Pauline Kael
Select another critic »For 828 reviews, this critic has graded:
-
26% higher than the average critic
-
2% same as the average critic
-
72% lower than the average critic
On average, this critic grades 2.8 points lower than other critics.
(0-100 point scale)
Pauline Kael's Scores
- Movies
- TV
| Average review score: | 63 | |
|---|---|---|
| Highest review score: | The Lavender Hill Mob | |
| Lowest review score: | Revolution | |
Score distribution:
-
Positive: 372 out of 828
-
Mixed: 406 out of 828
-
Negative: 50 out of 828
828
movie
reviews
- By Date
- By Critic Score
-
- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
1900 is a romantic moviegoer's vision of the class struggle -- a love poem for the movies as well as for the life of those who live communally on the land.- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
Williams doesn't seem sure how to resolve the movie, but it's wonderfully entertaining.- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
Lighthearted and charming story of a black and white team of con artists in the Old South. Very enjoyable.- The New Yorker
-
- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
Doris Day is at her friendliest and most likable as the tomboy heroine of this big, bouncy Western musical about Jane's romance with Wild Bill Hickok.- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
Davis gives what is very likely the best study of female sexual hypocrisy in film history. Cold and proper, she yet manages to suggest the passion of a woman who'd kill a man for trying to leave her. She is helped by an excellent script (by Howard Koch) and by two unusually charged performances--James Stephenson as her lawyer and Herbert Marshall as her husband.- The New Yorker
-
- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
Good-natured, full of verbal-visual jokes, and surprisingly entertaining, though the love is less impressive than the music.- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
Sydney Pollack's directing is efficient and the film is moderately entertaining, but it leaves no residue. Except for the intensity of Newman's sly, compact performance...and the marvelously inventive acting of Melinda Dillon.- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
It isn’t a dialogue comedy; it’s visceral and lower. It’s what used to be called a crazy comedy, and there hasn’t been this kind of craziness on the screen in years. It’s a film to go to when your rhythm is slowed down and you’re too tired to think. You can’t bring anything to it (Brooks’ timing is too obvious for that) ; you have to let it do everything for you, because that’s the only way it works.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
A hugely successful slam-bang thriller that zaps the audience with noise, speed, and brutality. It's certainly exciting, bu that excitement isn't necessarily a pleasure. The ominous music keeps tightening the screws and heating things up; the movie is like an aggravated case of New York.- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
It has a distinctive and surprising spirit. It's funny, delicate, and intense -- all at the same time.- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
Though the story builds slowly (and the first half may seem a little pokey), the characters are more red-blooded and vigorous and eccentric than in most other Zinnemann films.- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
Classic, compulsively watchable rags-to-riches-and-heartbreak weeper, from a novel by Fannie Hurst.- The New Yorker
-
- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
Probably the most consistently entertaining of the Bond packages up to the time - not as startling as parts of "Goldfinger" but much superior to "Thunderball."- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
It's an enormous pleasure to see a movie that's really about something, and that doesn't lay on any syrupy coating to make the subject go down easily.- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
The dance numbers are funny, amazing, and beautiful all at once; several of them are just about perfection. And though some of the dialogue scenes are awkwardly paced and almost static, they still have a rapt, gripping quality.- The New Yorker
-
- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
Richardson is able to encompass so much in the widescreen frame that he shows how the whole corrupt mess works.- The New Yorker
-
- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
Centering on a racetrack robbery, it has fast, incisive cutting; a nervous, edgy style; and furtive little touches of characterization.- The New Yorker
-
- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
It may not be the highest praise to say that a movie is orderly and dignified or that it's like a well-cared for, beautifully oiled machine, but of its kind this Passage to India is awfully good, until the last half hour or so.- The New Yorker
-
- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
John Cusack and Mahoney have to carry the unconvincing melodramatic portion of the plot, but they carry it stunningly. [15 May 1989]- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
The movie is constructed like a comic essay, with random frivolous touches, and much of it is shot in hot, bright color that suggests a neon fusion of urban night life and movie madness. The subtexts connect with viewers' funnybones at different times, and part of the fun of the movie is listening to the sudden eruptions of giggles--it's as if some kids were running around in the theatre tickling people.- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
This is a bizarre and surprisingly entertaining satirical comedy--the story of the search beyond theatre turned into theatre, or, at least, into a movie.- The New Yorker