Battlefleet Gothic: Armada

 PC
Metascore
77

Generally favorable reviews - based on 36 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 23 out of 36
  2. Mixed: 13 out of 36
  3. Negative: 0 out of 36
Buy Now
Buy on
  1. PC Games
    Apr 28, 2016
    74
    Tindalos Interactive did a good job of injecting atmosphere and setting from the fine tabletop-game into a great visual and entertaining RTS on PC. There are tons of options to develop your Battlefleet in the Warhammer 40k-Gothic-Universe. The campaign’s plot is a nice adaption of the 12th Black Crusade and the battles are based on tactical decisions. Unfortunately there is lack of mission-variety and often the time-limits during the missions can be frustrating. Units/Factions are not well balanced so far, so you often have no idea, why you win or lose a battle. Skirmish and Multiplayer is quite entertaining for a while, but it offers not that many options and only the same scenarios as in the campaign mode.
  2. Game World Navigator Magazine
    May 18, 2016
    73
    Compared to other projects based on Games Workshop tabletop games, BGA is closest to the ancient dilogy of Shadow of the Horned Rat and Dark Omen. Just like these, BGA sacrifices turn-based gameplay in favor of real-time, but sticks to the spirit and letter of the source as closely as possible. [Issue#209, p.78]
    All this publication's reviews
  3. Riot Pixels
    Sep 11, 2016
    72
    Battlefleet Gothic: Armada is really eager to eat your time, and, since this game is chock-full of micromanagement, it can be too overwhelming at times. It can also be a lot of fun when you play online with actual people, so pick it up if you're looking for fresh multiplayer experiences.
  5. Wccftech
    Apr 22, 2016
    72
    Battlefleet Gothic is a mixed bag. The slow pace hinders a game that should be all about letting you jump in to epic space battles but as you develop, leveling up ships and customising your fleet to what you want, it does prove itself to be a strong contender.
  6. IGN
    Apr 21, 2016
    71
    There are a lot of good ideas in Battlefleet Gothic: Armada, and it certainly looks like a great tactical space combat game. But it struggles to build that into a coherent whole, making it tough to recommend unless you’re willing to utterly dedicate yourself to fully comprehending the inaccessible systems of its combat.
  7. games(TM)
    Jun 26, 2016
    70
    A great use of the Warhammer license. [Issue#175, p.83]
    All this publication's reviews
  8. Games.cz
    May 19, 2016
    70
    Decent space RTS offers a funny single-player campaign, but needs a number of adjustments in multiplayer – especially with balancing.
  9. PC PowerPlay
    May 9, 2016
    70
    At times too slavish a recreation of tabletop action, Armada is nonetheless entertaining and challenging. [Issue#250, p.68]
    All this publication's reviews
  10. God is a Geek
    Apr 28, 2016
    70
    Despite some minor frustrations Battlefleet: Gothic Armada is a fun RTS that isn’t too unwelcoming to people new to the genre.
  11. Eurogamer Italy
    Apr 25, 2016
    70
    This RTS game is very challenging to master and will need a lot of time for you to be crafty with the different skills, manoeuvres and tactics. Not a game for everyone though. A must try for all Warhammer 40k fans.
  12. 4P.de
    May 13, 2016
    69
    The space battles and Warhammer flair are top notch, but the strategic core is too generic.
  13. Gamer.no
    May 2, 2016
    60
    Battleship Gothic: Armada delivers a beautiful depiction of space warfare in the Warhammer 40,000 universe, but a lackluster campaign, a weird AI, and too much focus on micromanagement in an already chaotic environment ruins this potentially exciting title.
  14. Hooked Gamers
    Apr 29, 2016
    60
    Battlefleet: Gothic Armada is a competent if slightly laborious first foray into the realms of Warhammer 40,000’s space battles, but there is potential here. As Dawn of War II changed almost all the elements of its precursor for the better, it will be interesting to see what Tindalos would do next were it to return to this franchise.
This publication does not provide a score for their reviews.
This publication has not posted a final review score yet.
These unscored reviews do not factor into the Metascore calculation.

In Progress & Unscored

?
  1. Rock, Paper, Shotgun
    Apr 22, 2016
    More than anything, it’s left me with a wide grin and itchy fingers, and as soon as I’m done here I’ll be jumping right back into the game.

User Reviews

All reviews »
User Score
7.6

Generally favorable reviews- based on 128 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 85 out of 128
  2. Mixed: 25 out of 128
  3. Negative: 18 out of 128
  1. RaygunCourtesan
    Apr 25, 2016
    0
    Battlefleet Gothic: Armada - The game of epic naval strategy (in space) that is none of those things.

    Is it epic? No. The game limits    Battlefleet Gothic: Armada - The game of epic naval strategy (in space) that is none of those things.

    Is it epic? No.

    The game limits you to a handful of ships (usually 3-4) which is both tremendously underwhelming if you were looking forward to commanding you know...an armada, and necessitates (or is perhaps a consequence of? Which came first, the dead duck pretending to be a chicken, or the rotten egg?) the other aspects of the game.

    Is it naval? No.

    BFG was always a naval combat game given a space skin. That's why it was always 2D and the rules never dealt with issues like persistence of momentum in a vacuum. That's a good thing, suspend disbelief and it helps keep the game simple and accessible.

    Unfortunately the units in BFG do not behave anything like ships. Sail powered, motorised or space. They're more like rally cars with very poor tire grip.

    Ships do not move in a deliberate fashion, instead every vessel from the smallest gunboat to the largest battleship wheels, skids and turns on a dime in fractions of a second. It sort of defeats the point of having things like weapon facings or positioning at all.

    Is it strategic? No.

    The consequence of having very few units to control and allowing them virtually complete freedom to re-orient at a moment's notice means that there is no room for strategy or planning. The best laid plans can be undone at a moment's notice and setting up ambushes or positioning for running broadsides is actually rendered a detriment.

    The emergency manuever mechanic will take up the bulk of your gametime. The depleting and constantly replenishing power bar is generous enough to repeated instant 180 degree turns on even the biggest ships and once finally exhausted, it replenishes in mere seconds.

    The remainder of your time will be spent managing cooldowns. And oh my, does this game have cooldowns. It heard you liked cooldowns, so it assigned cooldowns for your cooldowns, so you could manage cooldowns while you wait for your cooldowns.

    Did I mention cooldowns? They're a thing.

    There's a cooldown to make your shooting better (on every ship). A cooldown to take damage better (on every ship). There's even a cooldown to reduce your cooldowns! (and yes, its on every ship!). Why these are necessary at all is beyond me. Since its essential to use them constantly they'd be much better off being rolled into the base stats ("But then what buttons will people press?!?!".

    This is before you even get into the plethora of active abilities that actually deserve their own special buttons. Firing a torpedo spread is a tactical decision and ought to be left up to the player (ironically this is the one instance where the auto-cast actually does an okay job of managing it for you). Unfortunately, most of these tactical weapons are completed wasted due to the scale of the game. There are no battle lines to break up, no target rich areas to saturate. Just three enemy ships pirouetting about like mechanical ballet dancers who you'll never hit at anything but point blank range.

    And then we enter the much anticipated veterancy system. Rather than using this to allow ships to do what they did before, but be better at it, the game has opted to add...MORE COOLDOWNS! There're a small number of passive veteran abilities but only two or three will be useful on any one ship. And then you're forced to purchase yet more special buttons. Special buttons to regenerate your shields (could've been passive, or conditional and auto-cast) special buttons to make yourself invincible. Special buttons to throw out yet MORE inaccurate AOE effects that would've been excellent choices in a game of epic naval combat, but are completely wasted in this badly conceived skirmish game.

    In many respects its repeating the errors that plagued Rome 2 - nobody wants micro in a strategy game. They want to control a huge army/fleet and direct the flow of battle, not babysit count downs. While Total War had enough of a pedigree to realise their mistake (while of course denying they made one) and quietly removed virtually all of the button mashing from the game,

    Tl;dr - Its a skirmish game stuck in micro-hell. There's no room for strategy, you'll be too busy performing handbreak turns and spamming CD's to actually notice much less direct the battle. You react to this game, you don't take an active hand in it.

    If you're looking for a new MOBA this could be entertaining if you can find big enough team games to actually cobble together a half-respectable fleet on both sides. There is doubtless a lot to appeal to the MOBA fan here - cooldown management is essential, combat is a second-by-second affair about managing a power bar.

    If however you were hoping for the epic game of naval strategy they promised...this is not it. What's so frustrating is that it easily could have been. Why they decided to go this route with it is something i'll never understand but I don't plan to waste any more time trying to find out.    … Full Review »
  2. Veska
    Apr 21, 2016
    8
    Really amazing tactic RTS game. It isnt normal RTS just like AoE II etc. No, it is "board" game, that you can play on pc. And it would beReally amazing tactic RTS game. It isnt normal RTS just like AoE II etc. No, it is "board" game, that you can play on pc. And it would be maybe the best Warhammer 40k game, that i played. Really. I love series DoW etc, but this? This is game, that we want. Really nice graphic, every detail on ships. Four amazing races just like Orcs, Elders, Chaos and Empire. And every races have different played style. If you played board game Battlefleet Armada, you must like this game.

    Lookin' down, da' barrel of a gun,
    Gruntin' at each 'uvver
    Frough big sharp teeth,
    sayin' "dis one'll give us some fuuuun"

    Filthy Orks on a humies ship, killin' anything that isn't greeen
    Gruntin' at each 'uvver!
    Frough big sharp teeth,
    sayin' "Times are getting leean!"

    One lone Ork left ta steal da loot, wishin' it hadn't turned out sooo
    Frough big sharp teeth
    Sayin' "I shoulda let the pi-lot goooooo!

    Gruntin at each uvver,
    Frough big sharp teeth
    Sayin' "I was da' un' who saw it first!"

    WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGGGGHHHH!    … Full Review »
  3. ZaPaAl
    Jul 14, 2016
    6
    The scenery, the ships, atmosphere and voices are great. Gameplay is fun at first.
    Sadly, the story is thin and often not really presented,    The scenery, the ships, atmosphere and voices are great. Gameplay is fun at first.
    Sadly, the story is thin and often not really presented, just some text and voice.
    Campaign has around 31-33 stages with about 2-4 turns (battles) each. You can more or less choose which battle to play, but almost every battle is one out of a total pool of about 5-6 mission types. Only the ships and numbers change. The battles are fun, but the fun very soon starts dwindling away with that much repetition. Not much to do otherwise, except choosing and upgrading ships with minor differences and adjustments.
    Although I only played single player, I don't think multiplayer is very much different.    … Full Review »
See all user reviews »