Call of Duty 3

 PlayStation 3
User Score
6.7

Mixed or average reviews- based on 135 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 61 out of 135
  2. Mixed: 49 out of 135
  3. Negative: 25 out of 135
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. [Anonyous]
    Feb 23, 2007
    4
    Pretty generic and linear, the ww2-genre is becoming repetitive and ... boring.
  2. BaronMonaco
    Jul 28, 2015
    7
    One of the first PS3 games, and somehow a little disappointment after playing Call Of Duty, the graphics were very nice at the time, with an honest 8-10 hours lenght campaign and I should congratulate Treyarch for the implementation of the Sixaxis options (that became pretty useless in the future).
    The game itself is pretty good, a classic WW2 FPS, but when compared to the previous    One of the first PS3 games, and somehow a little disappointment after playing Call Of Duty, the graphics were very nice at the time, with an honest 8-10 hours lenght campaign and I should congratulate Treyarch for the implementation of the Sixaxis options (that became pretty useless in the future).
    The game itself is pretty good, a classic WW2 FPS, but when compared to the previous episode, there are some obvious defaults to this third installment : the first one is the sound, how in hell did we passed from the near perfection in 2, to this plastic guns sound we have in 3, and to top it off, actors (in the french version at least, and given that this is one of the few games where you can't have the english voices if you didn't bought your game in a English speaking country I'll count it in my mark) are horribles not helped by very "cliche" dialogues that tried to copy "Saving Private Ryan" without an ounce of talent.

    The other biggest issue I have is concerning the level design, and the fake difficulty of the infinite respawn (at least 2 by levels), an old trick to the lazy developer, so yeah that gives some challenge, but that's purely unfair, you can kill 20 nazy in the same spot there will always be another to come like if Adolf was cloning them.... Simply lazy.

    And for that Call of Duty 3 comes as one of the worst installment in the franchise, in my opinion (alongside with Big Red One and Ghosts), if you want some WW2 COD, you'd better go with the number 2 or World At War.    … Expand
  3. MichiganerE
    Feb 24, 2014
    7
    The game is decent at best, and is one of my least favorite CoD games. The campaign isn't anything special or too memorable. It also has some heavily scripted events that takes away from the non-linear action of the the previous two games. But unlike the first two, it features driving sections, and four playable factions instead of three. The campaign overall is okay, the multiplayer onThe game is decent at best, and is one of my least favorite CoD games. The campaign isn't anything special or too memorable. It also has some heavily scripted events that takes away from the non-linear action of the the previous two games. But unlike the first two, it features driving sections, and four playable factions instead of three. The campaign overall is okay, the multiplayer on the other hand is a step backwards and a step forward, and here is why. Instead of the 8 player limit of the first two games, it supports up to 24 players. It also introduces a new game mode called War. It also introduces vechicles, sprinting, and classes. But it's a step backwards because it gets rid of the radar and it runs at 30 FPS instead of 60 FPS. Overall, decent game, 7/10.… Expand
  4. JamesP.
    May 26, 2007
    10
    This has to be one of the best games i have ever played in my life. i think combined with the graphics the ps3 can withstand it is the BEST.
  5. ChrisF.
    Apr 21, 2007
    10
    This game is superb, buy it
  6. AAAA
    Nov 18, 2006
    0
    I was a huge fan of RRT 3 who had solid "true 3D" graphics, good sound and the best economy/RR sim model ever made to day. You still find me under "Champion_Tycoon" in the multiplayer once in a while (I have not lost a multiplayer game in more than a year so strong players are highly welcome). I am also a long time fan of Sid Meier's games, some of which brought me many hours of I was a huge fan of RRT 3 who had solid "true 3D" graphics, good sound and the best economy/RR sim model ever made to day. You still find me under "Champion_Tycoon" in the multiplayer once in a while (I have not lost a multiplayer game in more than a year so strong players are highly welcome). I am also a long time fan of Sid Meier's games, some of which brought me many hours of relaxation over the past 15 years. That being said I expected 'Railroads' to come at least close to what RT3 was: a budget game. Oh boy was I wrong... Sid Meier's game is pure crap; I spent about 6 days playing the single and multiplayer maps and I was disappointed with every aspect of the game: graphics, sound, controls, design, game logic, economic model, RR model, historic accuracy, replayabilty and last, but not least, overall entertainment value. It is one of the worst games I have ever played... and I have played more of them than I should have. This game is an absolute ***ZERO*** Like some1 said b4: "Shame on you Sid."… Expand
  7. gregthreet
    Jul 11, 2012
    6
    My review for this somewhat disappeared so i'm going to have to re-write it. Call of Duty 3 is the game before the game which shaped the following games in the Call of Duty series, the squeal to that game which will then make the future of Call of Duty games and the multiplayer in every multiplayer game ever from then on, also making the series from then on being one of the most hated uponMy review for this somewhat disappeared so i'm going to have to re-write it. Call of Duty 3 is the game before the game which shaped the following games in the Call of Duty series, the squeal to that game which will then make the future of Call of Duty games and the multiplayer in every multiplayer game ever from then on, also making the series from then on being one of the most hated upon and most bought game series ever. Holy poop that's confusing huh? In simple form, this was a forgotten part of the series. Its the game which led to Modern Warfare, one of the biggest game changers in the series. This game however is a singleplayer based game(shows how the series has changed ay!?), which is great. It feels very capable of capturing the mood of WWII, which is good. You feel tense as you walk down a trench feeling that you could be shot at any moment, this is brilliant and really captures the game. You can see its a CoD game and it plays fairly well. The multiplayer is crap. Mind you its CoD at its routes which is very nice to see. Has lots of graphical flaws though which sometimes takeaway from the mood. E.g. you're supposed to be in a tense situation and a team mate runs into a tank which should kill them but ignores them to shoot near you despite the fact your in cover. The game plays well and is perfect for CoD fans who want a difference.… Expand
  8. dante_finn
    Nov 23, 2012
    10
    Call Of Duty 3 delivers the intensity of bieng in war. It delivers a seamless narrative, unreleting battle, and breathtaking action
  9. eva3si0n
    Feb 22, 2021
    7
    Call of Duty 3 many missed, firstly because it is a console exclusive, and secondly in 2007 the COD4 came out, after which no one needed 3 part at all. But in fact, this is one of the best parts of the series about WW2. Yes, the setting of the western front of 1944 is very tired, but here you can play for the Poles and French partisans. And most importantly, at least some plot appeared inCall of Duty 3 many missed, firstly because it is a console exclusive, and secondly in 2007 the COD4 came out, after which no one needed 3 part at all. But in fact, this is one of the best parts of the series about WW2. Yes, the setting of the western front of 1944 is very tired, but here you can play for the Poles and French partisans. And most importantly, at least some plot appeared in the 3 part. In general, this is a great game, for 2006, showing the potential of Treyarch. On PS3 the game looks average, QTE elements are generally terrible. The game noticeably slows down, giving an average of 20-24 frames.… Expand
  10. AlanD.
    Jul 14, 2007
    8
    This is the highest rating i have ever given a true FPS game. I didn't even really want this game, but as a ps3 owner there wasn't much else to chose from a few months ago. The game plays great overall, but it has moments that really shine. As for the sixaxiss, even though the riffle butting and steering for jeeps was kind of cool, the other mini games were just plain annoying, This is the highest rating i have ever given a true FPS game. I didn't even really want this game, but as a ps3 owner there wasn't much else to chose from a few months ago. The game plays great overall, but it has moments that really shine. As for the sixaxiss, even though the riffle butting and steering for jeeps was kind of cool, the other mini games were just plain annoying, such as screwing in pins for charges. The ending was a let down, as well as the overall story, which is why it didn't get a 10.… Expand
  11. Justarius
    Feb 23, 2007
    8
    My buddy and I compared the 360 vs PS3 version side by side on the same Sony 50" 1080P TV. They are identical. You'd need a magnifying glass to see a difference. And MP was always great with multiple 30 person servers to choose from, especially now a few months after launch. I wouldn't say the PS3 version is better, but for sure a total tie. Actually I really like rifle butting My buddy and I compared the 360 vs PS3 version side by side on the same Sony 50" 1080P TV. They are identical. You'd need a magnifying glass to see a difference. And MP was always great with multiple 30 person servers to choose from, especially now a few months after launch. I wouldn't say the PS3 version is better, but for sure a total tie. Actually I really like rifle butting by flicking the controller (motion sensor). Too funny. So I give it a slight nod over the 360 version.… Expand
  12. AlexC
    Jul 21, 2009
    7
    Being that it's 2009 and this was released a few year back, the game is good. Obviously, doesn't compare to COD4 or COD:WAW, but it's still a good game. The multiplayer reminds me of old school online games... and lots of people still play!
  13. SmokeyM.
    Nov 24, 2006
    10
    This is solid first person shooter with amazing graphics and an impressive online! This is a must buy!
  14. BobD.
    Feb 18, 2008
    0
    I got this game in the hopes that single player mode would prove entertaining; sadly it only proved to be exceedingly repetitive, rigid and stupid. I can't tell you how many times i got killed just because my friendly bot helpers blocked my retreat. If I could get a refund for this game I would. Please don't buy it.
  15. AlecB.
    Dec 28, 2006
    8
    Best war game ever made so far. The only thing I am disappointed is on the back of the box it supports 1080i but I only reads 480 and 720p. I am looking foward for Rainbow Six Vegas
  16. Justinavery7074
    Apr 1, 2013
    8
    I've always enjoyed the historical Call of Duty games and this was just another fun game. Nothing really special here but if you want to kill some time without getting sucked into a story, it's a wise choice.
  17. Diego1390
    Dec 14, 2012
    7
    The best COD ever. Although it may seem repetitive this genre is not boring. The PS3 version is more dynamic according to the control, unlike the PS2 has higher quality graphics, but the trouble is the online mode because the servers are somewhat decayed
  18. thepatient613
    Feb 16, 2016
    7
    Solid gameplay. Before COD was rehashed twice a year. There was nothing groundbreaking about this installment and it definitely should'nt have been console only. Still, if you feel like playing a more classic FPS and just want to do a quick playthrough, I'd say it's worth a shot for 10$.
  19. resumegam3
    Apr 28, 2014
    8
    As my all time favourite CoD being World at War, i bought call of duty 3. this game could be completed in about 8 hours. But it's just a really nice shooter, it is a lot like the other CoDs, but call of duty is a great franchise. Multiplayer was good too. Overall, this is your typical first person shooter, buta really good one. in case you haven't noticed, i LOVE shooters.
  20. bigboss1964
    Oct 6, 2014
    4
    Call Of Duty 3

    Game-Play:The game is a typical FPS nothing new or special. Story:The story is set up in the war world 2 but it not really feels like it totally uninspiring this out any good characters. Graphics:The graphics is something good that this game have. Notes:The game is a big let down from the second game witch it was great,also one of the things that i liked in this    Call Of Duty 3

    Game-Play:The game is a typical FPS nothing new or special.

    Story:The story is set up in the war world 2 but it not really feels like it totally uninspiring this out any good characters.

    Graphics:The graphics is something good that this game have.

    Notes:The game is a big let down from the second game witch it was great,also one of the things that i liked in this game is the weapon there are lot of weapon in this game.    … Expand
  21. ALMSOUD94
    Jun 29, 2016
    7
    One of best WW Games and Fps Shooters, While graphics aren't so impressive, there's also the annoying qte and some aspects haven't Aged that well, still this game is a blast with Intense gameplay, great choice of difficulties and nice storytelling
  22. T0x1cc3r34l
    Jun 20, 2018
    8
    good game,good graphics but the story could have been better and that's kinda it
  23. Kvantaliani03
    Nov 20, 2021
    6
    rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
  24. FidelGastro
    May 19, 2021
    7
    So i´ve just finished this one of the first PS3 games. Campaign was +-10 hours lenght and i must say it was filled with lot of action. For a 2006, graphics are pretty and especially gun models are very good.
    But somehow, the campaign was kinda weird. It wasnt even half way epic as the campaign in Call of Duty 2. For some reason they tried so hard to be funny in dialogues, that its not    So i´ve just finished this one of the first PS3 games. Campaign was +-10 hours lenght and i must say it was filled with lot of action. For a 2006, graphics are pretty and especially gun models are very good.
    But somehow, the campaign was kinda weird. It wasnt even half way epic as the campaign in Call of Duty 2. For some reason they tried so hard to be funny in dialogues, that its not funny at all.

    Driving model is fine during "Jeep driving" part, but steering Sherman tank is very weird.

    One of the biggest issues i had during my walktrough was definitely level design, enemies respawing in same spots, going hide to same spots. + You cant skip cutscenes.

    Im glad, that i have finished this game, but there is nothing special in this game, its 7/10 CoD.    … Expand
  25. Johnsonsteed91
    Jul 6, 2023
    6
    This would be the moment where the WW2 idea gets old and pretty boring, the game for its time isnt bad, rather linear and easy to complete. Feels rather empty as far as content is concerned. Due to multiplayer never taking off or the lack of fun to be had in MP there has not been a real community or online following for this game.
  26. uoKAOS
    Oct 21, 2022
    8
    The first Treyarch CoD ever made, really loved it back then. Everything is cool about this game, beautiful graphics and great playability for it's time!! Dope campaign mode! The only thing I don't really like about this game is the snipers control and movements!
  27. kjaroslaw
    Nov 17, 2022
    3
    Not an interesting story campaign. The games in the series often feature epic moments and interesting characters. While playing CoD 3 I felt bored and didn't want to finish it - this is the worst CoD ever for me.
  28. Jaidenbrkl1
    Mar 30, 2023
    9
    For a Call of Duty before the big one that was Modern Warfare, it is heavier and more persistent experience than Resistance, even though the core graphics could be a bit better in my opinion.
  29. FrankCreeper
    Jul 28, 2023
    6
    A Call of duty game that didnt aged very well the story is fine but gameplay is very static for his predecessor and A.I isnt very well

Awards & Rankings

5
#5 Best PS3 Game of 2006
3
#3 Most Discussed PS3 Game of 2006
2
#2 Most Shared PS3 Game of 2006

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
80

Generally favorable reviews - based on 43 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 39 out of 43
  2. Mixed: 4 out of 43
  3. Negative: 0 out of 43
  1. GameSpot
    82
    A great game with thoroughly enjoyable multiplayer, quality presentation, and some mildly-interesting tilt-control support. It is missing a couple of features that its Xbox 360 counterpart contains, and the frame rate is far less reliable in this version, but the overall intensity and playability of Call of Duty 3 remains intact, despite these few issues.
    Read full review
  2. GameBrink
    84
    Take one part classic Call of Duty scripted FPS action, add in two parts improved level design, another one part updated graphics, and just about four parts upgraded multiplayer and you've got the ultimate Call of Duty stew.
    Read full review
  3. GameZone
    88
    The game mechanics and general feel of the game are not overly different from what gamers are used to, but that this is brought to such vivid life on a console is a tribute to the diligence of the developers.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »