Starcraft II: Legacy of the Void

 PC
User Score
8.3

Generally favorable reviews- based on 1197 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 961 out of 1197
  2. Mixed: 113 out of 1197
  3. Negative: 123 out of 1197
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. Fran_cisco
    Nov 21, 2015
    3
    TL&DR: If you loved the story and lore from the original Starcraft, you're gonna hate this game.

    The good: Excellent gameplay, very fun to play. The bad: Awful story ruins the lore, it's pretty much a ripoff of Warcraft 3 and mass effect. Poor writing Cringe worthy dialogs Unbalanced multiplayer preceded by months of lies by the development team that in the end didn't change    TL&DR: If you loved the story and lore from the original Starcraft, you're gonna hate this game.

    The good:
    Excellent gameplay, very fun to play.

    The bad:
    Awful story ruins the lore, it's pretty much a ripoff of Warcraft 3 and mass effect.
    Poor writing
    Cringe worthy dialogs

    Unbalanced multiplayer preceded by months of lies by the development team that in the end didn't change anything to core design flaws.    … Expand
  2. sabiusman
    Nov 27, 2015
    4
    As a Strategy game, Legacy is absolutely breathtaking. I love every aspect of it.

    But I didn't come to Starcraft 2 for the game, I came for the plot, and oh boy is this an absolutely hideous end to one of my most beloved games.

    I am pretty sure that you agree with me if you loved the first Starcraft's plot, and you don't if you didn't so there's not much else to say.
  3. TheRager
    Nov 14, 2015
    4
    Starcraft and SC Brood War are two of my favorite games ever. I waited 12 years for Wings of Liberty and although it was more of a Hollywoodish +12 rated sci-fi action movie than the dark sci-fi thriller what I expected I really enjoyed it and give it a 9/10 in my book. The Heart of the Swarm was also a great game in 2013, but it had a lot more flaws than its prequel: very easy and simpleStarcraft and SC Brood War are two of my favorite games ever. I waited 12 years for Wings of Liberty and although it was more of a Hollywoodish +12 rated sci-fi action movie than the dark sci-fi thriller what I expected I really enjoyed it and give it a 9/10 in my book. The Heart of the Swarm was also a great game in 2013, but it had a lot more flaws than its prequel: very easy and simple missions, an even more simple "good vs. evil" story, a totally unbearable main character (SC1 Kerrigan is the best female video game character ever, but this "new" incarnation of her is just simple super boring and sexist) - so let's say that HotS was a decent 8/10. The multiplayer was great in both games although the minor balance flaws. So I was really looking forward for Legacy of the Void... but as you can see my given score it's didn't really met with my not even so high expectations.

    - The story: the weakest part of the whole game, 1/10 at most. In the beginning I was "oh man it's like 300 in the space, dumb but at least enjoyable". In the end then "OMFG this s*it is like Twilight in the space" (yes and I hate Twilight by heart). The protoss characters are 1 dimensional idiots (beside Alarak - that guy was really great), Amon is a really lame antagonist, there are no emotions, no explanations, the Xel'nagas are copied from Mass Effect 3 Leviathan, and the f*cking romance subplot between Raynor and Kerrigan is so dumb that I can't even tell you and the ending is... I literally cried in pain. As I said above, without Alarak this would be a well deserved 0/10.

    - The sounds: although most of the voiceovers are generally good, the protoss characters has near to no special in their voices. The others are... good as ever but nothing special. Luckily for Blizzard the music is great and catchy so they got a 9/10 here.

    - The graphics: the gameplay graphics is generally okay as always, but really too cartoony. I was positively disappointed though in the cutscenes made with the game engine - those are really nice but still, not something really smashing. The CGI videos are great as ever. Here goes a 8/10 for this.

    - Singleplayer gameplay: a huge step backwards again, reminds of the SC1 "Destroy all enemy" type objectives with the base building and "A" mashing. The difficulty is a basically a joke beside the epilogue mission 2, it was pretty tough in brutal. The new units and the Spear of Adun are interesting at first but no big deal here either. The campaign gameplay wasn't boring just really mediocre afterall - so here's the well deserved 6/10 for it.

    - Multiplayer gameplay: surprisingly good! I've seen this kind of coop gameplay here and there before but it's really enjoyable. The 6 six new units are varied between terrible and great: Cyclone is a joke, Liberator is interesting, Adepts are pretty annoying but also cool, Ravager is really forgettable, just like the Disruptor but Lukers are AMAZING - as a Brood War veteran zerg player I really like to use them again! All other balance changes are generally okay and the sped up gameplay is strange at first but ultimately it's not that bad. Summarizing all this I give multi 9/10.

    Verdict: this game is okay, but really mediocre if I want to be honest. The biggest problem is that this is not really "Starcrafty" anymore - ofc it has everything but this is still a mess without a real soul. For this my heart is bleeding but I have to give it 6/10... wait... this dumb garbage cost me 35 €!!!! For this overpriced DLC I could have bought 2 or 3 better games!!!! Let's lower its score to 4/10 and now my soul in peace again. Au revoir.    … Expand
  4. theirrelephants
    Mar 7, 2016
    1
    "This isn't even my final form." - Sarah Kerrigan.

    Someone needs to put a bullet into whoever wrote this steaming pile of a garbage, and then empty the rest of the CLIP into whoever thought it was okay to charge separately for each campaign.

    1/10 because making me pay extra for each campaign is some EA tier judaism.
  5. mrklingon
    Nov 29, 2015
    1
    Nothing I can really add that hasn't been said.

    The dialogue and storyboard in general is just really dumb. It doesn't have the sophistication and good storytelling SC1 did. The people that took over the story in SC2 were just plain stupid people or they were pandering to a very young audience. Playing through the missions themselves as "OK" at best. I never really finished a mission    Nothing I can really add that hasn't been said.

    The dialogue and storyboard in general is just really dumb. It doesn't have the sophistication and good storytelling SC1 did. The people that took over the story in SC2 were just plain stupid people or they were pandering to a very young audience.

    Playing through the missions themselves as "OK" at best. I never really finished a mission and wanted to play it again. With the horrible story and mediocre gameplay, I found the campaign to really drag on in the last few missions and I was ready for it to end. I had to put the difficulty on "hard" to get a modicum of a challenge out of most missions without it just being artificially difficult and I'm by no means an SC pro. The missions are very linear and you generally had to complete the mission in the way that was laid out for you.

    All in all very disappointing and I feel Blizz has done to SC what they did to Diablo and of course Warcraft.
    Blizzard is definitely not what they used to be.    … Expand
  6. atr577
    Nov 17, 2015
    1
    Starcraft is awesome, but this final part looked bad to me for its plot. If felt like elves in space, lots of magic and things left just unexplained. In the beginning, SC was way more materialistic and real game, where weapons were guns and aliens were bloody beasts trying to rip your gut.

    Now we fight with energies and spirit, we have "the Void" without explaining what that is, units    Starcraft is awesome, but this final part looked bad to me for its plot. If felt like elves in space, lots of magic and things left just unexplained. In the beginning, SC was way more materialistic and real game, where weapons were guns and aliens were bloody beasts trying to rip your gut.

    Now we fight with energies and spirit, we have "the Void" without explaining what that is, units are made of the same void, Kerrigan turns into an ancient alien but keeps her image, the zerg are really just misunderstood and have a big heart for everyone. Soap opera very much.

