Assassin's Creed III Remastered

 PC
User Score
4.9

Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 105 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 30 out of 105
  2. Mixed: 34 out of 105
  3. Negative: 41 out of 105

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. Slater
    May 4, 2019
    0
    This remaster doesn't make any sense, at least on PC. Not only was III always the worst AC game in my opinion, but this almost entirely graphical remaster somehow manages to make everything look worse than the original. Textures are worse, the game is locked to 60 fps which the original was not, faces now look absolutely atrocious (the scared kid in the opera house at the beginning wasThis remaster doesn't make any sense, at least on PC. Not only was III always the worst AC game in my opinion, but this almost entirely graphical remaster somehow manages to make everything look worse than the original. Textures are worse, the game is locked to 60 fps which the original was not, faces now look absolutely atrocious (the scared kid in the opera house at the beginning was always a bit creepy looking, but now he's nightmare fuel) and facial textures are far, far worse than before - and lip syncing is off in places where it didn't use to be. It's just amazing to me how a supposed "remaster" - and one for which they charge as a new game - can manage to take a step back in every area, seven years after the original came out.… Expand
  2. Trey82
    Dec 26, 2019
    0
    Skip buying or downloading the remaster ~ this thing crashes CONSTANTLY.
    If you turn graphic options off or lowered, you might get a few more minutes of play out of that session, but the game is near unplayable on two of my systems.

    Get the original!
  3. Diegosaes
    May 12, 2020
    3
    One of the worst games gameplay wise that I've ever played. Nothing runs properly. It's frustating when I try to climb a **** wall and Connor jumps or the opposite and don't you ever try to use horses. They can't even jumper over cobblestones, nevermind small steps.
    Story is boring, boring main character, boring side missions, boring everything. It was a great chore to finish this **** crap.
  4. ilborg
    Mar 30, 2019
    0
    The worst face look of I ever seen!!!Lighting become a little better but it not cost 40$. Never buy this ****
  5. Warmuro
    Jun 2, 2019
    0
    One of the worst AC games ever and it got a remaster. What was the point ? Game is also full of bugs, crashes, graphical problems/glitches and list goes on...
    Some games are bad, but this game is just... Ugly.
  6. Milad3dm
    Mar 31, 2019
    0
    This version is a complete trash
    There are so many problems. for example: Definite sound, problems in game physics and problems of optimality...
    The game is only colored from blue to yellow
    It's not a remaster, it's a scam
    This game is not worth 40$
    According to Ubisoft's new policies, the company is trying to scam users instead of providing services.
  7. Biguska
    Apr 9, 2019
    0
    AS3 RIP, thx ubisoft. I hate you I hate you I hate you I hate you I hate you
  8. johnstobbart
    Apr 1, 2019
    10
    whats the problem of gamers.it's not a remake it's a remastered.and I think it's so solid.even you beat gamer 2-3 times.feels like new game.so enjoyable details.tiny expentions visual, fights and missions.,graphics so satisfying.don't care fps locked it's not a definition of a game's real deal.good job ubisoft.
  9. Mulm
    Mar 29, 2019
    0
    Game has 60fps lock, while the original wasn't capped. Shame on you Ubisoft.
  10. VG_Alex
    Apr 5, 2019
    8
    New graphics and meaningful changes make the game's more comfortable while I playing, but Connor's character design does not good for requirements of most people. The part at the end of the game is unsatisfactory,but i still love this game.
  11. MooplayYT
    Aug 27, 2019
    3
    The worst face look of I ever seen!!!Lighting become a little better but it not cost 40$. Never buy this

    (((((((bad optimization)))))))

    ****
  12. ananke
    Mar 28, 2020
    9
    It has glitches, as other Assassin's Creed series and main character isn't lovely, but the games is fun (speacially combat) and I love all the historic figures' cameos. It has many interesting mechanics as weapons, naval missions, naval upgrdes, commerse, crafting, assassination missions for your crew. There is pleny things to do. Also you can kill a lot of american and brits (Is a goodIt has glitches, as other Assassin's Creed series and main character isn't lovely, but the games is fun (speacially combat) and I love all the historic figures' cameos. It has many interesting mechanics as weapons, naval missions, naval upgrdes, commerse, crafting, assassination missions for your crew. There is pleny things to do. Also you can kill a lot of american and brits (Is a good change if you are bore to kill germans in videogames).… Expand
  13. aecsuter
    Aug 17, 2022
    9
    pros
    - Mechanics superior to Revelations
    - Better graphics and more variety of locations
    - Pleasant story to play, with very striking antagonists
    - Very good "headquarters" evolution system
    - Some good sidequests
    - Ship Missions

    cons
    - Some repetitive sidequests

    88 out of 100
  14. aristotle61
    Jul 19, 2023
    0
    I mistakenly thought this game couldn't be as bad as most people seem to think. Now that I have played it, I see it's even worse than user reviews have suggested.

    I got the the game for virtually nothing, and I still feel cheated. The story is awful. The history, usually a strong point in most Assassin's Creed games, is not good. The developer for this game decided to rewrite a lot of    I mistakenly thought this game couldn't be as bad as most people seem to think. Now that I have played it, I see it's even worse than user reviews have suggested.

    I got the the game for virtually nothing, and I still feel cheated. The story is awful. The history, usually a strong point in most Assassin's Creed games, is not good. The developer for this game decided to rewrite a lot of history instead of just weaving fiction into actual history. The game is an absolute chore to play. The controls are garbage and they seem to go out of their way to make things even worse by having you perform tasks that the control system is not capable of performing without extreme frustration. Whether you are on foot or on horseback you get stuck or hung up on just about anything, but the horseback riding through the forest in timed missions is a nightmare. The horse refuses to keep moving and there are obstacles blocking your path everywhere.

    If you like ridiculously bad stories, horrible game play, frustration, and boredom this game is a dream come true. This series is dead to me. I wish I had never ventured past the Ezio Auditore games. After playing those great games, this game is like a punch in the face.    … Expand
  15. GamerFox
    Aug 15, 2022
    0
    poop game. Ubisoft is completely screwed. Fortunately, I downloaded a pirate and I advise everyone to do it. this game is not worth a dime. what did they do in the remaster? nothing. just 0. made the graphic yellow. wow. and so fierce bugs. I go through the dungeons of the city. all the time I open the way the hint hangs and interferes. she doesn't clean up. Now I can't choose a weapon.poop game. Ubisoft is completely screwed. Fortunately, I downloaded a pirate and I advise everyone to do it. this game is not worth a dime. what did they do in the remaster? nothing. just 0. made the graphic yellow. wow. and so fierce bugs. I go through the dungeons of the city. all the time I open the way the hint hangs and interferes. she doesn't clean up. Now I can't choose a weapon. weapon selection is triggered on 20 clicks. in short full slag and not a game. Do not take. download pirate. especially since yubiks will cut off servers for 3 assassins in 2012… Expand
  16. primalsmash
    Mar 24, 2020
    6
    On a stealth game, cover doesn't work. I get instantly detected through trees, or while in bushes... Also parry doesn't work, for example when you are attacking someone else and you get attacked it doesn't work. Or when you press anything else at the same time. I many times pressed e at exact time enemy attacks and nothing happened. Also there is no crouching. Combat is very buggy andOn a stealth game, cover doesn't work. I get instantly detected through trees, or while in bushes... Also parry doesn't work, for example when you are attacking someone else and you get attacked it doesn't work. Or when you press anything else at the same time. I many times pressed e at exact time enemy attacks and nothing happened. Also there is no crouching. Combat is very buggy and unresponsive, pressing buttons, but it doesn't do anything...

    In summary graphics is great, runs well on old pc and story is fun. But controls could use improvement. And they are simplified. I enjoyed various moves in ac 1, in this game it feels there is less variety, there could be difficulty option to set it. But there are sometimes great attack moves, when you attack multiple guys at the same time, but you can't control it.    … Expand
  17. CarloCriscuolo
    Sep 2, 2020
    8
    Gameplay is fun, though the combat system is the easiest of the whole saga. I really liked the rope hook, but i think it's op in combat. Its stealth potential has not been fully exploited in the game map.
    New killing and stealth killing animations are smooth and nice.
    Graphics is really bad for a remaster. Textures did not improve; some have even gotten worse, starting from the    Gameplay is fun, though the combat system is the easiest of the whole saga. I really liked the rope hook, but i think it's op in combat. Its stealth potential has not been fully exploited in the game map.
    New killing and stealth killing animations are smooth and nice.

    Graphics is really bad for a remaster. Textures did not improve; some have even gotten worse, starting from the characters' faces. There have been improvements in lighting and color saturation, even if that is perhaps a bit too exaggerated.

    Story is good, even though i never liked the mystical story of the present. The story of Connor is really well made and realistic, and i liked the character.

    Controls are kinda weird, and sometimes Connor jumps on some crates randomly instead of running forward in the ground. Same thing on the trees, sometimes it happens that it suddenly jumps down with no reason. You have to be very careful and precise.

    Worth playing for the boodthirsty gameplay and the story.    … Expand
  18. BlackVegetable
    Jul 7, 2020
    6
    The Remastered edition of Assassin's Creed 3 is practically a somewhat better looking version of the original game with all DLC included. They added some nice new textures and Boston and New York feel more vibrant now. The story is still the same and quite alright, with different kinds of missions including some quite original ones, though the optional objectives do not always improve theThe Remastered edition of Assassin's Creed 3 is practically a somewhat better looking version of the original game with all DLC included. They added some nice new textures and Boston and New York feel more vibrant now. The story is still the same and quite alright, with different kinds of missions including some quite original ones, though the optional objectives do not always improve the missions. On the other hand, the game is quite rough and glitchy. An example of the roughness is that the parkour is too touchy; the main character will try to climb everything he touches, even while he is running another way, which can be very frustrating. As a result of glitches some side missions can only be completed with the greatest difficulty; some don't even pop up until you're standing right next to the person involved. Glitches can be expected in an open world game, but even for that kind of game there are way too many glitches. Unfortunately, there seems to be little support for the game anymore. Conclusion: nice story, vibrant surroundings, but way too glitchy for a finished game, making 100% completion very difficult to achieve.… Expand
  19. Shtern
    Jul 11, 2020
    7
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Перепроходил конкретно ремастер, а не 3 часть, потому что мне понравился трейлер в котором показано, как все преобразилось в лучшую сторону, но в итоге был не то что бы сильно разочарован, но игра выдавала стабильные 60+ФПС на компьютере сборки I5-7400+GTX 1050Ti+DDR4 2400Gz, поэтому я бы сказал, что очень хорошо с правились с ремастером как игрой в первую очередь. Графика, конечно ужасна местами, не везде, но что точно слишком, так это освещение игры, на персонажах, кажется что их просто хотели сделать максимально яркими и насыщенными, привет 5 части (Unity), но это вышло игре боком. Кардинально ничего не меняли, что порадовало, вода, зелень окружение стали более красивыми, живыми какими-то я бы даже сказал, так что конкретно к ремастеру у меня придирок нет.
    По сюжету, игра наверное самая странная в плане истории персонажей, Ассассин индеец не так плохо, но то как он им становится, то как подается сюжет, это уже чересчур. Снова месть, прозрачное яблоко,малюсенький ключ, без которого не открыть огромную дыру... Вообщем, у игры очень много грехов, а самое обидное, что в игре вы можете участвовать ивентах внутри Анимуса и за его пределами, вот только за его пределами, участие вообще не имеет ни какого смысла, это все настолько линейно проделано за его пределами, что порой задаешься вопросом, а зачем вообще нужны такого рода миссии? Если они не о чем, особенно как по мне самой дурацкой и детской вышла миссия где вы в роли Дезмонда вызволяете отца из Абстерго. Злодей который вас преследует в не Анимуса, который имеет раздвоение личности или что у него там, я так и не понял, не до конца раскрытая линия Люси, просто мелка послевкусия ее смерти, о которой говорят все, но никто ничего толком не говорит. Вообщем, игра наверное самая спорная в завершении истории Дезмонда Маелса, но при этом наверное самый тупой конец, который только мог быть, по абсурдности, наверное самая мемная игра из асассинов евер. Спасибо что эти игры еще не оттолерастили.    … Expand
  20. Nexta-
    Feb 10, 2020
    0
    верните оригинал, это полное убожество. дайте я оригинал куплю.
  21. Zinaldo
    Jun 10, 2023
    8
    on of the best remasters ever , I can not understand why people didn't liked it , to me game has so much improvements compare to original version
  22. WHITESIXOMAR
    Sep 14, 2022
    9
    I love ACIII. As a junior historian, the AC games were always something more powerful for me than for the average gamer. A chance to dive into a fictional story set in a fixed history period. I loved every AC title. Played the original ACIII on PC back in the day and really enjoyed the end of the trilogy, the Desmond story coming to an end, and the new gameplay features introduced were aI love ACIII. As a junior historian, the AC games were always something more powerful for me than for the average gamer. A chance to dive into a fictional story set in a fixed history period. I loved every AC title. Played the original ACIII on PC back in the day and really enjoyed the end of the trilogy, the Desmond story coming to an end, and the new gameplay features introduced were a blast. This review is based on a recent replay of the remastered version on PC (tried the remastered on Series X but is way too inferior to the PC remastered, recon modern titles like AC Valhalla have great performance on consoles but these older AC entries really shine on PC)

    The colonial American setting was brilliant. The game starts in 1754 during the French Indian War that led to the 7 years' war. But the majority of the game events take place during the revolutionary war, starting in 1775. You get to see the main character connor / Ratonnagethon take part and even influence the most historic events of that time, he gets blamed for the Boston Massacre in 1770 and takes place in the Tea Party 1773 when the king's tea gets tossed into the sea by angry citizens. I really enjoyed comparing the game events and battles to the actual historical records and seeing how they implemented fiction upon a solid historic framework. After completing the game, I compared my notes taken during gameplay with events during the John Adams miniseries and the movies The crossing and The patriot, both released in the year 2000.

    There is still a problem with some new gameplay mechanics, The headquarters/homestead evolution system is nice compared with previous entries but still feels incomplete. I can't tell how some of these mechanics were improved upon in the remastered. The convoy trading system is something I ignored completely in the original, and with the remastered, I wanted to give it a try, but it is just dumb and serves no purpose. The main problem is the progression, I guess. I had redeemed some weapons packs from Ubisoft club, but the game would not let me use them "you need to complete sequence 6" but after doing that you are almost in the final part of the game. Weapons are way too expensive you need to complete the game 1st and then do some forts and side activities to get the money to buy good swords, but then as the game is over there is not much to do with the items. The same with the naval missions. Tried to take them head-on at the start and quickly realized that I needed to upgrade the ship 1st to withstand those battles, but that requires a LOT of money. After I completed the game, took on some side activities to gather money and resources and finally upgraded the ship and then only then able to complete the SHIP missions, but they all take place during 1773 as they are prequels to the events of the main story... There is something wrong here. But I was happy that my expensive officer sword would at least be used in the DLC that I intended to engage in after completing all the main game activities, so I was equipped with good tools for the job.

    The Washington Tyranny DLC was a blast, love the take on an alternate reality where Washington got corrupted by the apple. The new gameplay features were amazing, but here is the shock: you can't carry those special abilities back into the main game. And you can't carry progression from the main game into the DLC, I know there is an alternate universe and all. But still, there is a clear progression design that was not solved during the remastered process. So everything I did during the main game as far as progression, the fancy sword, the upgraded expensive ship... oh my :/

    If you enjoyed ACIII, the remastered version is the best way to re-experience one of the best AC of all time. There are clear design flaws in the progression system, but it's only natural since these are the 1st entries of this franchise and many of these flaws were corrected and improved in new releases.    … Expand
  23. svvonvrolv
    Jun 29, 2021
    0
    Ужасная и кривая игра с не компетентной тех поддержкой позор за такое в 2019 году лицевая анимация кошмар, куча багов
  24. zyllus
    Mar 3, 2022
    7
    The OG was much better than the remastered version. You can check my review on this game here. The weapon wheel was clunky and switching weapons was hectic. Remastered felt like a brightened version of the OG game. Haytham missions were cut short which makes sense but I did not like it. I loved the alternate history's take on the American revolution in the DLC. The DLC of Tyranny of KingThe OG was much better than the remastered version. You can check my review on this game here. The weapon wheel was clunky and switching weapons was hectic. Remastered felt like a brightened version of the OG game. Haytham missions were cut short which makes sense but I did not like it. I loved the alternate history's take on the American revolution in the DLC. The DLC of Tyranny of King Washington and the new combat added in the game was a great addition.… Expand
  25. Ciocolici
    Jul 31, 2023
    8
    Review only of the changes made in Remaster: (not enough space)

    Assassin's Creed III Remastered offers a bundle of two games, Assassin's Creed III and Assassin's Creed: Liberation HD. I'll break down my review into the good and bad aspects. Starting with Assassin's Creed: Liberation HD, the remaster delivers noticeable improvements in graphics, environment, and lighting. Bugs were    Review only of the changes made in Remaster: (not enough space)

    Assassin's Creed III Remastered offers a bundle of two games, Assassin's Creed III and Assassin's Creed: Liberation HD. I'll break down my review into the good and bad aspects.

    Starting with Assassin's Creed: Liberation HD, the remaster delivers noticeable improvements in graphics, environment, and lighting. Bugs were significantly reduced, making for a smoother gaming experience compared to the original. While some textures weren't replaced, this doesn't detract from the overall positive impression of the remaster. The addition of new features from the ACIII remaster, such as the mini-map, is a welcome enhancement.

    As for Assassin's Creed III, the remaster impresses during outdoor activities like parkour and combat, offering stunning visuals and a vibrant atmosphere. The updated lighting adds a refreshing touch, although some may find certain instances of orange lighting to be overdone. The remaster includes new implementations missing from the original, like double-assassination from behind, killing from bushes, and improved free-aim with ranged weapons. These additions enhance the gameplay significantly. Additionally, some textures have been updated, adding to the overall positive experience of the remaster.

    However, the story-mode faces some issues. The lighting at times breaks immersion, especially indoors, and weather effects occasionally act inconsistently. But the most significant problem lies with the character faces. While some remain the same as the original, others have been reworked and appear downgraded. This discrepancy is noticeable when comparing the original to the remaster, and it becomes the most substantial complaint about the remaster.

    Furthermore, the remaster disappoints by not updating all in-game textures. Many textures remain unchanged, resulting in a clash with the improved lighting and visuals.

    Another letdown is the locked 60fps cap. While the original allowed higher framerates, the animations from the original were not meant to be played at higher than 60 fps and they would at times break. The remaster fails to repair this, instead falsely presents the option to change the hz in the settings, but the fps stays capped at 60.

    A a big disappointment for me is not including Connor's amazing monologue. Check it here if you don't know what I mean. It's a missed opportunity not to include it, as it was also missing in the original, and it has been requested since forever.

    Regarding multiplayer, the remaster does not have it at all, which may disappoint fans who enjoyed that aspect. Not me though. Although Ubisoft's decision to remove the original games from purchase is a really horrible move. Only to force players into buying the remaster. Offering players the choice between the original and remastered versions would have been a fairer approach.

    Despite these criticisms, the remaster mostly shines, offering a stunning experience during 90% of the playthrough. For newcomers to the series or those who never played the original, the remaster provides an enjoyable experience without any complaints. However, for players familiar with the original, the downgraded character faces remain a significant concern, overshadowing the otherwise positive aspects of the remaster.

    In terms of price, the remaster offers a good deal comparing to the prices of the two original games + their DLCs they once had. Best of all, you can get this whole remastered package for free (check if still available) if you purchase the Assassin's Creed: Odyssey Season Pass.

    On the downside, the lack of properly implemented achievements on Steam is a letdown. Although present in the remaster, players cannot see them in-game or on Steam, making it difficult to showcase their accomplishments. Funny enough, you can't even see the achievements in-game. The only place where you can see your achievements officially is Ubisoft Connect, but unfortunately, at the time I am writing this, they have still even to this day not implemented a way for people to see your achievements there, only you can do it. On top of that, (again: at the time I am writing this) you don't even get in-game notifications when you unlock/earn an achievement, with or without Ubisoft Connect's overlay on, with or without Ubisoft Connect's notifications options enabled.    … Expand
  26. Miz_Gamer
    Nov 20, 2022
    8
    Graphics 6/10
    Sounds 7/10
    Gameplay 7/10
    Story:7/10
    DLC:6/10
    Open world: 8/10
  27. JPKarma
    Feb 10, 2023
    4
    Sinceramente, pouco me agradei com este jogo. Em primeiro lugar, é bem mal otimizado, pelo menos ao meu ver, e as opções gráficas são bem limitadas pra resolver isso. Pude rodar a 60 fps com tudo no mínimo, que aqui é o normal, ja que só tem normal e no talo, praticamente, e passou pela minha cabeça que seria oegal deixar as texturas no alto se pudesse deixor oitras coisas no baixo, mas...Sinceramente, pouco me agradei com este jogo. Em primeiro lugar, é bem mal otimizado, pelo menos ao meu ver, e as opções gráficas são bem limitadas pra resolver isso. Pude rodar a 60 fps com tudo no mínimo, que aqui é o normal, ja que só tem normal e no talo, praticamente, e passou pela minha cabeça que seria oegal deixar as texturas no alto se pudesse deixor oitras coisas no baixo, mas... Né?

    Quanto ao jogo em si, é a segunda vez que jogo, sendo a primeira anos atrás, quando conheci a saga. E que historinha sem graça. Haythan é até interessante no começo, mas depois é um poço de maniqueísmo, claramente mal, então a ideia de ele só ter fortes convicções não me desce.

    Connor é pra mim um personagem com 0 carisma, sempre briga e questiona com o cara que lhe foi como um pai, mas cai na pilha dos inimigos que claramente aqui são representados como "se submeta a nós ou morra", sendo que há até momentos em que Connor parece achar que fez errado em agir. Tipo, tem uma cena que literalmente um cara iria matar um pessoal por se recusar a se submeter e se justifica com "mas é pra proteger o lugar". Sim, você ia matar todo mundo do lugar pra proteger o lugar. Connor, querido, você não vê a tirania nisso? Por que essa duvida?

    O rapaz é um armário de gigante, com o carisma de um armário, e é bem difícil digerir a ideia de que ele escala como se fosse leve como uma pluma. O combate permite matar uma duzia de inimigos em 10 segundos, menos quando o contra-ataque decide que não vai funcionar, e a variedade de inimigos não valoriza o confronto. Por outro lado, na história, Connor é subjulgado várias vezes de formas patéticas e ridículas. Por mais de uma vez ele é capturado por dois guardinhas, enquanto em outros momentos muda o curso de um combate sozinho.

    Falando nisso... Meus amigos, o cara deveria estar mais famoso que o próprio George Washington. Ele venceu praticamente toda a guerra sozinho. A ideia é que um homem pode fazer a diferença, como foi no belo trailer, onde ele sozinho vai na cara e na coragem e todos se motivam pra agir, mas aqui ele não faz a diferença, ele É a diferença, tão absurdo que são seus feitos. Nem sei se podemos chamar ele de assassino porque em momento algum ele age conforme o credo, no caso utilizando as sombras e agindo discretamente. Não, aqui ele literalmente vai de frente, vencendo batalhas pra todas as grandes figuras históricas.

    A irmandade aqui e inexistente, e se não fosse pela parte que tem contato com aqueles que vieram antes, sinceramente poderia ser a história de qualquer outro jogo, porque que se dane a guerra América vs Inglaterra, a essa altura temos coisas maiores para nos importarmos, como o fim do mundo no presente.

    Há muitas mecânicas interessantes, mas nenhuma delas e valorizada. Há o matinho para se esconder, mas se você for visto entrando, já era, você vai ser detectado porque não tera onde se esconder. Você anda muito no jogo em um cenário vazio, onde você ate pode ir pelas árvores, mas... Pra quê? Coletaveis e side quests existem, mas... Pra quê? Até os panoramas são inuteis, já que você desbloqueia o mapa andando e pode dar viagem rapida desde sempre para os lugares em que e possível. Stealth é inexistente em 95% do jogo, a ambientação não valoriza a escalada (que está mais simples, mas mais dinâmica, e isso é ok), o dinheiro e inútil porque no fim você destroça tudo e todos facilmente (quando o jogo não zoa seu contra-ataque), armas de fogo dão um tiro por ano, etc. Você pode caçar, mas so por dinheiro, já que não tem upgrades, e dinheiro é inútil. Não usei minas, dardo e corda, armadilhas, nada desses recursos, porque sempre era mais fácil so matar todo mundo na machadada mesmo ou correr. Mil mecânicas que não foram nem mesmo apresentadas. Eu so descobri que tinha minas quando em um loading apareceu "mina terreste desbloqueada", e usei uma vez so pra testar, mas e inútil porque serve pra montar armadilha, e no tempo que faz isso poderia simplesmente matar todo mundo no machado. Tem missões extras de caça, investimentos pra arrumar a casa, pode enviar assassinos pra missões, mas sinceramente, pra quê? O jogo nem incentiva, se você não deliberamos visitar a casa do Connor por curiosidade pra fazer isso, você até esquece que isso existe. A única atividade extra que é realmente divertida são os minigames de tabuleiro, mas nem isso e lá essas coisas.

    O jogo não é exatamente ruim, mas ele desperdiça tudo o que tem de legal, e conseguiu fazer a grande façanha de ter uma história mais interessante no presente que no passado. Jogando isto, só consigo pensar que, assim como o primeiro assassin's creed só serviu pra apresentar as coisas para o 2, este só serviu para apresentar as coisas para o 4.    … Expand
  28. emre-kumas
    Jun 2, 2023
    8
    Even the annoying bugs cannot spoil the pleasure I can get from this game. Fantastic...

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
75

Generally favorable reviews - based on 6 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 5 out of 6
  2. Mixed: 1 out of 6
  3. Negative: 0 out of 6
  1. MGG
    Apr 27, 2019
    80
    While the new version makes the game more accessible, offers more depth on the domain's management and a small but not marginal graphic facelift (notably sunlight management). It is unfortunately counterbalanced by the main character models being sometimes less polished, a catastrophic display of nights and a rather embarrassing bridle of the experience. This version is recommended for those who could not play the original game. However, the PC version is highly recommended, at least for the 60 FPS availability.
    Read full review
  2. The Games Machine
    Apr 9, 2019
    75
    With Assassin’s Creed III Remastered, Ubisoft improved the graphics of the games but did very little to improve everything else.
    Read full review
  3. Jeuxvideo.com
    Apr 7, 2019
    80
    Assassin’s Creed 3 Remastered offers some good upgrades, with smoother visuals and some UI fixes. If the overall experience feels dated at time, it still is a solid experience.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »