Crossout

 PC
User Score
5.6

Mixed or average reviews- based on 58 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 23 out of 58
  2. Mixed: 15 out of 58
  3. Negative: 20 out of 58

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. MahaVoodoo
    Aug 9, 2019
    4
    Игра имела все шансы стать горячо любимой смесью захватывающей боёвки и увлекательного конструктора, но стала лишь обителью подсевших на гринд ММО-♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ов и школоты (за редким исключением).

    Причинами, на мой взгляд, являются ошибочные решения в области игрового дизайна, наиболее вопиющими, среди которых, являются: 1. Отсутствие скилозависимости игрового процесса. В Crossout    Игра имела все шансы стать горячо любимой смесью захватывающей боёвки и увлекательного конструктора, но стала лишь обителью подсевших на гринд ММО-♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ов и школоты (за редким исключением).

    Причинами, на мой взгляд, являются ошибочные решения в области игрового дизайна, наиболее вопиющими, среди которых, являются:

    1. Отсутствие скилозависимости игрового процесса.

    В Crossout было интересно играть на низких ОМах, где бои в основном происходят на пулемётах, легких дробовиках и пушках, но с прогрессией игрок видит в боях всё меньше и меньше смысла. Зачем учиться стрелять, конструировать машину, если любому однокнопочному раку достаточно врезаться в тебя копьями из стелса, заспамить самонаводящимися ураганами с конца карты (не имея даже прямой видимости и надобности захватить цель), забросать дронами, бомбами на колёсах и т.д.? Такой бессмысленный геймплей заставит опустить руки даже самого ярого фаната.

    2. Ошибочная система матчмейкинга.

    Закрыв глаза на бессмысленный однокнопочный геймплей, можно попытаться удариться в конструирование, но очень скоро раскроется его печальная суть – инженерия сводится к формуле “повесь легендарную/релик пушку на белые-синие детали и го педобирить”. Проблема легко решается ограничением по цвету оружия. Надел легендарку – будь добр драться с такими же как ты.

    Проблема была бы не такой вопиющей, если бы не следующий момент, а именно…

    3. Пропасть в гринде между фиолетом и легендаркой.

    Начиная ОМов эдак с 6000, человек понимает, что для более-менее честного боя ему потребуется 2-3 легендарных оружия, но чтобы скрафтить/купить каких-нибудь пару Цунами, от него требуется немыслимый гринд.

    Таким образом, алчность Geijin и скудность фантазии Targem даёт следующий выхлоп уже через сотню-другую часов:

    1. Нескилозависимый, медленный недошутер, где команда должна перемещаться стадом, чтобы как-то защититься от копейщиков и комбайнов, состязаясь с противоположной командой в матерстве однокнопочного спама.

    2. Отсутствие шутерной составляющей НЕ компенсируется какой-либо ролевой глубиной, как это сделано в популярных MOBA и MMO. Даже пяток скилов и десяток классов уже создают интерес в обыгрывании друг друга за счёт кулдаунов, последовательности и комбинации применённых скилов. Но, к сожалению, не в случае Crossout.

    3. Отсутствие ощутимой прогрессии, кроме немного улучшенных версий уже существующего оружия, которые можно заработать не чаще раза в несколько месяцев при здоровом темпе игры по паре часов в день и которые не способны создать мотивацию для гринда.    … Expand
  2. Snollygoster
    Sep 14, 2018
    4
    I have found the political theme for this program is based around how a Socialist or Communist programmer would write code.. In other words, you really don't have options or good choices to make, and there really isn't that much of a story line to this program. It's just a shoot'em up. The mechanics, graphics, and the smoothness of play are good, even for the extra dumb bots that areI have found the political theme for this program is based around how a Socialist or Communist programmer would write code.. In other words, you really don't have options or good choices to make, and there really isn't that much of a story line to this program. It's just a shoot'em up. The mechanics, graphics, and the smoothness of play are good, even for the extra dumb bots that are added to keep the sides even. However, the methods for progression rank very low, and the acquiring of certain materials reminds me of a lot of games that are just not appealing anymore. The programmer has incorporated a market where players are to sell and buy other players items, however, it has it's quirks and doesn't seem to work very well. I ask myself, why even have this type of market with player interaction? Put up a plain store with ALL the items available for buying and selling and leave the players out of trying to auction off their stuff. Too much overhead in the code, and slows down the front end of the game. However, getting into the missions, each scenario is very fast paced (team against team). A player can get into trouble fast when the sharks start to circle, and the missions usually last only about 2-3 minutes. Possibly if there were more players on the field, the game would move a little slower, but I find each mission is being supplemented with bots because there aren't enough real players taking the field. Not to say the bots programming is not very good, but they are predictable, When a melee occurs, the bots will come out on the bottom as cannon fodder. But, when it does come to head on combat, I have found that the damage from some of the weaponry is over exaggerated in many cases, and the game does not account for how well a vehicle is actually constructed. Instead, each piece is given a mass rating and doesn't really matter if the coder didn't take any engineering courses in stress of materials, the pieces all fall off when hit by a shot that over powers that one pieces critical mass. This takes away from the game. I have found that a strong vehicle that uses more weld points, isn't any better off than one strung out a mile long that has each item only attached by two weld points. And since we are talking construction and materials, I find the game doesn't address deflection points, or angles of attack. Or, maybe it does, but the players never see how well this type of defense works, or not, because the data provided after each mission is very limited. Anyway, I have found multiple bugs in the game, and I do like the fast pace of the battles, just not fond of losing to the unbalanced siding generated by the computer.… Expand
  3. BestNoob
    Feb 18, 2020
    0
    Pay2Win

    No MM, no balance, no team play, trolling, toxic people, cheater/glitcher
    Not worth anything. DONT WASTE ur TIME with it !

    Closed Alpha = Fun
    Closed Beta = Crap
    Actual State = Trash
  4. slik2000
    Dec 30, 2018
    0
    just had 95% of my gear deleted after putting hundreds of hours in because i didnt want to pay for packs, dont even bother with this scam
  5. Deaden84
    Oct 24, 2017
    3
    Game design built on a nice idea. But, there is many reason to ruin this game. I first time saw in a game there is legit aim bot logic. You don't have to aim, or push to button to shot. Just run with your fast vehicle on the around of map and drop your drones. Drones DPS are too much powerful to kill any opponent in a few seconds. DRONES, that's helping players without aiming to shot. It'sGame design built on a nice idea. But, there is many reason to ruin this game. I first time saw in a game there is legit aim bot logic. You don't have to aim, or push to button to shot. Just run with your fast vehicle on the around of map and drop your drones. Drones DPS are too much powerful to kill any opponent in a few seconds. DRONES, that's helping players without aiming to shot. It's unbelievable but people are running with drones than usual weapon system. "Game of drones" I heard people call this game now. It's sad.… Expand
  6. Artisan33
    Dec 1, 2017
    0
    P2W,false developers, terrible balance, extortion of money and with each patch of this more and more. With each patch your hangar will decrease by 2000-3000 + - gold coins. I do not advise you to pay for it.
  7. R6_BLITZ
    Nov 29, 2020
    0
    Spam ad talling more about That game
    Donut Donut wat I can say about "game"
  8. thepes
    Nov 28, 2020
    4
    4/10

    /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
  9. sems
    Jul 12, 2023
    0
    One of the worst, most embarrassing video games I've ever played. It was free and I still feel like I want a refund.
  10. Deaden
    Feb 21, 2020
    2
    The reasons of negative review:
    1. Every game can have some p2w elements or selling some decorations to support DEVs. But this game is a heavy p2w game. Everytime you play in this game, you realize there is more p2w elements shows up like paying to buy seasonal levels to finish these event in one day! This game is like a joke!
    2. Making things harder to play to hold things for future    The reasons of negative review:
    1. Every game can have some p2w elements or selling some decorations to support DEVs. But this game is a heavy p2w game. Everytime you play in this game, you realize there is more p2w elements shows up like paying to buy seasonal levels to finish these event in one day! This game is like a joke!

    2. Making things harder to play to hold things for future behind of payment wall. Many years ago, earning reputation a bit better than now. You could do leveling progress better with factions. But then, they nerfed reputation gaining and started to sell premium payment to get more reputation. You see? they are kind of swindlers.

    3. I'm not saying we shouldn't pay any real money and leave them without supporting. But their intend is totally wrong with morality. I personally purchased few stuff back then when I was believing to support them. If I had a choice to take time back I wouldn't! Some games deserve to be supported but some of them are not!

    4. The other thing is making PvE elements to make impossible to play. They nerfed many benefits for players each time for years. They are making raids harder and harder each day in one purpose is forcing players to pay for p2w elements to get stronger. It's a psychology dealing with players. If players feel powerless, they will spent more money. Is it right or wrong? In my case it shouldn't be like this way to try to deceive players to pay for their p2w services. It's wrong in morality way. Check Path of Exile and Warframe, how they are successful in their own game as a Free to Play.

    My decision is, never start to play this game to get addict. It will make your life more stressful than before in any game. I'm not recommend it!    … Expand
  11. Azim0ff
    Feb 5, 2020
    1
    Very nice concept spoiled by the greed - progression is simply too slow.

    CONSTRUCTOR: To get to the promised "freedom" of construction one need months worth of playtime, until then he's stuck with most common parts. GAMAPLAY: Devs seem to favor cannon players, so literally any other weapon is either in disadvantage relative to cannons, or is nerfed/reworked until it is. Also if    Very nice concept spoiled by the greed - progression is simply too slow.

    CONSTRUCTOR:
    To get to the promised "freedom" of construction one need months worth of playtime, until then he's stuck with most common parts.

    GAMAPLAY:
    Devs seem to favor cannon players, so literally any other weapon is either in disadvantage relative to cannons, or is nerfed/reworked until it is.

    Also if there are hovers, legs, invisibility, protective fields, perks, and so on, then where are Elves?    … Expand
  12. jija
    Sep 10, 2020
    1
    Бездарнейшая поделка. После Ex Machina, Targem games игры не делала, издатель кроссаута этому еще одно подтверждение.
    Игра позиционировала себя как ММО в которой ты можешь творить, разнообразие деталей, режимы, сказка. В реальности 99% игроков - это 2-3 мета-крафта, отходить от которых не имеет смысла, невменяемый гринд, отвратительное PvP, сервера - пара ноутов.
    Единственное что    Бездарнейшая поделка. После Ex Machina, Targem games игры не делала, издатель кроссаута этому еще одно подтверждение.
    Игра позиционировала себя как ММО в которой ты можешь творить, разнообразие деталей, режимы, сказка. В реальности 99% игроков - это 2-3 мета-крафта, отходить от которых не имеет смысла, невменяемый гринд, отвратительное PvP, сервера - пара ноутов.
    Единственное что понравилось, PvE режим "Пробуждение"    … Expand
  13. andarion
    Aug 26, 2021
    0
    Installs Torrent software that won't uninstall when uninstalling the game and can't be removed without messing with the registry
  14. sharky0456
    Jan 8, 2023
    2
    honestly just play World of tanks instead youl have a lot more fun before you realise that game is p2w too

    sorry

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
tbd

No score yet - based on 2 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 2 out of 2
  2. Mixed: 0 out of 2
  3. Negative: 0 out of 2
  1. CD-Action
    Jul 6, 2018
    80
    A doubtlessly original title that offers a lot of fun through very extensive options of building, customizing and optimizing vehicles but could benefit from faster progression. [06/2018, p.52]
  2. PC Games
    Feb 28, 2018
    75
    There’s a lot to like about Crossout: the vehicular action shooter combines fast gameplay with a really good editor and a solid crafting system. The graphics are good and the damage model is even better. Sadly, there is no crafting tutorial, the background story is rather weak and most of the time the AI is disappointingly stupid.
    Read full review