- Publisher: Activision
- Release Date: Nov 16, 2004
User Score
Mixed or average reviews- based on 122 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 63 out of 122
-
Mixed: 37 out of 122
-
Negative: 22 out of 122
Buy Now
Review this game
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- By date
- Most helpful
-
Mar 26, 2011
-
PatrickM.Nov 29, 2004
-
-
Jul 21, 2012
-
Mar 31, 2012A good game, able to compete with the other major shooters at the time, like MOH, but brings nothing new to the table and has many points where you die multiple times with little progress. These choke points are a problem, but all around a good fps
-
Catraven70Nov 20, 2004I enjoy playing a WWII shooter that gives you the full wartime experience. Call of Duty does just this. The controls take some getting used to but I think it's well worth the effort.
-
-
Oct 27, 2012This was not a bad first person shooter for PlayStation 2, however the game-play was not very good and levels could become frustrating. If you need to play a World War Two FPS on PS2, go for Big Red One.
-
Oct 30, 2017Un Call ofof Duty que pasa sin pena ni gloria. Se pierde entra tantos títulos de la saga. No es un mal juego pero está ahí para disfrutar unas horas y ya está, queda olvidado por siempre.
Awards & Rankings
|
74
|
|
|
24
|
#24 Most Discussed PS2 Game of 2004
|
|
53
|
#53 Most Shared PS2 Game of 2004
|
-
The game is brutal, yes, but bloody? No. Maybe it's because everything seems to happen so fast you don't need to see it, I don't know.
-
The game's single-player campaign is enjoyable despite some questionable design choices, and the multiplayer is capable, as well. That said, while Finest Hour is always good and often times great, it never quite reaches excellence.
-
It's more than equal to any of the console "Medal of Honor" titles, although we're desperately hoping that developers will now give it some time to truly shake up the genre a little and bring some new ideas to the table.