User Score
6.0

Mixed or average reviews- based on 50 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 24 out of 50
  2. Negative: 17 out of 50
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
  1. MarcinX.
    Feb 17, 2004
    10
    This game is fun.
  2. LeeR.
    Feb 2, 2004
    8
    This is a brilliant game can i say any more not 100% the best game has a few downsides ie playing yugi over and over again you could play different people.
  3. ChristopherN.
    Mar 17, 2004
    10
    This Game is extremly SICK.
  4. Nigel
    May 3, 2004
    10
    This game is the bomm.man totally great.
  5. WernerH.
    Jul 3, 2004
    10
    This game is super best game ever played!!!
  6. Nigel
    May 3, 2004
    10
    This game is the bomm.man totally great.
  7. GiedriavasA.
    Feb 1, 2005
    10
    This is a cool game.
  8. COKE
    Apr 13, 2004
    9
    Yeah dis game is great..but I can't semm to reach no where...e-mail me if you got tips for me to win!!
Metascore
52

Mixed or average reviews - based on 4 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 0 out of 4
  2. Negative: 1 out of 4
  1. For Yu-Gi-Oh! fans, the meager options make it less attractive than one of Konami's dozen or so other, more fully featured Yu-Gi-Oh! games, and to players who don't already have an investment in the series, it has about as much to offer as a game of solitaire.
  2. PC Gamer
    51
    Simply missing too many features to justify the purchase. Collectible-card-game fans should opt for "Magic: The Gathering Online" instead, so they can face truly challenging opponents: other human players. [Apr 2004, p.83]
  3. Computer Games Magazine
    50
    With the addition of any type of multiplayer Yu-Gi-Oh! would have been a solid competitor to other CCG videogames on the market. As it stands, it's merely a satisfying and addictive upgrade to Solitaire. [June 2004, p.81]