Metascore
72

Generally favorable reviews - based on 11 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 8 out of 11
  2. Negative: 0 out of 11
Watch Now

Where To Watch

Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand

Critic Reviews

  1. Reviewed by: Verne Gay
    Jan 15, 2016
    100
    Davies’ dialogue feels so organic to the characters it’s written for that it seems almost to bond to them, as naturally as if it was their skin or hair color. Actors in Davies’ production invariably rise to the level of the words placed before them. They certainly do here.
  2. Reviewed by: Molly Eichel
    Jan 19, 2016
    83
    This version of War & Peace may not have all of its parts intact, but it keeps the structure of the plot in place, giving a nice overview of Tolstoy’s novel, and keeping a tight pace for TV. It’ll be interesting to see whether the series can sustain throughout its six-part run, but the first few hours are an enjoyable way to pretend to digest great world literature.
  3. Reviewed by: Eric Renner Brown
    Jan 19, 2016
    83
    The opulent drama is entertaining as hell--Tolstoy himself would surely approve of the truly epic battle sequences. [22 Jan 2016, p.65]
  4. Reviewed by: Robert Lloyd
    Jan 19, 2016
    80
    It clips along in leaps and bounds, and the speed at which events occur can make them seem dramatically obvious, more declared than developed. Much of the time you don't feel the characters' pain so much as take it as read. But the key moments of spiritual revelation are handled well and the production gains power in the home stretch, just where you want power gained.
  5. Reviewed by: Daniel D'Addario
    Jan 15, 2016
    80
    The ambition on display is laudable; Leo Tolstoy’s novel is transformed into an entertainment product that moves with 21st century briskness.
  6. Reviewed by: Robert Rorke
    Jan 19, 2016
    75
    Viewers willing to lose themselves in this rich tapestry of a bygone world will not be disappointed.
  7. Reviewed by: Ken Tucker
    Jan 19, 2016
    70
    [Davies and director Tom Harper] reduce, expand, or toss out numerous plot lines and characters, all in the service of heavy-breathing romance and big-spectacle battle scenes in a kind of young-adult-novel depiction of Russian families caught up in 19th-century tumult.... Old pros such as Jim Broadbent, Stephen Rea, and Brian Cox are around to lend the soap opera proceedings some gravity.
  8. Reviewed by: Daniel Fienberg
    Jan 19, 2016
    70
    It's a march through epic battles, epic romance and epic intellectual discovery, but viewers are probably going to have to take that old Tolstoy off the shelf ito fully understand what's so epic about it. Onscreen, it remains a fine, fast-moving yarn, but you don't have to have read the book to nod sagely and say, "The book is better."
  9. Reviewed by: Neil Genzlinger
    Jan 19, 2016
    50
    This series starts out with promise but ultimately ends up ordinary, another historical drama with well-regarded actors, fancy costumes and not much to distinguish it from all the others.
  10. Reviewed by: Maureen Ryan
    Jan 15, 2016
    50
    It looks absolutely lovely: The Empire-waist gowns! The parties! The jaw-dropping palaces! There are undoubtedly treats for the eyes in almost every direction. As for the story, however, War and Peace feels like a long, dull slog to Moscow.
  11. Reviewed by: John Anderson
    Jan 14, 2016
    50
    At no time will the viewer feel that he or she has been transported to 1805 Russia, the drawing rooms of St. Petersburg, or the blood-soaked battlefields of the Napoleonic wars. That said, it’s not entirely a bad time. This is because directed Tom Harper and screenwriter Andrew Davies are far less interested in Tolstoy’s take on the individual’s place in the universe than they are in the who’s-sleeping-with-whom school of world literature and the more sentimental aspects of Tolstoy’s story. Neither are they much interested in subtlety.
User Score
7.8

Generally favorable reviews- based on 62 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 51 out of 62
  2. Negative: 7 out of 62
  1. Feb 1, 2016
    9
    Brilliantly acted, cast and directed, but what surprised me most of all was how moving the story was. One of the better things I 've seen onBrilliantly acted, cast and directed, but what surprised me most of all was how moving the story was. One of the better things I 've seen on TV in recent years. Full Review »
  2. Apr 22, 2016
    10
    I'm not usually a particularly massive fan, of the ostentatious period drama's, however the story was so so charming and so wonderfully acted,I'm not usually a particularly massive fan, of the ostentatious period drama's, however the story was so so charming and so wonderfully acted, the costumes and the set pieces were breathtaking. And Paul Dano's performance was superb and heart wrenching at times, However James Norton was an pleasant surprise an absolutely must watch Full Review »
  3. Feb 9, 2016
    9
    Best TV since Fargo season 1 and True Detective season 1. Cast is awesome and the general feel and pace of the show is really captivating.Best TV since Fargo season 1 and True Detective season 1. Cast is awesome and the general feel and pace of the show is really captivating. Just wish it went longer than 6 episodes :( Full Review »