- Publisher: Square EA
- Release Date: Dec 17, 2001
- Also On: PlayStation Vita
User Score
Generally favorable reviews- based on 1982 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 1,750 out of 1982
-
Mixed: 123 out of 1982
-
Negative: 109 out of 1982
Buy Now
Review this game
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- By date
- Most helpful
-
Jun 23, 2020Its a bad FF for the 1st one of its generation, voices, 'nice' grafics can really make a good game alone, it has its moments, for the good or for the... tidus laughing moments.
-
Jun 9, 2013
-
Jan 1, 2015
-
Mar 24, 2013
-
Jan 6, 2015
-
Jul 15, 2012
-
PhilM.May 15, 2008
-
-
MichaelE.Jun 7, 2005I give the game a 6 because i got the dark aeon and the new game + is missing in the americain one.So squaresoft it over me.it`s feel like i pay for a beta (the game is non complete).
-
-
[Anonymous]Jul 14, 2002FF7 was way better. The story was stupid. Once you got past Macalania it was super boring. Yunalesca was too hard. The first time it took me a month to beat her.
-
-
JackR.Sep 9, 2003This game seriously blew. The graphics were great (hence the 5 rating), but i think it's a testament to how completely boring the game is when you consider that I've only beaten it just now-- and it's an easy game! I say bring back FF7-- that game rocked.
-
-
BlueFalconJul 21, 2005
-
-
EagleEyeMay 7, 2003This is good, I like the story and characters but its not a real game, you spend 80% of your time watching cut scenes and i wish i was being over the top but thats for real. Major dissapointment after ff7.... i certainly won't be goin for another ff until its a game again.
-
-
ShaneS.Oct 24, 2007
-
-
ZiggyStardustAug 28, 2002While I do appreciate the great story, longevity, and sweet video sequences, I actually somewhat regret purchasing FFX. The gameplay is rather boring, and it's difficult to get in to. I wish there was more skill and strategy involved. Perhaps it's best suited to patient RPG fanatics.
-
-
Nov 21, 2011Not a bad game, but it feels like they concentrated more on the graphics and appearance, than the content and merit... Doesn't hold up too well compared to FFIX, but still playing it was enjoyable.
-
Oct 1, 2015
-
Nov 3, 2020
-
Mar 14, 2016
-
Oct 11, 2017As most final fantasy games are, this is definitely a shining gem of JRPG games. But I had trouble really getting into the game - blitzball is basically a meme (it controls terribly) and I had so little direction in some of the early game battles and quests that it took me three or four tries before I made it past the opening sequence of this game.
-
Aug 28, 2020The game is fun and has great graphics but it has a painful amount of cutscenes that are also painful in length.
The story is decent but it's hard to keep interest when cutscenes are cutting into your playing time.
The game is a classic and a must have for PS2 RPG collectors. Just be sure to set aside some time to watch as much as you get to play. -
CharlieG.Jun 6, 2006Maybe I just hate RPG's, but I think this game really sucked because it is difficult and repetitive in a bad way.
-
-
BryanS.Dec 6, 2006Amazing story, but too much of it. I felt like I wasn't even playing a game, but watching a movie. Most of the game involved pressing X to continue to the next scene.
-
-
Dec 26, 2021
-
Jul 24, 2023
Awards & Rankings
|
9
|
|
|
2
|
#2 Most Discussed PS2 Game of 2001
|
|
5
|
#5 Most Shared PS2 Game of 2001
|
-
We've seen the Final Fantasy epic take us on a memorable journey, but now it all seems like it's been done before. 10 is good, great at times, but it is no longer original.
-
The replay value is very low, and the design is flawed by an inability to skip past sequences, even in replay mode. The playability also suffers by a lack of freedom of movement.
-
Great RPG and certainly the best one on the PS2 currently, however, I feel it isn't as great as past FF's have been due to its lack of freedom.