Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon: Breakpoint

 PC
User Score
3.0

Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 940 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 185 out of 940
  2. Mixed: 92 out of 940
  3. Negative: 663 out of 940

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. lenol03
    Oct 7, 2019
    0
    - Clunky, clumsily harmonised controls that scream bad port
    - Unintuitive menus
    - Sloppy, busy-work navigation - Over-complicated, over-intrusive inventory management - Horribly designed UI with badly translated text - Infuriating, needlessly complicated interactions with NPCs - Flawed, inconsistent cover implementation - Weak, non-tactical movement - Weak, non-tactical combat -    - Clunky, clumsily harmonised controls that scream bad port
    - Unintuitive menus
    - Sloppy, busy-work navigation
    - Over-complicated, over-intrusive inventory management
    - Horribly designed UI with badly translated text
    - Infuriating, needlessly complicated interactions with NPCs
    - Flawed, inconsistent cover implementation
    - Weak, non-tactical movement
    - Weak, non-tactical combat
    - Brain-dead AI
    - Hack storytelling and voice-acting, constant immersion-breaking
    - Feeble sound
    -Micro Transactions up the ass

    Wow. And none of this is to do with the Beta state of the thing; it's just fifth-rate game design and a horribly compromised basic concept. There is nothing here for the singleplayer gamer at all and it's pretty easy to tell that multiplayer will be generic and vanilla. All the tedious homework building inventory and attempting to power-up your character is so intrusive and distracting from any kind of realistic core tactical combat that it makes Division 2 look like the best tac-shooter on the market. The imminent Call of Duty game could be the worst in the series and it will still be ten times as good as this lamentable, doomed mess of a game. It's really, really horrible. Wildlands was much better and that was a cartoon. I need to play a little Control now, just to remind myself what a well-designed game is.    … Expand
  2. Richard129
    Oct 7, 2019
    0
    Always the same bugs every games. The games is clearly not finish. Wait 6 much before buying it.
  3. ItGeraltOfRivia
    Oct 7, 2019
    1
    В целом мне нравятся игры от юбисофт и в основном я закрываю глаза на некоторые изьяны в их играх из-за того что и у других они есть, но сколько можно ложить болт на сюжет и наполнения открытого мира интересными побочками, раз берётесь делать открытий мир будьте столь любезны заполнить его не однотипными побочками а чем нибудь интересным, да и что за убогая система уровней (некоторым онаВ целом мне нравятся игры от юбисофт и в основном я закрываю глаза на некоторые изьяны в их играх из-за того что и у других они есть, но сколько можно ложить болт на сюжет и наполнения открытого мира интересными побочками, раз берётесь делать открытий мир будьте столь любезны заполнить его не однотипными побочками а чем нибудь интересным, да и что за убогая система уровней (некоторым она нравится) да и в целом и меня не особо беспокоит, но far cry new dawn, rage 2, Wolfenstein: Youngblood не показали то что в основном людям она не заходит? лично я бы не хотел видеть новые игры с нею. Насчет доната особо претензий у меня нету т.к пока не заставляют донатить оно мне и не интересно ,но раз видно что людям не нравятся этим тайсейверы то почему бы не делать только скины? или вы так сильно много на них зарабатываете что готовы терпеть тонны хейта в свой адресс?.. Насчет оптимизации, лагов и багов,, да сейчас много игра с лагами да багами выходить, но это не значить что у такой большой компании так же должны такие выходить, в целом лично мне игра норм после збт была думал брать, но на бетке 30-80 фпс это очень плохо. Имею в колекции большую часть игр и чуть ли не все новинки с 2015 года но, в этот раз все плохо) Я люблю открытие мири, но куда интереснее было бы в них играть когда там и сюжет интересный а не халтура для галочки. Надеюсь юбики изменятся рано или поздно, ну или как минимум я знаю что хоть что-то сделал, по сравнению с теми кто под новостними постами и роликами на ютубе орет как все плохо и ничего не делая при этом.… Expand
  4. rogueshark3333
    Oct 7, 2019
    10
    I have played most of the triple A games ever made, and this one is the most enjoyable of all of them. The graphics and art style are excellent and realistic. The sound effects are superb for the guns, vehicles, and drone enemies. The game is not too hard that it frustrates me while not being easy in any way. The game is enjoyable whether you decide to play stealthily or loud, which is anI have played most of the triple A games ever made, and this one is the most enjoyable of all of them. The graphics and art style are excellent and realistic. The sound effects are superb for the guns, vehicles, and drone enemies. The game is not too hard that it frustrates me while not being easy in any way. The game is enjoyable whether you decide to play stealthily or loud, which is an improvement over Wildlands, a game that seemed to force you to go in quietly or get killed instantly. There is added complexity to keep the game interesting, such as upgradable weapons, but the complexity is not forced on players and you can still enjoy the game without making use of any gun upgrades. The game is not in any way boring because there are a variety of environment types (snow, jungle, industrial) to keep the game interesting, and each enemy base has a distinct design (the developers did not copy and paste base design). The game does not force players to spend a very long time upgrading your character (It can be done very quickly), so you will not have to wait until the end of the game to have a fully leveled up character. You can play solo without the game feeling too difficult (The difficulty of enemies becomes higher as you add more coop teammates). My only criticism is that the civilians say a lot of stupid and obnoxious things when you walk past them. I doubt they would talk so rudely to a soldier killing everyone in sight (They would certainly feel intimidated and keep their mouths shut for the most part). I expect the game to be enjoyable to fans of tactical shooters that involve more than just mindless shooting and people who enjoy strategizing during combat. I didn't agree with the negative reviews from critics and I highly recommend this game. I feel as if the critics are only interested in nitpicking about minor things that they dislike about the game and don't appreciate the fun factor of this game. The important thing is that the game is a lot of fun and it certainly delivers in that regard.… Expand
  5. Rayden666
    Oct 7, 2019
    10
    No, it's not worth a 10. But considering you have a bunch of retards giving a 0, without them even owning the game, it needs to be compensated.

    I'd say 8/10. The gameworld is great, story is prettty interesting, gunplay feels good, character customisation is pretty decent. Anyone who likes open world tactical shooters, should take a look at this game. The gunsmith is a step back    No, it's not worth a 10. But considering you have a bunch of retards giving a 0, without them even owning the game, it needs to be compensated.

    I'd say 8/10.

    The gameworld is great, story is prettty interesting, gunplay feels good, character customisation is pretty decent. Anyone who likes open world tactical shooters, should take a look at this game.

    The gunsmith is a step back from Wildlands, which already was a step back from Future Soldier.

    As for the whole mtx **** every single weapon and attachement can be found ingame, for free. There is no pay to win what so ever. The only thing limited to the store are a handfull of cosmetics.    … Expand
  6. KenixKill96
    Oct 7, 2019
    0
    An absolut trash of a game. Do not buy this games unless you just want to waste money!
  7. Orange12
    Oct 7, 2019
    0
    One step forwards a million backwards. When ubisoft is making fantastic games like Assassins creed youd expect them to be able to do something as simple as writing an interesting story and gameplay that isnt extremely bland and repetitive
  8. Razrback16
    Oct 7, 2019
    0
    Wow, the monetization...never thought I'd see the day Ubisoft turned into basically another EA but that's where we're at. Ubisoft hasn't produced a truly fantastic game in about 5-6 years now and seem to going further down the toilet with a game like this. Ubisoft has basically sold their souls at this point - they are not interested in producing good games, they are interested in baitingWow, the monetization...never thought I'd see the day Ubisoft turned into basically another EA but that's where we're at. Ubisoft hasn't produced a truly fantastic game in about 5-6 years now and seem to going further down the toilet with a game like this. Ubisoft has basically sold their souls at this point - they are not interested in producing good games, they are interested in baiting people into micro transactions. This game isn't really a game - it's an always-online storefront. Do NOT purchase this game. I'm warning you now - if you go ahead and buy it, blame yourself later when you regret it because you've been warned.… Expand
  9. J-Lead
    Oct 7, 2019
    0
    I am not exaggerating when I say that it's not only garbage, it's garbage by design. This game is designed around the idea of full spectrum profitability; charging the $60 for the game itself and following that up with mobile-style f2p/ptw mechanics.

    Putting aside that the game is lousy with bugs to the point of near-unplayability (for now, we'll get to that part later), Everything,    I am not exaggerating when I say that it's not only garbage, it's garbage by design. This game is designed around the idea of full spectrum profitability; charging the $60 for the game itself and following that up with mobile-style f2p/ptw mechanics.

    Putting aside that the game is lousy with bugs to the point of near-unplayability (for now, we'll get to that part later), Everything, (literally EVERYTHING!) is built around the prospect of incentivizing you to visit the in-game store. For example; there's an in-game progression cap that refreshes every day that stops you from unlocking everything at your own pace in order to nudge you towards the store to simply buy it. Yes, you read that right; there are free-to-play progression mechanics in a $60 game, and the always-online requirement has nothing to do with character progression as Ubisoft claims so much as it's meant to accommodate this (after all; you can't implement mobile-style f2p/ptw mechanics in a game you can play offline.) What's more, the Gunsmith options (such as barrel length, stocks, triggers, scopes, and foregrips) have been neutered wholesale to instead accommodate different weapon "variants" that fill in the role of the weapon you would otherwise have the freedom to create yourself in Wildlands or Future Soldier, and these variants are not only subject to the aformentioned progression system, but are limited in terms of attachment options to force them into a particular combat role, all in order to push you to buy/unlock the other variants in that weapon tree.

