User Score
2.1

Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 4864 Ratings

User score distribution:
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
  1. Nov 21, 2021
    9
    TBH I don't understand the negativity. I played the game now for a bit over 10 hours, never had any crashes and game runs smooth. Also with Portal and the main modes there is more than enough to play. There are some minor things to patch like Assault Rifles or the Hovercrafts, but no reason to rate this game below 8.

    I personally really like it :)
  2. Nov 22, 2021
    9
    I don't fully understand the negative reviews of this game. Yes there are some minor issues but these are being addressed and overall I am finding it a lot of fun to play and can't see it getting boring anytime soon. There's a lot of potential with it and I'm looking forward to seeing how it evolves over the next year.
  3. Nov 22, 2021
    9
    Ok guys, what kind of game, other that Battlefiekld 2042 brings :
    - Huge maps with such a great level design and verticality ?
    - Meteo events that modify the gameplay and challenge players strategies ? - 64 vs 64 players in teams, by foot or in vehicules to create an epic and unforgettable war experience ? So ? Yeah, you can keep serarching... no other game does this and certainly
    Ok guys, what kind of game, other that Battlefiekld 2042 brings :
    - Huge maps with such a great level design and verticality ?
    - Meteo events that modify the gameplay and challenge players strategies ?
    - 64 vs 64 players in teams, by foot or in vehicules to create an epic and unforgettable war experience ?

    So ? Yeah, you can keep serarching... no other game does this and certainly not that good!
    Battlefield 2042 is already a hit, truely addictive and with a great depth in content and strategies thanks to specialists among others.
    And yeah, I assume, specialists is one of the best design idea of this Battlefield: it doesn't replace classic classes but completes it by bringing a really interesting customization level (you can create and customize your classes in the game to play as you like).

    It's already good and it will be really great in the next few months after some patches.
    I can't wait to see how the game will evolve in the next two years.

    See you on the battlefield !
    Expand
  4. Nov 25, 2021
    9
    Honestly i have to say that this game is very good, i had extreme fun and a blast with friends which is the core of a videogame, anyway i can see that thousands are unhappy by the game and while it is easy to understand them, they are simply crying because a tripe A game isn't perfect. Yes the game has broken issues such as bugs and servers going crazy but knowing DICE and experience fromHonestly i have to say that this game is very good, i had extreme fun and a blast with friends which is the core of a videogame, anyway i can see that thousands are unhappy by the game and while it is easy to understand them, they are simply crying because a tripe A game isn't perfect. Yes the game has broken issues such as bugs and servers going crazy but knowing DICE and experience from previous BF games i can confidently say it will get only better, and i never get the players that complain about it being different from older BF games and all forget what buggy messes DICE released back in the day and now look at those games after patches! To end off i want for people to stop crying that this game was released early, yes it was but the fact that it will be improves is 100% and if you want to buy BF 2042 i suggest buying it in 1-3 month later when this game will be fixed Expand
  5. Dec 25, 2021
    9
    this game is pretty fun to play solo or with friends. Only downside are some minor bugs but overall the game is fun
  6. Jan 28, 2022
    9
    I don't know why people are hating it maybe its a little bit over priced but its actually very good maybe its unfinished but i hope people will like it soon.
  7. Feb 19, 2022
    9
    As a person who has played almost all Battlefield games from Bad Company 2, I must say that the game is amazing. I have lowered my rating because of the huge maps with lots of open areas, that is only thing i don't like about it.
  8. Nov 15, 2021
    8
    The gameplay is good and fun.

    It needs some work, add some minor features from past BF game. But its all mostly little superficial things. "Oh no, I can't see the insignificant Kill Death ratios of a 120 other players in an objective gameplay. Unplayable!" No. Its fine. You can see the match score/tickets. Your own stats... Its fine. Its missing a lot of little things, but the
    The gameplay is good and fun.

    It needs some work, add some minor features from past BF game. But its all mostly little superficial things.

    "Oh no, I can't see the insignificant Kill Death ratios of a 120 other players in an objective gameplay. Unplayable!" No. Its fine. You can see the match score/tickets. Your own stats... Its fine.

    Its missing a lot of little things, but the core gameplay is there and its good.

    It's not the train-wreck a lot of whiny internet trolls are making it out to be.
    Expand
  9. Nov 16, 2021
    8
    First of all. BF2042 is fun. A real gameplay improvement over past Battlefields simply because of quality of life gameplay improvements such as vehicle drops and being able to change load outs on the fly. It’s a good game because it allows you to mix different eras of Battlefield bringing some of the best maps, vehicles and weapons from past games. Meta critic user ratings has lost itsFirst of all. BF2042 is fun. A real gameplay improvement over past Battlefields simply because of quality of life gameplay improvements such as vehicle drops and being able to change load outs on the fly. It’s a good game because it allows you to mix different eras of Battlefield bringing some of the best maps, vehicles and weapons from past games. Meta critic user ratings has lost its value because people use them just as a way to criticize specific companies and provide a completely emotional and biased review. Many didn’t even buy the game and played the final version. There are people giving reviews of the beta. What’s the value in that? I see people giving high praises to previous Battlefield titles that had a pretty low user score. So whenever a new Battlefiled title comes out it seems previous titles are great games while the latest release is the worst Battlefield ever. Let’s be clear about what is actually bad or needs improvement.
    - Some things are or feel unfinished in BF2042. There is no voice comm for starters that is so needed for squad gameplay and that was clearly left out in order to release the game on schedule.
    - There are no scoreboards as in previous games. I understand why but there should be an option to enable them. The reason not to use scoreboards to motivate players is indeed logical. Battlefield games are not like COD. They are focused on theaters of war where everyone big or small contributes to win or lose in countless ways. In past Battlefield games there were players that were constantly on the top of the scoreboard for some arbitrary logic. Either they were a medic healing everyone and getting lots of points. Or they are sniping killing everyone from a well protected position thus ending the match with a great K/D ratio. And so on and on. Meanwhile there is this guy that has been transporting troops from one point to the other. Or focusing in defending a couple of points that gets a low score. Like it or not that low score removes the fun and sense of achievement. So in BF2042 Dice decided to instead give more focus to how players contributed in the overall match than a typical scoreboard. Most heals, most covering fire and so on. It’s a good approach considering the type of game but choice is something that should always be a priority. Dice should focus on bringing scoreboards back and giving people the choice to enable it or not. A valid point of criticism is also that without a scoreboard or a team overview so to speak its hard to know if a server is balanced. Or if there are too many specialists of a certain kind. There is a small advantage for not having a scoreboard. In previous Battlefields once people noticed a team was losing and players were starting to quit the game, more people quit making it harder for the losing team to recover. Keeping players ignorant is sometimes the best choice.
    Some people are complaining about no classes. That I don’t understand. In each Battlefield and COD game people criticize in how it’s always the same and they need to evolve. Well they evolved. The new system does bring an additional flavor to the game. Does has advantages over past games. Specifically the fact that you can better tailor your character to how you want to play instead of the old class system that forced you to use a limited loadout depending on the class you chose. In BF2042 the loadout is fully customizable. Your not limited by a fixed class. Specialists give you specific gadgets and passive traits that suit different people play styles without overpowering you. It is clearly better than past games. People resist to change but also complain if a game doesn’t evolve. If you search online for actual comparisons between the classes and the new specialist system you will see that those that took the time to compare it always end up with the conclusion that the new system is better.
    Performance wise the game needs improvement. Graphics are really good but not to the point that for some reason a RTX 3080 struggles to get 60 FPS with RTX ON. Also the lack of Ray traced reflections makes no sense. It’s a step back from what people expect. In any case the game runs fine and looks amazing with some minor tweaks.
    Some last notes. Environmental hazards, changing weather and gameplay conditions. Map flow and so on are usually left out from player reviews. The fact that there are so many weapons because you have content from different eras is also left out. So keep that in mind. All these things are positive things that are only available in BF2042. A clear evolution over past games.
    So given all the pros and cons I’m giving BF2042 a solid 8. It’s a good game that could be better with some improvements as detailed above. It brings enough progress to the formula to be considered better than some competitor games and even past games in the series.
    Expand
  10. Nov 18, 2021
    8
    I am playing and having a great time with friends.

    This is different from the typical battlefield and that is a good thing and I have been playing every game since BF1942 release. Bugs? yes, they can get frustrating but it is currently "early access" and a game release in 2021. Simply I am having a great time: + Friends working as a team supporting each other and getting crazy KD
    I am playing and having a great time with friends.

    This is different from the typical battlefield and that is a good thing and I have been playing every game since BF1942 release.

    Bugs? yes, they can get frustrating but it is currently "early access" and a game release in 2021.

    Simply I am having a great time:
    + Friends working as a team supporting each other and getting crazy KD just due to good team work
    + Fun to drive vehicles (osprey ftw)
    + New individual operators with cool things (Wing suit is amazing)

    - some vehicles/guns need a balance update
    - bugs, ie; getting stuck dead :(
    Expand
  11. Jan 10, 2022
    8
    I am in love with this game. Battlefield is back! Game is beautiful, innovative and is up to date. I got average 62.8 FPS with Core i5 11 gen and RX 570 on Full HD and medium graphics. I am pretty satisfied!
  12. Sep 9, 2023
    8
    To be honest, it's not as bad as some people make it out to be. I've played around 30 hours, mostly with friends on Portal and with Bots, but I've had a fun time overall and feel like I've gotten my money worth so to speak. I do feel like it launched early, and I've experienced the same bugs and crashes everyone else has, but the game is playable and has enough content to at least be aTo be honest, it's not as bad as some people make it out to be. I've played around 30 hours, mostly with friends on Portal and with Bots, but I've had a fun time overall and feel like I've gotten my money worth so to speak. I do feel like it launched early, and I've experienced the same bugs and crashes everyone else has, but the game is playable and has enough content to at least be a 4-6/10. Again, I know it's not perfect. Here's hoping they support the game instead of dropping it from the initial release stink.

    Update November 2022: The game is in a much better place now. I've easily put over 100 hours into the game since launch and believe 2042 is closer to what it should have been at launch. They've added tons of new items in game, new maps, season passes, new operatives, weapons, equipment, and rebalanced the classes for a more authentic Battlefield feeling. I'd highly recommend giving the game another go.

    Edit to the edit: 330 hours of gameplay and it's by far one of my favorites. Pick it up for $20 and enjoy a great game.
    Expand
  13. Nov 14, 2021
    8
    The game is mostly good. Setting, weapons, gunplay is all pretty on point.

    It needs some UI tweaks/optimization options. I have a pretty good machine with a 3060ti and haven’t experienced the FPS issues others are having. (Not running max settings obv) Map size will take some getting used to if people aren’t calling in vehicles. My biggest complaint especially at the lower levels is this
    The game is mostly good. Setting, weapons, gunplay is all pretty on point.

    It needs some UI tweaks/optimization options. I have a pretty good machine with a 3060ti and haven’t experienced the FPS issues others are having. (Not running max settings obv)

    Map size will take some getting used to if people aren’t calling in vehicles. My biggest complaint especially at the lower levels is this feels like an infantry farming simulator. Vehicles are crazy strong and at low levels you don’t have the tools to deal with them.

    Specialist system in its current iteration I would probably rate a 5. Most abilities are useless or barely noticeable where 1-2 are leaps and bounds better than everything else. (Looking at you walk hack and grappling hook)
    Expand
  14. Nov 14, 2021
    8
    Have been away while they did WW1 and WW2 games so been some time since i played Battlefield.
    I think the game is kinda fun actually, it feels a bit more arcade with the weapons which i like.
    The graphics are good, its fast paced and overall a fun game.
  15. Nov 13, 2021
    8
    The completeness of the game is still low, but I believe they will complete the game with patches like their previous works.
  16. Nov 15, 2021
    8
    in two days I realized that I like the game, there is something to work on, but when you win then you understand this is what you need!
  17. Nov 13, 2021
    8
    i think the reviews are blowing it out of proportion how bad the game is, ive played 12 hours and had a blast with the game, its got its issues but they are very dependant on the system being used ive found, i play on a 5900x/3080 pc and at 4k using DLSS quality and get a fairly consistent 80fps or so, many of the bugs in the beta are gone, flying vehicles dont teleport no more etc. therei think the reviews are blowing it out of proportion how bad the game is, ive played 12 hours and had a blast with the game, its got its issues but they are very dependant on the system being used ive found, i play on a 5900x/3080 pc and at 4k using DLSS quality and get a fairly consistent 80fps or so, many of the bugs in the beta are gone, flying vehicles dont teleport no more etc. there are some issues though like in portal i cant seem to ever put an attachment on my gun and trying to do so ive had two crashes in 12 hours. a friend of mine uses a 7700k/2060 pc and has far far more issues than me as one would expect but it seems the game is very very cpu dependant, anything less than the very latest CPU's seem to be having all kinds of problems and that IS on the developers and EA, they needed more optimization time and players are suffering now.

    portal itself has been awesome, some of the bullet spread of weapons has been questionable but the maps remastered are great and the ability to create wild game modes is in full swing you just have to go and find them.

    hazard zone has been a surprising amount of fun, very difficult but very rewarding all the same, its pretty shallow and i have 1300 hours in escape from tarkov so this is very very shallow by comparison but its a side mode to complement portal and conquest and im ok with that, brings my boys together for some proper team work and its ok, i like it.

    the main conquest is as it has been for a few years now which is chaotic and crazy, the new maps i like, reminds me of the big maps in BF2 and that encourages sticking closer to your team mates and using transport, they all have their hot zones and filter points and as long as your pc can handle it the action stays smooth enough to have a good game.

    its far from a solid 10, but its in no way a 1/2/3, absolutely no way. its a bit of a mess but there is a good game in here with potential, the hate for EA is justified though, its quite clear its another game pushed out of the door when it needs another 6 months on the burner but im still having a good time with it, i realize that's rare and its in such a mess who knows what your experience may be like, for that reason it might be wise to wait on some patches and polish but i still think its a good game in general.
    Expand
  18. Nov 15, 2021
    8
    i dont get why peolpe dont like this game, sure there are some flaws but it is a genuenly fun game, if you not sure about it, get the EA pass it like 6NZD and try it out for yourself
    also there is destruction
  19. Nov 20, 2021
    8
    The beta and early access were _dysmal_ - a dumpster fire of bugs, stuttering and general crappiness. But, since the day one patch, the game is certainly a lot more polished and very playable. Content is a little light, and compared to other BFs there is a lot missing. Some of the changes, like the menu system are a bit meh, but you get used to it and it does work. It strikes me that'sThe beta and early access were _dysmal_ - a dumpster fire of bugs, stuttering and general crappiness. But, since the day one patch, the game is certainly a lot more polished and very playable. Content is a little light, and compared to other BFs there is a lot missing. Some of the changes, like the menu system are a bit meh, but you get used to it and it does work. It strikes me that's just stuff that will come eventually, but I'm dinging it one point for that. There's still minor issues, including balance issues - but what game doesn't have that at launch. Expand
  20. Nov 16, 2021
    8
    Fantastic game for having fun. I was playing hundreds of hours in 3rd and 4th BF and was missing modern war very much. And this game is fun!
    It just needs a bit more polishing. Still, there are many bugs (I think it is a feature of the series), and some tweaks must be done to UI.
    Overall even in this state, I had a lot of fun.
  21. Jun 24, 2023
    8
    Actually really loving this game. Played it because it came to gamepass and was pleasantly surprised. Good shooting mechanics, interesting character abilities.
    Wish they kept some of the old BF charm but it's not too bad. Hopefully they will learn from their mistakes by the next entry. But even with all its flaws, I still play this every day. It's just fun!
  22. Nov 15, 2021
    8
    It's my first bf experience and im having a lot of fun so far. I don't really understand how the game works and i don't really care what my job in the mission is. I just wanna see things exolode and have fun :) battlefield is a cool funshooter.
  23. Oct 13, 2022
    8
    Après des début difficile, le jeu a bien gagner en qualité.
    La plus par des Bugs sont corriger, l'optimisation améliorer, les map reworké et le nouveau contenue bien que petit est de bonne qualité.
  24. Nov 18, 2021
    8
    Игра понравилась, играть в неё буду много
  25. Nov 14, 2021
    8
    I'm having fun with it. Just want lobby/squad voice chat. Otherwise it's a nice fresh version of battlefield that brings back the big battle fun of conquest I loved from battlefield 4. I would give it a 9 but absolutely nobody helps revive. It's really annoying. Otherwise a lot of fun so far!
  26. Nov 14, 2021
    8
    Too many bugs and a few missing features. I still dont understand the negative reviews, bc the gameplay itself is a blast
  27. Feb 11, 2023
    8
    Definitely better than what it was when it first came out. Since able to get a full squad in about 95% of matches.
  28. Nov 15, 2021
    8
    It's a good game don't listen to the hate. They are feeding off each other. Give the game a chance it reminds me of the launch of bf4 ya its rough but it's still worth playing and it will only improve from here. Pretty much every where has a refund policy so try the game and if you hate it refund it but I urge you to give it a chance don't let the hate train shut down another good gameIt's a good game don't listen to the hate. They are feeding off each other. Give the game a chance it reminds me of the launch of bf4 ya its rough but it's still worth playing and it will only improve from here. Pretty much every where has a refund policy so try the game and if you hate it refund it but I urge you to give it a chance don't let the hate train shut down another good game maybe even a great game in the making. Expand
  29. Nov 15, 2021
    8
    In my opinion, people are definitely exaggerating how bad this game is. Sure, it has it's issues, but I really don't think issues like lackluster performance, no chat, and no scoreboard merit all the 0s I've been seeing. I wouldn't be surprised if people are just review bombing at this point, even those who've never even played the game and just want to jump on the bandwagon of hate. FirstIn my opinion, people are definitely exaggerating how bad this game is. Sure, it has it's issues, but I really don't think issues like lackluster performance, no chat, and no scoreboard merit all the 0s I've been seeing. I wouldn't be surprised if people are just review bombing at this point, even those who've never even played the game and just want to jump on the bandwagon of hate. First of all, the specialists aren't all that bad. I know the class system is miles better, but some of the specialist abilities can lead to some pretty awesome moments and plays. Also, a specialist system will likely lead to more content being released over time, which will keep the player base more engaged.
    Second, the environments are actually decently destructible, it's just the maps people have been playing on don't have much to offer in terms of buildings and things like that. I've also seen a lot of people complaining about the lack of chat, but really, not many people talk to randoms in battlefield games, or at least that what I've noticed, and when you want to talk with your friends, just use something else like discord. The sound quality will likely better anyway. However, there are definitely
    some pretty glaring that are pretty impossible to ignore. The first is weapon variety. Only about 23 guns in the main game is pretty pathetic. I know most of the guns are in portal but I would have gladly waited another half year to at least have more than 4 ARs to choose from. Also, the servers suck pretty hard and the lack of scoreboard really annoys me. But overall, I think people are seriously over-hating a game that is actually really fun at it's core.
    Expand
  30. Oct 10, 2022
    8
    October 2022: The new and reworked maps make the game one of the best shooters I’ve played in a minute. But, I can confidently say they should never had left the standard class system battlefield was good at.
Metascore
68

Mixed or average reviews - based on 74 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 29 out of 74
  2. Negative: 11 out of 74
  1. Feb 15, 2022
    70
    All in all, Battlefield 2042 has been a real labour of love for me. The initial launch was remarkably underbaked, but I can’t deny the enjoyment that comes from firing a rocket launcher into a tornado. This may not be the best FPS multiplayer game available, and there are still plenty of issues that need ironing out, but there are occasionally some thrilling moments that you won’t be able to experience in the likes of Call of Duty or Fortinte. It remains frustrating having to pay full price for a multiplayer game, but if you’re already a fan of the franchise and don’t mind missing out on the campaign, you’ll likely enjoy yourself here. The nostalgic aspect of Portal mode will also draw fans in, and of course, the 4K graphics make it very pretty game, even if it has its cracks.
  2. Dec 23, 2021
    40
    The weakest first-person shooter in the history of DICE. Even, by some miracle, the studio manages to fix the most glaring mistakes and reanimate the abysmal netcode, this game will not become Battlefield at its core.
  3. Despite the promising Portal mode, Battlefield 2042, which uses players as a tester, still gives the impression of an incomplete game with its errors and important problems.