Eisenwald: Blood of November

 PC
Metascore
tbd

No score yet - based on 2 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 0 out of 2
  2. Mixed: 1 out of 2
  3. Negative: 1 out of 2
  1. Games.cz
    Feb 14, 2017
    40
    Expansion doesn’t brings anything new, does not solve any problems, get tired of embarrassing parallels to the US elections, and up to all this it somehow managed to lose a considerable amount of magic of the original game.

User Reviews

All reviews »
User Score
7.0

Mixed or average reviews- based on 8 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 5 out of 8
  2. Mixed: 0 out of 8
  3. Negative: 3 out of 8
  1. Temur
    Nov 2, 2016
    10
    Я большой фанат Легенд Эйзенвальда, меня так давно не цепляли игры в принципе. Поэтому я был рад, когда кровь ноября появилась на Кикстартере,Я большой фанат Легенд Эйзенвальда, меня так давно не цепляли игры в принципе. Поэтому я был рад, когда кровь ноября появилась на Кикстартере, и что игра так быстро в итоге вышла. Здесь есть то, чего мне немного не хватало в Легендах - свободы действий. Аллюзии на политику бесподобны, а секретная концовка (добрался до нее во второе прохождение) вообще вызвала у меня неудержимый смех. Правда, мой друг сказал, что в игре высмеиваются все, я в принципе согласен, но все равно мне это понравилось. И еще было то, что я очень люблю - много странных и необычных квестов. Чего только стоит квест под названием "Подводные пчелы"! Писатель просто талантище, вот не знаю, разработчик он или профессиональный писатель, снимаю шляпу. Всем рекомендую, особенно если понравились Легенды, и особенно сценарий Проклятый Замок в них.… Full Review »
  2. cottandy
    Nov 3, 2016
    4
    When writing about this game, you can't but say about "Legends of Eisenwald", because practically nothing has changed. Yes, it's a new story,When writing about this game, you can't but say about "Legends of Eisenwald", because practically nothing has changed. Yes, it's a new story, but there's nothing new in it. It's not interesting at all and you have to do everything you had done before many times. So let's start .

    The predecessor was really something original and interesting at the start. It was a nice game and surely was one worth experiencing, but unfortunately not for very long. It had lots of problems, mainly with gameplay, practically all of which remained in "Eisenwald: Blood of November". Yes, there were patches, but they didn't fix even a half of what should have been. And not only it inherited all the problems, but minimum a new one appeared - bad optimisation. They said, that graphics became better, but I didn't notice anything like that and what I did is that the game became slower!

    It's not a new game, it's just a bad copy of "Legends of Eisenwald". 6 for it and no more than 2 for the new one.    … Full Review »
  3. RustyJames
    Nov 2, 2016
    2
    LoE was a really nice game, i gave it 8 of 10. Graphics was nice, sounds and story was ok, interesting gameplay with similar mechanics, likeLoE was a really nice game, i gave it 8 of 10. Graphics was nice, sounds and story was ok, interesting gameplay with similar mechanics, like in King's Bounty or some features from Heroes. But it had a dozens of bugs and needed a lot of gameplay improvements, especially in battle system. And now after 1,5 years of original, they release the sequel, but nothing has changed! All same s**t: pointless walking and grinding the random mobs, lack of quest, same graphics, same sound bugs, same battles, lack of good items, very slow level up, lack of new buildings and mechanics, etc. Unfortunately after 300th pointless battle i delete it. The good site is price - only 3$. Not recommended, if you don't play Legends of Eisenwald - better play it.
    2/10    … Full Review »
See all user reviews »