Age of Mythology: The Titans

 PC
Metascore
84

Generally favorable reviews - based on 25 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 19 out of 25
  2. Mixed: 6 out of 25
  3. Negative: 0 out of 25
Buy Now
Buy on
  1. DailyGame
    70
    Units flow well and are easy to differentiate from one culture to another, but there’s something that keeps the quality a little below what most gamers are accustomed to with the more recent RTS titles, especially where character details are concerned.
  2. Computer Gaming World
    70
    Unlike many expansions, Titans gives a lot of bang for the buck—it's just not a very loud bang, falling short of energizing an aging game.
  3. Game Chronicles
    70
    While the Atlanteans are cool, and it’s always fun to level your enemies’ towns with a 4-story creature, it’s a pretty steep price to pay.
  5. Eurogamer
    70
    Provides just about enough to be worthy of the price of entry if you're an Age of Mythology fan. The new single-player campaign is slickly presented and a lot of fun, while the addition of the new race and the Titans themselves should give a fair bit of extra longevity to the multiplayer aspect of the game.
  6. GMR Magazine
    70
    There's enough here to warrant purchase for diehard AoM fans, but it doesn't change gameplay significantly enough to draw in audiences outside the original fanbase. [Dec 2003, p.97]
  7. Computer Games Magazine
    60
    Although there's a lot of new content, it's concentrated almost solely in the Atlanteans. [Dec 2003, p.90]
    All this publication's reviews

Awards & Rankings

24
#24 Best PC Game of 2003
35
#35 Most Discussed PC Game of 2003
91
#91 Most Shared PC Game of 2003

User Reviews

All reviews »
User Score
8.9

Generally favorable reviews- based on 201 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 177 out of 201
  2. Mixed: 23 out of 201
  3. Negative: 1 out of 201
  1. Claytality
    Sep 27, 2012
    6
    I would give this game a 10/10, but nobody (about 10 people) play it online. I will not recommend it to you simply for that reason. TheI would give this game a 10/10, but nobody (about 10 people) play it online. I will not recommend it to you simply for that reason. The campaign is fun, but not to exciting. The best part of this game was the multiplayer in its heyday, which is unfortunately over. tbh this game is better than SC1 and SC2 combined, but unfortunately people do not realize this. If you want an RTS with strategy, rather than just zerging units, this game is for you. SC2 shoudl be called RTM-Real Time Mass (whatever unit).… Full Review »
  2. LordOFlibertY
    Dec 19, 2011
    6
    Honestly, I didn't really enjoy the title. The original AoM was great but tbh the expansion was a let down. The Titans are really boringHonestly, I didn't really enjoy the title. The original AoM was great but tbh the expansion was a let down. The Titans are really boring units, there isn't much variety and the campaign was a snoozer. Get the expansion only if you really enjoed the original AoM… Full Review »
  3. Exi
    Dec 11, 2011
    10
    I bought this game about 7 years ago, and I still play it. This game offers everything you would ever want in a strategy game, and theI bought this game about 7 years ago, and I still play it. This game offers everything you would ever want in a strategy game, and the expansion makes it even better. Even because of the bad graphics, you can get a huge amount of fun out of it! This game is defiantly on my top 3 list!… Full Review »
See all user reviews »