User Score
6.4

Mixed or average reviews- based on 253 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Negative: 67 out of 253
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
  1. May 23, 2017
    0
    Enjoy open world Call of Duty, where you meet same stupid AI, same bad graphics on high settings, console controls, horrible dialogues and boring cut scenes (which you can skip immediately). Go and kill whole village of innocent people (except invincible kids), because you can and nobody cares. Try out our awesome depleting silencer, which is completely useless after few shots. But onlyEnjoy open world Call of Duty, where you meet same stupid AI, same bad graphics on high settings, console controls, horrible dialogues and boring cut scenes (which you can skip immediately). Go and kill whole village of innocent people (except invincible kids), because you can and nobody cares. Try out our awesome depleting silencer, which is completely useless after few shots. But only one thing is different...your teammate is even more stupid a can easily die, fortunately he's only in prologue, where he is giving you some orders and you don't give a f**k and shoot like Rambo anyway. That's it, this is my review for this Far Cry: I don't care where for PS2. Expand
  2. Jul 31, 2023
    0
    Terrible gameplay backed up with a non-existent story, no reason to even think about playing this catastrophe.
  3. May 8, 2017
    2
    I really wanted this game to rock, but it's a buggy piece of **** and I wish I hadn't wasted my money on it.

    First, after 8 hours of playing it, it randomly deleted my savegame despite me exiting the game normally. The fool that I was, I decided to play it again, and this time, after the third mission, the "repair" function just stopped working on the silencer on guns, making the
    I really wanted this game to rock, but it's a buggy piece of **** and I wish I hadn't wasted my money on it.

    First, after 8 hours of playing it, it randomly deleted my savegame despite me exiting the game normally.

    The fool that I was, I decided to play it again, and this time, after the third mission, the "repair" function just stopped working on the silencer on guns, making the game useless and pointless to play (imagine your sniper shot being heard loud and clear each time you shoot someone.)

    Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.

    As for gameplay, the game has a ridiculously long load time and the much-touted "open world" is pointless. It's mostly empty and the only thing you get to do is drive around in your buggy. It's like the devs heard that "open world" is the big thing and threw it in there. Unlike Far Cry, you cannot climb up most hills unless the surfaces have special ledges for you to hang on, which appear only when you press Ctrl near them. Buildings too are a pain to climb. Most can't be climbed.

    Save your money. Buy another game.
    Expand
  4. May 14, 2017
    0
    this game crashes everywhere.
    I one primary mission i can't pass the **** tunnel beacuse the game always crash.
    This is after the 2 hours So i can't refund it on Steam.
    My score is 0 beacuse i can't play
  5. May 10, 2018
    0
    i made it to the third mission before I deleted it.very poor game, I was spoted a mile away up on a cliff camouflaged in a bush with my silenced sniper rifle.and what,s with the driving,totally weird.waste of money.
  6. Apr 28, 2017
    0
    Stupid gamehttp---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  7. May 9, 2017
    2
    SGW3 is not good compare to other Open World games.

    Environment Graphics and Characters Graphics Design look terrible (worse than Crysis 1 graphics). Sound and Music are disappointed because they use something like "Russian song" for the game. Maps get glitch when pointing Mouse Cursor to any icon on it. I don't like the way they set AntiAliasing as the default and there is no way to
    SGW3 is not good compare to other Open World games.

    Environment Graphics and Characters Graphics Design look terrible (worse than Crysis 1 graphics).
    Sound and Music are disappointed because they use something like "Russian song" for the game.
    Maps get glitch when pointing Mouse Cursor to any icon on it.
    I don't like the way they set AntiAliasing as the default and there is no way to turn it off. That's cause laggy and choppy.
    Loading time is too long while Game graphics is terrible.

    I played SGW2, it's bad. And SGW3 even worse.
    Expand
  8. Jun 11, 2017
    2
    While not as hyped as a Ubisoft Product this game comes with just as many bugs. The "CryEngine" has always been a resource hog but this game is using 10Gb+ of physical ram and will continue to use more if I add more sticks. On-top of the horrible frame rates which admittedly could be my GPU's even with two Geforce 650TiB im getting under 25fps with everything set to low and resolution atWhile not as hyped as a Ubisoft Product this game comes with just as many bugs. The "CryEngine" has always been a resource hog but this game is using 10Gb+ of physical ram and will continue to use more if I add more sticks. On-top of the horrible frame rates which admittedly could be my GPU's even with two Geforce 650TiB im getting under 25fps with everything set to low and resolution at 1600x1080 thats right I cant even run at 1900+ yet my gpu's are only at 50-60% usage. Moving on this game has its share of bugs with in the first 10-20minutes of game play I was hanging on fences not a full foot off the ground. Falling through church roof tops trying to get a vantage point while evading mines that dont stay marked after you "Scout" them. This game goes so far as to have a gear reset quest, nothing as bad as giving you all the awesome gear then taking it away after a lengthy and unnecessary prologue that frankly I don't care about, which if this foreshadowing is any indicator the "Ghost" is the main protagonist's baby brother. The game actually has a quest that makes you give up all the gear that you have acquired and purchased and has at no point a POI, Quest (side-quest or main) that allows you to go back and pick everything back up that you put in a random dumpster under a windmill that has no discernible marker! I would have given this game a much higher score had it not forced a silencer mechanic into the game that didn't even need to be there in the first place! Having said that I really had high hopes for this game unfortunately I personally feel it feel 9ft short of a 10ft hurdle; thus I cannot and will not recommend this game to anyone that enjoys first person shooters especially with the memory leak Expand
  9. Dec 26, 2018
    4
    It's very mediocre game, that's the best I can give for this game. There's nothing memorable, that's worth mentioning or even recommending this product. i only had some of fun time sniping enemies, but that's about it.

    Boring, dead (however pretty small) open world with same locations - some outposts that need clearing by shooting 5-10enemies, when you clear that outpost there's nothing
    It's very mediocre game, that's the best I can give for this game. There's nothing memorable, that's worth mentioning or even recommending this product. i only had some of fun time sniping enemies, but that's about it.

    Boring, dead (however pretty small) open world with same locations - some outposts that need clearing by shooting 5-10enemies, when you clear that outpost there's nothing else to do in that area, super boring characters, lame story, almost whole main game is getting mission on laptop, going from point A to point B, shooting primary target then getting out of area - repeat. You can compare this game with Far Cry 3 / 4 in a way, only that this game is at least 20 times worse.
    Graphics are mediocre too, very blurry, sh*t anti-aliasing, there's ton of graphical bugs even after all the patches.

    It's super monotonous game, not even worth buying during the sale. The only reason I'm giving it 4 out of 10 is that sniping was kind of fun, for a few hours... It gets boring after 5 hours or so and you'll just probably delete.
    Expand
  10. Aug 14, 2018
    4
    Bad game. But not so bad. Playable but you can play others better. So sorry - save your time lads.
  11. Nov 5, 2019
    2
    i have played this game for 36 hours, i played it from release date... but this is the worst 60 euros i have ever spend! the game is having a lot of bugs (still) and enemys despawn when you get over 350 meters away( most of the time)... its a sniper focused game, and you cant shoot people over 350 meters? this has been an issue since launch... i dont even wanna talk about the optimization,i have played this game for 36 hours, i played it from release date... but this is the worst 60 euros i have ever spend! the game is having a lot of bugs (still) and enemys despawn when you get over 350 meters away( most of the time)... its a sniper focused game, and you cant shoot people over 350 meters? this has been an issue since launch... i dont even wanna talk about the optimization, because... its kinda non existing... and the story, yeah... just forget about that one to!

    multiplayer is almost worse than TAKEDOWN RED SABRE, and that says a lot!

    all in all, dont buy this game for more than 10 euros, and no matter what, dont expect anything from this game!
    2/10
    Expand
  12. Nov 11, 2022
    4
    optimizasyon bokum gibi sürekli aynı görevleri yapıyorsunuz 5 saat sonraa sıktı oyun amk
  13. Mar 1, 2022
    4
    Score: 4.3

    After trying the first and second installment, i wanted a third one that was similar to the second in terms of game design, but making it better. What i mean by that is, i wanted linear missions, with a linear story, without all the **** that comes from an open world.... And i dnd't get it. It seemed boring most of the times, game play crap of open worlds i didn't like
    Score: 4.3

    After trying the first and second installment, i wanted a third one that was similar to the second in terms of game design, but making it better.
    What i mean by that is, i wanted linear missions, with a linear story, without all the **** that comes from an open world.... And i dnd't get it.
    It seemed boring most of the times, game play crap of open worlds i didn't like
    Don't really recomend
    I'll hope that the Contracts game is better, and gives a kind of Hitman experience with sniping
    Expand
Metascore
59

Mixed or average reviews - based on 18 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 1 out of 18
  2. Negative: 2 out of 18
  1. Mar 10, 2019
    80
    A slick sniping title in name, but one that also encourages creativity, delivers action, and demands adaptation, Sniper: Ghost Warrior 3 is one hell of a ride. Although it has a lackluster story and a handful of minor issues, it’s still an immensely enjoyable separatist kill fest set in the gorgeous open-world landscapes of former Soviet Georgia.
  2. PC Gamer
    Jul 21, 2017
    64
    Thrives during missions, but suffers when you're exploring its open world and bearing witness to its odd design choices. [Aug 2017, p.80]
  3. LEVEL (Czech Republic)
    Jul 5, 2017
    60
    SGW3 is an uncongenial mix of the failed open-world gameplay combined with useful sniping. It can be recommended only to grimly determined snipers. [Issue#275]