User Score
7.0

Mixed or average reviews- based on 71 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 36 out of 71
  2. Negative: 11 out of 71
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
  1. NicolasS
    Jan 21, 2010
    10
    This game is not as good as the 1st but there just something to behold in this one.
  2. jimmib
    Dec 26, 2009
    3
    gameplay broken level design poor unrealistic destruction of environment and enemies a.i. poor civilian reaction breaks whats left of immersion graphics poor guns poor poor game in general
  3. Jun 11, 2016
    10
    I personally think that this video game is far better than Monolith's video game called No one Lives Forever. It's so fun. And there are many weapons which you can use and the soundtrack is great! Too bad a sequel didn't released since then.
  4. Apr 9, 2019
    10
    great game. One one the best FPS on PC. Of course its a very old one so grafx aren't not the best, but music and fun is eternal, so this is definitly a legend
  5. Jan 15, 2020
    10
    AWESOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOME (nightdive studios, reissue the game!)
  6. Jun 26, 2018
    7
    Blood 2 the chosen is a game with huge potential and a great concept just like it's previous game, but it fail to be as good as the first game with a repetitive gameplay, but what game is not repetitive?
    the game uses the lithtech game engine and it was the second game from monolith to use it's brand new engine, but even for a game releases in 1998 it look's bad, it have an interesting
    Blood 2 the chosen is a game with huge potential and a great concept just like it's previous game, but it fail to be as good as the first game with a repetitive gameplay, but what game is not repetitive?
    the game uses the lithtech game engine and it was the second game from monolith to use it's brand new engine, but even for a game releases in 1998 it look's bad, it have an interesting level design in some areas but others were no that great.
    the game premise is so simple and the gameplay as well which only consist on shot everything you can, most of the time you'll find yourself in this repetitive level or segment that involve a sub terrain train, this happens like 8 or 9 times in total during the course of the game.
    it has a bit of the humor that the game is known for, and just like the first game, make reference to horror films like "The Shining" "Alien" "Predator" like easter eggs hiding in the levels.
    It could have potential, but a short production deadline like this game had, really affect the overall product. It had poor sales and it was a bad game that almost cause Monolith to shut down.
    Again, it's not a great or perfect game, but definitely a "check it out" game.
    Expand
  7. Aug 1, 2023
    6
    After the masterpiece the first one was the second is dull.

    Pros.: - Blood franchise. - A lot of blood. A LOT. - Dismemberment and violence. - Many weapons. Though, many won't be used. - More feasible story than the first one had. - Easter Eggs. References to previous projects and AvP. Cons.: - Many weapons won't EVER be used. - Design is very poor - not many items, things in
    After the masterpiece the first one was the second is dull.

    Pros.:
    - Blood franchise.
    - A lot of blood. A LOT.
    - Dismemberment and violence.
    - Many weapons. Though, many won't be used.
    - More feasible story than the first one had.
    - Easter Eggs. References to previous projects and AvP.

    Cons.:
    - Many weapons won't EVER be used.
    - Design is very poor - not many items, things in the locations. It is the same stuff that happened in AvP.
    - The story is also poor.
    - Enemies are dumb.
    - Some of the main antagonists have some back story or a bit of a character but it is VERY low. Not like other Monolith projects.
    Expand
  8. Jun 25, 2020
    4
    Same case as Devil May Cry 2. A okay game but a terrible sequel to a great game. While this one has it´s fun, it suffers from age in graphics and a HORRIBLE difficulty curve, while the original Blood was challenging it was fair and this one just goes to outright **** in many occasions which becomes extremely irritating really quickly, i think the only good parts are the first couple ofSame case as Devil May Cry 2. A okay game but a terrible sequel to a great game. While this one has it´s fun, it suffers from age in graphics and a HORRIBLE difficulty curve, while the original Blood was challenging it was fair and this one just goes to outright **** in many occasions which becomes extremely irritating really quickly, i think the only good parts are the first couple of levels and weapons and music but...that´s about it, if you´re not a hardcore fan of the original Blood then just stay away from this game. Expand
  9. Jul 10, 2021
    0
    If Civvie and Gordon Ramsay can put this into two words, it would be this.

    "F@#$ING RAW!"
  10. Mar 8, 2021
    5
    This game is average. The story in uninteresting, the main character is less interesting, it moved from 2.5D to 3D and the graphics are good for the time. The gameplay is very good but the difficulty spikes are noticeable. While it is a game released in 1998, it performs poorly in 2021. I am getting low FPS at random otherwise it works ok for the most part. Games like thief 1 and Half lifeThis game is average. The story in uninteresting, the main character is less interesting, it moved from 2.5D to 3D and the graphics are good for the time. The gameplay is very good but the difficulty spikes are noticeable. While it is a game released in 1998, it performs poorly in 2021. I am getting low FPS at random otherwise it works ok for the most part. Games like thief 1 and Half life also released in 1998 perform much better. Overall i wouldnt really recommend playing this game Expand
Metascore
72

Mixed or average reviews - based on 14 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 8 out of 14
  2. Negative: 1 out of 14
  1. There are a lot of fresh components laboring to make this a different game, including the engine, but the end result is not at all frightening. Too much emphasis was placed on puerile humor, which I am all for in most games, but I needed something different here.
  2. Another "could have, should have" game. While it follows the old school formula a little too much, it can still be enjoyable if you like to annihilate things with big guns.
  3. The writing is of the quality that you'll find in your average Jean-Claude Van Damme flick. It tries to be witty and satirical, but is adolescent and uninteresting instead.