- Publisher: EA Games
- Release Date: Nov 11, 2003
User Score
Generally favorable reviews- based on 135 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 80 out of 135
-
Mixed: 39 out of 135
-
Negative: 16 out of 135
Buy Now
Review this game
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- By date
- Most helpful
-
JoshB.Dec 7, 2003Well, the beggining Pearl Harbor level rocked, but it was down hill from there, plus it was far too linear. I'd reccomend a rental, but that is it.
-
-
KBNov 27, 2003A lot of fun...really..but was disappointed at how fast it ended.
-
-
DenisR.,Jr.Nov 20, 2003
-
-
JenNov 15, 2003Way too easy, and WAYYYYYYY too quick. I feel like I wasted 50 bucks in a BIG way. Shame on EA for making this so short just so they can have a sequel next year. Do yourself a favor and rent it.
-
-
AdamL.Nov 17, 2003
-
-
PhilK.Nov 18, 2003I think it's horrile compared to MOH frontline. the graphics are not that good and I beat the game in a matter of days. Nothing like the the first MOH. Did EA go cheap? What's the deal with having to wait until next year to rescue the brother character? STUPID marketing ploy!!! It's like playing that Castle Wolfenstein Crappy game!!
-
-
NighttrainNov 18, 2003This installment lacks: detail in the enivorments, non-retarded AI at times and flamethowers! I mean how can you not talk WWII in the pacific and not talk flamethowers! On the up side there are a few decent tidbits to enhance gameplay... this is good but not the medal of honor that i am used to.
-
-
NighttrainNov 18, 2003This installment lacks: detail in the enivorments, non-retarded AI at times and flamethowers! I mean how can you not talk WWII in the pacific and not talk flamethowers! On the up side there are a few decent tidbits to enhance gameplay... this is good but not the medal of honor that i am used to.
-
-
GeorgeC.Nov 19, 2003Great graphics, great sound, great storyline, ending was very disappointing and it came way too soon, only nine boards, are you kidding me??? has great potential, but there are many things that need to be improved on, like smarter AI, a little more variety, too much jungle.
-
-
Aug 16, 2014
-
Jan 26, 2023Game is pretty forgettable. Not very challenging either. Framerate can drop quite a bit in some sections. That said there is still some fun to be had and I liked the jungle/ temple theming.
-
Oct 19, 2014nice grapchics but story and levels are tooo boring . . .
-
Oct 10, 2018rrrrrrrrrrraaaaaaaaaaadddddddddddiiiiiiiiiiicccccccccccaaaaaaaaaaalllllllllll
-
Jul 21, 2020
-
Jul 3, 2022This game is a downgrade from Frontline. i like him because of the story in coop
-
Sep 3, 2023Gaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaamessss!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! mof rs
Awards & Rankings
|
17
|
#17 Most Discussed PS2 Game of 2003
|
|
20
|
#20 Most Shared PS2 Game of 2003
|
-
A formulaic, by the numbers FPS with zero innovation, demented AI and a crushing lack of inspiration.
-
It's not a bad game, but then again, it's not the be-all and end-all Pacific-theater FPS we expected. The primary emphasis on gloss and glamour over gameplay and challenge suggests that Rising Sun is geared more toward the tyro rather than the savant.
-
Quite simply, the game offers nothing that you cant get in the other games, and cant have a better time getting in the other games.