Call of Duty: Ghosts

 PC
User Score
2.3

Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 3604 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 474 out of 3604
  2. Mixed: 384 out of 3604
  3. Negative: 2,746 out of 3604
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. karmasleeper
    Nov 5, 2013
    1
    4gb of RAM user here. I had to get a crack from some Russian kid to play SP. SP is your typical follow this NPC and do whatever he tells you uninspired crap. Set pieces look neat but 6gb of RAM? Nothing I have seen so far justifies this system requirement. Can't play MP but it's probably not that terrible. Battlefield 4 is a game with larger maps, dynamic destruction, vehicles, more4gb of RAM user here. I had to get a crack from some Russian kid to play SP. SP is your typical follow this NPC and do whatever he tells you uninspired crap. Set pieces look neat but 6gb of RAM? Nothing I have seen so far justifies this system requirement. Can't play MP but it's probably not that terrible. Battlefield 4 is a game with larger maps, dynamic destruction, vehicles, more players on screen at any given time, better animations, and only requires 4gb of RAM. Last Call of Duty I buy.… Expand
  2. Badrebel
    Nov 8, 2013
    1
    So disappointing!!! Poor graphics, arcade gameplay. Bad storyline and you´ll finish it within 5-6 hours.
    Multiplayer is as everytime very bad. I just can´t tell you who Cod Ghosts needs almost 35 GB Hard Disc Space, it looks like a game from 2009. I´m so disappointed.
  3. Grenodeur
    Nov 6, 2013
    0
    Everything is very bad. Graphics terrible, besides, the game is limited to 91 frames per second, I am the owner of 120 HZ monitor can not play that at 120 FPS. In black ops graphics were much better and everything worked smoothly, but here, there are subsidence of up to 50 frames at Geforse GTX 680! Worst game in history. If the battlefield sold in Steam I would have played in it and notEverything is very bad. Graphics terrible, besides, the game is limited to 91 frames per second, I am the owner of 120 HZ monitor can not play that at 120 FPS. In black ops graphics were much better and everything worked smoothly, but here, there are subsidence of up to 50 frames at Geforse GTX 680! Worst game in history. If the battlefield sold in Steam I would have played in it and not in a misunderstanding!… Expand
  4. ri888ff
    Nov 5, 2013
    0
    Terrible graphics, terrible gameplay, stupid gamestory and 6gb ram as minimum, are you crazy, Activision? Looks like stupid joke. My vote for a new Battlefield!
  5. mviski
    Nov 5, 2013
    0
    bad story, bad graphic, bad game...this is sh*t! Na meg csak lehúzás az egész, 1 forintot nem ér...csak gratulálok annak a butának aki megveszi még a COD-ot...rémes a játék, adom is el azonnal...BF4 ezerszer jobb!
  6. viashesla
    Nov 5, 2013
    0
    The graphics are even worse than the transition from Cod 2 to 3. I am so glad I didn't buy any of the map packs or expansions. This will be the last CoD I ever buy. I mean honestly PayDay 2 has better graphics. I thought it would be cool that you could customize a character and become a woman. I think thats the only improvement this game has made.

    dronos Nov 5, 2013 0 Hell yeah i    The graphics are even worse than the transition from Cod 2 to 3. I am so glad I didn't buy any of the map packs or expansions. This will be the last CoD I ever buy. I mean honestly PayDay 2 has better graphics. I thought it would be cool that you could customize a character and become a woman. I think thats the only improvement this game has made.

    dronos
    Nov 5, 2013
    0
    Hell yeah i have 16GB Ram and had no problems with installation andor requirements. But... BUTT!
    Same game from greedy guys. Made game for consoles not for PC. I can't even name that "shooter" no aim, small maps, no skill.
    Wont buy any "CoD" games anymore.
    his is a step back from Black Ops 2 in almost every way. No FoV slider on PC version, or FPS cap setting, both of which were present in BO2. Bugs in MW3 that were addressed in BO2 are now somehow back in Ghosts, for example the random jumps in mouse sensitivity that happen if certain programs are running in the background (such as FRAPs). Theater mode, one of the best features of recent Call of Duty games, has been removed. Optimization wise, my computer runs Battlefield 4 on max settings at higher frame rates than Ghosts. Image quality defaults to 'high', which causes upscaling of resolution like a console game rather than rendering at your chosen resolution. Sound effects sound like they were taken straight from MW3. Sad.    … Expand
  7. V1R2L
    Nov 5, 2013
    0
    They say THIS IS NEW GENERATION! NEW ENGINE!1 And then they release THIS game... Guys, we live in 2013 year, and maximum fps
    locked at 91?lolwut?! It looks pathetic on my 144hz monitor Battlefield 4 has a much more beautiful
    graphics and much bigger world I have more than 300 FPS! (3960x gtx 690 32Gb ram) Aaaand FOV locked at 65... CoD looks soooo awful... Not to mention sound, which    They say THIS IS NEW GENERATION! NEW ENGINE!1 And then they release THIS game... Guys, we live in 2013 year, and maximum fps
    locked at 91?lolwut?! It looks pathetic on my 144hz monitor Battlefield 4 has a much more beautiful
    graphics and much bigger world I have more than 300 FPS! (3960x gtx 690 32Gb ram) Aaaand FOV locked at 65... CoD looks
    soooo awful... Not to mention sound, which feels like it was made on some prehistoric synth. My score 0    … Expand
  8. chaosquall
    Nov 5, 2013
    0
    Graphics are terrible, even worse then cod wow i would say. Players randomly teliport, the menu stutters cant even play single player because the cut scenes crash the game. Not optimized at all. They should be shot.

    If i can play bf4 maxed 60+ fps i should be able to play this pile of crap!
  9. Scootinfruity
    Nov 8, 2013
    0
    Call of Duty Ghosts takes a step back in terms of graphical fidelity and overall gameplay and story. The story is VERY bland, the Gameplay is of your typical Run-Of-The-Mill shooter, and the Graphics are WORSE than Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2, a game which was released in 2009. Not to mention, the game Copy/Pastes a scene from Modern Warfare 2, frame for frame. The game was very lazilyCall of Duty Ghosts takes a step back in terms of graphical fidelity and overall gameplay and story. The story is VERY bland, the Gameplay is of your typical Run-Of-The-Mill shooter, and the Graphics are WORSE than Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2, a game which was released in 2009. Not to mention, the game Copy/Pastes a scene from Modern Warfare 2, frame for frame. The game was very lazily put together and it's nice to see this already dying franchise finally be being put to rest. The Call of Duty series has turned into shovelware and I think it's finally time for Activision to let it go. Unfortunately, I can't give this game a good score. There isn't a single good thing about it. The multiplayer is buggy, the Performance is TERRIBLE, and overall, it's a very bad game. It's a shame to see a once great series die, but I think it's time to put it to rest anyway.… Expand
  10. spectralknight
    Nov 8, 2013
    0
    I will give a 0 to this game.Why?Because this game is 0 for me.I can't play it at all...I have 20 frames on low settings.Anyway it doesn't matter if I'm on low or extra settings because I have almost the same frame rate.This is simply not a PC game.If you turn the graphics lower than EXTRA this game looks like a 2000 game.I recommend this game not to be played less than extra otherwise youI will give a 0 to this game.Why?Because this game is 0 for me.I can't play it at all...I have 20 frames on low settings.Anyway it doesn't matter if I'm on low or extra settings because I have almost the same frame rate.This is simply not a PC game.If you turn the graphics lower than EXTRA this game looks like a 2000 game.I recommend this game not to be played less than extra otherwise you will have a bad image quality so you would better play any 2006 game because it looks better than this,honestly.My specs are 8 GB RAM,1 TB HDD,AMD Phenom II X6 1090T and AMD6850 X2 Edition OC.With those specs I can't get more than 20 frames.Also I think this is my last cod game for me...Battlefield is much better than this which is just a garbage with the same engine from quake.I think I said all.This game is 0 for me.… Expand
  11. czirrfb
    Nov 8, 2013
    1
    Buy Battlefield 4 instead!

    Seriously. This game is a joke. It constantly crashes and has frame rate issues and yet BF4 looks about 5 times better and runs smoother. This game was clearly made for console with the sole purpose of racking in cash. At least DICE are trying new things and advancing their series forward. We have been playing the exact same CoD game since Modern Warfare 2.    Buy Battlefield 4 instead!

    Seriously. This game is a joke. It constantly crashes and has frame rate issues and yet BF4 looks about 5 times better and runs smoother.

    This game was clearly made for console with the sole purpose of racking in cash. At least DICE are trying new things and advancing their series forward. We have been playing the exact same CoD game since Modern Warfare 2. Even the graphics remain the same.

    Its safe to say I will not be buying another CoD game. I hope Titan Fall is good...    … Expand
  12. Viedmalakian435
    Nov 8, 2013
    0
    Cómo juzgar al juego con mayor requerimiento de recursos cuando su tecnología está tan por debajo de la media?, es más. con la cantidad de ingresos que obtiene, no es capaz de ofrecer una optimización en PC que no de vergüenza?, Battlefield 4 (o cual quier otro) que triplica en tecnología a este titulo no requiere ni un tercio de recursos, empezando por un sistema de 64 bits...Cómo juzgar al juego con mayor requerimiento de recursos cuando su tecnología está tan por debajo de la media?, es más. con la cantidad de ingresos que obtiene, no es capaz de ofrecer una optimización en PC que no de vergüenza?, Battlefield 4 (o cual quier otro) que triplica en tecnología a este titulo no requiere ni un tercio de recursos, empezando por un sistema de 64 bits... decepcionante...… Expand
  13. killerbake
    Nov 8, 2013
    0
    This game runs terrible. I can load up BO2 which looks more graphically pleasing then this and it runs smooth. Load this up and I feel like I'm in 2000 watching my pc chug trying to run this.

    Animations for the dog are sometimes terrible. Like he just floats down stairs. (so next gen!) Not only that, but they raised the specs on the pc for no reason to force ignorant people to buy    This game runs terrible. I can load up BO2 which looks more graphically pleasing then this and it runs smooth. Load this up and I feel like I'm in 2000 watching my pc chug trying to run this.

    Animations for the dog are sometimes terrible. Like he just floats down stairs. (so next gen!)

    Not only that, but they raised the specs on the pc for no reason to force ignorant people to buy console versions. Infinity Ward, I'm sorry but no more. Treyarch is king of COD.    … Expand
  14. dilligaf_uk
    Nov 8, 2013
    1
    Monumental crap, graphics are terrible but the download was 30Gb, that's like the game coming on 6 DVDs. Not sure what is included in that when the game looks so shocking.

    Best advice, avoid. Things like Metro: Last Light show what PCs are really capable of
  15. hastalavistazia
    Nov 8, 2013
    4
    I do not recommend this game to noone. It is just waste of money. As single player is much more collorated then it could be that multi is much worst then other CoD tittles. Game just sucks in reality fighting. You can still be knifed out after sending few bullets to enemys chest
  16. HammerLee
    Nov 11, 2013
    0
    Utter disappointment. Cannot play the game without it crashing every 30 seconds. My machine is top-spec, 16GB of RAM, latest drivers etc. Rubbish. Get a patch out pronto!
  17. wowsers
    Nov 11, 2013
    0
    Worst game i've played in 14 years of gaming. So badly optimized for the PC that they should be ashamed. I have a gaming rig and it won't even run properly. I gave it a 1. Never ever again!!!
  18. iHadToWriteAUse
    Nov 14, 2013
    0
    Unplayable.
    The graphics looks like something from COD MW1, i mean the badness of the textures are amazing and do not get me started on the microstuddering. I regret using time and money on this and I will not be continuing with the COD franchise
  19. inox
    Nov 17, 2013
    1
    Bad networkind, no antihack system and the game is FULL of hackers, badly designed maps, game looks 2005-ish and i think this should be the end of infinity ward
  20. warren024
    Nov 18, 2013
    1
    Crappiest console port to date. A total disappointment. As a developer, I would be ashamed to release a game in this state.

    The good: Single player mode is about what you would expect from the Call of Duty series and is actually not terrible. The bad: Everything else. PC gamers buy CoD games for the multi-player online action. And this is really really bad. If you can configure    Crappiest console port to date. A total disappointment. As a developer, I would be ashamed to release a game in this state.

    The good: Single player mode is about what you would expect from the Call of Duty series and is actually not terrible.

    The bad: Everything else. PC gamers buy CoD games for the multi-player online action. And this is really really bad. If you can configure the game to run smoothly on your system you will still get hiccups in the starting menus, no matter what you do), you then have the joy of mostly playing on non-dedicated servers... what does this mean? Yeah, the old IW net gaming system that was shoved down our throats. The lag more often than not ruins this game. How bad is the lag? So bad, they include NO PING METER in game. The default setting in your config file allows you to join games so long as your ping is under 800 ms. Yes 800. There are no FOV settings, so you are stuck at the standard 65. Want to turn off music in game? Sorry, the only audio setting available is volume.

    Thanks for the console game on my computer guys. A total lack of effort gets you the score you deserve.    … Expand
  21. Azzazz
    May 1, 2014
    0
    Terrible game, just another failure in the COD franchise. Reused assests, unoptimised, looks terrible and dated when it first came out. And they call themselves AAA, pfft, they're just hocking off the same old **** year after year for $110.
  22. BFM
    Aug 15, 2014
    3
    -Unplayable and unpleasant-

    So let's get that out of the way: The Singleplayer mode is quite entertaining. Nothing special, but better than in other modern CoD games. But the multiplayer is where all the problems are. - No real dedicated servers (You can't select which server you want to join, you can't rent them, can't modify them, cant moderate them, can't see them, can't feel    -Unplayable and unpleasant-

    So let's get that out of the way: The Singleplayer mode is quite entertaining.
    Nothing special, but better than in other modern CoD games.

    But the multiplayer is where all the problems are.

    - No real dedicated servers (You can't select which server you want to join, you can't rent them, can't modify them, cant moderate them, can't see them, can't feel them.)

    In this regard, Infinity Ward are plain liars.

    - terrible lags (I think others confuse them to be caused by lag compensation, but it's just regular good old lags. Get used to being shot dead at the frame you see the opponent the first time.)

    - umpleasant host migration

    - bad spawning position

    - prone is broken (You mostly can't go into prone or can't aim or move while in prone. Every small polygone around you seems to block you in this regard.)

    - losing complete conenction to a session (and by that all the unsaved kills and XP)

    - any teammate running near/next to you will block your movement, forcing you to go the wrong direction, simulating a really bad lag

    - your framerate can drop from a steady 90fps to a screen frozen for 3 seconds ramdomly at every moment

    - the "physics" are so bad, you constantly outcry in disbelief that what just happened made the the ragdoll behave like it did. Golden Eye 64 had more realistic looking deaths.

    - the Ripper (DLC weapon) feels like pay-2-win

    - your menu can have heavy, randome slowdowns

    - the audio is suttering

    - your mouse feels like it's skipping over the screen

    Even on a power-beast of a computer, this game runs like it's the leaked beta of Crysis 5.

    But the Graphics actually don't look that bad if you turn everything on ultra.
    It sure is o Battlefield 3, but I think it looks much better than Counter Strike : Global Offensive.

