User Score
Generally favorable reviews- based on 32 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 23 out of 32
-
Mixed: 5 out of 32
-
Negative: 4 out of 32
Buy Now
Review this game
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- By date
- Most helpful
-
JohnK.Jun 10, 200510 times better than the first one, better graphics, exellent weapons, very realistic.
-
-
CorpralJackM.Jan 3, 2006Excelent and historicly accurate game! I can't beleive a developer actually got a WWII game correct!
-
-
JeremyS.Dec 25, 2005one of the better war games i think annyways because of a lot of the stuff they put in there it was good i hoping for a 3 one the more they make the better they get well for some games anny ways some just get worse and worse lol. raw vs smake down or the new 50 cent one boring as hell i played them dont know if it was the worng peole who made it or what but them game sucked.
-
-
BillH.Jan 15, 2006
-
-
May 26, 2017Definitely a better game on pc platform, but not bad here either. Love war games, so loved this one too. ALso, liked the co-op of this game. A little slow but still gameplay is nice.
Awards & Rankings
-
The first-person caper is satisfyingly immersive thanks to some outstanding graphical touches - heavy rain splatters neatly on Jeeps and we can even see Red’s freckles in close-up.
-
It's mostly AI problems that doom it, which goes as far as not only destroying your ability to command troops, but the fundamental design of the game as a whole.
-
The result of a single botched command or accidental mismanagement can mean death for you and your troops, making Earned in Blood a frustrating (but not unrewarding) experience.