- Publisher: LucasArts
- Release Date: Feb 15, 2006
Buy Now
- Critic score
- Publication
- By date
-
While Empire at War does have an overall decent gameplay system that requires a mix of strategies, as well as a story-based campaign that can be played from the side of either the Rebels or the Empire, there's just not enough here to pull you away from the many great strategy games that are available today.
-
The computer AI doesn’t cut it, the units do retarded things sometimes, and the multiplayer game is either too long, or too uninteresting compared to other RTS games available out there – I would much rather play "Warcraft 3" or "C&C: Generals."
-
Ultimately, there's no single aspect of the game that really demands your interest.
-
The game starts out fun, but after awhile it can become very boring.
-
It's trying something completely different, and even when it doesn't work, it's true to its license and it's making bold choices. There's a lot to be said for this approach.
-
BoomtownI don’t want to give the impression this is just another lazy Star Wars game, because it’s clear a lot of love has gone into the game. But there’s a lack of ambition at the heart of Empire at War that is the ultimate reason for its failure to be a really great strategy game.
-
Its conquest content is thin and its RTS content is rudimentary, but the interplay between all these elements makes for an extremely immersive and convincing experience.
-
Empires at War is a poorly designed RTS that would have been laughed off the Gamestop shelves without its Star Wars skin.
-
Empire at War hits all the right notes if you're a Star Wars fan, but be prepared to grind out your victories.
-
Ultimately, Empire at War isn't just RTS-lite--it's RTS extremely lite. Hardcore RTS fans will rapidly grow bored, and even fans of the franchise are better served with Battlefront for its galactic conquest games, or Galactic Battlegrounds for a Star Wars RTS experience that's actually an RTS.
-
AceGamezAs much I hate to say it, Star Wars: Empire At War isn't worth the entry fee. This is a terrible shame, since it had such promise from the pre-launch screenshots, but sadly the repetitive and shallow gameplay, combined with the below par presentation and ludicrously high difficulty level, simply can't compete with the best of the genre.
Awards & Rankings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 264 out of 341
-
Mixed: 60 out of 341
-
Negative: 17 out of 341
-
Apr 3, 2014
-
Apr 14, 2014
-
KneelB4ZodDec 13, 2006