Battlefield 2042

 PC
User Score
2.1

Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 4864 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 618 out of 4864
  2. Mixed: 242 out of 4864
  3. Negative: 4,004 out of 4864
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. GamersAreAwesom
    Aug 31, 2023
    6
    Will raise score to 7 if it can release a proper single player campaign, not the game is lack of content considerablely.
  2. Niveru
    Jul 30, 2023
    6
    A slightly disappointing game that claims to give us the classic Battlefield. It wasn't even playable in its original form, but at the time of writing this review, they are trying to fix the game's issues.
  3. AgentLvi
    Jun 18, 2023
    7
    Decent game. The story is so --so, scoring is great, visual is decent, and the voice is also great
  4. Swager187
    May 21, 2023
    6
    As someone who never really played the Battlefield series, I was excited when I saw the trailer for 2042. I even got a chance to play the beta, and I have to say that the beta has proved to be a more complete experience than the full release.

    Unpolished, sloppy, buggy, glitchy, uninspiring, lackluster, and disappointing are only a few of the words that come close to accurately    As someone who never really played the Battlefield series, I was excited when I saw the trailer for 2042. I even got a chance to play the beta, and I have to say that the beta has proved to be a more complete experience than the full release.

    Unpolished, sloppy, buggy, glitchy, uninspiring, lackluster, and disappointing are only a few of the words that come close to accurately describing the game. From the unbalanced weapons, to the horrible cross-play situation (I mean really? PC can't play with PS4 and XBOX One?) this game proves that appearances can be deceiving. It certainly could be great, but in its current state, I would never pay $60 dollars for it.I wouldn't even pay $30-$40 for it. You are better off spending your money on Halo Infinite than this game. Maybe in a couple of months they'll release the game in the state it was supposed to be in. User Score:2

    Update:

    I played this again in 2023 and after several much needed polishes the game is close to being what it should have been. Weapon balancing appears to have been more fine tuned and bugs are much less common. However, the poor cross play experience and addition of several uninteresting game modes, as well as the launch experience, still leave a sour taste in my mouth. Hopefully EA learns from this mistake with the recent comment on Battlefield's future, but with EA you never know.    … Expand
  5. nomad1326
    Apr 23, 2023
    7
    This chapter of Battlefield is close to BF3, as for me. There are some interesting levels. Unfortunately, BF2042 has strange moments with balance in some cases (only 1 air fighter for 64 players) and too many prospect spaces. Not the best, but definitely not a bad game.
  6. Clintoff
    Dec 22, 2022
    7
    This game definitely started out in what was an absolutely terrible state. But, over the year or so of constant updating and development it now finds itself as a genuinely fun game with more and more content being added over time. My biggest flaw at the moment with this game is the player population. Although the game has improved as I stated before. A vast majority of the initial hype forThis game definitely started out in what was an absolutely terrible state. But, over the year or so of constant updating and development it now finds itself as a genuinely fun game with more and more content being added over time. My biggest flaw at the moment with this game is the player population. Although the game has improved as I stated before. A vast majority of the initial hype for this game has been completely lost and if you want to play anything other than conquest or the featured mode at the time you'll likely be stuck sitting as you wait for other players to join the server.… Expand
  7. chergiio
    Dec 22, 2022
    6
    i tried it 1 year later, and the game runs smoothly on 64 player conquest matches, i hadn´t any trouble for that, but it lacks a lot content from previous series, it feels less tactical, and it is more oriented to action. Specialists change drastically the roles in game, sometimes they could add some good ideas, but some other times they can broke the game, it sometimes is less oriented toi tried it 1 year later, and the game runs smoothly on 64 player conquest matches, i hadn´t any trouble for that, but it lacks a lot content from previous series, it feels less tactical, and it is more oriented to action. Specialists change drastically the roles in game, sometimes they could add some good ideas, but some other times they can broke the game, it sometimes is less oriented to teamwork and is more focus on personal experience, i recommend it on sale, and it really needs lot more content.… Expand
  8. BeansV6
    Nov 20, 2022
    7
    The game today is much much more improved and the updated content is very high quality and isn't as hit or miss as past games, gunplay, gameplay and ect has improved by a ton, the OST is subjective and depends on your tastes, the unliked specialist system is getting reworked to be much more like classes (but still exists), seems like DICE really do have a straight plan for the game and howThe game today is much much more improved and the updated content is very high quality and isn't as hit or miss as past games, gunplay, gameplay and ect has improved by a ton, the OST is subjective and depends on your tastes, the unliked specialist system is getting reworked to be much more like classes (but still exists), seems like DICE really do have a straight plan for the game and how they want to update it.