    And everybody living in peace in the end - it makes the story look like a fairy tale still more.    … Expand
  7. edawg
    Jul 20, 2017
    0
    its just not fun. the matchmaking is horrible. you either easily win or you lose 10 games straight. poorly done and not fun at all.
    also the story is weak, graphics are dated, load times are long, and matchmaking takes 5-10min to find a 3v3.
  8. NostalgiaGamer
    Nov 20, 2015
    0
    I paid $40 for this? The plot is unsophisticated and predictable, following recent trends in science fiction. The alien characters are very cliche and are not believable to the slightest degree. Even the main protagonist made me cringe and skip every time he spoke in his forced, melodramatic way.The gameplay just amounts to a giant re-skin of Wings of Liberty units minus all theI paid $40 for this? The plot is unsophisticated and predictable, following recent trends in science fiction. The alien characters are very cliche and are not believable to the slightest degree. Even the main protagonist made me cringe and skip every time he spoke in his forced, melodramatic way.The gameplay just amounts to a giant re-skin of Wings of Liberty units minus all the exploration, story branches, and lovable characters in the first installment of the Starcraft 2 saga. What a let down. If I could have at least explored the inside of the Protoss vessel and see all the great feats of "culture and engineering" that the characters alluded to, I might have actually enjoyed the game.… Expand
  9. Vasault
    Nov 21, 2015
    2
    what a horrible way to end up a fantastic saga, this is the worst ending of a saga ever, no need to tell you why, finish the game, if you've been playing since 99 you're gonna cry of sadness, if you're a casual scum or a blizzard fanboy, you'll probably give this game a 10/10, because there is absolutely no reason to give a good score to this massive fail, what a bad ending, seriously SOwhat a horrible way to end up a fantastic saga, this is the worst ending of a saga ever, no need to tell you why, finish the game, if you've been playing since 99 you're gonna cry of sadness, if you're a casual scum or a blizzard fanboy, you'll probably give this game a 10/10, because there is absolutely no reason to give a good score to this massive fail, what a bad ending, seriously SO BAD, is like watching a disney movie… Expand
  10. eXiledrts
    Jan 2, 2016
    4
    I want to start this review by saying I am a huge fan on Starcraft. I played Wings of Liberty and Heart of the Swarm daily, and was high diamond throughout those expansions. I am now diamond on Legacy of the Void, and I have encountered so many problems that blizzard has yet to address in ladder.

    Singleplayer and Co-op: Once again, blizzard delivered a work of art for campaign. It's    I want to start this review by saying I am a huge fan on Starcraft. I played Wings of Liberty and Heart of the Swarm daily, and was high diamond throughout those expansions. I am now diamond on Legacy of the Void, and I have encountered so many problems that blizzard has yet to address in ladder.

    Singleplayer and Co-op:
    Once again, blizzard delivered a work of art for campaign. It's Co-Op missions promote online play, however attract a different kind of people than those who grind competitive matches. The singleplayer and Co-Op, as well as arcade, deserve an 7/10

    Multiplayer:

    Being a player of all 3 races I can weight in about every match up. To be quite frank, a game's beta is supposed to be the time to balance units and promote fun gameplay; Legacy of the Void Multiplayer feels like it is still in beta.

    Zerg, a slimy race once based around the idea of overwhelming opponents with lots of cheap fast units, is incredible overpowered compared to the other 2 races. Playing zerg at a high level is barely fun anymore, as you end up defeating opponents who are clearly more skilled than you. The macro changes made from wol/hots -> lotv were an accidental buff to the race. Over 60% of players above platinum play Zerg, and the average Zerg win rate is 56% (as opposed to the 48-52 percent for all races in previous expansions).

    Blizzard was many of times credited on being masters of balance, promoting skilled play. They failed horrible in LoTV.

    Another problem with the game is that blizzard is attempting a new matchmaking system to reduce times in queue. This however, has lead to common "mismatches", where players as low as platinum play grandmasters (top 200 players in the region) often. This complete failure of a matchmaking adjustment takes almost all enjoyment out of many ladder games.

    Unranked play, however, is a lot more fun. Since there is no pressure of losing ladder points or mmr, unranked play has a calming tone to it. However, it should be noted that unranked players are often matched against players playing ranked. This is another problem with the multiplayer, as generally people who play unranked are trying wacky strategies or trying a different race. This leads to further mismatching.

    There are many other balancing problems regarding 1 base Protoss and Terran play in almost all match up, most of it revolving around the adept, liberator and siege tank, overall, the current LoTV mutiplayer is not in a playable state, does not promote fun play and does not help skilled players in races other than zerg be regularly successful. I give the multiplayer experience in Legacy a 2/10, and that is being generous.

    Although annoying at times, the new chat and visual overhaul that hit servers right before the release of LoTV is a large improvement of that found in Wings of Liberty and Heart of the Swarm.

    Replays are something that is mainly unique to Starcraft, and remains with the new expansion    … Expand
  11. Kelembribor21
    Jan 11, 2016
    4
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Game has great gameplay , some interesting new units , though i have feeling the developers got lazy after Heart of the Swarm there is lot of reused art and units from part 1 and 2 of trilogy but the thing that is worst is horrible story that destroys all the legacy of original Starcraft so they can i guess make intro for World of Starcraft and cash in ...… Expand
  12. HikariWS
    Apr 10, 2016
    3
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I was a big fun of SC and played it for years. I was expecting SC2 to be the same. Not the same game with updated graph engine, but a fun game that would last at least the same 10 years.

    The first episode was fun on the campain side, but was frustrating for MP. Protoss was nerfed by losing goon while Zerg and specially Terra were buffed with stronger units.

    I expected the second episode to fix that, but it just made things worse. Protoss was limited to the "Death Ball" strat, while zerg was buffed even more.

    At this point I don't care anymore, I just wanted to watch the last episode and put SC2 down. I was frustrated that we barely had Protoss in CGs for 2 episodes and expected to have it fixed in last, and have all characters unitied led by Protoss.

    What LotV brought was even greater frustration. Story went into new and unexpressive characters and left Raynor and Sara away. There was no explanation at all on the consequences of Amon not being able to control the Zerg or a Sara x Amon fight for that control. On the ontrary, Amon was able to control the whole Protoss!!

    It looked like story writers lost their imagination for the last episode, or maybe they just left to another company and new ones were unable to hold?

    For multiplayer I didn't even bother, I'm not wasting my time playing this game anymore. I give 2 score points for the intro video, the only good thing in this game.    … Expand
  13. Henry0012
    Feb 7, 2016
    0
    The story was very cliche, but the campaign missions were pretty fun if you just ignore the story. However, my main complain is about MP balance and gameplay since Starcraft is a competitive RTS. Legacy of the Void pretty much killed Starcraft 2 for me. As a Terran player, this game is no longer fun to play. It's rather frustrating and stressful to be honest as a master league. The wholeThe story was very cliche, but the campaign missions were pretty fun if you just ignore the story. However, my main complain is about MP balance and gameplay since Starcraft is a competitive RTS. Legacy of the Void pretty much killed Starcraft 2 for me. As a Terran player, this game is no longer fun to play. It's rather frustrating and stressful to be honest as a master league. The whole expansion pretty much nerf Terran from economic changes and unit designs. I won't get much into balance specifics, but it honestly feel like an uphill battle from the start. And once it gets to the late game like when the 8 armored ultralisk came out, it's pretty much over. Terran used to have mid-early game advantage to secure a competitive late game, but that's hardly the case now. I think many of the pros share the same feeling and many legendary Terran players have retired since Legacy of the Void came out. Other pro players like Polt seems to share the same frustration.

    Balance aside, the worst part is that the development team took forever to make changes. The obviously broken Protoss adept, it took them over 2 months after release a slight nerf to it. They had the whole beta to themselves, and I just don't see how they release such a broken game. Hots was patched very quick like the overpowered hell bat drops. At this rate, I feel like many Terran players will just move on and put SC2 to rest.

    I would honestly save your money if you're Terran players. Even if my argument is invalid, it's just not fun to play Terran anymore. It's going to require not only a simple balance change to the units, but also a fundamental changes how Terran work to make it more interesting in which I highly doubt it will happen. I can't even play mech anymore, and massing MMM for the last 5 years can get very old quick.

    If you're casual players, the coop missions are free and I think they are better than the paid campaign.    … Expand
  14. Lordgrey
    Dec 2, 2015
    3
    Boring...very-very-very boring part. Two first chapters of starcraft 2 trilogy have ultimately more atmospheric and interesting campaign. Game is a lemon, I want my money back./
  15. biednyrobbo
    Nov 12, 2015
    3
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Spoiler Alert:

    Plot: Biggest disappointment, Every second word in LOTS is about honour, glory, tradition, unification and other noble sparkles. Every third is void, misery, pain and bla bla bla. Lots of talk, no information at all. Why Amon wanted to destroy the world? What are his motives? Amon become Xel Naga like Kerrigan years ago, and now consider him as a antagonist because Blizzard says so? Whole Amon story is so weak, without good background, plot is flat as my exgirl chest.

    Gameplay. Repeatable. Single is single-use. Missions are forcing you to use one, fixed by developers strategy, mostly well know from HOTS and WOL. Multi - few new units, but ball of death strategy stays on, and that can get bored...

    And more from me. Its outrageous that blizzard games graphics are so similar. You can take xel naga power infused kerrigan and put her into diablo III. Explosions, rays and whole models in my opinion are repetitious. Even gameplay between starcraft and warcraft III is almost identical. Switch Iron claws to zealot psi blades. So big studio, and only one guy is developing graphic style?...
    Female Protoss.... Protoss with breast and bras... Well, when I was playing first starcraft I though that protoss are so telekinetic and so psionic that they dont breed like horses. How stupid I was... Only differences between terrans and protoss are again noble sparkles...

    In summary I am 28 years old big fan of Starcraft 1, maybe because, in my opinion, it was made by people to people, not by managers, market strategists, public relations specialists. I am no longer a marketing target to blizzard...    … Expand
  16. CriErr
    Nov 13, 2015
    4
    Most of dialogues is filler, those which is not - full of exposition written for 8yo. As end for Epic Space Saga Trilogy this game is complete failure. All other people who review this as 10/10 campaign great, just cant make a step behind their f2 A Click gameplay and actually listen dialogues and how bad those written.
    Multiplayer features are great, but campaign ruined game for me.
  17. Hannibaal
    Aug 3, 2018
    0
    Legacy of the Void es la culminación de la trilogía que compone SC2, como tal mantiene los principales defectos de este fraudulento RTS. La historia culmina el disparate que comenzó con Wings of Liberty, yo en Lotv no sabía que pasaba, al final de la misma Kerrigan se convierte en un dios o algo así, un disparate, nada tiene sentido en esta basura de historia que se caga en lo que fuéLegacy of the Void es la culminación de la trilogía que compone SC2, como tal mantiene los principales defectos de este fraudulento RTS. La historia culmina el disparate que comenzó con Wings of Liberty, yo en Lotv no sabía que pasaba, al final de la misma Kerrigan se convierte en un dios o algo así, un disparate, nada tiene sentido en esta basura de historia que se caga en lo que fué Starcraft y Brood War. La campaña en cuanto a historia no vale nada igual que Wol y Hots, totalmente prescindible.

    Sobre el multijugador, nuevamente añaden nuevas unidades para justificar la venta del juego, unidades innecesarias. El cambio mas importante viene por la reducción de la cantidad de minerales por base, esto es debido a que los jugadores se quejaban de que en Wol y Hots solo se jugaba a dos o tres bases y querían algo mas parecido a Brood War, normal ya que este es un juego muy superior, en fin, como los inútiles de Blizzard no sabían como arreglar esta basura de juego en el que se juega siempre a all ins a dos o tres bases y el late game siempre acaba en una corta batalla (segundos dura) o choque de dos bolas de la muerte, los genios de Blizzard decidieron aumentar (aún mas) las opciones de acoso a las líneas de trabajadores, y en eso se puede resumir LOTV, un simulador de aniquilar recolectores. Eso sí, las bolas de la muerte no han desaparecido, las unidades se siguen apelotonando igual que en las dos primeras expansiones, pero se han reducido el número de estrategias viables, como ahora hay menos minerales ahora todas las partidas son a expandir lo mas pronto posible o te quedas seco, una mierda vamos. Las nuevas unidades,con el Liberator, Cyclone, Ravager, Lurker, Adept y Disruptor, todas una basura, incluidos los lurkers que aquí no funcionan como en BW sino que son un arma mas para las deathballs. Me atrevo a decir que Legacy of the Void es peor que Heart of the Swarm, el último parche de equilibrio de este era superior a esta basura que es LOTV, ya digo un simulador de aniquilar recolectores pero que mantiene las deathballs, los ejercitos que se evaporan en segundos cuando se encuentran, etc, basura, y algunos caraduras dicen que LOTV se parece al estilo Brood War argumentando que ahora si se cogen mas expansiones, no les crean, no se parece en nada.

    A esta basura que culmina al fraudulento y pseudoRTS que SC2 le otorgo un 0/10.    … Expand
  18. krammerlock
    Jan 14, 2016
    1
    It is a very basic RTS with a lot of decoration and cartoons that mask there is nothing new here. Try the free trial if you are interested. Definitely don't spend money on this BS unless you have played the free trial.
  19. Freakingmachine
    Nov 12, 2015
    4
    Why I buy a Starcraft, and I play in masses effect 3? It is plagiarism. Even Amun's bombing is very similar to bombing of the Reaper. I am very disappointed, after all it is the end of history and it has to be unique.
  20. empleat
    Nov 19, 2015
    0
    I was there since start of beta.
    I read all patch note, for example adepts: since match 2015 they were op and blizzard didn't do anything about it, opposite to fix this unit they recently added upgrade for increasing their attack speed by 45% and remove upgrade for +30 shields and nerfed their shields about 30 which does nothing, now adepts are even stronger.
    I saw polt on stream, when    I was there since start of beta.
    I read all patch note, for example adepts: since match 2015 they were op and blizzard didn't do anything about it, opposite to fix this unit they recently added upgrade for increasing their attack speed by 45% and remove upgrade for +30 shields and nerfed their shields about 30 which does nothing, now adepts are even stronger.
    I saw polt on stream, when he hasn't mmr yet and played in lower leagues, losing to protoss diamond repeatly, because this strategy is unbeatable, you can also start with pylon rush and mothership core and you kill like 2 depos or bunker and force baracks back rebuild addons, just insane dmg.
    Protoss's carriers are unbeatable unit, since they can release interceptors they trade for minerals gas units, you release them and then you pull them back.
    Especially with combination of tempest of ht, they beat every unit in game.
    Zerg has vipers, which are useless vs carriers, but they can kill 20 vikings like on one click and they zerg can win with broodlords, since you have no vikings and raven pdd was nerfed about 100 second and seeker missle now cost 125 energy, it takes ages to get it and then your opponent simple pull his units back and it does nothing.
    So noone build raven anymore, also zerg nydus is immortal so even you prepare for it you will lose, because queens which pops out instantly heal it.
    In addition, this game has pretty crappy engine, it doesn't even support multicore and it is old like 8-9 years.
    Which cause extreme cpu and gpu bottlenecking, you will be glad if you run this game on 60 fps lategame.
    I can't really micro properly on 60fps, i am used play everygames on 144 and even it is not enough.
    I can notice even 7 ms input lag according to blurbuster input lag ab test, so 60 fps feels like for me 25 fps for most people .
    This game should really be optimized since it is played by pro gamers. also balance is awful, like swarmhost from hots, or protoss favored map for blinstakers rush, which causes 2014 was protoss wining all tournaments.
    This is just very little piece of this game what is broken.
    I play 1-2 games sometimes because of multitasking, that's all.
    Also it doesn't cost even 30euro, how cheap it is, i was developed already 2010 or something, it doesn't change gameplay at all, only 2 units per race were added and it is still brainless clicker game, which oponent can click better and guess better, because protoss has 20 all ins and it is not scoutable, since he can proxy everywhere on map , or on base clifs and scan doesn't help, it is about luck, or reaper which can be easily killed before jumps on cliff, on some maps especially with only one entrance and even othermatches for example zvz is about luck as well.
    I would give this game -10 if there was possibility of that.
    Developers are just lazy and ignore community and earn free money of it.    … Expand
  21. ilya_gg
    Nov 25, 2015
    0