    To add to this, the game is in worse shape than it was in the beta. The game has weird problems loading assets in a timely manner that borders on comical, at times; I can't count the number of instances. I completed an objective by airdropping in, doing what I needed to do, and getting out before the game could load the enemies that are supposed to be in my way. Alternatively, there's also been occasions where mission completion was hampered not by the enemies themselves, but instead the fact that the game quite literally FORGOT TO LOAD THE MISSION'S TARGET OBJECTIVE, at which point I turned on guided mode to realize the game was only showing me an objective marker in an empty space where the objective was supposed to be. I am not making this up, and this has happened at least twice a play session.

    The framework of an exceedingly average, but functional military shooter with some nice co-op potential is there, but the vision, coherence, and logical in-game progression is absent in favor of a business model, and unless they rework the entirety of this game's business model from the ground up, it absolutely deserves to fail.    … Expand
  10. Kayu
    Oct 7, 2019
    0
    This had to be the worst game I've played all year, Hard crashing (check), Several failed log-in's (check), a store front filled with the brim with items a mobile game would have and a session pass to boot (Check) I honestly tryed enjoying my self with this game but sadly it's broken and unfinished. I feel like this game is a social experiment to test my sanity.
  11. chrisbard
    Oct 7, 2019
    0
    The worst unfinished greedy microtransaction adjusted game that ubi EA games has ever done! It's broken!
  12. AARON3378
    Oct 7, 2019
    0
    The people rating this games are the ones that dont own it or have played it. Micro transaction are not necessary in the game. I have put a little over 20 hours in the game and have not felt compelled to buy anything. The microtransaction are minimal compared to wildlands. As for the gameplay the game is great. Good open world that lets you figure where to go next. The looting system isThe people rating this games are the ones that dont own it or have played it. Micro transaction are not necessary in the game. I have put a little over 20 hours in the game and have not felt compelled to buy anything. The microtransaction are minimal compared to wildlands. As for the gameplay the game is great. Good open world that lets you figure where to go next. The looting system is different then what i thought. The base weapons damage is the same know matter what level m4(gs10) is the same as m4(95) the only thing that changes is the stats like handling or reload speed whatever the stat might be. Overall the game is great and dont let the micro transaction scare you there not as big as everyone makes them seem.… Expand
  13. Raffomatiko
    Oct 7, 2019
    0
    It's so bad. The loot options are **** It makes non sense. I really don't recommend to buy this game!!!
  14. Galdeos
    Oct 7, 2019
    0
    More microtransaction than p2w mobile game..
    When you release a AAA game for that price, and spend time with teams to create those outrageous microtransaction when the games is filled with insane bugs that even a Bethesda game doesnt have anymore...
    I find it a bit insulting to sell full price a game that broken woth those bugs but with a fully operational store selling anything from xp to    More microtransaction than p2w mobile game..
    When you release a AAA game for that price, and spend time with teams to create those outrageous microtransaction when the games is filled with insane bugs that even a Bethesda game doesnt have anymore...
    I find it a bit insulting to sell full price a game that broken woth those bugs but with a fully operational store selling anything from xp to gloves..    … Expand
  15. Mr_Palmers
    Oct 7, 2019
    0
    This game is gonna get so old so quick, Ubisoft has the tools to create memorable games that would age very well, instead they create these corporate projects to hit the targets each quarter and the sheep will buy them, they timed the release of this very well after a long dry period for AAA games in August and September, get kids hooked with all the colorful customization to play forThis game is gonna get so old so quick, Ubisoft has the tools to create memorable games that would age very well, instead they create these corporate projects to hit the targets each quarter and the sheep will buy them, they timed the release of this very well after a long dry period for AAA games in August and September, get kids hooked with all the colorful customization to play for about 6-12 months, then it will be forgotten servers switched off, release the next one, repeat.

    Pros: headshots, sneaking around, mud/snow effects on clothes, sound effects, graphics are nice too
    Cons: driving/flying is absolutely jokes, story line is dull, no destructible elements, microtransactions, loot system makes no sense, RPG perks are so bad, survival elements are pointless

    Ubisoft were listening to the wrong type of feedback regarding Wildlands    … Expand
  16. IsAl
    Oct 7, 2019
    8
    Bugs, lags and microtransactions...
    Raw unfinished product...
    Fire Pixel is terrible...
  17. Azanhof
    Oct 7, 2019
    0
    Du neuf avec du vieux rien n'est surprenant rien n'est transcendant rien d'original du vu et revu du joué et rejoué surtout pour les gens qui on un peu D'UBISOFT dans les bras a l'heure de la next gen sortir un jeux au mécanisme de la PS3 début PS4 c'est tous simplement honteux
  18. SpleenSplitta
    Oct 7, 2019
    0
    Buggy game, Pay 2 win in a full priced game. When will AAA publishets learn and listen to the consumers. What are we paying for then with a full priced game???????
  19. J1NX
    Oct 7, 2019
    1
    The game have it's pros and cons but honestly nor of the pros counters the none-illusive over mass of cons. The only thing that been noticed as 'alright' was performance on even lower than avegrage machines but that's probably result of a poor graphics and empty open world. The solo players would find themselves lonely and bored and coop gives little help to change that. The game can'tThe game have it's pros and cons but honestly nor of the pros counters the none-illusive over mass of cons. The only thing that been noticed as 'alright' was performance on even lower than avegrage machines but that's probably result of a poor graphics and empty open world. The solo players would find themselves lonely and bored and coop gives little help to change that. The game can't escape the comparison with the previous title Wildlands and it loses on all fronts - the story is dull, the world is dead, even the music is far behind the back. All in all - the very expected failure in Ubisoft's attept to milk the successful title as soon as possible, full of wrong decisions and bad design. 1 out of 10 for trying, actually it's 0 of out 10 - not worth the disk space it takes.… Expand
  20. Gn2056
    Oct 6, 2019
    0
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. this game is trash. Take it to the bridge, throw it overboard see if it can swim back to the shore. You have no reason to buy this game that will hold up in 4 hours. Pass on it.… Expand
  21. bartcbem
    Oct 6, 2019
    0
    Ubisoft went full EA on its fans with this TC title that is in all honesty a massive downgrade from very enjoyable Wildlands. Game is far from polished, full of bugs, doesnt feel like Tom Clance game at all with added silly RPG mechanics. Driving and flying feels awful, the story is poor, I could keep going like that for a full page.
    Not only that but you pay full AAA entry price for what    Ubisoft went full EA on its fans with this TC title that is in all honesty a massive downgrade from very enjoyable Wildlands. Game is far from polished, full of bugs, doesnt feel like Tom Clance game at all with added silly RPG mechanics. Driving and flying feels awful, the story is poor, I could keep going like that for a full page.
    Not only that but you pay full AAA entry price for what it seems like a mobile monetization scheme.
    And recent attempt from Ubisoft to back out from it was insulting to anyone intelligence.
    I know its like fight with windmills but dont buy this game, dont support companies like EA, Ubisoft, Bethesda and 2k untill they get their **** together.
    Sad to see gaming going down the drain like this.    … Expand
  22. AlexHasOpinions
    Oct 6, 2019
    0
    I’ve never reviewed anything on metacritic before, but this game is so bad that I had to say something. Absolute garbage, throwing your money down the toilet would be more fun.
  23. Boxies
    Oct 6, 2019
    3
    This is a bad game. Buggy, unfinished, terrible story, bad cut scenes, bad animations....Forget the MTX, it stands alone as a bad product. Add in the MTX and you have a complete stinker on your hands. Avoid at all costs, save your time, and save your money.
  24. DNGERS55555
    Oct 6, 2019
    10
    It's a lot of fun on the extreme difficulty. my buddy and I always try to turn off all quiet so that no one gets it and have spent so already 20 hours with the game
  25. ably96
    Oct 6, 2019
    0
    more poor cosmetic items, more bugs, more microtransactions.
    had amazing environment and advanced enemy detection, more density open world but everything else is so bad and poor that makes the game even worse then Anthem.
  26. Kurt74
    Oct 6, 2019
    4
    Poor game and performance. Wildlands 2. Ctrl C + Ctrl V. Ubisoft made a copy of the another game. This is a shame.
  27. kato_nash
    Oct 6, 2019
    7
    I don't really understand the hate in the user reviews section about microtransactions. There are only approximately 5 or so "character outfits" that you can ONLY buy with ghost coins. 98% of the skins and camo you can buy with the lootable in-game currency. Microtransactions are a time-saver ONLY.

    With that being said - This game is like taking GR: Wildlands, the good stuff from The    I don't really understand the hate in the user reviews section about microtransactions. There are only approximately 5 or so "character outfits" that you can ONLY buy with ghost coins. 98% of the skins and camo you can buy with the lootable in-game currency. Microtransactions are a time-saver ONLY.

    With that being said - This game is like taking GR: Wildlands, the good stuff from The Division 2, and then merging the two games together. There are new Item Level mechanics, crafting systems, map, characters, guns. There are a lot of assets that were re-used from Wildlands in the form of gun models, textures, sounds, etc. but this doesn't bother me a ton because I thought they weren't in need of a massive re-do in this department anyway.

    The single biggest complaint with this game, and seems to be a recurring theme for Ubisoft developed titles, is that the menu navigation and design is G A R B A G E. Navigating through the mission objectives page, inventory menus, gunsmith, and just the menu in general is designed poorly. Too many keybinds change depending on what menu you're in, and just overall the clarity of the menus is awful. I'm not going to hold it against this game specifically too much though, because it seems to be a recurring theme with Ubisoft titles.

    IMO - If you enjoyed Wildlands, you will enjoy Breakpoint. If you didn't enjoy Wildlands, you aren't going to enjoy Breakpoint.    … Expand
  28. el_pingo_loco
    Oct 6, 2019
    0
    Please don't make the same mistake I did, I played the beta and thought boy! there are some mistakes but it's a beta so probably they are gonna improve a lot...But nope, it' s the same. Same horrible AI, same boring missions over and over and bugs (a lot). I am so regretful, I bought the cheapest version but still, I fell like they rip me off... F U ubisoft.. F U
  29. Exxes
    Oct 6, 2019
    9
    Amazing game, The main quests lines are scenarised. You feel way more into the character than wildland. The game need optimization of course, this is the first week. Pvp is great and strategic, in the main lobby you will find plenty of players to coop with pretty much like destiny. Enemy is a threat and game is less redundant than wildland but similar
  30. Speed
    Oct 6, 2019
    0
    Full of microtransactions, Pay2win, lots and lots of bugs and soon to expect game infected with cheaters like all Ubisoft games.

    No thanks, I'll pass!
  31. RustyCoin
    Oct 6, 2019
    0
    This is what we get nowadays from Ubisoft (and mostly from any AAA publishers), an incomplete games with sh*tloads of bugs, crashes and grinding. This game is not an exception too.

    So Ubisoft proudly presents us their new game - Ghost Recon: The Division (microtransactions edition). It's an online virtual casino/ clothing/ armor/ weapon shop that no rational, actually thinking gamer    This is what we get nowadays from Ubisoft (and mostly from any AAA publishers), an incomplete games with sh*tloads of bugs, crashes and grinding. This game is not an exception too.

    So Ubisoft proudly presents us their new game - Ghost Recon: The Division (microtransactions edition). It's an online virtual casino/ clothing/ armor/ weapon shop that no rational, actually thinking gamer ever wanted. You can literally get almot any virtual thing that is in game, even worse - it's pay to win, which means any weapon you buy for real world money to play in singleplayer, you can also use same weapon in PvP, so it's total pay to win. Of course you can also get most of stuff by playing the game, which is sh*t - grinding repetitive quests, daily missions, gathering resources, all the boring and monotonous stuff over and over again for hours. Basically, you have to "live" in this game to actually get items in it, you have to have no real life. Or of course you can buy some in-game credits for a real money, spend an extra let's say 300-500 euros/dollars and get some items, boosters etc in matter of seconds.

    So fellow gamers - be sure to put half of your hard worked monthly income into this f**king virtual shop, buy some boosters and some "time savers", support such piece of s**t companies like Ubisoft, to get even more incomplete products in the future.

    Full price 60/100/120 euros game, and they adding those f**king microtransactions plus making it pay to win.... Jesus...

    Everything, really everything that Ubisoft lays their hands on turns into goddamn garbage. And there's no going back Ubisoft, you f**ked up.    … Expand
  32. Mikki1986
    Oct 6, 2019
    2
    Was thinking about giving the game solid 6 but Ubisoft need to buy my "ultimate season one pass review edition" until then barly 2.
  33. GhostRycon
    Oct 6, 2019
    10
    The map is huge, the graphics are awesome, the story is kind of good. It's Division on an island.

    To those who are giving a 0, you should close your Metacritic account. My score should be a 7.5 but, to balance those stupid rate, i gave it a 10
  34. Naduks
    Oct 6, 2019
    1
    I don't like this pay politiocon ............................ . ...........
  35. Shirokuro
    Oct 6, 2019
    5
    Alright hear me out before you mindlessly rate this review 'unhelpful'.

    I hate microtransactions as much as the next guy but the game doesn't shove them in your face at all. At least at the time I'm writing this review, the 'time savers' are gone and the progressing doesn't feel slow in my opinion. Most of the negative reviews I see here are full of nitpicking as well and rate the game    Alright hear me out before you mindlessly rate this review 'unhelpful'.

    I hate microtransactions as much as the next guy but the game doesn't shove them in your face at all. At least at the time I'm writing this review, the 'time savers' are gone and the progressing doesn't feel slow in my opinion. Most of the negative reviews I see here are full of nitpicking as well and rate the game 0 when there's a lot to like about it.

    Positives:
    + The open world is massive and beautiful with a lot of interesting places to explore.
    + The general gameplay is fun. So like in Ghost Recon Wildlands for example, roaming around the world in various ways, killing enemies in stealth or full assault.
    + Co-Op is great fun just like it was in Wildlands.
    + There's a huge amount of main and side missions to do.
    + A lot less cheap deaths than in Wildlands (e.g. dual uzis from 100m distance).
    + I personally like the whole injury system. Something about limping from cover to cover in combat is thrilling and fun.
    + I like the fact that there are different classes with their own special equipment and apparently there's gonna be more of them in the future.

    Mixed:
    ~ The mission pin system could use some work (you can pin up to three different missions but they'll cover like 1/3 of your screen and if you hide them with tab, you'll also hide the map).
    ~ The menus are pretty confusing at start but after some time you'll be going through them with ease.
    ~ Dismantling single items is pretty quick but it's a bit tedious to do it on a dozen of them (could possibly be fixed with a 'dismantle all' button or something).
    ~ You spend a lot of time changing your equipment but I guess you could just not do that whenever you get something new.
    ~ The A.I. squad you had in Wildlands is gone but I personally wouldn't care less.
    ~ Borrows a lot of things from other games but they're implemented just fine.

    Negatives:
    - The enemy A.I. is just dumb at times (e.g. running in circles or just standing still when their friend died next to them) and could be slightly harder.
    - The shop feels kinda pointless except for buying cosmetic stuff.
    - Some slightly annoying bugs related to changing your skin overlay and actual equipment.
    - Some visual bugs.
    - Some network related problems I guess but I haven't been affected by them so far.
    - The 'time savers' if they ever come back.

    TL:DR, the game might not be the most original piece out there but it certainly isn't terrible. If you liked Ghost Recon Wildlands, you'll probably enjoy Breakpoint as well.    … Expand
  36. Krispo123
    Oct 6, 2019
    0
    Stop with this microtransaction **** and release finished games. Stop with this microtransaction **** and release finished games.
  37. BadOssi
    Oct 6, 2019
    0
    Wildlands was the way mor better Game. Stupide unmotivated loot, stupid unmotivated design of random events (2 or 3 Persons with 2 or 3 motorcycles), unbelievable stupid KI even on extreme. Already lost all motivation to go on with the game. Also the coope which had been the best thing. So sad.
  38. Tabor31
    Oct 6, 2019
    5
    Even looking past all the microtransactions (which aren't a huge deal to me), the game feels rushed and lacking polish. I'm not sure of whether or not they're truly looking for an authentic and realistic experience, especially given the added RPG elements and gear score, though that's another thing I don't mind too much honestly given that every gun is pretty much a 1 shot kill to theEven looking past all the microtransactions (which aren't a huge deal to me), the game feels rushed and lacking polish. I'm not sure of whether or not they're truly looking for an authentic and realistic experience, especially given the added RPG elements and gear score, though that's another thing I don't mind too much honestly given that every gun is pretty much a 1 shot kill to the head, but weirdly it takes multiple shots if hitting center mass or shots to the thorax even with 5.56 and above caliber weapons.

    I really do enjoy realism, but, this game misses the mark entirely in a ton of aspects. The AI are terribly unaware even in the hardest difficulty, the "special operations soldier" you play as wears most of his gear like he's never actually worn any of it in a combat scenario (mags in pouches are facing the wrong direction, plate carriers are worn in a fashion that barely cover vitals, my M4A1 uses STANAG mags but I carry PMAGS, etc..) I could go on about that but I feel as though most people don't care about those things, or they're just unaware of it.

    I am enjoying most of the story but when I got to the part where I had to kill Walker I was extremely upset with how awfully set up the fight was. Abysmal even. The devs have completely raped Tom Clancy of anything he stood for. Not going to spoil how awful it was. But, **** realism.

    Anyways to keep my review more concise; the map is beautiful, the recycled features are a little better than Wildlands imo, if you don't want to give them more money don't buy anything, the 3rd person shooter bug kinda sucks balls, I hate this Division/GR baby they made, they should've remained separate games,

    I will admit that these baguettes did a 10/10 job at completely killing any and all reputation that the new Ghost Recon titles will ever have. You AAA developers and CEOs need to figure it the **** out or you're going to be running out of money in the near future.    … Expand
  39. LuluAndLeia
    Oct 6, 2019
    10
    This game gets way too much hate. you can play it completely without even looking at the micro transaction store. in my eyes it a nice military shooter to play with cool customization and so far a interesting story. the gameplay is really fun and in some ways realistic and the only thing i could ever complain about is maybe the controls being a bit clunky and some animations aswell butThis game gets way too much hate. you can play it completely without even looking at the micro transaction store. in my eyes it a nice military shooter to play with cool customization and so far a interesting story. the gameplay is really fun and in some ways realistic and the only thing i could ever complain about is maybe the controls being a bit clunky and some animations aswell but other than that its amazing.… Expand
  40. SamuraiJapan
    Oct 6, 2019
    0
    Донат просто везде! Pay-to-win система в полном объеме. Ужасное управление транспортом, скучный геймплей. Меню сильно перегружено - ничего не понятно.
  41. Wenceslas
    Oct 6, 2019
    9
    I realy do not get all the negative reviews, from my point of view its a realy cool and fun game that polished everything i did not like on Wildlands.
    And in kind of micro transactions, i am not a fan do not get me wrong, but it is not a pay to win model, what you do with a blueprint of a fancy weapon if its still just on your actual level, right, its like all the weapons you find on your    I realy do not get all the negative reviews, from my point of view its a realy cool and fun game that polished everything i did not like on Wildlands.
    And in kind of micro transactions, i am not a fan do not get me wrong, but it is not a pay to win model, what you do with a blueprint of a fancy weapon if its still just on your actual level, right, its like all the weapons you find on your way nothing special..
    What i do not like a some realy nasty bugs, hope they will deal with it in the next updates.    … Expand
  42. Flymingo
    Oct 6, 2019
    0
    Ubisoft is offering the full product range of things nobody wants. Microtransactions. Check. A vast but basically empty open world with no real points of interest. Check. A loot system that pushes you towards said microtransactions. Check. I’m really saddened by what Ubisoft has done to this once great franchise. I had much fun with wildlands and future soldier but what breakpoint broughtUbisoft is offering the full product range of things nobody wants. Microtransactions. Check. A vast but basically empty open world with no real points of interest. Check. A loot system that pushes you towards said microtransactions. Check. I’m really saddened by what Ubisoft has done to this once great franchise. I had much fun with wildlands and future soldier but what breakpoint brought to the table is a disgrace.… Expand
  43. Sumchanin
    Oct 6, 2019
    1
    За такую цену столько багов и донаааата. Нет, спасибо!
  44. 27joe
    Oct 4, 2019
    10
    First of all great story
    There are a good amount of bugs but not any game ruining ones that I have encountered it's a good game just because you watch a review saying it's bad doesn't mean it is that's just someone's opinion you may like it and microtransactions aren't the whole game there is more to it than that. That's just a bad thing about it. I say buy it if you liked wildlands you    First of all great story
    There are a good amount of bugs but not any game ruining ones that I have encountered it's a good game just because you watch a review saying it's bad doesn't mean it is that's just someone's opinion you may like it and microtransactions aren't the whole game there is more to it than that. That's just a bad thing about it. I say buy it if you liked wildlands you will probably like breakpoint even more

    P.S.
    If you haven't seen anything but a bad review and haven't bought/played then why are writing a bad review ? Just try it and see if you like it yourself or just don't write a review.    … Expand
  45. Raideruk
    Oct 6, 2019
    0
    Worst game I think I've played, especially for a AAA release. Wildlands is a much more refined game and that's two years old. Running this game on a RTX2070,I may as well be running it on a GTX780. The textures are really low fidelity. You can clearly see squares on most items, I think Minecraft has better resolutions. Characters look like plastic, so shiny, you can almost see the worldWorst game I think I've played, especially for a AAA release. Wildlands is a much more refined game and that's two years old. Running this game on a RTX2070,I may as well be running it on a GTX780. The textures are really low fidelity. You can clearly see squares on most items, I think Minecraft has better resolutions. Characters look like plastic, so shiny, you can almost see the world reflecting off their skin.

    Game movement feels juddery and very sporadic, almost to a point where you feel like you're detached from the character.
    The further fact that you can buy your skill levels puts it on a par with Star Wars Battlefront 2. The game is littered with micro transactions. Don't expect to get too much enjoyment from this game, it is clearly an attempt by uplay to make money from nothing. I'm glad I didn't buy the whole game and used uplay+ to try it out, otherwise I would have been £50 in the hole for something I uninstalled 2 hours after installing.

    Such a shame, I was really looking forward to this one. For such a large company and a great franchise, this one really falls below par.    … Expand
  46. Klaus_Ferrano
    Oct 6, 2019
    8
    Tolles Spiel, schöne idee und so gut wie keine Bugs. Kann es nur empfehlen.
  47. Steves84
    Oct 6, 2019
    2
    Fail.......................................................................
  48. rallybilen
    Oct 6, 2019
    1
    This game showcase exactly what is bad with the gaming industry today. They are great in marketing the game but it shows nothing about what the game will be like. The game feels like a skeleton with no soul put into it. The graphics are decent but far from good on my RTX 2080. It is mainly go here and go there. So empty and by far one of the worst games I have ever played. It isThis game showcase exactly what is bad with the gaming industry today. They are great in marketing the game but it shows nothing about what the game will be like. The game feels like a skeleton with no soul put into it. The graphics are decent but far from good on my RTX 2080. It is mainly go here and go there. So empty and by far one of the worst games I have ever played. It is facininating that game companies can create so bad games and still make a lot of money. And they fool people who don't know any better and waste their money on this.… Expand
  49. 1Jabka11
    Oct 6, 2019
    3
    Я сформировал свое мнение по бете и по роликам на Ютубе.

    Проблема игры в том, что с предыдущей игры(Wildlands) ничего не изменилось. Зато появились микротранзакции, которых очень много и они ломают геймплей, с которым все не очень. Стрельба средняя, про графику молчу. Графика в игре хуже чем в Mafia lll. Транспорт просто ужасен(Это проблема всех игр Ubisoft). Я не советую ее покупать,    Я сформировал свое мнение по бете и по роликам на Ютубе.

    Проблема игры в том, что с предыдущей игры(Wildlands) ничего не изменилось. Зато появились микротранзакции, которых очень много и они ломают геймплей, с которым все не очень. Стрельба средняя, про графику молчу. Графика в игре хуже чем в Mafia lll. Транспорт просто ужасен(Это проблема всех игр Ubisoft). Я не советую ее покупать, особенно тем у кого есть Wildlands.    … Expand
  50. Maximilianp4321
    Oct 6, 2019
    1
    If you Love wildlands you will hate breakpoint. Bad Game lot of micotransactions.
  51. DoctorCalamari
    Oct 5, 2019
    2
    This game isn't even good enough to be awful. It is a microtransaction- infested, buggy, unplayable mess. That I get barely any play time on because the online servers for the CAMPAIGN kicked me out for a few hours. Well that just does it then, hm?
  52. Fuggaminchoja
    Oct 5, 2019
    0
    Bland world, repetitive busy work tasks, terrible ai, crappy physics, ugly graphics, microtransactions up the wazoo. This game is just terrible.
  53. Sobbsy
    Oct 5, 2019
    7
    Not what Ghost Recon fans wanted for a ghost recon game, but in saying that for
    What it is , it’s a good play. Not what I expected as a ghost recon fan but still a good play. Quite a few bugs that need ironing out and the RPG elements where just not needed. They have added some very cool stuff like the prone camouflage
    And so on. And the tactic game play is there depending how you play the    Not what Ghost Recon fans wanted for a ghost recon game, but in saying that for
    What it is , it’s a good play. Not what I expected as a ghost recon fan but still a good play. Quite a few bugs that need ironing out and the RPG elements where just not needed. They have added some very cool stuff like the prone camouflage
    And so on. And the tactic game play is there depending how you play the game. Ubisoft need to go back to the table and reconsider what fans of the franchise really want which is a good tactical shooter. Not a tactical shooter trying to
    be something else.    … Expand
  54. dustinsaunders
    Oct 5, 2019
    0
    Here is a list of redeeming qualities:


    And so, the game is just bad. The microtransactions exceed that of a free to play.
  55. Hecate2014
    Oct 5, 2019
    2
    Cons:

    Big, beautiful open world with basically nothing to do. There are enemies and camps scattered everywhere, but they are just there to try to convince you that the open world is not completely useless. Typical Ubisoft open world, but this time it is much worse than previous ones. Microtransactions. Part of cosmetics are purchasable using ingame currency, and part of them can ONLY    Cons:

    Big, beautiful open world with basically nothing to do. There are enemies and camps scattered everywhere, but they are just there to try to convince you that the open world is not completely useless. Typical Ubisoft open world, but this time it is much worse than previous ones.

    Microtransactions. Part of cosmetics are purchasable using ingame currency, and part of them can ONLY be purchased in Ubisoft store. Moreover, there are "time savers" purchasable with real money in the store that allow you to skip certain amount of grinding. Since publisher wants to earn money, it is extremely likely that the game is designed to be utterly grindy so that people are urged to purchase time savers to skip to the fun part.

    Gear score and tiered loot. Before any "one shot headshot kills everything" counterargument, I finished the main campaign with GS 50, so I know well about that. From technical perspective, the problem with GS is that it is tied to enemy perception, so if your GS is lower than theirs, they can just magically see you far away. From immersion perspective, it is utterly garbage. No idea why a bonnie hat provides more protection than a FAST ballistic helmet. They could have made this a little bit better. Helmet provides resistance, bonnie hat provides mobility and concealment etc. Ghost Recon, from this point on, will never be a hardcore military tactical shooter. My assumption is that it is added in to artificially expand the limited gameplay. Developers' lame defense suggests that it is implemented to create variety in players' builds. It is a lie. Variety can be created in a million ways, such as unique perks, skills, meaningful attachments, deeper gun modification, etc.

    Guns. In a tactical shooter game, basically nothing is more important than the gun. In this game, TAC-50 uses .338 rounds instead of .50, and MP7, one of my favorite submachine guns, uses 9mm rounds instead of the iconic 4.6mm. When a game about using guns screws up the gun, good job.

    A game built around microtransactions. This game uses many methods to either force players to socialize or keep players online as long as possible. The game has a social hub, which is not only immersion-breaking but also useless. It presumably forces players to purchase cosmetic items to show off to strangers. Battle reward system is placed in the game so that players feel the need to log into the game everyday, therefore they have a better chance of making a purchase in the store.

    AIs are bad. Not as bad as those in betas, but still bad.

    Bullet sponge drones. Well, developers have to do something to justify the lame tiered loot and GS system.

    Muticam locked behind raid. Basically developers way of saying "Please stay in the game. I know the game is bland and boring, but, please, you will one day get your favorite multicam." People are forced to grind for GS to participate in raid to get multicam.

    Pros:

    Graphic. I never doubt Ubisoft's ability to make a beautiful open world. Graphic in this game is awesome.

    Prone camouflage is a good idea, and nicely executed. It is satisfying to see my character just "melt" into the ground while pointing my gun forward, like a sniper waiting for his/her prey. That is awesome, especially when you use the game to capture interesting picture.

    Movement. Besides some inconsistency migrated from Wildlands, such as you suddenly cannot vault over or climb up something (with full stamina FYI) while you can do that to identical things. Movement system is pretty good assuming character is carrying a 50 kg backpack. Sliding downhill is fun, but the fun stops when sliding downhill screws up my control scheme. But this bug will likely be fixed easily.

    *Stared at the screen for 10 minutes and admit that those 3 are the only pros I can come up with*

    All in all. The game is raw. It feels like that it should have been baked for a few month more to both iron out glitches and add something interesting. The game can be fun if you are not a hardcore GR fan starting the first game in the series. I just hope one day, Ghost Recon can return to its root. Not all games need to look the same, play the same, and feel the same. There are looter shooters out there, and let them be looter shooters. Please do not just smash looter shooter genre into Ghost Recon, especially if executed this poorly.

    My English is kinda crappy, sorry about that.    … Expand
  56. Tyguy911
    Oct 5, 2019
    4
    The bad.. Confusing menus, terrible IA, unfinished, poor story, developed for micro transactions, and I could on and on... This is horrible, truely ruined.

    The good.. The map is pretty.
  57. DanTheMan1992
    Oct 5, 2019
    0
    Ubisoft are greedy and F*****G disgusting because this is a Pay-To-Win $60/$100 game of utter s**t and the way they abuse the Tom Clancy Licence is just sad and am sick of it so guys do not buy this Beta Test garbage because your better off saving your money and the story line is just terrible the side quests are repetitive the controls on the Vehicles are a joke and the micro transactionsUbisoft are greedy and F*****G disgusting because this is a Pay-To-Win $60/$100 game of utter s**t and the way they abuse the Tom Clancy Licence is just sad and am sick of it so guys do not buy this Beta Test garbage because your better off saving your money and the story line is just terrible the side quests are repetitive the controls on the Vehicles are a joke and the micro transactions my god they trying to make you look stupid and forcing you to waste your money so don't fall for it and you will keep getting a lot of crashes so F**K you Ubisoft and F**K Ghost Recon Breakpoint -_-… Expand
  58. PeasantGamer
    Oct 5, 2019
    1
    This game is a piece of junk. I bought 2 copies and wish I could get my money back. These greedy people at ubisoft need to be shut down for releasing something like this. This game is incomplete. Who ever at ubisoft was in charge of this game should come out and apologies and buy back this junk from everyone he just robbed.
  59. R34P3R_85
    Oct 5, 2019
    6
    - empty boring world
    - loot system
    - rpg system - bad writing - enemys for kids (Iron mask, superman cape) - boring mission design - drones - bulletsponge - menue overloaded - player hub does not fit into story - microtransactions - map is overloaded and icons still apears after base is cleared + video quality + shooting makes fun + 3D person + animations and movement +    - empty boring world
    - loot system
    - rpg system
    - bad writing
    - enemys for kids (Iron mask, superman cape)
    - boring mission design
    - drones
    - bulletsponge
    - menue overloaded
    - player hub does not fit into story
    - microtransactions
    - map is overloaded and icons still apears after base is cleared

    + video quality
    + shooting makes fun
    + 3D person
    + animations and movement
    + some good and imersive quests (bunker, side mission)    … Expand
  60. tottyNA
    Oct 5, 2019
    9
    People are being idiots with the scoring. Honestly it's a lack of intelligence and youtube-formed opinion, if not lack of imagination on how to play in a sand box. Some complain about MTX, some complain about it being boring. That's because many are playing it in a really boring way. Take Metal Gear Solid 5, make it Coop in an open world with vehicles, rocket launchers, a litany of waysPeople are being idiots with the scoring. Honestly it's a lack of intelligence and youtube-formed opinion, if not lack of imagination on how to play in a sand box. Some complain about MTX, some complain about it being boring. That's because many are playing it in a really boring way. Take Metal Gear Solid 5, make it Coop in an open world with vehicles, rocket launchers, a litany of ways you can go about murdering your way to the top, and the emergent risk-reward randomized missions like convoys, hostage rescue, assassinations; the base takeover staple is not the only thing you do in this game, in other words.
    I thin the people who are review bombing this game honestly are just not aware of just how much fun dumb stuff there is to the game, if you 'what if I put C4 on this helicopter and...____', it's a lot more fun than hugging one piece of cover and snipe your way through the world. I think a lot of people are doing that (some I know are loving it this way), but for those who assume that's all there is, start treating this game more like Mercenaries or Farcry in terms of using gadets and different methods of play, and you have a great looking, solid gun-play touting open sandbox filled with red barrel explosions and Metal Gear tech to try and survive encounters with. It's great, like wildlands was, even if the obtuse gearscore, and misunderstood MTX shop that 1:1 replicates the Wildlands/Division 2 model, some how is destracting enough for people to review bomb this arcadey military action world game before they actually play enough to understand how to create the fun scenarios that you can only find in the most recent Ghost Recon games. It's not always tactical stealth, sometimes it's rocket launchers from a helicopter seat. It's up to you on that, and to say this game sucks as far as a current 2.2 is just being stupid. Give the game more credit than your limited creativity while playing it shows in 99.9 of these 0 score reviews that...just aren't reviews.

    The game can be a mess, but a hot mess, full of ridiculous. For people playing it by the numbers, you're missing half the fun. Give it the action-movie try before you decide to focus so hard on how much optional, and often in-game-currency-buyable MTX stuff there is. That's missing the whole game for a stance on MTX that is identical to several other games out now, which in absolutely no way affect the gameplay or the quality of the game itself. Which happens to be quite good. Not perfect, but fun, as crazy as you can come up with. Fun, they call that, which in a sandbox game, like GTA, is left up to you to 'what if I ___', and see how it goes. This game, just like wildlands, excells at this, and I'm happy to leave the negative nitpicking crowd in the mud while I place mines around a base, leave, pour a drink, and wait for the fireworks show.    … Expand
  61. Phillip775
    Oct 5, 2019
    1
    a big step backwards from wildlands, that i loved. this is just an unfinished mess of a game thats so buggy, that if you end up finish the game, then i gotta congratz you, i could hardly play more than 1 hour, but end up finishing the game anyway, oh that ending. and its a looter shooter now`? why? what happend to the name "breakpoint"? this is not what was advertised, a mediocre casuala big step backwards from wildlands, that i loved. this is just an unfinished mess of a game thats so buggy, that if you end up finish the game, then i gotta congratz you, i could hardly play more than 1 hour, but end up finishing the game anyway, oh that ending. and its a looter shooter now`? why? what happend to the name "breakpoint"? this is not what was advertised, a mediocre casual shooter at best, but at all close to being the hardcore survival game we all hoped for....terrible idea. make a new ip instead… Expand
  62. F34RDragonz
    Oct 5, 2019
    3
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Beta was ugly and bugged. Day one, full of same said bugs and horrible game glitches that ruin the experience. Character customization is a joke. Having the punisher as your villain is cool, but doesn’t make this game great. Save your money.… Expand
  63. ENNOTICH
    Oct 5, 2019
    1
    Участвовал в бета тесте и желания больше смотреть на эту серию Ghost Recon больше нет!
  64. paulust2002
    Oct 5, 2019
    0
    Unfinished, bug ridden, un-polished, dated which has been built around a free to play model and not enticing game loops. Open world is uninteresting and cheap. Everything seems like a cost saving tactic: the lack of character lines so they don't make sense, dire physics, and even a step back from Wildlands which had it's faults.

    Endless padding...Missions constantly send you 10k away.    Unfinished, bug ridden, un-polished, dated which has been built around a free to play model and not enticing game loops. Open world is uninteresting and cheap. Everything seems like a cost saving tactic: the lack of character lines so they don't make sense, dire physics, and even a step back from Wildlands which had it's faults.

    Endless padding...Missions constantly send you 10k away.

    Pointless levelling system - as they made money from Assassins Creed Origins boosters. Level 30 Beanie's for F&^&s sake!?

    Made without any passion whatsoever, just another infinished product to ship.

    And it's upsetting, because a great game could be built within this framework. But Ubisoft are becoming a joke.

    Cancelled Uplay + because of this. I'm done.    … Expand
  65. Hijacked_Me
    Oct 5, 2019
    0
    Hardcore Ghost Recon? Not even close, what a joke. This game not only runs horribly but the half baked story is almost difficult to continue to play. Breakpoint is loaded with micro transactions, horrible dialogue, p2w menus, a clear downgrade from Wildlands. Don’t buy this game or support this developer. They given us trash games every single time without fail since Far Cry 3.
  66. Tidytib
    Oct 5, 2019
    1
    have you ever brought the game and the sheer loading time made you wanted to refund the game. Well, this is that game. It's filled with MTX's.My real problem was loading time and really I mean really slow menu (sometimes it felt like browsing on dial-up connection), disconnected servers, blurry graphics. and the horrible character movements, With movement you can feel that this was meanthave you ever brought the game and the sheer loading time made you wanted to refund the game. Well, this is that game. It's filled with MTX's.My real problem was loading time and really I mean really slow menu (sometimes it felt like browsing on dial-up connection), disconnected servers, blurry graphics. and the horrible character movements, With movement you can feel that this was meant for consoles and not Keyboard and mouse.… Expand
  67. PingWing
    Oct 5, 2019
    3
    "How deep can a massive publisher / developer sink?"

    I think this is what must've gone on through the heads of all employee's of Ubisoft, but shivering from fear of losing their jobs, they decided to not say a single word to management, or management simply choose to ignore feedback and criticism. Instead - Ubisoft brought the world the following: - A good looking game. - A game    "How deep can a massive publisher / developer sink?"

    I think this is what must've gone on through the heads of all employee's of Ubisoft, but shivering from fear of losing their jobs, they decided to not say a single word to management, or management simply choose to ignore feedback and criticism.

    Instead - Ubisoft brought the world the following:
    - A good looking game.
    - A game that's fun to play, with your friends, especially when you are drunk and you don't care about using tactics nor effort.

    But sadly, I think with those two points mentioned - that's all the positive I can say about this game, because wow! How did they manage to get this through quality-assurance / quality control, the game is:
    - Buggy
    - Tons of micro-transactions, all optional, it's not as if you have to buy it, but ... come on guys most of these add nothing new to the game compared to what you already paid for (you can literally pay money to unlock a weapon, that you can already get for free in game).
    - Boring & repetitive, as A.I. will simply spawn in the same position over and over again during defend objectives.
    - Cheaply "balanced" - as in, you have something called: "gear score" / levels of your equipment, if your score is too low - due to outdated gear - you'll do less damage a system similar to TC: The Division, and I wasn't too happy about that game either.

    On top of that, you can clearly notice where A.I. spawns, as you might've just checked a certain corner / bush - and then a couple seconds later: Bam - an enemy in a previously cleared sector, as someone who likes to play a bit tactical and challenging (as was possible in TC: Wildlands !) - this completely ruined my gameplay.

    And no - I didn't mind them not putting this game on Steam, but I do hate myself for not being able to refund this anymore as it was hardly worth the effort.

    If you are reading this -> please, spend your money elsewhere or wait until they apologize and fix this garbage.    … Expand
  68. Nikksukka
    Oct 5, 2019
    0
    Absolutely horrible.
    The game is a payment terminal disquised as Ghost Recon.
    + Breakipoint is full of bugs and the gameplay is worse than earlier games in the series.
  69. ArtNin
    Oct 5, 2019
    1
    for that kind of money, such a piece of an unfinished game, with bugs, and even with the store inside. Hackwork
  70. Bruutahl
    Oct 5, 2019
    0
    Wow.. just wow.. I really love the Ghost Recon series, especially Wildlands, but this game is totally trash! Ubisoft just killed an amazing franchise!
  71. MykytaP
    Oct 5, 2019
    5
    This game has some mechanics that i like and i want to like this game. Feels like a Ghost Recon trying really hard to be like an Assassins Creed game, but feels much cheaper and unpolished. The wold of this game is lifeleess ai is bad. It's even worse than Wildlands one. The combat makes more sense than Division's.The fans of old Ghost Recon wont like this game.
  72. FPS_lover
    Oct 5, 2019
    0
    плюсы:
    нет
    _________________________ Минусы -Убрали микротранзакции, чтобы добавить попозже -нет кнопки: заплатите 59,99$ чтобы перейти к финальной катсцене -РПГ элементы тут ради галочки, любой противник падает от одного попадания в голову, даже рейд босса можно пложить двумя ЭМИ гранатами -мало пушек, -скучный, пустой, открытый мир -физика транспорта как в первом Watch dogs 1    плюсы:
    нет
    _________________________
    Минусы
    -Убрали микротранзакции, чтобы добавить попозже
    -нет кнопки: заплатите 59,99$ чтобы перейти к финальной катсцене
    -РПГ элементы тут ради галочки, любой противник падает от одного попадания в голову, даже рейд босса можно пложить двумя ЭМИ гранатами
    -мало пушек,
    -скучный, пустой, открытый мир
    -физика транспорта как в первом Watch dogs 1
    -бессмысленные системы из выживастиков, которые скорее бесят, чем способствуют вовлечению
    -СКУКА СКУКА СКУКА СКУКА СКУКА СКУКА СКУКА СКУКА СКУКА СКУКА СКУКА СКУКА
    -поддержка игры будет состоять в течении АЖ 4 РЭЙДОВ

    игра говно,автор быдло. 0/10 микротранзакций    … Expand
  73. Laviar
    Oct 5, 2019
    0
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Эту игру можно охарактеризовать тремя пунктами.
    1. Донат наше все! В буквальном смысле можно пройти игру за донат.
    2. Баги уже норма для Ubisoft. Тут они переплюнули даже себя! Что сказать? развиваются, но не в лучшую сторону.
    3. Луууууууут. Много лута непонятно зачем!
    Предыдущая часть была не идеальной, но в нее можно было играть! Я надеялся что в новой части они изменять ситуацию в лучшую сторону. увы    … Expand
  74. jkappa
    Oct 5, 2019
    1
    Ubisoft took everything that was good about Wildlands, reskinned it, added a game glitches and terrible voice acting, then tied it all together with a flimsy joke of a storyline. They have delivered utter garbage and this game is a clear money grab and a huge step backwards for the franchise. Totally patronising to any serious gamer.
  75. Sefelim
    Oct 4, 2019
    0
    Typical Ubisoft. Clumsy gameplay, dumb plot, lots of chests. It's not ghosts, it's metrosexuals who are looking for clothes all over the island.
    Let's look at the game in a year, when all updates come out. In the meantime, the game is 40% ready.
  76. siksik
    Oct 4, 2019
    0
    Full of bugs with pay to win monetization , same copy paste again n again what a waste of time
  77. Molson_Canadian
    Oct 4, 2019
    2
    This game was literally made from the ground up, so that micro-transactions can be implemented in a huge way. This is shown by the rpg elements(gear lvls) and the social hub. The game has shown to have so many problems, the AI enemy being stupid and not a challenge, the 'survival element' they advertised being non existent, the missions being dull and repetitive, and the pay to winThis game was literally made from the ground up, so that micro-transactions can be implemented in a huge way. This is shown by the rpg elements(gear lvls) and the social hub. The game has shown to have so many problems, the AI enemy being stupid and not a challenge, the 'survival element' they advertised being non existent, the missions being dull and repetitive, and the pay to win micro-transactions.... In addition, the world feels empty compared to Wildlands, yes i know the story is different but still it just feels empty with the lack of civs. This core of the game is not a ghost recon game. This game is a combination of destiny, division and Wildlands. For me Wildlands was a great game if you played with a good group of friends. I was hoping they would add on to what they did with Wildlands and make it better, but sadly they went the other direction and failed with BreakPoint. The game itself does not know what it is, is it a realistic shooter? is it a looter shooter? is it an RPG? The developers tried to implement so many different elements into the game so that they could add allot of micro transactions. This mutilated form of a ghost recon game resulted in its breaking point.… Expand
  78. blueducky160
    Oct 4, 2019
    0
    I bought this game in California (Pacific Daylight Time) 10/3/19, the game released on 10/4/19 today, they refused to give me any pre-order items. Like excuse me? Even when I was in the Uplay store it said, "Preorder Now", not "Buy Now".. sooo yah. False advertisement, and petty.
  79. renegade_mastr
    Oct 4, 2019
    0
    I REALLY wanted this game to be good. Even as I found more and more things wrong with it, I still played just hoping it would make me love it the way Wildlands did. But it didn't. After almost constant frustration I have to say this game is one of the biggest let downs of a game I've ever seen. The game has potential, the idea of the game is a great one. The execution of said idea,I REALLY wanted this game to be good. Even as I found more and more things wrong with it, I still played just hoping it would make me love it the way Wildlands did. But it didn't. After almost constant frustration I have to say this game is one of the biggest let downs of a game I've ever seen. The game has potential, the idea of the game is a great one. The execution of said idea, absolutely abysmal!

    Let's start from the beginning. I woke up bright and early at 5AM where Iive so I could play the game as soon as it came out. There I am watching the Uplay launcher where it says "Coming soon", the clock rolls over to 5 and nothing changes. I close the launcher and reopen it hoping that changes it. Nope. minutes pass by, nothing changes, then hours go by (sooooo glad I woke up early for this) and still nothing. I tried updating by drivers, uninstalling the game and Uplay and reinstalling them both. Still, nothing! Finally about 6 hours after the game released it said "Play" and I was filled with joy. I click play, wait for the logo screens to go by, press space to start... and the servers are down. I look around online to see if I'm the only one having these problems and nope I'm in NO way alone. 2 hours after this the servers are finally up and at this point I had already lost a bit of hope for the game after reading other people's reviews but I wanted to try it for myself.

    The very first thing I found was a very lackluster character creator. Literally you get to choose face shape (which also chooses race), eye color, hair style, hair color, and facial hair. That's all! And there aren't many options for these things either. No clothes, no detailed face customizer, nothing.

    So I create my character (which took less than 2 minutes) and watch the opening cutscene. As soon as I get to the first playable part of the game I immediately notice the graphics quality has been set to satan's butthole levels of low. Keep in mind I have a 2080 graphics card and tons of Vram and the game looks like it was made 10 years ago. So I get to settings and change everything to where it should be. Cool.

    The first few minutes of play involve a lot of changing the controls because WOW are they bad when you first start. There are a lot of buttons that do 2 or 3 completely different things depending on whether you're aiming, prone, or just running. Makes NO sense.

    Now let's move onto the actual gameplay because it was only after all of this that I actually got to play at all (8.5 hours after release). This game does combat very well, I will say that. The enemies spread out as they're moving towards you, and generally you have to watch your back a lot. The problem comes when you look at pretty much everything else. The looting system seems cool until in 10 chests you get 5 Dragunovs, 3 M4s, and 2 of the same LMG. The gear system makes no sense as a level 5 bandana protects your head more than a level 4 combat helmet. The car handling and driving controls have no bearing on reality whatsoever. There are many cars that get up to full speed in 1 gear, and your car is either as grippy as an F1 car, or you're spinning wildly out of control, there is no in between. Drones are annoying with how random they are. Plenty of times I would have to stop in the middle of a mission and go hide. I tried shooting one down but within 3 seconds Elites had completely surrounded me and brought smaller drones with them.

    Hold on I need to catch my breath.. Done, let's continue.

    The daily missions seem cool until you realize right from the start you're getting dailies that say you need to be level TWO MOTHERLOVING HUNDRED to complete. I thought "surely they must be joking, they wouldn't put this on my map if it were impossible" but nah they one shot you. One super annoying thing is the skill/perk system. When I started I got a few skills but realized not much was changing. That's when I realized that half the crap in the skill tree are actually "perks" which are way better but you can only have ONE active at a time and they don't mention this at all. The really stupid part of this system is that to unlock more things to spend points on, you have to spend points in specific categories. What this means is that you'll end up having to spend points on things that you don't want, "perks" you're not gonna use, and things that aren't even really helpful just so that later you can maybe get more useful stuff.

    The list goes on and on and on but at the end of the day there's SO much in this game that makes you say "Why? Why would you make it that way? Why would you put that in the game? Did you not test anything?" and by the time you stop to actually look at the game objectively you realize that the game is more frustrating than it is fun. Sure, it has it's moments, as few and as far between as they may be. And I truly hope that in the future Ubisoft do their best to remedy all of the issues with this game. But for now. I'm clicking Uninstall.    … Expand
  80. HenriMatisse
    Oct 4, 2019
    0
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Character creation look retarded. This **** retarded… Expand
  81. Astantos
    Oct 4, 2019
    0
    Let me lead by saying that I loved playing Ghost Recon Wildlands. The world was interesting, the controls felt natural, firing your weapons felt satisfying, the stealth was mostly balanced and the gameplay was fun, even if a tad repetitive.

    Unfortunately, Breakpoint is none of these things. The very first thing I noticed as soon as I loaded into the game was the introduction - or    Let me lead by saying that I loved playing Ghost Recon Wildlands. The world was interesting, the controls felt natural, firing your weapons felt satisfying, the stealth was mostly balanced and the gameplay was fun, even if a tad repetitive.

    Unfortunately, Breakpoint is none of these things.

    The very first thing I noticed as soon as I loaded into the game was the introduction - or rather, lack of one. Sure, there's a advertisement video from the bad guys, but that's it. Then you are straight into the character creation screen. There was nothing to get me actually hooked and interested in what is about to happen. Maybe that would have been alright if I haven't played Wildlands, but I have, and this intro can't even be called a shadow of that one. This pretty much sets the tone for the rest of the game.

    By the time I was minutes into the first opening mission, I was already struggling to keep interested. Third person controls are always a hit and miss, with so many considerations that first person simply does not have. I felt Wildlands did a pretty good job. Breakpoint . . . doesn't. Movement is clunky, awkward, and I almost felt like my character had a permanent limp - which I thought was by design at first (because of what happens in the intro mission) but nope. Your character simply moves that way, like an awkward 3 legged llama. And I haven't even started talking about the aiming and shooting mechanics.

    I have never had quite so much trouble just shooting through a window. When I walked up to the window in question, the window sill was barely waist high. When I tried to actually aim through the window, however, it felt like I was suddenly a toddler carrying a bazooka. Your character also has a penchant for leaving cover in the worst of situations like . . . say . . . while being blasted at by two gatling guns. Apparently, turning around while in cover (middle mouse button in Wildlands) is too difficult a concept to grasp. It's much easier to move away from the cover and move back into it.

    And yes, you WILL be blasted at. If you were hoping for an amazing stealth game with a team of Ghosts, taking out entire bases like . . . well, ghosts, prepare to be disappointed. There are no AI teammates in this game. At all. Apparently, that's something that's coming soon (tm). If you have friends, you can ask them to play with you. If you don't have any, or just hate people, you're gonna have to fight the entire paramilitary force on your own. While technically you can still stealth your way through the entire game, taking out an entire area without raising a single alert has pretty much gone out the window - if you were fighting a bunch of weapon bearing guards.

    The problem is, weapon bearing guards are the least of your worries. You see, the thing about this game is the drones. You can't get a headshot on a drone, because they don't have heads. You can't CQC assassinate a drone because . . . again, they don't have heads. Or guts. Or groins. You can't even snipe a drone because it took me 3 shots to kill one - and that's with the right sniper rifle for my level, because yes. This game now has item levels.

    Drone are everywhere in this game. Like every other enemy you face, they have levels. Unlike every other (human) enemy you face, you can't kill them with one hit - so if you wanted to challenge yourself by going to a late game area, good luck. They are there to act as bullet sponges in a way human enemies can't. Not only do items have levels, items also have qualities. If you've ever played Division or Division 2, this is the same thing. You almost certainly will get into a fully fledged firefight - even if you are Deadshot with 100% accuracy. I think that's gonna be a "nope" to the stealth.

    If you've ever played the Division, then you might remember being able to see other players in the "common" bases. That's now the case for Breakpoint. It's no longer a single player game with coop available. It's a multiplayer game that can be played in single player.

    All of that, and I haven't even talked about the many, many technical issues many players have reported. I haven't mentioned them because, well, I haven't actually experienced any. That's unfortunately the only positive feedback I can give about this game right now.

    This game is an atrocity bearing the Ghost Recon name. It's pretty much the Division 2.5, rather than a good successor to Wildlands. Everything that made Wildlands fun has been stripped out, but don't worry - you can buy these in the in game shop.    … Expand
  82. Danceswithsheep
    Oct 4, 2019
    3
    For all the micro transactions this game is missing some important ones. The ones that enable a challenging enemy, the one that puts some life into the world and the one that doesn’t have the game chest on you (spotted by a drone, watch a platoon of enemies magically appear from behind a tree you walked around just moments before). Mind you it’s easy to cheat yourself, make a noise in aFor all the micro transactions this game is missing some important ones. The ones that enable a challenging enemy, the one that puts some life into the world and the one that doesn’t have the game chest on you (spotted by a drone, watch a platoon of enemies magically appear from behind a tree you walked around just moments before). Mind you it’s easy to cheat yourself, make a noise in a building doorway and everybody rushes to you for easy kills. The faces of the characters are as bland as the plot. There are vehicles every hundred yards or so in case you get tired and ofc the whole game is online only even when your playing single player. There is one achievement though that Ubisoft are now up there with EA in pure avarice and disdain for the gamer.

    I was so excited for the next Watch Dogs, now I’m already raising a glass to its memory given what Ubisoft are charging us for here/    … Expand
  83. MentholRenegade
    Oct 4, 2019
    2
    Disappointing and disgusted. Let's make this quick, I'm too irritated for long descriptions.

    The worst part of this travesty is the Gun/Enemy level system. Please kill it. Take a pillow and suffocate it, this isn't The Division 3. Nor is it Fortnite, no matter how much you want it to be. Speaking of which, this is Ghost Recon, why can no one swear? All I hear is ridiculous, contradictory    Disappointing and disgusted. Let's make this quick, I'm too irritated for long descriptions.

    The worst part of this travesty is the Gun/Enemy level system. Please kill it. Take a pillow and suffocate it, this isn't The Division 3. Nor is it Fortnite, no matter how much you want it to be. Speaking of which, this is Ghost Recon, why can no one swear? All I hear is ridiculous, contradictory dialogue with a terribly obvious agenda. Ubisoft, don't push politics through a military shooter. Please.
    You already broke your promise on improved AI teammates (Now there are none because...?). And don't you DARE say your intentions were to increase realism. Ugh.    … Expand
  84. Wolfaiel
    Oct 4, 2019
    2
    Janky free to play mechanics. Story flat and boring. Wildlands was better on every level.
  85. Nightstabber
    Oct 4, 2019
    0
    Its saddens me to swe the franchise turn out like this. Please dont ruin the rest of the tim clancy games with the same monetization
  86. Balorn
    Oct 4, 2019
    1
    I regret getting this game, based on the early advertising, I thought I was buying an improved version of Wildlands, but no. It does look better, but the AI is dumb, the animations are just slightly odd, the placement of enemies is silly. The transactions and shop is absurd. I'm playing it solo and I hate the way it keeps telling me to invite other players, I'm not going to encourage anyI regret getting this game, based on the early advertising, I thought I was buying an improved version of Wildlands, but no. It does look better, but the AI is dumb, the animations are just slightly odd, the placement of enemies is silly. The transactions and shop is absurd. I'm playing it solo and I hate the way it keeps telling me to invite other players, I'm not going to encourage any of my friends to play this game. I hope Ubisoft learn to not do this again with future games.… Expand
  87. HoellenBewohner
    Oct 4, 2019
    4
    **** macrotransactions aka "RPG" elements ruin the game
    unpolished, empty repetitive world
    not worth 60€ may be 20€
  88. Tooterfish
    Oct 4, 2019
    5
    My issue is not so much that it is a "boring game", because it is the same repetitive copy/paste formula you would expect from an Ubisoft open world game. Rather, despite some patches of fun and immersive sections the game is ridden with technical issues, the kind that require a hard reset of your machine. It is also worth noting that this is not a tactical shooter, it's more of an RPG. InMy issue is not so much that it is a "boring game", because it is the same repetitive copy/paste formula you would expect from an Ubisoft open world game. Rather, despite some patches of fun and immersive sections the game is ridden with technical issues, the kind that require a hard reset of your machine. It is also worth noting that this is not a tactical shooter, it's more of an RPG. In fact, it is very much Farcry or Assassin's Creed without the engaging story and addictive gameplay loops.

    As for the monetization, it's all there as other users are reporting. However, I think the complaints are fairly exaggerated. After about 20 hours I have not felt pressure to visit the in game store, and I'm not being pestered by it, so it's easily ignored.

    If you're a Wildlands fan, should you buy it? Sadly, probably not. In my opinion you will be disappointed. I purchased a month of Uplay+ and it's something I play on the side. In that sense it's worth it to me. Otherwise, I'd skip it and play Division 2 or the other aforementioned games instead.    … Expand
  89. Reace14
    Oct 4, 2019
    10
    In before the whiny kids tank the score because of "zomg microtransactions!!!11!!1". It's a great game. Microtransactions don't effect your game one but if you don't want them to. Not one but. Nearly all of the bad scores have never even played the game. It's only out if you bought the goldor ultimate editions. If you're so che that you hate microtransactions, chances aren't going to payIn before the whiny kids tank the score because of "zomg microtransactions!!!11!!1". It's a great game. Microtransactions don't effect your game one but if you don't want them to. Not one but. Nearly all of the bad scores have never even played the game. It's only out if you bought the goldor ultimate editions. If you're so che that you hate microtransactions, chances aren't going to pay extra for a premium edition. In other words, almost all of these negative scores are posted by liars.… Expand
  90. P4TTON
    Oct 4, 2019
    10
    it has been said many times, I do not understand that we can put 0/10 for this game.
    It reveals as much of the stupidity as the lack of discernment ...
    Make your own opinion. UPLAY + 14 / month ... crazy!
  91. Shishu
    Oct 4, 2019
    10
    It is a great game with excelent graphics and gameplay. There is an improvement since Wildlands, the shooting is more realistic and the bullets have a higher speed. Also the interaction of the player with the terrain in activities such as climbing is great. I like the various landscapes and the story of the game.
  92. musik92
    Oct 4, 2019
    0
    Amazing how bad this game is. Don't play it even if you get it for free, a huge waste of time.
  93. Helixien
    Oct 4, 2019
    0
    Sadly the PC version does not do any better when it comes to optimization than the PS4 version.
    The main points of PS4 review still stand (duh), bad story, horrible writing, RPG light mechanics no one wanted, MTX mechanics that are an insult, etc.
    But considering that I get to write two reviews, I might as well add a few more points. So, hey, did anyone else notice how the game cant    Sadly the PC version does not do any better when it comes to optimization than the PS4 version.
    The main points of PS4 review still stand (duh), bad story, horrible writing, RPG light mechanics no one wanted, MTX mechanics that are an insult, etc.

    But considering that I get to write two reviews, I might as well add a few more points.
    So, hey, did anyone else notice how the game cant stay consistent with its own story right away? I mean we crash land on the island, being one of the few surviving ghosts and need to get reinforcements, but at the same time we see the hub being filled with other ghosts. How does that make sense from a story perspective? Right, it doesn't.

    Lets also talk enemy AI, its horrible. I am not sure if they put any work into it at all, considering the enemies in the Division 2 are a lot smarter. Or F.E.A.R. and that game was released in 2005. Enemies in that game reacted to my flashlight, meanwhile in this game you shoot someone and the guy next to him reacts in classic Skyrim fashion.

    What else? Whats up with that plane that flies over you from time to time that, when it spots you, instantly spawns two drones and enemies to hunt you down? Who thought that was a good idea? I get that you are being hunted, yes, but this is the laziest implementation I can think of. This is like the forced cut scenes in Far Cry 5.

    All in all, I hate to rate this game low. The foundation is great, its fun. But that fun is ruined and killed by everything else that isn't great or fun,    … Expand
  94. Mindurbidniss
    Oct 4, 2019
    0
    Save your money. It's basically a store, not a game. Also if you do ever get to the gameplay, it's ugly, buggy, and boring
  95. CrazySunDog
    Oct 4, 2019
    4
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This game is schizophrenic.
    -You're all alone, on an island. But you're surrounded by friendly spec-ops in the base?
    -You're a badass SF guy/girl... but u need help learning how to attach things to ur gun?
    -You stalk your prey; quietly sneaking up for the kill, and "oh look a flower I'll pick that for tea later"?
    Ubisoft took a dump on the Ghost Recon brand.    … Expand
  96. SofaJockeyUK
    Oct 4, 2019
    8
    32 hours in I'm really enjoying the tactical stealth gunplay with a layer of light RPG. Easily one of my favorite games of 2019.
  97. dilldaveed
    Oct 4, 2019
    0
    This game has earned a big, fat, zero. It is by all means a completely broken, unpolished, unfinished game, released ONLY to fill up Ubisoft’s greedy pockets. The story is an interesting (albeit unrealistic) concept that completely failed in execution. The gameplay is lacking in so many ways that it definitely would take YEARS to fix at the very least. It’s a damn shame that “badass”This game has earned a big, fat, zero. It is by all means a completely broken, unpolished, unfinished game, released ONLY to fill up Ubisoft’s greedy pockets. The story is an interesting (albeit unrealistic) concept that completely failed in execution. The gameplay is lacking in so many ways that it definitely would take YEARS to fix at the very least. It’s a damn shame that “badass” Bernthal’s name is attached to this.… Expand
  98. bops2hardcore
    Oct 4, 2019
    9
    Great game, most detail world map, only one glitch in 32 hours of gameplay, meaning no bugs.

    Its a fun entry level tactical looter shooter, I like it better then wildlands, even though wildlands has some great ideas in it.

    Nothing is pay to win, almost everything can be earned in game.

    Worth the $60
  99. Pedrobh88
    Oct 4, 2019
    0
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Excessive monetization system, pay to win, INFINITE glitches and bugs during missions (Objectives desapearing, invisible walls, bugging NPCs, bugging vehicles, graffic glitches and all kinds of horror… Expand
  100. ElliotAlderson
    Oct 4, 2019
    0
    This game is so broken you would think it was made by Bethesda. The story is almost nonexistent and what exists is very boring, the are TWO characters in this story, TWO, and one of them is you. The bugs are unbelievable, you fall off the map, the physic in this game is AWFUL, looks like a PS2 game, AI looks like something from Oblivion, enemies get trapped in objects, spawn in front ofThis game is so broken you would think it was made by Bethesda. The story is almost nonexistent and what exists is very boring, the are TWO characters in this story, TWO, and one of them is you. The bugs are unbelievable, you fall off the map, the physic in this game is AWFUL, looks like a PS2 game, AI looks like something from Oblivion, enemies get trapped in objects, spawn in front of you, they also teleport. They didn't even bother to make different models for enemies, I think they only have THREE models for enemies. You will see the same enemy with the same face 300 times in the game, even Goldeneye 64 has more models than this sixty-dollar game. Microtransactions are aggressive, with lootboxes, in-game currency, blocked content. Literally everything I hate about a video game exists in this game, DON'T BUY THIS GARBAGE!… Expand
Page:

Awards & Rankings

12
#12 Most Discussed PC Game of 2019

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
58

Mixed or average reviews - based on 30 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 4 out of 30
  2. Mixed: 21 out of 30
  3. Negative: 5 out of 30
  1. GameWatcher
    Apr 20, 2020
    80
    While we wait for the hopeful announcement of a new Splinter Cell game in the future, Tom Clancy’s fans will be happy to know that Breakpoint is actually fun, now. The new Ghost Mode solved many of the issues that plagued the original version, and while it isn’t fully healed from its painful stint as a non-Ghost Recon game, the latest entry in the franchise is trying its best to course-correct. If you are one of the many people who were put off by it at launch, I would recommend you try and give it a try now – just like the eponymous Group for Specialised Tactics, Ubisoft might yet turn this near-miss of the series’ breakpoint into a franchise victory.
    Read full review
  2. The Overpowered Noobs
    Nov 15, 2019
    70
    Despite the occasionally lonely world and lacking interactivity, the rewarding and creative ways to complete missions make this FPS title a blast to play.
    Read full review
  3. Edge Magazine
    Nov 10, 2019
    40
    The super-soldier fantasy's lost beneath generic mechanisms for grinding. [Issue#139, p.108]
See all critic reviews »