Red Orchestra: Ostfront 41-45

 PC
User Score
8.6

Generally favorable reviews- based on 1300 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 1,091 out of 1300
  2. Mixed: 65 out of 1300
  3. Negative: 144 out of 1300
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. DeVoiD
    May 11, 2006
    3
    Well, it certainly "looked" like a great game, but allt he issues just to be able to play it!!! First the zonealarm issue, the work around.. dont have zonealarm startup (leaving you vunerable to attacks and spyware), then Steam (the delivery system for this game) has issues with the game and you have to have steam strat up in its own safe mode!!! The complete and total LACK OF SUPPORT by Well, it certainly "looked" like a great game, but allt he issues just to be able to play it!!! First the zonealarm issue, the work around.. dont have zonealarm startup (leaving you vunerable to attacks and spyware), then Steam (the delivery system for this game) has issues with the game and you have to have steam strat up in its own safe mode!!! The complete and total LACK OF SUPPORT by the company that made this game, leads me to score this VERY low. Im so dissatisfied with it, I have deleted its local content from my PC, and unfortunately, the EULA stats that you will not get your money back on anything bought through steam.... (maybe they should look at each state as its consumer law is different and I could potentiall go through small claims and probably be sucessfull, but why bother). BE WARNED if are thinking about buying this game, if you have zonealram or buy it through steam, you have a lot of work to do to get this game to work. If you have any questions, dont hold your breath for any help on their forums. This could have been a good game, but lets face it, this was made as a MOD and was produced by people who won the "build something unreal" contest...... so its not like it was built by people who are in the industry, just a collection of people whose skill at programming, graphics, etc is just not up to par. D.… Expand
  2. EmilM.
    May 11, 2006
    9
    Awesome game. Waited for a game with tanks that actually work rigt for very long time. Has some issues and funny glitches otherwise plays good.
  3. Goose
    May 10, 2006
    10
    If there is a better war simulation game I would like to know.
  4. StewartP.
    May 10, 2006
    3
    The glitches that remained unresolved; slow loading maps, unfixed kicks out of the game, poor animation make a a great 1990's game - the game has a nice gritty feel and is OK to play but the frustration it produces just trying to get online to play it (and to stay online) aren't really worth the effort. Had it been tested more thuroughly and put out first as a demo I The glitches that remained unresolved; slow loading maps, unfixed kicks out of the game, poor animation make a a great 1990's game - the game has a nice gritty feel and is OK to play but the frustration it produces just trying to get online to play it (and to stay online) aren't really worth the effort. Had it been tested more thuroughly and put out first as a demo I wouldn't have purchased it. This game in itself has make me very apprehensive about purchasing any games from STEAM without first being able to try a demo.… Expand
  5. StarikIP.
    May 9, 2006
    10
    First somehow shocking, the game made me feel something I have not experienced since I played 'Thief' and WWII Online. I was scared and run for my life like the boy from the 'Red badge of courage' did in the first battle. Well, I've managed to survive and turned back, but the Call of Duty and all BFs got wiped off from my HD permanently: R.I.P.
  6. AdamM.
    May 9, 2006
    0
    This game is not in anyway a special game. It's graphics go back to the days of Half-Life 1, or even pre-Half-Life! Before I go on, we must remember... IT IS THE YEAR 2006, NOT 1997! The AI sucks, big time, it is worse than James Bond: Goldeneye on N64. Combat is really fake. I would recommend getting the best WWII game (PERIOD), which is Day of Defeat: Source! This game was aThis game is not in anyway a special game. It's graphics go back to the days of Half-Life 1, or even pre-Half-Life! Before I go on, we must remember... IT IS THE YEAR 2006, NOT 1997! The AI sucks, big time, it is worse than James Bond: Goldeneye on N64. Combat is really fake. I would recommend getting the best WWII game (PERIOD), which is Day of Defeat: Source! This game was a waste of $30! The worst game I have ever played!… Expand
  7. ModigaD.
    May 9, 2006
    10
    A brilliant War simulator, the only game that comes to mind, close to Red Orchestra is Operation Flashpoint. The gameplay is unique to almost all other games of the genre, no crosshairs being the most noticable feature. It can take some players a while to get used to but once you know when to keep your head down and how to act as a team with your team, this game is topped by no other A brilliant War simulator, the only game that comes to mind, close to Red Orchestra is Operation Flashpoint. The gameplay is unique to almost all other games of the genre, no crosshairs being the most noticable feature. It can take some players a while to get used to but once you know when to keep your head down and how to act as a team with your team, this game is topped by no other online war sim. The graphics may be slightly outdated in comparison to other recent titles but once you turn on anti-aliasing outside the game, those feelings soon drift away.… Expand
  8. DarkM.
    May 8, 2006
    9
    Outstanding squad based FPS, where solid team tactics are a must for victory in every one of the maps. You can almost smell the cordite as your watching machine gun fire richocet off of solid objects while crawling around in the muck. I've also found that since you cant bunnyhop or run-n-gun that the average 12 years olds tire of it quickly, leaving a mostly mature adult community Outstanding squad based FPS, where solid team tactics are a must for victory in every one of the maps. You can almost smell the cordite as your watching machine gun fire richocet off of solid objects while crawling around in the muck. I've also found that since you cant bunnyhop or run-n-gun that the average 12 years olds tire of it quickly, leaving a mostly mature adult community witch is a refeshing change of pace then the teamkilling adolesents you find in most other online FPS. Also the introduction of controllable arty is a welcome addition that adds strategy and depth to this already excellent game. The tanking is a little arcadish, but its not as bad as Battlefield 2 (reminds me alot of the Panzer Elite online games i used to participate in) All in all a great game, and i will be enjoying it for years to come!… Expand
  9. Aeneas2020
    May 8, 2006
    9
    good game certainly gave me a great deal of enjoyment although i'd say to anyone put off at first really try to play this for at least a week then you'll see where the fun lies.
  10. PloppySlow
    May 8, 2006
    8
    Fantastic game love the realisam mis not having a knife but bayonet is a blast. Realy gets the heart rate up Can't wait to see new unreal engin and dx 10.
  11. DeCoYMe
    May 7, 2006
    9
    I will never give a 10 because evrything can always be better, but RO is going to be hard to beat, this game is more for the mature FPS player that likes to incoporate tactics, you will need a good videocard, but is definatly worth taking a look. you need to run the game in high res, but the reward is worth it. you need to lead the target, there is projectile drop over distance and you I will never give a 10 because evrything can always be better, but RO is going to be hard to beat, this game is more for the mature FPS player that likes to incoporate tactics, you will need a good videocard, but is definatly worth taking a look. you need to run the game in high res, but the reward is worth it. you need to lead the target, there is projectile drop over distance and you need to place your shot other wise it will deflect of vehicles. the air/artilery strikes are spectacular to watch from a distance and disorientaiting to be in. there is no radar so in game comunication is a must. Well done Tripwire.. Decoy..… Expand
  12. JackC.
    May 7, 2006
    10
    It takes not only skill, but brains as well. An awesome combination that makes this game, the best land sim. of the year.
  13. ManV.
    May 7, 2006
    3
    Oh...My...God... these were the words that came out of my mouth when I first saw the game ads all over steam. I was astonished, only by the idea of a modern game that gave you the opportunity to play as a soldier in the WW2 eastern front...Oh...My...God were the words that came out of my mouth when I first played the game...but it was NOT for a good reason... First of all: The game is Oh...My...God... these were the words that came out of my mouth when I first saw the game ads all over steam. I was astonished, only by the idea of a modern game that gave you the opportunity to play as a soldier in the WW2 eastern front...Oh...My...God were the words that came out of my mouth when I first played the game...but it was NOT for a good reason... First of all: The game is slow,really slow (I even had to reduce the graphics' detail levels and resolution but no improvement). The graphics did not annoy me, but they surely were not modern-day graphics. The animation was tragic,unrealistic...almost robotic. The sound was OK. These aspects, I could easily cope with. IF!!! If the gameplay produced what every gameplay's target is...FUN. This game is surely not fun... I was sooooo dissappointed. The interface is unreasonably complicated (even if I reallocated the keys,I was still confused) There are literally 1000 commands out there, you have to familiarize with. I agree with the absense of live map, i agree with the amount of damage caused by a shot... but i totally disagree with the absense of crosshair...now, you can call me noob and underskilled, but if there was any fun in fighting with my own self, just to put an enemy in my ironsights, believe me, I would sit down and eat my keyboard to learn how to do it properly...but...there is no joy in it...no fun...the point of a game is this. FUN. If I wanted to live a totally real warfare, I would enlist myself in an army to go to a front in real life.Now,there is another thing.Maybe less importand...some of the maps are huge to walk around...it doesn't help at all. Don't get me wrong...I was eagerly anticipating this game to come out and I pre-ordered it as soon as it came out as an ad and this is the reason I am furstrated...I personally find it promising,as an idea but...unplayable. Do something for us underskilled noobs who want to play as digital soldiers in the eastern front....… Expand
  14. Shape
    May 7, 2006
    10
    Most realstic game ive ever played. Graphics could be improved, but i think when set on high are much better than Cod2.
  15. Sgt.Rockski
    May 7, 2006
    3
    Game is using an old engine that is clunky. In steam, this game was 25 bucks, promised a lot and delievered a lot of crashing. I run a fairly state of the art system and this game still fails. The forums on steam are filled with complaints from users, I practically don't even play this anymore because they are not fixing teh bugs in it and teh game is a drag when it is rebooting or Game is using an old engine that is clunky. In steam, this game was 25 bucks, promised a lot and delievered a lot of crashing. I run a fairly state of the art system and this game still fails. The forums on steam are filled with complaints from users, I practically don't even play this anymore because they are not fixing teh bugs in it and teh game is a drag when it is rebooting or crashing your system all the time. Thumbs down until they work it out. But something else is my advice, and researcxh this game through what the players are saying on teh steam forums about it. It is definitely not even close to an 8 rating.… Expand
  16. Golf33
    May 7, 2006
    10
    Not for everyone but if you are after intense, highly realistic ground combat then this is for you.
  17. PaulL.
    May 7, 2006
    9
    Awsome graphics if played at full and awsome gameplay definently a game worth having.
  18. Lucas
    May 6, 2006
    10
    Great gameplay, best first person animations/models I've ever seen, excellent maps. The graphics are surprisingly well done for such an old engine. It features such subtle things that when you switch games, you realize that every game needs what RO has. The tank combat is amazing as well as the infantry combat. Reccommended to anyone mature enough to get the hang of this game.
  19. JulioT.
    May 6, 2006
    9
    Excellent game with the warfront detail. I've never expext this game to be like that, I was amazed how real look those tanks, artillery strikes, high-detail half tracks. The only thing I am worry i that we need more maps to enjoy this game in different scenarios. Keep it up!!!!!!!!1
  20. JasonH.
    May 6, 2006
    10
    If you like realism this game is for you. This game is better than the noob filled bf2.
  21. JoeG.
    May 6, 2006
    9
    What dod source should have been!!! needs some patching tho but pretty damn good game.
  22. TonioDestroy
    May 6, 2006
    9
    De lo mas real que hay para jugar. Le faltan pequeños detalles para ser perfecto.
  23. AlexB.
    May 6, 2006
    3
    Poor, bad graphics, slow irritating unrealistic difficult gamepley. Wasted my money.
  24. Dillweed
    May 6, 2006
    9
    The multi player is great..Compared to COD 2 it blows the doors of of it and considering its a older engine that dosent help the COD2 cause either.
  25. MarioR.
    May 5, 2006
    9
    Realista y muy jugable, lo que le falla son los gráficos, pero no quiero pensar en que máquina necesitaríamos para mover el juego si estuviese con el motor del HL2 o del nuevo unereal. Se ve algo difuminado, pero es cuestión de acostumbrarse, sobretodo viniendo del DOD:Source.
  26. CraigR.
    May 5, 2006
    8
    Great game all 'round, only complaint is the loading times. The graphics are good - not great though, but the gameplay is amazing. Great work Tripware.
  27. GlenF.
    May 4, 2006
    10
    Best WW2 shooter out there. The graphics may be slightly out of date but they are still nice(gameplay>graphics). The game is highly realistic and the best gun model/ animations out of any WW2 FPS. If you like games like CSS this my not be your cup of tea. I suggest giving it a try anyway, if you're looking for a realistic WW2 experience.
  28. AlanS.
    May 3, 2006
    10
    I found red orchestra to be highly realistic, unlike most tactical shooters we've seen in this day and age. Although I didn't favor that it was on the unreal engine, it still is very non-linear, strategic, and fun to play.