    But also: if quality over quantity updates are not your style its gonna be a long wait for you, the performance is a bit bad but is much more improved and playable than launch, vehicle balance is a bit rough but is still much more balanced and even than BF4's LAVS and Birds, no all chat, hazard zone is cancelled, portal is filled with hardcore and xp farms only.

    but the main gameplay is fun and replayable with missions that give you weapons and other stuff to keep you active    … Expand
  9. KevLooney
    Sep 14, 2022
    6
    Vehicles are a huge pain in the ass. ammo is always a problem. regeneration is too slow. 6/10
  10. Karlin_Kercer
    Jul 12, 2022
    7
    I like this game and a lot of bugs were fixed, BUT it has many problems, like a shortage of weapons, good maps, good gamemodes. It doesn't cost 50+ bucks.
  11. Rezoman
    Jul 6, 2022
    6
    Since the most recent update I’ve noticed that this game has definitely improved. The new map is fun and is well designed, My game doesn’t crash anymore, I haven’t seen any glitches since launch, and the new weapons are a nice edition. I see potential in this game and maybe if the next season really pushes some content out then this game can start getting better reviews.
  12. AndreiV2008
    May 13, 2022
    5
    The game is fun......But DICE has to fix and nerf stuf REALLY FAST like FASTER then Activision publishing a new Call of Dutty.
    when you get a new weapon you can play with it in multiplayer and get shot from the other end of he map or play in solo and fell absolutly no fun at all.
    DICE if you read this keep the good glitches and add content.
  13. Koval1984CZ
    Mar 22, 2022
    6
    Typické pro dnešní dobu vydat předběžný přístup vydávající se za 60 e AAA hru, ale kdo neignoruje dobu vý že je to už běžná praxe nejenom u Battlefieldu (Zlatej model Escape from Tarkov přístupu přes 5 let+ testování) Hráno 4k 38-45 fps na 1080 (dost to optimalizovaly).

    + dost zábavné + typický Battlefield + fungování synchronizace tolika lidi objektů atd na mapě (to je vzácnost v    Typické pro dnešní dobu vydat předběžný přístup vydávající se za 60 e AAA hru, ale kdo neignoruje dobu vý že je to už běžná praxe nejenom u Battlefieldu (Zlatej model Escape from Tarkov přístupu přes 5 let+ testování) Hráno 4k 38-45 fps na 1080 (dost to optimalizovaly).

    + dost zábavné
    + typický Battlefield
    + fungování synchronizace tolika lidi objektů atd na mapě (to je vzácnost v dnešní době)
    + velikost jakštakš
    + vozidla
    + počet hráčů 128 , 64 vz 64
    + konečně současná doba (je hrozný že takových her je tak málo kvalitních)

    - hra chystá jiný finanční model tím pádem ahoj mých 60 euro :-(
    - málo herních režimů, klidně at tam jsou jen dva ale at je to režim ze snahou reálně fungujících zbraní a ta s... (cenzura) pro masy jak to dělaji temeř všechny velké společnosti s papírovímy kulkamy a hedšoty co mají směšnou silu často 2x prostřelená hlava je jen malé bebíčko.
    - vychytávky co rengenujou lidi čily cheat system od vývojařu!
    Jinde je to pro mně u pvp důvod úplně obejít hru (pokud není snaha to udělat co nejvíc věrohodně pokus o reálné vyobrazení) tady dělám vyjmku
    - málo zbraní (nachystáno na drahé balíčky drsných OP operátorů a nových natuněných zbraní. Vše pouze za MAXI-transakce pravděpodobně, teda minitransakce
    - málo map
    - málo zastavěných map budovamy a zároven kvalita interieru. nevím který návrhář továren dělal všechny budovy ve hře
    - málo lesu a kvalitní zarostlé přírody
    - map je málo 7+
    - mapy jsou dost malé (neplatí pro hrače cod a podobných ...)
    - hud a menu nějak moc podobný a to ne k lepšímu se hrou cod atd
    - nějak se to podobá free hře v hudu
    - ovládání teamu a správa
    - typické op jednotky např vrtulníky s vydrží atomového bunkru
    - rotační kulomet má sílu menší jak jakákoliv zbran ve hře (snad)

    Protože vím jak to chodí, tak na dnešní hnusnou dobu hotfixu a petchů dávám tet 6/10.
    Až to trochu fixnou a přidají obsah, podle současné zábavy atd tipuji že hra bude skvělá
    A doufám že tu hru vývojaři nesmetou pod koberec, jen kvůli špatnému startu když už se dělá na novým Batlu postup by měl být podobný jako u cod s warzone.    … Expand
  14. Saulle_infDev
    Mar 16, 2022
    6
    L'offerta mette a disposizione 3 modalità, 1 classica con modalità conquista e sfondamento, un altra dove si devono raccogliere unità dati, e la terza (la più ambiziosa) modalità di alcuni precedenti Battlefield, qualche evento loro, e mappe fatte da altri videogiocatori che attraverso l'editor online si possono sbizzarrire con assets di alcuni Battlefield precedenti.
    Per gli altri    L'offerta mette a disposizione 3 modalità, 1 classica con modalità conquista e sfondamento, un altra dove si devono raccogliere unità dati, e la terza (la più ambiziosa) modalità di alcuni precedenti Battlefield, qualche evento loro, e mappe fatte da altri videogiocatori che attraverso l'editor online si possono sbizzarrire con assets di alcuni Battlefield precedenti.
    Per gli altri Battlefield di portal(la terza modalità) la configurazione delle armi dato il fatto che non sia possibile utilizzare la configurazione delle armi in tempo reale, mettere un mirino o altre cose diventa macchinoso.
    Grafica molto buona con un gioco di luci che a differenza del vecchio non ti immerge, promesse non mantenute completamente, e con edifici non distruttibili adeguatamente, mappe che da molti giocatori sono considerate troppo poche, io penso si sia il contrario (non so quante sono numericamente) ma comunque si deve tenere in considerazione la grandezza di queste mappe. L'aggiunta della configurazione delle armi durante i combattimenti è molto bella, anche se bisogna prima sbloccare i vari gadget. Non sono più presenti gli specialisti di "supporto, medico, assalto e scout" o meglio ci sono ma non sono le parti importanti, sono gli specialisti con gadget speciali, tra cui ci si ritrova un personaggio presente già in passato "Irish".
    A me personalmente piace, penso che le persone prima di criticare debbano prima approfondire il tutto.
    L'errore grave per me è quello di aver eliminato la modalità storia che a me è sempre piaciuta, gli sviluppatori dovrebbero fare qualcosa per salvare il titolo.    … Expand
  15. raedgamer7
    Mar 2, 2022
    6
    loooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooool
  16. Naish_Leenoyu
    Feb 11, 2022
    7
    Yes, there is poor optimization, yes, there are not many little things inherent in the games of the series, and there is still very little content with a backlog for future battle passes, but the gameplay is still a great pleasure
  17. EveryLevel
    Jan 25, 2022
    5
    It's not bad, It's not great. I mean I enjoyed it more then the last 2 BF games (BF1, BF5) I liked the idea but yea this tray of cookies needed more time in the oven. Too doughie 5 Bacon ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
  18. Vitamin-J
    Jan 14, 2022
    6
    It still feels a little like a Battlefield game but is missing some of its core elements.

    Classes are no longer a thing and instead, the gritty soldiers have been replaced with happy go lucky marvel character wanna' be's who have their nifty own little gadget. The game also has no culture, factions or asymetrical appeal like in previous games with both sides being the same. Having    It still feels a little like a Battlefield game but is missing some of its core elements.

    Classes are no longer a thing and instead, the gritty soldiers have been replaced with happy go lucky marvel character wanna' be's who have their nifty own little gadget.
    The game also has no culture, factions or asymetrical appeal like in previous games with both sides being the same. Having whatever weapon you want and whatever gear you want really takes away all the specialization feel of the old games.    … Expand
  19. Anarkroft
    Jan 14, 2022
    7
    Ha, enfin un opus Battlefield dans la guerre moderne !
    Ce préambule me donne le sourire : on part déjà sur le bon pied. Ça faisait trop longtemps qu'on enchainait des épisodes première ou seconde guerre, pas du tout adaptés à la jouabilité d'un BF.
    On retrouve donc nos armes sur un fond de guerre moderne, avec beaucoup de changements au tableau (et ça aussi ça fait du bien, les épisodes    Ha, enfin un opus Battlefield dans la guerre moderne !
    Ce préambule me donne le sourire : on part déjà sur le bon pied. Ça faisait trop longtemps qu'on enchainait des épisodes première ou seconde guerre, pas du tout adaptés à la jouabilité d'un BF.
    On retrouve donc nos armes sur un fond de guerre moderne, avec beaucoup de changements au tableau (et ça aussi ça fait du bien, les épisodes qui s'enchainent sans grand changement, c'est sympa 5mn mais pour le côté ludique, on repassera).
    Au programme : les classes sont des prétextes interchangeables (un médecin peut s'équiper d'une trousse de munitions ou bien d'un lance roquette), ce qui est pratique et polyvalent pour toutes les situations (+ possibilité de changer en cours d'une vie selon conditions). On découvre un côté "héros" comme dans pleinnnns de jeux à la mode, mais il faut surtout y voir des presets d'équipements. Toujours des paliers avec des niveaux liés à de l'expérience engrangée lors des parties dans le but de débloquer des classes, des armes ou encore des véhicules.
    Enfin un rééquilibrage des véhicules, les deux derniers opus leur faisant beaucoup trop la part belle (avions destructeurs et intuables, chars beaucoup trop puissants, enfin surtout l'infanterie pas assez puissante contre les blindés, des anti aériens inutiles et inutilisés, etc etc....) = presque tout ça est fini ! Comme n'importe quelle classe peut s'équiper d'un lance roquette ou d'un anti-aérien, la suprématie des véhicules est limitée : ils sont puissants, mais destructibles sans requérir 20 soldats au lance roquette. Il reste toujours le Z11 (pardon, il s'appelle Nightbird maintenant) qui est toujours trop puissant contre l'infanterie, mais c'est nettement moins pire qu'avant !
    Côté technique, c'est bien mais pas exempt de défauts. Le jeu est beaucoup (trop) consommateur pour le processeur, tandis que la carte graphique se repose; graphismes au mini ou au maxi, pas de gain de FPS pour qui aurait une carte graphique digne de ce nom. C'est clairement un point à améliorer, même avec un I7 dernière génération ça ne sera pas Byzance.
    Egalement au programme, le côté "mod" (mot ici mal employé, il s'agit plutôt de serveurs avec des règles personnalisées). Il est possible de jouer à d'anciennes cartes (par ex. de Bad Compagny 2), avec les règles et armes de l'époque, ou tout bonnement avec les armes du jeu normal. C'est une excellente idée, qui apporte une liste de maps jouables plus importante (mais pourquoi ne pas les avoir intégrées au jeu de base, que diable !).

    Malheureusement, on n'échappe pas aux modes actuelles du jeu vidéo : serveurs accessibles uniquement en matchmaking (génial, comment attendre 30s pour rien !), et un genre de "play of the game" en fin de partie, avec les persos qui sortent leur phrase toute faite : pour ce que ça apporte (c.a.d rien), ils auraient pu s'en passer.

    En résumé, un bon épisode. Pas parfait, mais nettement plus plaisant à jouer que les derniers. Au moins on est sur une bonne progression :)    … Expand
  20. Jestiker13
    Jan 12, 2022
    5
    Toutes les bonnes choses des séries BF depuis des années ont étaient supprimées. Pas de construction pour modifier et protéger les points, maps vide openfield pas de possibilité de se cacher ou d’avancer a couvert, destruction quasi inexistante. Des tanks digne de GTSport 145km/h je parle même pas des hélicoptères beaucoup trop puissants. Les véhicules repop trop rapidement et se régénèreToutes les bonnes choses des séries BF depuis des années ont étaient supprimées. Pas de construction pour modifier et protéger les points, maps vide openfield pas de possibilité de se cacher ou d’avancer a couvert, destruction quasi inexistante. Des tanks digne de GTSport 145km/h je parle même pas des hélicoptères beaucoup trop puissants. Les véhicules repop trop rapidement et se régénère seul et trop vite, un mécano et un chalumeau aurai était top. On passe des games à essayer tant bien que mal à tuer dés hélicoptères et tank si par chance vous êtes dans une bonne squad sinon c’est plutôt Runningfield 2042 qu’il aurai du s’appeler. Honnêtement après avec jouer 80h et lui avoir laisser ses chances je repart sur le 5. Le 128 n’apporte que confusion et bordel général aucune strats ne peuvent être mise en place hormis jouer B1/B2 pendant 45 min.… Expand
  21. StrangeQuarks
    Dec 25, 2021
    7
    Since all the post launch improvements that game has gotten significantly better. If the developers continue to fix problems and make improvements at this rate, we may have a great game on our hands. In its current state the game is fun, but not at all perfect. The game at this point is definitely worth looking at.
  22. Serpic
    Dec 20, 2021
    7
    Хочу сказать почему именно 7 - что-то среднее между "провал года, играть не могу" и "вообще кайф, не зря потратил деньги, просто шикарно". У этой игры есть некие недостатки (а назовите мне игру, в которой их нет), все мы люди и каждый воспринимает их по-своему.
    Мне понравилась графика. Она красивая, в синглрлеерный шутер я бы точно поиграл, но с другой стороны - тебе нужно предтоповое    Хочу сказать почему именно 7 - что-то среднее между "провал года, играть не могу" и "вообще кайф, не зря потратил деньги, просто шикарно". У этой игры есть некие недостатки (а назовите мне игру, в которой их нет), все мы люди и каждый воспринимает их по-своему.
    Мне понравилась графика. Она красивая, в синглрлеерный шутер я бы точно поиграл, но с другой стороны - тебе нужно предтоповое железо и желательно ГГц побольше, ибо что она делает с процессором, одним Дайсам известно. Повышение частоты с 4.8-4.9 до 5.1 даёт нехилый такой буст в производительности.
    Карты: большие... и, наверное, на этом всё. Часто нужно бегать, есть какой-никакой интерактив с ними, присутствует разрушаемость.
    Оружие: достаточно. Многим тут не понравилось, что их слишком мало, верно? Но вспомните прошлый части, сколько их Х вы выбирали? По какой причине выбирали? Почему НЕ брали то или иное оружие? По этой же причине их уменьшили и... правильно сделали. Но с другой стороны, некоторая техника стала ещё той болью в заднице, если вы не в скваде и не способы его уничтожить (всё ещё жду новое оружие, которое будет способно эффективно уничтожать технику пехотой, сейчас это ракетница и клеймор, для первого нужно 100500 попаданий, а до второго ты не добежишь, если против вас играют ноулайферы), а большинство играют в эту игру чисто расслабиться, побегать, пострелять. Игра в команде - это не совсем то, за чем приходят в эту игру.
    Остальное может в будущем изменят, доделают, но в сыром остатке остаётся довольно неплохая игра, которая даёт какие-то позитивные эмоции, но с другой стороны - это не совсем "готовый продукт" (про ценовую политику промолчу). Что-то работает криво или не работает совсем, нерегулярные патчи (для игры в таком виде они должны выходить каждую неделю, чтобы исправлять весь тот бред, что они выпустили, начиная от недавнего обновления, которое убивает DXR-1 с кривой визуальной составляющей с "готовностью к следующему выстрелы" до бесячей фичи, когда тебя бьёт вертушка, то тебя замедляет... ну или так кажется, из-за чего твои шансы на спасение равняются околонулевыми, визуально это выглядит плохо).    … Expand
  23. ManiniManono
    Dec 16, 2021
    7
    So in the current state i wouldnt say buy it BUT if you dont mind the fact that the game is currently in a bad condition go ahead the game is much fun for me even with performacne that is terrible im running a gtx 1070 with a 3700x and 24 gb of ram and i wont get more than 110 fps on areas with much space in huge clusters i get down to 74 fps on low settings with some config tweaks whenSo in the current state i wouldnt say buy it BUT if you dont mind the fact that the game is currently in a bad condition go ahead the game is much fun for me even with performacne that is terrible im running a gtx 1070 with a 3700x and 24 gb of ram and i wont get more than 110 fps on areas with much space in huge clusters i get down to 74 fps on low settings with some config tweaks when the game is fixed bug and performance wise i would say its a solid 8/10 (if some other stuff like 64 players were permanent a 9/10) btw portal is pretty fun but make sure u got all weapons unlocked since u wont level properly in portal because of the dumb bug abusers and hazard zone i allready dead like firestorm from bf v but overall a good shooter (but not the best bf experience at the moment)… Expand
  24. Skeler42
    Dec 16, 2021
    5
    This game is not that what we wanted. They made so much promotion that the game would be fcking awesome and i and many other beliefed it. I personaly thought it would be a "new" Battlefield4. When the beta was lauched i liked it to play. As the game got launched i ordered it. Now is the 16.12.2021 and the game got better. The hotfixes realy fixed great issues. I played it for 80 Hours nowThis game is not that what we wanted. They made so much promotion that the game would be fcking awesome and i and many other beliefed it. I personaly thought it would be a "new" Battlefield4. When the beta was lauched i liked it to play. As the game got launched i ordered it. Now is the 16.12.2021 and the game got better. The hotfixes realy fixed great issues. I played it for 80 Hours now and it is boring. I know there will be more Maps in the future.

    The issues.
    The main issue in my oppinion is that it doesnt FEEL like a Battlfeild of the previous time.
    The maps are to great and to open. U have to run so long find some enemies even in the 128 player mode. When u look at the maps from the previous BF games u will see, that the maps arent as good as the maps in the previous games.
    The weapons arent good. As an example u can look at the Assaultriffles. IRL u can use an AR on mid range fights but the new Battlefield made it impossible. To much recoil and spray for range fights. Shotguns are useless because there are not much closerange fights. The MPs are not useless because u can fight on close range and even midrange. The snipers doesnt feel good and i dont like em to play. The tactical rilfes are even more useless than ur mom in the bed ;).
    The game need way MOOREE weapons.

    Pros
    The graphics of the game are ok
    I enjoy the vehicles very much and they are very well balenced.
    After the third hotfix there where no fps drops and i got constant frames.
    I like the game and i think the game will get better in the future we have to wait again.    … Expand
  25. s_bar
    Dec 12, 2021
    7
    A good game, a system of operatives, as for me it's not a bad idea, that's just because of it I had to make a general level to open all weapons, which is not very cool when you want to play with the last sniper, and you won't get it in 10 hours of playing for sniper and for 30 total hours.
    Plus, the game is unfinished, both in the amount of content and in the little things like the zoom    A good game, a system of operatives, as for me it's not a bad idea, that's just because of it I had to make a general level to open all weapons, which is not very cool when you want to play with the last sniper, and you won't get it in 10 hours of playing for sniper and for 30 total hours.
    Plus, the game is unfinished, both in the amount of content and in the little things like the zoom of the map.
    Well, the technical condition is not perfect.    … Expand
  26. jack107
    Dec 9, 2021
    5
    A game with no core. All the maps of all out warfare feel empty and between every objective there is a long walk where you only have to run and nothing else. Hazard zone is boring and already dead after 1 month from the release of the game. Portal is the better than the other two modes but it is good only because it recycle maps and weapons from better battlefield games of the past.
    If    A game with no core. All the maps of all out warfare feel empty and between every objective there is a long walk where you only have to run and nothing else. Hazard zone is boring and already dead after 1 month from the release of the game. Portal is the better than the other two modes but it is good only because it recycle maps and weapons from better battlefield games of the past.
    If all of this is not enough, the game was full of bugs at release and today still has the same problems.    … Expand
  27. VTHokies1999
    Dec 7, 2021
    7
    The game has a ton of issues including bugs, performance, and questionable design changes but I'm still having fun with it. I do think there is a good game under all the bugs and performance problems. The design changes are what they are and I'm not happy with all of them but I can still have fun with the game.
  28. zhakhongir
    Dec 6, 2021
    7
    Все так хэйтят игру, большинство людей даже не играло и не имеет своего мнения, но тем не менее токсично, оскорбляя всех поносит игру и тех, кому она в чем-то понравилась. У игры куча проблем, но самое главное , что они исправимы. Во-первых оптимизация, не помню ни одного баттлфилда, который бы не лагал с выхода, здесь история стабильна, спустя время оптимизацию дорабатывают. Играю с БэдВсе так хэйтят игру, большинство людей даже не играло и не имеет своего мнения, но тем не менее токсично, оскорбляя всех поносит игру и тех, кому она в чем-то понравилась. У игры куча проблем, но самое главное , что они исправимы. Во-первых оптимизация, не помню ни одного баттлфилда, который бы не лагал с выхода, здесь история стабильна, спустя время оптимизацию дорабатывают. Играю с Бэд Компани 2. Карты, да, они ужасны. Всего два режима. Однако, прорыв играется бодро и весело. Разработчиками нужно добавить нормальные карты, что тоже исправимо (Слава богу шведов распустили и наконец-то снова игру будут доделывать Ripple Effect.) Честно, я получаю большое удовольствие от игры и я бы не назвал себя человеком, который закрывает глаза, слепо фанатично играя в то, что нельзя назвать игрой. У игры огромный потенциал, который не надо потерять, а он еще далеко не потерян, все в руках новой студии. Надеюсь, что EA не спустит проект , а допилит его, несмотря на огромную волну негодования. Вспомните тот же NoMan Sky, игру поносили на старте так, как не снится Баттлфилд 2042, но однако , несмотря ни на что, ее доделали. Следуйте этому примеру.… Expand
  29. ozgurpetro
    Dec 5, 2021
    7
    All-Out Warfare: 5/10 - Buggy, Clunky
    Hazard Zone: 8/10 - Really Good (Favourite mode)
    Portal: 6/10 - Buggy but fun game modes (Zombie infection mode is really good)

    Overally not great but fun
  30. WinterSoldierAM
    Dec 5, 2021
    5
    I would love to love this game. I'd love to sit here and write up the ways in which it pushes the franchise forward and captures on my and others' joy for the series, but the fundamental truth is this: this is the worst Battlefield game there is outside of the phone games. You can ignore the joke and rage reviews and even the user reviews entirely and still see that this game is gettingI would love to love this game. I'd love to sit here and write up the ways in which it pushes the franchise forward and captures on my and others' joy for the series, but the fundamental truth is this: this is the worst Battlefield game there is outside of the phone games. You can ignore the joke and rage reviews and even the user reviews entirely and still see that this game is getting torn apart by critics. And that is due to a few different things.

    The first thing you notice about the game is the completely different gameplay from previous games. No class system anymore, now you have operators. Each operator has a special ability but all operators can use the same equipment, weapons, secondaries, etc. What this does is it makes everyone run very similar loadouts. Worse, there are very few weapons in the game and the gunplay is fundamentally flawed. Not only does it not feel engaging or responsive, there is no weight to the guns and your shots rarely go where they are supposed to.

    This is a far cry from previous games that felt so responsive and rewarding when you could set up a snipers nest in a building miles away and snipe an enemy. 2042 is about spray and pray. To make matters worse, the maps are terrible. 128 players adds nothing because the maps are so large and desolate you can still run for ten minutes around the map and encounter nobody. That is until a helicopter carpet bombs you into oblivion becuase there is no cover anywhere. The modes are uninspired. While conquest is a decent improvement on previous games the map and player count detract from it. The other main mode feels like a poorer version of Battlefront 2's co op gameplay. The Portal is honestly really good except it is still held back by core gameplay issues. While you have access to classic modes, maps, and weapons and can even use classes, you still have to play via 2042's terrible gunplay and movement. If it was truly a legacy experience this may have been different. Another issue is the terrible ui. Marking targets is worse than previous games, scoreboards are gone, the colors are atrocious, and there is just so much clutter. I have played Battlefield 1942, 2, 3, 4, Heroes, Hardline, and 1 and all of them without exception are better than this game. Even V in it's current state is better and offers more fun and better gameplay mechanics. 2042 is what happens when you throw everything about a franchise out the window to pursue elements of other games without being able to capture upon what makes those other games fun to play. As it stands, it's just a mishmash of a bunch of different fps games with no real identity. It doesn't play like a Battlefield game and it doesn't play like other shooters. It feel lifeless, dull, and boring. I truly hope this game can be improved but from what I've seen it would take a total rehaul from the ground up. Given EA's proclivities to support games to that extent I would not advise others to hold out hope or put your faith in the company to do so. I highly recommend waiting on this game. I know many want that Battlefield experience. I do too. But this game will not give it to you. Try it on Xbox with Gamepass or origin pro on PC before buying and see for yourself. Maybe this game is much better a year from now, but as it stands it falls short of the series and of modern fps standards.    … Expand
prev
Page:

Awards & Rankings

2
#2 Most Discussed PC Game of 2021

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
68

Mixed or average reviews - based on 74 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 29 out of 74
  2. Mixed: 34 out of 74
  3. Negative: 11 out of 74
  1. Trusted Reviews
    Feb 15, 2022
    70
    All in all, Battlefield 2042 has been a real labour of love for me. The initial launch was remarkably underbaked, but I can’t deny the enjoyment that comes from firing a rocket launcher into a tornado. This may not be the best FPS multiplayer game available, and there are still plenty of issues that need ironing out, but there are occasionally some thrilling moments that you won’t be able to experience in the likes of Call of Duty or Fortinte. It remains frustrating having to pay full price for a multiplayer game, but if you’re already a fan of the franchise and don’t mind missing out on the campaign, you’ll likely enjoy yourself here. The nostalgic aspect of Portal mode will also draw fans in, and of course, the 4K graphics make it very pretty game, even if it has its cracks.
    Read full review
  2. Riot Pixels
    Dec 23, 2021
    40
    The weakest first-person shooter in the history of DICE. Even, by some miracle, the studio manages to fix the most glaring mistakes and reanimate the abysmal netcode, this game will not become Battlefield at its core.
    Read full review
  3. Merlin'in Kazanı (Turkey)
    Dec 16, 2021
    65
    Despite the promising Portal mode, Battlefield 2042, which uses players as a tester, still gives the impression of an incomplete game with its errors and important problems.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »