Call of Duty: World at War - Final Fronts

 PlayStation 2
User Score
6.5

Mixed or average reviews- based on 52 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 23 out of 52
  2. Mixed: 17 out of 52
  3. Negative: 12 out of 52
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. MAINEiac4434
    May 31, 2011
    3
    Horrendous. Stupidly short (it's so short I didn't even realize the game was over when it ended), muddy graphics and frustrating controls all drive this game down.

    Also: no zombie mode! Why not, Activision? Was it too difficult to put in a co-op zombie mode on you're ridiculously bad PS2 port of World at War?

    PS2 users deserve much better than this.
  2. ChrisF
    Aug 29, 2009
    4
    I bought this game thinking it would be as good as other wartime games such as blackhawk down, but it is not even close. The graphics are solid, but no co-op campaign or for that matter even one vs. one mode totally ruined the game for me
  3. Le_Shorte
    Jun 11, 2013
    0
    Well, I spent $2 on this game. Wasn't worth that, for sure. It's maybe 2 hours long, the voice acting and writing are both horrendous, and the graphics are sub-par for PS2 standards, even.
  4. homer4president
    Mar 25, 2015
    4
    Sadly, Final Fronts doesn't do nearly enough to distinguish itself from older Call of Duty games, and hardly bears any resemblance at all to the other versions of World at War. Any of the gameplay innovations to come into the series from last year's Call of Duty 4 and the other versions of World at War are absent here, leaving this PS2 version playing more like an expansion pack to the PS2Sadly, Final Fronts doesn't do nearly enough to distinguish itself from older Call of Duty games, and hardly bears any resemblance at all to the other versions of World at War. Any of the gameplay innovations to come into the series from last year's Call of Duty 4 and the other versions of World at War are absent here, leaving this PS2 version playing more like an expansion pack to the PS2 versions of Call of Duty 2 and 3. Combine that with the muddy graphics engine and some just plain brain-dead enemy AI, and Final Fronts just ends up being a complete bore.… Expand
  5. LuanGamer
    Jun 17, 2015
    3
    Essa versão do ps2 é um lixo , a historia é ok , falta do multiplayer , e graficos lixo , e esses controles vacilou bonito em Treyarch , pelo menos a versão do x360 não é assim -_-
  6. J0e
    Jan 15, 2016
    0
    This game has bad characters that were cool before and a bad story everything is bad. Overall this game is so bad do not buy it just do not waste your own money like I did.
  7. SupahGualtah
    Jun 4, 2020
    3
    dont get this i was young and thought this would be basically the same as the x360 vers but with **** graph. awful game

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
tbd

No score yet - based on 2 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 1 out of 2
  2. Mixed: 0 out of 2
  3. Negative: 1 out of 2
  1. Gameplanet
    90
    The single-player campaign involves a riveting and emotional story, and the inclusion of co-op is fantastic. The game itself however is heavily weighted towards multiplayer, as was its predecessor.
    Read full review
  2. IGN
    45
    A lack of online multiplayer or co-op and an overpowering sense that you've done all this before -- multiple times, in fact -- dilutes any of the impact that Final Fronts could have had.
    Read full review