Battlefield V

 PC
User Score
3.0

Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 3148 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 674 out of 3148
  2. Mixed: 296 out of 3148
  3. Negative: 2,178 out of 3148
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. ShadyMa
    Dec 6, 2018
    5
    This game could be better if they fixed teambalance, physics and teamwork. its basically impossible to teamwork, when u cant barely communicate. I cant tell my teammates where the other are, without writing it in chat. its annoying. And I cant understand why a panzerfaust, cant kill a man, but it can kill a tank. Hitting a person in the head 4 time with a stg doesn't kill him, but onlyThis game could be better if they fixed teambalance, physics and teamwork. its basically impossible to teamwork, when u cant barely communicate. I cant tell my teammates where the other are, without writing it in chat. its annoying. And I cant understand why a panzerfaust, cant kill a man, but it can kill a tank. Hitting a person in the head 4 time with a stg doesn't kill him, but only damages him for 74 hit points. Right now its unplayable and you should probably not buy it. Instead enjoy some of the older battlefields, because they are a lot better.… Expand
  2. poplo220
    Jan 6, 2019
    5
    La campaña es aburrida, parece más un sniper elite low cost a un batllefield.
    Tiene muchos fallos gráficos, jugándolo a 1080p y en ultra las rocas parecen de lego y el mar está hecho de manera horrible, el gta IV es más realista que el batllefield respecto al agua.
    Lo mejor es el multijugador, que pese a todos los bugs que tiene (y a que es un copia y pega del 1) se hace entretenido, lo    La campaña es aburrida, parece más un sniper elite low cost a un batllefield.
    Tiene muchos fallos gráficos, jugándolo a 1080p y en ultra las rocas parecen de lego y el mar está hecho de manera horrible, el gta IV es más realista que el batllefield respecto al agua.
    Lo mejor es el multijugador, que pese a todos los bugs que tiene (y a que es un copia y pega del 1) se hace entretenido, lo malo son los desafíos que te piden completar las campañas al 100%, porque como dije antes la campaña es un bodrio intenso.

    Se me hace raro ver a tantas mujeres nazis en el ejército también, aunque eso no lo valoro de manera tan negativa como lo anterior.

    La jugabilidad es buena, pero es una copia del 1, los gráficos pese a las carencias anteriormente mencionadas son buenos y superan a los del último COD por goleada, pero para nada necesitas eso 6gb de Vram que te piden, porque se ven muchos fallos tontos.

    Las muertes las veo cutres, no hay desmembramiento, no hay gore, no hay nada, te puede explotar una granada en la mano que to vas a seguir igual pero muerto, además las escenas son surrealistas y parecen animaciones de muñecos a lo cod mw2.

    Algo surrealista que tiene el multijugador es que, por ejemplo un tanque te revienta con el cañón pero pese a eso sigues con la posibilidad de ser reanimado por el médico, le han quitado mucho realismo al juego.

    No se siente como un juego de la segunda guerra mundial para nada, le doy un aprobado por los avances técnicos, y porque sigue siendo mejor que COD, pero solo lo recomendaría por su multijugador y para nada me gastaría 60$ en este producto, lo recomiendo en rebajas.

    De todas formas la experiencia multijugador tiene la esperanza de ser mejorada puesto que en febrero viene el modo Battle Royale y demás adiciones, algo que dará más vidilla y entretenimiento al juego.

    La banda sonora es buena, pero es no es nada nuevo en un videojuego de EA (ya que es de las pocas cosas que hacen bien)

    Gráficos 6/10
    Modo Campaña 2/10
    Multijugador 7//10
    Banda Sonora 8/10
    Ambientación 4/10
    Rigor Histórico 3/10    … Expand
  3. Addaz1990
    Dec 1, 2018
    5
    I really enjoy the game as a fps but its not a ww2 game. worst of all is the so called unknown war stories . the story called nordlys is a big lie the story is so far from the truth, just check out Operation Gunnerside. i hope that they how actually took part in this operation dont hear about this . just imagine the risk they took then someone else gets credit for it.
  4. ValHazard
    Dec 7, 2018
    5
    The single player campaign was garbage, the AI completely retarded and the gameplay was anything but challenging or interesting, not to mention they basically re-wrote history in several war-stories which is shameful. Enough of that.
    The multiplayer, the bread and butter of Battlefield : Mediocre, uninspired and boring maps create boring gameplay. With the exception of 1 or 2 maps, the    The single player campaign was garbage, the AI completely retarded and the gameplay was anything but challenging or interesting, not to mention they basically re-wrote history in several war-stories which is shameful. Enough of that.
    The multiplayer, the bread and butter of Battlefield : Mediocre, uninspired and boring maps create boring gameplay. With the exception of 1 or 2 maps, the rest are poorly thought out and instead of feeling like warzones they feel empty and bland with players running around aimlessly instead of having the battle lines form when taking a point. You know those Battlefield moments the games are known for ? Well, for some reason they are quite rare in this game. BF3, BF4 and even BF1 had crazy, funny, unexpected moments every minute but that doesn't seem to happen in this game a lot. The only funny moments are usually due to weird bugs and physics fails. Bugs and lack of content aside, the gameplay here is mediocre, most guns feel like airsoft guns, there's no punch to them, the graphics are good but too cartoonish and the colours look washed out making everything look really bright in some places and way too dark in others. Even the test range is a disappointment and it's only good for flying planes, not much else.

    The game might get better after future patches like most BF games did in the past but there's something mediocre about the gameplay that will be hard to fix.

    At the moment the game is an unfinished mess not worthy of anyone's money.    … Expand
  5. ohwooops
    Dec 27, 2018
    5
    Can be fun and gunplay feels good, but incredibly unfinished. Lots of bugs, infinite loading screens, frustrating ttd (netcode), buggy tides of war challenges, etc. There really isn't enough content either, 9 maps which get old quickly (and some of them not even that well designed), only 2 factions and a good amount of recycled obscure BF1 weapons. Should wait until there's more contentCan be fun and gunplay feels good, but incredibly unfinished. Lots of bugs, infinite loading screens, frustrating ttd (netcode), buggy tides of war challenges, etc. There really isn't enough content either, 9 maps which get old quickly (and some of them not even that well designed), only 2 factions and a good amount of recycled obscure BF1 weapons. Should wait until there's more content and when the bugs are fixed.… Expand
  6. idahopotaters
    Jan 18, 2019
    5
    The campaigns were awesome! By far the best campaigns of all the Battlefields (I have played them all throughout the years). The multiplayer is terrible. There are an inadequate number of servers that are difficult to browse. There is no reporting system for cheaters. There is no auto balancing. Basically everything that made BF3 great, is gone. I may come back to the game if theyThe campaigns were awesome! By far the best campaigns of all the Battlefields (I have played them all throughout the years). The multiplayer is terrible. There are an inadequate number of servers that are difficult to browse. There is no reporting system for cheaters. There is no auto balancing. Basically everything that made BF3 great, is gone. I may come back to the game if they create a resident reporting system that they enforce. Until then, I cannot recommend this game to anyone for the multiplayer aspect of the game.… Expand
  7. tentadan
    Jan 19, 2019
    5
    why there is no battle of stalingrad,i would play it more, but i got it with the think of stalingrad
  8. Cz3rw0ny
    Dec 15, 2020
    5
    Unbalanced, repetitive and frankly speaking just plain boring Battlefield. Comparing to ones like Battlefield 2, Bad Company 2 or Battlefield 3 it is just worse.
  9. WhatWentWrong
    Apr 12, 2019
    5
    As a battlefield game it plays and feels like it should. Recently, however with the addition and focus on the battle royal mode "Firestorm" as well as developing a method of including micro-transactions; the games method of adding weapons, gear, and vehicles through weekly challenges could be in danger of making players pay for those items instead of being able to unlock them for free. TheAs a battlefield game it plays and feels like it should. Recently, however with the addition and focus on the battle royal mode "Firestorm" as well as developing a method of including micro-transactions; the games method of adding weapons, gear, and vehicles through weekly challenges could be in danger of making players pay for those items instead of being able to unlock them for free. The game has a decent selection of firearms and vehicles in game but has obviously left out many of them in favor of releasing them later with large expansion packs. Multiplayer can often find itself plagued by cheaters and hackers that do not even attempt to hide their acts, fearing no repercussions as so far there hasn't really been any. This isn't to say the multiplayer isn't fun as the classic large scale matches with many vehicles driving or flying about make for both hectic and fun moments the series is known for. Vehicles have also been reworked to add an ammo system that they can now run out and have to restock, with this the tanks especially heavy tanks feel big and powerful and the unique designs of the era all have strengths and weaknesses. Firestorm does not add anything nor make itself very distinct from any other battle royal but is just simply battle royal in Battlefield. A possible downfall is that there seems to be such a focus on trying to jump into the bandwagon of the popularity of battle royal instead of focusing on the true aspects of what make Battlefield a truly great game and make it stand on its own rather than try to take it in a direction and focus on something that is overused and losing attraction.… Expand
  10. DoubleDamn
    Jun 28, 2019
    5
    On the edge of being fun and cinematic, but for every amazing moment, there is a broken one. feels fundamentally broken and rushed. wouldn't recommend
  11. FuriousAegon
    Feb 1, 2022
    5
    First of all I haven’t tried the campaign, because I know how **** it is, so I will only review multiplayer, and god it is fun.In 2021 summer it was pure fun to play with friends huge variety of guns,maps,vehicles, and classes of soldiers.
    Game keep a really good atmosphere of a real fight in maps.But Time took kill is unforgivable and snipers are dumb fu**s.
    5/10
  12. Septictank
    Oct 19, 2019
    5
    No auto-balance and it is not block base-rape and no private server no anti-cheat. BFV has a lot of problem. BF1 had some special animation and event for example Zeppelin or train. They were changing atmosphere of the game or flamethrower etc. But BfV has not special thing. Aaand where are the **** ribbons? But graphics are so good and gameplay very well. Next bf must be modern war.
  13. DCS431516526
    Nov 19, 2021
    5
    Trash campaign.

    Great gunplay.

    Ok maps.

    Trash vehicles.

    A decent game at 90% sale or part of the EA play experience. Otherwirse, would not recommend.
  14. Genek13
    Nov 14, 2019
    5
    Oh EA, what are you doing with all your games in last few years is mind blowing for me.
    Very big step down compared to BF1...
  15. Yasen59
    Mar 24, 2020
    5
    Cool game
  16. sacrifizzle
    Sep 15, 2020
    5
    the gameplay is good, definitely an improvement from BF1 especially the movement (makes BF1 kinda cluncky in comparison) and gunplay but the game is hampered by the hacker/cheater, whatever you wanna call them. 9 out of 10 server is filled with hackers because the devs can't do proper anti-cheat, the 1 out of 10 being a custom server that got admins in them.

    and don't forget the patch,    the gameplay is good, definitely an improvement from BF1 especially the movement (makes BF1 kinda cluncky in comparison) and gunplay but the game is hampered by the hacker/cheater, whatever you wanna call them. 9 out of 10 server is filled with hackers because the devs can't do proper anti-cheat, the 1 out of 10 being a custom server that got admins in them.

    and don't forget the patch, the devs screw up almost every patch in this game. the amount of map is lacking compared to BF1, they better don't do this "live service" thingy if every patch is a broken mess.

    thank god i got this game for free.    … Expand
  17. Plamen_K
    Sep 24, 2020
    5
    Did we really need a battle royale? well at least there is a campaign that is somewhat good.
  18. hughjphgames
    Dec 13, 2020
    5
    I got this game on origin access, I think it's called something different now, but I only got it for one month so I could play the battlefield games and a few others. What I noticed was BF4, BF1 were both good games, from the same franchise but different, however, BF5 was practically a carbon copy of BF1, the campaign was short, admittedly like BF1/4, but it felt more like a DLC to BF1I got this game on origin access, I think it's called something different now, but I only got it for one month so I could play the battlefield games and a few others. What I noticed was BF4, BF1 were both good games, from the same franchise but different, however, BF5 was practically a carbon copy of BF1, the campaign was short, admittedly like BF1/4, but it felt more like a DLC to BF1 then a game in its own right. While it was relatively fun to play through, the bugs, story, and historical accuracy - a major selling point for the battlefield series - left me disappointed and was a bad end to a good series of games… Expand
  19. Ali129
    Jul 7, 2021
    5
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Battlefield V bana göre Battlefield serisinin en kötü oyunu. Battlefield V, Battlefield 1'in 2. Dünya Savaşı temalı genişleme paketiymiş gibi hissettirdi bana. Çünkü grafikler ve oynanış mekanikleri Battlefield 1'in neredeyse aynısı. Oyunun hikayesini anlatmaya başlayayım, daha doğrusu hikayelerini. Çünkü oyun hikaye anlatımı olarak Battlefield 1'de de kullanılan "War Stories" sistemini kullanıyor ancak bu sistem pek de iyi değil. Bu sisteme göre tek bir hikaye yerine daha kısa ve birbirinden bağımsız birkaç farklı hikaye anlatılıyor. Oyun tek bir hikayeye değil de kısa ama fazla hikayeye yoğunlaştığı için hikayelerin ilerleyişi çok kopuk oluyor ve beklenilen etkiyi yaratamıyor. Bu oyunda Prologue, Nordlys, Trailleur, Under No Flag ve The Last Tiger olmak üzere 5 farklı savaş hikayesi var. Prologue adından da anlaşılacağı gibi Battlefield V'in giriş bölümü ve farklı yerlerden kesitlerle savaşın kötü bir şey olduğunu anlatıyor. Nordlys'te ise esir alınan annesini kurtarmaya çalışan bir kadının hikayesini oynuyoruz. Under No Flag hikayesinde bir suçlu olan Billy Bridger'ın İngiliz askeri olarak savaşa gönderilmesi ve savaşta yaşadıkları anlatılıyor. Tirailleur'da da Alman askerleri ile savaşan Fransız askerlerinin hikayesi anlatılıyor. Son olarak The Last Tiger'da ise bir Alman tankını kontrol eden mürettebatın hikayesi anlatılıyor. Hikayeler bu şekildeydi. Hikayelerin hepsi çok kopuk ve acele bir şekilde anlatılıyor, ayrıca hiçbir hikayenin derinliği yok. Bu hikayeler sanki sadece öylesine oyuna konulmuş gibi, çünkü hepsi özensiz hazırlanmış. Ana karakterler de dahil olmak üzere hikayelerin hiçbirinde ilgi çekici bir karakter yok, zaten karakterleri tanıyamıyoruz bile çünkü sadece birkaç kere ara sahne görme ve diyalog duyma şansımız oluyor. Sunum olarak da oyun pek iyi değil, yalnızca kısa kısa birkaç ara sahne ve önemsiz diyaloglar var hikayelerin içinde, ben bunları dikkate bile almadım açıkçası. Oynanışa gelirsek, oynanış ve mekanikler Battlefield 1 ile oldukça benzer. Vuruş hissi fena değil, silah sesleri ve kullanımları da fena değil. Silah çeşitliliği oyun 2. Dünya Savaşı'nda geçtiği için diğer Birinci Şahıs Nişancı oyunlarına göre daha az. Yapay zeka çok kötü, önceki oyunda da yapay zeka kötüydü ve bu oyunda yapay zekanın geliştirilmemiş olması üzücü. Düşmanlar genellikle çok saçma hareket ediyorlar ve sürekli hata yapıyorlar. Oyunun en büyük sorunu ise görev çeşitliliği, neredeyse bütün görevler birbirinin aynısı. Görevler hep önce çatışma daha sonra bir yerlere bomba yerleştirip orayı havaya uçurma şeklinde ilerliyor, doğal olarak bir yerden sonra bu aşırı sıkıcı bir hal almaya başlıyor. Tekrar tekrar aynı şeyi yapmak hiç keyifli değil. Grafiksel olarak bu oyun ile Battlefield 1 arasında gözle görülür bir fark olmasa da yine de grafikler çok iyi. Kullanılan gelişmiş ve stabil oyun motoru sayesinde performans sorunu da yaşamadım. Oyunu oynarken birçok küçük çapta hata ile karşılaştım. Battlefield V sürekli kendini tekrar eden yapısı ve kötü hikaye anlatımından dolayı iyi bir Birinci Şahıs Nişancı oyunu olmayı başaramamış.… Expand
  20. AxieEzz
    Jan 12, 2023
    5
    Если не рассматривать тот факт что с историей игра не имеет ничего близкого, а как онлайн шутан на пару вечеров - играбельно, но с большими "НО":
    - Читеры, их очень много, они не наказываются никак абсолютно
    - Отсутствие мотивации, победа или поражение ничего не дадут тебе - Достаточно много багов и даже крит. багов в стиле out of bounds Игра досталась за 0.5$ так что за такие бабки    Если не рассматривать тот факт что с историей игра не имеет ничего близкого, а как онлайн шутан на пару вечеров - играбельно, но с большими "НО":
    - Читеры, их очень много, они не наказываются никак абсолютно
    - Отсутствие мотивации, победа или поражение ничего не дадут тебе
    - Достаточно много багов и даже крит. багов в стиле out of bounds

    Игра досталась за 0.5$ так что за такие бабки побегать и поугарать с чернокожих небинарных афро-азиатских маскулинных женщин воюющих за вермахт - можно.

    5 Kertz! из 10    … Expand
  21. Catchy
    Nov 15, 2018
    4
    Single player is full of incorrect facts, example being the heavy water production in Norway, why couldn’t DICEEA just follow the proper historical events? That would be so much better.
    I was so looking forward to the heavy water mission, playing the role of Norwegian heroes, boy what a disappointment.
    Instead we play the role of ONE girl called Solveig, who take on a whole German army    Single player is full of incorrect facts, example being the heavy water production in Norway, why couldn’t DICEEA just follow the proper historical events? That would be so much better.
    I was so looking forward to the heavy water mission, playing the role of Norwegian heroes, boy what a disappointment.
    Instead we play the role of ONE girl called Solveig, who take on a whole German army by herself. Seems DICE and EA wants to change history because of "Political correctness", it’s sad and weak. It would be like they made a game with flat earth.
    In single player the gameplay feels like your common DoomWolfensteinDukenukem or any other first-person shooter gameplay from 1990s-2010s, where you solo a bunch of stuff yourself, simply boring.
    Also, what’s with the damn voices? Why on earth do we have to listen to a foreign language? It’s not like I’m going to read damn subtitles while I’m in a firefight!
    However, the major player base is going to play multiplayer, so that might be the reason why single player is such a mess.

    Multiplayer is ok, not much to say really, it’s same as before with a little more BF3 feel. However, the classes should be a bit more balanced, seems medic has a huge disadvantage over long range combat maps at the moment.
    Rumor has it that BF 5 has a matchmaking system and is supposed to balance players? If so, that is very good, it isn’t fun meeting a team of players who play videogames as a job, just imagine racing a F1 driver...And since the last patch multiplayer has been an enjoyment, with good balance, hope it lasts.
    I don’t understand the complaint that there are female characters however, you could just choose not to play as one, but yeah, their screams are a bit annoying.    … Expand
  22. MagicSquid
    Feb 2, 2019
    4
    The graphics and sound are nice. It's a shame the rest of the game didn't come included in the purchase.

    There are not enough maps. Not enough vehicles. Waaay too few guns per class. Medic gun balance issues (it's a Nerf gun, basically) Low player population during non-peak hours. Single player campaigns are tedious at best. Progression system is terrible. The customizing of    The graphics and sound are nice. It's a shame the rest of the game didn't come included in the purchase.

    There are not enough maps.
    Not enough vehicles.
    Waaay too few guns per class.
    Medic gun balance issues (it's a Nerf gun, basically)
    Low player population during non-peak hours.
    Single player campaigns are tedious at best.
    Progression system is terrible.

    The customizing of your weapons is poorly implemented. Cosmetic unlocks that don't impact the performance of the gun? Why have them in the game?!

    Strange netcode makes it feel like you're getting hit by a wall of enemy fire, while from their perspective, they're hitting you with a long, sustained rifle burst to take you down. It makes for an odd experience.

    Lots of bugs.

    For a AAA game, this game sure doesn't live up to it.    … Expand
  23. Surg3on
    Dec 4, 2018
    4
    This is not Battlefield. Perhaps we can call it Infantry Skirmish 1? The dull progression, terrible UI, tiny squads, punishing medic mechanics, almost no vehicles.... its just not battlefield anymore. There is no variety, no tank battles, no trying different kits unless you have limitless time to grind. Battlefield is meant to be BIG. What differentiates this game from generic popularThis is not Battlefield. Perhaps we can call it Infantry Skirmish 1? The dull progression, terrible UI, tiny squads, punishing medic mechanics, almost no vehicles.... its just not battlefield anymore. There is no variety, no tank battles, no trying different kits unless you have limitless time to grind. Battlefield is meant to be BIG. What differentiates this game from generic popular FPS shooter X? Its pretty. Is it prettier than BF1? not really. Was BF1 more fun? yes. Was BFanything but Hardline more fun? yes.

    Just for the record I don't really care about female/male model mix or stretching the historical story a bit as long as it feels fun to play. Its just not fun , I'm sorry Dice. I love you and wish you all the best.    … Expand
  24. JimmyDamage
    Feb 10, 2019
    4
    The game is devoid of content and starving for more big maps. Suppression effect is gone which negates the whole machine gunner/support class except for being a moving bullet dispenser.

    The only positives are 3D-spotting is kept to a minimum, graphics and sound are great and fortifications are awesome.
  25. Xon
    Mar 7, 2019
    4
    Pretty graphics.
    Inaccurate sounds.
    Factually inaccurate campaign to promote politcal agendas. Multiplayer is frustrating. Some interesting maps, many bugs and glitches and poorly implemented ideas. I've had 350+ hours per BF since BFBC2. After 50 hours I uninstalled the game, I felt that I was wasting what little free time I have on EA executives' bonuses. BFV was not made for    Pretty graphics.
    Inaccurate sounds.
    Factually inaccurate campaign to promote politcal agendas.

    Multiplayer is frustrating. Some interesting maps, many bugs and glitches and poorly implemented ideas.

    I've had 350+ hours per BF since BFBC2. After 50 hours I uninstalled the game, I felt that I was wasting what little free time I have on EA executives' bonuses. BFV was not made for gamers, just investors and executives to make money for nothing.    … Expand
  26. Simulacra_53
    Jan 19, 2019
    4
    Mediocre Battlefield game with a lot of rehash from BF1 and many poor design choices.

    No need to repeat the whole debacle - in short EA and Dice decided to lecture their customers instead of listening to them. This sum of corporate arrogance, painting by marketing numbers and social engineering ends up being a strange potpourri that is a very poor WW2 experience. To EA/Dice’s credit    Mediocre Battlefield game with a lot of rehash from BF1 and many poor design choices.

    No need to repeat the whole debacle - in short EA and Dice decided to lecture their customers instead of listening to them. This sum of corporate arrogance, painting by marketing numbers and social engineering ends up being a strange potpourri that is a very poor WW2 experience.

    To EA/Dice’s credit - technically the game runs fine, looks good enough and plays like a fast BF game - more CoD like but in a bad way.

    Long time BF fan, disappointed by the art and design direction Dice has chosen to follow.
    Hint: companies that fail to listen to their primary customer base tend to go bust.    … Expand
  27. Sephet
    Nov 8, 2021
    4
    DICE is not to be trusted. Battlefield games have an interesting concept unlike anything in the market, and the gameplay is pretty decent; however, they're expensive, will always be abandoned after 2-3 years and hack usage is rampart because the anti-cheat measures are a joke. A person will make their hacking obvious to all 64 players on a match, doing ridiculous stuff and reachingDICE is not to be trusted. Battlefield games have an interesting concept unlike anything in the market, and the gameplay is pretty decent; however, they're expensive, will always be abandoned after 2-3 years and hack usage is rampart because the anti-cheat measures are a joke. A person will make their hacking obvious to all 64 players on a match, doing ridiculous stuff and reaching ridiculous scores, and will still play for months before any action is taken. There's not even a report button in the game! The only other title where I saw more hackers than on this Battlefield was GTA V.

    It should be noted though that the negative scores (2.9 average as of November 2021) are representative of the state of the game upon release, where the initial maps were quite bad (as in different from previous WWII games) and some people were angry because there were women in game (go figure). The current state of the game is pretty much on the same level as Battlefield 1 which has a 7.1 average user score.    … Expand
  28. Jorchking
    Nov 1, 2020
    4
    Es un juego que sigue divirtiendo y se siente lo "Battlefield", pero es muy triste lo que han hecho con esta saga. Parece que a DICE le va quedando grande tanta responsabilidad.
    Lo han usado como campaña política en cuanto a la igualdad sexista (parece que hay más mujeres que hombres), desafiaron a los mismos compradores de la franquicia (insólito), censura, falla argumental y de    Es un juego que sigue divirtiendo y se siente lo "Battlefield", pero es muy triste lo que han hecho con esta saga. Parece que a DICE le va quedando grande tanta responsabilidad.
    Lo han usado como campaña política en cuanto a la igualdad sexista (parece que hay más mujeres que hombres), desafiaron a los mismos compradores de la franquicia (insólito), censura, falla argumental y de precisión en cuanto a la posición histórica donde se quiere situar el juego, sin contenido básicamente tanto en multijugador como en campaña (es muy corta y mala, de las peores)... Todo lo que no debió hacer lo ha hecho.

    Los errores principales: - Lo mismo que Battlefield 1 pero esta vez aún más desafiante y marcado (algo que les terminó costando caro): Agenda de "diversidad e igualdad" que lo expresan no sólo en la portada (la portada debe ser representativo del acontecimiento, pero de nuevo pusieron a una minoría como la mujer en la 2ª Guerra Mundial) sino también en todo el juego... De manera irreal se ve a veces hasta más cantidad de mujeres y negros que de nazis blancos arios... Insólito - Multijugador decepcionante: Los mapas son mediocres y todo lo que es diversidad de armas (esta era importante y no lo otro) es flojo. - Mismo error que Battlefield 1: Campaña muy mala con mini historias de fascículo, cortas, con imprecisión histórica y desperdicio de la temática de la 2ª Guerra Mundial. Parece que para EA y Dice está mal ser blanco, rubio y ario, que hay que meter mujeres y negros en esos lugares (claramente, una bajada de línea). Les creería, pero es la 2ª vez consecutiva que lo hacen. - Censura de símbolos históricos de la Guerra como la de los nazis. Guste o no, forman parte de nuestra historia. -Battle Royale muerto.

    En fin, el mayor pecado de este juego es tener escaso contendido. A las 10 horas ya no sabía qué hacer, se hace repetitivo y aburrido. La campaña es ultra decepcionante.
    Calificación de juego: 4.5. Calificación por politización, campaña de "igualdad y diversidad" en acontecimientos donde no hay lugar a eso, y falta de respeto a la Segunda Guerra Mundial: 2.
    Edito: Recomiendo Call of Duty WWII en su lugar que narra mejor los hechos de la Guerra Mundial, aunque igual no llega a ser épico como uno espera de una temática así, pero algo es algo.    … Expand
  29. Atyne
    Jan 26, 2022
    4
    +no spread
    +no suppression
    +some fun maps +sounds +crouch-sprint +leaning +satisfying sniping +good movement design (speed, inertia, ability to jump while aiming, etc) -random recoil -stuttering and terrible optimization -forced TAA by default -no anti-cheat -no team balancer -glitchy movement and animations/actions -terrible weapon and vehicle balance -UI -matchmaking    +no spread
    +no suppression
    +some fun maps
    +sounds
    +crouch-sprint
    +leaning
    +satisfying sniping
    +good movement design (speed, inertia, ability to jump while aiming, etc)

    -random recoil
    -stuttering and terrible optimization
    -forced TAA by default
    -no anti-cheat
    -no team balancer
    -glitchy movement and animations/actions
    -terrible weapon and vehicle balance
    -UI
    -matchmaking
    -temporary gamemodes
    -no atmosphere
    -campaign is a parody...    … Expand
  30. Klofi
    Sep 25, 2019
    4
    So broken even a year after release... Bugs, cheaters everywhere, no auto-balance so games ending with 14 vs 4 players are common...
Page:

Awards & Rankings

53
#53 Best PC Game of 2018
2
#2 Most Discussed PC Game of 2018
7
#7 Most Shared PC Game of 2018

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
81

Generally favorable reviews - based on 52 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 45 out of 52
  2. Mixed: 7 out of 52
  3. Negative: 0 out of 52
  1. CD-Action
    Nov 14, 2019
    85
    It’s far from being ideal but all the glitches and shortcomings don’t ruin the overall fun of Battlefield V’s multiplayer experience. Although the single player portion of the game is not bad at all, I would have been disappointed if I bought the game just for it. [13/2018, p.56]
  2. PLAY! Zine
    Mar 5, 2019
    80
    In Battlefield V we got back to WW2, but with refined gunplay and death system which works great. There are also little problems such as low number of maps and stability issues, that are taking the fun away, but nothing that can't be fixed.
    Read full review
  3. LEVEL (Czech Republic)
    Dec 31, 2018
    80
    A great World War II shooter that will grow and improve. Do not buy the game because of its singleplayer, but if you consider the campaign a bonus to the multiplayer, you will be satisfied. [Issue#291]
See all critic reviews »