    It's really a shame, because if all those problems weren't, this game would have some nice multiplayer, and I would give it a 8/10.
    I really love the maps, the weapons and items, the mechanics and balancing, the game mods and timing. But it's just not playable. And Infinity Ward doesn't care about that. The game is out, they made some small patches, defended their lies and released some expensive DLC. Now they moved to their next project, leaving behind the idiots whom bought this game.

    This was the first CoD by Infinity Ward that I've bought.
    This was the last CoD by Infinity Ward that I've bought.
    I was an idiot.    … Expand
  23. F4t3r
    Nov 5, 2013
    0
    Is the same game Is the copy of call of duty black ops 2 and the graphics cant compete with battlefield bad company To the game I give a 3.5 points .

    PD Im from Argentina
  24. contract
    Nov 6, 2013
    0
    Not worth your time. 3+ year old graphics, yet it runs sluggish on a beast system. The game play is terrible, the team play is terrible, the story line is contrived, and obviously most of the props were reused from past games.
  25. d4rkbr
    Nov 7, 2013
    0
    Well, I paid 110 R$ for a game that I can not play, because I do not have 6GB of RAM, cool Activi$ion you outdid yourself. I'll keep playing COD 4 which is much better than this crap.
  26. apoc
    Nov 7, 2013
    0
    The worst cod i have ever player, so under optimised, direct console port, plays so much worse than BO2, the style, system, hud, controls, gameplay, guns are all inferior and frankly awful in general. A mess of a game is an understatement. DO NOT BUY.
  27. NANOX
    Nov 5, 2013
    3
    Fish AI? We already have that in MARIO 64... Dogs AI? We already have that in Shadow Dancer...
    So whats the point of buy this game again? none... just another Generic FPS.
    Save your money, this title its worthless
  28. DreadRock
    Nov 6, 2013
    0
    6 gb RAM and DirectX 11 for THIS? -Pfff... Garbage Garbage Garbage Garbage Garbage Garbage Garbage Garbage Garbage Garbage Garbage Garbage Garbage Garbage Garbage
  29. aurathekitty
    Nov 6, 2013
    0
    This game was unsurprisingly rubbish. The optimization of the graphics was bad, frame rate was bad, Riley the dog was the most uninteresting dog of all time and the multiplayer has gone backwards! The rank system with the guns has been better thought out but come on, they put 100 million dollars onto the table, for a 4 hour average campaign? You still have to wait for everyone to runThis game was unsurprisingly rubbish. The optimization of the graphics was bad, frame rate was bad, Riley the dog was the most uninteresting dog of all time and the multiplayer has gone backwards! The rank system with the guns has been better thought out but come on, they put 100 million dollars onto the table, for a 4 hour average campaign? You still have to wait for everyone to run through their scripts until they breach the door? Like come on, ain't nobody got time for that!… Expand
  30. evan002
    Nov 7, 2013
    0
    I have never been this disappointed in a game ever. If I had a 3rd hand I would give this game 3 tumbs down 1) I cannot believe that they would release a game of this magnitude on the PC and have it be as buggy as it is. Weapon Texture Flickering (WTF!!!!) half of everything on my screen looked like a strobe light. The only way I could fix this was to disable Sli, which sucks because II have never been this disappointed in a game ever. If I had a 3rd hand I would give this game 3 tumbs down 1) I cannot believe that they would release a game of this magnitude on the PC and have it be as buggy as it is. Weapon Texture Flickering (WTF!!!!) half of everything on my screen looked like a strobe light. The only way I could fix this was to disable Sli, which sucks because I loose a lot of my performance. FPS drop all the damn time, this game is going from 60fps to 10fps all the time. And I haven't been able to fix that issue at all. 2) Story line is like every other CoD game out there and the overall feel seems like a 2009 release. 3) worst damn online play I have ever played in a CoD game, every problem with the single player campaign on a handful of maps you've seen in all the modern war far games with different colors.… Expand
  31. Tumpah
    Nov 5, 2013
    0
    wrost cod ever, and maybe wrost payed fps on the market. its waste of money... really i read reviews like ign wtf!!?? and... money, money its the answer!!
  32. ProCritic4ever
    Nov 6, 2013
    0
    Big disappointment! Terrible game, not only that the demands are high and the optimization of evil. CoD should have come to an end after this section. I bought BF 4 and I do not regret the purchase, but also bought CoD: Ghost and I very much regret, never to chop.
  33. Ahmedtoni
    Nov 6, 2013
    0
    are you freaking kidding me?!!
    the game is not even playable!

    lame graphics lame story line lame multiplayer. can't believe i wasted my money on that crap

    stupid dog woof woof fukin idiots you fuked up the game

    R.I.P COD 2003-2013
  34. quakecanada
    Nov 15, 2013
    0
    I know I don't have the reputation on here to leave a report where you must believe what I say, but I assure you that this game is pure garbage. I have enjoyed playing many video games and this is at the bottom of my list. The game is a resource hog and has nothing special about it, under Audio there is one setting, just one, a slider that goes back and forth. You are forced to listen toI know I don't have the reputation on here to leave a report where you must believe what I say, but I assure you that this game is pure garbage. I have enjoyed playing many video games and this is at the bottom of my list. The game is a resource hog and has nothing special about it, under Audio there is one setting, just one, a slider that goes back and forth. You are forced to listen to background music and stupid voices while playing. There are so many little things that are totally off that it is now shock to the player that when you actually play the game you are forced to look for what is good about the game. I am so disappointed and this company will never see a pre-order from me again. The match making system is horrible as well, you sit in que and wait and wait for a game. The squads wargame was a good idea for beginners but it failed after 1 week of no one using it. I would have rather had a cool normal game that this fancy resource hog that had figured out a way to make it incredibly user unfriendly.… Expand
  35. LMSPECTRO
    Nov 22, 2013
    0
    COD: GHOSTS, the game is very confusing in multiplayer, leaves much to be desired because it breaks a lot to share with those giant maps, 6 vs. 6 is not a good option for these maps, this makes the player experience the horrible, not to mention the lack of compliance with the Brazilians who bought the game on PC and did not have voice acting, infinity ward and activision this game even.COD: GHOSTS, the game is very confusing in multiplayer, leaves much to be desired because it breaks a lot to share with those giant maps, 6 vs. 6 is not a good option for these maps, this makes the player experience the horrible, not to mention the lack of compliance with the Brazilians who bought the game on PC and did not have voice acting, infinity ward and activision this game even.
      Not to mention I did not say the crazy respawn game that makes you sometimes born and die, to be born in the wrong places, the campaign mode is fairly weak, easily the most in the console and pc version, this game showed that deserves attention not players, if you never played cod before stay away from ghosts, throw the past but did not get the ghosts at all.    … Expand
  36. KennyP
    Nov 14, 2013
    0
    I was skeptical about the incredibly low user ratings for this game, so I went ahead and bought it anyway based on the decent critic reviews, especially from IGN. Well shame on them. This game is abysmal. Without doubt the worst shooter I have ever played on PC.

    Visually it's ok in some areas, and terrible in others. The gameplay is woeful. NPCs push you along corridors, and run in    I was skeptical about the incredibly low user ratings for this game, so I went ahead and bought it anyway based on the decent critic reviews, especially from IGN. Well shame on them. This game is abysmal. Without doubt the worst shooter I have ever played on PC.

    Visually it's ok in some areas, and terrible in others. The gameplay is woeful. NPCs push you along corridors, and run in front of your line of fire. Chunks of exploding concrete fly right through you. It literally feels like you're not in the game. As if no one else is aware that you're even there. Quite frankly abysmal.

    Technically it's a shambles as well. SLI is broken, and frame rates are all over the place. Even the level intro scenes are stuttering and dropping audio. Just raising your gun sight often results in stuttering video and audio.

    As for the dog. LOL. Half the time it looks like it's on a skate board. Terrible animation.