    Epick broken ladder. You play at the level of silver? Not a problem, try to win a platinum and diamond. 1 win on 10 looses! nice! GG and BB starcraft muliplayer.
  22. peterwang
    Nov 10, 2015
    0
    it is a good game, I mean, some sort of good game, but don't you think it is too complicated and nosense! 40 bucks for a dlc? crazy, finally, I just wanna say I don't love this game. Don't buy it!
  23. Nekellor
    Aug 1, 2018
    4
    -Это наша последняя битва, друг мой. -Понимаю нам потребуется вся сила воли которая у нас есть. -Согласен, даже если мы погибнем о нас не забудут. Наши потомки запомнят нас как героев. -Здесь, с нами, будут бороться не только наши войны, но и наши предки. -Эн таро тосадар, мой друг. - Этнаро дос.... ааа хватит вы можите говорить быстрее. Какие же протосы скучные. Это их менталитет, все-Это наша последняя битва, друг мой. -Понимаю нам потребуется вся сила воли которая у нас есть. -Согласен, даже если мы погибнем о нас не забудут. Наши потомки запомнят нас как героев. -Здесь, с нами, будут бороться не только наши войны, но и наши предки. -Эн таро тосадар, мой друг. - Этнаро дос.... ааа хватит вы можите говорить быстрее. Какие же протосы скучные. Это их менталитет, все понимаю, но как же скучно их слушать. Убрали героя, добавили корабль с навыками. Еще одна альтернатива звездалетам и чудищам - кольцо адуна. Перепафосный финал. И не до пафосный финал-финал.… Expand
  24. res0nancer
    Jun 5, 2023
    4
    Не имея возможности соотнести свой опыт с опытом главенствующей сюжетной фракции не получилось проникнуться проблемами, которые стоят перед подконтрольной нами расой. Фракция имеет свои уникальные геймплейные фишки, но ядро неизменно - потому лично мне утомительно. Готовность перетерпеть геймплей ради сюжета была, только сюжет не переставал падать в качестве, а в конце (Эпилоге), такНе имея возможности соотнести свой опыт с опытом главенствующей сюжетной фракции не получилось проникнуться проблемами, которые стоят перед подконтрольной нами расой. Фракция имеет свои уникальные геймплейные фишки, но ядро неизменно - потому лично мне утомительно. Готовность перетерпеть геймплей ради сюжета была, только сюжет не переставал падать в качестве, а в конце (Эпилоге), так вообще произошел какой-то быстрый сюр. Подозреваю, что разработка 2 и 3 дополнения шла в более сжатых сроках и многие вещи, которые можно было сделать лучше, были оставлены как есть, к большому сожалению. В сюжетном плане уж точно все выглядит как черновой вариант, а не отполированный хоть сколько-то скрипт. Увы… Expand
  25. Nikolas_super
    Mar 5, 2022
    0
    Отличная игра, с хорошим сюжетом и графикой.
    Поставил плохую оценку, так как разработчики этой игры влезли в политику!
  26. Nepen1he
    Mar 10, 2022
    0
    games out of politics, juegos fuera de la politica, jogos fora da política

Awards & Rankings

8
#8 Best PC Game of 2015
26
#26 Most Discussed PC Game of 2015
9
#9 Most Shared PC Game of 2015

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
88

Generally favorable reviews - based on 62 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 61 out of 62
  2. Mixed: 1 out of 62
  3. Negative: 0 out of 62
  1. CD-Action
    Feb 4, 2016
    85
    The StarCraft II finale offers a decent but not breathtaking campaign and some tweaks to the multiplayer which now promotes quick, aggressive expansion. [01/2016, p.66]
  2. games(TM)
    Jan 29, 2016
    80
    This generous package will sustain and deepen the competitive side, but Legacy Of The Void also does enough not to scare away the casuals once the closing credits role and multiplayer beckons.
    Read full review
  3. Gamers' Temple
    Jan 26, 2016
    94
    Overall, I can easily recommend Legacy of the Void to any current StarCraft II player, and if you're new to StarCraft II then now is the perfect time to jump in and experience the full story arc. Blizzard has once again managed to add to an already great existing game, making it better and more complete without breaking anything that made the game great in the first place.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »