• Network: ABC
  • Series Premiere Date: Feb 27, 2019
Metascore
64

Generally favorable reviews - based on 17 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 9 out of 17
  2. Negative: 0 out of 17
Watch Now

Where To Watch

Buy on

Critic Reviews

  1. Reviewed by: Ed Bark
    Feb 27, 2019
    75
    Foley, Cohan and the supporting cast members need not unduly worry whether their adventures are all that plausible. What matters is whether this show is fun to watch regardless. Which it is.
  2. Reviewed by: Amy Amatangelo
    Feb 22, 2019
    73
    Whiskey Cavalier truly is the kind of show network TV is made for. It’s fun and fluffy, a proper escape. It’s not going to create thought-provoking discussions à la Russian Doll, nor is it going have you stressed out watching.
  3. Reviewed by: Glenn Garvin
    Mar 21, 2019
    70
    Whiskey Cavalier has an appealingly daft streak of sophomoric loopiness.
  4. Reviewed by: Daniel Fienberg
    Feb 25, 2019
    70
    Foley and Cohan look great and the evident pleasure they're having playing spy is infectious when coupled with the postcard locations and a little action flair. Whiskey Cavalier may not take you back to 1985, but it comes closer than some of the recent stabs at this genre.
  5. Reviewed by: Robert Lloyd
    Feb 25, 2019
    70
    You may detect a strong scent of eau de “Castle.” The 12-year-old boy within the adult TV critic finds this in the show quite pleasing. (I did watch every episode of “Castle,” to be sure.) I’m happy to overlook whatever is lacking or obvious or oversold or simplistic in its construction for the sake of the adventure, the scenery and the fun gang dynamics.
  6. 70
    There’s something charming about its happy-go-lucky sweetness, and it’s a relief to watch a show aim at goofy fun and actually hit its target. But it’s also a show where most the recent cultural reference is a DVD copy of You’ve Got Mail, some of the jokes feel dated, and the settings (whether Paris, Moscow, or a random European farmhouse) look like hand-me-down locations from the first Bourne movie.
  7. Reviewed by: Brian Lowry
    Feb 22, 2019
    70
    If there's room for a light-hearted spy procedural right now, the show feels like a pretty top-shelf version of one.
  8. Reviewed by: Erik Adams
    Feb 22, 2019
    67
    The show walks a tonal tightrope with ease, though there are some spots where it feels caught between television worlds.
  9. Reviewed by: Rob Owen
    Feb 20, 2019
    62
    Viewers have seen all these elements before, but in “Whiskey Cavalier” they’re deployed in a fun, fast-moving way that the show and the charm of its leads is hard to resist.
User Score
6.4

Generally favorable reviews- based on 42 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 22 out of 42
  2. Negative: 6 out of 42
  1. Mar 14, 2019
    3
    Remember Castle? It was a great show. Whiskey Cavelier remembers. A goofy but cunning older guy, a shrewd and passionate badass lady-cop and aRemember Castle? It was a great show. Whiskey Cavelier remembers. A goofy but cunning older guy, a shrewd and passionate badass lady-cop and a whole ton of fun sexual tension kept that show watchable for 8 awesome seasons.

    With Whiskey Cavalier I'm tapping out after episode 3. The show has tried to capture the feeing of Castle but with a twist, bad writing and unlikable charachters. The three main leads are fine and have a good chemistry but tack on a socially awkward and inherently unlikable duo of support staff and shoehorn them into every scene formulaically and you have a recipe for disaster. It's like getting spinach sprinkled on your ice cream.

    The psycologist charachter has a dour and negative comment in literally every scene she's cast in and the gadget guy feels like the guy who nobody invited to the party but showed up anyway trying to seem cool.

    Even were we to overlook these two "turds in the punchbowl" the dialog between the two leads is forced, cheesy and unsubtle.

    Overall this show is not fun, its a dour slog. The pilot was okay and the second episode was almost as good, with the third episode I've realized there's not enough here to like to justify my time.
    Full Review »
  2. Gmg
    Apr 5, 2019
    6
    There's no chemistry between the two leads. The three co-stars on the team are great together. I don't think the show will last too long.
  3. Mar 17, 2019
    5
    Different but the same. I feels like they essentially took a bunch of cliche characters, tossed them in a pot, added some not horrible comedyDifferent but the same. I feels like they essentially took a bunch of cliche characters, tossed them in a pot, added some not horrible comedy writers, poured it out and thought a funny spy was worth a shot.

    I'm onboard just to see what happens with the idea but it is tough sledding so far. Everything shows promise but the show really feels like a bunch of experiments with blending the characters, quirks and spy stuff that so far, have little cohesion. There is a nugget of promise here but after just three episodes, it has yet to find any footing. What particularly disappointed me in the last episode was Tyler James Williams' character being written even more as a tired old cliche of the fast-talking, often inept black comic relief. A true 'ugh' moment because it is such a predictable, dull and musty concept. A couple more laugh out loud moments was in there this week which I appreciated. Again, there is something buried here that is worth sticking it out for at least a few more episodes to see if they can figure out how to put it on screen. So far, my optimism is shakier but we'll see what happens.
    Full Review »