  29. Sgian_Dubh
    Apr 25, 2006
    10
    This game, running astride Unreal 2004, is one of the best online games I have ever Played. Unreal has single player for the offliners, but This game, if you have patience to learn, will give participants a chance to live battle without reticles, perfect aiming and invincibility. RO is as real a game as it gets. However, I stiull haven't a clue how to pick up weapons? could someoneThis game, running astride Unreal 2004, is one of the best online games I have ever Played. Unreal has single player for the offliners, but This game, if you have patience to learn, will give participants a chance to live battle without reticles, perfect aiming and invincibility. RO is as real a game as it gets. However, I stiull haven't a clue how to pick up weapons? could someone help me on that?… Expand
  30. CharlesC.
    Apr 22, 2006
    8
    I personally love the game, it is everything I expected CoD 2 to be and more. After being woefully disappointed by CoD 2 and its extreme lack of customer support, I found RO to be a breath of fresh air. It plays well, requires tremendous team work, and is all around fun. Now since there are no crosshairs, it takes a little getting used to. The realism of the weaponry makes me wonder how I personally love the game, it is everything I expected CoD 2 to be and more. After being woefully disappointed by CoD 2 and its extreme lack of customer support, I found RO to be a breath of fresh air. It plays well, requires tremendous team work, and is all around fun. Now since there are no crosshairs, it takes a little getting used to. The realism of the weaponry makes me wonder how anyone was ever able to fight a war and win back then. Those that dont like it are the unskilled players that normally have to hop all over the screen to get a kill, or hope to keep from being killed. You can not do that in this game, and I love that. Team work and strategy are what it is all about, makes for a great evening of fun and gun. If youre looking for a game that you can actually get into, and enjoy immensely, then this is the best $25 you can spend. The game comes out of the box with 13 stock maps, and more are in development. Honestly, youll find once you get past the learning period, not only will you thoroughly enjoy the game, but you may find it has improved your shooting and K/D ratio in other online FPS games. Its worth a look.… Expand
  31. texas_dolly
    Apr 20, 2006
    10
    Not everyone is meant for this shooter, and that's what makes it shine. Thumbing your nose at it's ut2.5 engine just makes you look like a bigger fool. Bunnyhopping AWP rambos can sit at the kiddy table while the grownups enjoy the best 25 bucks they've ever spent on a fps.
  32. JonP.
    Apr 20, 2006
    10
    AWSOME GAME. BTW, annoyed, dont rate a game you havnt played yet. This game is EXTREMELY realistic, fun, but does have a big learning curve. WWII lovers and FPS diehards MUST have this game!
  33. DanielC.
    Apr 19, 2006
    3
    This is not worth buying. I brought this on steam and it shows up along side of games such as counter strike : source and half life 2, my favorite games ever. This costs $25 so is already over-priced. It uses the ancient unreal engine which, if it had been replaced with hl2 engine would have made me give this game a 6-8 mark. The one good thing is the gameplay, the maps are brilliantly This is not worth buying. I brought this on steam and it shows up along side of games such as counter strike : source and half life 2, my favorite games ever. This costs $25 so is already over-priced. It uses the ancient unreal engine which, if it had been replaced with hl2 engine would have made me give this game a 6-8 mark. The one good thing is the gameplay, the maps are brilliantly designed and all elements of the game work smoothly apart from one or two glitches. But the soomthness is nothing compaired to the quality of grapihcs and movemnet (which I find weak in this game) compared to any hl2 bassed game. Save your money and go buy somthing else. This game does not deserve 80. Only recomended to WWII fans and realism junkies.… Expand
  34. spitfire
    Apr 19, 2006
    10
    The best WWII FPS game I have ever played, I hope new maps will come soon. Excelent Job!
  35. Craig
    Apr 18, 2006
    10
    This game isn't appealing to everyone, mostly because peple are more used to run and gun, arcade type games. Call of Duty is fun, but is not as focused on realism as Red Orchestra. In RO, if you don't play smart and keep your head down, you lose it. No crosshairs, great. No zooming while aiming down the sight, even better. Slow reloads and grenade throwing, it's all real This game isn't appealing to everyone, mostly because peple are more used to run and gun, arcade type games. Call of Duty is fun, but is not as focused on realism as Red Orchestra. In RO, if you don't play smart and keep your head down, you lose it. No crosshairs, great. No zooming while aiming down the sight, even better. Slow reloads and grenade throwing, it's all real here. So many real factors in this game, so I won't list them here. If you're interested, download the game manual and have a read. Ballistics, GOD how I needed them! The game is all the more fun if you play with an organised team and co-ordinate attacks. And what I love most, is the people currently playing are co-operative. I got tired of COD's "You're better than me, you hack" attitude years ago.… Expand
  36. Eric
    Apr 18, 2006
    10
    Red Orchestra is amazing. Simply the best WWII online FPS/Simulation around. There are a few bad reviews here, but notice the poor grammar and sentence structure used in those reviews. Enough said.
  37. ThomasM.
    Apr 18, 2006
    10
    Sha-Weet! so realistic and well balanced. this game is not for noobs. russian friggin rule.
  38. Jawad
    Apr 18, 2006
    10
    The ultimate realistic WW2 FPS. This game pwns. Period.
  39. Erik
    Apr 18, 2006
    9
    I was originally turned off by the first few reviews that came out for this game...man were they wrong! This is by far the best FPS I have ever played..so exciting so realistic and most importantly fun. They must have been big fans of CS and BF2...then when they tried RO they got schooled :) The only problems are there arent enough servers and load times are too long. Seriously an amazing I was originally turned off by the first few reviews that came out for this game...man were they wrong! This is by far the best FPS I have ever played..so exciting so realistic and most importantly fun. They must have been big fans of CS and BF2...then when they tried RO they got schooled :) The only problems are there arent enough servers and load times are too long. Seriously an amazing game...love it.… Expand
  40. AdamJ.
    Apr 18, 2006
    9
    It's a very good game. Definately the MOST REALISTIC WW2 game out there. It is very easy to be misled by the people who gave it poor ratings. Some of them claim to want "realistic war simulation," but then complain when the actual view that one would have from a real tank is too small for them (believe it or not, in a real war, you cannot simply switch to 3rd person to get a better It's a very good game. Definately the MOST REALISTIC WW2 game out there. It is very easy to be misled by the people who gave it poor ratings. Some of them claim to want "realistic war simulation," but then complain when the actual view that one would have from a real tank is too small for them (believe it or not, in a real war, you cannot simply switch to 3rd person to get a better picture of the battlefield... sorry to spoil it!). There was one person who complained about the "outdated Unreal engine," and this same person claimed to have been "misled" by the promo video. This is where competency of ones own system comes into play. When developers put together a promotional video that serves as the face of their product, it only makes sense that they are going to make it using a top-of-the-line system, which will in turn display the game and graphcis at their best. (SPOILER ALERT: Everyone does this! If Tripwire wants to promote their game using a video that was made on a brand new, state-of-the-art computer, then that is simply good marketing. I do not have a brand new computer, and I realize that before I buy a game that I am not going to be able to max out the settings. However, I still buy games, and I do not complain because my own out-of-date system can't handle it. Finally, any complaints about bugs are very unwarranted. Yes, there have been a lot of bugs in this game. Yes, there are some lag issues and long load times. HOWEVER, Tripwire already had a support site set up and ready to go by the time the game was released, and they are already addressing issues and working on a patch. In fact, I would say that I much more pleased with Tripwire than almost any other gaming company (besides Valve, of course), mainly because they are acknowledging that their product has flaws, but that they are also devoting a lot of time and energy to eliminating thos flaws. BOTTOM LINE: Tripwire is a brand new company of guys who won a mod contest... cut them some slack. They have very quickly put together an awesome game, quite possibly the most realistic WW2 fps out there, and they are giving it to us for $24.99. Compared to the $50.00 pricetag of most new games, this is a great value. The technical support and attention to flaws is unmatched by any other game developer out there (once again, besides Valve), and I think that I can speak for almost all mature gamers out there when I say that we would much rather have a cheap game that needs some fine tuning (with amazing tech support and developer attention) instead of an over-priced game that we have to wait 3 years to play. If you're an adult and can withstand a few minor setbacks, then this game is going to be a great purchase. If you can't handle realism and expect some mod-makers to deliver a fast, cheap, flawless game their first time, then you're going to be waiting a while.… Expand
  41. JohnJ.
    Apr 18, 2006
    10
    Best ive played so far.No bunny hoping, run and gun frenzy like most of other fps. Its just what i was looking for.
  42. Annoyed
    Apr 18, 2006
    0
    Only five critics bothered to rate this game, and none of them rated it higher than 85. Also, the metascore is 80, not 81, as Steam claims. As for the game itself, what's the point? Save your money for some other, better prepared game.
  43. ChrisH
    Apr 17, 2006
    9
    Excellent game. Played with a capable team, no other online shooter comes close. Astounding value for money.
  44. MichaelR.
    Apr 17, 2006
    9
    Excellent gamplay - great realism... But i missed some more gore and blood!!!
  45. JoumanJ.
    Apr 17, 2006
    10
    Amazing game.
  46. YashaS.
    Apr 17, 2006
    9
    Well, I am not the "War-Game" fan but after playing this for about an hour i was amazed how intense the game, I was really shaking after a airstrike. So i really want to reccomend the game to "War-Game" fans and actually everwone.
  47. TrevorI.
    Apr 16, 2006
    6
    Extremely laggy, load times rediculous. Poor effort.
  48. JebP.
    Apr 16, 2006
    8
    Good gameplay graphics are good but but are fuzzy even in higher res. and with high quality settings.
  49. Greg
    Apr 15, 2006
    10
    Excellent game. Great graphics great strategy
  50. GrahamH.
    Apr 15, 2006
    10
    Game play is great, it only needs some more game types i.e. last man standing and so on, it would make it as one of the best ever.
  51. MacariusM.
    Apr 15, 2006
    9
    Wish i could give it a "ten" but russian speech in the game spoils everything...it'd be great if there was some kind of alternative russian speech...listening to this moron and his dumb phrases makes me sick...it spoils the atmosphere of the game...not enough professionalism in this part... game as a whole is excellent
  52. VincentB.
    Apr 15, 2006
    10
    This last week I purchased Red Orchestra on Steam, and I'd have to say I'm impressed with this game. RO- is a military first person shooter based around the Russian and German engagements during World War 2. The first thing I would like to bring to attention, is that some of you may groan when you hear about another WWII shooter, and I agree, WWII shooters are fine, but have This last week I purchased Red Orchestra on Steam, and I'd have to say I'm impressed with this game. RO- is a military first person shooter based around the Russian and German engagements during World War 2. The first thing I would like to bring to attention, is that some of you may groan when you hear about another WWII shooter, and I agree, WWII shooters are fine, but have been done and done again, and the general theme has been beaten into the ground. This game however is a fresh breath of air on a number of levels. The first thing that differs from the majority of other WWII games is the fact that it takes place in war torn Russia. There won't be any storming the beaches of Normandy, or fighting for wake or Midway island, but you will find yourself in a very immersive, authentic combat environments ranging from large bombed out cities complete with interior buildings to the huge fields and rolling hills of the Russian countryside. One thing that separates RO's maps from those of other games is their openness and dynamics. There are boundaries, but they are practical; If you want to take the long way around and use the tall grass for cover, you can. There are a number of ways to get into the building you're attacking. The city maps don't force the players to bottleneck into a single kill zone. Buildings have multiple levels and plenty of places to hide. There is plenty of cover, these maps are set up like a war-zone. Take cover behind a burned out vehicle, or dive into a bomb crater, use sand bag fortifications to set up MG positions. This game gives you the flexibility to play out your class and utilize the environment to your advantage. Vehicles, yes, there are drivable vehicles in RO. for some of you that are still a bit shell shocked from the BF2 vehicular onslaught, your reaction may be to flinch. I understand, your concern, and I assure you, this is different. Vehicles take skill to operate, tanks require a crew to be fully functional, tank turrets operate with directional keys so the more heavily armed vehicles operate more like machines rather than superhuman suits of armor. Also, since you need to spawn as a tank crew member to use the tanks, and those player slots are limited, just as all of the classes. This feature was implemented to ensure a balanced team and also prevents all the BS associated with pointless bickering and fighting over getting to the vehicle spawns first. It was good to see vehicles enhancing gameplay without dominating the map. The weapons in RO are very satisfying. They work on very simple principals: You see no on-screen crosshairs, your gun will move independent of your field of view when you move the mouse, but this doesn't mean your weapon is inaccurate. Your gun hits what it points at, the only thing is, if you're not using the sights you have to judge where your gun is pointing, and since the gun moves freely on the screen, it isn't as simple as using the middle of your screen. Solution; either practice aiming without them, or pull up your iron sights and aim. (Just like real life.) You will be pleased to see your enemies drop dead with one well placed shot, whether you're gunning down waves of Russians with a light machine gun, or sneaking around German fortifications with with your pistol, you won't be disappointed in your weapons ability to drop enemies. Gun models are decent to nice, animations are detailed and very well done, gun sounds are great; this game has very good sound effects to begin with, and the weapon reports are realistic, especially at distance. Factors like bullet travel and bullet drop have been taken into consideration making it necessary to lead and compensate for distance on longer engagements. Supported fire positions play a large roll in infantry combat. your weapons are accurate, but are effected by recoil rather than scripted shot dispersion. To compensate for recoil, you can force the muzzle back down between shots, or during automatic fire, crouch and or prone to stabilize yourself, or one of my favorite features of the game is how you can rest your weapon on objects like walls or sandbags, or even on the sides of trees, any solid object, and a small indicator icon will appear letting you know your weapon is stable. With this feature you can negate most of the recoil and muzzle sway. Machine gun support isn't a matter of running and gunning. weapons like the light machine guns and anti material rifles require that you deploy your bipod either on the ground or on an object to be controllable. The level of realism in this game is rivaled only by simulation games like Operation Flashpoint, yet RO achieves this while maintaining a nice amount of fast paced action. With cool features like getting your weapons shot from your hands, replacing melted barrels on your MG42, attaching/detaching bayonets that add weight to the end of your weapon resulting in slightly more muzzle sway, cooking off grenades or even clubbing and pistol-whipping enemies. Your map and hud displays only the most basic of information. there is no ammunition counter, so just like real shooting you have to keep track of your shots. A damage indicator displays where you are injured; damage to the legs will slow the player down. Damage to the arms will increase muzzle swaying. The game is in no way a slow race like SWAT 4, nor is it a marathon jump, run, dive, shoot, parachute fest like BF2. The player has a stamina system that will allow them to sprint for only so long and jump only so many times before becoming exhausted. The player becomes audibly out of breath at which point the weapons become a bit more difficult to stabilize. You can dive, as well as lean around corners, but from my experience, I can say fairly confidently that these features aren't over used or abused as in some games, I don't even think they can be. Speaking of games, I should point out how RO takes a step away from the normal FPS style. It has most of the elements of real combat without feeling like a computer game. I mean that in the sense that there are no on screen icons floating around players, friendly tags only appear at very close range, and only when your pointing right at them. Just as this game brings realism to the table, it also adds in some of the harsh realities and confusion associated with the fog of war. Friendly fire happens; If you run over the hill where your enemies are, and your team doesn't know it, there's a good chance you'll be shot from either side. Communication is key for your teams success as well as survival. Which I might add, the game features an outstanding voice chat system. And along the lines of harsh realities, there is an appropriate amount of gore. bodies will bleed, shrapnel will tear people up, grenades will blow limbs off, and a direct HEAT round from a tank will reduce the player to a fine mist of blood and bone fragments. There is respawning, but it works in waves of reinforcements. You spawn with everyone else at a set time in a cycle. Instead of a ticket ratio, the teams have a reinforcement percentage, the less ground your team captures and the more your team gets shot up, the lower that percentage will go, and the lower it goes, the lower the frequency of spawns, until the percentage is reduced to zero, and the remaining players are eliminated, resulting in the end of a round. The objectives are similar to the flags in Battlefield 2. however instead of flags, you will have a building, or small village to capture and defend. The team play is very nice in RO. No one person can win the game, and it takes the cooperation of the team to capture and hold objectives. Points are awarded more on an objective basis rather than pure kills. I am aware of a stat system, but I have not investigated it yet. It's running off of the Unreal 2.5 engine, and although it's slightly out of date, RO's developers managed to squeeze every last drop out of the engine. The visuals are in no way bad. they are quite nice, especially considering the engine. On the plus side, this means the game is very flexible and forgiving for those of us who haven't dropped 3 grand into a computer. As far as complaints towards the game, I can think of two off hand. One, map load times are a bit long, and two, falling damage is a bit excessive, other than that, I am more than satisfied with Red Orchestra, especially with its reasonable price of $24.99 on steam. I purchased it online via steam without a hitch, but you can get a retail box version if you manage to find one. I would have to say though, this game is not for everyone. If you prefer more arcade style games like Counter Strike or the get up and go instant action of Battlefield 2, you may not have the patience for Red Orchestra. Some people may not like the game at all. However, if you are a fan of the more tactical military first person shooters, if your tired of leet speakers and little kids turning your games into lame spam contests, and you can learn to respect a game who's developers actually did their homework and produced a realistic game. RO may be just what you're looking for.… Expand
  53. MalekE.
    Apr 15, 2006
    10
    It is awsome game!! if you dont beleive try it.
  54. MikeM.
    Apr 15, 2006
    8
    GREAT small unit infantry tactics sim. Very smooth gameplay, probably the best FPS for this time period.....BUT you guys HAVE to do something to improve the tank combat. It need much more of the real feel the infantry side has. The transport vehicles work fine, but the tanks need some major work.
  55. TariqA.
    Apr 15, 2006
    10
    Great graphics, great game!!!
  56. DanT.
    Apr 15, 2006
    10
    Red Orchestra is a stunning achievement. Tripwire has made a game that really makes you aware of your fragility as a soldier and the power of the weapon you hold in your hands. Brutally fair, this game might not be for someone looking for the arcade action of UT or even the psuedo-tactical Counter-Strike, but for someone willing to learn how the game should be played there is one hell of Red Orchestra is a stunning achievement. Tripwire has made a game that really makes you aware of your fragility as a soldier and the power of the weapon you hold in your hands. Brutally fair, this game might not be for someone looking for the arcade action of UT or even the psuedo-tactical Counter-Strike, but for someone willing to learn how the game should be played there is one hell of a war game here.… Expand
  57. JohnB.
    Apr 15, 2006
    2
    Compared to games of its caliber and goals, it falls short due to technical limitations. The idea of realism itself ends up become a shortcoming of the game, especially in the community, as it ends up being an excuse for certain gimmicks and gameplay features (or lack of them). I feel there was significant ambition, but too much for a game won out of a competition from a mod.
  58. IanB.
    Apr 15, 2006
    3
    I bought this game with great anticipation, only to be greatly let down. First off both Day of Defeat and Call of Duty are light years ahead of this game, even Operation Flashpoint I would say has it up on this game. The grapics are mediocre at best and the game is choppy even offline with normal settings. The interface is not as easy as most first person shooters, the grenades handle I bought this game with great anticipation, only to be greatly let down. First off both Day of Defeat and Call of Duty are light years ahead of this game, even Operation Flashpoint I would say has it up on this game. The grapics are mediocre at best and the game is choppy even offline with normal settings. The interface is not as easy as most first person shooters, the grenades handle poorly. The only thing that the game offers differently than the other shooters is sneaking element - in which I would then recommend Operation Flashpoint or better Battle Field:1942, over this game. In short, I will never buy a game off Steam without viewing a demo of it first. This game comparably sucks!!!!… Expand
  59. Christiaan
    Apr 15, 2006
    9
    the guns are good but some thing n the map itself are a little bit fake but the game is nice!
  60. PaulJ.
    Apr 15, 2006
    10
    Just been reading some of the comments, some of them are seriously stupid, just because you can't aim or shoot for * doesn't mean this game is bad, ***ooo where's the crosshair!! there isn't one!? damn this game sucks!!*** lol, i can see how people come up with comments like this, it is a hard fps game, but once u get the hang of it it's truely amazing, and theJust been reading some of the comments, some of them are seriously stupid, just because you can't aim or shoot for * doesn't mean this game is bad, ***ooo where's the crosshair!! there isn't one!? damn this game sucks!!*** lol, i can see how people come up with comments like this, it is a hard fps game, but once u get the hang of it it's truely amazing, and the graphics are NOT BAD AT ALL, maybe consider some new graphic cards if you're having trouble.… Expand
  61. AaronL.
    Apr 15, 2006
    10
    absoluately brilliant, in terms of realism, there is no other ww2 games that can beat this, and i don't think there will be for a long time. (maybe if they release a second one :) )
  62. DannyM.
    Apr 15, 2006
    10
    Nice graphics and gameplay.
  63. O_ring_master
    Apr 14, 2006
    9
    Nice tanks battles ,intense infantry actions,hight realism better than call of duty and battlefeild,hard on ram quite long loading with 512meg,
  64. JeffB.
    Apr 14, 2006
    10
    Most authentic and immersive FPS yet to date. Don't expect COD or MOH. Expect to be killed a lot while you unlearn all the tendencies you picked up in those games. As you do, you will find your scores improving, and you'll find yourself sucked deeper and deeper into each map. Game of the year candidate for sure.
  65. DavidJ.
    Apr 14, 2006
    10
    Very good game . I like the game play and the realism . I have played alot of games out today and this game beats them all .
  66. Vi3trice
    Apr 14, 2006
    10
    Best game ever. Yet,underappreciated....This is to all the people that gave this game a 0 : If you think youre so good...make better than them.You wont have enough money to make it, dumbass.
  67. TreeKillah
    Apr 14, 2006
    10
    Realism, realism, realism. That is RO:O in a nutshell. Do not buy this game if you are a fan of run-and-gun, or bunny-hopping. If you want to feel like you are really fighting on the Russian Front in 1943, buy this game. Yes, the engine is old, and the graphics are not cutting-edge, but they are good enough. Besides with a newer box, you should be able to run 4-8xAA, and 8-16x AF with no Realism, realism, realism. That is RO:O in a nutshell. Do not buy this game if you are a fan of run-and-gun, or bunny-hopping. If you want to feel like you are really fighting on the Russian Front in 1943, buy this game. Yes, the engine is old, and the graphics are not cutting-edge, but they are good enough. Besides with a newer box, you should be able to run 4-8xAA, and 8-16x AF with no problems. That'll take care of some graphics issues.… Expand
  68. JamesJ.
    Apr 14, 2006
    10
    This game is amazing and is only going to get better as the devs continue to update it... It blows their original (the mod version) away, not to mention the competition...
  69. DanH.
    Apr 14, 2006
    9
    i really like this game, and for all the ones complaining about the graphics, this game uses a slightly upgraded version of the Unreal 2004 engine, therefore it is outdated slightly. All in all, i love this game, the sound is great, the realism is awesome, and the gameply if fun as hell ps. for the one who said this game came out of DOD:S, thats not true becuz this game was a mod for i really like this game, and for all the ones complaining about the graphics, this game uses a slightly upgraded version of the Unreal 2004 engine, therefore it is outdated slightly. All in all, i love this game, the sound is great, the realism is awesome, and the gameply if fun as hell ps. for the one who said this game came out of DOD:S, thats not true becuz this game was a mod for Unreal tournament way before DOD:S even came out on steam.… Expand
  70. DeanD.
    Apr 13, 2006
    10
    Finally after all the arcadish imitations, there is a game that rewards skill and teamwork. No more emptying a clip into an enemy and wondering why they didn't drop. The best reason to buy this game is to watch and laugh at the run'n'gunners run headlong into a firefight, die repeatedly, and then complain about the game. This game is simulation. If you treat it as a Finally after all the arcadish imitations, there is a game that rewards skill and teamwork. No more emptying a clip into an enemy and wondering why they didn't drop. The best reason to buy this game is to watch and laugh at the run'n'gunners run headlong into a firefight, die repeatedly, and then complain about the game. This game is simulation. If you treat it as a simulation, then it is very rewarding and you will survive rounds longer. This means you will have to rely on crawling, leaning, running and diving behind cover, and aiming down iron sights. If this sounds too difficult for you, than you have not matured as a gamer and you should return to CS:S and DOD:S so you can bunny hop and circle strafe like a crazed crack bunny. Remember, only in CS:S can you jump upand down and fire a headshot with a sniper rifle. I am thrilled that this game only attracts mature, skilled gamers. Thank-you Tripwire. Whatever you do, don't dummy down this game to widen your market share.… Expand
  71. ChristopherD.
    Apr 11, 2006
    10
    Most immersive WWII game I ever played! The sound is truely amazing and awe inspiring then ANY game I ever played. The added effects like motion blur and bloom really bring the game to life, even though the game doesn't have the most recent graphic technology implemented, the graphics show how gritty combat can be and brings geat immersion.
  72. ChrisK.
    Apr 11, 2006
    8
    online RO is great, single player... well its a multiplayer game so dont expect great offline challenges. Graphics are good, but not bleeding edge. This is not *and not trying to be* a run n kill-um-all FPS, its about flanking, covering fire and tatics. Not to be approached in the same mindset as a UT game or DOD, CS etcetc.. you need to stick at it to get the best as its not easy at online RO is great, single player... well its a multiplayer game so dont expect great offline challenges. Graphics are good, but not bleeding edge. This is not *and not trying to be* a run n kill-um-all FPS, its about flanking, covering fire and tatics. Not to be approached in the same mindset as a UT game or DOD, CS etcetc.. you need to stick at it to get the best as its not easy at first. Graphics: 7 , Gameplay 9, easy of play 7, X factor 8.. I like it.… Expand
  73. VincentT.
    Apr 11, 2006
    10
    My god ive been waiting for a game like this for years.Keep it up this game is gonna get better i can see.Its so Authentic Tanks.Uniforms Brilliant. One Gripe though cant get on the Shelves in England.But who cares im gonna get from my steam account.I have not played anythig for over a year since WoW World of Warcraft,But hey the ppl who have made Red Orchestra I SALUTE you one and all.
  74. ShooterJ.
    Apr 10, 2006
    10
    It cannot be described as FPS. It is something else. More like OFP and AA. But better. Much better.... Ok .. back to playing :)
  75. OberstG.
    Apr 10, 2006
    10
    This is without any doubt the best multi-player FPS WWII game produced sofar. Before Ostfront the RO mod ruled the WWII FPSes but OF is even more refined bringing computer gaming realism even further - perhaps further than many mainstream triggerhappy gamers can take. Realism is a subjective word but being a game it suceeds in conveying a submersive and satisfying experience.The foci of This is without any doubt the best multi-player FPS WWII game produced sofar. Before Ostfront the RO mod ruled the WWII FPSes but OF is even more refined bringing computer gaming realism even further - perhaps further than many mainstream triggerhappy gamers can take. Realism is a subjective word but being a game it suceeds in conveying a submersive and satisfying experience.The foci of the game are realism, tactical thinking and teamplay as oposed to the other mainstream kiddie games out there (think bunny hopping, ammo counters, crosshairs, scripted story lines etc). It will probably not appeal to the BF, DoD and CS fans out there as it requires quite other skills to sucessful play (think 'brain' and "cooperation" instead of 'keyboard twitching reflexes' and a fragaholic mindset). Hardware-wise you will need a goid graphics card and lot of memory for the ultimate experience. I look forward to the future of this game. The only real minus is that they dropped support for Linux and Mac users who are now ditched with the RO mod.… Expand
  76. GariA.
    Apr 9, 2006
    9
    this game is effing intense i wanna play it now everybody will know how the russo defeat those nazis.
  77. MattG.
    Apr 9, 2006
    10
    this game is realidtic has great detail on the smallest things. the gameplay rules as it is challenging and not piss easy like cod2 or dod.
  78. MTatonka
    Apr 8, 2006
    0
    I have to agree, this game is horrid. What are you other people looking at? Weapons behave like an out of control firehose, player moves (from first person) with no fluid action. Your stance changes and you have to reset your iron site every time. There has to be some intuitive design to the player, i.e. reload your weapon when its empty or re-chamber a round after you have taken a shot.I have to agree, this game is horrid. What are you other people looking at? Weapons behave like an out of control firehose, player moves (from first person) with no fluid action. Your stance changes and you have to reset your iron site every time. There has to be some intuitive design to the player, i.e. reload your weapon when its empty or re-chamber a round after you have taken a shot. The sound is deplorable, you cannot differeniate where a shot is coming from or where someone is walking or running.
    The maps are nice and the I enjoy the teamwork necessary to complete the objectives.
    Go back to the drawing board with that and make it better.    … Expand
  79. chadr
    Apr 6, 2006
    10
    I didnt enjoy this much when i first played it,but after some good hours of play time this game grew on me alot!!! The realism of the game is top notch the graphics i would say are up to par with todays games. The controls are a liitle tough to get used to but after you figure everthing out they work quite well. I own a boatload of games i play css alot but this is NO css you must useI didnt enjoy this much when i first played it,but after some good hours of play time this game grew on me alot!!! The realism of the game is top notch the graphics i would say are up to par with todays games. The controls are a liitle tough to get used to but after you figure everthing out they work quite well. I own a boatload of games i play css alot but this is NO css you must use strats and work as a team, there will be no spray -n- pray here either you will die very quickly using that method....grab the visine some and some strong coffee you'll be up for a while playin this game ......great game great price 4 real go get it!!!!!… Expand
  80. Ordie25
    Apr 5, 2006
    9
    very well rendered. Sweet eye candy. a little goofey on the controls. wish this was as popular as bf2 and had as many players. it is worth the 25 bux to have it in your arsenal of fps's. i would give it a 10 if games had MANY people playing. again, it is a very good game.
  81. Boogyman
    Apr 5, 2006
    10
    This game succeeds where others fail. The IGN review sums it well. Here's the clincher, if you are good enough to last the learning curve you'll find the game fun even heart-pounding.
  82. Moni0
    Apr 4, 2006
    10
    Just the best game I ever played. Graphism good with large and varied maps, detailled textures and best weapons skins. Best sounds. Best gameplay, not a stupid arcade game, but with tactic and teamplay needed.
  83. DavidK.
    Apr 4, 2006
    9
    Most challenging WW2 FPS out to date. Sure it has some bugs but these guys are from the modding community not from a mega developer/ publisher powerhouse with an unlimited budget and they are attempting to make the game historically accurate. The most important play mechanics work great and the physics is the best.And this is a hell of a first attempt (not counting the Mod) at getting Most challenging WW2 FPS out to date. Sure it has some bugs but these guys are from the modding community not from a mega developer/ publisher powerhouse with an unlimited budget and they are attempting to make the game historically accurate. The most important play mechanics work great and the physics is the best.And this is a hell of a first attempt (not counting the Mod) at getting away from all the nonsense in BF2 and COD2 . I can see how it will put some people off forcing you to use timing,accuracy ,breathing etc. before you fire your weapon. People who are impatient and want to immediatly own everyone like CS shouldn't even bother installing it.It forces the pace of the game down to a more normal level. Most rewarding experience if your into tactical realism and sick of bunny hopping and twitch and shoot FPS.… Expand
  84. JohnM.
    Apr 3, 2006
    9
    There are some bugs in the game but they are not disrupting the true feeling. This game brings more to the table than any other WW2 FPS on the market. RO is nothing at all lke call of duty you must work as a team to achieve goals and command certain outposts. The range of weapons and classes allowed changes on each map. One of the better FPS out there!
  85. OrBiTaL
    Apr 3, 2006
    5
    Having downloaded the game and played it i see nothing new here,it offers no more than CODUO only CODUO has better graphics and is easier to control.I'm sorry but the graphics are dated and the new boards out today will soit this thing out i cant give it less than 5 simply because some poor sole sat at his desk for 8 months creating this but it seems he was refused tea breaks and fellHaving downloaded the game and played it i see nothing new here,it offers no more than CODUO only CODUO has better graphics and is easier to control.I'm sorry but the graphics are dated and the new boards out today will soit this thing out i cant give it less than 5 simply because some poor sole sat at his desk for 8 months creating this but it seems he was refused tea breaks and fell asleep during programing.… Expand
  86. M.G.
    Mar 31, 2006
    10
    The best FPS i've ever played. The most realistic WWII FPS ever. Some of the best features are voice chat, controllable tanks, realistic physics, etc..
  87. NovalG.
    Mar 31, 2006
    3
    This game is a complete failure: Its graphics are lousy, the game interface could be greatly improved, and the whole game, itself, does not work well. Although the game attempts to be realistic, it does not succed too well. I also noticed that the single-player mode honestly sucks: The bots have the intelligence equal to a bar of soap! I think that the designers should either remove the This game is a complete failure: Its graphics are lousy, the game interface could be greatly improved, and the whole game, itself, does not work well. Although the game attempts to be realistic, it does not succed too well. I also noticed that the single-player mode honestly sucks: The bots have the intelligence equal to a bar of soap! I think that the designers should either remove the single-player mode or improve the bots AI pathing. THe multiplayer, on the other hand is mediocre. The player bases is small and the bugs are very very dismall. The last time I played this wretched game, it was not unheard of for me to fall through the ground and get stuck in-between things. I have to honestly say, "This game has a great idea but it is lacking the required material in orde for it to be successful and decent!"… Expand
  88. AllanT.
    Mar 31, 2006
    10
    Imersive WWII eastern front action, i .... my self the first time i played it scary as hell. This is WAR! (no niceitys of modern combat - no crosshairs ;) Grab a rifle, grab a tank, prime your grenades, I shall see you on the battlefield.
  89. DavidB.
    Mar 31, 2006
    4
    Most of the ratings here are by the staff in order to promote the game they will probley remove this comment. honestly this game is alot like any other ww2 fps the graphics are bad and could be greatly improved. the game play is better then expected but still lacks in areas. I dont think its worth the money.
  90. ErikA.
    Mar 31, 2006
    7
    I think the game is pretty good as a whole. The infantry fighting is not very intuitively put together. They should have been more like DoD:S in that aspect. The best parts of the game are the armored vehicles, tank operation, and artillery calls. This aspect is absolutely awesome! If they replaced infantry fighting with DoD:S infantry fighting, it would easily be the greatest WWII FPS I think the game is pretty good as a whole. The infantry fighting is not very intuitively put together. They should have been more like DoD:S in that aspect. The best parts of the game are the armored vehicles, tank operation, and artillery calls. This aspect is absolutely awesome! If they replaced infantry fighting with DoD:S infantry fighting, it would easily be the greatest WWII FPS ever. The tanks are really the coolest part, though. I can't emphasize that more!… Expand
  91. FireBladeX
    Mar 30, 2006
    10
    Perfect game!
  92. BlakeH.
    Mar 29, 2006
    10
    I love how this game has combined the best aspects from various games to create, what I would say, is the best WW2 FPS game so far. Great attention to detail, engaging gameplay, lots of gore, and different styles of gameplay, are all reasons why this is an overall great game.
  93. AnonymousMC
    Mar 29, 2006
    10
    All of these 10's know what their talking about... RO is the best FPS I've played in my life. I was sold in the beta, but OST front adds a level of emmersion through detail that I never expected. Great work guys! (oh, and my street cred is CS beta 3-7,TacOps,Wolf3d, etc ^p^).
  94. KaseyT.
    Mar 29, 2006
    9
    Very good game. Any body who played the original will love this version more. It seems a twinge more arcade, then the ut2k3/4 mods. The tanking seems better, and the graphics are great.
  95. Okeedokey
    Mar 29, 2006
    6
    I give it a solid 6 because personally I think RED ORCHESTRA developed out of DoD:S because it's wwII, and it came out AFTER DoD:S sooo ya. But I give it credit for trying and the graphics.
  96. KenM.
    Mar 29, 2006
    10
    Quiet simply the best game I have ever played Achtung Panzer! Los los los!
  97. JakeE.
    Mar 27, 2006
    9
    I find Red Orchestra to be one of, if not the best WWII first person shooters. It emphasizes teamwork, and chooses a lesser known Russians vs Germans situation.
  98. EliasO.
    Mar 27, 2006
    10
    This game is simply the best WW2 shooter that is out there.
  99. NickB.
    Mar 27, 2006
    10
    Simply the best! :D The realism setting, the addiction, the quality is su-perb.
  100. JustinC.
    Mar 27, 2006
    10
    The best blend of realism, authenticty and simple team based action I have found yet. If you like your WWII games, enjoy multiplayer team based gaming and want something a bit different offering some real chance for immersion and proper battlefield tactics then look no further.
Page:

Awards & Rankings

34
#34 Best PC Game of 2006
3
#3 Most Discussed PC Game of 2006

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
81

Generally favorable reviews - based on 22 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 20 out of 22
  2. Mixed: 1 out of 22
  3. Negative: 1 out of 22
  1. CPUGamer
    80
    I absolutely love the attention Tripwire has given to the small details in the game.
    Read full review
  2. IGN
    85
    There's very little gameyness in RO and a whole lot of gritty crawling along the ground so you can flank over to that machine gunner and allow your team to advance to the next spawn point objective.
    Read full review
  3. GameSpot
    79
    Red Orchestra is an enjoyable, team-based online shooter for those who like the Battlefield-style games but want a more technical and realistic experience.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »