Pauline Kael
Select another critic »For 828 reviews, this critic has graded:
-
26% higher than the average critic
-
2% same as the average critic
-
72% lower than the average critic
On average, this critic grades 2.8 points lower than other critics.
(0-100 point scale)
Pauline Kael's Scores
- Movies
- TV
| Average review score: | 63 | |
|---|---|---|
| Highest review score: | The Lavender Hill Mob | |
| Lowest review score: | Revolution | |
Score distribution:
-
Positive: 372 out of 828
-
Mixed: 406 out of 828
-
Negative: 50 out of 828
828
movie
reviews
- By Date
- By Critic Score
-
- Pauline Kael
Once again, a "daring" Hollywood movie exposes social tensions--touches a nerve--and then pours on the sweet nothings. But along the melodramatic way, there are some startling episodes (and one first-rate bit of racial interchange), and recordings by Bix Beiderbecke, Stan Kenton, Bill Holman, and others set quite a pace.- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
While other B-budget horror producers were still using gorillas, haunted houses, and disembodied arms, Lewton and the director, Jacques Tourneur, employed suggestion, creepy sound effects, and inventive camera angles, leaving everything to the viewers' fear-filled imagination.- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
If audiences enjoy the movie, it's largely because of the elderly actors and the affection that the young director, Ron Howard, shows for them.- The New Yorker
-
- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
Sean Connery manages to rise above the material; most of the rest of the cast plays in broad style, and there have rarely been so many small, sleazy performances in one movie.- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
I was surprised at how not-bad it is. It may fall into the category of youth-exploitation movies, but it isn't assaultive, and it's certainly likable. [1 Nov 1982, p.146]- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
There's a sweet, naive feeling to the movie even when it's violent and melodramatic and atrocious, and when it's good it's good in an unorthodox, improvisatory style.- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
Tomlin confirms herself as a star whenever she gets the material, and Dolly Parton's dolliness is very winning, but it's easy to forget that Jane Fonda is around - she seems to get lost in the woodwork. The director, Colin Higgins, is a young fossil who sets up flaccid, hand-me-down gags as if they were hilarious, and damned if the audience doesn't laugh.- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
The film is far from being a seamless work of art, but it probably comes closer to the confused attitudes that Americans had toward the Vietnam war than any other film has come, and so its messiness seems honorable.- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
The Marx Brothers in one of their niftiest corny-surreal comedies; it isn't in the class of their Duck Soup but then what else is?- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
Even though the movie retreats into its narrow story line, you come out with a sense of epic horror and the perception that this white master race is retarded.- The New Yorker
Posted May 15, 2020 -
- Pauline Kael
Sam Peckinpah's happy-go-lucky ode to the truckers on the road--a sunny, enjoyable picture.- The New Yorker
-
- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
It has some silly, yet irresistibly wonderful examples of Busby Berkeley's pinwheel choreography.- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
Animated and bouncing, the movie is more Dickens than Austen; once one adjusts to this, it's a happy and carefree viewing experience.- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
This Ingmar Bergman film isn't a masterwork, or even a very good movie, but it is clearly a film made by a master.- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
Peckinpah's poetic, corkscrew vision of the modern world, claustrophobically exciting.- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
Eugene O'Neill's great, heavy, simplistic, mechanical, beautiful play has been given a straightforward, faithful production in handsome, dark-toned color.- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
It's enjoyably trivial – a piece of charming foolishness. [24 Mar 1986, p.112]- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
The movie is no more than a novelty, but it may surprise you by making you laugh out loud a few times.- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
This rabble-rousing movie appeals to a deep-seated belief in simple, swift, Biblical justice; the visceral impact of the film makes one know how crowds must feel when they're being swayed by demagogues.- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
The chemistry of pop vulgarization is all-powerful here; factually, this life of Billie Holiday is a fraud, but emotionally it delivers.- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
It's bright and blithe, like the sound of the 60s girl groups on the track; the flimsy plot hardly matters.- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
Uneven and often clumsy, yet with a distinctive satirical charm, the picture is full of misfits and faddists and social casualties.- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
Visually, it’s an original, bravura piece of moviemaking, with a weirdly ingenious vertical quality: the camera always seems to be moving up and down, rarely across.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
- Pauline Kael
So calculatedly cool and soulless and nastily erotic that it seems to belong to a new genre of virtuoso viciousness. What makes the movie unusual is the metallic elegance and the singleminded proficiency with which it adheres its sadism-for-the-connoisseur formula.- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
Nostalgic, affectionate Southern Americana out of Faulkner; the style is a little too "beguiling" but it's an awfully pleasant comedy anyway.- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
Silly, but with zest; there are some fine action sequences, and the performers seem to be enjoying their roles.- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
Raising Arizona is no big deal, but it has a rambunctious charm. The sunsets look marvelously ultra-vivid, the pain doesn't seem to be dry – it's like opening day of a miniature golf course. [20 Apr 1987, p.81]- The New Yorker
-
- The New Yorker