Hulk

 PlayStation 2
User Score
7.7

Generally favorable reviews- based on 27 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 16 out of 27
  2. Mixed: 8 out of 27
  3. Negative: 3 out of 27
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. ChrisV.
    Jun 29, 2003
    7
    Not bad, camera can get a bit annoying, but it's fun, smashing stuff...although it would get repetitive and Alex, no one cares about your dad, stop bragging.
  2. AndrewJ.
    Aug 1, 2003
    6
    Once you get past the "thrill" of smashing things, the game falls deeply into boredom. And the parts with controlling Bruce Banner are downright dull.
  3. Sam
    Sep 10, 2004
    6
    Play this game for an hour, you will love it. Play it for more, bored to tears. Fun, but so repetetive every 2 hours or so you will need to stop for a little while so youl like it again.
  4. Zilcell
    Nov 22, 2011
    7
    It is a fun game. It is not perfect because of the camera and the Bruce Banner levels. It does have some cool fighting gameplay and great graphics, which help it become recommendable.

Awards & Rankings

88
#88 Most Discussed PS2 Game of 2003
74
#74 Most Shared PS2 Game of 2003

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
71

Mixed or average reviews - based on 28 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 13 out of 28
  2. Mixed: 14 out of 28
  3. Negative: 1 out of 28
  1. Cincinnati Enquirer
    75
    The Hulkster follows commands easily, the camera gives you an excellent view of the action and you don't need to mash 20 buttons for every combat move you make.
    Read full review
  2. GameSpy
    69
    Too simple for its own good, yet somehow likable in the end.
    Read full review
  3. Official U.S. Playstation Magazine
    80
    Sealth missions excepted, you're in for a genuinely fun eight hours of gameplay in The Hulk. [July 2003, p.91]
See all critic reviews »