User Score
6.4

Mixed or average reviews- based on 164 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 96 out of 164
  2. Negative: 52 out of 164

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
  1. Aug 13, 2017
    0
    Did they even try when making this game? The answer is probably no, I would expect more for paying what we did but we get bugs and **** Not even a game, just a edgy tech demo
  2. Aug 13, 2017
    0
    Game is very empty even during the betas peak in users, the mechanics are somewhat cool but also very inconsistent and buggy. It's not really worth the price just play overwatch. PC version has the same issues when i played the beta, shame.
  3. Aug 13, 2017
    0
    I tried to download the PC version to see if it worked any better than the PS4, and no in fact it's WORSE. If you can believe that.... Game ran at very low fps even on my gaming computer.
  4. Aug 13, 2017
    0
    hard to control wonkey and honest gives me a headache everytime I play. Did they even play this game before it release I got a refund for this mess doesn't even deserve a single copy sold tbh
  5. Feb 6, 2020
    0
    Call of Duty: Black Ops has more character than this joke of a game. Playing this was a wast of time.
  6. Aug 7, 2017
    4
    It's difficult to believe Cliffy B was behind this mediocre game, maybe he should have brought a few more people from Epic. It's more Overwatch or Black Ops III then Unreal Tournament and suffers gravely for it. I can't speak for changes to the game since Closed Beta, but what I played was not encouraging. Low time-to-kill, unbalanced classes, uninspired character design and boring maps.It's difficult to believe Cliffy B was behind this mediocre game, maybe he should have brought a few more people from Epic. It's more Overwatch or Black Ops III then Unreal Tournament and suffers gravely for it. I can't speak for changes to the game since Closed Beta, but what I played was not encouraging. Low time-to-kill, unbalanced classes, uninspired character design and boring maps. You might want to pass this one up until it goes free or whatever. Expand
  7. Aug 8, 2017
    4
    Overwatch meets Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare. Everyone is Pharah, including Genji and Tracer. And Pharah. The gameplay is pretty solid but the whole low-gravity firefighting is just not fun.
  8. Aug 8, 2017
    1
    Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare meets Overwatch meets Quake. Game is decent for a first try from a new studio, but do yourself a favor and just get one of the previously listed games, much better overall, with at least 2 more levels of polish. Considering this game has 3 maps, it gets old quickly
  9. Nov 24, 2017
    1
    #DeadAF should be F2P ,This game have very low playerbase. Almost impossible to find a game its to late to save it while there is better alternative games like overwatch and quake champions
  10. Oct 18, 2018
    4
    The game was fun while it lasted. Sadly it is dead now. I hate how Bosskey didn't listen to their userbase. It would still be alive if they did
Metascore
76

Generally favorable reviews - based on 34 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 27 out of 34
  2. Negative: 0 out of 34
  1. CD-Action
    Oct 30, 2017
    80
    LawBreakers is a very good online shooter that distinguishes itself with a couple of original, spot-on ideas. What makes it trail behind Overwatch are disappointingly forgettable characters. [10/2017, p.46]
  2. Oct 19, 2017
    75
    LawBreakers' most important element is the strong, tight gameplay that conveys the feeling of a classic shooter in a modern package. But the rest of the game disappoints with uninteresting characters and maps, not a lot of options and just a few modes.
  3. Edge Magazine
    Sep 14, 2017
    80
    No matter what comes next, Lawbreakers is a success. It's proof, among other things, that veteran design talent really does mean something - and that the shooters of the late '90s still have something to teach the modern game industry. This is more than nostalgia: it's a paean to the genre's potential, performed by people who know it well. [Issue#311, p.104]