User Score
7.9

Generally favorable reviews- based on 174 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Negative: 21 out of 174

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
  1. Dec 29, 2021
    7
    Хорошая атмосферная игра, искусственно растянутая некоторыми механиками в ней.
  2. Aug 1, 2019
    6
    Tl;dr: great homage to Fallout 1&2 and you should definitely buy and play this game instead of yet another (how many years ago you stopped counting?) F1&2 replay. But it has flaws...

    1. Overall underdevelopment and quality inconsistency. At once you have decent quests with variety of options and in another moment - like railway ending to the story of main NPC. Doesn't matter what is
    Tl;dr: great homage to Fallout 1&2 and you should definitely buy and play this game instead of yet another (how many years ago you stopped counting?) F1&2 replay. But it has flaws...

    1. Overall underdevelopment and quality inconsistency.
    At once you have decent quests with variety of options and in another moment - like railway ending to the story of main NPC. Doesn't matter what is your character build, your previous choices - nothing.
    In soviet wasteland you can have some NATO weapons, but another, that you can add in your inventory by console will have lines like "...and how this %weapon% got onto soviet soil is a big mystery...". Mayhap, there were some plans to add exNATO settlement of surviving paratroopers? Perhaps, idk, and it's just one of examples.
    Some top-weapons requires 70 of their respecting skill (for example, throwing), another 110. Not all builds are equal.
    And game consists from 3 main areas. Wastes — the main ones and pretty good, but inconsistent. Dead City — I played after 1.1. and it's rather solid piece, however underground (subway) travel is frustrating. Mountain pass of something is delivered straight from Early Access. Boring as hell.
    And nothing will be changed, devs are making new stand-alone DLC instead patches and free ones. Wise financial decision, but, well, gotta to subtract 1 out of 10. It's ok, nobody starts perfect.

    2. Is it really a RPG or they just stole F1 title?
    Hard to answer. Skills are real pain, they are scarce, good ones are only combat-oriented and limits your character build imagination. For example, you can't make weak your sniper/hunter/very decent person with a shotgun pass checks for strength of weapon because it's in automatic weapons tree and in the end. And speaking about checks: conversations mostly consist from them. Checking your strength, your dexterity, your luck, checking on your mother, checking on your sister... Oh, well, sorry. And your character phrase choices in conversation are always like [SARCASM]. Even in that game-not-to-mention it was only one of the options. 8/10 now.

    3. They took things from F1&2 and made them worse.
    For example, do you remember JHP and AP bullets in those masterpieces? First make more damage, second has +50%, well, armor piercing and half of damage, but overall game system lead that there were some enemies that can be only damaged by APs, because they are heavily armored. Here system is much simpler, I must say casual, and APs (except special experimental weapons, btw, that are nothing but junk without original cartridges) just add 10% to, well, armor piercing. Guns does not have own armor piercing capability, so in Soviet Wasterussia cartridge shoots the gun. And btw, shotguns are lame. Remember combat shotgun burst and you, savescumming? Relax.
    Some another examples: stupider AI than 20 years ago (really, an anti-achievement, guys), trade system (the best place to trade is caravan, not an actual shops in the cities), repeating quests to get money are really frustrating, money doesn't matter much from some point anyway, game ending includes only fate of the settlements, companions and yourself, not the people you've met and changed their lives for better or worse, map is really flat (only one floor everywhere), no gun modifications (although there is primitive crafting system that allows you, for example home-make a sniper rifle with optical sight, you can't make an optical sight and place it on any other weapon, nor can other NPCs) and so on.
    7/10.

    4. They took things from F1&2 and didn't make them better.
    For example, sex and relations in game. In 1997 and 1998 you couldn't have had the latter, but you was allowed to hire a companion for a night. Same here. Remember things, that evolved in games for last twenty years, remember Mass Effect? Nothing here.
    Games did progress. Copying the classics in everything is not a wise decision.
    6/10.

    Well, I've add some words about only 2-3 replayability (first, another gender with another choices, burning the wastes for bloody ending, you, murderer of millions), intoxication with way too much easter eggs and nostalgie, but, I'll scare you off. Go and play, fellow fallouter. You have like 20 minutes to get to the steam, while fuze is still burning ;)
    Expand
  3. Jul 20, 2019
    5
    This is a decent game, but it is deeply flawed and unbalanced. I finished at lvl20 with more than decent gear, but due to my chars being almost one-shot during final encounters, I had to choose (relatively) peaceful options instead of combat, just to finish the game. Leveling and gearing up requires lots and lots of grinding and farming, and I was bored at this point as the game had almostThis is a decent game, but it is deeply flawed and unbalanced. I finished at lvl20 with more than decent gear, but due to my chars being almost one-shot during final encounters, I had to choose (relatively) peaceful options instead of combat, just to finish the game. Leveling and gearing up requires lots and lots of grinding and farming, and I was bored at this point as the game had almost nothing new to offer. I did not want to go through a hundred random encounters just to level up so that I could pass a couple of poorly-designed endgame encounters.

    One thing I really cannot understand is why XP rewards for quests are so low. You kill a bunch of stupid rats and get more XP than completing a major branch of the main quest, for example. If the quests had any decent XP rewards, it could have reduced the amount of grinding required to acceptable levels.

    To be fair, I did enjoy parts of the game, but these problems made the endgame so disappointing that I am not sure I can recommend it.
    Expand
  4. Jun 12, 2020
    5
    This is Fallout-esque in character generation, sound, UI, and basic combat. This is not Fallout-esque in any other meaningful way. The combat is wildly RNG based, making it very difficult at the start as you can easily be overwhelmed by massively superior forces, unlike Fallout. The dialogue tries hard to be funny, cute, or clever, and rarely achieves anything close to that. Most ofThis is Fallout-esque in character generation, sound, UI, and basic combat. This is not Fallout-esque in any other meaningful way. The combat is wildly RNG based, making it very difficult at the start as you can easily be overwhelmed by massively superior forces, unlike Fallout. The dialogue tries hard to be funny, cute, or clever, and rarely achieves anything close to that. Most of the time it is skip-worthy. The crafting is confusing, and completely cheese-able as all recipies are available on-line, as well as being known to people that played previously. The weapons are poorly balanced and make no sense (e.g. A sniper rifle with a range of 15m), again unlike most of Fallout's weapons. But the most jarring aspect is the map sizes, which are postage stamp compared to Fallout 1 or 2. Finally, there are many aspects (no spoilers) that were never finished or incorporated into the final game.

    I have no idea if the people claiming this is a 'successor' to Fallout in any way are shills (free copies of Atom), never played the games they are comparing this to, or are just copying what the devs claimed. However the tight curves on both enemy, quest complexity, weapons, and medicine are completely absent in Atom RPG. Sure, if you really know the Fallout games you can jump the queue, and if you built your character properly, you can get access to advanced gear earlier than intended. But that is not by design, and shows a depth of knowledge this game never gets close to.

    On the positive side, the Russian side does evoke Stalker memories, but only on a superficial level. Also the level design, while overly tight, is well done.
    Expand
  5. Dec 27, 2019
    5
    I put 5 on this game because its what fallout was to fallout 2.

    This means that its a good game with many flaws.And by that i mean your companions are uninteresting,dont have side quests of their own and you dont feel anything about them. Its better to even play solo so as to not have headaches. Quests i have to say i found 2-3 interesting,eg the cannibal quest was awesome but sooo
    I put 5 on this game because its what fallout was to fallout 2.

    This means that its a good game with many flaws.And by that i mean your companions are uninteresting,dont have side quests of their own and you dont feel anything about them. Its better to even play solo so as to not have headaches.

    Quests i have to say i found 2-3 interesting,eg the cannibal quest was awesome but sooo flawed. Damn it devs. how did you mess this great quest???

    another beef is world encounters.They are 5-6 different ones.Caravan-crazies-bandits-wild animals-lone drifter and slavers. I mean its the wasteland why limit to these 6? Gets repetitive after a while.

    If you played this game a year back then play the 1.1 version,its the whole game now albeit with bugs,not gamebreaking bugs but they are there

    And the dialogues are the same with every npc and if you dont have the required stats they wont even talk to you,but even if you do have the stats they dont say anything worthwhile.

    Perk system is 3-4 perks and the abilities tree for me at least was totally uninteresting.

    Otherwise dont let the 5 discourage you. Its a great slav fallout rpg that will give you alot of playhours. The devs have made something solid and interesting and its my opinion when atom 2 comes it will be a true gem.I think this game was their first.Check the game you will not be dissapointed. AAA companies could take notes from this small indie company.Just saw it for 12 euros on steam,best 12 euros you will ever spend guys trust me.Give this game a chance if you liked fallout 1-2
    Expand
  6. Oct 18, 2019
    7
    This is a difficult game to judge. It is obviously rooting in fallout 1/2 and graphically it's a nice upgrade. But regarding diversity and story it falls short. It has many funny dialogues, requiring a lot of reading. Gameplay is hard at first, but became very easy against the end with ammo and power ups available in great quantities. Against the end (Dead Island) I lost interest as theThis is a difficult game to judge. It is obviously rooting in fallout 1/2 and graphically it's a nice upgrade. But regarding diversity and story it falls short. It has many funny dialogues, requiring a lot of reading. Gameplay is hard at first, but became very easy against the end with ammo and power ups available in great quantities. Against the end (Dead Island) I lost interest as the quests started to stretch thin and nothing new really happened and it also got quite tedious opening all the lockers for just a biskuit. It does show it's low budget then. But atleast this also reflects in it's price and the team really works hard on permanently improving it. The end was a bit underwhelming. Expand
  7. Jun 9, 2019
    6
    a generic old styled game.
    You would like it if you like old games like fallout classics and wasteland.
    nothing special about this game.
  8. Mar 30, 2020
    7
    The game captured the good elements of Fallout, and added even more to them (crafting) (something what Wasteland 2 failed to do so).

    The biggest problem is that the game is very short and the car usage is too limited to be useful.

    The next sequel surely going to be amazing.

    Gameplay 9 / 10, but the game is just 7 / 10 because of its shortness and its graphics.
Metascore
70

Mixed or average reviews - based on 8 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 4 out of 8
  2. Negative: 1 out of 8
  1. Jun 25, 2019
    70
    For an indie-RPG, this game runs well and has a good story attached. There are several characters to choose from and many attributes to learn and adjust as you go. If you were disappointed by Fallout:76, give this one a try as it feels a lot like one would expect a Fallout game to feel, without the disappointment!
  2. Mar 29, 2019
    80
    Atom RPG is a valiant effort for a small indie team.
  3. 40
    In its desire to stick to the original Fallout RPGs, ATOM RPG disregards the lessons CRPGs have learned in the intervening years. Fallen short of both its predecessors and contemporaries in the genre, ATOM RPG .