• Network: CBS
  • Series Premiere Date: Jun 30, 2015
Season #: 3, 2, 1
Metascore
55

Mixed or average reviews - based on 26 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 8 out of 26
  2. Negative: 2 out of 26
Watch Now

Where To Watch

Stream On
Buy on
Stream On

Critic Reviews

  1. Reviewed by: David Hinckley
    Jun 30, 2015
    60
    If you’re willing to suspend enough disbelief to enjoy Zoo, you will definitely think twice before ever again saying, “Here, kitty, kitty.”
  2. Reviewed by: Alessandra Stanley
    Jun 30, 2015
    60
    Zoo is expertly made and fits the current fascination with dystopian what-if scenarios, but it’s basic.
  3. Reviewed by: Kristi Turnquist
    Jun 25, 2015
    60
    The first episode gets us in the mood for the TV equivalent of a beach read adventure..... [James Wolk] easily rises to the task, making Jackson charming, sympathetic, and capable. Though Zoo may turn out to be more silly than sensational, Wolk is always delightful TV company.
  4. Reviewed by: Ed Bark
    Jun 25, 2015
    58
    Zoo very much spares the gore in its less than scintillating but better than lackluster opening hour.
  5. Reviewed by: Daniel Holloway
    Aug 20, 2015
    50
    While the pilot script excels in efficient plot building, it lags in dialogue and character development.
  6. Reviewed by: Ken Tucker
    Jun 30, 2015
    50
    Zoo keeps things moving quickly enough to glide past its more portentous moments.
  7. Reviewed by: Verne Gay
    Jun 30, 2015
    50
    Sure, it's summer and the viewing is easy--and Zoo is about as easy as it gets. There is some fun here, or potentially some fun.
  8. Reviewed by: Mark A. Perigard
    Jun 30, 2015
    50
    Locked up in cliches, tedium and barely believable bipeds. ... As far as extinction events go, Zoo is lame and tame.
  9. Reviewed by: Robert Bianco
    Jun 30, 2015
    50
    There's nothing particularly special about Zoo, but were we back in the days when books like this became self-contained miniseries, it would be easy enough to recommend as a non-taxing summer potboiler.
  10. Reviewed by: Joshua Alston
    Jun 30, 2015
    50
    Its premise simply isn’t interesting enough to sustain the intrigue over the course of a television season.
  11. Reviewed by: Hank Stuever
    Jun 17, 2015
    42
    A laughably over-serious pilot episode makes it difficult to take Zoo on its own terms.
  12. Reviewed by: Molly Eichel
    Jun 30, 2015
    40
    There's potential here, especially if it's not burdened with biological mumbo jumbo that makes little sense in explaining why these animals are going ape on humans. But even that potential is only that of a Patterson novel: cheap, easy to digest, and you don't have to think all that much about it.
  13. Reviewed by: Brian Tallerico
    Jun 30, 2015
    40
    It’s a snooze. And it’s disappointingly dull filmically given that Brad Anderson directed the pilot. Like Wolk and Connolly, Anderson deserved a better script. You do too.
  14. Reviewed by: Brian Lowry
    Jun 30, 2015
    40
    Zoo might build toward something more satisfying, but based on the premiere, there’s not particularly strong incentive to take the bait.
  15. TV Guide Magazine
    Reviewed by: Matt Roush
    Jun 25, 2015
    40
    It's all so groaningly obvious and B-movie earnest you'd almost welcome a Sharknado attack. [29 Jun - 12 Jul 2015, p.12]
  16. Reviewed by: Josh Bell
    Jun 25, 2015
    40
    Zoo could have been silly, over-the-top fun, but instead it’s plodding and monotonous.
User Score
5.8

Mixed or average reviews- based on 98 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 49 out of 98
  2. Negative: 28 out of 98
  1. Apr 14, 2016
    10
    This show is hilarious. If you like cheese and goofy animal attacks you should give it a watch. The humor is not apparently intentional butThis show is hilarious. If you like cheese and goofy animal attacks you should give it a watch. The humor is not apparently intentional but it's glorious. Full Review »
  2. Nov 5, 2015
    7
    Not perfect by far, but the story is quite good and the characters are written as if they are able to think on their feet. The "mistakes" thatNot perfect by far, but the story is quite good and the characters are written as if they are able to think on their feet. The "mistakes" that the characters make are very much in keeping with who they are and the goals they want to attain.
    If the world's animals were able to communicate with each other and to turn on humanity, it would be a very one sided fight, with humanity being on the losing end very quickly.
    Interesting take on the "end of the world" genre.
    Full Review »
  3. Oct 28, 2015
    9
    This show is amazing. If you love any kinds of animals, watch this show. It is original, the storyline is great, really guys, I don't getThis show is amazing. If you love any kinds of animals, watch this show. It is original, the storyline is great, really guys, I don't get attached to a TV show series that easy, but this show, attracted me so much. The 5 main characters all have different personalities and make the show even better. The only thing i could said that is not very good is that James Wolk always seems to be smiling even when he get shot. Full Review »