- Publisher: Activision
- Release Date: Nov 6, 2002
- Critic score
- Publication
- By date
-
Game InformerWell written and expertly implemented. [Jan 2003, p.119]
-
A deep-involving and highly addictive space-combat sim. The game's sharp learning curve and its complexity shouldn't be unrightfully misinterpreted as a game flaw, but rather as an essential part of the whole experience.
-
By far the most straightforward and enjoyable version of the series.
-
Although the controls can still be difficult to manage at first, Starfleet Command III is worth the effort.
-
The visual display of space and the ships is still badly executed but with tightened up control methods and an enjoyable plot to wage war through as the Federation develops a station that can detect cloaked vessels.
-
Where the game excels in its gameplay mechanics, it lacks in its visual presentation.
-
While both games offer unique experiences, the overall effect of Starfleet Command is much less engaging than that of "Bridge Commander."
-
An excellent game that will appeal to the hardcore sim-freaks, but only those who have large amounts of time to spend gaming.
-
A great game overall. Its voice acting, with the exception of the Borg, is superb--the game even features Patrick Stewart as Captain Picard, who provides voice-over for the game's tutorials.
-
PC GamerIt hurts to see an awesome game in a series I love be diminished by bugs. With some good patching, SFC III will be an excellent game. [Feb 2003, p.64]
-
If Taldren could take care of the unwieldy camera and add a little more Star Trek weirdness, Starfleet Command might truly take Trek games where they’ve never gone before: into 'A' range.
-
The camera view still needs some work and a 3rd dimension would greatly enhance gameplay and combat but they still are saddled with a game that, in the end is boring.
-
Computer Games MagazineEasily the most accessible and beautiful Trek combat simulator yet. Ultimately, though, it's only a small upgrade from the previous mission. [Feb 2003, p.72]
-
Advanced players and long time fans of "Starfleet Battles" will rue the simplifications of the rule set, though the great sense of online community still remains.
-
A disappointment. Not as good as the original. This is a series that has definitely lost something from its Interplay roots.
-
Computer Gaming WorldUnfortunately, this stellar tactical engine serves as the only highlight in a game with a lifeless campaign and enough technical problems to give Data a run for his money. [Mar 2003, p.100]
-
A slightly improved Star Trek tactical simulator, but that's pretty much all it is. The production values are still bland, and the user interface is just slightly better than before.
-
The campaigns are too dry, too random, and the combat too long and thoughtful by half.
Awards & Rankings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 13 out of 21
-
Mixed: 5 out of 21
-
Negative: 3 out of 21
-
NikE.Feb 24, 2003
-
MORTNov 26, 2002Three words: GE THE BORG.