- Publisher: Microsoft Game Studios
- Release Date: Feb 29, 2012
User Score
Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 106 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 18 out of 106
-
Mixed: 24 out of 106
-
Negative: 64 out of 106
Review this game
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- By date
- Most helpful
-
Jul 14, 2012To improve this game they should add inside views to all the planes and add additional dlc content. Also they should add ai planes, moving ground vehicles, and some of the other features that were in previous releases from microsoft.
-
Aug 8, 2012This game is fairly good for a free to play. The controls are simple and not hard to master and the graphics are OK as well. I would not recommend the ridiculously overpriced DLCs as for a game like this its really not worth it. Overall though, a good free-to-play.
-
Apr 12, 2012
-
Mar 15, 2012it has fairly good graphics and a few dumb down planes that actually feel pretty good in a crosswind. The higher challenges are actually a challenge. You can try it yourself and decide. download it for FREE, please donâ
-
Apr 6, 2012No Track IR! Deal breaker. Microsoft shows us again that they have technical ability but lack in imagination. Seriously, Naturalpoint have approached MS (see AVSIM forums) but they have still made no decision on implementing it or otherwise. I will not be playing this game or purchasing any DLC for this game until they implement Track IR. Unbelievable approach by MS.
-
Apr 8, 2012It´s not really a simulation, it´s like flight Arcade...
This game has a lot of bugs, after 2 Missions the game is crashing and i have to restart.
I hope this will be fixed in the future. -
Apr 28, 2012
-
Jun 10, 2012
-
Mar 10, 20133 for the effort, 2 for the game itself and 0 for microsoft having canceled flight simulator x to do this piece of poo. for arcade fans, i recommend crimson skies, and for flight simulator fans, i recommend flight simulator X or flight simulator 2004.
-
Aug 5, 2013Seen as a game this very well achieved, but seen as a simulator successor of a caste of simulators superiors do not achieves coincide, In eagerness to innovate and provide better visual experience, lost in realism and cuts off the gameplay freedom
Hugo Aldazoro
Awards & Rankings
-
Jul 29, 2012The Microsoft Flight's offer is rather poor, however, thanks to a well-structured and deep gameplay and an excellent technical department, the title cut its market share.
-
Apr 27, 2012It might have had a bumpy take-off, but with a bit of hard work Flight should grow into a competent sim worth flying. [May 2012, p.56]
-
LEVEL (Czech Republic)Apr 25, 2012Empty and almost useless game offers little reason to try it, even for a weekend player – despite the fact that the basic version is free. [Apr 2012]