Star Trek: New Worlds

 PC
Metascore
52

Mixed or average reviews - based on 23 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 4 out of 23
  2. Mixed: 9 out of 23
  3. Negative: 10 out of 23
  1. ActionTrip
    70
    Clearly an an unfinished game. We have yet to see whether the patch will remedy some of these problems. Well, quite frankly, there are too many obvious flaws and bugs, so it's going to have to be one helluva patch...
  2. Gamezilla!
    60
    Yet another flop for the Star Trek game franchise. Has there ever been a good one? At this point I really can't recall any. The many failures such as this one cast clouds over the possible sunrise of any good games that may have been released.
  3. GameSpy
    65
    Take this game back to the drawing board; make it a game that would be good WITHOUT the Star Trek name behind it and stop relying on a franchise to sell a product.
  5. Eurogamer
    50
    The beautiful graphics and authentic Trek feel aren't enough to overcome the confused AI, awkward interface and glacially slow pace in what is ultimately a disappointing game.
  6. PC Gamer
    55
    If you don't ahve high expectations for a Trek RTS, then you won't be disappointed. [Nov 2000, p.160]
    All this publication's reviews
  7. All Game Guide
    70
    If you've played "Star Trek: Armada," you'll find that Star Trek: New Worlds provides the other point of view and will complete your collection.
  8. Antagonist
    63
    Without the Star Trek name on this one, it's just another faceless bad strategy game with a really nice body.
    All this publication's reviews
  9. GamePro
    60
    A rockin' soundtrack along with quality sound effects and voice acting add to the production value, but can't improve the gameplay.
  10. IGN
    62
    The game is boring and badly executed.

Awards & Rankings

58
#58 Most Discussed PC Game of 2000

User Reviews

All reviews »
User Score
6.9

Mixed or average reviews- based on 18 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 11 out of 18
  2. Mixed: 3 out of 18
  3. Negative: 4 out of 18
  1. BillL.
    Jul 22, 2005
    10
    I think anyone who doesn't like this game needs to have their head examined. You just can't play one level and then make a I think anyone who doesn't like this game needs to have their head examined. You just can't play one level and then make a discision that the game sucks. This game is made for people to use their brains.… Full Review »
  2. A.Z.
    Dec 16, 2001
    10
    People should try and beat the game and not just play the first mission and say it sucks. I have this game and I will play it till I beat it.People should try and beat the game and not just play the first mission and say it sucks. I have this game and I will play it till I beat it. And for you "it sucks" peolpe you should play it more ofen like me because you might start to like it. And you could try and find patches to make it better. I would say that the makers made a perfect game!!!!!… Full Review »
  3. DustonB.
    Dec 1, 2001
    5
    The only saving grace to the game is that it's Star Trek. I normally don't even look at the RTS games but as a lifelong Trekkie I The only saving grace to the game is that it's Star Trek. I normally don't even look at the RTS games but as a lifelong Trekkie I gave this a shot. It's okay, the gameplay is easy and the graphics are sweet, but the lack of an ability to save really diminishes the desire to sit and dedicate any time to the game.… Full Review »
See all user reviews »