    In summary, this game looks bad, plays bad, and is just plain bad. Any publication giving it more than a 3 is simply not being honest. Next gen?! It looks like a game from 2008 with upgraded textures, and plays like one from...well...your worst nightmare. Do not pour your money down the drain. I have never before now purchased a game and felt like a refund. Call of duty Ghosts is RUBBISH.

    I could keep pouring more vitriol into my keyboard but frankly this POS game has already wasted too much of my time.    … Expand
  37. godmodemario
    Nov 15, 2013
    0
    Did the developers intentionally do the opposite of what the gaming community said they wanted? There will be no new COD games in my library until they AT LEAST bring back a server browser. HCFFA FTW!
  38. SonicAndMegaMan
    Jan 9, 2014
    3
    Another average call of duty games.. to think it would be one of the most glitchy poor quality games off the whole series. I'll be honest i haven't liked a call of duty game in a long time but playing this on the pc really pissed me off. it's average on the ps3 with the story line copy and pasted from a past cod game. But on the pc it runs so crappy and glitchy it makes for a below averageAnother average call of duty games.. to think it would be one of the most glitchy poor quality games off the whole series. I'll be honest i haven't liked a call of duty game in a long time but playing this on the pc really pissed me off. it's average on the ps3 with the story line copy and pasted from a past cod game. But on the pc it runs so crappy and glitchy it makes for a below average gameplay experience and the plot was copied so no originality there?… Expand
  39. kikmeister
    Nov 10, 2013
    3
    this game is half baked to say the least. the concept and story is sound but their implementation is terrible. my laptop is midrange and is able to run this game. but the game's flaws are too pronounced to forgive. i have tried settings from low to high without much luck. the quality of graphics on this is inferior compared to battlefield 4. black ops 2 was much better polished andthis game is half baked to say the least. the concept and story is sound but their implementation is terrible. my laptop is midrange and is able to run this game. but the game's flaws are too pronounced to forgive. i have tried settings from low to high without much luck. the quality of graphics on this is inferior compared to battlefield 4. black ops 2 was much better polished and implemented even if not as good as battlefield. but at least black ops 2 had more character. despite some recent updates, there is still much lag, stuttering, pixelating, aliasing, etc. the artwork is not even impressive. color appears bland and lifeless. static often heard and cinematic cut scenes even stutter. watching the cut scenes can be unbearable.

    on the bright side the storytelling is good, voice acting is good, and it had some cool action scenes. other than that it is simply over hyped and over priced bloatware that brings down a good franchise. overall, i regret buying this game.    … Expand
  40. slimboss07
    Nov 30, 2013
    0
    Epic failure on all proportions. Never will I buy another POS COD game. I have almost all of them. The hack jobs have made this game completely worthless to me. Activision I hope you see all these comments and know that you will not con people on your next BS game. And 6gb Ram is BS.
  41. DustEater
    Nov 5, 2013
    1
    First of all. 1 point is for a cinematic story. Its boring, americanish style action plot without sense etc. But 1 point because its the only one thing which holds the game.

    Rest. Graphic didnt change since first Modern Warfare. Details which are more and more requiring from our PCs are taken from nowhere. Minimum 6GB RAM? Where game uses only 2GB MAX!? Pixels and pixels everywhere.    First of all. 1 point is for a cinematic story. Its boring, americanish style action plot without sense etc. But 1 point because its the only one thing which holds the game.

    Rest. Graphic didnt change since first Modern Warfare. Details which are more and more requiring from our PCs are taken from nowhere. Minimum 6GB RAM? Where game uses only 2GB MAX!? Pixels and pixels everywhere. Even setting textures and map textures resolution to HIGH or EXTRA dont give the effect, still seeing pixels.
    Freezing sound in movie sequences.

    That's how NEXT GEN game should be looking? IW must be kidding.    … Expand
  42. ShadowXENUS
    Nov 7, 2013
    0
    The size of the game. The system requirements... What is in the game? Is there something better that Battlefield 4 can offer? System crashes, bugs, poor graphics... Looks like the game was created like a Free-to-Play title but creators suddenly decided to create a short campaign mode and start selling the game. No optimization at all! MW1, MW2, BO, BO2, WAW this games are good. GhostsThe size of the game. The system requirements... What is in the game? Is there something better that Battlefield 4 can offer? System crashes, bugs, poor graphics... Looks like the game was created like a Free-to-Play title but creators suddenly decided to create a short campaign mode and start selling the game. No optimization at all! MW1, MW2, BO, BO2, WAW this games are good. Ghosts only a terrible ghost of "Call of Duty".… Expand
  43. John5417
    Nov 5, 2013
    0
    Worst game ever of the franchise. Always loved CoD but Ghosts is a piece of s+++. I'm so sorry developers who worked hard in the game. I hope that improves with patches.
  44. FreeMan4096
    Dec 10, 2013
    0
    Whoever gave this game more than 7 out of 10 is clearly biased, fanboy-hyped, bought off or never played other game than Call of Duty (some young tards that started playing BlackCoks for zombies). Every user that gave this game 10 out of 10 is just trying to lighten up disastrous user score or he's simply completely delusional. This could be rated as average game, but the fact that thisWhoever gave this game more than 7 out of 10 is clearly biased, fanboy-hyped, bought off or never played other game than Call of Duty (some young tards that started playing BlackCoks for zombies). Every user that gave this game 10 out of 10 is just trying to lighten up disastrous user score or he's simply completely delusional. This could be rated as average game, but the fact that this atrocity keeps ruining whole industry deserves 0 out of 10 from passionate gamers.… Expand
  45. MrSoris
    Nov 5, 2013
    3
    I cant recommend this game at all it mostly runs around 45 FPS it has nor FOV slider the gun play is just boring and the graphics are really bad. I would say that Black Ops 2 actually had better graphics and i would even say that Bad Company 2 from 2010(!!!) had better Graphics. The only good thing is that it has 12 different play modes but that's it. If you want a good Mulitplayer FPSI cant recommend this game at all it mostly runs around 45 FPS it has nor FOV slider the gun play is just boring and the graphics are really bad. I would say that Black Ops 2 actually had better graphics and i would even say that Bad Company 2 from 2010(!!!) had better Graphics. The only good thing is that it has 12 different play modes but that's it. If you want a good Mulitplayer FPS right now i would definitely recommend BF4 over this at any day.… Expand
  46. JohnPr
    Nov 15, 2013
    0
    While Treyarch appear to always improve their branch of the CoD franchise, Infinity Ward have consistently dropped the good components and forced the bad into their products. Peer hosted lag-fest. Fixed 65 degree FOV. Misleading directional sound from footsteps. Regular crash to desktop. Ridiculous hardware requirements for a game that looks considerably worse than Crysis from nearly sevenWhile Treyarch appear to always improve their branch of the CoD franchise, Infinity Ward have consistently dropped the good components and forced the bad into their products. Peer hosted lag-fest. Fixed 65 degree FOV. Misleading directional sound from footsteps. Regular crash to desktop. Ridiculous hardware requirements for a game that looks considerably worse than Crysis from nearly seven years ago. Lots of work must have gone into the content of this game, it's a shame to see it let down by such an appalling engine.… Expand
  47. MRGamer
    Feb 23, 2014
    0
    This is my second review after 3 months playing COD Ghosts. Infinity Ward appears surprisingly incompetent, and continues to run this game into the ground. Continued lag and poor optimization, low player base, and cheaters with apparently no fear of the new VAC. This weekend IW put the game on sale and offered a free weekend in anticipation of the DLC release this week. They know theThis is my second review after 3 months playing COD Ghosts. Infinity Ward appears surprisingly incompetent, and continues to run this game into the ground. Continued lag and poor optimization, low player base, and cheaters with apparently no fear of the new VAC. This weekend IW put the game on sale and offered a free weekend in anticipation of the DLC release this week. They know the game is bad- they are bailing out and trying to grab as much cash from it as they can before it dies. If you have not wasted the money yet, save it for something else. You will not regret it.… Expand
  48. welshwatson
    Nov 5, 2013
    0
    Usual rinse and repeat from this series, what we've come to expect from COD now, its so sad to see such a great game franchise become like madden and Fifa.
  49. SirRodney
    Dec 10, 2013
    0
    Do you like losing substantial amounts of money by buying the same game 11 times? well then this is the game for you. Call of Duty Ghosts' is a big step back, I would go as far to say that the Modern Warfare games were better and that this feels like something Infinity Ward rushed to get some more money. I wonder how long it will be until this series dies out.
  50. Gamersfleet
    Nov 5, 2013
    0
    it's Call of Duty... with a dog.. and fish AI that make you unable to play unless you have 6 GB RAM which is pure insanity

    worst game release of all time.
  51. shoder032
    Nov 5, 2013
    0
    Horrible games, may the worst game in the COD series, bad graphics, bad story, bad multiplayer. I'm so disappointed, and WTF, the system requirements, the graphics is very bad, I't can't compare to Battlefield 3 using Frostbite2, and Battlefield 4 using Frostbite3 does NOT need 6gb ram to play.
  52. bops2hardcore
    Nov 5, 2013
    1
    Played MW3 and Bops2 hardcore. Bops2 felt different at first but quickly you realized the gameplay and movement was evolved besides the graphics.
    COD ghost campaign story line is compelling and graphics are ok.
    COD MP is terrible a step back from bops2. High FPS still seems laggy, movement not the same,, maps are small. Definitely developed for consoles to showcase mediocre graphics    Played MW3 and Bops2 hardcore. Bops2 felt different at first but quickly you realized the gameplay and movement was evolved besides the graphics.
    COD ghost campaign story line is compelling and graphics are ok.
    COD MP is terrible a step back from bops2. High FPS still seems laggy, movement not the same,, maps are small. Definitely developed for consoles to showcase mediocre graphics with lighting effects on small maps.
    +1 guns are to be more detailed.    … Expand
  53. fahadansari
    Nov 5, 2013
    0
    I used to love COD. Up until MW3. BO2 was the worst of them all. Since MW3, COD games have been plagued by the same (and justly right) criticism gameplay hasnt changed over the last many years, graphics havent improved, lag and connection issues, stupid quickscoping snipers, etc. After BO2, I thought I would never buy another COD game, but I guess I am a sucker for the hype of this. In myI used to love COD. Up until MW3. BO2 was the worst of them all. Since MW3, COD games have been plagued by the same (and justly right) criticism gameplay hasnt changed over the last many years, graphics havent improved, lag and connection issues, stupid quickscoping snipers, etc. After BO2, I thought I would never buy another COD game, but I guess I am a sucker for the hype of this. In my mind, I kidded myself thinking this year it would be different, this year (especially with the advent of next gen) COD would look amazing, play amazing and after the fallout from BO2, Infinity Ward would do something... interesting with the game. I have played probably around 7 matches. And I hate this game. Same old stuff graphics no improvement. Gameplay boring as hell. Poor spawning. Connection issues. Snipers still bloody camping. I discovered Battlefield BC2 a while back and have been a fan of the series since. I have never been a fanboy type, but seriously, BF4 (even with the games many technical issues re connection, rubber banding, stat losses, etc) is a far far better game. Even BF3 is far superior to COD Ghosts.
    I could go on here and make this pretty extensive, however I am itching to play some more BF4, so will keep this brief. In summary: DO NOT WASTE YOUR MONEY ON THIS GAME. ITS THE SAME AS ALL THE OTHER CODS. Boring, full of campers, poor graphics (I am on a high end PC and this game looks ancient), poor gameplay, poor optimisation, no way to adjust key things like ADS sensitivities, etc.
    I think this is the end of the COD franchise (I hope so anyway) especially with the likes of BF4, Destiny, Titanfall and others coming out which are far better games. Goodbye COD, I will not miss you.    … Expand
  54. efeenes74
    Nov 5, 2013
    0
    The game needs your gaming rig to have 6 gigs of ram or more to start the game you purchased. That means 32-bit computers won't be able to start the damn game. What's ironic is, the game needs 2 gigs of ram to run smoothly. This is the reason why this game is an epic fail for PC. The graphics are terrible, gameplay is bad, bad scenario in a game and copy pasted multiplayer from ModernThe game needs your gaming rig to have 6 gigs of ram or more to start the game you purchased. That means 32-bit computers won't be able to start the damn game. What's ironic is, the game needs 2 gigs of ram to run smoothly. This is the reason why this game is an epic fail for PC. The graphics are terrible, gameplay is bad, bad scenario in a game and copy pasted multiplayer from Modern Warfare 3.
    I said enough, this game is a piece of 0/10, good job Activision.    … Expand
  55. Stalker0789
    Nov 5, 2013
    0
    This is a horrible peace of don't touch it... My PC desecrated by this game. And I don't known what I can write about this peace of puke more than 150 characters.
  56. Crusader7
    Nov 5, 2013
    0
    Is this game a joke? The graphics are below average, the FoV is locked, limited settings all around, and the requirements are absurd. Even if you have a spec'd out PC, expect micro-stutters and a terrible FPS. Also, where are the dedicated servers!? You'd think if you made billions off the damn game you'd invest back into it. Every damn match ends in either a disconnect from a terribleIs this game a joke? The graphics are below average, the FoV is locked, limited settings all around, and the requirements are absurd. Even if you have a spec'd out PC, expect micro-stutters and a terrible FPS. Also, where are the dedicated servers!? You'd think if you made billions off the damn game you'd invest back into it. Every damn match ends in either a disconnect from a terrible host or a host migration.

    Same rehashed crap. Do something new!

    Bad game. Bad optimisation. Bad developer.    … Expand
  57. Brochacho
    Nov 5, 2013
    0
    My, how the might have fallen. I still don't understand how Modern Warfare 1 and 2 could have been so good in comparison to this game. This franchise has taken a nose-dive, and at our expense. While I see Arma 3 as the best for simulation in this genre, I normally go to CoD for a more fluid and exciting experience. With that said, the single player campaign is shorter and all over theMy, how the might have fallen. I still don't understand how Modern Warfare 1 and 2 could have been so good in comparison to this game. This franchise has taken a nose-dive, and at our expense. While I see Arma 3 as the best for simulation in this genre, I normally go to CoD for a more fluid and exciting experience. With that said, the single player campaign is shorter and all over the place... nowehere near as gripping as it was in previous iterations of the game. That used to be a strong point for CoD. Whoops, gone. The controls and gun customization are still tops in my opinion, quite good. The graphics and physics? ZERO innovation over the last release. When you have DICE coming out with entirely new versions of its engine and implementing that in its new release, how could you NOT keep up with your competition? There is a level of arrogance that I find unacceptable in many of these companies. They think that we as gamers will buy their new games (within a franchise) JUST because it was made. They forget that gamers have certain expectations and that we drive the industry as consumers, not the other way around. I'm sorry, but CoD Ghosts, you failed me on too many levels. I haven't been a BF fan in years, but for the sake of enjoyment, I am going to be dividing my time between BF4 and Arma3. This was not an improvement on your last release at all.… Expand
  58. axel8288
    Nov 5, 2013
    0
    Mediocre Game. Graphics are bad for a 2013 game. Most areas are shadowy and dark It's like another mw3... No dedicated servers, Weapon Sounds are terrible. I have an i7- 3770k running 4.5 with a single 780 FTW and 32 GB of ram and this game stutters. for some reason fps are capped at 90 even with the vsync off and refresh rate set at 120. I played this for over 1 hour and it was plenty ofMediocre Game. Graphics are bad for a 2013 game. Most areas are shadowy and dark It's like another mw3... No dedicated servers, Weapon Sounds are terrible. I have an i7- 3770k running 4.5 with a single 780 FTW and 32 GB of ram and this game stutters. for some reason fps are capped at 90 even with the vsync off and refresh rate set at 120. I played this for over 1 hour and it was plenty of time to unistall that garbage and make room on my ssd. Please don't buy this game and look at all those reviews...I know fanboys will never hear any bad comments about cod games but it's sad and yes it's true. cod 4 good, cod 5 good, mw2 good but no dedicated, black ops bad, mw3 horrible, black ops II no dedicated servers but well optimized and nice game, cod ghosts worsth of all cod franchise.

    This game should be a FREE TO PLAY GAME....    … Expand
  59. MrZanyGaming
    Nov 5, 2013
    0
    This is one of the worst games I have ever played. I'm not even exaggerating, Ride to Hell: Retribution is worth more of your money than this pile of crap. Don't waste your hard earned money on this game.....
  60. birdnips
    Nov 5, 2013
    0
    This game may be good for Console or something, but I cannot even believe how crappy it is on PC. Graphics are 2002 at best, sound is worse, I don't even know how that's possible. pew pew, pew pew.

    I have a solid gaming machine and am not having any issues at all with framerate or gameplay with everything turned all the way up. The problem is solely what I said in paragraph 1: IT    This game may be good for Console or something, but I cannot even believe how crappy it is on PC. Graphics are 2002 at best, sound is worse, I don't even know how that's possible. pew pew, pew pew.

    I have a solid gaming machine and am not having any issues at all with framerate or gameplay with everything turned all the way up. The problem is solely what I said in paragraph 1: IT LOOKS, PLAYS, AND SOUNDS LIKE ABSOLUTE POOP.

    See you on BF4 or Minesweeper.    … Expand
  61. RageGreeny
    Nov 5, 2013
    0
    Genuinely, the game is AGAIN identical to it's predecessors and it's beyond a joke now.
    Maybe when the next CoD installment is released I'll copy and paste this review in a better font.
  62. krakchingkrak
    Nov 6, 2013
    0
    game sucks. campaign sucks. multiplayer sucks.. story sucks. this all maps only have 2 teams fighting against each other and its always the same "Ghosts vs Fed" thing, at least make more like "Ghosts vs Something****ty" stuff, the only thing i enjoyed so far is just extinction. Overall this game is just one complete piece of ****

    I'm going back to of Doody Modirn Gay****stupid. At    game sucks. campaign sucks. multiplayer sucks.. story sucks. this all maps only have 2 teams fighting against each other and its always the same "Ghosts vs Fed" thing, at least make more like "Ghosts vs Something****ty" stuff, the only thing i enjoyed so far is just extinction. Overall this game is just one complete piece of ****

    I'm going back to of Doody Modirn Gay****stupid. At least I don't have to bother with the ****ty things anymore. you In****iny Ward, I believed that you'd make a better game than BO ****ing 2. THE NEW OF DOODYs!!!!    … Expand
  63. iCEadDer
    Nov 8, 2013
    0
    Seriously bad is an understatement. But let me explain a little because of this fabulous critique.
    First; MILLIONS OF BUGS Mires where you look Impossible to play for hundreds of failures it has. Forget playing in CrossFire. Do not bother to install the latest drivers for your graphics NOT WORK do not bother spending hours adjusting the settings of the game, NOT WORK do not bother    Seriously bad is an understatement. But let me explain a little because of this fabulous critique.
    First; MILLIONS OF BUGS Mires where you look Impossible to play for hundreds of failures it has. Forget playing in CrossFire. Do not bother to install the latest drivers for your graphics NOT WORK do not bother spending hours adjusting the settings of the game, NOT WORK do not bother spending hours on forums to find some way of playing NOT WORK do not bother to disable programs like FRAPS MSI Afterburner or any other exit Overlay program ITSELF AS THE STEAM.

    In the end, after hours and hours lost I could get to play around a little Campaign and Multi-Player. The truth is that with a few minutes and you have the feeling of playing the CoD MW 3.1. If version 3.1 of Modern Warfare 3 but poorly made More of the same with the same graphics and the same The campaign, Multi-Player, ****.

    Worst of all is that people ACTIVISION has the shamelessness to sell this! An unfinished ALFA smelling a game port of XBOX 360 made ​​reluctantly All whores promises that this would be a major change in the CoD series and more on the PC version has come to nothing. A DECEPTION OF 70, A JOKE HEAVY BAD TASTE .

    WORST IN MANY YEARS! Anybody OS NO HARD ON THIS NOT A SCAM OS OCCURRING OR IS ALPHA BUY THIS GAME LIKE FIVE YEARS AGO THAT YOU HAVE GIVEN A 7/10 BUT YOU TODAY'S DATE HAS TWO A 2/10 AND PROBLEMS WITHOUT MAKING IT WORK FOR.

    Sorry for my very bad English.    … Expand
  64. vanomas1337
    Nov 8, 2013
    0
    Piece of 0/10 dasdasdasdasdasdasdasdasdasdasddasdasdasdasdsadasdasdasasasdasdasdasdasdasdasasasdasdasdasdasdasdasddasdsadasasdddsdsdsdssdsdsdsdsdssd
  65. niKopolDK
    Dec 19, 2013
    0
    Sadly I like the simplicity of older CoD titles. I liked the hallway shooting, to a partial degree I even liked the DLC to MW3 which should've been the highlight of what was to come. Like the open field with a crashed plane with buildings full of snipers. I've played every Call of Duty to date. I hated a few maps here and there but I ended up hating all but maybe three.

    The maps.    Sadly I like the simplicity of older CoD titles. I liked the hallway shooting, to a partial degree I even liked the DLC to MW3 which should've been the highlight of what was to come. Like the open field with a crashed plane with buildings full of snipers. I've played every Call of Duty to date. I hated a few maps here and there but I ended up hating all but maybe three.

    The maps. Between being too open and the spawns being all over the place ranging from out in the middle of nowhere on the map, to spawning you behind the person that killed you, to in front of another player. I really did enjoy it for everything but those two things because they make it a completely different game. I have adjusted to it but its just not the same experience.

    Single player was its usual par for the course action through linear maps of connecting hallways. Some people find the multiplayer part of the game absolutely great. Which makes me feel like I haven't tried. Even though I've already put in 100 hours into the game, meanwhile the person who said its great has played for maybe 24 hours who also promptly told me I just suck even though he could only kill me from behind.

    The constantly getting shot from every possible angle. The constant fear of wondering where bullets are going to come from. So you cower down behind a bush and wait for an enemy to run by and you don't feel good about what you did. I would say this game could cause flare ups of PTSD for retired soldiers. A game isn't supposed to do that. A game is supposed to be fun. But congrats on getting the realism right.    … Expand
  66. Swight
    Nov 14, 2014
    3
    This game is the least innoavtive one in the francsise no fov slider and lots of bugs game.
    They game is glitchy as heck and it is not worth a big 30-60 dollar.
    The game was dead before it was even launched that why they called it call of duty ghosts.
    Call of duty spooks is really crap 10/10
  67. tsk12
    Mar 12, 2014
    3
    this singular mode quite OK! However, the bad graphics and the high requirement of the hardware ruins the game. Also, the multiplayer mode give me a boring experiment. This game doesn't worth it. Stop to waster your time on playing this game!
  68. Salvaje9
    Nov 10, 2013
    1
    After cod 4 this series has been getting worst with every release, they want to force the console limitations on the PC, no dedicated servers, no mod tools, they should cancel this for pc.
  69. MadDad
    Dec 17, 2013
    0
    Ghosts is the most terrible COD franchise ever Optimisation sucks and too many bugs are to play well
    It's way worse than BO2 I am not going to buy COD made by IW again. Copy paste to again rip off customers......
  70. Drew1991
    Nov 12, 2013
    0
    wow.... a step backwards this time around. I'm really surprised the has a high critic that it does. Most of these sites are probably getting paid to say good things about a game that's gone stale.
  71. mob0103
    Nov 11, 2013
    0
    Congrats on ruining yet another episode of this once great franchise. Multiplayer should be called Black Ops 2.1. Are you kidding me? Have the developers not played MW2 or MW3 infinity wards last two games? What a f*cking joke. Last time you'll get my money. I give you 1 point for extinction, which is a rip off of the many "Killing Floor" type games so nothing that you guys have inventedCongrats on ruining yet another episode of this once great franchise. Multiplayer should be called Black Ops 2.1. Are you kidding me? Have the developers not played MW2 or MW3 infinity wards last two games? What a f*cking joke. Last time you'll get my money. I give you 1 point for extinction, which is a rip off of the many "Killing Floor" type games so nothing that you guys have invented but it is fun to play. At least I'll get $9.99 worth from the game.… Expand
  72. cocolapin
    Nov 10, 2013
    0
    this game is bad, bad graphics, bad music, bad gameplay, bad scenario, bad multiplayer, bad weapons, bad mods, bad optimization, bad maps, bad bad bad
  73. djturner83
    Nov 10, 2013
    0
    if u want to waste 40 quid then buy this game! random freezes glitches and cant play the game on any graphics settings without the game freezing between a minute of playing or a few hours. the graphics are so bad id say games that came out 5 years ago look better than this. rainbow six for example. the game play is terrible im used to playing ghost recon were there is at least a bit ofif u want to waste 40 quid then buy this game! random freezes glitches and cant play the game on any graphics settings without the game freezing between a minute of playing or a few hours. the graphics are so bad id say games that came out 5 years ago look better than this. rainbow six for example. the game play is terrible im used to playing ghost recon were there is at least a bit of strategy involved, all u do in cod is run shoot run shoot spawn infront of enemy die then die again, yawn. the worst game iv purchased for pc. at least if id gone xbox route i could sell this crap… Expand
  74. FramerTerminate
    Nov 10, 2013
    0
    I think it is simple when you look at this game. It is worse than its predecessor in every way on top of having 0 innovation. The aliens co op is garbage in comparison to others so honestly there is no reason to get this game unless you want to stimulate the creation of horrible games...
  75. espadaxin2
    Nov 5, 2013
    0
    A step backwards from Black Ops 2. Graphics are awful and with a very lower framerate than expected. Hell, I'm getting more frames in BF4 than this game. The port is terrible with bugs from MW3 still. The sound effects seems like a copy paste from MW3 too. Don't buy this crash grab game, stay far away from it.
  76. MrPotato123
    Feb 28, 2014
    0
    COD is dead im not going to do a review of 2000 characters cuz this game is pure sh1t .. i miss the old CODs about WW2 ... MW2 was good but black ops and ghos is reciceld garbage
  77. badd3vil
    Nov 6, 2013
    0
    1. 28 gb on HDD
    2. very bad optimisation.
    3. no-playable on normal settings of graphics. only on high( but on high settings see p.2
    4. On my PC i5/i7, 8gb ram and hd6850 game crash every 3 min with high settings.

    DON'T BUY!
  78. Hseeker25
    Nov 8, 2013
    3
    Its basicly a COD mod, not worth the price, to much console orientated.
    This is a step back from Black Ops 2, If I turn on modern warfare 2 I get the same deal, I guese playing a female and having a dog is the only inovating they could come up with.
  79. Mbdelta
    Nov 15, 2013
    1
    This game may appeal to Call Of Duty fans who will play any game with that title, but will baffle people who know a good game when they see it. A big step down from Black Ops II.
  80. Lafa
    Nov 10, 2013
    0
    I am a Call of Duty player and this Call of duty is the worst Call of Duty i've ever played.
    the map design is poor the graphics looks like a game from 2008.
    The game has no FoV changer, you cant configure your Sensitivity normally (choose a number but only a slider). No dedicated servers, no console.

    just a bad game feels like i spent my money on a big garbage game.
  81. Kcehobait
    Nov 11, 2013
    0
    The graphics are even worse than the transition from Cod 2 to 3. I am so glad I didn't buy any of the map packs or expansions. This will be the last CoD I ever buy. I mean honestly PayDay 2 has better graphics. (i agree)
  82. Valeev
    Nov 5, 2013
    0
    Why I payed for this?I will never buy CoD.I have 6gb RAM, but game says, that I haven't enough RAM.
    WTF?I need my money back! Next gen realy. The worst game ever.
  83. Johnix
    Nov 5, 2013
    1
    Call of duty did it again:
    Releasing the same game which naive people will buy again.
    It is a very disappointing game if you played the series for a long time.
    It has almost no innovation at all. The highly praised by the marketing team next gen engine is just a bit prettier than MW3. Single player is decent, but only if you don't get tired of linear map design.
  84. blown503
    Nov 5, 2013
    0
    We have been dooped again from I W. The players still wobble when they run, graphics on highest setting is awe-ful. Has the feeling of the old game with a new map. The physics are crap too. Im pretty sure I will never own another piece of call of duty anything. I am tired of them getting rich off of people like me who work hard and end up with a rummage sale item.
  85. Ripdrive
    Nov 5, 2013
    0
    Game is terrible. Servers are laggy and the multiplayer stinks. As other people have stated the ports suck and they probably just copied the game from consoles. Well looks like I spent $60 for a campaign game I will stick to battlefield from now on lesson learned on this release. Oh and the graphics are terrible.. Your pistol looks ridiculous. Hopefully patches fix this but I doubt it asGame is terrible. Servers are laggy and the multiplayer stinks. As other people have stated the ports suck and they probably just copied the game from consoles. Well looks like I spent $60 for a campaign game I will stick to battlefield from now on lesson learned on this release. Oh and the graphics are terrible.. Your pistol looks ridiculous. Hopefully patches fix this but I doubt it as there is just to much wrong with the game.… Expand
  86. M48
    Nov 5, 2013
    0
    Awful campaign. Inferior graphics. This is freaking same old game. In summary, pure piece of crap. This ruins the whole COD franchise. 'Ghosts' needs to be busted. It should be executed in the market.
  87. Mandy22
    Nov 6, 2013
    0
    CoD: Ghosts: Disgusting.

    Making a list will just be easier. Framerate locked at a low 90Hz, Memory leaks, Locked FOV at 65, No audio options, No Sensitivity numbers (for remembering), slider only, No theater mode, Micro stutter on SLI, Poor textures, General optimazation and framrate issues on the best of hardware, Keys are unbound, shows poor attitude towards PC, Gameplay:    CoD: Ghosts: Disgusting.

    Making a list will just be easier.
    Framerate locked at a low 90Hz,
    Memory leaks,
    Locked FOV at 65,
    No audio options,
    No Sensitivity numbers (for remembering), slider only,
    No theater mode,
    Micro stutter on SLI,
    Poor textures,
    General optimazation and framrate issues on the best of hardware,
    Keys are unbound, shows poor attitude towards PC,

    Gameplay:
    Compulsory knife animation leaves player vulnerable,
    Poor map design,
    "destructible environments" a few things fall over.

    I cant take this game seriously, Infinity wards arrogance knows no bounds.    … Expand
  88. heoiii
    Nov 6, 2013
    0
    game cod ghost is the worst quality game i have ever played The graphics are even worse than the transition from Cod 2 to 3. I am so glad I didn't buy any of the map packs or expansions. This will be the last CoD I ever buy. I mean honestly PayDay 2 has better graphics. I thought it would be cool that you could customize a character and become a woman. I think thats the only improvementgame cod ghost is the worst quality game i have ever played The graphics are even worse than the transition from Cod 2 to 3. I am so glad I didn't buy any of the map packs or expansions. This will be the last CoD I ever buy. I mean honestly PayDay 2 has better graphics. I thought it would be cool that you could customize a character and become a woman. I think thats the only improvement this game has made.… Expand
  89. BizHat
    Nov 6, 2013
    0
    Not running properly on my PC. They need to optimize the game. I buy this game to see how it is compared to my favorite game Battlefield. Going back to battlefield. Hope they will improve CoD performance on PC.
  90. TUgiF
    Nov 6, 2013
    0
    The Multiplayer is always the same as in other CoD Titles it´s like you buying a 59$ DLC for your Call of Duty 4 .

    6 Gb RAM in requirements is also a problem i saw better graphics with less RAm ^^
  91. JeZu89
    Nov 6, 2013
    1
    horrible mal optimizado, casi ninguna innovación, tanto que se les pidió un nuevo motor gráfico y lo único que hacen es mejorar el que siempre han usado, y mas encima lo hacen mal, gráficos que no precisamente son next gen, pide una barbaridad de recursos, cumpliendo los que pide no anda bien... que mal juego por dios... le doy un 1 porque aun podrían corregirlo, pero ya es horriblementehorrible mal optimizado, casi ninguna innovación, tanto que se les pidió un nuevo motor gráfico y lo único que hacen es mejorar el que siempre han usado, y mas encima lo hacen mal, gráficos que no precisamente son next gen, pide una barbaridad de recursos, cumpliendo los que pide no anda bien... que mal juego por dios... le doy un 1 porque aun podrían corregirlo, pero ya es horriblemente tarde. Se veía venir esto, la saga CoD ya no da para mas. Reventaron la gallina de los huevos de oro. Año tras año pasan por encima de la comunidad PC, siendo que fue la que le dio vida a esta saga.… Expand
  92. basedvolvo
    Nov 10, 2013
    0
    The graphics are even worse than the transition from Cod 2 to 3. I am so glad I didn't buy any of the map packs or expansions. This will be the last CoD I ever buy. I mean honestly PayDay 2 has better graphics. I thought it would be cool that you could customize a character and become a woman. I think thats the only improvement this game has made.
  93. ivanqueiroz
    Nov 10, 2013
    0
    The worst COD ever!!! A lot of bugs, heavy (fps drops in my gtx 660 ti ftw), mouse sensitivity problems and no dedicated server or theater. Graphics are a deception (if you compare with MW2 or MW3).
  94. mrgrin4444
    Nov 10, 2013
    0
    This game sucks. The same ending, lags, low fps, graphics are worse than MW' graphics. Gameplay hasn't changed at all. Kotik doesnt give a crap about people's feeling. Go to hell, Activision
  95. dups
    Nov 10, 2013
    0
    This is the worst game of all time and the developers know it. They also know that people are dumb enough to buy that game. Don't be dumb don't buy that.
  96. cesspit
    Nov 10, 2013
    0
    Greetings from Poland;) I have: i7, 12 GB RAM, top AMD card and 128 GB SSD disk. But i cannot play GHOST, cause each 5 minutes i have black screen... WTF?
  97. Migywer
    Nov 14, 2013
    0
    First things first, I made this account just to warn you guys who havent bought it yet, DONT BUY IT.

    I was in between of buying it it and not buying it for a week now, and guess what I BOUGHT IT! I had ALOT of issues with BO1 almost half of the maps didnt work, (unknown error) steam or treyarch did nutting about it. MW3 came, bought it, even more issues AGAIN with mouse    First things first, I made this account just to warn you guys who havent bought it yet, DONT BUY IT.

    I was in between of buying it it and not buying it for a week now, and guess what I BOUGHT IT!

    I had ALOT of issues with BO1 almost half of the maps didnt work, (unknown error) steam or treyarch did nutting about it. MW3 came, bought it, even more issues AGAIN with mouse sensitivity crashes fps drops all that.
    then for some reason I still bought BO2 and I actually liked it, I actually still think that it is the second best call of duty to date.
    So about GHOSTS. I cant understand those scumbags at IW.. I mean, this is the worst game I'v ever seen, indluding how new the game is.
    the MP is barely playable, it has screen tearing even with vsync on, texture flickering, terrible fps drops, crashes...god o'll mighty help us with this crap..
    I own all of the Call of Duty games, yes, definitely something not to be proud of, but I always end up thinking "maybe this time they'v fixed it, now its good!" but no, it never is.. good buy Call of Duty, forever.
    and excuse me for my bad English.    … Expand
  98. rodness
    Nov 15, 2013
    1
    DO NOT BUY THIS GAME!!!!
    Iv'e been playing COD for 4 years now ever since COD4 and this is the worst they've done thus far.
    I'm forced to play on servers with horrible ping so instead of being on the top of each game like in MW1-2-3. I find myself getting killed before even seeing the enemy! first i get shot and then the enemy appears. The maps are the worst in the series so far (not    DO NOT BUY THIS GAME!!!!
    Iv'e been playing COD for 4 years now ever since COD4 and this is the worst they've done thus far.
    I'm forced to play on servers with horrible ping so instead of being on the top of each game like in MW1-2-3.
    I find myself getting killed before even seeing the enemy! first i get shot and then the enemy appears.

    The maps are the worst in the series so far (not exaggerating) and the weapons are weird and ugly, the game is also laggy for everyone and crashes a lot (i'm playing on the newest drivers).

    I gave it 1 point because it could have been a good game if Activision were not an evil company.    … Expand
  99. SILENTBOB
    Nov 15, 2013
    2
    Activision release a beta game to the market.

    The multi-player on this game is a mess. To get it working correctly the use of 3rd party plugin's is required, but by using these plugins you will run the risk of your account being banned. This is supposed to be a next gen game but it doesn't support sli. Even the steam overlay is not recommended with this game. Takes another    Activision release a beta game to the market.

    The multi-player on this game is a mess. To get it working correctly the use of 3rd party plugin's is required, but by using these plugins you will run the risk of your account being banned.

    This is supposed to be a next gen game but it doesn't support sli. Even the steam overlay is not recommended with this game. Takes another multi-player aspect away from a bad game.Theres that many things wrong or broke in the game that the 5000 max letters wouldn't be enough.

    In its current state avoid the PC version of the game.

    Cons    … Expand
  100. Zabre
    Nov 15, 2013
    2
    The game does a great job!... of doing the same thing with the Cod 4 engine that IW did with the other CoD games. Disgustingly bad singleplayer paired with poor graphics and too much of an emphasis on multiplayer make this game an obvious miss for those looking for a truly good time.
Page:

Awards & Rankings

9
#9 Most Discussed PC Game of 2013
53
#53 Most Shared PC Game of 2013

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
68

Mixed or average reviews - based on 14 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 5 out of 14
  2. Mixed: 7 out of 14
  3. Negative: 2 out of 14
  1. PC PowerPlay
    Dec 30, 2013
    80
    It's exactly what fans of the franchise have grown to expect. No surprises here, folks. [Jan 2014, p.90]
  2. LEVEL (Czech Republic)
    Nov 25, 2013
    60
    Nothing to see here in terms of innovation: the campaign is dull, the multiplayer fun. But this time, the air of sameness is a little bit too much. [Issue#236]
  3. IncGamers
    Nov 24, 2013
    40
    An utterly horrible PC port mars an otherwise very, very average Call of Duty game. Nothing to see here.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »