Call of Duty: Black Ops III

 PC
User Score
3.7

Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 1426 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 324 out of 1426
  2. Mixed: 256 out of 1426
  3. Negative: 846 out of 1426
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. Baronz
    Dec 25, 2015
    3
    This game should be called CoD LSD Trip Ops... Aside from the terrible lags even with a good system, the story is really unepic, the worst CoD i ever played...
  2. Indrigis
    Dec 13, 2015
    7
    Let me start by saying that the game deserves a solid 5/10 considering the server issues. But assuming they're fixed...

    Multiplayer: Gunplay: It's yet more of Advanced Warfare except now horribly mutilated. The maps are small and full of obstacles deliberately placed to promote close range SMG shootouts over long range shots. Moreover, maps went from 3D to 3Lane, introducing lots of    Let me start by saying that the game deserves a solid 5/10 considering the server issues. But assuming they're fixed...

    Multiplayer:

    Gunplay: It's yet more of Advanced Warfare except now horribly mutilated. The maps are small and full of obstacles deliberately placed to promote close range SMG shootouts over long range shots. Moreover, maps went from 3D to 3Lane, introducing lots of obstructions, headglitch spots and long corridors lined by invisible walls. Adding to that, all the weapons have been made a lot more precise and most SMGs are quite effective at 50 metres, rendering proper sniping moot. The FMJ attachment is supposed to improve penetration but any given obstacle being penetratable at all is wildly inconsistent. The movement mechanics, again, are, in a sense, more limited than in AW but with the shrunken maps they are more than enough.

    Scorestreaks: Instead of customizable scorestreaks from AW (a great improvement) there are now lots of one-trick vehicles which can be easily shot down with a few launcher missiles. No more map-specific scorestreaks either. Overall this feels like a great step back.

    Special abilities: Specialist abilities are just different from Exo-abilities. You no longer start with a full charge each life but rather charge it over time and score. On the other hand, specialist weapons tend to be a lot more destructive than anything else and some abilities are great for clutch plays.

    Overall: I would say that Black Ops 3 feels very forced. The borderline synthetic map design and weapon equalization waste the potential gained from what was fixed. And the whole "More like the classics" design idea doesn't work well with the futuristic wall running and explosive bows.

    Single Player: The campaign is not good. There are lots of fan theories explaining it all and creating a sensible timeline and plot but actually playing the campaign is not enjoyable. It's a disjointed experience devoid of really great moments or a global plot arc. More than anything, it's full of frustratingly stupid decisions made by every character without any player agency (since it's not an RPG, obviously).

    Zombies: Instead of a typical horde mode Zombies becomes an obscure adventure-like experience where you have to collect artifacts, perform rituals and do all sorts of songs and dances that have nothing to do with actual shooting. The biggest indicator of this is the "have one player kite the last zombie around while the other three are doing the item collection/beast transformation/easter egg completion" tradition. Is it fun? Maybe. Is it in line with the rest of the game? Not so much.

    And last but not the least, PC-specific issues: At the moment of writing several weapons are downright imbalanced, like Drakon, the semi-auto sniper rifle that is a 2-hit kill at any range, has very little recoil and can be shot repeatedly for quite some time due to a 28-round magazine. The server quality, at least in EU (and, I think, Australia too) is downright unacceptable with random disconnects and horrible lag and rubberbanding issues a lot of the time. Many bugs and absent features too, like mouse inversion when aiming scorestreaks by tablet, lack of separate control for ADS mouse sensitivity and the like. The matchmaking is somewhat questionable, mixing good players with all sorts of other players.

    Although Treyarch/Activision might get a solid B for effort, the post-release support and communication are almost absent. If it stays this way, the game might not hold its own on PC for very long.    … Expand
  3. Borreh
    Nov 13, 2015
    10
    And here I thought Soma will be the only game this year that would make me use my brain. I was dead wrong.

    This game's solo campaign was better than Call of Duty has any right to be. I'll admit right away that I like the solo campaigns of this series, but I always expected a good spectacle and a fun (if dumb) plot at best. Instead, this year we got a game that's out there, among    And here I thought Soma will be the only game this year that would make me use my brain. I was dead wrong.

    This game's solo campaign was better than Call of Duty has any right to be.

    I'll admit right away that I like the solo campaigns of this series, but I always expected a good spectacle and a fun (if dumb) plot at best. Instead, this year we got a game that's out there, among Bioshock, Spec Ops: The Line, Metro: Last Lights and the likes; One of the most intelligent stories I ever experienced in an FPS game. It feels more like a well-written action spin-off of Deus Ex rather than another CoD. It might seem borderline nonsensical at times near the end, but if you read between the lines (quite literally) and give it some thought, it's perfectly logical (albeit with multiple interpretations available). All of this is mixed with the top-notch spectacle you'd expect from this series; Just this time there's some real substance beyond all the explosions.

    Add good visuals, some great music, and, what's more important, surprisingly good gameplay. The player movement is extremely fluid, cyber powers useful and fun to use, enemies engaging. Yes, enemies - For once, CoD introduced varied enemy types that make the gameplay much more varied and demanding. Oh, and did I mention this game has boss battles?... I'll say that again: Call of Duty has boss battles.

    The campaign is surprisingly long and replayable. Even more, finishing it unlocks a new game + mode with a different storyline and slightly different missions. Add to that the most fleshed out (and fun as always) Zombies mode yet that just reeks with character and the best multiplayer the series has seen since a long time. Sure, it borrows heavily from Titanfall, but more than makes up for that with decent balance, fun maps, tons of content, and the (nowadays obligatory) addition of unique heroes that add some flavour to the games.

    Yes, the game did get its share of technical issues at launch (many of which were fixed within the first 24 hours after the release), and the jigsaw plot combined with strongly modified gameplay can feel alienating for old fans of the series, but give this game a chance. For the singleplayer alone, it is worth it.

    PS. It is incredibly amusing to see people praising Bioshock Infinite for having a complex storyline, and then bashing Black Ops 3 as "incomprehensible gibberish" for doing the exact same thing. It is almost as if our expectations towards games define their quality, and not the games themselves. If it's Bioshock, it has to have a deeper meaning, if it's CoD, it has to be stupid nonsense. I wish people would be more open-minded than that.    … Expand
  4. ThatBenGuy
    Jan 5, 2019
    0
    The gameplay sucks big time and the storyline is just so confusing, it's not even funny. Call of Duty has been losing its charm as years have been going on, with a few mere exceptions, but they are just that - exceptions!
  5. Eero94
    Nov 6, 2015
    0
    Memory leak. Uses all 16 GB of RAM in less than a few hours play

    Frequent crashes VRAM being maxed out, including those with 12 GB of VRAM Overclock instability, BSOD. The guy had to go into BIOS in order to make his computer boot up properly after running this game Frequent FPS drops, despite high end rig Treyarch have said that any i5 CPU is going to experience frame    Memory leak. Uses all 16 GB of RAM in less than a few hours play

    Frequent crashes

    VRAM being maxed out, including those with 12 GB of VRAM

    Overclock instability, BSOD. The guy had to go into BIOS in order to make his computer boot up properly after running this game

    Frequent FPS drops, despite high end rig

    Treyarch have said that any i5 CPU is going to experience frame drops. You need to lock the game to 2 cores. 2 threads. (lol what year is it Treyarch?)

    Don't buy the game or refund it.    … Expand
  6. corrado
    Nov 6, 2015
    0
    I love Black Ops II and I played too much time but III so bad don't buy.CoD BO II was good game. But this? Boring with "excelent" optimization. And it is really ugly game, that try copy good things from other games like Titanfall etc. One thing, that i say. Dont buy it. Ugly textures, stupid maps of 2000. And campaing? Just stupid
  7. DonMega
    Nov 7, 2015
    0
    What a garbage game. Has game breaking glitches that will drive you insane when you have to reload the game over and over again. They did update the graphics slightly but everything else including the general story is almost identical. Boring as hell too. I played 2 hours of the campaign and had to shut it off because I couldn't control my yawning. This is probably the worst call of duty IWhat a garbage game. Has game breaking glitches that will drive you insane when you have to reload the game over and over again. They did update the graphics slightly but everything else including the general story is almost identical. Boring as hell too. I played 2 hours of the campaign and had to shut it off because I couldn't control my yawning. This is probably the worst call of duty I have played to date.… Expand
  8. crusssell
    Nov 8, 2015
    9
    Best COD since MW2.
    They did so much right, from offline mode and split screen that seems to be neglected nowadays. It really doesn't seem fair that a bunch of butt hurt babies felt the need to picket before the patch landed that resolved a bunch of performance issues. (patched within 24 hours). Fun as Campaign (4player coop) zombies mode seems great (haven't played enough to really tell    Best COD since MW2.
    They did so much right, from offline mode and split screen that seems to be neglected nowadays. It really doesn't seem fair that a bunch of butt hurt babies felt the need to picket before the patch landed that resolved a bunch of performance issues. (patched within 24 hours). Fun as Campaign (4player coop) zombies mode seems great (haven't played enough to really tell though) and Multiplayer is been amazing. Great maps, great new abilities.

    It's a really good game. Any minor issues i had on release have been resolved. If you ever liked COD grab it.    … Expand
  9. J4MESOX4D
    Nov 6, 2015
    5
    Probably the best Call of Duty in recent years but despite a sterling effort from Treyarch in terms of a content-laden game; it is absolutely clear that the franchise has run its course. Also an inconsistent performance on PC and several old issues that have plagued the series previous, make this port an extremely disappointing release.

    Black Ops 3 is contains the usual 5 hour campaign    Probably the best Call of Duty in recent years but despite a sterling effort from Treyarch in terms of a content-laden game; it is absolutely clear that the franchise has run its course. Also an inconsistent performance on PC and several old issues that have plagued the series previous, make this port an extremely disappointing release.

    Black Ops 3 is contains the usual 5 hour campaign which is painfully linear, overly-cinematic and fails to inspire. The zombies mode will keep fans engaged for a while but if you want the complete experience; you'll need to spend a small fortune on the DLC and wait several months before the content starts flowing. The multiplayer aspect is a vast improvement over Advanced Warfare and Ghosts with fluid mechanics, lots of customisation and some enjoyable maps. Sadly the game is exceptionally buggy with crippling lag, dreadful bullet detection and very repetitive combat. Even the wealth of specialists, weapons and classes can't help the gameplay feel samey throughout.

    Treyarch were the last hope of salvaging the series and despite a strong offering in terms of a feature-packed title; it's simply not enough which indicates the franchise is at its end. With Sledgehammer and Infinity Ward up next; Activision would be better off calling it a day. Despite the strong positives of BO3; the series fails to have the same impact and quality that it once had and with games like Fallout 4 on the horizon; this game with all its woes will fail to keep you engaged.    … Expand
  10. grndzro
    Nov 8, 2015
    0
    Another bad CoD.....where is my vomit bag?
    ....ok It's not any better looking, It's short. It's unoptomized on a scale that makes me cringe. When people running top end hardware have to fk with settings and still have problems there is something wrong.
    Especially when MW1 beats the snot out of it graphically and runs 10x better. This game is Sacred3 level **** and never should have    Another bad CoD.....where is my vomit bag?
    ....ok It's not any better looking, It's short. It's unoptomized on a scale that makes me cringe. When people running top end hardware have to fk with settings and still have problems there is something wrong.

    Especially when MW1 beats the snot out of it graphically and runs 10x better. This game is Sacred3 level **** and never should have been released    … Expand
  11. plotlesviolence
    Mar 26, 2016
    7
    [OVERVIEW = 7]
    Another single/multiplayer FPS, not even the best CoD, but it does have splitscreen co-op.
    [PRESENTATION =4] (Graphics = 4) Whatever “tweaks” have supposedly been applied over the years, it still looks like it’s running on an unchanged 2007 CoD4 engine. It takes up 60 gigabytes but looks no better than CoD4 at 8 gig. (Visual aesthetics = 3) The problem with futuristic    [OVERVIEW = 7]
    Another single/multiplayer FPS, not even the best CoD, but it does have splitscreen co-op.

    [PRESENTATION =4]
    (Graphics = 4) Whatever “tweaks” have supposedly been applied over the years, it still looks like it’s running on an unchanged 2007 CoD4 engine. It takes up 60 gigabytes but looks no better than CoD4 at 8 gig.
    (Visual aesthetics = 3) The problem with futuristic is that, like MW3 and BlOps2, this just seems sort of bland. I preferred the realism of CoD4:MW, CoD:WaW, and CoD:BlOps1.
    (Sound Effects = 6)
    (Voice Acting = 6)
    (Physics = 2) Bizarrely, CoD continues to program in ragdoll physics but then strangles it by having it activate only after the same stupid pre-animated deaths as before, totally missing the point of ragdoll physics, which is to provide infinite fun ways to watch bodies gib and collapse. Worse, half the enemies are robots that don’t ragdoll at all.
    Worse, the CoD4 engine has always been very static: almost no background objects react to gunfire. By comparison, games like Stranglehold really make you feel powerful when you have a real, physics-based impact on the world every time your bullets miss.
    (Plot = 4) Skippable after it loads.

    [CONTROLS/MECHANICS = 8]
    (95% First-Person Shooter = 8)
    CoD BlOps3 has the same polished movement and firing scheme as past iterations. Aside from the Halo system, this is the best joystick-controlled shooting you can find, and it’s probably the best mouse-controlled FPS system if you prefer playing that way. It works without doing anything new. But the guns aren't that interesting, even compared to past CoD's; it’s pretty much just machine guns. You have your choice of a recharging “power” (i.e. hack one turret/enemy vs. bee swarm, etc.) but it doesn’t change much, and you can see enemies behind walls once highlighted, which is kind of cool. At least, unlike CoD:Ghosts, you can actually toggle nightvision on/off whenever you want.
    The thing is, the first-person-shooter as a genre is hardly dead. There are plenty of ways to make it interesting: fun weapons like Painkiller or Bulletstorm; destructible cover and environments like Red Faction or Battlefield:Bad Company; intelligent enemy AI like Half Life; enemies that blow up interestingly like Binary Domain; destroying enemy attack options with careful aim like Resident Evil 4 or Dead Space; or, giant Shadow-of-the-Collossus-like enemies like MGS:Peace Walker. And that's not even talking about combining FPS with other genres (like Deus Ex) or bogging it down with walking-simulator levels (like BioShock).
    Instead of innovation, we have the 8th expansion-pack to the 9-year-old CoD4.
    (5% Platforming = 8) The new change, slightly modified from CoD:MW3 (and ripped off of Titanfall), is the ability to jetpack double-jump and wall-run. It works pretty well, and adds a lot to the online multiplayer and certain sections of the single-player campaign, but it’s not a replacement for Mirror’s Edge.
    (Camera = 5)
    (Physics = 3)
    (Friendly AI = 5)
    (Enemy AI = 6) About half the enemies are robotic killdroids, which unlike the human enemies, can stand there and take a lot of punishment, which encourages taking cover more regularly. Whether this improves or aggravates is a matter of personal preference.

    [DESIGN = 8]
    (Menus = 5) The 3D home base you walk around in is a wasted concept for what should have been a simple menu.
    (Level Design = 7) It’s a linear corridor shooter, but you don’t get lost.
    (Difficulty Curve = 7) Regular checkpoints & co-operative players can revive you.
    (Upgrade System = 5)
    (Modes = Singleplayer/2-player splitscreen Cooperative campaign (10 hours, 0% padding), 2 Singleplayer/4-player cooperative Zombie horde campaigns (?), Competitive Multiplayer)
    BlOps3 does something commendable I haven't seen in an FPS in a long, long time: Splitscreen Co-Op on the PC version. I play alot of local multiplayer, and when we play FPS's that usually means Unreal Tournament 3 (4-player via hidden console commands) or Left-For-Dead 2 (2-player via hidden console commands). Serious Sam 3 is the only AAA-franchise PC FPS I'm aware of where the splitscreen is built-in and not hidden. When Halo 1 and 2 hit PC, Microsoft actually disabled the splitscreen that was already coded into the Xbox versions. Heck, Halo5 no longer offers even console splitscreen, even though fans would assuredly accept halving the supposedly restrictive 60 frames-per-sec to 30 during a co-op mode. For all the vitriol CoD games typically get, everyone should be encouraging this trend at least.
    Online multiplayer is fun, although I doubt it will still be populated in a year, and I prefer CoD4 online. I never touched the Zombies modes because shooting at slow unarmed enemies always bored me, even in co-op.

    [CONCLUSION]
    For all of my criticisms, mainly about the lack of improvements, I had an absolute blast playing through the splitscreen campaign with my friend and I recommend it mainly for that purpose.    … Expand
  12. Brend0g
    Nov 14, 2015
    3
    I'm just going to state the facts

    Painfully boring and the same linear campaign. It has no creativity and inspiration.Multiplayer is better than the Advance Warfare and Ghosts (the only good thing). The main thing for me is that buggy, crashing multiple time in half an hour and those fine for 2-3 hours before crashing repeatedly for another half an hour. Frustrating and annoying.    I'm just going to state the facts

    Painfully boring and the same linear campaign. It has no creativity and inspiration.Multiplayer is better than the Advance Warfare and Ghosts (the only good thing). The main thing for me is that buggy, crashing multiple time in half an hour and those fine for 2-3 hours before crashing repeatedly for another half an hour. Frustrating and annoying.

    Overall a bad quality game, don't buy.    … Expand
  13. stevenchang0
    Nov 7, 2015
    0
    Zombies is decent, I actually really liked the multiplayer until it got stale! But campaign sucks. Bad story. Want a good story and campaign in FPS? Play Halo, NOT COD.
  14. ragnarokew
    Dec 15, 2015
    3
    Here we go i dont want to write early review so i wait some for patches and gain some play time

    source:50 hours gameplay. Why very low ratings ? Because game deserves very low ratings there is too much thing to fix and game is expensive.My computer near good-good+ but i barely can take 60fps and too much people have problem with optimization if game not gonna be stable then what's to    Here we go i dont want to write early review so i wait some for patches and gain some play time

    source:50 hours gameplay.

    Why very low ratings ? Because game deserves very low ratings there is too much thing to fix and game is expensive.My computer near good-good+ but i barely can take 60fps and too much people have problem with optimization if game not gonna be stable then what's to point of playing ?

    Very bad campaign don't even play not worth

    Fun Multiplayer new specialist thing adds more fun unless game freeze.Multiplayer is good but they can still fix some things; weapons (smg long distance,shoutgun annoying) ,flamethrower tottaly annoying , too much jumping , not much player etc. etc.

    Zombies: Well this time nice job i really like zombies finnaly good ai , im giving 3 for zombie mod but you have to buy dlc for upcoming maps

    Worth buying ?

    NO    … Expand
  15. N3V3R
    Nov 11, 2015
    5
    ----------------------------------------------------------------
    Taylor -- " Imagine yourself in a frozen forest . "
    Me -- "You don't say mate! " ---------------------------------------------------------------- Seriously , this game feels like it's released in it's alpha state . Lag , freeze , fps drop . In main menu , all cores of my hex core processors is at 100% !! I didn't even    ----------------------------------------------------------------
    Taylor -- " Imagine yourself in a frozen forest . "
    Me -- "You don't say mate! "
    ----------------------------------------------------------------

    Seriously , this game feels like it's released in it's alpha state . Lag , freeze , fps drop . In main menu , all cores of my hex core processors is at 100% !! I didn't even load a map / level yet! Is it a joke?
    However , If they fixes the performance issue , it has potential to be a great COD Multiplayer experience (single player su*ks - except a few areas , the level design is the worst till date. And - shooting robots is not fun at all!!)
    Let's see what IW does with COD GHOSTS 2. (Q4 2016 , hopefully).    … Expand
  16. endermeister
    Dec 14, 2015
    4
    WTF you can slide up stairs. Fuc* gravity. though overall good grafic a kind of boring campaign but good online gameplay. recomend but still is unreal.
  17. limpchrisdude
    Aug 31, 2017
    0
    This is the worst game ever. I'd rather eat a diaeraskunk and down it with beer. I want my money back. I say no morea asd asd asd asd asd asd asd asd asd sad aw rswgf derg edrg retdg edrg drg drgdrg drg drg drg
  18. vasak
    Oct 4, 2016
    0
    The most big ridiculous ending game never seen....

    Bad Performance, maybe this game is developed under some type of drugs... cant understand how can they think, anyone want this.
  19. Dolfann23
    Nov 11, 2015
    9
    Black Ops 3 is a very enjoyable addition to the Call of Duty franchise. The zombies is the best it has ever been, and the multiplayer is very solid and the best since Black Ops 1. I feel the game does not deserve all these 0/10 reviews that hate on the game because of the title alone.
  20. Chizcakez
    Nov 11, 2015
    8
    To get the obligatory out of the way- Yes, this game is not optimized for PC. You may experience server crashes, framedrop issues or random disconnects. But when the game runs smoothly (which it does) its a really good experoence. You have lots of content, from Dead Ops Arcade to Gunsmith, the Multiplayer is motivating, the new specialists feel fresh, although i personally dont like someTo get the obligatory out of the way- Yes, this game is not optimized for PC. You may experience server crashes, framedrop issues or random disconnects. But when the game runs smoothly (which it does) its a really good experoence. You have lots of content, from Dead Ops Arcade to Gunsmith, the Multiplayer is motivating, the new specialists feel fresh, although i personally dont like some of the abillities (looking at you Rejack). Im really glad that they reduced the annoying jetpack bouncing by adding the fuel system and removed the buyable supply drops, because these things ruined AW. We all know its not innovative but its a big step in the right direction from CoD, since the last two titles were pretty much a disaster.
    Overall its a solid, fun game, with lots of content and good balance.    … Expand
  21. Hack
    Mar 8, 2016
    7
    It's Call of Duty so of course the user score is unjustly low and you should ignore it as it's not reflective of the quality of the game at all.

    I have played every game in the series on the PC and Black Ops III is definitely one of the best in recent years, and probably in the top 5 of all time. I have absolutely no issues with performance, running the game on high at 120fps 99.9% of    It's Call of Duty so of course the user score is unjustly low and you should ignore it as it's not reflective of the quality of the game at all.

    I have played every game in the series on the PC and Black Ops III is definitely one of the best in recent years, and probably in the top 5 of all time. I have absolutely no issues with performance, running the game on high at 120fps 99.9% of the time (i5 3570k @ 4.4GHz / GTX 970) and the anti cheat works much better than what's used by Infinity Ward and Sledgehammer Games, so the amount of blatant cheating is minimal in comparison. If you enjoy Call of Duty and have a decent computer you will enjoy Black Ops III, but if you dislike the series in general it won't change your mind.    … Expand
  22. Krypto_Dogg
    Nov 12, 2015
    6
    Campaign review: I'm actually not a CoD fan, but I enjoyed Ghosts and Advanced Warfare's story campaigns very much. They were among my top experiences of their respective years. Blops III's campaign makes no sense. I'm near the end and can't wait for it to be over. I was a few levels in when I realized they forgot to make me care. Even when the main character gets ripped apart it neverCampaign review: I'm actually not a CoD fan, but I enjoyed Ghosts and Advanced Warfare's story campaigns very much. They were among my top experiences of their respective years. Blops III's campaign makes no sense. I'm near the end and can't wait for it to be over. I was a few levels in when I realized they forgot to make me care. Even when the main character gets ripped apart it never leads me to a connection.

    I'm just going to chalk it up to Treyarch making bad campaigns that are too much like the older last-gen CoDs. I'll be expecting the next two CoDs to have stellar campaigns.    … Expand
  23. PinchytheLobby
    Nov 14, 2015
    10
    Giving it a 10 to even out the unfavourable reviews, I would give this game an 8/10, smooth motion and gun play. The campaign, multiplayer and zombie modes work well in unison, generally a good all round game to play when you want to relax.
  24. ChaosSS
    Nov 12, 2015
    9
    Обычная колда ничем не лучше и не хуже остальных. Баги, оптимизон? Поправят патчами. Хреновая русская локализация? Все с такой в этом году, даже Видьмак любимый. Что еще, движок старый? Зато можно поиграть на пастгэне. Сюжета нет? Есть кооп. Надоело будущее? Играйте скайрим.Обычная колда ничем не лучше и не хуже остальных. Баги, оптимизон? Поправят патчами. Хреновая русская локализация? Все с такой в этом году, даже Видьмак любимый. Что еще, движок старый? Зато можно поиграть на пастгэне. Сюжета нет? Есть кооп. Надоело будущее? Играйте скайрим.
  25. Agentbb007
    Nov 19, 2015
    10
    User Score 2.7? Really... This is what we've come to on Metacritic?? OK I think it's officially time for metacritic to get rid of the User Reviews. It shows how stupid we've become as a society...
  26. Ectogamut
    Nov 9, 2015
    9
    Not sure the terrible reviews are being fair to this game. This is an obvious step up from Black Ops 2. A very noticeable upgrade in the graphics...something lacking in many of the previous COD titles. And sure, the developers took a page from Titanfall with adding verticality to the game, but they did it well. Personally, I'm surprised at so many negative reviews considering that theNot sure the terrible reviews are being fair to this game. This is an obvious step up from Black Ops 2. A very noticeable upgrade in the graphics...something lacking in many of the previous COD titles. And sure, the developers took a page from Titanfall with adding verticality to the game, but they did it well. Personally, I'm surprised at so many negative reviews considering that the positives in BO3 seem to far outweigh the negative. So far, loving the game!… Expand
  27. supermanpopcorn
    Nov 11, 2015
    9
    German Review:

    'Bin eigentlich ein alter Battlefield Fan und muss sagen Black Ops 3 is wirklich gelungen. Es ist mein zweites Call of Duty und es hat mich sehr überrascht dass sich der Kauf derart gelohnt hat. Treyarch scheint wirklich zu wissen wie ein "geiles" Spiel aussieht. Nicht nur der Umfang ist echt groß, sondern die Qualität überzeugt. Ich spiel' auf dem PC und habe egentlich    German Review:

    'Bin eigentlich ein alter Battlefield Fan und muss sagen Black Ops 3 is wirklich gelungen. Es ist mein zweites Call of Duty und es hat mich sehr überrascht dass sich der Kauf derart gelohnt hat. Treyarch scheint wirklich zu wissen wie ein "geiles" Spiel aussieht. Nicht nur der Umfang ist echt groß, sondern die Qualität überzeugt. Ich spiel' auf dem PC und habe egentlich nur ein Problem, zudem komm ich aber gleich. Alleine das sogenannte Artdesign, sowohl auch die Musik in der Kampagne ist der Hammer! Es ist viel leichter immer alles schlecht zu reden anstatt Stärken zugestehen. Ich vergeb' hierfür 9 von 10 Punken weil die Maus anscheinend immer noch mit den "frames per second" verkoppelt ist. Wer bloß auf diese Idee kam ... naja dann halt einen Lock in den Optionen setzen.    … Expand
  28. zaninif
    Nov 9, 2015
    8
    In a nutshell, this is one of the best COD in years! It's a lot of fun: great gameplay (it's similar to AW but a bit better imho), lots of stuff to do (co-op and zombies!), and the graphics are not bad at all. I don't know if lag comp has been implemented this time, but if it has then it's much better than the previous installments. My latency to COD servers is about 30 ms, so I haveIn a nutshell, this is one of the best COD in years! It's a lot of fun: great gameplay (it's similar to AW but a bit better imho), lots of stuff to do (co-op and zombies!), and the graphics are not bad at all. I don't know if lag comp has been implemented this time, but if it has then it's much better than the previous installments. My latency to COD servers is about 30 ms, so I have always being penalized by lag comp for being close to servers - not anymore, apparently.

    Note that my rig is GTX 980 Ti, i7-2600, 500 GB SSD, 16 GB RAM, Fios 50/50 Mbps, and I'm in the NY metro area. Maybe because of my rig/location, I have not experienced any major issues. Sure, I lose connection sometimes, but it's not too often, and I'm sure it will be fixed soon.    … Expand
  29. Pescado
    Nov 23, 2015
    8
    Unlike Starwars Battlefront, it has a campaign. It's not perfect but I found it enjoyable. Zombie mode is fun, and the multiplayer is where it shines.
  30. Shodan92
    Nov 21, 2015
    9
    Best Call of Duty since Moder Warfare 2.

    Campaign is fun to play with friends. Multiplayer is really great.
    I haven't play Zombies yet, but from what I hear it's also fun.
  31. kbdig2
    Nov 6, 2015
    10
    awesome but I have no sound? :D great story missed with awesome and fun zombies and multiplayer. Black Ops III presents the most ambitious campaign yet.
  32. kkay
    Nov 7, 2015
    10
    The game is poorly optimized, it sure is. Im in a lucky 5% playing without any issues tho, and I liked the game since very start. This is a first CoD title for me, since CoD World at War, and I appreciate how big it is. Also, If you dont like how battlefield changed after 4, this game may just be for you. Regarding optimization~ Patches are on the way, so its not gonna stay in the sameThe game is poorly optimized, it sure is. Im in a lucky 5% playing without any issues tho, and I liked the game since very start. This is a first CoD title for me, since CoD World at War, and I appreciate how big it is. Also, If you dont like how battlefield changed after 4, this game may just be for you. Regarding optimization~ Patches are on the way, so its not gonna stay in the same state for long. Also, I really liked the specializations.… Expand
  33. MooseSpoon
    Nov 12, 2015
    7
    I see a lot of angry fanboys and keyboard warriors.

    I was pleasantly surprised by this game. The campaign though a bit short did offer a story that felt less like a typical COD game. The multiplayer is fun, but it seems the game punishes people who try to camp even in a tactical function. Performance issues are pretty rampant, but those can hopefully be fixed. COD is old and needs to go    I see a lot of angry fanboys and keyboard warriors.

    I was pleasantly surprised by this game. The campaign though a bit short did offer a story that felt less like a typical COD game. The multiplayer is fun, but it seems the game punishes people who try to camp even in a tactical function. Performance issues are pretty rampant, but those can hopefully be fixed. COD is old and needs to go in a new direction. I'm happy they tried to steer things a little differently with this one though it may not necessarily be in the right direction.    … Expand
  34. CENEGA
    Nov 6, 2015
    10
    The best Call of duty that I played.
    Nice multiplayer.
    Nice Zombies.
    Nice graphic.
    Great port.
    and new modes such as nightmare and free run and with the modding tools coming next time it will be even better.
    Good Job Treyarch
  35. thedarklordya
    Nov 6, 2015
    9
    Easily the best COD to date. Better than its predecessors on the next gen in every way possible. Multiplayer maps have a great size and the zombie's map is huge, possibly too big.
  36. Blackcesar
    Nov 10, 2015
    7
    As always when speaking about COD, we see al kinds of **** in the user reviews. Don't trust people who are putting 0 either 10, they are both fanboys or haters, so avoid at all costs.
    This COD is all about content. You have 2 main campaigns in 4 co-op, they are both forgettable in terms of story but finally playing them in 4 makes all the point A to point B travel fun, hopefully from now    As always when speaking about COD, we see al kinds of **** in the user reviews. Don't trust people who are putting 0 either 10, they are both fanboys or haters, so avoid at all costs.
    This COD is all about content. You have 2 main campaigns in 4 co-op, they are both forgettable in terms of story but finally playing them in 4 makes all the point A to point B travel fun, hopefully from now on they will keep making them like this.
    Zombies I tried them a few times and seems like the best zombie experience to date, though I have to fully explore all the settings in any case well polished mode.
    Multiplayer is kinda of weird. First I have a lot of problems in aiming, due to the high mobility of all the players, so many times I'm going around just with hip fire. There are problems of lag although you can finally see your ping by pressing Tab, still something doesn't feel right and I guess they will optimized the netcode because some times is infuriating to shoot and not kill with a full clip and to be killed with few shots.
    Multiplayer maps (like always) I quite forgettable apart from 2-3 and unfortunately BO2 maps were much better at launch, still they need to sell DLC so I'm not surprised any more.
    Weird is that the thing AW made right (maybe one of the only ones) was the verticality of the maps, in this game there really unexplainable walls and you want to go across them but you cannot and it's stupid and limits the movement of the maps.
    Technically speaking we finally see some colors specially yellow, and the lighting is well done, some textures are bland and dunno if it is for the graphics card (MSI 970) or the game itself. In any case they are nice, still they could do better for a next gen title. Keep in mind that this is probably a porting from the consoles, so they will always based the game on their perfomances.
    To conlcude, BO3 is a huge game is terms of content, you will play for a long time if you interested in the mechanics of a fast-paced multiplayer with typical series lag problematics, forgettable campaign and awesome zombie mode.
    Advice: find 3 buddies and have fun.    … Expand
  37. BrownManYash
    Nov 10, 2015
    8
    I'm not a fan of CoD. I play CS:GO and Warframe and Ghost Recon Phantoms and Halo. I enjoy tactical play, but a bit of illogical play too. I've never put more than 40 or 50 hours in a CoD game before. I'm telling you this, so people don't call me a fanboy, because I the polar opposite.

    MY SCORE IS BASED ON IF THE PROBLEMS WITH MULTIPLAYER GET FIXED. First off, I just want to get this    I'm not a fan of CoD. I play CS:GO and Warframe and Ghost Recon Phantoms and Halo. I enjoy tactical play, but a bit of illogical play too. I've never put more than 40 or 50 hours in a CoD game before. I'm telling you this, so people don't call me a fanboy, because I the polar opposite.

    MY SCORE IS BASED ON IF THE PROBLEMS WITH MULTIPLAYER GET FIXED.

    First off, I just want to get this off my mind. This game is graphically intensive, and it should be. We're at a time where graphics and gameplay are a huge deal, and we're at the 2+ GB VRAM requirement for these new AAA games. This game maxed out on 1080p hit 4+ VRAM usage on the CAMPAIGN (I have a gtx 970, so i ran a couple functions at medium and high instead of extra). I was pushing 3+ GB VRAM usage in multiplayer on higher end graphics. I do realize there are some performance issues for even gtx 980 ti for this game, but thy should be cleared soon with a couple of patches coming in.

    Another year, another CoD. However this time, we're back to Black Ops. And man it feels good. After the past 2 sub-par games (well, Ghosts was a tragedy), Black Ops 3 picks back up the seemingly dying franchise. Campaign is actually interesting and has damn good twists and secrets (as are the other Black Ops). And having a second campaign is a good addition, and its kind of creepy. And for the people confused by the campaign: Please stop thinking black ops is a mindless shooter fps storyline. Use your brains, and stop mocking the game if you can't "read between the lines" or if you're not willing to think for once (I know I'm being offensive, but it's frustrating to know that this good story is belittled by people who cannot use their brains. There's so much to this story!)

    Zombies? I don't know, since I'm actually afraid of zombies and I haven't played it (ya I'm a wimp, deal with it). But it looks different from the others.

    Multiplayer provides smoother play than the last 2 really fast paced CoD games. And hell, it may be a bit similar in terms of Titanfall parkour, but hey, it isn't a bad addition. And the maps are back to the 3-lanes design, as I believe they should be. HOWEVER, we are having MAJOR performance issues with the game, and the wave of hackers that every fps game has. BUT PEOPLE, THE GAME CAME OUT RECENTLY!!! GIVE TREYARCH SOME TIME FOR PATCHES! And you do realize that Treyarch is giving us PC players modding tools, an exclusive to us only! Funny thing is, this kind of negativity is present on so many new games that have recently come out (cough cough Witcher 3, Dragon Age, Fallout 4). Give the developers some slack. Standards for quality games are rising every year, and game developers put in so much time and money for these games to keep us players happy. There will be bugs and glitches at release. It's inevitable, but as players start pointing out these errors, the developers will make patches. So please people, give some time, and the major problems will be gone.

    All in all, I enjoy this game. Whether I want to lay off some steam, want some mindless shooting, or just want to relax, this game is worth it. I will try out SnD soon, and hopefully it plays as tactically as CS:GO.

    My first review,
    Yash    … Expand
  38. Voxel_Fox
    Nov 6, 2015
    9
    I Haven't been happy with a call of duty game since the first Black Ops. I am extremely enjoying my time in Black Ops 3! I havn't had any problems with framerate, and it looks and plays damn fine.
  39. Thiago145
    Nov 6, 2015
    10
    Best Call of Duty ever,it delivers an amazing experience with a great port from Treyarch.
    People may found some FPS drops in the campaign especially if you are using a i5,however PCDEV already said that they are working on a fix for those issues
  40. Meshuggener
    Nov 6, 2015
    9
    If that was the first call of duty game, there would be no COD haters and would be more appreciated...
    This is a multiplayer game; i havent finished the campain...I love it ! ...may be a little expensive (80$) but
    considering i m gonna play it for few hundred hours, its no big deal then...If you want fast and fun multi fps with nice graphics, buy it ! ; )
  41. Knutz
    Nov 6, 2015
    9
    I'm giving this a 9 because it is the best COD I've played. BO1 was great, BO2 was meh, but this is by far the best! Ignore these previous negative reviewers overwhelmingly giving it 0-1's. E.T(atari from the 80's). deserved a 0-1, but not this. The least it should get is a 7.5 and that's a solid statement. They're just BF converts now upset that it's not BF...That's all. EveryoneI'm giving this a 9 because it is the best COD I've played. BO1 was great, BO2 was meh, but this is by far the best! Ignore these previous negative reviewers overwhelmingly giving it 0-1's. E.T(atari from the 80's). deserved a 0-1, but not this. The least it should get is a 7.5 and that's a solid statement. They're just BF converts now upset that it's not BF...That's all. Everyone knows COD is the worst gaming community when it comes to the genre, so take their reviews with a grain of salt. We all should know this by now.
    It's COD, what'd you expect?! They've got a lot of new elements to the game, it seems to run and feel solid both graphically and responsive to controls. I haven't had any of the issues that the others are talking about. One guy didn't even play it after messing with the settings for 2hrs...but gave it a 1 or something like that. Hateful community!!
    As I've stated...It's COD, it's going to look, feel and sound like COD, but I like the new elements they threw into it. Last COD I played was BO2, so maybe take that into consideration. It's a good game and I feel I got what I paid for, but I also knew what to expect....I wasn't blown away, but definitely better than what I had expected.
    AMD 4100
    Nvidia gtx 560TI
    8gb ram
    Windows 7 64.    … Expand
  42. mintlo
    Apr 13, 2016
    8
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I picked up the game a few months after its release and had a difficult time adjusting to the new game mechanics of thrusting but after getting better at it I enjoy the new challenges with attacking and defending given the new physics. I'm only talking about the multiplayer portion as I haven't tried the story mode or zombies mode, they don't really interest me as I prefer the challenge of playing against human opponents. After purchasing the game I saw there was a brief sale offering only the multiplayer portion of the game and I wish that I would have had this purchase option from the get go. There is a limited player base for PC and I wish they would offer the multiplayer only so as to increase the player base or perfect cross platform play so PC players could play against Xbox and/or Playstation players. Another issue I have is that instead of showing how many players are active in the BO3 they show a percentage of total players active in a particular game mode.
    Another issue of contention is scarcity of special one-shot kill weapons that can only be obtained by crates. I think I know why they chose to do this-scarcity increases demand which caused people to either purchase COD points or play longer in order to be able to get more crates. However, it is very frustrating to continually play and get killed by the over powered special weapons meanwhile continually striking out on receiving the special weapons. I'm not going to purchase COD points - I feel that micro transactions such as these are unethical and the creators of the game should be ashamed of themselves. You are taking advantage of peoples addictive behavior in order to deprive them of money and enrich yourselves in the process. Maybe that's a metaphor for the capitalist paradigm we live in and it's certainly a first world problem. You know this has got me thinking. I'm going to sell everything I own and join the peace corp. Thanks for helping wake me up economic inequalities in the world Treyarch.    … Expand
  43. Vertran187
    Nov 11, 2015
    5
    Best COD since MW2 but still pretty bad get it 2nd hand in my opinion MP is **** unless you have a perfect internet connection ur hate it.
    SP was like COD vs Halo mix up weird dumb and short like the last few games.
  44. Jacsam
    Feb 18, 2016
    8
    I do not like multiplayer. I bought the game for the single player experience. I thought the graphics and game play were very good. It also had some interesting weapons. I do not think a game has to reinvent itself every time it comes out. This game is a solid FPS and if you like call of duty then you will enjoy this game.
  45. Mahdiar
    Feb 18, 2016
    7
    Gameplay : 7
    Graphics : 7
    Story : 8
    Sound : 8
    **********************************************************************************
    Overall : 7
  46. Munkey
    Nov 26, 2015
    5
    Treyarch why? You had three years to make a good CoD and you failed...
    Campaign is boring and still really a corridor based shooter. You can go vertically up or down but the levels are still just corridors strung together. Story for me was very boring and doesn't really expand the Black Ops universe and the previous build up from BO1 and BO2 was wasted. No back story to the campaign why    Treyarch why? You had three years to make a good CoD and you failed...
    Campaign is boring and still really a corridor based shooter. You can go vertically up or down but the levels are still just corridors strung together. Story for me was very boring and doesn't really expand the Black Ops universe and the previous build up from BO1 and BO2 was wasted. No back story to the campaign why there was the disaster, why the world is in chaos and why in the first mission we need to save some dude? No back story.
    Multiplayer is just Advanced Warfare but without the exosuit. Played it but there is nothing new to be honest. Yes the classes with the passive and offensive ability is good but that's it. Maps are diverse and good looking but still on PC lags and cheaters as usual.
    The only thing that saves this game from a very low score is the Zombie Mode. Again Treyarch does this mode like champs. Zombies are just so good. The look, the voices and the sounds are just amazing. Whoever designed it should get a raise because it's great.
    For the price you get a lot single, multi and zombies but for me only the Zombie part is worth while.
    I thing people had enough of future shooters. Would really like to play a World War II shooter again or something like the first Black Ops which to this day is my personal best CoD.
    Final score for CoD:BO3 is a 5 out of 10.    … Expand
  47. Toothlessninja
    Feb 5, 2016
    6
    As you can see from the user score, a lot of people don't seem to like this game. Mostly due to the bad PC port (which they have since fixed) and the graphics (they wanted to create a game that could run on 2gb cards so everyone could play). I'm here to tell you that the game isn't that bad. It's not a game I'd call "legendary" by any means, but it's not another Ride to Hell: RetributionAs you can see from the user score, a lot of people don't seem to like this game. Mostly due to the bad PC port (which they have since fixed) and the graphics (they wanted to create a game that could run on 2gb cards so everyone could play). I'm here to tell you that the game isn't that bad. It's not a game I'd call "legendary" by any means, but it's not another Ride to Hell: Retribution like everyone is calling it.

    -Graphics and port job-
    I will admit, at release, this game ran like a slideshow on high end pc's. Now after NUMEROUS patches, the game runs flawlessly. I always ran above 60+ fps maxed out 1080p on a lower end pc (AMD FX-6300 and Radeon 7970). They clearly took the time to fix their mistakes and create a good running game now.

    -Story-
    The story is... ok at best. It's another one of those "robots kill humans" and "terrorist" plots that you see every other game. It's not really worth the play if you want to play campaign. It's clear that the focus was on the other gamemodes and NOT the story.
    One thing that I do like is the fact that it is multiplayer. If you want, you can go through the whole campaign with your friends. It'll get a few laughs out of you and your friends playing, even if it is cheesy.

    -Zombies-
    One. Map. ONE. MAP. Seriously, GimmieMoneyArch? Yup. There's only one map. Unless you buy the $50 season pass to fuel their Lamborghinis as they swim in money, you only get one map. The season pass isn't even that good right now, it just comes with The Giant from World at War with some updated graphics. Lazy.
    They did make a lot of changes to the gamemode though. It's a lot for someone who just touched zombies previously to have all of this information shoved in their face at once. It's quite a bit to absorb. Nonetheless, it's fun and got a few hours out of me, but it's nothing to throw $60 at for.

    -Nightmare mode-
    This was a lazy attempt for people to play the campaign again, but with zombies thrown in. They don't even change the cutscenes! They just mute the audio from them and slap a narration bit up! It's so lazy to see that they did this. When the game said "zombie campaign", I expected a whole campaign about zombies taking over the world and complex character development (like The Walking Dead or other zombie stories), but I got WAY to ahead of myself. It's also boring and repetitive to just kill nothing but the same zombie over levels you already played.

    -Multiplayer-
    This was where the game shines. The shining crown. I put over 200+ hours into this game after about a month of playing. It's a TON of fun and probably the only reason I bought this game.
    There are now classes or "specialists" as the game calls them, that now diversify play a bit. Each specialist can choose 2 abilities to use that can give them either a weapon or a small advantage for a short period. The classes don't have any personality though. All of them are serious and not funny. Nothing like Team Fortress 2, where each class had a different fun personality. It would've been nice to give the characters some kind of personality besides "Nomad, KIA" and "Ruin, KIA". They had so much potential to put tons of funny character quotes or quips that would've made me remember the characters apart from what they occasionally do every 2 minutes.
    As for balance of weapons, they need to fix them. Some of the weapons are straight up overpowered. The P-06, Sheiva, pretty much all smgs, Haymaker, and the Brecci, just to name a few.
    There are only 12 maps (not including the Nuketown for pre-orders only). Most of them are good and have a lot of ramps and walls for jetpacks. Also, I noticed a lot less camping by allowing almost every part of the map to have 2 entrances to eliminate camping. Sure there were still campers, but rarely any.
    Speaking of the jetpack, it's a really nice feature I'm glad they carried over from Advanced Warfare. I didn't play AW, but from what I've seen and heard from others, it was nice to have a lot more mobility so combat is a lot more diverse.

    -Final verdict-
    I kept playing. I don't know why, but despite all of these flaws, I kept playing. I put over 200+ hours in alone and that for me is enough to justify a $60 purchase.    … Expand
  48. adriandenan
    May 16, 2016
    7
    It's another CoD game. If you like CoD and want the newest stuff, then yeah it's worth it. It feels like Titanfall without the Titans, which is still enjoyable but still lacking some giant robots.
  49. Bunnyhunter
    Nov 29, 2015
    10
    Best cod with cod4, BO and BO2. very good graphics, run smoothly on my pc all at full settings, no lag (or VERY rarely). The multi is superb. Great zombie and very entertaining campaign.
    some specialist weapons are useless on hardcore, best played in core mod.
    cherry on the cake : mod tools on 2016 with dedi private servers ! This Treyarch guys know how to make a good pc cod, don't be    Best cod with cod4, BO and BO2. very good graphics, run smoothly on my pc all at full settings, no lag (or VERY rarely). The multi is superb. Great zombie and very entertaining campaign.
    some specialist weapons are useless on hardcore, best played in core mod.
    cherry on the cake : mod tools on 2016 with dedi private servers !
    This Treyarch guys know how to make a good pc cod, don't be fooled by this user scoring, watch pc cod youtubers, they are all enjoying it.    … Expand
  50. leopoldo
    Dec 3, 2015
    7
    Call of Duty: Black Ops III was a game I was very excited before the release because everything in BO2 was great, but unfortunately was not what happened in that game. The story has no connection with the BO2, but at least it is Ok. The gameplay in the campaign is very simple, with nothing remarkable or different. At least the multiplayer is great fun, even remembering very AdvancedCall of Duty: Black Ops III was a game I was very excited before the release because everything in BO2 was great, but unfortunately was not what happened in that game. The story has no connection with the BO2, but at least it is Ok. The gameplay in the campaign is very simple, with nothing remarkable or different. At least the multiplayer is great fun, even remembering very Advanced Warfare, but has very leg.O zombies mode is better than ever. Call of Duty: Black Ops III could be one of the best CoD, but uninteresting campaign, and the leg of the game will not let that happen, at least the zombies mode is incredible. 7/10… Expand
  51. Ridash
    May 7, 2016
    7
    A fun multiplayer shooter to play with friends. Fine amount of maps which have pretty good design and don't get boring easily. The zombie mode is still the same as before, just on another map, which is actually a good thing. It also has splitscreen in every mode possible, including the campaign, though the campaign is painfully cringe worthy and not worth a singe play.

    As for the    A fun multiplayer shooter to play with friends. Fine amount of maps which have pretty good design and don't get boring easily. The zombie mode is still the same as before, just on another map, which is actually a good thing. It also has splitscreen in every mode possible, including the campaign, though the campaign is painfully cringe worthy and not worth a singe play.

    As for the performance, it's actually very good now and the people complaining about it are most likely coming from the launch of the game.    … Expand
  52. darek79r19
    Nov 22, 2015
    5
    Jako fan COD'a, którego ogrywam zawsze od pierwszej części powiem krótko: daję 10 za story i 0 za gameplay. Ani strzelanie w roboty, ani w zombi nie jest tym, co w tej grze powinno się znaleźć. Można powiedzieć, że zombi można olać... Otóż nie można. W singlu mamy wszystko, choćby przez chwilę, ale musieli upchać tam wszystko i przydeptać. Strzelanie do robotów jest czymś nawet gorszym odJako fan COD'a, którego ogrywam zawsze od pierwszej części powiem krótko: daję 10 za story i 0 za gameplay. Ani strzelanie w roboty, ani w zombi nie jest tym, co w tej grze powinno się znaleźć. Można powiedzieć, że zombi można olać... Otóż nie można. W singlu mamy wszystko, choćby przez chwilę, ale musieli upchać tam wszystko i przydeptać. Strzelanie do robotów jest czymś nawet gorszym od zombi. Strzelasz w ślamazarne roboty jak w tarczę, czasem zdarzy się, że robot odskoczy, po czym znowu ślamazarnie prze do przodu jak golem. Zero taktyki !!!! SI nie istnieje, zachowanie opiera się na jednym skrypcie!!! Tak monotonnego trzymania palca na spuście powstydził by się chyba nawet Serious Sam.
    Co do story, to pomysł nie był najgorszy, wręcz powiedział bym, że powiało świerzością, na coś takiego czekałem. Jednak zamiast skupić się na story i rozwinąć temat o agencje rządowe, obecną sytuację na świecie twórcy, skupili się na opowiadaniu nam krótkiej historyjki w rozwleczony sposób. Szkoda, mogło być dobrze a wyszło jak zawsze. Natomiast psychodela, jaką zaserwowali nam pod koniec ( efekt z ptakami), odradzanie zastrzelonych wrogów, to coś, co nigdy nie powinno znaleźć się w tego typu grze. Gameplay poległ, wytrwałem do końca dla story i nie chcę więcej tej gry oglądać.    … Expand
  53. Tgc
    Nov 16, 2015
    5
    It really depends what are your expectations. If you want a decent FPS you will be disappointed. If you want b-genre interactive action movie then you could be satisfied.
  54. Bobk
    Dec 26, 2015
    8
    I don't know why people hate this game so much. It is another Call Of Duty tittle so not much has changed but it is still way better that Advanced Warfare and it can't be compared to the absolute disater Ghosts. The game offers a lot of content, from guns to perks to specialists. I would give it a third spot in the franchise ,right after Black Ops 2 and COD 4: MW.
  55. hdlswaglord
    Nov 10, 2015
    6
    First, don't pay attention to the guys who spam 10/10s or 0/10s, cause they are just biased AF. Here is my take on black ops 3. The multiplayer is solid, with great weapon balancing and specialists character changing how the game is played... although I will say that character customization feels like something they tacked on at the last minute. Zombies is still as good as ever, theFirst, don't pay attention to the guys who spam 10/10s or 0/10s, cause they are just biased AF. Here is my take on black ops 3. The multiplayer is solid, with great weapon balancing and specialists character changing how the game is played... although I will say that character customization feels like something they tacked on at the last minute. Zombies is still as good as ever, the campaign, its co-op, and the nightmare mode add plenty to the overall package, while the currently barebones freerun mode can be beaten within 20 minutes. However, the PC port is poor compared to the console. You may want to take a raincheck on this game while they fix the problems with the port and add modding support… Expand
  56. grimmzy
    Nov 13, 2015
    5
    Honestly would be quite fun if it wasn't for god awful PC optimization, the only people that don't agree with this are mindless fanboys, the release state was horrible, it uses unjustifiable amounts of resources on any graphical setting, and as of a week later still no patch or acknowledgement from the devs.
  57. lasn
    Mar 4, 2016
    8
    The game had a bad launch, but it was fixed pretty fast (for me atleast). I think that is the reason for the low user score. 2.7 out of 10 is absolutely too low. Game is alot of fun.

    My first COD game. I have over 150 hours played now. Well worth the money.
  58. wonderirani
    Nov 21, 2015
    6
    Its a good game. Very powerful Graphics which caught my attention, story line was good better than black ops 2 and modern warfare. Its shift of story line was good and could become better mostly the last mission could become better and more fun but was not. Plz the developers must try to extend the story line in a adventures way. Overall goo game but not the best on Call Of duty franchise.Its a good game. Very powerful Graphics which caught my attention, story line was good better than black ops 2 and modern warfare. Its shift of story line was good and could become better mostly the last mission could become better and more fun but was not. Plz the developers must try to extend the story line in a adventures way. Overall goo game but not the best on Call Of duty franchise.
    Best of luck.    … Expand
  59. mrmatthew
    Jan 21, 2016
    7
    I thought this was a fun game until I kept dying. It is a little too hard I think! The controls and the stamina you have is not enough. If they only had more life in the characters it would be a great game!!
  60. GaryGeneral
    Jan 27, 2016
    10
    Having spent thousands of hours of my life on Multiplayer in various Call of Duty games (and other shooters, sadly), I feel I'm qualified to rate this game. Second best Call of Duty ever- Black ops 1 was top, this is next. The vertical nature is under control (unlike Advanced warfare), the guns are great, maps small and intense. What else could you want? Except more people playing on PC toHaving spent thousands of hours of my life on Multiplayer in various Call of Duty games (and other shooters, sadly), I feel I'm qualified to rate this game. Second best Call of Duty ever- Black ops 1 was top, this is next. The vertical nature is under control (unlike Advanced warfare), the guns are great, maps small and intense. What else could you want? Except more people playing on PC to get more games running (eg no one ever plays gun game???) Dedicated servers and competitive mod will cement this as a serious alternative to CS:GO… Expand
  61. Kmodo
    Feb 9, 2016
    10
    Black Ops are the only CoD's we play these days due to being the only one with dedicated servers and graphics options you just come to expect on PC e.g. 120fov and not 65fov on MW3 lol.

    Hundreds of hours in previous Black Ops and currently 110hours BO3 so far which is pretty decent for a very casual gamer these days :D It's just a fun game to play, whether have 30mins free over hours    Black Ops are the only CoD's we play these days due to being the only one with dedicated servers and graphics options you just come to expect on PC e.g. 120fov and not 65fov on MW3 lol.

    Hundreds of hours in previous Black Ops and currently 110hours BO3 so far which is pretty decent for a very casual gamer these days :D

    It's just a fun game to play, whether have 30mins free over hours and even though we buy most new games (star wars, r6s etc) this will stay our go to game till the next Black Ops ;D    … Expand
  62. Shaedrin
    Apr 18, 2016
    6
    While I have not played any of the previous COD games, this one really just seemed quite "meh" for me.

    I didn't have any of the lag or lock up issues on my system, and my rig is far from OP (Asus Z77 Sabeertooth / i7-3570K / MSI GTX 970 4g), and even with my rig I was still able to run at full graphics options with no performance issue....even ran 60+ fps the entire time. My biggest    While I have not played any of the previous COD games, this one really just seemed quite "meh" for me.

    I didn't have any of the lag or lock up issues on my system, and my rig is far from OP (Asus Z77 Sabeertooth / i7-3570K / MSI GTX 970 4g), and even with my rig I was still able to run at full graphics options with no performance issue....even ran 60+ fps the entire time.

    My biggest beef was with the gameplay. The story was interesting, and had just enough of a twist that I saw coming but didn't mind when it happened. But....some of these missions are HELLA long!!! Literally spent almost 45 minutes on a single mission in campaign...now while many will ask "you want a short game then?"....no. I don't want short, but at the same time, having a single run last almost an hour is a bit much.

    The AI difficulty needs to be looked at as well. Even running through the campaign the first time on "I'm a wimp" mode, I was still finding myself regularly getting dead. Mostly from the robots in the game. And don't even get me started on the assault on the last mission. ENDLESS WAVES OF ROBOTS between you and your objective to simply hack a door.

    All in all though, it was fairly solid. Will I be playing it again? Maybe in a few months when I get bored of World of Warships or something else. Until then...I will go back to Mass Effect 2.    … Expand
  63. elolugo
    Nov 15, 2019
    5
    Pretty average campaign with some cool features like customization and coop
  64. VigilanteOito
    Jan 27, 2021
    3
    Eu curti todos os COD que joguei, mas esse não tem como.
    Pior campanha, personagens sem graça alguma, historia nada haver.
    Bugs e bugs.
  65. twinklyten
    Jan 25, 2020
    8
    Mechanically inferior to black ops 4 but the enjoyable although bad campaign and quality offline ai award it a similar score
  66. SoggyBread4199
    Feb 13, 2020
    8
    Black Ops III has a decent campaign, a great multiplayer and an amazing zombies mode that's easily the best out of all of them. I'd give campaign a 7/10, multiplayer an 8/10 and zombies a 9/10.
  67. N0ri_K1dden
    Jul 1, 2020
    0
    поезд сделал бум. Слава Шевцову! Слава Банану! Слава библейским отсылкам!
  68. Mattie
    May 23, 2023
    6
    Gameplay - 6/10
    Graphics - 6/10
    Performance - 8/10
    Story - 2/10

    Total score - 5,5/10
  69. Shekky
    Nov 3, 2016
    3
    This game is a total rip off of titanfall 2 without the mechs portion. The Gameplay is somewhat decent but still in the same boat of futuristic shooter that is not at all what activision should be working on.
  70. ultraviper
    Sep 10, 2019
    3
    I only played this for the single player and it was buggy as all hell. I would get lag. In single player. Not talking about frames per second or video here, but actual lag. The game kept telling me "connection interrupted" which is very strange because I only ever used the "play offline" option from the game's main menu.

    Another big bug happens the game gets paused. Yes, pausing the    I only played this for the single player and it was buggy as all hell. I would get lag. In single player. Not talking about frames per second or video here, but actual lag. The game kept telling me "connection interrupted" which is very strange because I only ever used the "play offline" option from the game's main menu.

    Another big bug happens the game gets paused. Yes, pausing the game, something that basically every game in the last 30 years has managed to implement without screwing the game up, will screw the game up. Scripted cutscenes will continue playing while paused, or will fail to play when the game is unpaused. Unpausing also makes animations of enemies stop playing and they just float around frozen.

    Also... why the ops gotta be black?    … Expand
  71. Tomle1202
    Mar 18, 2017
    6
    The story that Call of Duty: Black Ops III tries to offer the complicatedness expected from a Black Ops game, but the way Treyarch delivers such attraction is just as unappealing as its missed potentials and horrific optimization.
  72. tangosucka
    Jan 19, 2017
    5
    When advanced warfare was released back in 2014, i thought it was okay, not great, but okay, if only i had known what horror i would diving into the next year, call of duty black ops 3 is a game that suffers from bad writing, awful dialog and voice acting reminiscent of a low budget 80s action movie, the multiplayer is pretty much the same as advanced warfare, but you can now make yourWhen advanced warfare was released back in 2014, i thought it was okay, not great, but okay, if only i had known what horror i would diving into the next year, call of duty black ops 3 is a game that suffers from bad writing, awful dialog and voice acting reminiscent of a low budget 80s action movie, the multiplayer is pretty much the same as advanced warfare, but you can now make your character dance at the end of a match, we asked for improvement and this is what they give us -_- the campaign pretty much has nothing to do with the first two games and the characters are incredibly boring and underdeveloped, as well as completely irrelevant to the first two games, in a more technical point of view, the game seems to run just fine on the ps4, it mostly runs at 60fps but occasionally drops to 30 when things get hectic, the pc version from what i can tell is badly optimised and performs poorly even on up to date hardware, the last gen versions are multiplayer and zombies only, and are terrible, the graphics are even worst than the pc version at lowest settings, the resolution seems to somewhere around 480p, and the game seems to run between 60 and 2fps, the framerate is so inconsistent, id be better off playing the game through a slide projector, do not buy the last gen versions unless you buy it for extremely cheap or have way too much money, overall black ops 3 is completely irrelevant to the first two games, the multiplayer is average, and the game has a few technical issues, would i recommend it? If your a cod fan then the game might be worth it, but for me, it was a complete waste of 60 quid… Expand
  73. jelikey
    Nov 4, 2016
    7
    Another AAA game with severe technical issues?! Wow, just... wow. How this stuff continues to get released is baffling, and completely unacceptable. The game itself is decent if you can run it properly. It adds a few new, interesting things, but ultimately doesn't expand beyond what we expect from a typical COD game.
  74. SuperkenGaming
    Jul 10, 2018
    8
    Call of Duty Black Ops III
    Probably the most complete game in the series
    We all play call of duty games for different reasons, and all of those reasons are present in black ops 3, theres zombies mode for the gamer girls and teenage boys with 14 different maps to get your wave mode on, theres multiplayer with its jetpacks and sliding and wall climbing with all of the classic modes, pretty    Call of Duty Black Ops III
    Probably the most complete game in the series
    We all play call of duty games for different reasons, and all of those reasons are present in black ops 3, theres zombies mode for the gamer girls and teenage boys with 14 different maps to get your wave mode on, theres multiplayer with its jetpacks and sliding and wall climbing with all of the classic modes, pretty decent maps, but theres a destiny like addition with these moves you can pull of tht recharge as you play through the match, and there are multiple different moves for you to choose from to change strategies fo different match types.. I don’t really have much to say about the multiplayer because its not really what I play for, its fun, its addictive. But im here for the campaign which is where this special move is pulled from…
    And I was pleasantly surprised with what we get here with black ops 3..
    This isn’t my favorite campaign in the series, but I feel this campaign is by far the coolest.. it doesn’t even feel like a call of duty campaign, this could’ve easily been a standalone ip as it tells the story of man vs machine, and this campaign is a hefty 10 hours long give or take depending on the difficulty, I played half of the campaign on easy and half of it on hard..
    And this campaign does so many cool things..
    at the beginning of the store a robot just rips you apart so you spend the rest of the game as an augmented human, but of course the agments and the dni is being messed with, controlling the minds of your comrads, you spend the game trying to get to the bottom of this…
    With these augments youre able to do crazy things, each mission you cn choose if you want moves for control, chaos, or combat.. I played mostly with chaos as I felt there was an equal balance of attacks I could use against humans as well as robots, also It allows you to unleash these fireflied that eat the humans in your wy and you get to sing the fireflies song while they do that..
    but there are multiple ways you can playthrough this campaign thanks to these controls, such as hackig everything and taking control watch dogs style if youd like…
    the first half of the campaign I felt to be pretty soulless though..
    I felt like I was really just going through the motions.. but as the story goes on things just get weirder and weirder an I would have to stop myself to remind myself that this is indeed a call of duty game..
    and a war vs robots.. they play with illusions and memories here, its nice to see that the team was let of the leash and allowed to be free, and they crated something truly unique..
    Though this campaign does suffer pacing problems and annoyances if you are playing on higher difficulties..
    Checkpoints can be infuriating at times and theres this giant wall of garbage in the final chapter that I just couldn’t take anymore on hard because of its infinite spawning drones and robots.. this mission felt completely unbalanced for the difficulty, its jus just not fun or fair to have infinite drones that can kill you in 1 or 2 his while youre trying to weaken a larger enemy yards away to get in one rocket shot at a time with no progress being saved while you do this.. on top of that friendly fire is on and your team mates will run in front of you instantly failing the mission..
    I just didn’t have the patience AFTER CHIPPING away at this mission for what was at least an hour…
    though this was the only section of the game that I found to be unfair and unbalanced..
    I didn’t necessarily have fun with this campaign, but I ultimately appreciate it for trying new things
    showing players that call of duty is its buttery smooth shooting more than its military focus don’t get me wrong, this is still a military based campaign.. but its so far in the background that you hardly notice, I wouldn’t mind if call of duty contined to let one of its teams play around with its campaigns like it did here and actually step away from military a but, I dubt that would happen, but with this game I see the possibility..
    I give Call of Duty Black Ops 3
    a 7.5/10    … Expand
  75. tarcom
    May 11, 2016
    3
    人がいなすぎてTDMとドミネ以外はプレイできません
    このゲームだけじゃなく、call of dutyシリーズは毎回こんな状態。
    いい加減アクティビジョンはテコ入れするべき。
    売り逃げして恥ずかしくないのか？
  76. YoloSwag4Doge
    Jul 13, 2016
    9
    It's true that the regurgitated CoD releases year after year can get rather tiresome, but I've got to give major props to this installment. Treyark has really become their own and I find their CoD installments have much better quality and ingenuity in general than Activision's. I've noticed that Activision has been adopting a lot of Treyark originals like Zombies, enhanced abilities andIt's true that the regurgitated CoD releases year after year can get rather tiresome, but I've got to give major props to this installment. Treyark has really become their own and I find their CoD installments have much better quality and ingenuity in general than Activision's. I've noticed that Activision has been adopting a lot of Treyark originals like Zombies, enhanced abilities and futuristic weaponry over the years.

    While the CoD multiplayer is essentially just more of the same, the campaign is very well done. You won't find the notorious CoD element of endlessly spawning enemies that basically force you to always be charging through gun fire in order to advance. Instead BO3 offers well designed levels with engaging fire fight environments and some rather neat extras. The super human jumping, running and special abilities are very well done and I personally find it much more fun than Advanced Warfare's titanfall mechanics.

    All in all, anyone who's bored silly of the CoD experience isn't going to find anything exceptional in BO3. But to anyone who's still got a bit of the CoD spirit in them, I highly recommend BO3 for the overall improved combat, characters and level design. Also the the game is well optimized and runs at steady frame rate.

    (As a side note I found a couple of the voice actors a bit lacking in their performance, but for the most part the voice acting is quite good).    … Expand
  77. muzmuz
    Jan 27, 2018
    4
    A technical unoptimized cesspit of a Call of Duty game with generic/incomprehensive story line, clunky controls, and disappointing gameplay.
  78. LimitedEdition
    Mar 7, 2020
    4
    Singleplayer has a bad story and a very boring, repetitive setting. The new gameplay elements do not really enrich the game but rather make the overall gaming experience more inconstistent. Multiplayer is not really to recommend these days anymore, as player count is too low for having a solid reliable experience matchmaking-wise.
  79. MegamanAT
    Oct 28, 2016
    1
    By far the most stupid, idiotic game I have ever played! The story is so dump, that I got headaches, even when skipping every single cut scene as fast as possible. I forced myself to finish it only because of the 30 bucks I have spent for it. It was a horrible torture! And whenever I thought it's over and I am ready to uninstall it, another dumb ass mission had to be run through -> ABy far the most stupid, idiotic game I have ever played! The story is so dump, that I got headaches, even when skipping every single cut scene as fast as possible. I forced myself to finish it only because of the 30 bucks I have spent for it. It was a horrible torture! And whenever I thought it's over and I am ready to uninstall it, another dumb ass mission had to be run through -> A nightmare!

    Can' wait for Infinite Warfare! ;-) I am already counting the days! :-D

    BTW: Graphics are fine.    … Expand
  80. miccael
    May 27, 2019
    4
    Wow this game is a mess on PC. Finally they added MOD support but oh my it was horrible on launch.
  81. Lone_Wolf_Sones
    Aug 7, 2016
    2
    For a series that has prided itself on its 60 fps gunplay Black Ops III on PC is another shoddy port that suffers from lack of optimization. Stuttering is so frequent as to render the game unplayable. Highly recommend waiting to see if the issues are fixed. If you already have bought it you can get a refund through Steam.
  82. Greggg
    Sep 4, 2016
    3
    This is an excellent game, but the servers forced me to rate it so low. They are many times disconnected at zombies. I dont know for multi. It's so annoying
  83. hawkeye766
    Sep 16, 2016
    6
    Having been a bit out of the gaming loop as of late, and having some friends that played this game, I decided to check it out. I was enticed at first, but I quickly became bored. I first played the zombies mode, which brought about an interesting premise but as a casual player i really couldn't get much farther than about the sixth level, which made it frustrating. Especially becauseHaving been a bit out of the gaming loop as of late, and having some friends that played this game, I decided to check it out. I was enticed at first, but I quickly became bored. I first played the zombies mode, which brought about an interesting premise but as a casual player i really couldn't get much farther than about the sixth level, which made it frustrating. Especially because zombies has become less of an amusing arcade mode and actually features a narrative, which I'd really like to experience, but cannot because I lack hours to devote to a game that starts over when you die.
    This brings me to the campaign, which I have always thought to be CoD's most redeeming aspect. This was a really lazily developed story that had some fun parts, and dealt with some interesting Ideas that, if properly synthesized, could have made a decent experience. It just didn't though. In my opinion CoD is just too far in the future now to create a well grounded story. They try to provide the thrill of Geopolitical turmoil, but since you know next to nothing about the pieces at play, the political side of the game is just really flat. BO3 is also fettered by a cruddy customization system that leaves you finishing the campaign far below your potential. Not that it matters much because the objectives pretty much consist of running over here, running over there, (on a wall this time), and flying this way. Pouring as much ammunition as possible into whatever bullet sponge of an enemy thats shooting at you right now. Basically all your enemies are robots now, so you have to shoot everything twice as much.
    As for the most popular part of the CoD experience, multiplayer can be fun, but its mostly just a matter of fast movement. As a casual gamer, i started out just getting demolished by a bunch of experienced players with extremely fast awareness and reflexes. It is more or less a matter of who sees who first, because all elements of fps tacticality have been all but eliminated. This sounds like a joke, but its actually impossible to check corners or use angles to your advantage in any way because of the map design. It can sometimes be enjoyable, but after playing the battlefield beta, this multiplayer, and really this whole game are a largely pleasureless experience for me.    … Expand
  84. KittyWhisky
    Mar 24, 2017
    6
    Continued amazing series of Black Ops I was absolutely not expecting this. I think many did not expect this to continue. Doubt crept in since the announcement - the game has a cooperative. But co-op kills the narrative. The plot in Black Ops 1 and 3 was intriguing and crazy, the characters were wonderful.

    In the story it turned out better than I expected. The plot is very ambitious, but    Continued amazing series of Black Ops I was absolutely not expecting this. I think many did not expect this to continue. Doubt crept in since the announcement - the game has a cooperative. But co-op kills the narrative. The plot in Black Ops 1 and 3 was intriguing and crazy, the characters were wonderful.

    In the story it turned out better than I expected. The plot is very ambitious, but unfortunately it's not an RPG, and the writers failed in a shooter to submit a clever plot. What happened in the end we can only guess, as the writers gave us enough clues to get a complete picture.

    Gameplay with the last part changed, mainly because of the abilities is a good find and nicely dilutes the gameplay. It is a pity that combining styles is possible too late level. A lot to pass this game not everyone wants such a sad story (sad for Call of Duty series and Black Ops). I especially missed you at the stages when you need to gradually destroy the robots is boring.

    The multiplayer in the beta I really liked. On release, he was absolutely unplayable because of the lag and terrible ping. Repaired it for a very long time, and now to play it is not even desirable. Zambi the regime has become more entertaining, since we are in the unusual setting, and this mode is fun as usual. Although, why should it play, if there are more good games for shooting zombies.

    Black Ops 3 is not a sequel, which I shook. For Treyarch it is a huge step back. Graphics are surprisingly bad, much worse than in Advanced Warfare. Why you can recommend? In the story there are interesting locations, a bit of surrealism, very good gameplay - a fun run around, kill everyone, and move on to use abilities.    … Expand
  85. Xxdaniels751xX
    May 10, 2017
    1
    I bought it almost out for about 50 euros and was not disappointed, the good thing is that it complies with what it offers; Quick games, very simple and little more, a CoD like the ones of each year, I do not recommend the purchase to date because there are almost no people playing. If you liked the zombies of Black Ops or you happen to buy this game.
  86. MLGBoost
    Jun 1, 2017
    9
    This is a recent review for the game as of 2017. I purchased this game because of mostly zombies and dlc 5. The zombies is amazing and the multiplayer is great, don't let people tell you its bed when it really is being over criticized. Correctly, this game has performance issues, not major though. The experience must be tried if you never have played a current COD. Campaign is eh and theThis is a recent review for the game as of 2017. I purchased this game because of mostly zombies and dlc 5. The zombies is amazing and the multiplayer is great, don't let people tell you its bed when it really is being over criticized. Correctly, this game has performance issues, not major though. The experience must be tried if you never have played a current COD. Campaign is eh and the graphics are amazing for a COD game. Not worth 50$ but still should be fine if you catch a sale. Movement is amazing and freely flowing. The only problem with this game is the campaign. The story seems repetitive and boring.… Expand
  87. WarBear0003
    Feb 28, 2018
    9
    The game includes a lot of content. Campaign was a typical COD campaign and was quite good. What I liked was that you could play the campaign with 3 other people. Multiplayer is fast paced and very fun. I don't see a lot of hackers so that's good. But some of the weapons are too overpowered. Especially the ones you get from crates. I'm ok with the futuristic setting but I know some peopleThe game includes a lot of content. Campaign was a typical COD campaign and was quite good. What I liked was that you could play the campaign with 3 other people. Multiplayer is fast paced and very fun. I don't see a lot of hackers so that's good. But some of the weapons are too overpowered. Especially the ones you get from crates. I'm ok with the futuristic setting but I know some people don't like it. Zombie mode is great fun and puzzling. Overall it's a great game with a lot of fun content. It's totally worth the price.… Expand
  88. DrDRA
    Jun 3, 2018
    10
    Внезапно обнаружил что мой обзор на Call of Duty: Black Ops 3 написан абсолютно глупо, коротко и отчасти бездарно.
    К Black Ops 3 можно относится очень вариативно, так как мнений по этой игре скопилось очень много. Мое личное мнение будет немного субъективно.
    Сингл был пройден мной на старте. Могу сказать сразу, не ждите очевидной связи между Black Ops 2 и 3, но она все же есть. Вначале    Внезапно обнаружил что мой обзор на Call of Duty: Black Ops 3 написан абсолютно глупо, коротко и отчасти бездарно.
    К Black Ops 3 можно относится очень вариативно, так как мнений по этой игре скопилось очень много. Мое личное мнение будет немного субъективно.
    Сингл был пройден мной на старте. Могу сказать сразу, не ждите очевидной связи между Black Ops 2 и 3, но она все же есть. Вначале ваc сразу кидает в гущу событий пост-фактум, нет прописанного лора или в принципе хоть какого-то намека на начало конфликта, только маленькая часть предыстории касательно противо-воздушных орудий. Однако вот такой медленный старт сюжета превращается быстро, даже внезапно в один из лучших сюжетов в истории Call of Duty. Это один из лучших кибер-панков, который я наблюдал, сопоставимый с Экспериментами Ллейн по степени проработки. Да, сюжет мне омрачила исключительно русская озвучка, но после просмотра прохождения на английском, я понял, это реально один из лучших сюжетов в колде. + боссы, вы не ослышались, в этой игре есть подобие боссов и полноценный кооп, как в World at War, мое почтение Treyarch, вы смогли.
    Графически эта игра лучше чем недавно вышедшая WWII. Отдельно я хочу отметить катсцены и локацию, которая просто сносит башню - Frozen Forest. Не буду спойлерить, эта локация шедевр, ее нужно пережить и прочувствовать.
    Мультиплеер - параша как и в любой колде и я даже не собираюсь его оценивать, единственное что хочу отметить, можно забавно троллить игроков подпрыгивая и самоубиваясь с помощью ракетницы, попутно убивая врага. Выглядит это действительно забавно, особенно когда это киллкам последнего убийства в раунде.
    Давайте подводить итоги. Трейарч забожили в своей серии WaW-BO-BO2-BO3 и BO3 это квинтэссенция Call of Duty, да я субъективен, я люблю качественный и мощный киберпанк. 1010    … Expand
  89. LightPoth
    Jan 23, 2018
    8
    I only scored this an 8 only because of the Zombies Mode. Black Ops 3 Zombies is a blast with all DLC's and with Chronicles to experience its a treat to all Zombies veterans and beginners.
  90. gold
    Sep 23, 2018
    6
    Сюжет - 7, графика - 5, геймплей - 6. Концовка - хороша, локации - круты, музыка - 9. И всё.
    ИТОГ: 6.890/10
  91. KingJailson
    May 30, 2018
    8
    Esse cod não é grande coisa mas é bom, a campanha é um unico ponto fraco do jogo, nada ver comparado com outros black ops, o multiplayer é legal, o zombies é bom, mas seria uma coisa que ia estragar a versão pc, que é sua mal otimização, que cagou o jogo
  92. greenbey
    Jun 29, 2020
    7
    A-
    Story is complicated and overall a bad writing.
    Gameplay is fun and diverse with different levels like burning zombie nazis and boss fights.
    Not a bad game.
    Multiplayer introduces class system for the series.
  93. nobodyshot
    Oct 27, 2018
    10
    best game of the game

    !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  94. Setox
    Aug 8, 2019
    7
    I'm wondering at the amount of massive negative scores. This game is not too bad or ugly, just yet another generic FPS shooter.
    The storyline so much worse than in BO or BO2, but in endgame becomes more interesting
    Visual is ok, even for 2k19
  95. SilverOrlov
    Sep 29, 2019
    7
    Black Ops 1-3 are about on the same level of interest and game-play for me. More or less tolerable plot, albeit with frequent silly moments. More or less good shooter, but with bag skill system. This game looked very "sugary and trimmed down", unlike the rest of the series.
  96. kaanelif
    Feb 14, 2021
    1
    Worst call of duty game in my life. Starting with save problems, after solving them:
    Can not get weapons from enemies, the game dont let you move everywhere before the npc goes first Cannot open doors as soon as possible. Its real garbage.
  97. megumin_OwO
    Mar 31, 2019
    4
    hahahhahahhahhahahahahhahahahahhaahahhahahahahhahhahahhahahahahhahahaah funny
  98. C4rn4ge
    Aug 22, 2019
    8
    Best COD with advanced movement. Only negativ point for me are the MTX and the campaign was mediocre. Didn´t play zombies.
  99. kimchiwarrior
    Jul 11, 2019
    2
    Black Ops 1 and 2 are Korean-language support, but suddenly 3 not support? It's a series game, the production company is too bad. :(
  100. TaYLaNSMiT
    Mar 23, 2021
    10
    After reading this games negative reviews I'm pretty sure no one who rated it anything lower than a 7 bothered finishing school
Page:

Awards & Rankings

21
#21 Most Discussed PC Game of 2015
35
#35 Most Shared PC Game of 2015

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
73

Mixed or average reviews - based on 10 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 7 out of 10
  2. Mixed: 2 out of 10
  3. Negative: 1 out of 10
  1. LEVEL (Czech Republic)
    Dec 3, 2015
    60
    A bit better than the Ghosts, but worse than Advanced Warfare – new Call of Duty is awkwardly trying to make some changes in single player, but adding a bunch of technical problems in the same time. Multiplayer it is flawless as usual. [Issue#258]
  2. Riot Pixels
    Nov 30, 2015
    60
    Treyarch should have created one awesome sci-fi campaign instead of three mediocre ones.
    Read full review
  3. Ragequit.gr
    Nov 14, 2015
    81
    Treyarch gives us a Call of Duty game that is brimming with content and is sure to provide hundreds of hours of entertainment to its buyers. It’s just a shame that the focus on the quantity of content ended up causing a lack of polish in some areas.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »