Chrome

1. Musickiller

   Jun 19, 2013

   10

   Singleplayer is nice. You may die on normal if you play it first time, but after time hardest will be not enough! But not SP is what I want toSingleplayer is nice. You may die on normal if you play it first time, but after time hardest will be not enough! But not SP is what I want to tell you about.
   Multiplayer is AMAZING! Yes, last days there are not many cool inspiring guys online, but you surely sooner or later find some friends among them! This is the best MP FPS I ever played.
   Objectively: guns are VERY balanced. If you have a skill in FPS you can take a pistol and make a massacre all over server! Of course you can always take 14mm automatic rifle and be a bad guy with a big gun … Expand

   • 1 of 3 users found this helpful
2. Dr_Vladmir

   Apr 27, 2020

   10

   The game holds the bar for quality. For 2003, the graphics and sound are excellent. The gameplay is amazing, the weapons are diverse, theThe game holds the bar for quality. For 2003, the graphics and sound are excellent. The gameplay is amazing, the weapons are diverse, the environment is well-designed. The game keeps pace well and does not let you get bored, the balance of action and calm is observed. Yes, and with no complicated manipulations, the game works in 1080p with a good rendering range. In the aggregate of these points I am making such an assessment.… Expand

   • 0 of 0 users found this helpful
4. ErikDeV.

   Sep 24, 2003

   9

   Mostly brilliant? except for some minor sound and animation issues? Borrows gameplay elements from Deus-ex, Halo and Half-Life but still has Mostly brilliant? except for some minor sound and animation issues? Borrows gameplay elements from Deus-ex, Halo and Half-Life but still has it?s own identity! I am enjoying this game immensely! What are you waiting for? Add this game to your collection. You will not regret it! … Expand

   • 1 of 3 users found this helpful
5. QuitBeingStupid

   Nov 5, 2013

   7

   Graphics are dated, but good enough, espcially for a $5 (or less) game. A decent storyline that gives you a long enough quest chain to makeGraphics are dated, but good enough, espcially for a $5 (or less) game. A decent storyline that gives you a long enough quest chain to make you feel like you got your worth. Variety of weaponry isn't somewhat basic, but the amount able to be carried allows for enough diversity to be carried. Also the stealth feature and vehicle driving are well done too.
   Overall a solid 7.… Expand

   • 0 of 1 users found this helpful
6. BrianW.

   Oct 3, 2003

   7

   Truly stunning graphics. A couple of bugs here and there, and a few glitches. A.I is a bit hit and miss but otherwise an excelent chioce for Truly stunning graphics. A couple of bugs here and there, and a few glitches. A.I is a bit hit and miss but otherwise an excelent chioce for fps addicts. … Expand

   • 1 of 3 users found this helpful
7. keefbaker

   Oct 20, 2013

   6

   Truly cheesy characters, graphics from 2002, the game itself actually feels like it should have been released 7 years prior and really wantsTruly cheesy characters, graphics from 2002, the game itself actually feels like it should have been released 7 years prior and really wants to be deus ex but can't quite pull it off. That said, it's not entirely unplayable it's just isn't quite there.… Expand

   • 0 of 0 users found this helpful
8. x2495iiii

   Jan 23, 2014

   0

   I never thought I'd see a game make shooting bad guys completely unfun. But then came Chrome. Here's a rundown of my first twenty or soI never thought I'd see a game make shooting bad guys completely unfun. But then came Chrome. Here's a rundown of my first twenty or so attempts to beat the first mission on normal difficulty.
   
   (First time): got killed by the second group of enemies I ran into. Dying is very easy due to high enemy accuracy and a crappy, slow healing meachanic.
   
   (Second time): mission was cancelled by my prima donna commander, who won't progress unless I'm holding his hand.
   
   (Third time): killed commander as revenge for cancelling the mission. (Fourth time): commander died because a million guys rushed his position, and I could only kill all but two of them. Good to know he can handle himself in a fight.
   
   (Fifth - twentieth times): repeats of one of the first four. You're not allowed to do your own thing at any point in this sequence, even if it means completing the mission faster or more safely. You have to follow Commander Uptight's orders or he'll cancel the mission. And when that means staying in a tower with limited ammo and no way of switching to a different weapon or restocking when you're out, your options are die from disobedience or die from letting your commander eat it.
   
   The gameplay itself is decent enough. I dislike the way my bullets, even when very carefully aimed, seem to whiz right past my enemies. I also dislike the fact that my enemies are bullet sponges with Olympic marksmanship skills. The worst part is definitely the commander and his ridiculous "orders", though. When a game literally kills you and makes you start the whole level over (no saves or checkpoints) for not playing it the way it wants to be played, it's not really a game so much as an electronic to-do list, and that is most certainly not my idea of fun.
   
   I gave it one last chance, and I died from friendly fire. Yeah, this game's putrid. Don't bother with it.… Expand

   • 2 of 3 users found this helpful

See all 18 User Reviews