- Publisher: Playmore
- Release Date: Dec 9, 2003
Buy Now
- Critic score
- Publication
- By date
-
A game that is generally easy to control, but that has a lot of issues when it comes to the finer movements usually associated with the special attacks and combos used by most characters.
-
Don’t expect breakthrough graphics or new innovations, expect King of Fighter nostalgia and good old fashion 2D fighting.
-
These two versions of SNK’s long-running franchise compensate for their outdated visuals and muffled sounds with well-honed and rewarding gameplay that’s as hard as it is rewarding if you’re into this type of game.
-
All in all KOF 2000 and 2001 are average games. The gameplay is the same as in any other fighting game. Plus, there is a lack of customization in every department.
-
It feels good on the PS2 pad, even, though a joystick is (of course!) preferable.
-
PSM MagazineIt may not push the boundaries of the genre in any real way, but it does provide a wealth of characters, depth and generally well-balanced gameplay. [Feb 2004, p.32]
-
By today’s standards, these games probably won’t mean much to gamers who grew up on the combo flow-charts of Tekken and Soul Calibur, but these King games are nevertheless very playable thanks to responsive controls and intuitive easy-to-execute moves.
-
There aren’t many extras in each title and the two titles feel dated. But hardcore fight fans get a lot substance for a little cash.
-
GameNowSNK creates quirky, memorable characters with interesting moves, and KOF 2001 in particular showcases a huge number of these. [Jan 2004, p.58]
-
Those of you who are patient enough to learn its intricacies, and open-minded enough to put up with its modest production values will find a rich experience.
-
Electronic Gaming MonthlyRavaged by age and running on obsolete technology, it's uglier than ever. Still, you can't call KOF incompetent - atrociously lazy and reluctant to change, but not incompetent. [Jan 2004, p.133]
-
GMR MagazineThe only problem with SNK's KoF double-pack is the two KOF's SNK chose to pack together. [Jan 2004, p.72]
-
AceGamezWords can't really describe how unbearable 2000's graphics are. They are blocky, unpolished and the colours used for the characters are pretty appalling.
-
Cheat Code CentralWhile it may not be fair to say that if you've played one fighting game, you've played them all, I could probably say with certainty that if you've played more than a few fighting games you've played better ones than KOF 2000/2001.
-
Graphically, both King of Fighters 2000 and 2001 are nearly pixel-perfect ports. Unfortunately, this is as much a liability as anything. The character sprites are low-resolution, as befits three-year-old Neo-Geo games, and the backgrounds are muddy and annoyingly aliased.
-
The bigger problem is that 2000 and 2001 aren't the best games in the series. [Jan 2004, p.123]
Awards & Rankings
|
45
|
#45 Most Shared PS2 Game of 2003
|
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 20 out of 22
-
Mixed: 0 out of 22
-
Negative: 2 out of 22
-
Eddy:PMar 22, 2004ALL KOF ROCKS!
-
TaiweeT.Mar 10, 2004
-
BrandonN.Jan 20, 2004