User Score
6.3

Mixed or average reviews- based on 1790 Ratings

User score distribution:
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
  1. Jun 4, 2014
    4
    It's been a couple months since release and unfortunately Titanfall has turned out to be an utterly forgettable title that lost its luster within the first 45 days of release. I'm afraid my initial review must be changed to reflect the current realities of the game. Regeneration challenges aren't enough to keep players around. PC population fell off a cliff in the first month and neverIt's been a couple months since release and unfortunately Titanfall has turned out to be an utterly forgettable title that lost its luster within the first 45 days of release. I'm afraid my initial review must be changed to reflect the current realities of the game. Regeneration challenges aren't enough to keep players around. PC population fell off a cliff in the first month and never recovered. Matchmaking is STILL horrible. There's very little content for the asking price - even less now that there are modes removed from PC version that are still in Xbox One and Xbox 360 versions (Pilot Hunter, specifically). To address this, they'd like you to pay for more maps via DLC! The game is terribly optimized for PC with non-existent support (all Respawn support done through Twitter... what a laugh!). The final product ended up being a hot mess and that's truly a shame because this game seemed to have a lot of potential. Once the novelty of the Titans wears off, most people migrated back to COD for their twitch shooter needs, especially since COD caters to a wide range of players, not just those who want online multiplayer. Also, anyone who writes that the game has a "great story" is either trolling or a shill from EA or Respawn. The "campaign" mode in the game is a joke and the only way to find the backstory on the game is to read it from the Prima Guide! Seriously, the Prima Guide has almost 10 pages dedicated to the back story of the game world and the characters, most of which can't even be found on the official Titanfall site. Expand
  2. Mar 11, 2014
    4
    Ok so here we go ...

    - good but dated graphics. - many good ideas that make this shooter A BIT different. - inclusion of AI opponents is surprising and yet disapointing. - sound is great. - netcoding seem stable with some very minor hiccups. But then again ... - not worth 60$ ... Maybe 40$ but even then ... - lack any kind of innovation ... - AI is downright stupid ... Free
    Ok so here we go ...

    - good but dated graphics.
    - many good ideas that make this shooter A BIT different.
    - inclusion of AI opponents is surprising and yet disapointing.
    - sound is great.
    - netcoding seem stable with some very minor hiccups.

    But then again ...

    - not worth 60$ ... Maybe 40$ but even then ...
    - lack any kind of innovation ...
    - AI is downright stupid ... Free experience points though.
    - 50 gig for that ? ...
    - Campaign through multiplayer ... I'd rather have MW2 singleplayer campaign than what I was given in Titanfall.
    - 6 vs 6 ? I'd rather see this game with 64 players.
    - Too little weapon choice.
    - Yet again, can't choose servers ... And many times over, it'll take you a while to get in game because the servers are too slow to connect and then disconnect for no reasons.
    Expand
  3. Apr 3, 2014
    4
    Pretty entertaining, but it's basically like Counterstrike for 60 bucks. I think the game lacks a lot of and the need for skill. After 30-60 minutes, you're sick of doing the same thing over and over again. If you are filthy rich, I'd recommend getting this game. It's fun for short little stints. For everyone else, save your money.
  4. Mar 19, 2014
    4
    My biggest purchasing regret in living memory. Don't be fooled by the hundreds of millions they spent on marketing, this the pinnacle of gaming mediocrity.
  5. Mar 11, 2014
    4
    played fps games for decades.. don't believe the over-hyped ads and reviews..
    "winner of over 75 awards" really.. before the game was even released..
    - next gen graphics? disappointingly not even close.. - mechs? go play Hawken on steam for FREE.. LOL - 50gb download.. (35gb required download of multi-language voice packs.. really?) - no server browser - no single player - the
    played fps games for decades.. don't believe the over-hyped ads and reviews..
    "winner of over 75 awards" really.. before the game was even released..

    - next gen graphics? disappointingly not even close..
    - mechs? go play Hawken on steam for FREE.. LOL
    - 50gb download.. (35gb required download of multi-language voice packs.. really?)
    - no server browser
    - no single player
    - the multi-player campaign mode with the voice-overs is.. a joke right?
    - definitely plays and feels like a modded COD game.. correction: a poorly optimized COD game..

    thank god i purchased from origin.com and was able to get my money back earlier today!

    going back to BF4.. waiting for naval strike expansion.. still the most entertaining multi-player fps today..

    hooah!
    Expand
  6. Mar 16, 2014
    4
    I really hoped that this game will be new Unreal Tournament. It has same fast movement with some parkour movement additions. The main problem is that you get really awfully low amount of content and weapons are CoD selection in sci-fi game. The weapons are just garbage, if you wana make CoD gunplay you can add some interesting weapons, but only one that is semi interesting is the smartI really hoped that this game will be new Unreal Tournament. It has same fast movement with some parkour movement additions. The main problem is that you get really awfully low amount of content and weapons are CoD selection in sci-fi game. The weapons are just garbage, if you wana make CoD gunplay you can add some interesting weapons, but only one that is semi interesting is the smart pistol. Only 3 Titans and no other vehicles is another joke. The story campaign is total trash, if they added single player mod with AI bots and more mods the game would be better. This game is huge let down and i bet EA will see a lot of fast refunds from players. The funny thing about this game is that Titanfall got less multiplayer content than for example Crysis 3, where Crysis 3 was primarily single player game and dont even compare these 2 games in terms of graphics. Expand
  7. Mar 17, 2014
    4
    Sadly, all the good game designers are quitting business, such as Valve who made Half-life, the folks that made Unreal Tournament and now the folks that made Bioshock. What you're left with is half-baked multiplayers such as Call of Duty with tons of lag and inaccurate shooting and now this. Game designers want to give you the smallest content they can for the money. Another example is theSadly, all the good game designers are quitting business, such as Valve who made Half-life, the folks that made Unreal Tournament and now the folks that made Bioshock. What you're left with is half-baked multiplayers such as Call of Duty with tons of lag and inaccurate shooting and now this. Game designers want to give you the smallest content they can for the money. Another example is the latest Resident Evil, Resident Evil 6, which was like one level of RE4. Save your money, rent this game and enjoy it for a few hours then buy it when it comes out in the bargain bin. Expand
  8. Mar 15, 2014
    4
    Once again I am baffled by the glowing critic reviews for this game. Admittedly I was having fun but after logging 8 hours into the game so far and unlocking everything there is to unlock and beating the campaign both Militia and IMC (hour and a half only) I am getting bored. Calling in a titan was AWESOME the first hundred times I did so, the next hundred times I've done so I findOnce again I am baffled by the glowing critic reviews for this game. Admittedly I was having fun but after logging 8 hours into the game so far and unlocking everything there is to unlock and beating the campaign both Militia and IMC (hour and a half only) I am getting bored. Calling in a titan was AWESOME the first hundred times I did so, the next hundred times I've done so I find myself yawning. There isn't a lot to keep me playing the game, sure it's pretty but it really does feel like Call of Titan Duty Fall.
    The campaign was just laughable, I have no idea what the actual story is or why these two groups are even fighting each other. The narrative was drowned out because I was busy trying to shoot people not listen to generic characters talk about...whatever the hell they were talking about. MacAllen I believe was a character? One I cannot put a face to. That's the only named character I can remember off the top of my head. Not only that but the hour and a half of campaign levels (both campaigns) are the same levels just playing them on different sides (boring). An issue I ran into was when I played through the militia campaign and then halfway through the IMC but stopped. Finding a matchmaking game for the mission I was on was dreadful. It took a crazy amount of time. On top of that when I did find a game it put me two mission back. So maybe I played through both campaigns in an hour without the backtracking.
    In conclusion the game does not offer a substantial amount of content for me to still be playing this even in a months time. After playing online for 8 hours and unlocking everything, what's the point now? The campaign is laughably horrid. Something I really wish I hadn't spent $60 on.
    Expand
  9. Mar 11, 2014
    4
    First of all let me state that Titanfall is mechanically and conceptually a brilliant and exhilirating game. It's responsive and fun to play, and adds a lot to the FPS genre from the perspective of game design, and for that all credit where it is due.

    The issue is that for a 60$ title the lack of content that comes upon release is unjustifiable. There are free to play shooters that give
    First of all let me state that Titanfall is mechanically and conceptually a brilliant and exhilirating game. It's responsive and fun to play, and adds a lot to the FPS genre from the perspective of game design, and for that all credit where it is due.

    The issue is that for a 60$ title the lack of content that comes upon release is unjustifiable. There are free to play shooters that give more content than Titanfall does, and this makes the price an instant refund for me, as while I enjoy the game immensely it is not worth the price and I do not want to encourage such prices on products that are not worth it from a content perspective.

    This took it from an 8 to a 6 for me, two other aspects about the game bothered me, the first and most important being the lack of something new from a game mode perspectve, and general generic design of said game modes and weapons (appart from attrition and the smart pistol) Respawn could have leapt forward but it feels like much of what they did was playing it safe.

    The last and less important point are the visuals, while they are of course not very important it shocks me that infinity wards most talented are incapable of working on anything else than an outdated and simplistic engine that is definately showing its age. Wether graphics are important or no after near a decade of use its time to put that old thing to rest, and use newer engines enabling more divergent and complex gameplay, as well as visual fidelity.
    Expand
  10. May 27, 2014
    4
    I think Titanfall is a lot of fun. However that doesn't mean I'll slap a green rating on this game. The $60 price tag is OUTRAGEOUS and that doesn't even factor in the extra cost of the "expedition" pack. Pfffft. Also the load times are atrocious. Click play "loading" click play campaign "loading" after teams fill "loading" oh wow I finally get to play now
  11. Mar 7, 2015
    4
    It's a game, it was kind of fun while it lasted. It's not anymore. But hey, at least it contains shooting and robots.... Thats really all their is too it though.
  12. Mar 13, 2014
    4
    CoD with mechs and parkour. Bad port from the Xbox version. Its hard to imagine how could you make such a poorly optimized PC game with the Source engine. I had to turn off vsync to play "properly".

    The game is fun but after 4 hours (+14 from beta) I realised I saw all the content the game could offer. Same quality as the beta, with just some more stuff. I got my Great Game
    CoD with mechs and parkour. Bad port from the Xbox version. Its hard to imagine how could you make such a poorly optimized PC game with the Source engine. I had to turn off vsync to play "properly".

    The game is fun but after 4 hours (+14 from beta) I realised I saw all the content the game could offer.

    Same quality as the beta, with just some more stuff. I got my Great Game Guarantee refund on Origin.
    Expand
  13. Mar 19, 2014
    4
    игра........ тот же геймплей что Šø в калГе, поставил 4 Ń‚Š¾Š»ŃŒŠŗŠ¾ за Š½Š¾Š²ŃƒŃŽ заГумку ,,титаны,,.Š•ŃŃ‚ŃŒ оГин ŠæŠ»ŃŽŃ...Динамика игра Š¾Ń‡ŠµŠ½ŃŒ Гинамична,можно высоко ŠæŃ€Ń‹Š³Š°Ń‚ŃŒ, Šø можно не Š±ŠµŃŠæŠ¾ŠŗŠ¾ŠøŃ‚ŃŒŃŃ по повоГу сёГл можно просто ŠøŃ… обойти или Š·Š°ŠæŃ€Ń‹Š³Š½ŃƒŃ‚ŃŒ на зГание.игра........ тот же геймплей что Šø в калГе, поставил 4 Ń‚Š¾Š»ŃŒŠŗŠ¾ за Š½Š¾Š²ŃƒŃŽ заГумку ,,титаны,,.Š•ŃŃ‚ŃŒ оГин ŠæŠ»ŃŽŃ...Динамика игра Š¾Ń‡ŠµŠ½ŃŒ Гинамична,можно высоко ŠæŃ€Ń‹Š³Š°Ń‚ŃŒ, Šø можно не Š±ŠµŃŠæŠ¾ŠŗŠ¾ŠøŃ‚ŃŒŃŃ по повоГу сёГл можно просто ŠøŃ… обойти или Š·Š°ŠæŃ€Ń‹Š³Š½ŃƒŃ‚ŃŒ на зГание.
  14. Mar 11, 2014
    4
    Now before you decide to just look away from this review based on the score, I'll let you know that I'm being fair in weighing everything up. At first Titanfall looked like a great game and I couldn't wait to see what they would add to it. And that's the thing. They didn't. Now I'm not going to say that anyone who likes this game is 'a Microsoft fanboy' because you could just fire aNow before you decide to just look away from this review based on the score, I'll let you know that I'm being fair in weighing everything up. At first Titanfall looked like a great game and I couldn't wait to see what they would add to it. And that's the thing. They didn't. Now I'm not going to say that anyone who likes this game is 'a Microsoft fanboy' because you could just fire a 'fanboy' post right back at me. Fair dues to people who like this game. However I bet that those people like the Call of Duty franchise. Again, fair dues to you if you do, I'm not going to criticise you on that. However, I'm talking from the point of view of a Battlefield and open world loving gamer. For me, this game didn't add anything I hadn't seen before. I get more satisfaction out of blowing stuff up in Battlefield with massive 64 player teams than I do wandering around in a mech killing what were mainly AI with 6v6 teams. And this is one of the main reasons for this rating. After playing games like Battlefield, by comparison these maps feel cramped, the combat feels archaic and while the graphics aren't an eye sore they just don't have that step up above the rest that I for one have come to expect from games with this much hype. I can see people disagreeing with me and saying 'well the graphics don't matter, only the gameplay' and usually I would agree with you. I loved Prototype and at the time that it was released the graphics were nearing the quality of the last generation of consoles. The same goes for Star Wars Battlefront and so on. But I didn't care because the gameplay was just so good and for me that made the game. But with Titanfall I often found myself aiming at the floor because the recoil that I have come to expect from other first person shooter games just wasn't there. And believe me, when there's a crowd of four plus people in front of you and you're standing there shooting the concrete, it can get a little frustrating. But even with all of this mediocrity the game would have usually scored around a 5 or a 6 or even 7 (with a push) with me for being an average shooter with few new mechanics. But I digress, the main reason why this game scored so low is because of the disease that seems to be plaguing many decent games recently. I am of course talking about the dreaded 'Always Online Connection' or 'Always Connected DRM'. This means that if you lose connection to the internet, this wonderful new shooter you just bought... well... you can't play it I'm afraid. If this was the case with a studio such as Crytek or Activision I would say "sure, let's give it a chance!". But it's not. It's with EA. The studio that turned SimCity from my game of the year to that large pile of dust in the corner. I experienced first hand this always online, and there's no other way to put it, catastrophe and let me tell you that I thought EA had learned after this and would put the always online feature to bed. But no, they obviously haven't learned at all and that is why it has scored so low. My advice for this year is to get whatever console you want, they're both great consoles, but be aware that The Order 1886 and The Last of Us, two games I cannot wait to play, are both only on PS4 and that is what I shall be getting. Expand
  15. Mar 11, 2014
    4
    COD with Mehc's that feel like nothing more than large humans. The A.I running around is the most boring unchallenging thing I have ever experienced, and most the time you end up killing 5-10 A.I for each and every person you run into. What a let down.
    Really hope they do a better job of Titanfall 2. This game had sooooo much potential.
  16. Mar 11, 2014
    4
    Minimal storyline, no single player campaign, "full" game (or "expansions", depending on whether or not you're an apologist) is $80 if you buy it up front, $85 if you buy the "season pass" (what seasons have to do with anything is beyond me), and probably $90 if you buy each of the 3 slated "map packs." The multiplayer mode has only 12 players, six per team, at least in "campaign" mode.Minimal storyline, no single player campaign, "full" game (or "expansions", depending on whether or not you're an apologist) is $80 if you buy it up front, $85 if you buy the "season pass" (what seasons have to do with anything is beyond me), and probably $90 if you buy each of the 3 slated "map packs." The multiplayer mode has only 12 players, six per team, at least in "campaign" mode. The inclusion of a bunch of bots attempt to make it feel larger. Another game that doesn't come close to living up to its hype. Expand
  17. Mar 16, 2014
    4
    First the good things: The pace of the game is nice, unlocks happen daily if you play a couple of hours a day, the games are not too long, usually around 15-20 minutes. and the controls are really good, there is a nice feel to piloting a titan or, moving in various way through the infrastructure of the maps, and the soundscape is rather well done too... Sadly, that is where the good thingsFirst the good things: The pace of the game is nice, unlocks happen daily if you play a couple of hours a day, the games are not too long, usually around 15-20 minutes. and the controls are really good, there is a nice feel to piloting a titan or, moving in various way through the infrastructure of the maps, and the soundscape is rather well done too... Sadly, that is where the good things end.

    The bad things:
    -Matchmaking is simply terrible, trying to unlock 2 of the titans(you absolutely have to complete both IMC and militia campaigns to get both) is an absolute pain in the ass. Not only are the teams missmatched most of the time(average level of the opposing team being 15-20 levels higher is not uncommon) But due to people not wanting to play the campaign more than the bare minimum, you are forced to back track ALOT!, joining lobbies that take you back 2,3,4 sometimes 5 maps, just to advance 1 map later on. And the lack of possiblity to do said campaign solo, is just adding salt to the wounds.

    -The Graphics, are just fugly, and if you try to improve them on an older generation graphics card, say, a GTX 285, GTX 480 or GTX 580. You run a risk of making 99% of the textures disappear, by turning on the AA.

    -Ridiculous hit detection; Getting shot through walls with a projectile that does not pierce said surface, or getting jumpkicked when the person doing said kick is 2-3 meters away or through a wall, is common.

    -Limited selection of maps, and the map design is usually skewed in a way, that the first team to field 2-3 titans, will most likely dominate through the rest of the match. Also the maps are usually designed in a way that gives the other team a significant advantage, for example one of the maps is located in an area you could consider a "dragon graveyard" or their grotto, the other side, allways begins with the high ground advantage, while the other need to go uphill most of the time. Not a fun thing, when sides are chosen randomly in this game, and if you get thrown on one side multiple times in a row.

    -They nerfed the wrong things: The nuclear ejection has become a laughable thing. The radius of said blast, is now a titans fart, one dash, is all it takes to get out of the radius. While on the other hand, Smart pistol did not suffer a nerf. Does not look like we can assume respawn will make good choices in the future either.

    -The burnercard system, is not a situational as you think, You just have to experience it yourself. It is awfull.

    -The game encourages people to roam the opposing teams spawns, and there is no spawn protection, the moment your feet touch ground(you respawn) you are free game.

    -The customization options for weapons and titans, are rather humble. considering the price of the game, and how small repertuar of maps you have, you would think they would have more of something.... Oh wait, over 30 gigs of the game is soundfiles(closer to 40 gigs actually).

    -The game unlocks, even though they happen at a steady pace, are not necesarily what you were gunning for, and it is somewhat gimicky, for example, trying to get the 20 titans killed with the 40mm cannon, sounds simple enough, but when you realize, you have to destroy them, BEFORE they blow up after getting doomed, that task became so much more complicated, and seeing as how everyone is equipping nuclear ejection, well, good luck.

    In overall, the idea of the game is awesome, but execution is poor at best, and it does not cash in on the promises it made with the beta, if anything, beta was just there to get people open up their wallets.

    4/10, for a game that fails to deliver what it promised.
    Expand
  18. Mar 21, 2014
    4
    A lot of other people here are raising the same points I'd like too, but in much more cogent ways, so I'm going to address the WAIT TIME between matches.

    In a three hour period (180 minutes) in which I kept track: 112 Minutes were spent playing (Which is merely fun-ish. By the way, the parkour isn't that useful- it requires your complete focus, and I always scored better when I just
    A lot of other people here are raising the same points I'd like too, but in much more cogent ways, so I'm going to address the WAIT TIME between matches.

    In a three hour period (180 minutes) in which I kept track:

    112 Minutes were spent playing (Which is merely fun-ish. By the way, the parkour isn't that useful- it requires your complete focus, and I always scored better when I just played like a normal FPS and mostly ignored the parkour aspects)

    68 Minutes were spent WAITING to play. Over one hour of my time, that day, was spent WAITING. First, you WAIT for enough players, then you WAIT through a voice over explaining the mission, and then you WAIT (yes, even more waiting) through 30 second or so cut scenes that you watch over and over and over again. They stop being cool the third time you play the same map.

    I could go on about the massive size (50GB), the ridiculous price point ($60-$80 USD), the poor optimization (34GB of uncompressed audio files, for example), the low quality graphics (10 year old engine), but as I said you can read a dozen of those here already.

    If you want this game, make sure your OK with it WASTING so much of your TIME.
    Expand
  19. Apr 8, 2014
    4
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Titanfail is 100% goat sh....

    - Price ---> fail
    - Longevity ----> fail
    - EA ----> fail
    - Gameplay fail
    - COD with mech
    - VERY BAD porting for pc
    - This is pathetic dogelephant sh...
    Expand
  20. Jun 19, 2014
    4
    UPDATE ! Matchmaking destroyed this game for me and my friends who were playing tis game from beggining. No idea why Respawn didnt implement dedicated community servers like CS and any other succesfull MULTIPLAYER fps have done in the past (ofcourse they said they will...and atm we got some kind of broken beta and private matches. Right Now it takes 15 minutes to conect to any expeditionUPDATE ! Matchmaking destroyed this game for me and my friends who were playing tis game from beggining. No idea why Respawn didnt implement dedicated community servers like CS and any other succesfull MULTIPLAYER fps have done in the past (ofcourse they said they will...and atm we got some kind of broken beta and private matches. Right Now it takes 15 minutes to conect to any expedition mode, and from vanilla maps only hardpoint and attrition are still in game tbh.
    Couple months after release and they take away 2 classic modes like CTF and Pilot Hunt (basicly team deathmatch) from game ?

    Something is seriously wrong with this game atm. Its still "fun", but its just PUG vs PUG all the time... and where are 2 more xpacs almost 6 months after release ? No one will be left to play them if nothing changes. Just copy Counter Strike community server's and this game will be afloat till titanfall 2 ...
    Expand
  21. Nov 4, 2014
    4
    The graphics are nice and the gameplay is awesome, but the cheating in this game is killing the game. I think towards when I quit they were just installing some sort of anti cheat, or activating, but regardless I had grown tired of it by that time, along with how the campaign ruins it as well. The best way to avoid cheaters was to play campaign, but the downside of that is sometimes teamsThe graphics are nice and the gameplay is awesome, but the cheating in this game is killing the game. I think towards when I quit they were just installing some sort of anti cheat, or activating, but regardless I had grown tired of it by that time, along with how the campaign ruins it as well. The best way to avoid cheaters was to play campaign, but the downside of that is sometimes teams get so stacked because of people in a party together that you can't really enjoy the game(this more so when you're new). Once I had gotten the hang of the game and met people that played on the same level as myself, we pretty much ran through anybody we played. In one of the updates on the game they did it so if you lose two matches in a row, it finds you new opponents. That's fine, but here's the other part that's killing the game. Say you just played map 5, and you beat the other team two matches in a row, or they beat you. The game then attempts to find new appoints on map 5, if not then it'll backtrack to map 4(previous map you played). Then if that doesn't work it'll start you all over back on map 1 and you'll likely run into the same people that you got separated with. So if you're trying to complete campaign or story mode or whatever it is, it makes it virtually impossible so it takes you forever to unlock the other two titans. I didn't have this problem but I noticed it in one of the updates and I've even tried to tell them this but it's been disregarded. I regret spending the money, and I wouldn't recommend anybody else buying this game, not until they actually get some people to fix the problems of the game, and that's if it's not too late by now. Expand
  22. Oct 17, 2014
    4
    It's COD with mechs. And buggy as well (PC) But, it looks kinda good, nothing impressive. Though it's way overhyped. If you like online fps multiplayer games like COD, than you'll love the repetitiveness of Titanfall..
  23. Jan 6, 2015
    4
    Not exactly the blockbuster I expected, but.... it's OK.
    Certainly looks quite nice.
    Really too expensive though, for what it is.
    Would really have liked a single player option too. So that sucked.
  24. Mar 11, 2014
    3
    The game is overhyped and overpriced and does not deserve anything beyond a 7.0 score. First of all there is no single player it has only a multiplayer mode, second the graphics are a joke they are average to poor with a lot of low quality textures the game feels like a 2004 generation game, third it gets repetitive and boring really fast the gameplay is so freaking shallow it is only runThe game is overhyped and overpriced and does not deserve anything beyond a 7.0 score. First of all there is no single player it has only a multiplayer mode, second the graphics are a joke they are average to poor with a lot of low quality textures the game feels like a 2004 generation game, third it gets repetitive and boring really fast the gameplay is so freaking shallow it is only run and shoot all the time. I do not believe that this piece of crap costs 60 dollars Expand
  25. Aug 27, 2014
    3
    Bloody hell 50gig install for old school fps (and not in a good old schooly way either). Horrible textures, poor lighting. Reasonably fun gameplay (if only for a short time as it gets old fast). Seriously loooooong load times for what looks like a bad xbox game, did I mention 50gigs?
  26. Sep 14, 2014
    3
    No real campaign, couldn't care less about the potential cool world you're shooting stuff up in. Gets repetitive real fast and the servers are already dieing.
  27. Mar 15, 2014
    3
    This game is 50GB. 35GB of that is audio. The developers haven't figured out how to compress audio files and they're trying to sell a $60 game. Hold off on buying this game until the development team learns how to use Audacity.
  28. Mar 15, 2014
    3
    This game is basically like any other shooter out there but with parkour added to it; which is pretty cool. However, there are loads of hackers that destroy you every time you try to go into a match. You also get paired up with people that are X4 you level, have tons of experience, have all the guns and mods unlocked... It just isn't fair. When I leave a match after getting stomped byThis game is basically like any other shooter out there but with parkour added to it; which is pretty cool. However, there are loads of hackers that destroy you every time you try to go into a match. You also get paired up with people that are X4 you level, have tons of experience, have all the guns and mods unlocked... It just isn't fair. When I leave a match after getting stomped by these people, I get put right back into the same match as them! Matchmaking also takes way to long for some reason, and it never pairs you up with anyone fare. On top of that, the teams never scramble... meaning that the same people that you are first paired up with will be who you are stuck with - if you get a stacked team you keep it until people get bored and leave. You can only play 6x6 and nothing else.... there is NO single-player campaign at all. I always hated that about these types of games... that the single-player campaign is only a few hours long... well, this game doesn't even have one; it is just multiplayer matchups with some guy talking for 30 seconds - that's it. What really pushed me to write this review however, are the hackers. They are ridiculous and unavoidable. There is one in almost EVERY match! How can I play a game and enjoy it when I keep getting killed every two seconds by someone who can see me through walls or ALWAYS kills me with a headshot in one hit? When someone goes 20 / 0 in this game you know something is up.... Expand
  29. Jul 9, 2014
    3
    No SLI support still. Maybe never. 3D Vision cross-hairs and convergence when scoping in is all wrong. Stuttering frame-rate problems for many and 60fps lock even if using 120+ Hz monitor. Jumping through windows is frustrating as hell. No real performance gain even when running with all details set to low and reduced FOV (which I have to do since no SLI). Map packs have divided theNo SLI support still. Maybe never. 3D Vision cross-hairs and convergence when scoping in is all wrong. Stuttering frame-rate problems for many and 60fps lock even if using 120+ Hz monitor. Jumping through windows is frustrating as hell. No real performance gain even when running with all details set to low and reduced FOV (which I have to do since no SLI). Map packs have divided the already dwindling community. You can never get a game in Expedition Variety pack. Matchmaking is horribly derped.

    Smart pistol makes any retard pilot jumping around able to pick you off from a backward flipping somersault - should be removed.

    The E3 hype was about potential. The 'critics' quickly play-tested the game on hot PCs after initial release when the new users were still playing.

    There is no single-player campaign and there should have been. Especially for the $60 price + $25 expansion maps (only available to those who shelled out the extra $$).

    Go play COD 2.
    Expand
  30. Apr 26, 2014
    3
    To sum up Titanfall is simple. Over hyped. This is over rated by almost all of the major reviewers out there. I believe that once trusted sites such as Gamespot, IGN and others are losing their integrity by giving this game more than it justly deserves. A good 6.0 out of 10. Nothing wrong with the game, but certainly a far fry from revolutionary or re-inventive etc.

    The graphics are not
    To sum up Titanfall is simple. Over hyped. This is over rated by almost all of the major reviewers out there. I believe that once trusted sites such as Gamespot, IGN and others are losing their integrity by giving this game more than it justly deserves. A good 6.0 out of 10. Nothing wrong with the game, but certainly a far fry from revolutionary or re-inventive etc.

    The graphics are not even last gen, they are 2004/05 at best. The gameplay feels clunky and the so called campaign is a joke. The AI is the worst I have experienced in many years. The only redeeming qualities of this game is the actual Titan concept. This has clearly been a copy and paste job like a sandwich with multiple spreads ripping ideas from Battlefield 2142 and shoving them into a Call of Duty universe / gameplay style. I can only give it a 3.00. Mainstream reviewers should be ashamed of themselves for praising this farce.
    Expand
Metascore
86

Generally favorable reviews - based on 29 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 28 out of 29
  2. Negative: 0 out of 29
  1. CD-Action
    Jun 28, 2014
    90
    I was waiting for a game that would blow me away and break the oligopoly of Battlefield and Call of Duty. Here it is. Titanfall shows that online shooting does not have to be confined to contemporary battlegrounds. [05/2014, p.42]
  2. May 14, 2014
    80
    In the mind-boggling question that tortures world's biggest gaming studios (how to refresh the competitive FPS genreĀ), Respawn answers by taking the Call of Duty core, enhancing it with elements from various sources and franchises (Mech games, Crysis , Tribes, Mirror's Edge etc.) and forging it in the Old School mold (Quake/Unreal Tournament) . Titanfall does not innovate. It manages, however, to leave a fresh taste by balancing nicely all components of its gameplay.
  3. Pelit (Finland)
    May 11, 2014
    85
    Titanfall is a highly entertaining online shooter, but it's a bit light on content for a full priced game. You quickly start to realize that Titanfall could desperately use more maps, more unlockables, more upgrades and more customization. [Apr 2014]