- Publisher: Electronic Arts
- Release Date: Oct 25, 2011
- Also On: PlayStation 3, Xbox 360
User Score
Generally favorable reviews- based on 5642 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 4,003 out of 5642
-
Mixed: 872 out of 5642
-
Negative: 767 out of 5642
Buy Now
Review this game
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- By date
- Most helpful
-
Jun 4, 2013Terribly linear single player, multiplayer horribly optimized and quick match making is awful, I would rather play the older BF series than this hunk of crap.
-
Oct 26, 2011
-
Nov 7, 2011Hide in the bushes and snipe. Or leave the bushes and get sniped. Or maybe you can get blinded by a flashlight in broad daylight from 100ft away. Awesome.
-
Oct 28, 2011
-
Oct 31, 2011
-
Oct 31, 2011
-
Nov 4, 2011
-
Nov 6, 2011Graphic is astonishing despite moderate system requirement. All other aspects of SP are plain, boring and inexcusably worthless. MP at a first glance is good, but not excellent.
-
Mar 15, 2012
-
Jun 29, 2012This game is 10 times better then COD thats why im giving it a score 3. The biggest thing in this game that bothers me is too much bloom in multiplayer and graphics arent really that good if you look very closely. There are no numbers for mouse sensitivity so i have to guess. No battlerecorder, battlelog is pain in the a**. Also hit detection is broken in multiplayer.
-
Nov 10, 2011As much fun and action packed as the smaller maps can be, trudging across a map the size of Nebraska, only to be picked off by a sniper, or shot by a seemingly INVINCIBLE helicopter just doesn't seem like an enjoyable multiplayer experience to me. Campaign = YAWN.
-
Nov 10, 2011pros: nice visuals. vehicles in mp are good
cons: singleplayer is lifted almost directly form the mw series, mp battles are slow and only 5 maps? really? -
Jan 13, 2013
-
Nov 11, 2011
-
Feb 9, 2014
-
Nov 14, 2011
-
Nov 16, 2011
-
May 16, 2012
-
Jul 12, 2012This game is not very good. I found it disappointing after bad company 2. Multiplayer maps are not interesting. As a newbie having to play against 500+ hour veterans is very frustrating.
-
Apr 24, 2012
-
Dec 13, 2011
-
Feb 20, 2012
-
Jun 1, 2014This review contains spoilers, click expand to view.
-
Nov 9, 2012After loading it 3x and spending hours on the phone trying to get to play and researching stuff, it finally played, and I was very impressed
-
Jan 21, 2013EA last purchase for me. They've completely killed the team play, cooperation and epic battles for which the battlefield series are known, and put great graphics for all the COD kids to be happy with. No commander? No general orders? No voice in-game? Cya EA.
-
Jun 23, 2013This review contains spoilers, click expand to view.
-
Jan 25, 2014
-
Apr 7, 2017
-
Oct 30, 2011
-
Feb 17, 2012the singleplayer have good graphics and gameplay.
but the multiypalyer are just awful with full bugs and feel like World War 2 combat.
vehicles and tanks not gives realism feeling and the physics are very not real...
totally spend of 50 bucks
Awards & Rankings
-
Mar 7, 2012It's all a matter of taste, after all. They each provide a certain type of entertainment – when talking about Battlefield 3, it involves a bigger game, more open in its possibilities and more spectacular. But on a longer timeline, less frantic and with fewer Bruce Willis scenes than the mass appeal beast it set itself to dethrone.
-
LEVEL (Czech Republic)Jan 20, 2012No, Battlefield 3 is not the best game of today. But good looking – definitely. It also has an absolutely addictive multiplayer. Who needs more? [Dec 2011]
-
PC PowerPlayDec 4, 2011Both a triumphant leap forward and a return to form for the Battlefield series. This is the best multiplayer shooter on PC. [Christmas 2011, p.58]