Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege

 PC
User Score
7.0

Mixed or average reviews- based on 1890 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 1,197 out of 1890
  2. Mixed: 300 out of 1890
  3. Negative: 393 out of 1890
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. Hackerbee
    Mar 13, 2018
    6
    Man has this game ever made a turn around, got anticheat, got netcode fixes a ton of content a lot of cheaters have been banned, and there is now a big push to clean up the human garbage out of the ever so toxic community, more recently hackers have managed to bypass battleeye, but the game is still in the best state now than it has ever been, the game has a very steep skill curve, but itMan has this game ever made a turn around, got anticheat, got netcode fixes a ton of content a lot of cheaters have been banned, and there is now a big push to clean up the human garbage out of the ever so toxic community, more recently hackers have managed to bypass battleeye, but the game is still in the best state now than it has ever been, the game has a very steep skill curve, but it is probably one of the single best multiplayer fps games ever made now, it looses points due to Ubisoft botching the launch and taking 2 years to get their **** together with this game, and 2 more points for launching without anticheat back in the day. but it is a great game now and @ 20$ for the starter edition well worth your money if you like team based fps games.

    Old review from when the game first came out:

    This game gets a 2 for only after a year getting a real anticheat (Battle eye), and for the incredible destructibility that the environments in the game offer. albeit to late to make this game what it could have been.
    The game has way to much interp, and has a very real problem with people exploiting the **** netcode and ping advantage afforded by this.
    This game had the potential to have over throne CSGO as the big competitive shooter, but languished in Ubisofts incompetent hands, game breaking bug after game breaking bug fixed and then introduced by Ubisoft, and day one issues that continue to plague this game to this day. most glaring of which is the **** netcode, and broken matchmaker that can leave you sitting in queue for upwards of 40 mins, in some cases in ranked. it completely kills the momentum of the game, but that is not even what really killed this game, no its death came early right at launch when this game was left with no anticheat what so ever for at least 3 months before "Fairfight" came, and even then it was highly ineffectual to the point that the game became unplayable due to the amount of rampaging wallhackers in the community. only after the introduction of Battleeye did the game really show its true potential, while still being hamstrung by **** netcode and broken matchmaker. This game is a prime example of how a big name Developer can absolutely destroy a great idea.    … Expand
  2. Angmax55
    Mar 2, 2018
    10
    This game isn’t perfect, but I still gave it a 10 because it has hooked me for 700+ hours now with all its new content being added and unique tactical gameplay. It will kick down in the first few hours of play, but I guarantee you will learn from your mistakes and finally reach a point where you can understand why I love this game so much. Must pick this up!
  3. chocobreak
    Feb 23, 2018
    10
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Finally FPS which requires usage of brain unlike some retarded CoD or one of the million CoD clones.
    Awesome maps, destructible environment, great weapons, unlocks etc. GOTY material.    … Expand
  4. SaydaNeen
    Feb 19, 2018
    8
    Awesome game, i do very much love this game. 2 marks lost because of team killers and sometimes toxic community. I haven't come across cheaters yet or noticed it i guess but when a 12 year old says "I hate this map, i'm just going to team kill." it just removes the fun. There needs to be consequences for stuff like that otherwise it makes a toxic environment. It wouldn't be hard to setAwesome game, i do very much love this game. 2 marks lost because of team killers and sometimes toxic community. I haven't come across cheaters yet or noticed it i guess but when a 12 year old says "I hate this map, i'm just going to team kill." it just removes the fun. There needs to be consequences for stuff like that otherwise it makes a toxic environment. It wouldn't be hard to set something up where a match is red flagged for the admins when a team kill happens followed by a report, come on UBI. Other than that operators are pretty well balanced and fun, love the tactical and teamplay, not very many games gives you this kind of play.… Expand
  5. OptimusBlyad
    Feb 11, 2018
    2
    **** this game, I smashed my mouse for 50 euros, headphones also barely go to me, anti-cheat is **** in older games there is no such problem, for example cs 1.6. Do you enter the game what greets you? A child is tearing at the whole house. And in the second team? ****ing cheaters who not pick you but he kill you, and on the demo it's like he got out in the middle. And hitbox, you shoot in**** this game, I smashed my mouse for 50 euros, headphones also barely go to me, anti-cheat is **** in older games there is no such problem, for example cs 1.6. Do you enter the game what greets you? A child is tearing at the whole house. And in the second team? ****ing cheaters who not pick you but he kill you, and on the demo it's like he got out in the middle. And hitbox, you shoot in the head and he do not get anything, he shoots you in the arm, and you get in the head, logic.… Expand
  6. francesco170503
    Jan 30, 2018
    10
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This is a game with the best graphic ever, you can play it with a team or in solo but it still the best game i have ever play. In terms of cost it doesn't cost too much; it is really affordable. i really suggest it.… Expand
  7. Jonnif1
    Jan 28, 2018
    4
    Average
    Might be one of the best games , but under Ubisoft they ruined it
    First of all in the beginning the game was so cool and realistic now it seems a cartoon game more likely Overwatch than hunting Terrorists As every game of Ubisoft you must have a premade team to play if you don't have premade team you have trouble since the enemy team might be premade team even in Casual which    Average
    Might be one of the best games , but under Ubisoft they ruined it
    First of all in the beginning the game was so cool and realistic now it seems a cartoon game
    more likely Overwatch than hunting Terrorists
    As every game of Ubisoft you must have a premade team to play
    if you don't have premade team you have trouble since the enemy team
    might be premade team even in Casual which is not fair for low levels players
    and that s why people quit , but I don't wonder since is an Ubisoft game
    and I can't expect the best , in the last years I am very negative towards Ubisoft .    … Expand
  8. Azog95
    Jan 24, 2018
    9
    wow, amazing game and original one, u can't find another r6 game in last 10 years.
  9. serhi16
    Jan 22, 2018
    10
    Игра супер всем рекомендую реально тактический шутер от первого лица
  10. desistodavida66
    Jan 19, 2018
    10
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. thats one of the best games i ve ever played and ubisoft is doing a perfect job with the game 1010… Expand
  11. Ansatsu83
    Jan 10, 2018
    1
    Rainbow six games, to me, have always been about a decent counter terrorism story, loadout customization, and terrorist hunt. This game has almost none of this. It is a multiplayer centered shooter, where terrorist hunt is frowned upon because it does not provide enough of a reward, so not many people play it. Loadouts are another huge issue for me. The weapons are specific to the factionRainbow six games, to me, have always been about a decent counter terrorism story, loadout customization, and terrorist hunt. This game has almost none of this. It is a multiplayer centered shooter, where terrorist hunt is frowned upon because it does not provide enough of a reward, so not many people play it. Loadouts are another huge issue for me. The weapons are specific to the faction a character is from. In rb6, its made up of forces from all over the world, so why cant I select any weapon from all over the world, too? As for the story, apparently the game asks "What's Story?" cause there is none. This is a slap in the face to Tom Clancy and is very much intended to be a mulitplayer 5v5 shooter with the wrong label slapped on it. Should have just been called Siege as its not rainbow six.… Expand
  12. Mitya64
    Jan 4, 2018
    8
    Отличная графика. Хорошая оптиммизация. Высокое качество звука. Высокий порог вхождения. Требования к командной работе. Отличная физика. Мало режимов. Нет сингла. Много персов. Куча карт. Плохой неткод.Нет русских серверов. Спавкиллеры. Отличный геймплей. Куча скинов и т.д. Наиграл 200ч и рекомендую вам брать эту игру с друзьями. 9 из 10Отличная графика. Хорошая оптиммизация. Высокое качество звука. Высокий порог вхождения. Требования к командной работе. Отличная физика. Мало режимов. Нет сингла. Много персов. Куча карт. Плохой неткод.Нет русских серверов. Спавкиллеры. Отличный геймплей. Куча скинов и т.д. Наиграл 200ч и рекомендую вам брать эту игру с друзьями. 9 из 10
  13. Lucifer_210
    Dec 29, 2017
    9
    Unlike games such as CS:GO, Ubisoft focusses this game on intense tactics, teamwork, and strategy. The wide variety of Operators keeps the player interested, though another gamemode could be beneficial in terms of gameplay diversity.
  14. KillsHappen
    Nov 27, 2017
    0
    2 months after "operation healt" old bugs are back + new bugs, poor anticheat, a loots of smurf in game. True game looks nice and ubi have nice idea to make game but it's not all... if i will life only from my ideas i will don't life more than one week!!
    **** this and ubi
  15. muzmuz
    Nov 24, 2017
    10
    Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege is a completely tactical first person shooter that requires patience, carefulness, and some brain matter. I have never enjoyed a multiplayer shooter as much as I enjoyed Rainbow Six Siege with its immersive and heart-pumping methodical combat mechanic.
  16. KittyWhisky
    Oct 21, 2017
    10
    Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege is a game "from love to hatred". Games should evoke emotion, and "the Siege" with this excellent cope. In one game you can experience the as delight and anger. Players of the Russian region is particularly acquainted - we have never had less than 50 ping. But with 100 ping, the game makes you hate on a regular basis.

    Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege is a    Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege is a game "from love to hatred". Games should evoke emotion, and "the Siege" with this excellent cope. In one game you can experience the as delight and anger. Players of the Russian region is particularly acquainted - we have never had less than 50 ping. But with 100 ping, the game makes you hate on a regular basis.

    Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege is a tactical shooter, in which there are destructible, which also need to be use tactically. It's a good game lures - their capabilities. Here you can not just stupid to get in to the enemy through the door and break through the wall, ceiling, blow the door, and the opponent will be confused "where am I to watch?!". Outside you can climb down the wall on ropes, punching the window, hanging and upside down (which at first familiar, but you can get used to) - it is also necessary to use, as the enemy often does not expect. There are different ways to break through walls and other fortifications to strengthen the walls, set various traps. And operatives must have individual abilities and their weapons. All this makes the game insanely replayable, and just a Paradise for lovers to play it on tactics. We also have a drone (team attack), which can be used to mark opponents, and just to check if everything is "clean". In this game, don't just go ahead. Usually you can go to the desired object from about three sides, and even more. And if you know that if you go just like a sheep forward, you die, then you just need to go to the other side and to catch opponents off guard. And it seems so logical, but no, a stupid to go ahead without checking your drone is there ahead of the enemy. This game is about careful gameplay.

    You've planned everything, you're done, you know exactly what is going to kill the opponents, but here comes Ubisoft with their network code that wrote Indian the heel of the left foot. The problems can be different from the second podlaha before his sudden departure from the session. Ubisoft are really trying to fix things, and now it's playing without problems, but you still can kill enemy when you noticed him only a second while on his cell tupil you almost half a minute. Hate it. Due to these technical situations, and many others and I want the hell to remove this horrible game. But the gameplay makes you run, "the Siege" again and again. And when everything turns out as you planned, really enjoy it.

    The game has no story, stand-alone company, there is only multiplayer. To familiarize yourself with the mechanics is "Operation". And it would be better for the beginner to get them to watch the introductory videos, and then only to go into the game. "Siege" requires direct hands, the weapon happens with a character, you also need to know the map, and then you just have no escape routes or don't know how to get around the enemy. Of course, one must know and operatives for whom you play. All of its pluses and minuses. Operatives in the game is not enough, and there will be more. In the "Antiterror" you can train against bots. On the complexity of "Realism" bots are very good, it is generally one of the most intelligent bots to rebuild. take you to the hearing, bypass. This mode is useful for beginners, as there you will get acquainted with the operative and weapons. The gun shoots great, the sound is excellent. But some of the guns look much viagraxna (especially with ACOG). With automatic Ash or famas from Twich much better put headshots. But sometimes ubisoft and shotguns kill for a couple of meters (as it was when I added just Frost). Headshots are literally with one shot (as it should be), but in Siege it may not be skill, but simply luck. The enemy can shoot at you from a vending machine Bandit and one of the twenty bullets will hit you and you die. Hate it. Hitboxes in this game at all bothered. Different investigators different armored is a bit of a controversial decision.

    Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege despite all the technical flaws and the occasional controversial decisions by the dev team, this is a great tactical multiplayer shooter with insane replayability, and gameplay that gives you many opportunities. The game clearly goes for the emotions. It's just the orgasm at the tips of ecstasy!    … Expand
  17. GFGeclipse
    Oct 11, 2017
    7
    R6: Siege is Ubisoft's attempt to kill two birds with one stone by reviving a previously established IP and using a fast pass ticket into the competitive e-sports industry with one title. In doing so all they have established is that they can make games that are flawed by technical faults that heavily detract from an otherwise enjoyable experience.
    You assume the role as one of 33    R6: Siege is Ubisoft's attempt to kill two birds with one stone by reviving a previously established IP and using a fast pass ticket into the competitive e-sports industry with one title. In doing so all they have established is that they can make games that are flawed by technical faults that heavily detract from an otherwise enjoyable experience.
    You assume the role as one of 33 playable operators, each with a unique and distinguished special ability, and play alongside four other players in 5v5 multiplayer attack versus defend game modes. Round are respawn-free, meaning if you die, you're out until the next round.
    Multiplayer is where this game is significantly flawed, which on further inspection is a big concern considering that this game is a multiplayer game.
    A reporting functionality does exist, something that is a must have for every multiplayer game, but despite this, it never seems to actually do anything. This is partially due to the consistent influx of hackers that swarm multiplayer games throughout the year, and also down to the fact that users reporting other players don't receive any form of communication on what action was eventually taken on the reported player, if any was taken at all!
    The matchmaking system is inherently flawed, and new players can expect themselves to be paired up with other new players against a team full of people that should be competing for thousands of dollars in the competitive pro league.
    The game is also riddled with bugs and glitches; some of which are addressed, but most of which are described as 'identified by the development team' and no more. So much so that they even skipped a whole DLC to provide a 'season long' (3 months) period of updates exclusively aimed at fixing issues, which was aptly named 'Operation Health'. Many players (including myself) will tell you that although this season fixed many bugs, for every bug that was fixed, another 10+ were introduced.
    It is evident by all of these attempts that Ubisoft are trying to fix this game to a point where it would excel at being a great tactical multiplayer shooter, but seasoned game design veterans like themselves should know that simply trying is not enough to meet today's industry expectation.
    As with most Ubisoft games, they try to emphasize the highly accurate and realistic visual graphics. What actually happened at launch was a terrible mess of broken lighting in nearly every inch of your screen, and textures that simply didn't live up to the expectations that Ubisoft themselves set during their E3 demo.
    As time has gone on, they have got much better, and the next update promises to improve the overall graphical quality of the game, so I have no real basis to fault them on in the graphics department writing today in 2017. Had I been writing this review a year ago, we may have seen a different story being presented.
    Player progression is an aspect of R6: Siege that I often find being misinterpreted by reviewers who haven't explored the game far enough to understand how player progression actually works. Ubisoft offers two versions of the game, the starter edition, and the standard edition. This pricing model allows gamers who aren't completely sold on the game to purchase a cheaper version where they don't instantly start with a large collection of operators (classes) to play with. They can then choose to unlock these operators with in-game currency, which cannot be purchased with real life money. This is a great move by Ubisoft which allows all players, independent of financial capacity, to experience all of the different operators in the game.
    Gameplay mechanics are where Rainbow Six: Siege properly excels. Players can use RC drones with built in cameras to scope out areas of the map before engaging, and many operators have different traps and gadgets to apply a multitude of effects (both positive and negative) to players who happen to stumble across them, ranging from concussion mines to toxic smoke canisters. These mechanics provide a fun and unique playing experience with a map that is dynamically changing throughout the round, promoting players to think on their feet and adapt to the present situation. This plays well into the re-playability of the game; you are almost guaranteed to never have a match that plays out in a predictable scenario that you have experienced before.
    Options menus are where most PC games fall very short of the mark, but R6: Siege is an exception to this. The game features a highly extensive yet immensely intuitive settings screen, and good news for some gamers, the game features out-of-the-box ultrawide 21:9 aspect ratio support. The 'Ultra HD texture pack' that they offer, which is more than 20 gigabytes in size, doesn't seem to offer any form of improvement to the graphics unless you're using a fancy Dell 8K monitor, but heavily decreases the frame rate of the game, so unless you want to be the very best, you'll probably want to pass on that option.    … Expand
  18. cilmon
    Sep 18, 2017
    9
    For those players who look for a game that requires strategy, deep map learning, improvisation and serious team communication "Rainbow Six: Siege" is a must.
    It's not only about destruction of the maps or gun-play, this game is unique providing immersion and really movie-like situations, it gives you the opportunity to feel like a real swat member.
    We are not talking about an easy and    For those players who look for a game that requires strategy, deep map learning, improvisation and serious team communication "Rainbow Six: Siege" is a must.
    It's not only about destruction of the maps or gun-play, this game is unique providing immersion and really movie-like situations, it gives you the opportunity to feel like a real swat member.
    We are not talking about an easy and friendly game, "Rainbow Six: Siege" requires learning and practice but once you're in it becomes a drug. Not everyone is gonna like it, but the people who play more than 15 hours will love it.
    All DLCs, players and maps are for free to all players and the developers are doing a very good job improving the game and listening carefully to the community.    … Expand
  19. HappyPhilXD
    Sep 16, 2017
    5
    So, the game is in Beta since launch (don't miss that beta sign when entering multiplayer) it's still haveing a big ptoblem with hacks they can't detect and the massive netcode problem and pings are all over the place. And then they want you to pay for 2 Season passes for a game in beta.
  20. Sesshomurai
    Aug 29, 2017
    7
    As others have mentioned, there are some "iconic" features of a R6 game that should not be removed. These are 1) A single player campaign. Clancy was an author. he wrote stories. The stories are interesting. Let's not betray that. 2) 3rd person duck and cover. R6 Vegas nailed this. It was hallmark feature and never quite equaled elsewhere. Where is it? 3) Load outs? Character creation?As others have mentioned, there are some "iconic" features of a R6 game that should not be removed. These are 1) A single player campaign. Clancy was an author. he wrote stories. The stories are interesting. Let's not betray that. 2) 3rd person duck and cover. R6 Vegas nailed this. It was hallmark feature and never quite equaled elsewhere. Where is it? 3) Load outs? Character creation? styling? What was once great about R6 was it put YOU in the role of R6 spec ops. YOU were calling the shots. YOU were leading your team. YOU were making the story. Not this minimap mayhem shootfest. And what is with these shields? The whole beauty of R6 is they are stealth. Not stand your ground behind a blast shield in a force-on-force shoot-em-up......what is this?… Expand
  21. Traslogan
    Aug 24, 2017
    5
    We're into the 2nd year of this product being considered fully launched on the market, but it's only ranked mode is still in beta...
    There's no requirements for getting into ranked, and the devs spam free-weekends so often that it's about as bad as finding servers full of 12-year-olds who just learned how to turn a computer on.
    There's a lot you can say about Siege that is positive,    We're into the 2nd year of this product being considered fully launched on the market, but it's only ranked mode is still in beta...
    There's no requirements for getting into ranked, and the devs spam free-weekends so often that it's about as bad as finding servers full of 12-year-olds who just learned how to turn a computer on.

    There's a lot you can say about Siege that is positive, but the developers, even during this "operation health" project that they've claimed will improve the game, are never fixing the critical issues that make the game have no incentive for you to even try and play.

    A few examples:
    It takes 10 games to get a rank assigned in Ranked mode. The game rigs the 10 games so you are almost always with randoms and usually other unranked players, but rarely against other unranked players and usually organized teams.
    Upon being ranked, you will be given a poor rank thanks to this even if you perform well (Because the rank system is extremely volatile and even if you get 30 kills, losing is still that punishing), and you will begin waiting 10-15 minutes for a game because it now refuses to put you with anyone other than those at said horrendous ranks, but the game will continue to tell you that you will only wait 1 -2 minutes, and will continue blatantly lying at all times.
    There's no requirements for people to have before playing Ranked, so people jump straight into Ranked and ruin it for everyone else after just learning the keybinds in on game of casual. This is a problem with the community, but it's one that is critical and fixable by the devs.

    The only reason this game hasn't become as horrendous as Counter Strike Global Offensive is because, unlike Valve, they haven't started banning people for complaining on the forums. Yet.    … Expand
  22. Voodoo123
    Jul 15, 2017
    9
    Prepare for infinite adapt or die cat & mouse gameplay. This is a game I keep coming back to for the heart pounding tension of never quite knowing what each new round will bring. For every advantage a new tactic or operator brings you, the accidental genius of the other 9 people playing the game with you will blow your mind (and your chosen operator) away. I highly recommend playing withPrepare for infinite adapt or die cat & mouse gameplay. This is a game I keep coming back to for the heart pounding tension of never quite knowing what each new round will bring. For every advantage a new tactic or operator brings you, the accidental genius of the other 9 people playing the game with you will blow your mind (and your chosen operator) away. I highly recommend playing with keyboard and mouse for this one using a controller puts you at serious disadvantage as there is no online aim assist in place for this game.… Expand
  23. jeanphilt
    Jul 3, 2017
    8
    It's really similar to CS:GO so if you like it, you might like R6 Siege.
    But if you are a fan of Battlefield, then this game is probably not for you.
    It's really "camping oriented" and the pace is really slow. It's limited to 5 vs 5 so it's harder to find friends to play with when compared to Battlefield. Indeed, ideally, you need 5 players, no more, not less while in Battlefield, it's    It's really similar to CS:GO so if you like it, you might like R6 Siege.
    But if you are a fan of Battlefield, then this game is probably not for you.
    It's really "camping oriented" and the pace is really slow.
    It's limited to 5 vs 5 so it's harder to find friends to play with when compared to Battlefield.
    Indeed, ideally, you need 5 players, no more, not less while in Battlefield, it's less important and you can have many squads of 5 players ...

    It's a simple multiplayer game with no real single player mode.
    I played for about 10 hours and I feel already bored by the game.
    While I think Battlefield could be more tactical, R6 is just too limited for me.
    Despite the various operators (20) and maps (15) for now, the gameplay is quite repetitive.

    Edit : after reaching level 15 and getting more used to the game and watching serenity17 videos on youtube, and playing with my team on discord, I can understand a little more what people like about this game and I've started to like it    … Expand
  24. Tomle1202
    Jul 2, 2017
    8
    Rainbow Six Siege is not the kind of game that you can love everything about, but fortunately it gives you enough moments to still appreciate its thrilling tactical gameplay.
  25. alecblaster
    Jun 19, 2017
    0
    buggy hit boxes
    non-existing hit registration
    broken matchmaking
    potato servers
    extremely high ping
    indestructible objects
    unbalanced maps and operators
    the worst net code ive ever seen
    did i mention the buggy hit boxes and non-existing hit registration?
  26. Critical-Hit
    May 30, 2017
    0
    This game is out for a year and half. And its like this:
    Hello everybody and welcome to Jackass...oh wait...sorry...welcome to Rainbow Six Siege which is quite the same. Enjoy lags, bugs, cheaters and broken hit boxes (now quite fixed). Test your internet connection in 5 vs 5 team death-match, where tactics and objective doesn't matter. Here your skill or tactical knowledge is nothing, if    This game is out for a year and half. And its like this:
    Hello everybody and welcome to Jackass...oh wait...sorry...welcome to Rainbow Six Siege which is quite the same. Enjoy lags, bugs, cheaters and broken hit boxes (now quite fixed). Test your internet connection in 5 vs 5 team death-match, where tactics and objective doesn't matter. Here your skill or tactical knowledge is nothing, if your opponent has better connection or cheats. You will be pared with players with higher or lower levels or ranks, which are not even close to yours. Enjoy your silver skill getting smashed by platins and diamods, who are really good, cheaters or ESL players with new accounts. Try all different weapons and find out, that shotguns are sniper rifles and sniper rifle does same damage as pistols. Let's kill a man (or woman) with half of the magazine from your machine gun to the head or with just 3 shots from a pistol to the body. With our anti-cheat placebo (FairFight and BattlEye) you can report who you want, because it doesn't work. You're reporting to FairFight, but BattlEye gives bans. Logic.exe not found...    … Expand
  27. Snails
    May 25, 2017
    2
    Replayability is key here. The game relies too much on multiplayer to make the game fun but its dead. As for single-player they threw in some missions that you have no control over what you want to take, such as gear, equipment, character, guns, etc. I don't even call it single-player, more of just "Look see we made offline missions now shut up." After you beat those in a few hours thereReplayability is key here. The game relies too much on multiplayer to make the game fun but its dead. As for single-player they threw in some missions that you have no control over what you want to take, such as gear, equipment, character, guns, etc. I don't even call it single-player, more of just "Look see we made offline missions now shut up." After you beat those in a few hours there is terrorist hunt mode which is just a wave survival. Don't get me wrong here its a good looking game and it plays nice but thats about it. Nothing TO PLAY. If they would have put some sort of custom missions that would have been a different story. I was expecting a lot more. Oh well back to the SWAT games.… Expand
  28. Cech
    May 16, 2017
    2
    Главная ошибка при покупке этой части R6 - думать, что вы покупаете тактический шутер.

    Игра вызывает двойственные чувства. Как тайтл R6 игра тянет на 2/10 - общего со всей серией радуги нет, развитие серии пришло к казуальщине. Что по ощущениям представляет из себя игра - call of duty.. или мод на неё Нужен ли был серии R6 мультиплеер вместо ко-оп? - Нет Было бы хорошо выпустить    Главная ошибка при покупке этой части R6 - думать, что вы покупаете тактический шутер.

    Игра вызывает двойственные чувства. Как тайтл R6 игра тянет на 2/10 - общего со всей серией радуги нет, развитие серии пришло к казуальщине. Что по ощущениям представляет из себя игра - call of duty.. или мод на неё

    Нужен ли был серии R6 мультиплеер вместо ко-оп? - Нет

    Было бы хорошо выпустить редкую за последние годы игру про полицию и их спецотряды? - Да (но не про тренирующиеся друг с другом)

    "Только мультиплеер" привёл игру к балансным вещам, которые по факту выглядят убого, вооружение и прочие девайсы даже сложно описать словом абсурд, особенно посмеялся с тачанки и прочих стволов из 43го. Скоро добавят арбалет, так что стоит ждать совместку (в рекламных целях это не редкость) с Chivalry и появления оперативника в латах с луком. Проломы стен, разрушение объектов - всё выглядит смешно, даже такая игра как контр-страйк на её фоне выглядит симулятором спецназа. А АХТУНГ: R6 был симулятором, тут ничего общего с этим, казуальщина для сельской местности

    Не известно то, что нас ждало в отменённой "Patriots", но уверенность в том, что эта игра попала "мимо" не покидает игрока. Как f2p игра и (без шуток) конкурент Warface или Point Blank неплохо, но это не ААА тайтл ни в какой вселенной, а побаловаться пару часиков можно

    2/10    … Expand
  29. DatBoiKapachino
    May 15, 2017
    10
    Siege is a pretty good game, lots of bugs tho.. this game would be 10/10 if it was bug free.... but now with Operation Health (going to fix just about everything) on the way this game is on the right path to becoming the best game ive ever played!...
  30. ShadowWarriorL
    May 5, 2017
    0
    Hey there. I’m here to give anyone that’s willing to listen my opinion on a game I’ve been playing for quite some time—Rainbow 6 Siege. I’m just going to get right to the point:
    Siege might have been the best FPS I’ve ever played, but it ends up falling so flat that it hurts. It’s one of those games that most people classify as having potential—but just to waste it and not do what    Hey there. I’m here to give anyone that’s willing to listen my opinion on a game I’ve been playing for quite some time—Rainbow 6 Siege. I’m just going to get right to the point:
    Siege might have been the best FPS I’ve ever played, but it ends up falling so flat that it hurts. It’s one of those games that most people classify as having potential—but just to waste it and not do what could’ve been done several times better. I’m not saying that Siege has to meet every single one of my expectations, or that it needs to be what I want it to be—I’m trying to say that as a game in its genre it needs to cover some bases before even trying to be an FPS.
    I’m talking about net code, fixing the issue with peekers advantage, giving spawn protection to attackers for a few seconds to protect them from spawn camping, and lastly preventing players with more latency to benefit from said latency. These are things that have a DIRECT influence in the way people play the game. It affects how each round plays out, how encounters work, and how players approach the game. If you know that you will have an advantage over someone if you peek them first, you’re more than likely going to run in and go for a peek. If you know you can get one or two picks at the very start of the round, you’re more than likely going to take the risk and take out those key ops. If you see you’re connected to a server and you’re lagging a bit—and you have peekers advantage, you’re more than likely going to run in first.
    Most people take any advantage they can get. And are they to blame? No, I can’t say they are. I myself am guilty of peeking outside, spawn killing, and rushing in. If my team is down by one, or if we’re tied up, or if the other team is outperforming us by using these things to their advantage, why am I going to take it? I won’t.
    And here is where my problem with this game really comes in: it almost forces you to accommodate your play style to these factors. Most matches play out the same way now. The same repetitious outside peeking, excessive rushing, defenders not doing their job—which is defending the objective, etc. I feel like as a player, I’ve lost the advantage in being to choose the way I play the game. I feel constrained in my choices in play-style because everything I’ve tried doesn’t work. I don’t really like the way I have to play the game now, but because it works I do it. And that’s where the game becomes just about winning and that’s where the fun factor ends for me. I try my best to only play when my friends are online as well. When they aren’t, I stick to terrorist hunt. But when they are on, they ultimately suffer the same fate—and for the most part, share the same opinion.
    Lastly, I feel like the game puts too much of a focus on adding in new operators. It is clearly an important part of the game and helps to “shift the meta”, but the season passes and the constant weapon skin additions really just detracts from what I would consider other important content. And by content I mean fixing the stuff that I’ve mentioned earlier. I’m not about to claim that I know anything and everything about how to manage a game like Siege, but from my perspective I’d shift focus.
    In summation, the problem I have with this game currently is that it lacks the foundation it needs to support its wonderful concept. It focuses too much on other things—like weapon skins and other gear—when it should be directing its focus on what makes the game function. By allowing problems like peekers advantage, spawn killing, and using latency as an advantage, the game shoots itself in the foot. It limits the player’s choices regarding play-style tremendously, and instead of building on its concept—it stunts its growth. You can’t build a house without a solid foundation.    … Expand
  31. Astroman
    Apr 30, 2017
    9
    LOVE THIS GAME!!!! Been addicted to it since the beta and i still just can't get enough. Does have some issues with the servers, hit registration, net code and some weird glitches but the problems are very fixable. The game is very competitive and is an amazing E-Sports title.

    It is a result of the countless hours of hard work, dedication and support from the developers who release    LOVE THIS GAME!!!! Been addicted to it since the beta and i still just can't get enough. Does have some issues with the servers, hit registration, net code and some weird glitches but the problems are very fixable. The game is very competitive and is an amazing E-Sports title.

    It is a result of the countless hours of hard work, dedication and support from the developers who release amazing DLCs for the game. The best part of all.... All the DLCs are completely free. The "Season Pass" just gives you a 1 week early access for the DLCs and some exclusive weapon skins, skins, headgear, charms. But most of the major things like the operators, head gears, weapon skin etc, are obtainable through ingame currency called "Reknown", and the maps are obviously free.

    The developers took a huge risk with this game and although it had a pretty rocky start, the game NOW is phenomenal. The game's player base keeps on increasing instead of decreasing, which not a lot of games these days can do. The Rainbow six community is stronger than it ever was because of the shear amount of support the developers gave to this game. Trust me, i would know, i stuck around since the beta. If it weren't for the issues i mentioned earlier, this game would've been a 10/10 for me.    … Expand
  32. Captain_Chaos
    Apr 17, 2017
    2
    A well-optimized game with a nice range of characters and abilities and extensive training missions, but that's about all it has going for it. It's marred by the traditional cripplingly low time-to-kill ratio, 1-death-and-you're-out match structure, grenade spamming, defense-oriented camping that puts the attackers at an inherent disadvantage, and of course, aggressive, insulting andA well-optimized game with a nice range of characters and abilities and extensive training missions, but that's about all it has going for it. It's marred by the traditional cripplingly low time-to-kill ratio, 1-death-and-you're-out match structure, grenade spamming, defense-oriented camping that puts the attackers at an inherent disadvantage, and of course, aggressive, insulting and unwelcoming players, even more so then most FPSs. If anything could make me nostalgic for Counter-Strike, it would be the Rainbow Six series. I actually managed to slip on the edge of a roof and fall to a downed state in an area where no one was able to revive me. Realism in games is not fun. All I can say is, I'm glad I didn't pay for this game… Expand
  33. Flipmails
    Apr 10, 2017
    6
    NOTE: THIS REVIEW ONLY APPLIES FOR THE CASUAL MULTIPLAYER MODE. I HAVE NOT EXPERINCED THE ENTIRETY OF THE GAME SO TAKE THIS WITH A GRAIN OF SALT.

    In short it is a good competitive fps with a high amount of depth (at least compared to most modern FPS games) crippled by sudden high pings, rubberbanding and random instances where the game freezes. The level design is pretty damn good,    NOTE: THIS REVIEW ONLY APPLIES FOR THE CASUAL MULTIPLAYER MODE. I HAVE NOT EXPERINCED THE ENTIRETY OF THE GAME SO TAKE THIS WITH A GRAIN OF SALT.

    In short it is a good competitive fps with a high amount of depth (at least compared to most modern FPS games) crippled by sudden high pings, rubberbanding and random instances where the game freezes.

    The level design is pretty damn good, with blind spots usually containing breakeable walls/windows that disencourage enemies from camping. At the same time, because deaths come so fast, rushing through the map in an attempt to achieve the highest possible body count is also a terrible idea.

    Another interasting feature present in the game are the cameras and drones. The cameras allow the defending team to spot enemies and mark their location on the map, which helps to alleviate the lack of minimap, something that wouldn't fit what this game is trying to do anyway. Meanwhile, the drones give the attackers a safe way to see if there are any enemies ahead without exposing themselves to danger.

    Teamworking is also an important part of the game but that also has its fair share of problems. For starters, at least in the casual mode, there is no punishment for quiting in the middle of a match, usually resulting in numeric disadvantage that can end up in a round loss that could otherwise be reasonable avoided. A 20 minute ban for quiting would have been a simple and efficient solution since players that had something urgent to do would not be overly punished for leaving the game, while the ones who exited just because they felt like it would be forced to sit in the corner doing nothing for almost half an hour. Balancing is also another issue as it is not uncommon to have a level 20 player in the same team as a guy that has played the game for 200 hours.

    Had the the balancing and quiting being the only problems present in this product I would not have given it such a mediocre score, so let's get to the bigger factors preventing this from being a great video game.

    Now, I wouldn't mind microtransactions if they were only applied to cosmetics but that is obviously not the case. There are 28 unlockable operators in this game and their price varies from 12500 to 25000 points, which means that if you are not willing to put extra money into the game you will have to play for at least 700 hours in the best case scenario. And keep in mind that the only operator that can be selected by more than 1 player is the recruit, who also happens to be the most useless class in the game. So if you want to have a good time with your buddies who just bought the game you may as well just go play something else. Even for a $15 dollar game I find this absolutely outrageous.

    However, what kills the game for me are technical issues that I don't seem to have any control over. For some god forsaken reason I will suddenly go backwards 5 meters while I am reading to the objective, or maybe the game will freeze for about 3 seconds even though my ping is at 80. Speaking of ping, what is up with the random connection spikes? I swear to god the game sometimes jumps from 60 to 3000 for no apparent reason.

    All in all Rainbow Six SIege is refreshing FPS that rewards thought, planning and strategy more than quick reflexes and good aim. Unfortunately said game is hindered by technical issues and an abusive microtransaction system. Oh, I almost forgot, it also requires the installation of Uplay.    … Expand
  34. Roke_
    Mar 23, 2017
    9
    The multiplayer is fantastic as it creates tension in matches and has its own ranked system which is very good also the operator system is very good as you have to be careful who you choose so you can play and setup attacks or defences also it is much better with friend also the game will bring you back every day/week as there are daily challenges and weekly challenges but if theThe multiplayer is fantastic as it creates tension in matches and has its own ranked system which is very good also the operator system is very good as you have to be careful who you choose so you can play and setup attacks or defences also it is much better with friend also the game will bring you back every day/week as there are daily challenges and weekly challenges but if the situations is supposed to be a campaign it is a complete fail as it is a sorry excuse for a campaign so hopefully it can be added but the multiplayer and terrorist hunts save this game to a big extent.… Expand
  35. WhiteRice1526
    Mar 16, 2017
    10
    Ive put thousands of hours into cod bo2, bo3, bf3, bf4, bf1, and insurgency. At around 5-9 months I would get bored playing said game every afternoon and would continue on to something else. R6S is a different story entirely. I bought this game at launch and have not been able to stop playing. 1.5 years later and I am excited to see a tweet showing the new patch notes. If you love tacticalIve put thousands of hours into cod bo2, bo3, bf3, bf4, bf1, and insurgency. At around 5-9 months I would get bored playing said game every afternoon and would continue on to something else. R6S is a different story entirely. I bought this game at launch and have not been able to stop playing. 1.5 years later and I am excited to see a tweet showing the new patch notes. If you love tactical and or fps games, this is what you NEED.… Expand
  36. Ramudo
    Mar 16, 2017
    10
    Rainbow Six Siege was an extremely controversial game at launch. It had bad matchmaking, hit registration, a small amount of micro-transactions and hackers. It was a god damned mess. A few months went by where the player base was staying at around the amount it was around launch, probably dropping bit by bit. Then, the first DLC hit. Black Ice. Two operators were released along with aRainbow Six Siege was an extremely controversial game at launch. It had bad matchmaking, hit registration, a small amount of micro-transactions and hackers. It was a god damned mess. A few months went by where the player base was staying at around the amount it was around launch, probably dropping bit by bit. Then, the first DLC hit. Black Ice. Two operators were released along with a large amount of patches. But, in the process, more smaller bugs came along. More months went by as each DLC released. (Might I mention that all of this DLC is completely free.) More patches fixing more and more, improving the games life and popularity. Now, here in 2017, Ubisoft has managed to pull my favorite game out of the trash and reform it into something different. Something that a large community of people now love. There are major patches in between and on DLC releases. An anti-cheat system was implemented was has eradicated 99.99% of hackers. All the bugs that have majorly and minorly affected this game have been fixed and they have also given another FREE year of content. Their main priorities ATM are hit registration and matchmaking. Even though this game had a almost completely failed launch, Ubisoft has stuck with the game and turned it into a rare success story where the game community is not sinking, yet raising instead. This game is amazing don't get me wrong, but it does have some minor bugs that will not always affect gameplay. It requires patience and skill unlike many other shooters. The developers also occasionally put a $15 version of the full game on the store for those interested in trying the game. It is the full game as I said before, yet requires more grinding, which seems a fair trade for literally 70% off of the game. Finally, mind a large majority of the game reviews if you are interested in the game. They were made back in the game's **** release days and are nowhere near accurate. Give this game a shot if you will. Great Community as well. It is totally worth your time.… Expand
  37. TresDelConway
    Mar 15, 2017
    9
    THIS IS THE BEST SHOOTER CREATED IN YEARS. My only complaints are the server issues from time to time, and character change choices that the developers make, Glaz's new buff for instance is completely overpowered and removes the skill of using his character as target acquisition with him now is like an easter egg hunt in a whitewashed room.
  38. eyeluvop
    Mar 15, 2017
    9
    Incredible game.
    Easily the best, most competitive online shooter in the market. Hard to get into for newcomers no doubt, but once you get the hang of it, you won't find a better, more intense shooter out there.
  39. Patrickyayo
    Mar 14, 2017
    3
    HUGE disappointment if you were looking for something similar to any of the games in this franchise, It's okay if you want something extremely repetitive and lacking any depth or strategy.

    This should've been RS Patriots.
  40. AfroOPanda
    Mar 7, 2017
    10
    An excellent FPS that brings back the teamwork and the communication in the center of its gameplay. It is so important to share intel with your teammate. And the game provides lots of tools to do gather it. Camera, drone, gadgets for example. The sound in the game is also crucial so be sure you have a good headset..
    Maps are very good and you can destroy so many elements to shape the    An excellent FPS that brings back the teamwork and the communication in the center of its gameplay. It is so important to share intel with your teammate. And the game provides lots of tools to do gather it. Camera, drone, gadgets for example. The sound in the game is also crucial so be sure you have a good headset..
    Maps are very good and you can destroy so many elements to shape the round as you want. That brings incredible variety to matches with literally an infinite number of possible configuration with the range of operators, maps and the destruction possibilities.
    The weapons feel good. You can customize the loadout of all the operators. Operators are pretty well balanced overall. They bring a lot of variety to the gameplay (instead of playing M4, AWP or AK all day).
    My best FPS experience so far, made me quit CS:GO. 10/10 (could be 9 because of some bugs because hell it deserves more than a 7).    … Expand
  41. laimer_pro
    Mar 6, 2017
    0
    Игра во многом ещё не доработана , там не везде можно залезть на крышу с помощью каната , много возможностей нельзя использовать , большой пинг к тому же , графика уровень 2001 год /
  42. The_BlueRose
    Feb 6, 2017
    7
    Good strategic-shooter game.

    Graphically can be improved.

    The operators are original but some of them have useless gadgets.

    The game requieres lot of hours to know every spot and camera locations, wich makes it a noob-unfriendly game and frustrating new players.
  43. tacticalsmitty
    Jan 22, 2017
    1
    So many things wrongs with this game to list here but I'll list a few. First, the G** D*** suicide bombers are the most annoying aspect of any shooter I think I've ever played. Second, where's the customization we had in previous games like Rogue Spear? Can only use mp5 for defense? Are you kidding me Ubisoft? How freaking stupid is this?. This game is awful. It just makes me wish forSo many things wrongs with this game to list here but I'll list a few. First, the G** D*** suicide bombers are the most annoying aspect of any shooter I think I've ever played. Second, where's the customization we had in previous games like Rogue Spear? Can only use mp5 for defense? Are you kidding me Ubisoft? How freaking stupid is this?. This game is awful. It just makes me wish for classics like Rogue Spear. How about a reboot of that great game guys? I miss the truly open maps of your classics and the ability to use any weapon in the arsenal. What were you guys thinking?
    This game is just awful. Don't reward companies for garbage like this like I did. Regret spending money on this garbage.    … Expand
  44. hishark12345
    Jan 21, 2017
    0
    This game has potential, but completely fails at match-making and bugs. Don't buy this pile of trash. There are too many bugs, gltiches, bad hit registration, and just poor math-making.
  45. bagolykiraly
    Jan 4, 2017
    3
    Well where should i start?Hmm maybe with the netcode because its buggy as hell.Or with the fact that the servers are unstable and the game is annoying to play with.Lets talk about the graphics well its medicore at best but dont add anything to the games appeal.The community is toxic and plagged with hackers.Or with the balance of the game.The character design and their abilities are reallyWell where should i start?Hmm maybe with the netcode because its buggy as hell.Or with the fact that the servers are unstable and the game is annoying to play with.Lets talk about the graphics well its medicore at best but dont add anything to the games appeal.The community is toxic and plagged with hackers.Or with the balance of the game.The character design and their abilities are really cool and awsome but in reality some are overpowered and some are usless or just weak in general.Im not a big fan of "realistic" fps games but i played with arma and other fps games that required a lot of skill to play(im not saying that im a pro at fps videogames).In this game you dont need that much skill but a **** ton of luck because sometimes your bullets kill people instantly but usually they wonder off in to the other side of the room where is no enemy to be found and there is so many "spots" on the map where you get insta killed and you dont have a chance to counter.The maps are horrible and boring after a couple of rounds.Overall i dont know what ubisoft wanted with this game they tried to make a hardcore reallistic fps game but they failed miserably with mechanics which are for the call of duty type gamers.I cant recommend this game at all. (sorry for bad english not a native speaker)… Expand
  46. juliiouse
    Jan 2, 2017
    7
    Rainbow Six: Siege fits a missing hole in multiplayer FPS games of which I've been searching for quite some time: a hardcore, squad based close quarters experience. You may be thinking that Counterstrike offers this too, but the experiences are very different.

    Rainbow Six Siege provides a very interesting dynamic between the two teams: the defenders hold a position of extreme control    Rainbow Six: Siege fits a missing hole in multiplayer FPS games of which I've been searching for quite some time: a hardcore, squad based close quarters experience. You may be thinking that Counterstrike offers this too, but the experiences are very different.

    Rainbow Six Siege provides a very interesting dynamic between the two teams: the defenders hold a position of extreme control over the attackers, who spend their time slowly wresting control from the defenders, either through direct confrontation or taking their resources apart.

    The difference between the two teams is striking: the defenders have access to fixed position CCTV that offers a huge amount of visibility in a fixed-- and easily destroyed position-- whilst the attackers have access to drones, which offer mobile visibility but from the level of a small rodent, affording the attackers less direct information but the ability to see any part of the area. The defenders are given time to set traps, put up barricades and attempt to funnel the movements of the attackers into specific chokepoints, whilst the attackers are given flashbangs, explosives and longer range weapons to shoot into the buildings.

    This set up creates a lot of tension, as defenders feel like homeowners experiencing a break in whilst the attacking team feel like unwelcome invaders in a hostile world, which has helped to create one of the most intense multiplayer experiences I've had in a while.

    The slower, more methodical pace required by both sides and reliance on information and teamwork creates a solid experience, but one which requires a few friends and a teamspeak/discord server. Playing which a matchmade team just does not work as well, as many will be averse to using the microphone and so information is not distributed to the team fast enough.

    Graphically, the game is serviceable: weapons tear up scenery, explosions and smoke pop off all around you and lights reflect across the floor as you make your way through the match. This is great, but the graphics can sometimes feel a little flat, which can make distinguishing between the many different operators relatively difficult.

    The audio design is where the game comes into it's own. You will quickly find yourself relying on the various sounds heard throughout the level, from the zipping noise of a rappel to the heavy footed running of an enemy above you locating the objective. All of these instill a sense in more experience players and create some very tense moments: in a recent game I was sprinting toward a hostage when the floor below and wall to the side of me erupted into a hell of bullets as two enemies had picked up my footsteps.

    The destructible environments of the game are top-notch. Walls blow apart, barricades are destroyed and hastily rebuilt and bullets fly through soft surfaces, creating another level to the map design and engagements felt throughout.

    Though the game is not perfect due to difficulties playing when friends are not around and the graphics can make things less clear than they could be, I would still recommend picking this game up in any sale.    … Expand
  47. sjaqiel
    Dec 29, 2016
    0
    This game was fun (respect between players) but now the community exist only of trollers cheaters and teamkillers. Netcode is the worst I have seen in a video game. If you search for a good FPS skip this piece of **** (less headache).
  48. BWAHBWAHBWAH
    Dec 28, 2016
    8
    I enjoy this game very much. I have been playing since the open beta and forward. It involves a lot of strategy and has some of the cleanest gunplay I have ever experienced. Time to kill is realistic, and when people are shot in the head, it's a kill, not blood splatter with an injury. Every life counts on the team, if you are faced with a 4v5 you are at a noticeable disadvantage butI enjoy this game very much. I have been playing since the open beta and forward. It involves a lot of strategy and has some of the cleanest gunplay I have ever experienced. Time to kill is realistic, and when people are shot in the head, it's a kill, not blood splatter with an injury. Every life counts on the team, if you are faced with a 4v5 you are at a noticeable disadvantage but through solid teamwork you can still win. I believe this game did not get enough credit for what it is, because its published by Ubisoft, and 2016 had a plethora of underwhelming shooters. After it's initial release with issues of lag and issues with hit detection, it also got many negative reviews. Almost all of the issues have been fixed and what makes this game good has been polished and made better. R6 is getting another year of support and I'm pretty sure it's fan base will grow rather than diminish like other multiplayer FPS games. The microtransactions within the game can be completely ignored as they are only used for aesthetics. It is however a little bit disheartening for the ratio you pay for the skins. 10$ will go almost nowhere within the games microtransaction system, the skins are extremely expensive for no reason. I don't know anyone willing to pay almost 8$ for a singular skin. The principle alone brought my score from a 10 to an 8. The rest of the game is great and I recommend it to anyone into the FPS genre.… Expand
  49. CDM34
    Dec 22, 2016
    1
    A glitch fulled horrible mess. Hackers shooting through walls with a terrible anti-hack system. I've even seen people flying. On xbox one I wrote a good review but on PC this is just terrible.
  50. ihateubisoft
    Dec 21, 2016
    5
    A game that is:
    + giving you a little chance for playing tactical
    + really not bad, if there wheren't things like: It is really, really bugged as hell laggy as **** (80+ ping always, but a normal ping of 39-40) it does have the most unfair matchmaking system I have ever witnessed. It kinda sucks for beginners. Really, it just sucks for beginners. Don't argue about that. Even    A game that is:
    + giving you a little chance for playing tactical
    + really not bad, if there wheren't things like:

    It is really, really bugged as hell
    laggy as **** (80+ ping always, but a normal ping of 39-40)
    it does have the most unfair matchmaking system I have ever witnessed.

    It kinda sucks for beginners.
    Really, it just sucks for beginners. Don't argue about that.
    Even with Singeplayer Tut.
    This game could be so much, but Ubisoft just ruined it by hosting ****ty servers.    … Expand
  51. Mjr_REAPER
    Dec 18, 2016
    6
    The game is ok, unfortunately, is not as good as the previous views. By focusing on the multiplayer game I have the impression that the game looks like CS. The main problems with the game that cause discomfort while playing this: server lags, high ping, bugs, lack of cooperation with other players unless you play with your friends, there may be problems with the optimization model damageThe game is ok, unfortunately, is not as good as the previous views. By focusing on the multiplayer game I have the impression that the game looks like CS. The main problems with the game that cause discomfort while playing this: server lags, high ping, bugs, lack of cooperation with other players unless you play with your friends, there may be problems with the optimization model damage floors and ceilings is very limited, the system DLC gives to be desired a lot of things every year new season pass Ubisoft seriously. Although the DLC is free, we can use the currency in the game to unlock new operators, however, the price of each operator is set so that the player took x hours forcing it to buy season pass that guarantees instant access to operators.… Expand
  52. kingog
    Dec 2, 2016
    6
    The Game is okay, but this Dlc´s System not, Season Pass 2 ?!?!?! wtf is going on, i paid for an game that has 2 game modes (Locker-Ranked)an F2P has more Modes than this, and now they will bring season pass 2 ?! i thought they will make the GAME BIGGER, with Team- Deathmatch etc...... but one mode for an paid game is poor.....
  53. Necrolexicon
    Dec 1, 2016
    9
    I was a massive fan of Rainbow Six Vegas 1&2 and would play terrorist hunt coop online for hours with a group of close friends. Siege reintroduces me to the Terrorist Hunt as well as adding new online multiplayer mechanics and small bite sized single player scenarios to complete. If your a fan Vegas 1 or 2 then this will satisfy your needs.
  54. zetsss
    Nov 23, 2016
    1
    I don't know why so many guys still playing this game.
    this game got a buggy net-code and update is little as tail of mouse.
    ubisoft locked all around the bugs in this game. I can't believe how this game has pro league? + Great personalities on characters + Small size tactics - Sensitive and unstable servers (Net-code) - awful DLC policy - little amount of update - so many bugs    I don't know why so many guys still playing this game.
    this game got a buggy net-code and update is little as tail of mouse.
    ubisoft locked all around the bugs in this game. I can't believe how this game has pro league?
    + Great personalities on characters
    + Small size tactics
    - Sensitive and unstable servers (Net-code)
    - awful DLC policy
    - little amount of update
    - so many bugs (body coming out from the wall and stuttering issues and Etc)
    - bad team balancing
    - repeating gameplay
    - bad balancing (especially from DLC's)
    - Bad hit detections    … Expand
  55. itspizzatom
    Nov 14, 2016
    9
    R6: Siege is an excellent multiplayer throwback to the classic Rainbow Six games. Between layers of team strategy, deep and satisfying systems, cutting-edge and game changing physics that turn the very walls into temporary cover, and a shooting model that favors patience and surprise over anything, this game makes competent players feel like counter-terror operatives, and makes the climbR6: Siege is an excellent multiplayer throwback to the classic Rainbow Six games. Between layers of team strategy, deep and satisfying systems, cutting-edge and game changing physics that turn the very walls into temporary cover, and a shooting model that favors patience and surprise over anything, this game makes competent players feel like counter-terror operatives, and makes the climb up to competency exciting. My only issue with the game has to do with a lackluster bot mode that does not faithfully make the game enjoyable offline. However, combining the deep and satisfying gameplay with free and constant support from the devs and a lively community, I highly recommend this game to anyone who likes team-based games like Battlefield or Overwatch and want something slower, or anyone who is looking for a throwback to Rainbow SIx 3.… Expand
  56. fevid
    Oct 25, 2016
    3
    Great Gameplay, Aweful Bugs, I Dont Want to Say What Bugs are Cause they aint few!
    But They Are Super annoying and piss me off, Most of The Times its Unplayable cause of Bugs!
    sometimes i cant aim, im system is glitchy and i got to restart the game and hope it fixed! Hate Ubisoft and all Its Games, Dont Buy anything from Ubisoft!!!!! Pity that i paid them to get this crap game specialy    Great Gameplay, Aweful Bugs, I Dont Want to Say What Bugs are Cause they aint few!
    But They Are Super annoying and piss me off, Most of The Times its Unplayable cause of Bugs!
    sometimes i cant aim, im system is glitchy and i got to restart the game and hope it fixed!
    Hate Ubisoft and all Its Games, Dont Buy anything from Ubisoft!!!!!
    Pity that i paid them to get this crap game specialy that i bought GOLD!    … Expand
  57. six3onei
    Oct 11, 2016
    8
    I like the game, I really enjoy playing it, if you can get it on sale buy it. I have issues with that netcode and lag... In this game tho, if you have a 200 to 300 ping you have a peak advantage over the low ping players and you can own them a lot easier. I'm not sure if the Dev's really care. Thanks for reading.
  58. Allwanz0r
    Oct 2, 2016
    8
    Rainbow six siege is a really fun game which sticks out from most regular fps-games. The classes are a nice addition and it is a very competitive game overall. Single player/players vs bots aspect of this game feels a bit lacking. The fun factor deeply connects with map awareness and learning the game.
  59. Lederzwerg
    Oct 1, 2016
    0
    - bad ranked system
    - bad hit detection
    - server issues
    - monotonous gameplay
    - high number of different bugs
    - stupid and imbalanced matchmaking
    - bad balancing
  60. Sayoblade
    Sep 19, 2016
    9
    TL;DR version: Give me this game over generic shooters ANY day!

    I've never been a twitch gamer, and online TDM games have nearly always left me discouraged, but R6 can be played as anything from a very slow tactical game, using the environment and your gadgets to counter and outwit your enemies, to a fast paced shooter; the amazing thing is, the two work wonderfully well together,    TL;DR version: Give me this game over generic shooters ANY day!

    I've never been a twitch gamer, and online TDM games have nearly always left me discouraged, but R6 can be played as anything from a very slow tactical game, using the environment and your gadgets to counter and outwit your enemies, to a fast paced shooter; the amazing thing is, the two work wonderfully well together, without giving a clear advantage to one or the other.

    A great FPS-er can run and gun, using his quick attacks to prevent a tactical player from countering fast enough, while a tactician will have traps and counters, often using the destructible environment to prevent a frontal assault.

    The use of "rock paper scissors" operatives giving advantages and countering the advantages of other operatives makes games unpredictable and often very interesting and fresh.
    Teams of players working together can have a HUGE advantage, but since I play only random matches I can say the game is still incredibly fun without a group of friends playing with you.
    The community is a mixed bag ranging from helpful and instructive to downright toxic, but mostly being a good place in the middle..

    Technically, R6 isn't perfect, matches take 0.5-2 minutes to join, and dropping out of a match happens (even if rarely), cheating is STILL an issue (even if it's rarer these days), and lag can be an issue, but overall playing this on a high-end laptop over wifi, I hardly ever experience connection problems.    … Expand
  61. JimmyDeeAeen
    Sep 19, 2016
    0
    Game Blew harder than Mount St. Helen in 1980...

    ....................................................................................................
  62. leungkevin24
    Sep 16, 2016
    8
    Although not without its problems, Rainbow SIx Siege is still an extremely fun, tactical and hardcore fps which is one of its kind, offering tense moments of suspense or pure gunfight skill play.
  63. Aron08
    Aug 15, 2016
    10
    Absolutely fantastic game. As I read in another review, it's a "thinking man's shooter" for sure. The maps are destructible, forcing creativity in both defensive and offensive roles; the unique abilities of each operator only serve to enhance the experience, serving up a metagame not unlike what you'd find in the MOBA genre - although with more meaty action. Essentially, if the olderAbsolutely fantastic game. As I read in another review, it's a "thinking man's shooter" for sure. The maps are destructible, forcing creativity in both defensive and offensive roles; the unique abilities of each operator only serve to enhance the experience, serving up a metagame not unlike what you'd find in the MOBA genre - although with more meaty action. Essentially, if the older Rainbow Six games, CS: GO and Dota were all merged into one, that would be Siege.

    There are customisable loadouts, attachments to add to your weapons, completely altering their statistics (recoil, flash hiders, angled grips giving you quicker ADS transitions etc.). If you like competitive multiplayer games, you're doing yourself a disservice by not trying it out. In my opinion, this is now the only competitive shooter worth playing. Period. The maps, too, are full of detail with so many avenues to explore and ways to breach your objective.

    I'd advise playing with friends, however, or at least using a mic as this game is heavily team-oriented and you will certainly suffer playing online without one.

    --

    That said, it's not perfect. There are a few issues such as semi-auto shotguns having too much range, a couple silly operator buffs such as Pulse's heartbeat scanner - but all in all, this game is fantastic. Surprisingly, the devs have given it patch after patch - something you definitely don't expect from Ubisoft, considering their post-release support generally leaves much to be desired. So for this reason, I have no doubt everything will be sorted (Pulse and semi-autos get nerfed this month so the perfect game will then become godlike).

    Kudos to the community manager, 'Its_Epi' as well, for being as responsive and communicative as his position allows.    … Expand
  64. afex
    Aug 13, 2016
    0
    Hit registration issues still exists after so much updates, mach making is lotery, sometimes you cant see enemy in enviroment textures, very ping dependand game. The game can be great in not GREADYsoft.
  65. DJ_Casper
    Aug 12, 2016
    10
    This is an amazing game with elements where CSS was not able to achieve. Current CSGO is very poor vs dynamics and tactics from R6: Siege. I highly recommend R6: Siege. Every new DLC with operators brings new tactics and new style of the game in general
  66. ULTRA_MARIO_10
    Aug 7, 2016
    7
    So... tom clancys rainbow six seige Is it good? Let's find out.

    Story- There's no campaign in the game Presentation- 6/10 Ok but nothing mind blowing. Graphics-5.4/10 The graphics are okay, even at ultra settings the graphics are nothing huge and amazing but still mediocre Sound/Music-7/10 The music is mediocre but I like the sound in this game. Options-7.1/10 There is    So... tom clancys rainbow six seige Is it good? Let's find out.

    Story-
    There's no campaign in the game

    Presentation- 6/10
    Ok but nothing mind blowing.

    Graphics-5.4/10
    The graphics are okay, even at ultra settings the graphics are nothing huge and amazing but still mediocre

    Sound/Music-7/10
    The music is mediocre but I like the sound in this game.

    Options-7.1/10
    There is a good amount of options in this game you could change up like the graphics and the monitor you want the game to run in.

    Online functionality-7.9/10
    It's actually pretty good, you can make your own game or join a casual game or a ranked game when you reach level 20.

    Gameplay- 8/10
    It's a pretty fun game with explosions and rappels but I don't like how there's not team deathmatch or capture the flag
    and no campaign but it is pretty fun if you're good at online FPS games.

    Lasting appeal-6/10
    Meh... It's not a game I would play most of the time

    Verdict- Adding up everything that this game has, I think i'm pretty fair at giving it a...

    7/10.(Good)    … Expand
  67. Star_Wolf
    Jul 11, 2016
    6
    I had really big hopes for this game. Rainbow Six: Siege is just another moneymaker for Ubisoft. Don't get me wrong, RS6 is a very solid and good game, but the whole Operatives thing is just destroying it! I wanted to see character and load-out customisation like in RS: Vegas 2, but better. I wanted to see a tactical experience like in SWAT4 or previous RS games, but with total destructionI had really big hopes for this game. Rainbow Six: Siege is just another moneymaker for Ubisoft. Don't get me wrong, RS6 is a very solid and good game, but the whole Operatives thing is just destroying it! I wanted to see character and load-out customisation like in RS: Vegas 2, but better. I wanted to see a tactical experience like in SWAT4 or previous RS games, but with total destruction (pfft, even indi game DUE PROCESS did better in ALPHA). I'm upset. Played it for 10 hours and forgot about even buying it… Expand
  68. Unterwaffel
    Jul 5, 2016
    1
    This game made so much fun until the new Operator came out.... Frost was a really op char because her shotgun killed everything. They nerfed her shotgun and everything was fine again until the Blackbeard came out... he is the most overpowered character ever...
  69. Psychocist
    Jun 11, 2016
    4
    I hardly ever write reviews, but felt compelled to after [thankfully] buying this game for only £12 on Steam. The destruction is great, and I'm sure it is a decent tactical shooter, but the gun play itself leaves a lot to be desired.

    Do not buy this expecting a successor to Vegas-style gameplay. There isn't much to do beyond the siege game type. Terrorist hunt is shockingly bad, almost    I hardly ever write reviews, but felt compelled to after [thankfully] buying this game for only £12 on Steam. The destruction is great, and I'm sure it is a decent tactical shooter, but the gun play itself leaves a lot to be desired.

    Do not buy this expecting a successor to Vegas-style gameplay. There isn't much to do beyond the siege game type. Terrorist hunt is shockingly bad, almost every entrance is blocked and you have to breach - no opening doors here.

    If you want something a littler spicier than camping inside small rooms, you're out of luck. No deathmatch, no team deathmatch, once you're dead in siege, you're dead and left waiting. No server browser, crappy matchmaking.

    I find the lack of variety in gameplay surprising considering how easy it would be to throw a few people on a map and let them shoot it out. If you're expecting ANYTHING like the previous instalments, you will be sorely disappointed.    … Expand
  70. smith
    Jun 8, 2016
    0
    Tom Clancy is turning in his grave. I'm not sure who took over when Tom Clancy passed away but they are doing an awful job trying to cash in on the legendary writers name. Tom always wanted his name to represent quality and that is why Rainbow Six was always known as a special forces simulator. Every time I played it since childhood I had a blast. Rainbow six is the sole reason that fueledTom Clancy is turning in his grave. I'm not sure who took over when Tom Clancy passed away but they are doing an awful job trying to cash in on the legendary writers name. Tom always wanted his name to represent quality and that is why Rainbow Six was always known as a special forces simulator. Every time I played it since childhood I had a blast. Rainbow six is the sole reason that fueled my interest in military life and eventually led me to serve my country.

    This game has nothing from Rainbow Six series :(    … Expand
  71. Shadow1
    Jun 7, 2016
    8
    Bad Game . Graphics is terrible for 2015, storyline is normal, but not really good and I not really like Rainbow Six Series, but I like Rainbow Six Vegas and Rainbow Six Vegas 2 because this games has got good storyline and really awesome graphics for 2006-2008, but I don't like this game . I thought this game will be the best game from Ubisoft, because Ubisoft making cool videos andBad Game . Graphics is terrible for 2015, storyline is normal, but not really good and I not really like Rainbow Six Series, but I like Rainbow Six Vegas and Rainbow Six Vegas 2 because this games has got good storyline and really awesome graphics for 2006-2008, but I don't like this game . I thought this game will be the best game from Ubisoft, because Ubisoft making cool videos and trailers with awesome graphics, but doing games with other graphics (not really good), but in Watch Dogs, Far Cry 4 and The Division are normal graphics . I don't like Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege and I think this is worst game in series .… Expand
  72. Diogocorreia
    Jun 6, 2016
    9
    Eu particularmente achei um ótimo jogo, estava faltando jogo de estrategia de FPS, ótimos cenários, não tem hackers, o modo anti terrorista é muito bom também, porem não se encontra mais pessoas pra jogar, os servidores que algumas vezes falha, mas sempre estão lotados de pessoas, conectou e muitas vezes voce já é direcionado imediatamente para uma partida ou uma equipe que vai começar.Eu particularmente achei um ótimo jogo, estava faltando jogo de estrategia de FPS, ótimos cenários, não tem hackers, o modo anti terrorista é muito bom também, porem não se encontra mais pessoas pra jogar, os servidores que algumas vezes falha, mas sempre estão lotados de pessoas, conectou e muitas vezes voce já é direcionado imediatamente para uma partida ou uma equipe que vai começar.
    recomendadíssimo.    … Expand
  73. Xon
    Jun 5, 2016
    8
    The good: Interesting gameplay, tense matches, great graphics, addictive and different every time.
    The Bad: Match making is awful. Low level gamers getting owned by high-level gamers, constantly. If you are a casual gamer, forget it.
  74. LordZ_
    May 30, 2016
    5
    Good looking game, but multiplayer is not that fun because net code is in beta ... and take an hour to have a game
    There's no real solo campain and no coop (only bot).
    Well if u like Rainbow SIX stuff don't buy it.
  75. Skullking3436
    May 28, 2016
    8
    I have 72 hours put into this game, the game gets your heart beating fast in certain situations. The game requires your brain to be used. You need to plan and execute with your team. The different operators really expand the game with their different gadgets and such.

    The game does have a steep learning curve for new players who are more used to the run and gun type shooters like COD.    I have 72 hours put into this game, the game gets your heart beating fast in certain situations. The game requires your brain to be used. You need to plan and execute with your team. The different operators really expand the game with their different gadgets and such.

    The game does have a steep learning curve for new players who are more used to the run and gun type shooters like COD. But once you master the game, it's super fun to play. Though there are minor problems like weird netcode, and people's body sticking through walls making them an easy kill for enemies.

    But Ubisoft seems to be improving the game constantly with new patches and content. And that's what I like about them.    … Expand
  76. Franky76
    May 24, 2016
    2
    The gameplay is brilliant. But see how i noted the game ? The technical side shows how bad is Ubisoft at making PVP FPS.
    No mistake here, i love the idea of the game, i love the way it plays.
    Unfortunately, the hit detection is bad, the ping compensation is the worst i've seen in a FPS, the MM is regularly failing, and the anti-cheat is not working. Ubisoft does not communicate with    The gameplay is brilliant. But see how i noted the game ? The technical side shows how bad is Ubisoft at making PVP FPS.
    No mistake here, i love the idea of the game, i love the way it plays.

    Unfortunately, the hit detection is bad, the ping compensation is the worst i've seen in a FPS, the MM is regularly failing, and the anti-cheat is not working.
    Ubisoft does not communicate with the community, and they probably won't improve much the game since the engine is not made for FPS games.

    My conclusion... it could have been brilliant and a major game, and now it's dying. Sad.    … Expand
  77. hasuan
    May 22, 2016
    0
    This game has:
    - the worst matchmating system I have ever seen
    - teamkillers - no possibility to report teamkillers - unbalanced maps (in some areas there are 7 windows + doors to get in, so its quite impossible to defend with a random team, in others there is only one door) - dlc characters are sighty op ( oh wow you can unlock them with ingame money, just invest 30h gameplay for    This game has:
    - the worst matchmating system I have ever seen
    - teamkillers
    - no possibility to report teamkillers
    - unbalanced maps (in some areas there are 7 windows + doors to get in, so its quite impossible to defend with a random team, in others there is only one door)
    - dlc characters are sighty op ( oh wow you can unlock them with ingame money, just invest 30h gameplay for each of them)    … Expand
  78. davidd9
    May 16, 2016
    10
    i love this game is very good
    not like cod or battle this game is close to reallty
    if you like hardcore teamwork games, this is high up that tree. I'd suggest you join a clan because pubbing alone is not a viable option
  79. Brackzillar
    May 13, 2016
    8
    Really good FPS, require thinking and strategy to topple opponents. The only problem I have is with body lag and hackers but they seem to at least be trying with the newest update. I will always appreciate more patches from this game.
  80. widneySILVA
    Apr 18, 2016
    10
    Jogo muito bacana, tem uma jogabilidade um pouco diferente pra quem joga BF4 ou outro FPS mais depois de um tempo vc ja acostuma e fica muito legal, ainda mais quando usada as táticas de invasão militar, sem falar nos graficos e cutscenes que ta muito show....recomendo!
  81. amoroco369
    Apr 15, 2016
    9
    I love siege .a. o . sorry I love all ubi-soft games but this game is very better think tools aim gun tactics and so think .. shoot the head i like t his ..or good graphic and maps
  82. ad0mas
    Apr 14, 2016
    10
    My personal GOTY of 2015. Got over 220 hours in it and can stop playing. its amazing, but would be even greater if it had more content coming through.
  83. Stukazufuss
    Apr 12, 2016
    1
    Worst PVP game ever. Almost every kill is a Headshot, dont care about the logic, you just shoot in enemy direction and he dies. Sometimes the enemy dont appear on your screen while the enemy is looking in the room since 1 sec so you die without have any chance. Last game i bought from Ubi$oft, the biggest **** game ever without any server in middle europe, pings always over 50, lagWorst PVP game ever. Almost every kill is a Headshot, dont care about the logic, you just shoot in enemy direction and he dies. Sometimes the enemy dont appear on your screen while the enemy is looking in the room since 1 sec so you die without have any chance. Last game i bought from Ubi$oft, the biggest **** game ever without any server in middle europe, pings always over 50, lag compensation. A wannabe tactic game with so many bugs, that i prefer ArmA more than this.… Expand
  84. Dobian
    Apr 11, 2016
    6
    Way back in 1998 I bought this game called Rainbow Six at CostCo. It looked pretty cool, but when I loaded it up the first time I was blown away. The ability to plan missions and manage a team, set waypoints and go codes and rules of engagement. I was in heaven, and spent hours drawing up the perfect plan to rescue a hostage or diffuse a bomb.

    I would go on to play Rogue Spear and Raven    Way back in 1998 I bought this game called Rainbow Six at CostCo. It looked pretty cool, but when I loaded it up the first time I was blown away. The ability to plan missions and manage a team, set waypoints and go codes and rules of engagement. I was in heaven, and spent hours drawing up the perfect plan to rescue a hostage or diffuse a bomb.

    I would go on to play Rogue Spear and Raven Shield and the series just got better. Then it started to go downhill, with future iterations like Lockdown lacking the depth and quality of their predecessors. So along comes Siege and on one level it not only meets but exceeds the game mechanics of previous Rainbow Six titles in a big way. But on another level it falls way short, simply because UbiSoft's emphasis is on drawing in the multiplayer crowd (i.e., young console gamers). So there is no single player campaign, you have no bots to manage, no planning phase. There is minimal support for co-op. You can't control mission parameters like the time limit, number of enemies, map, mission type, number of rounds. You simply get a random map with a random mission type for whatever your chosen difficulty is. There is also no map editor so you must make do with the official maps provided. So on the whole, the game has very little content for gamers who are interested in the core RS experience established in games like Raven Shield and Rogue Spear. Rainbow Six has always had multiplayer pvp, but the heart of the series has always been tactical cooperative mission planning and execution.

    The gameplay itself is great. There are many large and well-designed maps. The graphics and animations are terrific. The shooting mechanics are fine, and the characters you can unlock have a lot of neat tricks they can do, from breaching charges to emp grenades. Using the destructible environments to create new sight lines or entrances is great fun. The drone is cool and very useful. The downside of the situation missions and terrorist hunts is they sometimes take the "waves of enemies" approach that is more CoD than tactical shooter. And the inclusion of suicide bombers in every mission that are more Jason Vorhees than a human enemy is kind of ridiculous. Still, the action is a lot of fun.

    Another negative for me is the whole cash-grab aspect of this game, with a rewards system that encourages multiplayer players to spend even more money on top of this game's already steep price tag of sixty bucks to get important upgrades quicker. And charging money for things like weapon skins that should have been opened up to the modding community like other games (e.g., Skyrim) do.

    Siege is a good game for what it is, but for me it's not a fully Rainbow Six game, it's more a game for the CoD crowd, just like the new Tomb Raiders are not fully Tomb Raider games, but are more for the Uncharted crowd. Without any real support for single player or co-op, the game ultimately lacks staying power since playing options will diminish as the online community shrinks over time. I expect Siege will end up on a dusty shelf or uninstalled on Steam for most players by the end of the year.    … Expand
  85. Gohenko
    Apr 2, 2016
    8
    One of the most tactical shooters released in recent years, Rainbow Six Siege feels like a breath of fresh air compared to the increasingly stale mainstream fps franchises like Call of Duty and Battlefield. However, you have to play it through Uplay and Ubisoft isn't exactly known for being great at supporting their games. Even now, months after launch, there are still some netcode issuesOne of the most tactical shooters released in recent years, Rainbow Six Siege feels like a breath of fresh air compared to the increasingly stale mainstream fps franchises like Call of Duty and Battlefield. However, you have to play it through Uplay and Ubisoft isn't exactly known for being great at supporting their games. Even now, months after launch, there are still some netcode issues and bugs tainting an otherwise great game.
    Also, if you're looking for great single player content, it's not here. Siege is a game that's best experienced online with friends, and playing it any other way will be a lesser experience. The full retail asking price might seem a bit high because of that, but the game's well worth picking up on sale if you're at all interested in a more thoughtful and complex online shooter.    … Expand
  86. Glitshy
    Mar 26, 2016
    4
    It just isn't worth it. It's not worth 60 bucks. It's not worth playing alone. And it's not worth the name Rainbow Six, as it doesn't have a campaign, which made the series what it is. Every Rainbow Six had one, but hey threw it out of the window as soon as Tom Clancy couldn't argue about it, and it even costs much less money for Ubisoft. Obviously no reason to make it cost less than 60It just isn't worth it. It's not worth 60 bucks. It's not worth playing alone. And it's not worth the name Rainbow Six, as it doesn't have a campaign, which made the series what it is. Every Rainbow Six had one, but hey threw it out of the window as soon as Tom Clancy couldn't argue about it, and it even costs much less money for Ubisoft. Obviously no reason to make it cost less than 60 bucks. And they even could use his name. $$$… Expand
  87. jgr94
    Mar 26, 2016
    7
    Don't let the reviews fool you (This is just the classic AAA title bashing).
    The gameplay is so f**king addicting. Best fun I have had in a FPS in a long time!
  88. Xari
    Mar 24, 2016
    2
    Atrocious networking, I run into all kinds of NAT and weird connection issues that I do not have in any other multiplayer games. What is up with never being able to join friends' squads but they can join mine anyway? Add on top the random crashes and I've just given up. What a waste of a potentially great game.
  89. eXcels
    Mar 21, 2016
    4
    The game itself trying to attempt a really good FPS online game. But it fails in a lot of points:
    - laggy server
    - bugs ( like drone is falling through the ground, not gaining points for victory or loss ) are just normal (after the third month of release date!) - the enemy can see you but you can't see the enemy. I was killed several times by invisible hostile players. The kill-cam    The game itself trying to attempt a really good FPS online game. But it fails in a lot of points:
    - laggy server
    - bugs ( like drone is falling through the ground, not gaining points for victory or loss ) are just normal (after the third month of release date!)
    - the enemy can see you but you can't see the enemy. I was killed several times by invisible hostile
    players. The kill-cam shows me that the enemy allegedly was standing in front of me.
    -

    It isn't worth 60$ not even the half    … Expand
  90. MagicElemental
    Mar 18, 2016
    9
    Siege is a slower paced thoughtful shooter. I was glad to get a fps that was less likely to be dominated by twitch kids who don't have a job and can play all day. Decent amount of variety with class structure.

    There are still connection issues. The friends list works through a 3rd party system (that isn't Steam) so you have to go to a different screen to see if you have invites.    Siege is a slower paced thoughtful shooter. I was glad to get a fps that was less likely to be dominated by twitch kids who don't have a job and can play all day. Decent amount of variety with class structure.

    There are still connection issues. The friends list works through a 3rd party system (that isn't Steam) so you have to go to a different screen to see if you have invites. Everyone once in a while you will run into a team that can work around the slower paced mechanics and turn it into a game of twitch CoD. For example defenders that will rush the attackers.    … Expand
  91. crypticturtle
    Mar 8, 2016
    7
    A fun tactical game with an excellent attack-defense system. While some are not useful, each class has a unique play style, most notably being the difference between offense and defensive classes. I would score this game higher, however it is not worth the 50-60 dollar price tag. This being a multiplayer-only game (aside from some tutorial missions) along the likes of CSGO, I believe it isA fun tactical game with an excellent attack-defense system. While some are not useful, each class has a unique play style, most notably being the difference between offense and defensive classes. I would score this game higher, however it is not worth the 50-60 dollar price tag. This being a multiplayer-only game (aside from some tutorial missions) along the likes of CSGO, I believe it is worth the 20-30 US dollar range.… Expand
  92. mevsthevoices
    Feb 29, 2016
    5
    Improves on nothing over previous installments, fails as a shooter. The idea that this has anything to do with tactics is pretty laughable. Give me back Rainbow Six Vegas 1/2 anyday, much more solid games
  93. Fuze228
    Feb 28, 2016
    10
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Just 10/10!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!… Expand
  94. FURY_Heisenberg
    Feb 21, 2016
    10
    A must try for every shooter fan.
    To all the negative reviews, I bet you guys haven't given this game a god amount of time.
    THIS IS ONE OF A KIND EXPERIENCE!!

    Yes the servers are a bit buggy, but ubisoft is doing all they can IMO.

    COMPLETELY WORTH 60$
  95. xKindred
    Feb 19, 2016
    7
    An entertaining & tactical shooter prioritizing the players freedom of choice, without the anxious complexity of more competitive FPS titles. Siege manages to cram as much variety as possible without becoming overwhelming to players new to this style of game. The lack of PC exclusive features leave much to desire due to its underwhelming lack of dedicated servers & small differences to theAn entertaining & tactical shooter prioritizing the players freedom of choice, without the anxious complexity of more competitive FPS titles. Siege manages to cram as much variety as possible without becoming overwhelming to players new to this style of game. The lack of PC exclusive features leave much to desire due to its underwhelming lack of dedicated servers & small differences to the console version. Given its triple-A release price and prestigious series history, Siege has a lot to live up to, but its inevitable repetition leaves more to be desired. Nevertheless, Siege is a laugh to play with friends & unlocking the many operators & accessories feels progressive as well as rewarding.… Expand
  96. Th3Badwolf
    Feb 18, 2016
    0
    Filled with bugs, nonsense and error. Gameplay is very nice WHEN it works.
    It is beyond comprehension that having 32gb of ram and 2 R9 290X still get me some hard lag. Way to go ubi.
  97. FeartheBear
    Feb 16, 2016
    0
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Con-
    When this game came out it played like a beta. -1pts

    To report an actual cheater/glitcher It will literally take you 5-10 minutes. and then its unlikely anything will happen unless you filmed it. -2pts

    When you **** up the match for you team by killing the hostage there is no consequence. This doesn't sound to bad until you realize how often it actually happens. -1pts

    The matchmaking system is horrible for ranked play. The system they use searches for players your level to join with so its an even match, this only works if theirs plenty of people playing, unfortunately you'll be lvl 30 and joined with three other lvl 30s and maybe a 60, and the other team is full of 60+ lvl players that are max ranked lvl because the system joins them together on the same team first. This makes winning any ranked game Very difficult as it Literally stacks the best players against you most of the time. -2pts.

    There is a horrible random crash that will crash the game during a game. At any moment usually within the first round. this can happen as often as 3 out of every 4 games or maybe not at all. It all depends. -1pts

    UPLAY has to be used which is horrible, just horrible for PC players at least. -2pts

    It can take up to 2-3 mins just to join a game. That added in with the fact that it might crash for no reason means it could and has taken me 10+ mins to join an actual game. Which just sucks -2pts

    No hardcore mode for a game that lacks the need for a more realistic mode, this usually wouldn't be a problem, but this is a Rainbow is game, a game Known for its realistic modes, not the **** shot several times and still running around stuff. -3pts

    = -14

    Pro-

    Great take on a played out idea for a game +1pts

    Full Price game but all DLCs are free after initial week +2pts

    Characters are decently balanced + 1pts

    Cheaters perma banned +1pts

    The Game visually looks Great +1pts

    The game does have destructibility +1pts

    Nearly every game plays different +1pts

    = +8

    Total - 6

    I really do like the Idea of this game, it could be Amazing, But several months and a major update in and its NOT worth it. **** this ****    … Expand
  98. Indrigis
    Feb 14, 2016
    7
    My biggest problem with R6S is the amount of pointless restrictions and omissions in the game.

    Defenders can block doors and use remote explosives but don't get shields, flashbangs or decent DMRs; attackers are not allowed to use the heartbeat sensor or block the doorways behind them. There are no destructible light sources or thermal scopes. Even though there are cameras in the game,    My biggest problem with R6S is the amount of pointless restrictions and omissions in the game.

    Defenders can block doors and use remote explosives but don't get shields, flashbangs or decent DMRs; attackers are not allowed to use the heartbeat sensor or block the doorways behind them. There are no destructible light sources or thermal scopes. Even though there are cameras in the game, motion detection alarms are not an option. It's as if Ubisoft were trying to make Counter-Strike with mutually exclusive classes instead of a proper next gen squad tactical game with customizable loadouts.

    While the maps are decent, they also have an element of luck to them, with some positions being easy to defend and some downright atrocious for any mode, and the position itself being random and not changeable (can't move the hostage/container/bombs). Getting the short end of the stick is never fun.

    And mechanically it's not very fun either. Instead of deployables being placeable via their projected model like in many other games, R6S forces the operator to shuffle back and forth until they magically raise their hands into the 'can deploy' position. It's not realistic, it's deliberately crippled control. Of course, barbed wire, bear traps and whatnot can not be placed on stairs, no, sir. Only on flat surfaces with at least a meter of free space behind them (for the operative to stand when deploying). All the traps, even the mechanical ones, have IFF, e.g. the barbed wire doesn't slow down allies. MAGIC!

    When the game works, it feels good. Yet, most of the time it just feels like "Game1 and Game2 did this so much better" and makes me wish for far more freedom in choosing loadouts and doing things.    … Expand
  99. shukero
    Feb 9, 2016
    10
    This game is CRIMINALLY UNDER-RATED!

    I'm not one to write reviews, but all of the bot / spammer reviews that give this game a 0 or a 1 made me so mad I had to set the record straight. 1) The BIGGEST complaint I've seen is that there is no single player. SO WHAT? You do realize that single player in FPS's haven't been good since Half-Life 2 right? As a matter of fact, everyone has    This game is CRIMINALLY UNDER-RATED!

    I'm not one to write reviews, but all of the bot / spammer reviews that give this game a 0 or a 1 made me so mad I had to set the record straight.

    1) The BIGGEST complaint I've seen is that there is no single player. SO WHAT? You do realize that single player in FPS's haven't been good since Half-Life 2 right? As a matter of fact, everyone has been **** about the Single player in games like battlefield and Call of Duty ever since Modern Warefare 1. That, plus the fact that only people that like RPG's or Turn Based Strat. games play single player anymore. The main reason why SP isn't included is due to the fact that AI is so difficult to control with all of the physics in this game, it would take the dev team around 5 years just to get the AI to a point where it's passable... not good... just passable. Also they said it was going to be Multiplayer ONLY before the release... So why are you ranking this game badly? Because you are illiterate?

    2) STOP COMPARING THIS TO CALL OF DUTY AND BATTLEFIELD! This just goes to show that these bot / spammer reviews are full of crap; and that none of these reviews come from people that actually played the game. The ONLY game that can SOME WHAT be compared to RS: Siege would be the Counter-Strike Series. THAT BEING SAID; the only ways these two games are similar are as follows. A) You have two teams, super basic for an FPS. B) IF you get killed you have to wait until the current round is done in order to respawn. C) Counter-Strike like RS: Siege is an FPS that's only Online play. D) Counter-Strike does involve some strategy, but not NEARLY as much as RS: Siege. This is because there are no "Improvised" routes you can take to your objective. THAT IS ALL. The damage, gun, recoil, and sight systems used in Counter-Strike are VASTLY different than in RS: Siege. AND I LOVE THAT FACT! No longer do I have to shoot someone 20 times in the chest with a rifle in order to kill them.

    2a) The reason why I said not to compare this game with Call of Duty or Battlefield is because both CoD and Battlefield have yet AGAIN vastly different gameplay than RS: Siege. Let's take CoD first shall we? A) CoD is basically a run and gun game. IE you run you kill / get killed and then almost instantly respawn. This is WAAAAY different that RS: Siege; which is a strategy shooter. Your life has a lot more meaning and weight in RS: Siege than I've seen in almost any other game. (More on that later) Next lets talk about the CoD damage system... WHICH IS ATROCIOUS! empty a 30 round clip into someone and they still live? That's utter crap! That and you can get useless / un-strategic perks to help with your health, drop a grenade after you die, get a second chance, run faster etc.These are useless in a team dynamic and are basically there for the individual. If it doesn't help the team it's basically a gimmick to add some "oooooOoOOOOoOoo" factor. (This doesn't work on me) RS: Siege doesn't need OR have these gimmicks. Now with all of this being said, of course there is a hardcore mode in CoD, but that still requires 3-4 shots, and you still have those crappy gimmicks.

    2b) Now lets talk about Battlefield. In Normal Mode, battlefield just basically just like CoD, but with extra physics, better graphics, vehicles, more "Strategic" perks (Gimmicks). and lastly a much better damage / bullet arc system. Like I said above, about 99% of this doesn't apply to RS: Siege, with the exception of the "Strategic" perks. (IE riot shields, barbed wire, etc.) Lastly the ONLY thing you can compare RS: Siege to battlefield with, would be Battlefields "Hardcore" mode. In this mode, the damage system is somewhat similar although not exactly the same and you still have those "Strategic" perks that help your teammates. Other than that, Battlefield is vastly different. Just the map sizes alone shows this. (Depending on your game mode of course - but basically all game modes work off of the same 10-12 HUGE maps... It's just that Battlefield restricts the range of these maps drastically)

    3) After playing this game for a while, I've come to see that no other FPS is as strategic as RS: Siege. Sure some come close, like insurgency; but if you wanna talk about bad AI.., MAN! the AI in that game has basically 2 modes: Aimbot, and wallhacks. The fact that you can improvise in RS: Siege is one of it's best features, and the fact that the dev team made an actual "Destructive Enviornment" (I'm looking at you BF!) is just AMAZING. The gameplay is intense, very strategic and very thought provoking. People that just want to run and gun shouldn't even be looking at any "Tom Clancy" game, let alone this one.

    The last thing I want to say about the game, is about the dev support... IT'S F***ING GOOOOOOD. They fix bugs much faster than I've ever seen on any FPS. (This includes CoD and Battlefield) The dev's also did a great job with making this game run smoothly at 60 FPS. That's It! Later!    … Expand
  100. Radioactivebuny
    Feb 7, 2016
    4
    Something about the way the game handles from a technical standpoint makes playing it almost physically painful. That, of course, pales in comparison to the emotional pain of knowing that I'll never get an experience like the original Rainbow Six games, or even the Vegas games back. The fact that Ghost Recon appears to be next after Future Soldier only makes this feeling worse.

    It    Something about the way the game handles from a technical standpoint makes playing it almost physically painful. That, of course, pales in comparison to the emotional pain of knowing that I'll never get an experience like the original Rainbow Six games, or even the Vegas games back. The fact that Ghost Recon appears to be next after Future Soldier only makes this feeling worse.

    It makes me sad to play it, and though I got it for $40, I regret every last penny of that purchase and wish I'd bought Squad instead.    … Expand
Page:

Awards & Rankings

82
#82 Best PC Game of 2015
6
#6 Most Discussed PC Game of 2015
16
#16 Most Shared PC Game of 2015

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
79

Generally favorable reviews - based on 37 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 29 out of 37
  2. Mixed: 8 out of 37
  3. Negative: 0 out of 37
  1. Pelit (Finland)
    Mar 3, 2016
    86
    An excellent and innovative breath of fresh air. The more I play, the more I like. I hope this is new role model for shooters to come. [Jan 2016]
  2. CD-Action
    Feb 4, 2016
    70
    Siege’s multiplayer mode with its hectic pace and unpredictability seems to have a huge e-sport potential but with random teammates is often unplayable. [01/2016, p.52]
  3. Game World Navigator Magazine
    Jan 20, 2016
    80
    Unfortunately, there aren’t that many maps available, but each one of them has lots of details and alternate routes, like basements and balconies. Even the airplane is much more complex than the archetypical “long tube with seats.” [Issue#205, p.48]
See all critic reviews »