User Score
7.4

Mixed or average reviews- based on 72 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 43 out of 72
  2. Negative: 10 out of 72
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
  1. Apr 10, 2017
    7
    By far, Farming Simulator 17 represents the best of the agricultural sims to be found on the PC. However, it seems the developers are are well aware that each of their creations will be considered the best of the genre and use this as an excuse to be lazy, having objects interact with each other in only the most minor of ways. This leads to ridiculous and cartoonish behavior of playerBy far, Farming Simulator 17 represents the best of the agricultural sims to be found on the PC. However, it seems the developers are are well aware that each of their creations will be considered the best of the genre and use this as an excuse to be lazy, having objects interact with each other in only the most minor of ways. This leads to ridiculous and cartoonish behavior of player controllable vehicles. Not to mention they have a history of charging a lot for minor content DLC. The games feel like a developer taking their audience for granted instead of striving to make their game the best it could be. But at its core, Farming Simulator 17 is thoroughly enjoyable, and does a great job of providing you with the freedom to manage your farm any way you see fit. With a little more work, the next incarnation of this game could take audiences by storm. Expand
  2. Aug 5, 2017
    6
    The game is good, varied, and never boring, there are many things to do, an incredible amount of vehicles and jobs, but the graphics are really poor, they are the same graphics of FS 15 and FS 2013, just not immersive at all, they are just bad, and same for the unrealistic physics! Terrain is still in 2d, grass and trees leaves are in 2d too, poor job, they could improve those parametersThe game is good, varied, and never boring, there are many things to do, an incredible amount of vehicles and jobs, but the graphics are really poor, they are the same graphics of FS 15 and FS 2013, just not immersive at all, they are just bad, and same for the unrealistic physics! Terrain is still in 2d, grass and trees leaves are in 2d too, poor job, they could improve those parameters and the game was perfect Expand
  3. Feb 9, 2020
    6
    Great Game After 2 years and some time playing FS19 it start to get old and boring nothing new
    Without Mods Boring game with basic and a little bad/old graphics
    BUT its better for bad PC than FS19
  4. Sep 21, 2021
    6
    Почти ничего нет нового просто не понимаю зачем покупать новую часть если изменений нет просто добавили побольше всего это не интересно. Оптимизация в игре отстойная её просто нет графика страшная но все равно игра фризит.Почти ничего нет нового просто не понимаю зачем покупать новую часть если изменений нет просто добавили побольше всего это не интересно. Оптимизация в игре отстойная её просто нет графика страшная но все равно игра фризит.
Metascore
69

Mixed or average reviews - based on 12 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 3 out of 12
  2. Negative: 1 out of 12
  1. Games.cz
    Feb 14, 2017
    70
    Farming simulation with a strong focus on manual machines control and administration of operations. Its bonuses are relaxing gameplay, vastly varied offer of a farmer's equipment and hand-some visuals. Negatives include a bit lukewarm approach to innovations, not very friendly controls and UI or several controversial design decisions.
  2. Jan 17, 2017
    70
    If you’ve yet to try a game in the Farming Simulator series, this is a good entry point, but it does not offer a lot for veterans.
  3. CD-Action
    Jan 13, 2017
    75
    Despite all the simplifications (e.g. plants need just a couple of days to grow) there’s something addictive about FS17 that makes you switch off your thinking and just farm, farm, farm. [01/2017, p.59]