User Score
7.2

Mixed or average reviews- based on 2720 Ratings

User score distribution:
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
  1. May 2, 2017
    2
    I was not a fan of the portrayal of soldiers in the game, many of which were non-white. in a war were only 7% of the fighting forces were non-white having so many running around on the battlefield takes away from the historical accuracy DICE says they want to have. I understand they want to show the sides of the war not many people know about like the "Harlem hellfighters" and what not butI was not a fan of the portrayal of soldiers in the game, many of which were non-white. in a war were only 7% of the fighting forces were non-white having so many running around on the battlefield takes away from the historical accuracy DICE says they want to have. I understand they want to show the sides of the war not many people know about like the "Harlem hellfighters" and what not but that doesn't excuse the fact that there are so many blacks mixed in with the German, British and Australian Forces nor should it make up for the black man on the poster.

    Other than that the game is fun at times but the spawns are terrible i've spawned right behind enemies and killed like 3 people, fun for me but still. Also the game feels too messy i wanted there to be coordination and you have to charge the enemy all at once to cap a point or something but that was not the case.
    Expand
  2. Apr 30, 2017
    6
    I've played the game quite a bit now, and I'm sad to say I've never gotten that "this is amazing!" feeling that I got in Battlefield 4. The game is beautiful, and a wonderful ode to the first World War, but the gameplay feels impossible from mid to long distance. Of course, weapons were less accurate back then, but when has Battlefield been about complete historical accuracy? When I pointI've played the game quite a bit now, and I'm sad to say I've never gotten that "this is amazing!" feeling that I got in Battlefield 4. The game is beautiful, and a wonderful ode to the first World War, but the gameplay feels impossible from mid to long distance. Of course, weapons were less accurate back then, but when has Battlefield been about complete historical accuracy? When I point my damn gun at someone, and it's a semi-auto weapon, I want the shot to hit them!

    The game is dominated by smg's and lmg's. Lmg's are the most accurate weapons in the game (unless you're at a dead standstill with a sniper) which makes no sense. Playing this game just makes me want to jump back into BF4, which is what I've been doing.

    Many people will say I'm just bad, but I'm one of those players that makes it into the top 3-5 players every match when I'm trying. I'm also rank 83.

    To sum up: the game is beautiful and intriguing, but it's too annoying and luck/explosive-based to be a lot of fun.
    Expand
  3. Apr 29, 2017
    2
    Started out pretty good as most of these games do, but this game as done an absolutely horrendous job of balancing itself after release. Literally 100% of games I join these days are so one sided its out right awful to play. Even if I'm on the winning team its not even a little fun. Until the find a way to balance teams in this I refuse to play. There are wayyyyyy to many games thatStarted out pretty good as most of these games do, but this game as done an absolutely horrendous job of balancing itself after release. Literally 100% of games I join these days are so one sided its out right awful to play. Even if I'm on the winning team its not even a little fun. Until the find a way to balance teams in this I refuse to play. There are wayyyyyy to many games that actually care about player experience out there on the market for me to waste even one minute of my time trying to find a good game in Battlefield. Its a shame because as i stated it started off really strong. I used to get really competitive games and have a blast playing the game, however because of the experiences I continuously have as of late I can not leave a good review. The game is well designed but the Dev team is horrible as always post release. Expand
  4. Apr 26, 2017
    7
    Captures the feelings of the chaos of WW1 with brutal bayonet charges and gas grenades but you get battle fatigue pretty fast at the game, i come back to it once in a while but its just for some light fun. i also want to address the massive loading times. but i cant not praise all the research care love time and resources making this game capture the WW 1 feel.
  5. Apr 21, 2017
    4
    This title is primarily a multiplayer addition to the franchise that explores the first world war. The campaign is pretty short and linear, however, masterfully made with fantastic cut-scenes good enough for a cinema, and innovative narrative with good story and gameplay. The campaign is very good, though a bit small in scale seeing as the title is primarily a multiplayer game.

    The
    This title is primarily a multiplayer addition to the franchise that explores the first world war. The campaign is pretty short and linear, however, masterfully made with fantastic cut-scenes good enough for a cinema, and innovative narrative with good story and gameplay. The campaign is very good, though a bit small in scale seeing as the title is primarily a multiplayer game.

    The multiplayer is as well made with wonderful graphics, sound and crisp controls. Problem is that the gameplay itself is out the window....

    The balance in the multiplayer part is very very poorly tuned. Like previous titles, snipers, not limited to the Scout class, are severely overpowered, meaning that usually more than half the servers players play only as snipers. A single bullet from a machinegun at long range does about 14 damage. Snipers does 80-100 with the same caliber.

    If you want a realistic or balanced experience this game is not what you or I are looking for.
    The campaign is good though.
    Expand
  6. Apr 20, 2017
    0
    A pathetic game by a pathetic company. I cant believe all the hype about this game. People gets blinded by the marketing so easily. You should be ashamed if you get so easily brain washed.

    Its a Battlefield 3 in a WW1 shell and not even that covers it up correctly. So many things in the game has absolutely nothing to do with WW1. AND how about the black dude on the cover? do your
    A pathetic game by a pathetic company. I cant believe all the hype about this game. People gets blinded by the marketing so easily. You should be ashamed if you get so easily brain washed.

    Its a Battlefield 3 in a WW1 shell and not even that covers it up correctly. So many things in the game has absolutely nothing to do with WW1.

    AND how about the black dude on the cover? do your research first before hyping sh*t up! there was not even 1% black soldiers in WW1.... and they putting a black guy on the cover like if blacks were some kind of heroes just to make the blacks feel good about themselves.

    Why the hell are you putting fake history out there for children to get the wrong idea about the world. Go to hell with your stupid propaganda!
    Expand
  7. Apr 11, 2017
    9
    Although the single player campaign is a little weak, the multiplayer is stronger than ever. It's pretty much everything I was hoping for when I first saw the trailers last year.
  8. Apr 11, 2017
    10
    Haven't enjoyed a battlefield game this much since Battlefield 2

    They have gone back to basics with this game & the series is better for it, while I did love Battlefield 4 I also found the gadgetry in it to be a bit overwhelming & longed for the days of Battlefield 2 when things just seemed a lot more simple Battlefield 1 takes away a lot of the nonsense added since BC2 BF3 BF4 &
    Haven't enjoyed a battlefield game this much since Battlefield 2

    They have gone back to basics with this game & the series is better for it, while I did love Battlefield 4 I also found the gadgetry in it to be a bit overwhelming & longed for the days of Battlefield 2 when things just seemed a lot more simple

    Battlefield 1 takes away a lot of the nonsense added since BC2 BF3 BF4 & adds a lot of things that make sense, for example being able to squad queue or premium friend queue (allows people without DLC to queue with people who have it) or spawning away from a flag if its under attack, also spawning in general is awesome as you get a proper situational awareness from the map to the ground

    basically if you weren't a fan of choppers, long range mortar, flir etc then this is the Battlefield game for you

    The single player is pretty impressive as well if though a bit short
    Expand
  9. Apr 10, 2017
    1
    I have never before gotten motion sickness from a videogame, but the headbob in this game really does it for me. It is exaggerated to the point where it honestly feels like your character has a slinky for a neck. And you can't disable it. I cannot play this game for more than 10 minutes at a time because of it. For something that major to slip by a company like EA is inexcusable. Do notI have never before gotten motion sickness from a videogame, but the headbob in this game really does it for me. It is exaggerated to the point where it honestly feels like your character has a slinky for a neck. And you can't disable it. I cannot play this game for more than 10 minutes at a time because of it. For something that major to slip by a company like EA is inexcusable. Do not get this if you have issues with motion sickness! Expand
  10. Apr 9, 2017
    5
    There are couple of things I like on this game. First of all it's beautiful graphics and very good performance optimization. You can play this game even using 2 cards in SLI mode, I like the idea about the WW1, but that's pretty much all.

    And now about cons: First of all I was very disappointed after finishing ridiculously short Single Player. Where are those old times with very long
    There are couple of things I like on this game. First of all it's beautiful graphics and very good performance optimization. You can play this game even using 2 cards in SLI mode, I like the idea about the WW1, but that's pretty much all.

    And now about cons: First of all I was very disappointed after finishing ridiculously short Single Player. Where are those old times with very long and entertaining Single player like Medal of Honor, older Call of Duty series, even Battlefield 4 had amazing SP, but this one is ridiculous. I don't also like the Multiplayer, because when you got killed, you have to wait a long time before you can respawn again and that's what I hate mostly about it. I like games full of action and not something like this where you have to wait all the time.

    I can't understand how this game can have one of the best ratings... I rate this game 5.5 / 10 and I regret buying it.
    Expand
  11. Apr 4, 2017
    2
    Imagine life where every time you woke up, you were shot in the head by a 10 year old and this repeated itself until you woke up in a new place.

    Welcome to BF1
  12. Apr 4, 2017
    4
    Glitches, terrible matchmaking, divided player base (after pre-released DLC for 'Premium' players), and absolutely horrible in-game mechanics leaves me wanting something more. I never leave the game satisfied, even if I have a solid k/d - victory. I've played through to 'Lv.91', have all my classes @ 23+ - after initially drooling over Ultra settings graphics you begin to see the bad thatGlitches, terrible matchmaking, divided player base (after pre-released DLC for 'Premium' players), and absolutely horrible in-game mechanics leaves me wanting something more. I never leave the game satisfied, even if I have a solid k/d - victory. I've played through to 'Lv.91', have all my classes @ 23+ - after initially drooling over Ultra settings graphics you begin to see the bad that is in the game. BF1 is a 'Steam Greenlight', still in Beta/Alpha, in-development game - similar to what Windows 10 is - pay for a full game while the developer gives you a half made release. Here, let me charge you full price for this delicious pie that I say has 10 pieces, but only give you 1. NICE DICE/EA. Expand
  13. Apr 3, 2017
    6
    Extremely beautiful graphics, animation and sound effects, the Battlefield franchise always blow gamers away with its top of the line eye candies and ear-gasmic audio work. However, Battlefield 1 (unlike the previous titles) failed to hook me with its short hollow mini campaigns and unexciting gameplay.
  14. Mar 28, 2017
    6
    Very good game. Very nice gameplay, love it! Unfortunately the game is not finished at all but already sells dlcs. Played against several hackers but you cannot do anything against them. Custom server options seem to be a joke compared to the previous games.

    Currently I have about 150h in multiplayer (over 1000h in previous battlefields).
  15. Mar 27, 2017
    9
    Best looking shooter in a while, the maps and animations are breathtaking and the game really sets itself a part from the previous battlefield games, and to honest the series did need this sort of reboot.
  16. Mar 27, 2017
    8
    Gameplay : 8
    Graphics : 10
    Story : 7
    Sound : 8
    **********************************************************************************
    Overall : 8
  17. Mar 25, 2017
    9
    Really good game white the graphics and the sound it bring the real ness to you best looking battlefield game ,great mini story but the campaign was to short.
    Multiplayer are great the vehicle are beast,not too much weapons.
  18. Mar 25, 2017
    0
    4 hours just trying to enter into a server, another 1 hour trying to press the exit button, no one single button works properly, battlefield 1? more like Battle against glitchs 1
  19. Mar 25, 2017
    10
    This game is fantastic. When Battlefield 4 came out back in 2013, I didn't think that there was going to be a better first person shooter ever again, but there was in Battlefield 1. Best First person shooter I have ever played.
  20. Mar 25, 2017
    0
    the game is not bad but it is a rip-of for the money you pay, it's basicly another bad company 2 reskins (just as every bf is) they basicly say the made it world war 1 so they can make another world war 2 game in a few years to milk the franchise again. but the worst of all, origin the most pehtetic game platform ever.
  21. Mar 24, 2017
    8
    Finally, the change in the setting shooter! The first world war in games is almost never met - is a huge plus.
    The problem is that the company is just disgusting. The company consists of different stories, and they are weak (the story about the tanker and the pilot is still normal). For the company to buy a game precisely is not necessary - that's a disappointment. I was counting on DICE,
    Finally, the change in the setting shooter! The first world war in games is almost never met - is a huge plus.
    The problem is that the company is just disgusting. The company consists of different stories, and they are weak (the story about the tanker and the pilot is still normal). For the company to buy a game precisely is not necessary - that's a disappointment. I was counting on DICE, but they can't do company. Graphics in the company and in multipleie wonderful, it is pleasing to the eye!
    The main thing in the game is the multiplayer, for what was done in this game. The multiplayer is just wonderful! He liked me immediately! Replacement of the setting worked perfectly. We have new tanks, new weapons, we have a horse. I get used and feel on the battlefield, when everything explodes above the head rush of the bullet. All I recommend!
    Expand
  22. Mar 24, 2017
    5
    Pros:

    Game looks amazing Can be played in 6+ hour sessions easily Different,varying maps Cons: Very Few maps Very few guns for each class (mostly classes have aprox 5 guns and 5 different variations,still,only 5 or so guns.) Netcode **** as always sadly Singleplayer really boring Game feels like Star Wars Battlefront for whatever reason and the hud reminds me alot of it,too.
    Pros:

    Game looks amazing
    Can be played in 6+ hour sessions easily
    Different,varying maps

    Cons:
    Very Few maps
    Very few guns for each class (mostly classes have aprox 5 guns and 5 different variations,still,only 5 or so guns.)
    Netcode **** as always sadly
    Singleplayer really boring
    Game feels like Star Wars Battlefront for whatever reason and the hud reminds me alot of it,too.
    WW1 Setting doesn't make sense,there were not this many people running around with full auto guns ,could have just gone with WW2 but it was "too mainsteam"... *facepalm*

    Biggest "conflict" of ww1 will be DLC? What the ****

    I'll still give it a 5 because its fun
    Expand
  23. Mar 23, 2017
    6
    Никаких особых наворотов по сравнению с предыдущими частями не добавилось. Зданий и разрушений стало меньше. (сеттингом это конечно оправдывается, но тем не менее).
    Картинка приятная, все по-прежнему динамично, драйвово и т,д. Сама игра держит марку, тут не докопаться.
    Только одно НО, которое я не хочу обосабливать от игры - с читерами никто не боролся и не борется и по сей день. И
    Никаких особых наворотов по сравнению с предыдущими частями не добавилось. Зданий и разрушений стало меньше. (сеттингом это конечно оправдывается, но тем не менее).
    Картинка приятная, все по-прежнему динамично, драйвово и т,д. Сама игра держит марку, тут не докопаться.
    Только одно НО, которое я не хочу обосабливать от игры - с читерами никто не боролся и не борется и по сей день. И из-за этого оценка не 9, а 6.
    Всем хорошего коннекта и честных оппонентов. :)
    Expand
  24. Mar 21, 2017
    9
    Good game, I recommend for FPS gamers that love multiplayer,

    The good: good multiplayer, excellent artistic direction, good graphics and good performance in PC FHD and 60 FPS without issues, gameplay with vehicles is awesome.

    The bad: Campaign is too short and boring, lack of maps in multiplayer, lack of weapons at the beginning in multiplayer, soundtrack is poor.
  25. Mar 19, 2017
    0
    Looks good and is pretty fun at first but then you realize its same **** every match. Really casual and gets boring fast because the unlock system sucks balls i played to 50 lvl i had everything unlocked what else was there to do? Gameplay is not fun just brainless shooting with no teamwork.
  26. Mar 14, 2017
    0
    The game policy is awful. You need to spend WAYYYY too much money to be able to play that ONE supposedly "free" map, "Giant's Shadow", and there still has not been a statement by EA why this map still can only be played by Premium members (although BASIC game users should've been able to play that map since december!). Then the game also doesn't copy with Joystick input (when JoystickThe game policy is awful. You need to spend WAYYYY too much money to be able to play that ONE supposedly "free" map, "Giant's Shadow", and there still has not been a statement by EA why this map still can only be played by Premium members (although BASIC game users should've been able to play that map since december!). Then the game also doesn't copy with Joystick input (when Joystick connected, the player can't "hold down spacebar to skip killcam", which btw is also the MOST annoying thing in ANY battlefield title so far. My thumb almost falling off already. Also EA's policy of NOT being able to purchase "They shall not pass" DLC in ANY other store on the internet. NOPE. Instead you gotta be PREMIUM, for more than 100 €. Big big thanks EA. Expand
  27. Mar 14, 2017
    1
    BattleField 1 was a disappointment for me. It's campaign story is very short and it's multiplayer isn't or even doesn't feel good but messy. Players gotta pay extra for the Expansion pass (multiplayer) content ...
    I really hope the next Call of Duty will be good as Activision must learn from it's mistakes.
  28. Mar 11, 2017
    0
    the game isn't bad. but it will get dry the levering system sucks. you also have to pay for the other army's. which is dumb. you should not have not have not to pay for them.
  29. Mar 11, 2017
    3
    Pros.
    + Good grapfics
    + Good game play

    Cons.
    - Broken game engine
    - Bugs and glitches
    - Net code
    - Optimalization
    - compaing ( 5 hours to finish )
    - no plutons , leader boards etc.
    - unstable (gpu / drivers crashes )
    - too casual
    - cheaters

    DON'T BUY THIS GAME , WAIT FOR 100% DISCOUNT AND GET THIS FOR FREE
  30. Mar 9, 2017
    8
    その当時に起こっていたことを空気ですら読み取れるいいゲームです。

    乗り物の種類は初期段階から豊富にあり、ロールも今までとは違うロールになったため、偏ることもたまにありますが、そこまで差はなくなったのではないかと思います。 ただ武器の種類が少なくBF4やハードライン、BF3などに比べればかなり劣るように見えます。 乗り物の種類は増えたものの、乗り物に乗れる人はかなり少ないのでPCスペックなどにより早い者勝ちの制度で乗り物に乗れない人が多数いる状況がよく見られます。 ガスグレネードが強いので度々修正が来ているものの個人的にはあのままでも問題ないかと思っています。
    その当時に起こっていたことを空気ですら読み取れるいいゲームです。

    乗り物の種類は初期段階から豊富にあり、ロールも今までとは違うロールになったため、偏ることもたまにありますが、そこまで差はなくなったのではないかと思います。

    ただ武器の種類が少なくBF4やハードライン、BF3などに比べればかなり劣るように見えます。
    乗り物の種類は増えたものの、乗り物に乗れる人はかなり少ないのでPCスペックなどにより早い者勝ちの制度で乗り物に乗れない人が多数いる状況がよく見られます。

    ガスグレネードが強いので度々修正が来ているものの個人的にはあのままでも問題ないかと思っています。
Metascore
88

Generally favorable reviews - based on 54 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 52 out of 54
  2. Negative: 0 out of 54
  1. PC PowerPlay
    Dec 18, 2016
    80
    Has DICE made the Great War Great again? Well, it's certainly delivered a fresh-feeling shooter in a very saturated market. But the missing modes are felt. [Issue#257, p.58]
  2. Edge Magazine
    Dec 14, 2016
    90
    Battlefield 1 is better than its predecessors in almost every way. [Christmas 2016, p.102]
  3. LEVEL (Czech Republic)
    Dec 12, 2016
    100
    Battlefield is back in shape and more so with fresh theme of the first Great War! After a long time, the campaign is successful and multiplayer is traditionally excellent. So, this year your choice is set! [Issue #269]