumes instead of wasting development time and budget on game modes that nobody plays or cares about, Dice? Better still, add more maps, factions and make this game feel like a WWII game, because it feels nothing of the sort at present. You hardly ever listen to what the fans want, Dice, and that's your biggest problem. The community says they want one thing and you give them the polar opposite. They want the core game fixed, not crappy game modes like squad CQ. Papering over the cracks by adding game modes like this does nothing to address the glaring problems your game has. Fix the important stuff and add the less important stuff later.

    The one positive I can give this game is that I find its gunplay more solid in comparison to a predecessor like BF1, but that isn't enough to save it. It is just too flawed with too many bugs, too many people lying prone with MMGs. Nobody moves around in this game. It is the campiest Battlefield game I have ever played, and Dice is partly to blame for designing their game in a way that encourages camping.

    I have hardly scratched the surface of everything I could list that I don't like about this game, but I will leave it there. in conclusion, I can't recommend this game as it currently stands. I wish I could but I can't.    … Expand
  19. sebastianali
    Oct 23, 2019
    4
    Mientras que a mi me da igual las estupidas criticas hacia el feminismo, los DLC y que el contexto histórico esta mal, algo que nadie critico es la jugabilidad en si. A diferencia de otros juegos de la saga como el Battlefield Bad Company 2, no hay muchas recompensas mientras vas jugando, las armas estan muy desbalanceadas y no hay matchmaking. Bueno, en el Bad Company 2 no habia tampoco,Mientras que a mi me da igual las estupidas criticas hacia el feminismo, los DLC y que el contexto histórico esta mal, algo que nadie critico es la jugabilidad en si. A diferencia de otros juegos de la saga como el Battlefield Bad Company 2, no hay muchas recompensas mientras vas jugando, las armas estan muy desbalanceadas y no hay matchmaking. Bueno, en el Bad Company 2 no habia tampoco, pero por lo menos estaba tal equilibrado que incluso los novatos tenian oportunidad de jugar. En el online te matan a cada rato. El online, ademas de ser frustrante, haces misiones y misiones y misiones y no ganas nada... solo ganas recolores para las armas y tampoco podes agarrar armas que no tengas desbloqueadas de los enemigos... que cagada monumental. Y por ultimo, al igual que los otros Battlefield, la campaña es aburrida y sin chiste. Por lo menos graficamente esta bastante bien... Pero noto algunos glitches graficos en la lejania. En resumen: Este juego no se merece ni de loco un 0 pero tampoco un 8..... un 4 esta mejor...… Expand
  20. T-Dog
    Feb 23, 2019
    4
    Not really sure what the big critics are seeing here, all i see is a game that asks £50 ($60) for content that is yet to exist, while the game play itself is fairly solid at the same time its nothing special. There simply is not enough here at launch (or even today months later) to justify the price tag. game modes are missing, the weapon choice is poor at best, which is surprising givenNot really sure what the big critics are seeing here, all i see is a game that asks £50 ($60) for content that is yet to exist, while the game play itself is fairly solid at the same time its nothing special. There simply is not enough here at launch (or even today months later) to justify the price tag. game modes are missing, the weapon choice is poor at best, which is surprising given the amount of unique experimental weapons that were in service at the time in which battlefield V is set. If you want a battlefield game to play you are best going back to a previous entry which will be more or less the same experience but complete and cheaper.

    The single player story sections are ok, if you have played battlefield 1's story then it is basically that but worse and much more forgettable. I wont go into more detail to avoid spoilers.

    4/10- if you are wanting a new battlefield to scratch that itch, buy an old one.    … Expand
  21. Thumbuel
    Feb 28, 2019
    4
    The game completely ignores the USSR, Japan, China, the US, Italy, and more. The campaign mission "Nordlys" is historically inaccurate and disrespects the actual commandos who carried out the real mission. The game has no mention of the holocaust whatsoever and doesn't even have the guts to include a single swastika or even call the Germans "Nazis." The maps get stale pretty fast andThe game completely ignores the USSR, Japan, China, the US, Italy, and more. The campaign mission "Nordlys" is historically inaccurate and disrespects the actual commandos who carried out the real mission. The game has no mention of the holocaust whatsoever and doesn't even have the guts to include a single swastika or even call the Germans "Nazis." The maps get stale pretty fast and there's a big problem with the map shuffle. The gameplay is fun and immersive, but that immersion is lost pretty quickly after you get killed by a black female Nazi. A pretty disappointing game overall and definitely not worth your money.… Expand
  22. CaptainMarioPop
    Mar 11, 2019
    4
    I tried to enjoy the game, and to a degree, I do. But it has way too many problems for me to continuously enjoy it. The campaign is extremely boring story wise and way to much stealth used. It feels way to rushed and empty. I never really felt like I was in the middle of a war.

    The multiplayer is ok, but extremely frustrating. Next to no weapon choice and a large amount of them are    I tried to enjoy the game, and to a degree, I do. But it has way too many problems for me to continuously enjoy it. The campaign is extremely boring story wise and way to much stealth used. It feels way to rushed and empty. I never really felt like I was in the middle of a war.

    The multiplayer is ok, but extremely frustrating. Next to no weapon choice and a large amount of them are overpowered like the STG-44 being the dominate weapon. Weapon upgrades have little to no repercussions, causing way too many op builds.Medic is weak with and the smg force medic to be in more risk to revive because of how weak they are.

    The "live service" is very slow and when they do happen, weapons are there for a limited time. Did anyone really complain about how weapons unlocked via challenges that you complete when you can? This system can be even more frustrating especially when the tracker doesn't measure correctly leaving me frustrated when I just got done doing a challenge and THE TRACKER NOT COUNTING IT! Also I know the rest of the factions are coming but it gets boring having to play as only British and the Germans for this long on the same maps. I would honestly like a night version of some of these maps to add variety.

    Honestly, I'm going to wait until the many problems are fixed before going back.    … Expand
  23. 12HD
    Aug 25, 2019
    4
    The game still has lots of glitches, very slow loading and when you sometimes scope in this game it takes forever! This game has been becoming unenjoyable...
  24. Snezzy
    Aug 19, 2019
    4
    Boring story, and a severe lack of content on the multiplayer side. The controls are super clunky and it's just a boring game after the first couple hours
  25. Rockygun1232
    Oct 3, 2019
    4
    Let me get something out of the way, i actually wanted this game to be good. I wasn't caught up in the controversies from the beginning. I have waited nearly a year to review the game to see how it would come out in late 2019. I can tell that this game is a disappointment, the campaign is lazy.

    The campaign isn't fun i thought it would be a improvement from battlefield 1 which had a    Let me get something out of the way, i actually wanted this game to be good. I wasn't caught up in the controversies from the beginning. I have waited nearly a year to review the game to see how it would come out in late 2019. I can tell that this game is a disappointment, the campaign is lazy.

    The campaign isn't fun i thought it would be a improvement from battlefield 1 which had a great campaign. All parts of the campaigns are of small fictionalized battles with no consequences. It doesn't feel like ww2. When you think of ww2 you think of D-day, battle of the bulge, battle of Britain, Dunkirk, stalingrad, iwo gima, etc. Instead you get random very obscure battles (or made up battles). These battles are usually inaccurate like a women replacing the commando who destroyed the German heavy water plant, British commandos are portrayed as criminals, the racism about the Tirailleur is exaggerated, and the last tiger doesn't even have naiz symbols.

    Multiplayer is actually pretty decent but it was short of content on launch and still now. The maps aren't as good and battlefield 1 since their too damn big with no big point everyone fights over. The gun play is pretty great, but this is hurt by squads being smaller, and class guns being very limited.

    Overall underwhelming    … Expand
  26. Mike_the_Bear
    Oct 20, 2019
    4
    Sadly, this one’s a huge disappointment for me on PS4. BF1 graphics were better. BFV has massive optimisation issues to say the least. Framerate drops during achievements, textures take a while to load. Each update introduces more bugs than fixes. You need to grind to unlock cosmetics / face paints that won’t load on time for other players to see anyway. Most cosmetics cannot be purchasedSadly, this one’s a huge disappointment for me on PS4. BF1 graphics were better. BFV has massive optimisation issues to say the least. Framerate drops during achievements, textures take a while to load. Each update introduces more bugs than fixes. You need to grind to unlock cosmetics / face paints that won’t load on time for other players to see anyway. Most cosmetics cannot be purchased with in-game currency but actual money. Very few maps, modes and content. Servers empty for the Battle Royale mode which was one of the few good surprises about this BFV. Cheaters and hackers (how do you get hackers on console?!). A pretty bad episode. Only plus is the atmosphere and audio which are quite immersive and gratifying.… Expand
  27. WinstonSmith72
    Jan 8, 2020
    4
    The flight controls are a **** shambles, honestly, laughably, stupiddd
    Isn't this long enough for a review?
  28. PlayerGoku
    Jun 22, 2020
    4
    Modo Campaña bastante mediocre considerando que dura alrededor de 4 horas y son 4 Historias las cuales son medio aburridas ha excepcion de la ultima que si tenia algo interesante, El modo Multijigador lo encontre aburrido en general y el modo Firestorm (Battle Royale) No voy a opinar, Porque NO, No pienso esperar 20 Minutos para jugar una partida, Tal vez si hacian el Battle RoyaleModo Campaña bastante mediocre considerando que dura alrededor de 4 horas y son 4 Historias las cuales son medio aburridas ha excepcion de la ultima que si tenia algo interesante, El modo Multijigador lo encontre aburrido en general y el modo Firestorm (Battle Royale) No voy a opinar, Porque NO, No pienso esperar 20 Minutos para jugar una partida, Tal vez si hacian el Battle Royale Free-To-Play lo habrian salvado, Pero no fue asi, En resumen Juego aburrido … Expand
  29. Runnerino35
    May 4, 2020
    4
    Я ебал какая хуевая игра. Я заплатил за неё 6000 руб, а она закрывается этим летом. Разрабы ебанулись, идите нахуй с этим своим феминизмом. Ладно феминизм, так ко всему этому игра блять не играется, она не работает. Куча багов, лагов +в fullHD работает и выглядет через жопу. Пошли нахуй с этой парашей. Вангую, Battlefield 6 будет про войну в палеозое за независимых женщин. ;)Я ебал какая хуевая игра. Я заплатил за неё 6000 руб, а она закрывается этим летом. Разрабы ебанулись, идите нахуй с этим своим феминизмом. Ладно феминизм, так ко всему этому игра блять не играется, она не работает. Куча багов, лагов +в fullHD работает и выглядет через жопу. Пошли нахуй с этой парашей. Вангую, Battlefield 6 будет про войну в палеозое за независимых женщин. ;)
  30. Spoonks
    Jun 28, 2021
    4
    Huge Downgrade compared to Battlefield 1. The game felt like a copy-paste from Battlefield 1, but EA edited out the parts that made Battlefield 1 so great.

    I was never a huge fan of Battlefield, I've played 4/5 in the past. I thought both were fun, but I was never addicted them. Until Battlefield 1 came out and I found myself absolutely loving it, probably the best FPS i've ever played.    Huge Downgrade compared to Battlefield 1. The game felt like a copy-paste from Battlefield 1, but EA edited out the parts that made Battlefield 1 so great.

    I was never a huge fan of Battlefield, I've played 4/5 in the past. I thought both were fun, but I was never addicted them. Until Battlefield 1 came out and I found myself absolutely loving it, probably the best FPS i've ever played. i if BF1 was the furture of battlefield, then i am indeed a Battlefield fan.

    The War stories were really unconfusing and didn't feel war-like. I enjoyed all six war stories from Battlefield 1 but I only enjoyed one single war story in Battlefield V (I.E The Last Tiger). The multiplayer was terrible until updates came. The maps gave me "Camp or die" vibes, because camping was a very common strategy compared to most battlefield games. The enemy characters blended in perfectly with the map which made it difficult to kill enemy players.

    War in the Pacific was the greatest of all updates, the maps didn't have the camp or die vibes I was used to and felt different. Non like the rest of the BFV maps that were the same four maps in the same country.

    The Battleroyale gamemode was fun the first ten matches, but eventually got boring. Boins and the skins on the item shop was clearly trying to cash out on Fortnite. Most of the skins didn't look war-like, rather looked like realistic fortnite skins or Mad Max characters. The Skins wern't terrible, but didn't belong in a World War 2 setting.

    I wouldn't recommend Battlefield V for any hardcore Battlefield Fan or history buff.    … Expand
  31. MatheusBug007
    Jun 30, 2020
    4
    jogo nuito fraco, com mapas muito ruins e uma gameplay que não te prende. Além de ser mais um jogo do passado, espero que volte pra era moderna
  32. MuellerWI
    Jul 2, 2020
    4
    DICE has fallen so far since Battlefield 3. One would think it would be difficult for DICE to fall lower than the state Battlefield 4 released in but they've managed to outdo themselves with Battlefield 5. it's baffling how DICE managed to underdeliver on a World War II game.

    Not only did they lie to the community about not nerfing TTK but they also completely left the Russians out of    DICE has fallen so far since Battlefield 3. One would think it would be difficult for DICE to fall lower than the state Battlefield 4 released in but they've managed to outdo themselves with Battlefield 5. it's baffling how DICE managed to underdeliver on a World War II game.

    Not only did they lie to the community about not nerfing TTK but they also completely left the Russians out of the game and never delivered maps from pinnacle World War II moments (aside from a couple in the Pacific). DICE also managed to create on their worst menu experience to date and failed to deliver on essential roadmap items.    … Expand
  33. SourApple
    Jul 19, 2020
    4
    The story is super disappointing, not sure if you can even call it a story. Battlefield should take its previous games story’s as an example such as bf3 and bf4 which were incredibly action packed. The multiplayer feels awkward and boring. Not the WW2 game everyone was waiting for.
  34. M1sfiT__
    Aug 23, 2020
    4
    As peculiaridades da Dice continuam ali. Quando vc mata vários inimigos com HS de sniper e ele começa a fazer a contagem baixinho. Os detalhes, gráficos. Maravilhosos. A gunplay é muito boa também, mas a imersão simplesmente não existe. É um jogo de guerra com armas antigas. Não tem nada de segunda guerra. O feeling, nada.
  35. Glemial
    Jun 22, 2021
    4
    Playing this game after BF1 is so **** disappointing. Actually this game is worse than it's predecessor in every single aspect, and here is why:
    None of the multiplayer maps are interesting
    Too game is totally unpolished, having too many bugs The atmosphere is trash, as you don't feel like you are at the WWII any time Vehicles are too overpower, as you constantly see tanks from the    Playing this game after BF1 is so **** disappointing. Actually this game is worse than it's predecessor in every single aspect, and here is why:
    None of the multiplayer maps are interesting
    Too game is totally unpolished, having too many bugs
    The atmosphere is trash, as you don't feel like you are at the WWII any time
    Vehicles are too overpower, as you constantly see tanks from the other side of the map killing everyone and no one can fight back. The same happens with planes, because the AA tanks are totally useless against it, as you needs too much AA shots to kill the planes, but it can one hit destroy your tank with a bomb. The only useful counter planes in this game is the fliegerfaust or another plane.
    The recon class is useless on console, and you never see any being top 5 in scoreboard
    The weapons are too unbalanced, with some being so much superior than others
    The story mode is a complete waste of time. None of the stories are interesting
    How in the hell can a game be about the WWII and do not have USSR, France and Italy there? Seriously DICE?
    And now is time to the visibility problem, which is the worst of all. I have never played a game with a so bad visibility in my gaming experience! There is times that the enemy is in your front, but you don't see him. And don't come with the excuse of this being good camouflage, because even the people with microtransaction clothing that the color has nothing similar to the environment is hard to see in this game. If you are prone you can became invisible in that game. There was one time i was prone in the bridge of Twisted Steel and at least 15 enemies passed by me without noticing my presence. Then i backstabbed 4 guys with a knife before die LOL

    So, i give this game a 4 only because with friends you can have some time of fun, but i do not recommend anyone to buy it    … Expand
  36. chernandez31
    Feb 23, 2022
    4
    Sad. Why do these companies keep messing up WWII games? It’s insane. Just copy and paste the WWII aspect onto BF1 and you’re done, it’s that simple. Such a shame. And it has a garbage single player story.
  37. Artex33Gaming
    May 1, 2023
    4
    It is almost unplayable because of the hackers.
    Without hackers, it would be a 7/10. Play Battlefield 1 instead.
  38. uazzz007
    Nov 10, 2020
    3
    This is the worst battlefield ever. Some classes like support are just nerfed to the ground, new **** mechanics, snipers are OP. The color palette is so **** bright that sometimes it is hard to see an enemy. Soldiers uniforms are confusing sometimes because of skins (and thats not only my problem. i saw many times my teammates tried to shoot me). TTK is hight. Snipers - op as **** lots ofThis is the worst battlefield ever. Some classes like support are just nerfed to the ground, new **** mechanics, snipers are OP. The color palette is so **** bright that sometimes it is hard to see an enemy. Soldiers uniforms are confusing sometimes because of skins (and thats not only my problem. i saw many times my teammates tried to shoot me). TTK is hight. Snipers - op as **** lots of maps where it is hard to hide. Is modern level design is just a flat surface and a bunch of rocks? A lot of open spaces where you are just like shooting dummy. Global operations don't have narrative logic coz no matter if you win or lose - you still gonna start "A new day" on the next location what is just baloney and doesn't make any sense. Submachine gun are no more a weapon - just garbage. Bipod mechanics doesn't work properly and cause you pain in the ass. New health system - **** that makes you play safer and force new players to camp. There is no such thing in this game that works just right. If the next game will be that bad - the series is dead.
    PS. Just a tip. Fire your game designer - He doesn't know his game and why do people play Battlefied...    … Expand
  39. v3it
    Mar 3, 2019
    3
    Long time battlefield veteran (250h 1945, 350h bf2bc, 200h bfviet, 600h bf3, 400h bf4, 500h bf1, 180h bfv = almost 2500h bf - not to be continued) extremely disappointed!

    Some things can be forgiven or just overlooked. Others cant. This game is a complete disgrace for everything battlefield once might have been famous for; and im not talking about minor inaccuritys. - flawed    Long time battlefield veteran (250h 1945, 350h bf2bc, 200h bfviet, 600h bf3, 400h bf4, 500h bf1, 180h bfv = almost 2500h bf - not to be continued) extremely disappointed!

    Some things can be forgiven or just overlooked. Others cant.
    This game is a complete disgrace for everything battlefield once might have been famous for; and im not talking about minor inaccuritys.

    - flawed gameplay / gunplay, feeling of being hit, visibility of enemys, movement (alot of the times you cant even jump tiny ledges)
    - bug and glitches / just everywhere, wont start cuz cant finish...
    - no content / month after release of a full price game still no new maps (8 maps to play, at least half of them real trash and no fun to play at all, random map generator could do better), only 2 factions in a ww2 game (you must be kidding "lets see how far we can go, how much of a joke this game can get and people still preorder the luxury edition - hahahaha" **** off dice....)
    - poor design / implementation of grand operations (just put a "grand" into it; makes it a whole lot better right?) what happened to the great introduction themes of bf1 operations, the cool maps of bf3, the variation of tools and vehicles of bf4? this game is plain empty

    I give it a 3/10 just out of pure sentimental reason. loved you battlefield. I am done with you. Hope you stay dead. You should leave it alone. Rest in peace!!!

    To make it simple. This game is a joke and more a torture to play than fun whatsoever.    … Expand
  40. BBUENO
    Jan 13, 2019
    3
    Je sanctionne sévèrement car je trouve indécent de réécrire une guerre historique aussi importante que la deuxième guerre mondiale pour "mieux" convenir aux idéaux commerciales de 2019.
    Il y a des gosses qui apprennent l'histoire par les jeux.
    Encore Call Of Duty ou Medal of Honor traitent très bien le sujet mais là sur ce BF5 c'est ridicule. La vraie Histoire de l'humanité n'est t'elle    Je sanctionne sévèrement car je trouve indécent de réécrire une guerre historique aussi importante que la deuxième guerre mondiale pour "mieux" convenir aux idéaux commerciales de 2019.
    Il y a des gosses qui apprennent l'histoire par les jeux.
    Encore Call Of Duty ou Medal of Honor traitent très bien le sujet mais là sur ce BF5 c'est ridicule.
    La vraie Histoire de l'humanité n'est t'elle pas suffisamment vendeuse pour EA ?
    Désolé mais l'égalité homme femme en 1940 à l'armée ça n'existait pas.
    J'ai rien contre le fait de mettre en avant le rôle des femmes pendant la WW2 bien au contraire mais de les mettres à pieds d'égalité avec les hommes c'est FAUX.
    Encore plus ridicule, transformer les Nazis en simple "nation allemande" ou en "axe" c'est un non sens historique complet.

    Je n'ai rien contre le fait qu'on invente des conflits pour des scénarios de films ou de jeux mais quand on parle histoire il y a un minimum de respect à avoir.

    Sinon le multi est correct, difficile de voir l'évolution depuis BF1 c'est juste des règles de jeux différentes et des sensations de tir un peu ajusté.
    Le jeu bug beaucoup, menu mal optimisé.
    EA va falloir faire mieux que ça.
    M    … Expand
  41. piratuk
    Nov 22, 2018
    3
    Окей, пускай будут девушки, пускай не будет советов. Геймплей окончательно скатился к убогому тиру. Игра не мотивирует координировать действия, нет ощущения масштабности, нет ничего, кроме дрочильни фрагов и... всё. Всё супер плохо.Окей, пускай будут девушки, пускай не будет советов. Геймплей окончательно скатился к убогому тиру. Игра не мотивирует координировать действия, нет ощущения масштабности, нет ничего, кроме дрочильни фрагов и... всё. Всё супер плохо.
  42. HTGamer
    Nov 21, 2018
    3
    Do political and social issues have a place in games' narratives? Yes, if they are done right. Look at Hellblade for example, an excellent game about dementia. But what if corporate greed coupled with political correctness, feminism and SJW agenda make it into games, in the name of "appealing to everyone and not just white teen boys from the West"? You get games such as (but not limitedDo political and social issues have a place in games' narratives? Yes, if they are done right. Look at Hellblade for example, an excellent game about dementia. But what if corporate greed coupled with political correctness, feminism and SJW agenda make it into games, in the name of "appealing to everyone and not just white teen boys from the West"? You get games such as (but not limited to) Battlefield V.

    I know Battlefield V is just a game and it's not supposed to teach history. Problem is, DICE said they "put fun over authenticity", which doesn't make sense because Battlefield has traditionally been a historical FPS series (well, not too historically accurate, but you get my point). When you depict women and tattoed people fighting in the frontlines of WW2 like action heroes and featuring prosthetic arms in the 1940s with an eye towards today's sociopolitical climate, it's not a historical FPS anymore, neither historical fiction. It's not even alternative history, like the Wolfenstein series, or cyberpunk like the Dishonored series. It's historical revision to appease the crazed feminists and SJWs of modern times.

    Don't get me wrong, women and black people and Asians and others did help in WW2 battles against the Axis powers, but historical facts differ significantly from what the game shows. If EA and DICE made a game set in modern or future times, there would be no "historical accuracy" controversy. But WW2 was not like this. Like it or not, it was mostly fought by white men. I'm not campaigning for white/male supremacy or anything like it, but History needs to be treated with care and respect, not be manipulated to serve anybody's agendas.

    Judging it as a game though, Battlefield V's gameplay (at least in multiplayer modes) is solid. The same Battlefield gameplay experience since BF3 is still here, more or less. Now you can build some fortifications (inspired by Fortnite's build mechanic) in predetermined spots, trying to get an edge over the adversaries. Graphics are great, but on consoles pop-in can be eye-catching. Frame rate on PS4 is mostly in the 50-60 fps range. But Battlefield V is severely lacking in content, even for a game that's supposed to be expanded upon and supported for a year. The campaign (aka tutorial) features a handful of small War Stories (like in Battlefield 1), but they are very short and the enemy AI is quite dumb. There are very few maps at launch. And the battle royale mode doesn't launch until March 2019 or so. At least there are no loot boxes in Battlefield V, and DLCs will be free of charge.

    If you are a Battlefield series veteran, you know what to expect. But I'd advise people to wait for more content to be added before they buy the game.    … Expand
  43. kurniau
    Mar 15, 2020
    3
    Феминистическое говно, это очень точный диагноз для части игры. В целом разработчики нового ничего не придумали, а некоторые механики умудрились испортить. Худший батлфилд
  44. rednutgaming
    Apr 10, 2019
    3
    I have played Every Battlefield game in the franchise and this would have to be hands down the worst game in the series. Same old Battlefield with only slight cosmetic changes and is a bug haven. Poor old dice struggled for ideas so much they had to use a Battle Royal mode to try and pull them out of the grief. All in all if you want to spend money for a map update and slight changes ifI have played Every Battlefield game in the franchise and this would have to be hands down the worst game in the series. Same old Battlefield with only slight cosmetic changes and is a bug haven. Poor old dice struggled for ideas so much they had to use a Battle Royal mode to try and pull them out of the grief. All in all if you want to spend money for a map update and slight changes if any to the game play this game is right up your alley otherwise give it a miss because unfortunately EA are continuing to churn these slightly changed games and expecting the consumer to buy it when they really haven't offered the consumer anything different from the last title!! I could go on about historical accuracy to but its been done and you know what all that's about its absolute fiction set in the 1930-40's.… Expand
  45. CosmicFog
    Nov 24, 2018
    3
    I cannot even explain how disappointing this game is, coming from a Battfield fan for many many years. I will give you an honest review after putting in about 15 hours of gameplay.
    The pros? The graphics are beautiful, the music is great and emotional as in BF1, and off the top of my head that’s about all I can think of that stands out as far as being positive.
    The cons? Well sit back    I cannot even explain how disappointing this game is, coming from a Battfield fan for many many years. I will give you an honest review after putting in about 15 hours of gameplay.
    The pros? The graphics are beautiful, the music is great and emotional as in BF1, and off the top of my head that’s about all I can think of that stands out as far as being positive.
    The cons? Well sit back folks cause here we go...first off I’m a huge fan of the audio/sounds of the firearms in any game. In this one however every gun sounds the same. Sniper rifles when fired you think it’s a cap gun, all the semi automatic rifles sounds exactly the same. And the same goes with full automatic guns as well, just with different firing rates. Let’s talk about the maps...they are cluttered. So cluttered that Battlefield has (believe it or not) choke points. Basically what I’m saying is that it’s such a pain in the rear to constantly push the jump button hoping you’ll be able to hop over debris or rocks, your forced to go down lanes on certain maps where your enemy is just looking down his sights ready to feed you his bullets. Especially on the game mode “Breakthrough”. The maps are much smaller than your previous BF experience. They feel very claustrophobic for a battlefield map. Like for example the map called Devastation just feels very very tiny and cluttered. Let’s move onto the spawning aspect. It’s horrible, frustrating and abysmal for a Battlefield game. I never in my experience of playing any BF that I spawn on a captured base and got killed instantly. And it happens a lot in this game. The balancing is the worst as well. The guns actually pretty much suck except for maybe two guns I can use and they both belong from the assault class. Overall, the game isn’t giving me anything exciting to talk about, The multiplayer just seems boring, and you don’t get that chaotic war fighting feeling as in BF1, which made the game very addicting. Med class users don’t revive, support doesn’t drop ammo, and basically everyone is confused on how to properly use their classes. I don’t like the historical aspect they chose for this game either. The smaller battles that took place that really nobody talks about, and I appreciate that from Dice, but it’s completely inaccurate. I’m hoping the DLC will bring in those battles we all know and talk about from WW2, because right now it does not feel like a WW2 game at all. And maybe some patches to fix the many problems as well in the near future. Believe it or not I’m having more fun with Black Ops 4 than this game as of right now. And I almost threw up in my mouth by typing that.    … Expand
  46. Zloybig
    Nov 19, 2018
    3
    Graphic is good, the sound is great, lack of the content. Everyone knows that women's take part, but not 60% or more... but come on... these feminism things everywhere, what is going wrong with this world. Before buying this game check top streamers and I have a strong feeling that DICE pay them all, only positive reviews. This game has no historical background at all, I could understandGraphic is good, the sound is great, lack of the content. Everyone knows that women's take part, but not 60% or more... but come on... these feminism things everywhere, what is going wrong with this world. Before buying this game check top streamers and I have a strong feeling that DICE pay them all, only positive reviews. This game has no historical background at all, I could understand that all the world hates post-soviet countries, but one of the most powerful army not even mentioned in the game? More female, Afro-Americans and tolerance. Have a strong feeling that authors don't know anything about WW2. Disappointed...… Expand
  47. Kordas
    Nov 21, 2018
    3
    Ich wollte dieses Spiel wirklich mögen, aber dass ist mir einfach nicht Möglich. BF1 war jetzt seit 2 Jahren eines meiner Lieblingsspiele und deswegen habe ich mich natürlich auch auf den Nachfolger gefreut und diesen auch Vorbestellt. Nach dem Spielen der Beta hatte ich bereits gemerkt das BFV sich wirklich anders spielt als BF1 und meiner Meinung nach größtenteils eben schlechterIch wollte dieses Spiel wirklich mögen, aber dass ist mir einfach nicht Möglich. BF1 war jetzt seit 2 Jahren eines meiner Lieblingsspiele und deswegen habe ich mich natürlich auch auf den Nachfolger gefreut und diesen auch Vorbestellt. Nach dem Spielen der Beta hatte ich bereits gemerkt das BFV sich wirklich anders spielt als BF1 und meiner Meinung nach größtenteils eben schlechter anders.

    Meine bevorzugten Klassen waren bisher: Sanitäter, Panzerfahrer und Pilot. Die Änderungen gerade an den Mechaniken dieser Klassen versaut mir schon vieles am Spielspaß.
    Beim Sanitäter wurde das Wiederbeleben unnötig kompliziert gemacht, es dauert länger und dadurch dass es auf der selben Taste wie der Waffentausch ist steht man oft mit der Waffe des zu Rettenden in der Hand blöd auf dem Feld herum. Gerade das Wiederbeleben zu erschweren ist natürlich eine super Idee wenn man bedenkt dass man auch in BF1 kaum wiederbelebt wurde, da wird dass im Spiel natürlich jetzt viel besser laufen wenn man es den Sanis auch noch schwer macht...
    Beim Panzer braucht man gar nicht erst anfangen, da diese sich einfach komplett anders spielen als im Vorgänger und zudem Rarer sind als ein rosa Einhorn.
    Die Flugzeuge sind schlecht Manövrierfähig und eignen sich mangels schlechter Übersicht auch überhaupt nicht mehr für Bodenziele also kann man sich nur noch im Luft-Luft Kampf in seiner eigenen Welt zu tode langweilen.

    Im Allgemeinen Ist auch das Komplette Spiel unübersichtlich, Flaggensymbole sind schwer zu erkennen wodurch man gerade am Anfang wenn man die Maps noch nicht so gut kennt gezwungen ist andauernd auf seine Minimap zu glotzen um rauszufinden wo denn ein Punkt ist. Freundsymbole sind leicht zu übersehen wodurch Freund-Feind Verwechslungen an der Tagesordnung sind.

    Die Grand Operations waren für mich bisher immer nur die selbe Erfahrung nämlich; springe aus einem Flugzeug und werde erschossen, oder warte an einem Punkt und erschiesse die Leute die aus dem Flugzeug springen... Langweilig und unkreativ. Die normalen Operationen in BF1 gaben einem noch abwechslungsreiche Schlachten mit einem richtigen Kriegsgefühl.

    Die Karten sind meiner Meinung nach auch etwas zu groß geraten, wodurch es sich oft bei 64 Spielern so anfühlt als ob man ca. mit 1-2 Trupps pro Team spielen würde. So große Karten sind natürlich nicht übel für Sniper, für alle anderen Klassen ist es eben der Wandersimulator mit Bleivergiftungsgefahr.

    Es gibt noch viele weitere Änderungen wie das Markieren oder die Munitionsknappheit, die man so oder so finden kann aber fast alle gewöhnungsbedürftig sind.

    DIe Charakteranpassung ist zwar ganz gut gemacht, aber eigentlich nichts was mich sonderlich interessiert. Ich habe nur noch nicht herausgefunden wo denn diese Spezialmissionen für die vielen fehlenden Kleidungsstücke sein sollen, entweder bin ich zu blöd die zu finden oder die kommen auch erst später. Vlt. heist Spezialmission bei EA auch dass ich in den Shop gehen und mir dort alles kaufen soll wer weiß ;)

    Aber immerhin gibt es wenigstens ein Paar Dinge die aus BF1 übernommen wurden, z.B. dass ewige laden beim Beenden eines Spieles, dass meistens länger dauert als wenn man einfach das Spiel neustarten würde, vorausgesetzt es funktioniert überhaupt... Oder die öden Kriegsgeschichten von denen nicht einmal alle zum release Spielbar sind.... aber vielleicht auch besser so.

    Vlt. freunde ich mich mit der Zeit ja noch mit diesem Spiel an, sodass ich es vlt. hin und wieder spielen werde, wobei ich bezweifel dass es die nächster Speicherplatzknappheit überleben wird, auf jeden Fall trauere ich meinen 60€ jetzt schon hinterher.    … Expand
  48. 1vtheworld
    Dec 2, 2018
    3
    Just lazy.

    Buggy glitch filled mess with only the guise of having any content. The MP progression a joke that on the surface looks pretty standard until you notice that it'll have you unlocking the same 2 camo schemes for each individual part of each weapon, again and again. There aren't even traditional nation/side specific weapons, everyone shares the same weapon "pool" to    Just lazy.

    Buggy glitch filled mess with only the guise of having any content. The MP progression a joke that on the surface looks pretty standard until you notice that it'll have you unlocking the same 2 camo schemes for each individual part of each weapon, again and again. There aren't even traditional nation/side specific weapons, everyone shares the same weapon "pool" to artificially pad out the progression trees. It just dumb to see and immersion breaking. There is only a small selection of maps that get old very fast, especially the open maps that are dominated by snipers and bombers.

    Then theres the store, which while it doesn't include real money element at the minute (obv to avoid neg reviews by game critics at launch) it is clear that they will be there, and as egregious as expected. With the "cosmetic" items currently available with in-game points taking a stupid amount of time to grind for. I've been playing since early access and have just 7500c which is not enough to buy anything bar some face paint. Especially bad when considering the same in-game credits are used for upgrading/progressing vehicles and weapons. It's pretty obvious that the inclusion of different genders/ethnicities for character customization is nothing more than fuel for the cosmetic store, not some noble steps toward "progressiveness".

    The single player is bad. Intolerable writing, forgettable characters and tone deaf Michael Bay style nonsense, with no grounding in historical events. The premise of "Rich untold stories" is laughable, especially when it becomes apparent that they're just stuffed into future conquest maps with some objectives dotted about, that have been held back for the first free "DLC" I'm sure. There are only 3 missions (one is locked until the 4th) Ai is dumb and its just not fun to play, especially on harder difficulties.

    The list goes on and on...

    Not worth the entry price, very lazy effort.    … Expand
  49. iam3stars
    Dec 16, 2018
    3
    Я не понимаю почему все ставят плохие оценки и почитав их хотел бы обсудить. Минусы в конце.

    1) Касается всех русскоязычных (нет ссср) вы уважаемые сначала историю почитайте во первых сейчас в игре 40 года а великая отечественная началась в 41 году тогда и ссср появилось. И понимайте разницу есть великая отечественная а есть 2 мировая и там не только 2 страны воевали. 2) Феминизм. Всех    Я не понимаю почему все ставят плохие оценки и почитав их хотел бы обсудить. Минусы в конце.

    1) Касается всех русскоязычных (нет ссср) вы уважаемые сначала историю почитайте во первых сейчас в игре 40 года а великая отечественная началась в 41 году тогда и ссср появилось. И понимайте разницу есть великая отечественная а есть 2 мировая и там не только 2 страны воевали.
    2) Феминизм. Всех бесит что в игре куча женщин, что касается онлайн. боже мой вас никто за женщину играть не заставляет нет желания играйте за мужика. Ну а в сюжетки сказать ничего не могу не играл, никогда ради сюжета Battlefield не брал. в большинстве случаев онлайн я даже не задумывался кто рядом со мной воюет.
    Из минусов
    Включил конкурента батлы дабы проверить как у них дела и удивился. Люди которые умудряются каждый год батлу выпускать ( я знаю что компании разные делают) выглядит в десятки раз круче в плане графики. Они даже над обычным меню заморочились
    Итог:
    . Она не лучше BF3 и BF 4 Но в разы круче чем BF1. Вернитесь уже к временам BF 3-4    … Expand
  50. hiesh_morigan
    Dec 10, 2018
    3
    Хочется начать с того,что я люблю battlefield.Играл во все части франшизы и всегда получал удовольствие от игры,к сожалению выше сказанные слова не относятся к данной части.Этому способствует следующие причины:
    •1)Сюжет.Абсолютно бессмысленный,скучный и неинтересный,а все из за того,что DICE решили показать какие они талерантные(это я про историю с телкой «альпинисткой»).
    •2)Графика.Нет    Хочется начать с того,что я люблю battlefield.Играл во все части франшизы и всегда получал удовольствие от игры,к сожалению выше сказанные слова не относятся к данной части.Этому способствует следующие причины:
    •1)Сюжет.Абсолютно бессмысленный,скучный и неинтересный,а все из за того,что DICE решили показать какие они талерантные(это я про историю с телкой «альпинисткой»).
    •2)Графика.Нет нет графика здесь показывает хорошие результаты,не каждая игра в 2018 может показать такой уровень,но частицы по типу дождя,снега,песка,грязи которые летают во время игры в огромных количествах-это пиздец.Также я заметил тенденцию,что в последнее время разработчики с каждым разом меняют освещение,они пытаются сделать игру безумно яркой.
    •3)Оптимизация.Не то,что ждали люди.
    •4)Геймплей.    … Expand
  51. EbanatNatria542
    Jan 19, 2019
    3
    В этой игре хорошая графика, оружие и... И все.
    А так это просто поле где во время 2 мировой бегают афроамериканцы, фемки устраивают ЛГБТ парады и самое главное СТОНЫ.
    От блять, бегу я значит по снегу и слышу стоны девушек с одной стороны, потом с другой. Короче, это пиздец. Подойдет только графодрочерам. R.I.P Battlefield (Я НИЧЕГО НЕ ИМЕЮ ПРОТИВ АЗИАТОВ, АФРОАМЕРИКАНЦЕВ,    В этой игре хорошая графика, оружие и... И все.
    А так это просто поле где во время 2 мировой бегают афроамериканцы, фемки устраивают ЛГБТ парады и самое главное СТОНЫ.
    От блять, бегу я значит по снегу и слышу стоны девушек с одной стороны, потом с другой.
    Короче, это пиздец. Подойдет только графодрочерам.

    R.I.P Battlefield

    (Я НИЧЕГО НЕ ИМЕЮ ПРОТИВ АЗИАТОВ, АФРОАМЕРИКАНЦЕВ, ФЕМИНИЗМА, ЛГБТ СООБЩЕСТВА И Т.Д)    … Expand
  52. TheScort
    Nov 27, 2019
    3
    I did exactly what EA told me to do with this one - I didn't like it, so I didn't buy it! Launching for £45-50 here in the UK, I avoided it like the plague, and even in the months following release, where PSN had it for £30 quite a bit - I still refused to dip in.

    I'll not go over the reasons for giving Battlefield 5 (sorry Trevor Noah - I meant "Vee") a wide berth, as all fans of the    I did exactly what EA told me to do with this one - I didn't like it, so I didn't buy it! Launching for £45-50 here in the UK, I avoided it like the plague, and even in the months following release, where PSN had it for £30 quite a bit - I still refused to dip in.

    I'll not go over the reasons for giving Battlefield 5 (sorry Trevor Noah - I meant "Vee") a wide berth, as all fans of the series know exactly what turned most people off - I voted with my wallet this time!

    Then EA Access came along for £20.

    First game to download with my new 'EA slave pass' - BFV, a whopping 70 gigs, which subsequently needed to be deleted an re-downloaded, when half the menus failed to load, and I was greeted with just black screens most of the time!

    Eventually I jumped into my first few MP games - initial impressions were 'wow', this game looks and sounds amazing! Top marks on that front. Then I realise that owing to me joining the party late, pretty much everyone has much better kit - there were arty strikes, V2 bombs, and all sorts going on!!

    I grind away for match after match, unlocking pointless customizations for my chosen tool of death - wow, I now have a slightly green sight and handle.... erm, woop woop? I get a new pair of GI trousers; I get point to unlock specializations - that appear to have utterly no impact to the weapon whatsoever.

    My player rank over a couple of days in now in double digits, I have unlocked two or three weapons for certain classes, and used in-game currency (that I didn't pay for) to unlock some new support guns - feeling hard done by, as with the exception of one having a bigger belt of ammo - are exactly the same in in-game performance.

    When I finally take stock of the game, I realize, just how little there is too it - 9 MONTHS after release, there are still menus stating "Coming soon" - there's 3 or 4 sights per weapon, no grips, or stock customisations - in a word "limited". I appreciate this isn't BF3 or 4 with all the different points on a weapon to modify - but if Dice/EA are going to spin their narratives on WW2, they could have surly worked more weapon customisations in.

    And the GRIND! I know that these days, EA/Activision/Whoever are making their games in such a way, that purchasing their premium currency becomes the dangling carrot - the rationale they use is that you either spend your free time, or heard earned cash to advance. It just kicks you when you're down, if you're short on time and cannot commit to the grind to unlock the next thing. There seems to have been a huge jump in points needed between player/class/weapon ranks now I'm in double digits on player score.

    The game just feels completely unfinished to me, or at best, an expansion pass to Battlefield 1 - as combining these two titles would probably make one decent game - it's a bit like Hardline.

    As for one of the controversial bits - hearing women screaming in a WW2 battle, just dents what little immersion this game has; it gets to sounding like a drunken hen doo out on the town, and if anything is quite disrespectful to those who fought in the War.

    Battlefield 5 is the Star Wars version of a Battlefield game - if you are a true fan of the predecessors, avoid this game. OR if your curious, get it second hand for less than £20 or via the EA Access.

    It's a solid 3/10 game for this old BF fan.

    Some credentials out the way:

    Firstly, I'm a huge fan of the Battlefield games - the second (or third) PC game I purchased, was Battlefield 1942 - which I played online via 56k dial up (some BT gaming service iirc) or at LAN parties.

    For 1942, I purchased all the expansion passes, and when the epic fan-made Desert Combat came along, I spent many hours gaming with a slightly improved 1MB/s NTL 'broadband' connection.

    When Battlefield 2 came along - it was (and probably still is) the pinnacle of the series for me, and I spent a huge amount of time on it - but never once earned a Purple Heart, which I was quite proud of - considering my play style is to get right into the action (forget that K/D ratio rubbish!). I purchased the expansions, and played a great deal of fan made conversions - even running a server with a clan for a while.

    I skipped 2142, as I was firmly in the camp that the futuristic setting, had no place in Battlefield :-P I then jumped ship to consoles, and although I missed the first iteration of Battlefield on the 360 - I picked the series up again with Bad Company; whilst a bit of a deviation to what I had been used to - it was a welcome return.

    Bad Company 2 was another pinnacle for me - and to this day, hotly contests the fond memories I have of Battlefield 2 on the PC. Battlefield 3 was also a great addition to the series, and had some utterly stunning single player experienced.

    Battlefield 4 - pretty meh, nothing worth remembering, and Battlefield 1 just felt incomplete - though the SP tank missions were ace!    … Expand
  53. ToshLichev
    May 28, 2021
    3
    Even in its "complete" state Battlefield V is a disaster.

    Let's get the positive out of the way. The multiplayer is decent, nothing of note, the big battles can feel epic but way too often you end up stranded on the huge map having to run to the battlefield. Nothing to write home about but I could see how someone could enjoy it. And now the Single Player. In my 13 years of active    Even in its "complete" state Battlefield V is a disaster.

    Let's get the positive out of the way. The multiplayer is decent, nothing of note, the big battles can feel epic but way too often you end up stranded on the huge map having to run to the battlefield. Nothing to write home about but I could see how someone could enjoy it.

    And now the Single Player. In my 13 years of active gaming I have never played a worse single player and that is if you can even consider this **** a single player campaign. There are only a few mini-stories which could easily be completed in about 2 hours if it wasn't for the absurdly cheap difficulty. For some reason the single player is incredibly stealth focused which makes no sense since the gameplay doesn't offer a single stealth mechanic. You are always underpowered, the AI eats bullets for breakfast and you go down in 5 hits max. You essentially have to resort to cheating the game itself to save yourself from the terrible gameplay. There are also somehow tons of bugs.

    But even if all of that could be fixed it wouldn't really matter because what we have here are 4 laughably overproduced, bland, generic, boring, uninspired and at times painfully preachy stories which fail at every aspect of telling a story.

    Overall, never consider playing this. Ever.    … Expand
  54. Tva_12
    Jun 13, 2019
    3
    Як ви могли прогнутися під фемінізм?
    Де "советская кампанія"? Мало того що ви зіпсували достовірність історії то ви добавили жіночих персонажів в ігру про воєнні часи серйозно. Поставив 3 по одній причині бателрояль принципі непоганий режим з крутою стрільбою . Будь ласка неповторіть цей позор.    Як ви могли прогнутися під фемінізм?
    Де "советская кампанія"? Мало того що ви зіпсували достовірність історії то ви добавили жіночих персонажів в ігру про воєнні часи серйозно. Поставив 3 по одній причині бателрояль принципі непоганий режим з крутою стрільбою . Будь ласка неповторіть цей позор.
  55. Demox_Char
    Aug 15, 2019
    3
    Сначала мне всё нравилось, но потом мне наскучило это вообще просто скучный шутер не динамичный шутер который мне быстро наскучил. Теперь по поводу Королевской битвы я честен буду не играл да и зачем покупать игру ради только Королевской битвы за кучу денег не стоит те кто играет в bf 1 не покупайте bf5 смысла нету.Сначала мне всё нравилось, но потом мне наскучило это вообще просто скучный шутер не динамичный шутер который мне быстро наскучил. Теперь по поводу Королевской битвы я честен буду не играл да и зачем покупать игру ради только Королевской битвы за кучу денег не стоит те кто играет в bf 1 не покупайте bf5 смысла нету.
  56. yesnowhocares
    Sep 30, 2019
    3
    we were so f****** hyped about a ww2 turns out it started off with almost no weapons, few maps, **** campaign and a company forcing you to buy useless skins i would've gave it a 0 if it had bad graphics
  57. Chempion1
    Mar 6, 2023
    3
    Чо то недавно "поиграл" в Battlefield 2042 и вспомнил про многострадальный Battlefield V. А многострадальный он вот почему. Буду писать только про "сюжетный" режим, так как о мультиплеере у 100 человек будет 101 мнение.
    Начну с позитивного.
    Игра невероятно красива и выжимает из PS4 если не все соки, то точно многие. Стрельба великолепна, как всегда, я полагаю. Всё. Теперь ужасы.    Чо то недавно "поиграл" в Battlefield 2042 и вспомнил про многострадальный Battlefield V. А многострадальный он вот почему. Буду писать только про "сюжетный" режим, так как о мультиплеере у 100 человек будет 101 мнение.
    Начну с позитивного.
    Игра невероятно красива и выжимает из PS4 если не все соки, то точно многие.
    Стрельба великолепна, как всегда, я полагаю.
    Всё.
    Теперь ужасы.
    Короче это очередная сказка про то как американские "союзнички" "воевали" с немцами. При том в DICE до сих пор уверены, что вторая мировая война шла в африке, норвегии, на западе франции, да где угодно кроме СССР. Ребята, если не знаете, то 95% всех боёв этой войны проходили на территории СССР и восточной европы, при этом практически без прямого участия этих самых стран"союзников". Но сказка на то и сказка.
    В сюжете идет прямое унижение солдат вермахта. Их уничтожают просто взглядом. Самая унизительная для немцев история называется "Аврова". В ней 20и летняя девочка, 160 см ростом и весом в 50 кг, уничтожает собственноручно, ну наверное батальон фашистов. И нет, не из снайперской винтовки или минируя жд пути, а тупо из пулемётов, автоматов и т. д. Немцы показаны тупыми имбецылами, не способными противостоять девчонке не физически не умственно. Позор.
    Я честно не знал, что в армии франции воевали сплошь жители африканских колоний, которые по знанию французского языка Мольера за пояс заткнут. А ещё я узнал, что французские нeгpы это самые добрые, отзывчивые и романтичные существа на Земле.
    Полный маразм.
    Да, если кто не знал, то по мнению DICE, в разведчики-диверсанты берут только слабоумных дебилов, после отсидки в тюрьме.
    Не обошлось и без истории за нацистов. "Союзники" сейчас вроде как. Но их предусмотрительно усадили в танк и стрелять заставили по машинам. Никаких живописных убийств солдат американцев не будет, а зря. Да, за эту миссию даже ачивку не дают!
    Все четыре истории это легенды "суперсолдат" которые уничтожают как цыплят немецкий рейх. Полный отстой. И ведь это не какой то Wolfenstein, где всё подаётся с юмором и мистикой. В Battlefield V всё это дерьмо рассказывается как исторические материалы
    Теперь о самой игре.
    Загрузки. Загрузки по 3 минуты, тупые монологи по 5-7 минут которые нельзя перемотать. DICE зачем всё это.
    Короче, после юморных Battlefield: Bad Company 1 и 2, после шикарной Battlefield 3, после глупой, но развесёлой Battlefield 1, мы получили лживую, тупую, не интересную историю западных "солдат". Историю которую не дают даже перемотать. Промывка мозгов, унижение немецкого народа (да нацисты были осуждены, но это не делает их тупыми хомячками), преувеличение значения западных войск в событиях второй мировой, для меня Великой Отечественной Войне, вот, что такое "сюжет" Battlefield V!
    Не советую играть в сюжет никому.    … Expand
  58. Stormking80
    Nov 8, 2019
    3
    this game is a pice of garbage , but we all have hope that game will be returning in the pacific update
  59. GGNEBYDET
    Mar 27, 2020
    3
    Thank you EA,DICE and left-liberal political movement in Sweden. Battlefield was a best shooter,but they ruined the game. Black man in Poland....
  60. mollycoddle
    Apr 1, 2020
    3
    Худшее дерьмо, в которое я играл. Единственное, что в этой игре хорошо сделано, это звук и стрельба. В остальном кал.
  61. gygygygygy
    Jul 22, 2021
    3
    одним словом , говно , дезинфа про операцию "гомора"
    баги , боже , сколько же там багов
  62. 7Lemon
    Jun 24, 2020
    3
    Why is history necessary if it is not tolerant - this is tagline of this game
  63. Cdr1978
    Dec 5, 2020
    3
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Only 5 missions in the game it seems to be a rush game battlefield 1 was better… Expand
  64. Axelle_1
    Dec 12, 2021
    3
    1
    Shooting get's a big downgrade from BF4, year after year it get's more cas
  65. Milos_Crnac
    Sep 24, 2021
    3
    Most mediocre game i ever played. I bought BF5 after it got it's last update in hope for similar experience i had in BF1, one of my top 5 favorite games and best shooters i ever played. When i first started playing the game, my first impressions were pretty good. I played BF1 quite lot and when i went to BF5, i really felt like i went from WW1 to WW2, and that feeling was soo good. Sadly,Most mediocre game i ever played. I bought BF5 after it got it's last update in hope for similar experience i had in BF1, one of my top 5 favorite games and best shooters i ever played. When i first started playing the game, my first impressions were pretty good. I played BF1 quite lot and when i went to BF5, i really felt like i went from WW1 to WW2, and that feeling was soo good. Sadly, it is one of few good feeling i had with this game. Before i started playing multiplayer, i finished singleplayer which felt pretty meh. Stories felt uninspired and they really focused too much on stealth. I didn't had much interest in main characters and didn't felt much towards them. Now the multiplayer. Dice has made some improvements that lacked in BF1. For example, spotting flare is now fair, every medic can revive you and heal you, every support has repair tool and ammo, being in squad is now much fun and dependable and the thing i like the most in BF5 and wish is in the BF1, the level of customization. You can customize your weapon how ever you want, it can have lower recoil or better hip fire, faster reload speed or movement speed while ads... These are the few things i like about BF5, but sadly, there are a lot more that i dislike. To start first, the bad visibility and ability to become one with environment on some maps like twisted steel. It happens very often to get shot by i person who i would never see if not for death cam. Sometimes when i shoot the enemy, i lose him because his player skin is very similar to what's behind him, tho. this is mostly due to me being blind like mole rat, but still, not fun. 2nd thing i hate most in BF5 is it's TTK/TTD. For some reason, i really feel like i die faster than i can kill somebody. I know it's me being bad, but sometimes it takes me 1 magazine to take out one enemy, but then comes other guy from 3 kilometers away from me and all he does is one short burst and BAM, i am dead. Sometimes, i don't even have time to react, and this barely ever happened to me in BF1. Maps in BF5 are also meh. There are 19 maps in the game, BF1 had 29. Those 19 maps can make game less interesting over time. They look graphicly beautiful, some of them are really big, but lots of them feel like they are missing something, and i have no idea what exactly. It's like, they have open parts, but when someone starts shooting at you, 4/10 times you will be able to find a place to hide from gunfire. Some maps include parts where planes spawn directly on the ground, and they need time to fly of the ground. In theory, it's pretty cool, but in practice it leads to toxic experience where some noob will spent entire round waiting for plane to spawn and then blowing it up with bazooka and getting cheap kill. Talking about planes, they are one of the most annoying things in the game, being able to clear entire objectives from infantry giving great reward to those who know how to use them. Not even tanks are safe from them cause some planes are able one shot heavy tanks like tiger on full health, and even if they miss you, they can just go back to plane station and rearm themselves and return to kill you, and you can't do anything about it, unless you pick Anti aircraft tanks, but then you won't be able to do anything against other tanks. But to be fair, infantry players have pretty strong weapons that can also one shot planes. Few more things that i don't like is Dice's decision to remove ability to spot players manually and switch team. You can now spot players by suppressing them or spotting them with gadgets and i can understand why they did that, but i can't understand why they removed team switch. BF5, just like every other multiplayer FPS, has microtransactions that are pretty similar to fortnite. Some hate it, but i personally really like it. You can buy stuff with BF coings which are something similar to fortnite V Bucks. You can buy them, or even get them by grinding and doing some small weekly missions, and when you complete them, you get 100 of those coins, which is barely anything. With those coins, you can choose what do you want to buy, and there are no loot boxes. For me, this is pretty fair and i have nothing against it. You don't any advantage from buying anything from store, things there are purely cosmetic. Overall, i am not having much fun in this game, and i am sad for that. I really try hard to be good at this game, but i just can't. In BF1 i can easily get 20 kill when i am playing casual or even joking around, but in BF5, i really need to start thinking what am i doing to have 20/9 kd. Sometimes it's hard to believe this game is AAA, after 2 years since it launched, it still had bugs that affect the gameplay, tho. it is rare to see your game crash, but it can still happend. If you want to by this game, i would not recommend you to, unless it's price is bellow 5 dollars. It's really a disappointment, specially not seeing eastern front.… Expand
  66. William_Trigos
    May 14, 2023
    3
    After the success of BF1, they release BFV where today there are bugs in the campaign, the multiplayer leaves a lot to be desired

    It's a shame that one of my favorite franchises is being killed by its own creators
  67. yellow22
    May 9, 2021
    3
    I spent several hours in this game. I will compare this game with BF1. To put it crudely, this game feels very cheap, the gameplay, the weapons, the hit markers, the little bugs and graphics glitches you experience.... It just doesn't feel finished. The soundtrack doesn't fit, there is just no WW2 feeling, in BF1 I felt like I was just in the war, I have never had such a good feeling in aI spent several hours in this game. I will compare this game with BF1. To put it crudely, this game feels very cheap, the gameplay, the weapons, the hit markers, the little bugs and graphics glitches you experience.... It just doesn't feel finished. The soundtrack doesn't fit, there is just no WW2 feeling, in BF1 I felt like I was just in the war, I have never had such a good feeling in a game like BF1. The vehicles are horrible to drive. There are too few weapons. And there is a lot of shouting around, it does not make the game better.… Expand
  68. efeozburuntr
    Aug 26, 2021
    3
    Disgraceful story mode -7 points. There was no USSR -1 point. Good online +1 point
  69. Timperator
    Jan 4, 2022
    3
    04.01.2022 - Connection Problems. Servers have problems to find enough Players.
  70. Potet69
    Jun 6, 2023
    3
    Play BF1 instead.‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎
  71. blaakaffe
    Nov 23, 2018
    2
    Battlefield V lacks contents and wwII atmosphere. Also it disconnects a lot as well
  72. leMMingSlayeR
    Jan 6, 2019
    2
    Against all the negative reviews, I purchased this game anyway. I like the Battlefield series, but this one is the worst so far. It really feels like DICE and EA are just phoning it in with this installment. I historically play Battlefield games first for the single-player campaign and then multiplayer.

    This campaign is nearly broken. It is riddled with texture pop-in, assets    Against all the negative reviews, I purchased this game anyway. I like the Battlefield series, but this one is the worst so far. It really feels like DICE and EA are just phoning it in with this installment. I historically play Battlefield games first for the single-player campaign and then multiplayer.

    This campaign is nearly broken. It is riddled with texture pop-in, assets clipping down straight through the floor and disappearing, and many other graphical glitches. The cutscenes regularly freeze entirely for 10 seconds or so, making me fear that the game has completely crashed. I come to expect these things with PC games, but for a console release from a "AAA" developer and publisher this is inexcusable.

    In addition to the graphical issues, the enemy AI is fundamentally broken. Enemies regularly stand facing away from me and do not even respond when shot, seemingly stuck in their animation. At other times an attacking enemy will for no reason simply stop, turn around and begin running in another direction shooting at imaginary other players who aren't even there.

    Lastly, the "artistic" license that DICE has taken with this "historical" shooter. I have always been very interested in WWII history and have watched nearly every documentary on the time period. It was a turning point in the way the countries of the world see each other, a time of great innovation and technological achievement, and above all else a time when nearly every free person in the world joined in a fight against a true evil. This evil had a name, and a face. The Nazi party, led by Adolph Hitler, nearly destroyed the world. And yet, in this "historical" shooter about world war II, the word "Nazi", the iconography of the Nazi party (i.e. swastikas, eagles, images of "Der Fuhror", etc...) are completely absent from the game, presumably not to trigger anyone who is uncomfortable with those kinds of things. Pandering to this audience does nothing to benefit our society, and censoring history, even in forms of entertainment, for the sake of someone's emotions is just silly.

    Not to mention the "creative" license that gives credit to the sabotage of a German heavy water storage facility to a fictional pair of women, while not even acknowledging the real men who died IN REAL LIFE making sure that Nazi Germany never developed a nuclear weapon.

    With all these issues, the game is by far the most disappointing Battlefield game I have ever played, and based on this experience I will definitely not be purchasing the next installment, if there is one.    … Expand
  73. jason36lg
    Nov 20, 2018
    2
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I want to Cry.. I want my money back. This does not feel like WW2 for a minute. It feels like utter Dog Poop! It plays Awfull. When I saw Beta I thought not buying that crap, Then I saw Rotterdam map and thought looks great I'm buying. Wish I listened to my GUT.. sound audio crap, graphics are crap nothing compared to BF1, Gameplay crap. I will sell my BF5 account £10 if I could...Everything that warrants 0 score is warranted by BF5. COD WW2 was crap. This Is worse in every department.… Expand
  74. Chronos1
    Nov 22, 2018
    2
    really really really wanted to like this game.. but it's just nowhere near as good as BF4 or even BF1.. such a shame really.
  75. quidam
    Sep 3, 2019
    2
    I don't really care about all of the complaints about 'SJW' and 'a woman did what?' (watch out, fellas: your misogynism is showing) because it has exactly jack to do with gameplay. And isn't gameplay why you actually BUY the game? Well, at least it's why I do. Battlefield (and EA) have been on a downhill slide with this franchise since BF4. BF3 was the peak. After Visceral's BF:H (cops &I don't really care about all of the complaints about 'SJW' and 'a woman did what?' (watch out, fellas: your misogynism is showing) because it has exactly jack to do with gameplay. And isn't gameplay why you actually BUY the game? Well, at least it's why I do. Battlefield (and EA) have been on a downhill slide with this franchise since BF4. BF3 was the peak. After Visceral's BF:H (cops & robbers? really?) and then DICE seemingly reskinning BF:H to reboot SW:Battlefront, was it really surprising that BF1 was as bad as it was? And now BF5 just throws it all in the crapper.

    Nearly everything that made the mechanics work well in BF3 & 4 were pitched. Anything resembling progression is gone, replaced by skins? Multiplayer is a joke. 4-person squads? In a game that support 32 to a side? I need to unfriend a bunch of people because in a PS party of 8 people, we're not getting into the same squad. Frack if we're lucky to get into the same game let alone on the same side — it's ridiculous! previous Battlefields at least understood the complexities of managing large teams and tried to give you the tools to do it: ability to have separate audio chat for teams and squads; separate squads in PS4 parties would still typically join onto the same side; ability to change sides if balancing got messed up; enemy marking that actually worked; etc.

    After BF:H, I swore I wouldn't go all out on a BF preorder, and I didn't. I didn't even preorder BF5 at all — I bought the disc in the discount bin at GameStop and I'm glad I didn't pay more than that.

    This is probably my last Battlefield. It's just a shame that they not only forgot what made BF great, but they stopped listening to the paying fans that helped build the franchise.

    It's ok. I've got RDR2/RDO and there's a ton of F2P games that don't have the stupid buggy-ness that BF5 has (getting sniped through walls in houses you're not even touching, getting sniped with LMGs, stupid spawn points that make no sense, FUBARd medics that reload their weapons instead of reviving, etc.) and have behavior that just makes sense (how many times do you have no idea why you died in BF5?)    … Expand
  76. maxtomax
    Dec 18, 2019
    2
    Although the amount of content (maps) is quite low, it had a very good gameplay - the guns felt great to shoot. However, they completely changed how guns and vehicles behave in the latest patch, to cater to absolute beginners. This has completely ruined the game, it is not fun at all any more.

    Furthermore, they silently added the aimbot functionality on consoles (a really heavy-handed    Although the amount of content (maps) is quite low, it had a very good gameplay - the guns felt great to shoot. However, they completely changed how guns and vehicles behave in the latest patch, to cater to absolute beginners. This has completely ruined the game, it is not fun at all any more.

    Furthermore, they silently added the aimbot functionality on consoles (a really heavy-handed auto aim assistance) as well as auto 3D spotting of opponents (including through smoke, foliage, walls...). The game is an absolute mess now.    … Expand
  77. Bavman777
    Jan 2, 2019
    2
    I felt like giving a 0 because this is an insult to history.
    I have family members who have fought in WW2 and i feel you dishonour their legacy by distorting the truth.
    If you had branded the game as an alt universe, I could accept that, but you mix fact with fiction and narrate the story as though its truth. I believe you've insulted your user base. I know the effort it takes to    I felt like giving a 0 because this is an insult to history.
    I have family members who have fought in WW2 and i feel you dishonour their legacy by distorting the truth.
    If you had branded the game as an alt universe, I could accept that, but you mix fact with fiction and narrate the story as though its truth. I believe you've insulted your user base.
    I know the effort it takes to develop games so I give 1 point for that. The graphics look amazing and gameplay feels solid, so another point for that.
    I'll be returning the game.    … Expand
  78. KDaaee
    Nov 19, 2018
    2
    The game about ww2 without USSR. A lot of bugs. Tolerant vomit. Shame on you EA.
  79. Fire_Charizard
    Dec 26, 2018
    2
    This game is not to my liking at all. I brought it to give it a go and I’m not surprised I’m let down. Sticking to bf4 yet again for another 2 years. It gives such a distaste for any returning bf player. Also can’t ads with mmg or hmg yet in all the other bf games you can. Every time you deploy bipod your a snipers best friend. Such a stupid mechanic. Here’s to bf6 being modern...This game is not to my liking at all. I brought it to give it a go and I’m not surprised I’m let down. Sticking to bf4 yet again for another 2 years. It gives such a distaste for any returning bf player. Also can’t ads with mmg or hmg yet in all the other bf games you can. Every time you deploy bipod your a snipers best friend. Such a stupid mechanic. Here’s to bf6 being modern... hopefully they won’t ruin that. Better yet, just remaster bf3 ffs.… Expand
  80. Anturess
    Jul 2, 2019
    2
    the gameplay on tanks and aircraft is still a piece of **** lots of bugs. transparent players, dark screens and so on ...
  81. DBM2018
    Nov 17, 2018
    2
    The only redeeming quality about this game is that its graphics are technically impressive. Look, I loved BF1, but this ain't it. It's just not and it has very little to do with the external factors surrounding the game, the politics, etc. The UI is an eyesore and cluttered. The customization options are too much, and too much of low quality. The building mechanics feel tacked on and onlyThe only redeeming quality about this game is that its graphics are technically impressive. Look, I loved BF1, but this ain't it. It's just not and it has very little to do with the external factors surrounding the game, the politics, etc. The UI is an eyesore and cluttered. The customization options are too much, and too much of low quality. The building mechanics feel tacked on and only serve as a hindrance to having a good time. The maps feel lazy, uninspired, and in some cases poor revisions to BF1 maps. It doesn't feel like a WWII game. The combat, though similar of course to BF1, actually feels way less satisfying and fun. The aesthetic of the games character models and art styles in certain areas is just baffling to me. They really missed the mark with the whole overall presentation of this game. It's a shame because I typically really enjoy Battlefield games. It's also buggy and has a disappointing amount of content in terms of maps, diversity of maps, game modes, etc. Pass on this one and hope that Dice gets its sh** together for the next entry in the series.… Expand
  82. Langfinger
    Nov 15, 2018
    2
    This game had the full potential to be an epic game, but it made all the wrong decisions for all the wrong reasons. Company Greed and PC detroyed the WW2 setting beyond recognition. This is so very tragic.
    +2 points for the graphics and audio, which are very good.
  83. ClosedRange
    Nov 18, 2018
    2
    Ignoring all the past controversy, is this game fun? Answer: no. The game balance is terrible, as only two of the classes are worth playing. The content is poor, with large amounts just recycled from BF1, eg the guns. The gameplay just feels empty and lifeless somehow - there's no sense of a battle to the fights. The balance on the gamemodes like operations is unforgivable. The only thingIgnoring all the past controversy, is this game fun? Answer: no. The game balance is terrible, as only two of the classes are worth playing. The content is poor, with large amounts just recycled from BF1, eg the guns. The gameplay just feels empty and lifeless somehow - there's no sense of a battle to the fights. The balance on the gamemodes like operations is unforgivable. The only thing stopping me giving it a 0 is that the graphics are pretty good, even though performance is still bad even with top of the end kit. If you do decide to buy on PC, try to ask others with a similar spec if they can actually run it properly. As for the single player, I haven't finished all of them yet but so far the game just fails to capture any of the magic that bf1 had. I'm going to be selling my copy soon. I don't usually bother to review games but this one was such a disappointment that I just had to.… Expand
  84. Waikiki333
    Nov 19, 2018
    2
    Damn, not talking now about the game's historical inaccuracy, everybody knows it sucks. The stories shown in the game a incredibly boring. It is boring to play it.Really seems to me like it is a reskin of BF1. Too many bugs in online. The game is a SHAME! Don't buy it guys, just DON'T! I can't believe i am actually sayin it, but i think it's better to buy the new COD game, even tho i amDamn, not talking now about the game's historical inaccuracy, everybody knows it sucks. The stories shown in the game a incredibly boring. It is boring to play it.Really seems to me like it is a reskin of BF1. Too many bugs in online. The game is a SHAME! Don't buy it guys, just DON'T! I can't believe i am actually sayin it, but i think it's better to buy the new COD game, even tho i am not a fan of the COD franchise. Peace.… Expand
  85. ThisNikita
    Nov 23, 2018
    2
    сыграв за всю жизнь в большое количество игр я решил сделать обзор на эту игру Пойдём по порядку
    ПЛЮСЫ
    1 К удивлению качество этой игры очень хорошее для 2018 года 2 Хорошая балистика оружия из плюсов всё МИНУСЫ 1 Все сюжетные миссии созданы для фимистических тварей 2 Когда играешь в онлайне ВСЯ твоя команда состоит из женщин    сыграв за всю жизнь в большое количество игр я решил сделать обзор на эту игру Пойдём по порядку
    ПЛЮСЫ
    1 К удивлению качество этой игры очень хорошее для 2018 года
    2 Хорошая балистика оружия
    из плюсов всё
    МИНУСЫ
    1 Все сюжетные миссии созданы для фимистических тварей
    2 Когда играешь в онлайне ВСЯ твоя команда состоит из женщин
  86. ElfoBf
    Nov 23, 2018
    2
    I was like: Ok I don´t care about all the SJW stuff, It cannot be so bad.
    But after Played Multiplayer, I would love to have my money back and never again buy any game from DICE.
    Historical accuracy? FORGETT IT you are NOT Fighting in the 2WW. Some Women Fought in the war but you will find some sort of non binary Woman Soldier, the same kind of person who is not a man but wants to be...    I was like: Ok I don´t care about all the SJW stuff, It cannot be so bad.
    But after Played Multiplayer, I would love to have my money back and never again buy any game from DICE.
    Historical accuracy? FORGETT IT you are NOT Fighting in the 2WW. Some Women Fought in the war but you will find some sort of non binary Woman Soldier, the same kind of person who is not a man but wants to be...
    80% GREY its every where.
    Soldiers have NO FLAG or Country. you recognize them cause of the helmet. Both team looks same.
    Its a Paradise for Campers. hide behind a wall and wait for they to come or snipe from a hill, no one will see you. You cannot mark enemy players.
    NO USSR, NO JAPAN, NO ITALY. NO NAZI GERMANY LOL.
    US OR UK? LOL
    the most accurate is that France is not in the game and how LOL.
    The Narrator voice is annoying af is like DICE hired the guy of CoD Black OPs
    In The next Battlefield is still exists probably will not have losers , no one will lose, everybody will have a medal for participation.
    BFV is decaffeinated Shooter game for people who cares more about their feelings than about facts.
    If you still not buying this terrible bad game you are lucky wait until it costs 15 bucks then it will worth the money.    … Expand
  87. Gillburg
    Nov 30, 2018
    2
    Game is not good really, bought it played 12 hours and it's really lacking in content compared to the rest of the BF's
  88. PsychoDD
    Dec 1, 2018
    2
    2 points just for better shooting mechanics. Feels like copy paste from Battlefield 1 without any content. Modes and other features which should have been included in the base game.
  89. shanks21
    Dec 2, 2018
    2
    bland boring does not deliver should have never wasted my money DOWN WITH EA!!!!!
  90. darthvader123
    Jan 14, 2019
    2
    Partes Positivas:

    1 - Dificuldade 2 - Conteúdo adicional grátis 3 - Trilha Sonora 4 - Gun Play Partes Neutras 1 - Sistema de ''Atrito'' (Munição e vida). No geral o sistema é bem pensado porque aumenta a dificuldade do jogo, mas em contrapartida não é bem aplicado. 2 - Munição limitada para Veículos. Partindo do mesmo princípio do sistema de atrito, não é bem aplicado. Existem    Partes Positivas:

    1 - Dificuldade
    2 - Conteúdo adicional grátis
    3 - Trilha Sonora
    4 - Gun Play

    Partes Neutras

    1 - Sistema de ''Atrito'' (Munição e vida). No geral o sistema é bem pensado porque aumenta a dificuldade do jogo, mas em contrapartida não é bem aplicado.
    2 - Munição limitada para Veículos. Partindo do mesmo princípio do sistema de atrito, não é bem aplicado. Existem poucas áreas para reabastecimento nos mapas e como são destrutíveis, provavelmente você terá que sair do veículo para construir e correr o risco de morrer ou ter o veículo roubado.
    3 - Gráficos (PS4 Fat). Os gráficos do Battlefield V são um pouco inferiores aos do Battlefield 1 e Battlefield 4.

    Partes Negativas

    1 - Mapas. A maioria dos mapas valorizam muito a camperagem e não tem o feeling de segunda guerra.
    2 - Som no geral
    3 - Desafios. Na maioria dos casos, os desafios não contam o progresso e alguns desafios são um pouco difíceis de se concluir.
    4 - Tanques. Muito frágeis e lerdos. Pouco splash damage. O pior de tudo é que ao avançar, você praticamente morre todas as vezes por conta da lerdeza e por não poder reparar ele até 100%.
    5 - Visibilidade
    6 - Campanha totalmente curta e sem precisão histórica (exceto a ''The Last Tiger'')
    7 - Pouco conteúdo no lançamento. Cortaram muitas coisas que deviam estar no jogo final para lançarem depois como ''Conteúdo Bônus''. Um exemplo disso é o mapa ''Panzerstorm''
    8 - Nenhuma batalha emblemática
    9 - Muitas coisas foram recicladas do Battlefield 1
    10 - Vários e vários bugs. Alguns exemplos são o carregamento infinito, ficar preso ao chão, cair do mapa, dificuldade para usar a aba de reforços, fortificações bugadas, designações não contam o progresso, animação de reviver bugada, entre outros.
    11 - Netcode bugado. Bem parecido com o do Battlefield 4 no seu início
    12 - Classes sem balanceio nenhum. Assalto tem armas boas para qualquer distância, suportes ficam deitados a partida inteira por causa dos bipés que ja vem equipados na arma, médicos não podem bater de frente e snipers (única classe que pode spotar) tem equipamentos péssimos para teamplay
    13 - Mapas favorecem muito a camperagem. Junto com a visibilidade péssima, isso é bem chato.

    Contudo, minha nota é 2/10    … Expand
  91. RussianGerman
    Dec 5, 2018
    2
    Какого хуя, ребята? Ганнерсайд - 2 операции, в сумме 46 подготовленных диверсантов. 20 солдат не добрались, 20 убили. 20, Карл, 20! Операция была проведена успешно благодаря усилиям 6 диверсантам. Что же говорит игра? Какая-то девка лет 19-20 уничтожила цех по производству тяжёлой воды в одну каску! Это неуважение к ветеранам, неуважение ко всем тем 40 погибшим солдатам! Вы им расскажите,Какого хуя, ребята? Ганнерсайд - 2 операции, в сумме 46 подготовленных диверсантов. 20 солдат не добрались, 20 убили. 20, Карл, 20! Операция была проведена успешно благодаря усилиям 6 диверсантам. Что же говорит игра? Какая-то девка лет 19-20 уничтожила цех по производству тяжёлой воды в одну каску! Это неуважение к ветеранам, неуважение ко всем тем 40 погибшим солдатам! Вы им расскажите, что они были недостаточно подготовлены, чтобы уничтожить целый цех! Расскажите, что это смогла выполнить одна-единственная девка!
    Этот пример далеко не единственный, к сожалению.
    В игре отсутствует кампания СССР. Это дикость! Страна, понёсшая наибольший ущерб в войне, отсутствует в игре! Лично у меня воевало 2 прадеда - один из них, к сожалению, погиб на фронте. Второй дожил до нашего времени, и слава Богу. Я нахожу оскорблением их памяти отсутствие сюжетной кампании, показывающей их светлые подвиги!
    И, риторический вопрос - кто больше оскорблён, кого больше - феминисток, поехавших от безнаказанности, или потомков Ветеранов войны?
    Будущие поколения могут не узнать настоящую историю, не будут читать книги, статьи, и прочее. Феминизм и жажда "толерантности" превратилась в обратную дискриминацию. Принижены заслуги великих бойцов, несомненно, спасших наш, и без того хрупкий, мир.

    2/10 - 1-за графику, 1-за аудиоэффекты. Стыд и срам вам, DICE.    … Expand
  92. Willfred
    Dec 5, 2018
    2
    EarlyAccess games BF 5 makes me feel like I'm playing early access FTP PTW shooter from indie-dev studio. Not enough company coins even to upgrade all vehicles. Bugs are basically everywhere and support don't really care, I can not get Tiger skin coz of bugs. The game community is so toxic, it's like in Warface or dota2. A lot of retards can jump in your artillery truck and drive u out ofEarlyAccess games BF 5 makes me feel like I'm playing early access FTP PTW shooter from indie-dev studio. Not enough company coins even to upgrade all vehicles. Bugs are basically everywhere and support don't really care, I can not get Tiger skin coz of bugs. The game community is so toxic, it's like in Warface or dota2. A lot of retards can jump in your artillery truck and drive u out of the map or directly to the objectives, or just ram the enemy tank. Wanna some medicine or ammo? U better re-deploy yourself, it will be much faster. Why da hell I cannot play MAN as a pilot? You can play women - ok, no problem, if it is not a requirement.
    I like guns mechanic in the game. I bet that this game will be a great game.... a few years later... when bugs will be fixed and content will be added.    … Expand
  93. Ray87
    Dec 8, 2018
    2
    Feels like the next installment of Call Of Duty than a Battlefield series game. Devs actively promote close quarter combat overall with design elements that are uncharacteristically geared towards chaos and punish users who want to coordinate and plan with teammates. If it wasn't for how beautiful some of these maps were I would give it a zero.
  94. MAFIOZOS3
    Dec 9, 2018
    2
    This is the worse battlefield game that i have ever played!
    Very few maps, weapons and a lot of lagging. It is an uncomplete game next time i prefare to pay for a season pass and to be completed than to have a game like this.
  95. MadFlip
    Dec 29, 2018
    2
    Game shows that feminism won WW2
    -no atmosphere
    -bad gameplay
    -stupid customization
    -boring single player
    im bf fan for 10 years
    but this year ill play cod bo 4....its much better
  96. hollywoodtom
    Jan 10, 2019
    2
    I dont care about the questions of historical accuracy nore am I looking for a true simulator. I do however want a BATTLEFIELD game. I think the mechanics are garbage for a flagship game in a franchise I have loved.

    Examples, I have fallen through the world too many times to count, weapon balance is strange ( it takes freak show amounts of bullets with LMG to kill someone??? when they    I dont care about the questions of historical accuracy nore am I looking for a true simulator. I do however want a BATTLEFIELD game. I think the mechanics are garbage for a flagship game in a franchise I have loved.

    Examples,
    I have fallen through the world too many times to count, weapon balance is strange ( it takes freak show amounts of bullets with LMG to kill someone??? when they ace you with an assault rifle ) , I die within steps of spawn OFTEN, the weapons options and mods are minimal. The team dynamic is also dead. It feels like EA was finally successful in getting enough new gamers to the franchise , but that has in my eyes eliminated the teamwork necessary to win that made BF4 fun. Also, in BF4 you had to be good to be a sniper, understand bullet drops for different guns, in this game they appear to have eliminated bullet drop, sniping is easy, and therefore entire squads are ALL snipers!!!! It feels like an arcade game, not a battlefield game.

    They killed suppression! Suppression is what made the game interesting and prevent fake ass run and gun!

    If you like the game good for you, but if you are a BF player, I suggest waiting to buy the game until they make some critical changes.    … Expand
  97. CryNasty
    Jan 29, 2019
    2
    WW II without USSR? But with a lot of women? Bull***!
    Will never buy any Battlefield game.
  98. TheGuyFromEarth
    Mar 28, 2019
    2
    Это капец. Как так фигово можно было сделать батлу? Здесь все очень плохо. АБСОЛЮТНО
    ДИЗАЙН КАРТ - ПЛОХО ГРАФИКА - ПЛОХО КОНТЕНТ ВНУТРИИГРОВОЙ - ПЛОХО, НИЧЕГО НЕ ДОБАВЛЯЮТ!
    Единственное, что даёт этой игре - нормальная стрельба и ттк.    Это капец. Как так фигово можно было сделать батлу? Здесь все очень плохо. АБСОЛЮТНО
    ДИЗАЙН КАРТ - ПЛОХО ГРАФИКА - ПЛОХО КОНТЕНТ ВНУТРИИГРОВОЙ - ПЛОХО, НИЧЕГО НЕ ДОБАВЛЯЮТ!

    Единственное, что даёт этой игре - нормальная стрельба и ттк.
  99. DFooRS
    May 17, 2019
    2
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Прошло несколько месяцев после релиза, и только сейчас, я решил поиграть в эту игру.
    О феминизме и прочем я слышал ране и был готов увидеть это в игре.

    Начнём с плюсов:

    Несмотря на женщину в главе Аврора и много других обсурдностей не только в этой миссии, компания мне понравилась.

    Музыкальное сопровождение - ВЕЛИКОЛЕПНОЕ. Да и не только Музыка, остальные звуки так же на высшем уровне. За звук просто 10/10!

    Сюжеты первых трёх глав интересные, но слишком какие-то... фантастические... Половина армии союзников, пришедших на спасение двух человек, Девушка-терминатор, упавшая с большой высоты, которая потом ещё и замёрзла легко убила немецкого солдата... Сюжет первых трёх кампаний на 4/10, но зато кампания последний тигр - великолепна! В конце даже хотелось плакать.
    И только за эту миссиюсжет сюжет игры заслуживает 8/10!

    Огорчил так же и геймплей первых трёх глав - один стелс. В последней кампании хоть войну показали.. Геймплейно кампания заслуживает 6/10

    Стрельба в игре великолепная, оружие правда чувствуется, самая лучшая стрельба из всех игр. 10/10

    Мултиплеер крайне огорчил... Слишком мало карт, за два дня достало играть и решил вернутся в шедевральный BF1.
    Помимо малого кол-ва карт, всего две фракции... Ни Британии, ни СССР в игре нет.
    Мултиплеер 2/10

    Атмосфера ужасная... Война не чувствуется... Все какое-то яркое, блестящее, ещё и бабы на фоне орут...
    В копейке была великолепная атмосфера: грязь, обломки, разрушения, мрачное небо - шедевр! В пятерке своей толерастией и цензурой все испортили. Ни одной свастики за игру, немецкий флаг вообще не имеет ничего общего с флагом рейха. На военной форме никаких нашивок и прочего - жесть.
    Даже в понравившейся мне главе последний тигр немцы отдают честь..
    Атмосфера просто 0/10 - война не чувствуется.

    За толерастию, цензуру и отсутсвие СССР, про который упоминали только во главе аврора лишь в контексте про разработку ядерного оружия, снижаю общую оценку на 4 балла.

    Итого: 2/10    … Expand
  100. Someguy12121
    May 18, 2019
    2
    Game has been out for nearly seven months and has only had one new map added. Customization options are no where near what was promised and many options that were present in Battlefield 1 that were great have been removed. Soldier customization is horrible and nearly all options make your soldier look like a fortnite reject. They added women into a WWII game because EA wanted to be SJWsGame has been out for nearly seven months and has only had one new map added. Customization options are no where near what was promised and many options that were present in Battlefield 1 that were great have been removed. Soldier customization is horrible and nearly all options make your soldier look like a fortnite reject. They added women into a WWII game because EA wanted to be SJWs and brake history, not only that but the female models they use all look like the person is a druggie. The game uses a live service which has led to the game lacking essential content to you interested and was added because all of the Battle Royale games are doing it.

    Firestorm which EAs attempt at making a Battle Royale for Battlefield is bad. The core concept of Battlefield does not fit into the mold for that type of game. Not to mention that you spend more time in lobbies than actually playing.

    The netcode is horrible and leads to one frame deaths and being shot around corners. The game still has many bugs and glitches which are super obvious that should not be getting passed Q&A but they actually have made the game worse with some patches as they brake something else. Unlike what they did in Battlefield 1 where they went with bi-monthly patch release to fix the game and resolve major issues, this time round they are waiting an entire month to fix things and in some cases have told players not to play the game at all if they are prone to seizures triggered by flashing or flickering lights as a severe glitch would cause flickering on a main screen. That glitch was not hit fixed or rushed and wasnt fixed for an entire month. EA has done nothing to but drag its feet and has forced DICE to produce a train wreck of a game.

    Only buy this game if you can get it for $20 USD or less because as it stands the game isnt even fully complete as some features arent even finished.
    Ive been playing games in the Battlefield franchise since 2009 and after spending over 400 hours with this game,Battlefield V is by far the worst in the entire franchise. Tons of server balance issues, lots of bugs, lack of customization options, extreme lack of content, bad single player, etc.

    Their are only two redeeming factors with BFV. 1) Soldier movement is the best in the franchise.
    2) Tanks now have ammo which must be resupplied at depots preventing tanks from sitting in one place the entire match.

    Again avoid this game unless you can get it cheap as paying full price is a huge rip off.    … Expand
prev
Page:

Awards & Rankings

7
#7 Most Discussed PS4 Game of 2018
39
#39 Most Shared PS4 Game of 2018

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
73

Mixed or average reviews - based on 23 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 15 out of 23
  2. Mixed: 8 out of 23
  3. Negative: 0 out of 23
  1. GameCritics
    Dec 27, 2018
    60
    In many ways, Battlefield V feels like a big step backwards for the franchise. The campaign is boring and frustrating, multiplayer is unbalanced, and bugs keep popping up in every mode to ruin the experience. The fortification system is a good shakeup, but the good it brings is tempered by the cumbersome and murky Grand Operations. With some patches, balance changes and bug squashing, BFV could be a fantastic game, but at the moment, this soldier needs to go back to basic training.
    Read full review
  2. Impulsegamer
    Dec 20, 2018
    76
    EA and DICE seem to have lost sight of what made this series a true contender for the FPS crown, and both the gameplay and the content are suffering as a result.
    Read full review
  3. Playstation Official Magazine UK
    Dec 12, 2018
    80
    Ripe with potential but riddled with problems, the new Battlefield will be brilliant six months from now. Right now, however, it’s merely a good shooter. [Issue#157, p.83]
See all critic reviews »